HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-13
FIN A L
9:00 A.M.
November 13, 1991
Room 7, County Office Building
1 ) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) *Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: May 8 and July 17, 1'991.
7) Highway Matters:
a) Disposition of Peyton Drive.
b) Statement: VDOT Proposals for Funding, re:
1) Memorandum dated October 17, 1991, from John G. Milliken,
Secretary of Transportation, outlining several proposals to improve
the delivery of transportation services in the Commonwealth. Written
comments will be accepted until December 15 and several public
meetings are scheduled around the state to address the proposals.
2) Copy of "Legislative Alert" from the Virginia Association of Counties
re: Secretary Milliken's transportation proposals.
c) Letter dated November 4, 1991, from John G. Milliken, Secretary of
Transportation, re: sequence of construction for the Route 29 North
improvements.
d) Letter dated October 8, 1991, from J. A. Echols, Assistant Resident
Engineer, enclosing a copy of the Fiscal Summary of the Albemarle County
1990-91 Secondary Budget (from November 6, 1990 agenda).
e) Other Highway Matters.
8) 10:00 A.M. - Appeal: Sara Watson Preliminary Plat.
9) 10:30 A.M. - Deborah DiCroce, Update on Piedmont Virginia Community College.
10) 10:45 A.M. - Discussion with Private Roads Committee:
a) STA-91-1. Amendment to Chapter 18 of Albemarle Code to incorporate VDoT
mountainous terrain and rolling terrain standards.
b) ZTA-91-06. Amend Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance in Section 10.4 to
amend setback regulations in the Rural Areas District related to
private roads.
11) 11:30 A.M. - Public Hearing: To amend the service area boundaries of the
Albemarle County Service Authority in Scottsville to include TM130A( 1) ,
Parcel 64B on the southwest corner of Route 6 and Route 726 across from
the Scottsville shopping center for water and sewer service (Deferred
from October 9, 1991).
12) Finalize Bond Issue 91B - $16,070,000.
13) Appropriations:
a) United Way Scholarship Program Change Request.
b) School Fund Balance, reappropriation.
c) Pulsar grant for the School Division, appropriation.
d) Year-End Adjustments.
e) Fieldbrook Retention Basin.
f) Albemarle High School.
g) Federal At-Risk Child Care Program.
14) Executive Session: Purchase and/or Disposition of Public Property.
15) 1:30 P.M. - SP-91-58. Clifton. Public Hearing on a request to amend
SP-87 -49 to permit a 14-room bed & breakfast & a 24-seat restaurant on
10.1 ac zoned RA. Property on E side of Rt 729 approx 0.4 mi S of Rt
250. TM79,P23B&23C. Rivanna Dist.
16) Stormwater Management Report - Status Report on Committee Recommendations.
17) Set public hearing date to amend the "Equalization of Pay Ordinance" to add
the BOCA Code Board of Appeals and the Fire Prevention Code Board of
Appeals.
18) 1992 Legislative Program, Approval.
19) Land Use Value Taxation Report.
20) Comprehensive Plan, Yearly Status Report.
21) Cliff Haury - Revised School Enrollment Projections.
22) Work Session: 1992-93/1996-97 Capital Improvements Program.
23) Appointments.
24) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
25) Adjourn.
CON S E N T
AGE N D A
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Memorandum dated October 28, 1991, from Patrick K. Mullaney, Director of
Parks & Recreation, entitled "Rivanna Park Gate Permit Revision." It is
stated that the revision requested will give the County the flexibility to
charge a facility use fee if the County so desires. It is requested that
the Chairman be authorized to sign the revised permit.
FOR INFORMATION:
5.2 County Executive's Financial Management Report for September, 1991.
5.3 Memorandum of Agreement between the Virginia Department of Transportation and
the Virginia Division of Natural Resources.
5.4 Memo dated November 1, 1991, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive,
re: Youth in Government Day being set for December 11,. 1991.
5.5 Notice dated October 24, 1991, from the State Corporation Commission entitled
"In the matter of the Assessment for 1991 of Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation. "
5.6 Letter dated November 5, 1991, from D. S. Roosevelt, Resident Engineer,
entitled "Current Projects - Construction Schedule."
5.7 Copy of letter dated November 4, 1991, addressed to Kobby Hoffman, Thomas
Jefferson Planning District Commission, from H. Bryan Mitchell, State Historic
Preservation Officer, entitled "Phase II Evaluations, Crozet Crossing Project."
5.8 Copy of letter dated November 7, 1991, from Amelia Patterson, Zoning Admini-
strator, to Roger W. Ray, entitled "Official Determination of Number of
Parcels, Section 10.3.1, Tax Map 89, Parcel 81J."
5.9 Letter dated November 6, 1991, from Charles L. Clouse, Regional Supervisors,
Division of Occupational Health, re: Notice of complaints from employees
regarding health hazards at the Charlottesville Emergency Operators' Center.
5.10 Letter dated October 30, 1991, from Adelphia Cable Communications, announc-
ing changes in its services.
5.11 Copy of Planning Commission Minutes for November 7, 1991.
"
,r~'''''''
"~
r-- f"^'''-/
i
,
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charloft~ Y _ Humphris
lnck .Jou~n
Edward H Bam. Jr
Samu€'l Miller
Walter F _ Perkins
Whit\! Hall
F R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsvillt!
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
v. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Development
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC ku
DATE: November 14, 1991
SUBJECT: Board Actions of November 13, 1991
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on November 13, 1991, the follow-
ing actions were taken:
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Memorandum dated October 28, 1991, from Patrick K.
Mullaney, Director of Parks & Recreation, entitled "Rivanna Park Gate Permit
Revision." AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the revised permit agreement for the
Rivanna Park. Original agreement forwarded to Dan Roosevelt.
Agenda Item No. 5.8. Copy of letter dated November 7, 1991, from Amelia
Patterson, Zoning Administrator, to Roger W. Ray, entitled "Official Determi-
nation of Number of Parcels, Section 10.3.1, Tax Map 89, Parcel 81J." The Board
requested a report on the cumulative effect of official determination of numbers
of parcels.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Disposition of Peyton Drive. The
Board approved the following actions recoumended by staff:
1. Set a public hearing for December 11, 1991, to vacate the Peyton Drive
public right-of-way from COIIDOnwealth Drive to Greenbrier Drive (Note: An
ordinance for this purpose has been requested from Mr. St. John. The Clerk
will advertise and notify adjacent property owners. Please forward a list
of persons to be notified.);
2. Prevent access on Peyton Drive by a barricade at both Greenbrier Drive and
the southern portion of Parcel 5;
I'
Memo To:
Date:
Page 2
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
November 14. 1991
3. Remove the road bed between these barricades; and
4. Resurface the remaining portion of Peyton Drive between the Comdial en-
trance and CODmOnwealth Drive.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Statement: VDOT Proposals for Funding. Board members
are to provide cooments to the County Executive prior to November 16. DEFERRKD
further discussion until November 20 on the draft statement. The Board request-
ed that the language in paragraph 2 on the second page be strengthened.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Letter dated November 4,1991. from John G. Milliken,
Secretary of Transportation, re: sequence of construction for the Route 29 North
improvements. Board members are to provide cooments to the County Executive
prior to November 16 on the draft letter. DEFKRRKD for further discussion until
November 20.
The Board requested that adequate public notice be given on meetings of the
Joint Transportation Committee and the Planning and Coordination Council.
Agenda Item No. 7d. Letter dated October 8, 1991, from J. A. Echols.
Assistant Resident Engineer, enclosing a copy of the Fiscal Summary of the
Albemarle County 1990-91 Secondary Budget (from November 6, 1990 agenda). No
action.
Agenda Item No. 7e. Other Highway Matters.
Hr. Tucker stated that a map outlining the new alignment for Alternative 10
of the Route 29 North improvements is in the Planning Department.
At the request of concerned citizens to provide a left turn lane/signal at
the Greenbrier Drive/Route 29 North intersection, Hr. Bowerman will coordinate a
meeting with Hr. Roosevelt, the District Traffic Engineer and concerned citizens
to discuss the traffic situation. Hr. Bowerman suggested that the Highway
Department consider a left turn signal that would last 20 seconds for traffic
traveling eastbound on Greenbrier Drive.
At the request of Hr. Bowerman that the County Executive be authorized to
post a speed limit sign on Hillsdale Drive, the Board asked that staff work with
the Highway Department to find an acceptable design speed for Hi1lsdale Drive,
and to provide a report back to the Board in the future.
Hrs. Humphris requested accident data on the intersection of Hydraulic
Road/Georgetown.
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 14, 1991
Date:
Page 3
Hr. Way requested the Highway Department to review signal timing of the
traffic light at the Route 20 bridge widening project, located south of Carter's
Bridge.
Agenda Item No.8. Appeal: Sara Watson Preliminary Plat. DEFERRED to
December 11.
Agenda Item No.9. Deborah DiCroce, Update on Piedmont Virginia Community
College. Received - no action.
Agenda Item No. lOa. STA-91-1. Amendment to Chapter 18 of Albemarle Code
to incorporate VDoT mountainous terrain and rolling terrain standards. DEFERRKD
to December 11 to receive a reconmendation from staff on improving inspections
of private roads and associated costs, and the triggering mechanisms for release
of bonds.
Agenda Item No. lOb. ZTA-91-06. Amend Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
in Section 10.4 to amend setback regulations in the Rural Areas District related
to private roads. ADOPTED the attached ordinance to amend the Albemarle County
Zoning Ordinance in Section 10.4 to amend setback regulations in the Rural Areas
District related to private roads. Zoning Ordinance sheets will follow under
separate cover.
Agenda Item No. 11. Public Hearing: To amend the service area boundaries
of the Albemarle County Service Authority in Scottsville to include TM130A(1),
Parcel 64B on the southwest corner of Route 6 'and Route 726 across from the
Scottsville shopping center for water and sewer service (Deferred from Octo-
ber 9, 1991). DENIED by a tie vote.
The Board authorized staff to notify the Marthe Robin Catholic School that
the Board does declare the sales contract null and void and directs staff to
start looking again at the sale of this property.
Agenda Item No. 12. Finalize Bond Issue 91B - $16,070,000. APPROVED.
Signed resolution forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13a. Appropriation: United Way Scholarship Program Change
Request. DEFERRED to December 11, 1991. Staff is to make a report as to
whether or not there is some other way the population that was intended to be
served (the Teen Mother Program) be served before any transfer of funds is
considered.
Date:
Page 4
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
November 14, 1991
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 13b. School Fund Balance, reappropriation. APPROVED.
Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13c. Pulsar grant for the School Division, appropriation.
APPROVED. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden. APPROVED. Appropriation
form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13d. Appropriation: Year-End Adjustments. Appropriation
#900041 - Capital Improvement Fund. APPROVED. Appropriation #900042 - General
Fund. APPROVED. Appropriation # 900043 - Miscellaneous School Funds.
APPROVED. Appropriation #900044 - School Fund. APPROVED. Appropriation #
900045 - Soil & Water Conservation Grant. APPROVED. Appropriation forms sent
to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13e. Appropriation: Fieldbrook Retention Basin. APPROVED.
Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13f. Appropriation: Albemarle High School. Appropriation
#900040 - Emergency expenditures during FY 90/91. APPROVED. Appropriation
#910018 - Balance of emergency expenditures. APPROVED. Appropriation #910019 -
Increase FY 91/92 CIP appropriation for AHS for amount being transferred from
the Fire Fund. APPROVED. Appropriation #910020 - increase the FY 91/92 appro-
priation for AHS to include the expanded field house. APPROVED. Appropriation
forms sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 13g. Appropriation: Federal At-Risk Child Care Program.
APPROVED. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 15. SP-91-58. Clifton. Public Hearing on a request to
amend SP-87-49 to permit a 14-room bed & breakfast & a 24-seat restaurant on
10.1 ac zoned RA. Property on E side of Rt 729 approx 0.4 mi S of Rt 250.
TM79,P23B&23C. Rivanna Dist. DEFERRED to November 20, 1991, because the
applicant was not present. Please Notify.
Agenda Item No. 16.
mittee Recommendations.
Stormwater Management Report - Status Report on Com-
DEFERRED to December 4, 1991.
Agenda Item No. 17. Set public hearing date to amend the "Equalization of
Pay Ordinance" to add the BOCA Code Board of Appeals and the Fire Prevention
Code Board of Appeals. Set PUBLIC HEARING for December 11, 1991.
Date:
Page 5
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
November 14, 1991
Memo To:
Agenda Item No. 18. 1992 Legislative Program, Approval. ACCEPTED.
Agenda Item No. 19. Land Use Value Taxation Report. Board asked staff to
develop language that is necessary to request legislators to seek enabling
legislation that would eliminate use value in the growth areas, also include the
creating of local district programs. Staff was requested to provide a statement
as to why A/F districts are important to the County and why the County has them.
Agenda Item No. 20. Comprehensive Plan, Yearly Status Report. DEFERRED.
I have put this on the December 11, 1991, agenda for discussion.
Agenda Item No. 21. Cliff Haury - Revised School Enrollment Projections.
Presented as information, no action taken.
Agenda Item No. 22. Work Session: 1992-93/1996-97 Capital Improvements
Program. Set PUBLIC BEARING for December 4, 1991 and moved to put the Revenue
Sharing category of $500,000 back in the Highway and Transportation category.
Agenda Item No. 23. Appointments. No appointments were made.
Agenda Item No. 24. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Staff was requested to draft a report on the history of the Route 29 North
project to date.
, SJ,m,Ji:, ehark~v~l~"lla~l "",1" Y~~,l l,t Jt"ajt.~ S1r,I?tJ,cJlFt1 \~~1 fto 1~t:-~ l4V-919 t ,
~to1:mw~~/ttat~e~r\t ~~r~rUi~.t!.9:,,~~/~}-h9~i-J;
,,- - \.;
January meetings to be as follows:
January 2, 1992, 4:00 p.m. - organizational;
January 8, 1992, 7:00 p.m. - regular night meeting; public hearing for
School Board members;
January 15, 1992, 9:00 a.m. - regular day meeting;
January 22, 1992, 7:00 p.m. - regular night meeting.
The staff was asked to check the detention basin at Greenbrier and
Hillsdale drives and make a report on its status.
Memo To:
Date:
Page 6
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
v. Wayne Cilimberg
November 14, 1991
The Board asked staff to find new volunteers to run the recycling program
in Crozet.
LEN:ec:bh
Attachments (14)
cc: Robert B. Brandenburger
Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Amelia Patterson
George R. St. John
File
Edward Ii. Balll. Jr
Samuel Mill~r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlollt> Y. Humphris
.Jacl<. .Jouell
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perk1l1s
Whit\;' Hall
F R (Rick) Bowie
Rivdnna
Peter T Way
ScrJttsvill....
November 15, 1991
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
Department of Transportation
PO Box 2013
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Roosevelt:
At the Board of Supervisors' meeting on November 13, 1991, the following
actions were taken:
Agenda Item No. 5.1. Memorandum dated October 28, 1991, from Patrick K.
Mullaney, Director of Parks & Recreation, entitled "Rivanna Park Gate Permit
Revision." AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the revised permit agreement for
the Rivanna Park. Enclosed are the signed copies of the agreement. When the
agreement has been fully executed by the Highway Department, please return a
copy for our records.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Highway Matters: Disposition of Peyton Drive. The
Board approved the following actions recommended by staff:
1. Set a public hearing for December 11, 1991, to vacate the Peyton Drive
public right-of-way from COJmlOnwealth Drive to Greenbrier Drive;
2. Prevent access on Peyton Drive by a barricade at both Greenbrier Drive and
the southern portion of Parcel 5;
3. Remove the road bed between these barricades; and
4. Resurface the remaining portion of Peyton Drive between the Comdial
entrance and COJmlODwealth Drive.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Statement: VDOT Proposals for Funding. Board members
are to provide comments to the COlUlty Executive prior to November 16. DKFKRRKD
further discussion lUltil November 20 on the draft statement.
."
Mr. Dan S. Roosevelt
November 15, 1991
Page 2
Agenda Item No. 7c. Letter dated November 4, 1991, from John G. Milliken,
Secretary of Transportation, re: sequence of construction for the Route 29
North improvements. DKFKRRED for further discussion until November 20.
Agenda Item No. 7e. Other Highway Matters.
Mr. Tucker stated that a map outlining the new alignment for Alternative 10
of the Route 29 North improvements is in the Planning Department.
At the request of concerned citizens to provide a left turn lane/Signal at
the Greenbrier Drive/Route 29 North intersection, Mr. Bowerman will coordinate a
meeting with Mr. Roosevelt, the District Traffic Engineer and concerned citizens
to discuss the traffic situation. Mr. Bowerman suggested that the Highway
Department consider a left turn signal that would last 20 seconds for traffic
traveling eastbound on Greenbrier Drive.
At the request of Mr. Bowerman that the County Executive be authorized to
post a speed limit sign on Hillsdale Drive, the Board asked the staff to work
with the Highway Department to find an acceptable design speed for Hillsdale
Drive, and to provide a report back to the Board in the future.
Mrs. Humphris requested accident data on the intersection of Hydraulic
Road/Georgetown.
Mr. Way requested the Highway Department to review the signal timing of the
traffic light at the Route 20 bridge widening project, located south of Carter's
Bridge.
Very truly yours,
~.c:
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk,
LEN:ec
cc: Pat Mullaney, w/copy of agreement
Richard Huff
Robert Brandenburger
.....
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/ALBEMARLE COUNTY
SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT AGREEMENT
Permission is hereby granted to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors to
construct a gate or other barriet across and to block and close Route 1421 in
Albemarle County. Route 1421 is to be blocked for the purpose of providing security
for Rivanna Park and its facilities in Albemarle County.
The permission hereunder granted being subject to the following terms,
conditions and restrictions:
1. A fee for park facility usage may be collected at the park entrance to
cover the cost of park facility operations. No fee shall be assessed for
use of roads within the state secondary highway maintenance system.
2. The gate, gates, or other barrier gates are to be erected in accordance
with plans or sketches submitted to and approved by the Resident Engineer
of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The gates are to be located
as approved by the Resident Engineer, and the construction is to be under
the supervision and direction of the Resident Engineer. The County of
Albemarle agrees to bear the full cost of all such devises present and
future.
3. The gates are to be locked when closed, and keys are to be furnished to the
Resident Engineer. Albemarle County Board will be responsible for other
interested parties having access when the gates are closed. (Law
enforcement, fire and life saving personnel.)
4. The gates are to include reflectors and/or reflectorized signs to indicate
the road is blocked, as well as a sign indicating hours the Park will be
open to the Public. The County agrees to bear the full cost for all such
devices present and future.
5. Operation of the gate or gates, and the closing and opening of gates, is to
be entirely by personnel of Albemarle County.
6. The Virginia Department of Transportation Board shall not be responsible
for any damage or liability arising from or out of the exercise of the
privileges herein granted or from any operations in connection with the
gates or Park.
v'
.,
Page 2
7. The County shall at all times give strict attention to the safety and
rights of the traveling public, his employees and himself. Failure to
employ proper traffic control and construction standards mandated by permit
shall be cause for the Resident Engineer to order the permittee off the
rights of way and/or be cause for revocation of Permit.
8. The County agrees to carry insurance against liability for personal injury
and property damage that may arise from the work performed under permit
and/or from the operation of the p~rmitted activity -- up to one million
dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence to protect the Board Members and
Department's agents or employees; seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000)
each occurrence to protect the Board, Department, or the Commonwealth in
the event of suit.
9. This Permit is not transferable, and shall be revocable by the Virginia
Department of Transportation Board upon 30 days notice.
10. This Permit shall be revocable without prior notice upon breach by the
Permittee of any of the terms thereof.
11. This Permit shall not be construed as a grant of permanent interest or
easement, or as an abandonment of use of title to the said road, or any
part thereof, anything herein contained to the contrary nothwithstanding.
12. Immediately upon the revocation, cancellation or expiration of this Permit,
the Permittee shall remove from the premises of the Virginia Department of
Transportation all structures, facilities and other appurtenances installed
or erected by it or used by it under the terms of this Permit, and shall
restore the premises to a condition satisfactory to the Virginia Department
of Transportation Board.
13. This Permit may be canceled at the request of the Permittee upon 60 days
notice subject to the terms of paragraph lO above.
~
~
Page 3
Dated at Richmond, Virginia, this
day of
, 19
Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
R. M. Ketner, III. Permit and Truck
\1eigh Manager
Department of Transportation
Application for the foregoing Permit is hereby made and applicant hereby
agrees to the terms and conditions thereof, covenanting and binding itself to keep
and strictly perform the said terms and conditions, such application and covenants
being made on behalf of Albemarle County by its duly authorized officer, as of the
13th
day of
November
, 19 91 .
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
By:
~~ t:8 45'n.uu ~
Chairman --
~c: ;7A
Lettie E. Neher; Clerk
~
...
Distributed to Board: - ' J~
Agenda Item No. q I. /' ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Parks and Recreation Department
County Office Building
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5845
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive
FROM: Patrick K. Mullaney, Director, Parks & Recreation 1;7/11
DATE: October 28, 1991
RE: Rivanna Park Gate Permit Revision
Last May the Rivanna Park Committee recommended that a non-
resident parking fee be charged on weekends next softball season
due to high usage by non-residents.
Since the park road is a state road, we need to revise our
permit agreement with the Highway Department in order to charge
such a fee.
Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the revised Special
Land Use Permit Agreement. This permit is substantially the same
as the existing agreement with the exception of condition #1, which
gives us the flexibility to charge a facility use fee if we so
desire. This agreement is identical to the Walnut Creek agreement.
I respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors authorize
the Chairman to sign this revised agreement. All three (3) copies
should be signed and then returned to Angela Tucker's office for
completion of processing.
I appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please call me
if you have any questions.
PKM/sms
Enclosures
COUNTY OF AlBEMARLE
cc: Gene German
EXECUTIVE OfACE
I. '
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/ALBEMARLE COuNTY
SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT AGREEMENT
Permission is hereby granted to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors to
construct a gate or other barrier across and to block and close Route 1421 in
Albemarle County. Route 1421 is to be blocked for the purpose of providing security
for Rivanna Park and its facilities in Albemarle County.
The permission hereunder granted being subject to the following terms,
conditions and restrictions:
1. A fee for pa~k facility usage may be collested at the park entrance to
cover the cost of park facility operations. No fee shall be assessed for
use of roads within the state secondary highway maintenance system.
2. The gate, gates, or other barrier gates are to be erected in accordance
with plans or sketches submitted to and approved by the Resident Engineer
of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The gates are to be located
as approved by the Resident Engineer, and the construction is to be under
the supervision and direction of the Resident Engineer. The County of
Albemarle agrees to bear the full cost of all such devises present and
future.
3. The gates are to be locked when closed, and keys are to be furnished to the
Resident Engineer. Albemarle County Board will be responsible for other
interested parties having access when the gates are closed. (Law
enforcement, fire and life saving personnel.)
4. The gates are to include reflectors and~or reflectorized signs to indicate
the road is blocked, as well as a sign indicating hours the Park will be
open to the Public. The County agrees to bear the full cost for all such
devices present and future.
5. Operation of the gate or gates, and the closing and opening of gates~ is to
be entirely by personnel of Albemarle County.
6. The Virginia Department of Transportation Board shall not be responsible
for any damage or liability arising from or out of the exercise of the
privileges herein granted or from any operations in connection with the
gates or Park.
Page 2
7. The County shall at all times give strict attention to the safety and
rights of the traveling public, his employees and himself. Failure to
employ proper traffic control and construction standards mandated by permit
shall be cause for the Resident Engineer to order the permittee off the
rights of way and/or be cause for revocation of Permit.
8. The County agrees to carry insurance against liability for personal injury
and property damage that may arise from the work performed under permit
and/or from the operation of the p~rmitted activity -- up to one million
dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence to protect the Board Members and
Department's agents or employees; seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000)
each occurrence to protect the Board, Department, or the Commonwealth in
the event of suit.
9. This Permit is not transferable, and shall be revocable by the Virginia
I
Department of Transportation Board upon 3~days notice.
10. This Permit shall be revocable without prior notice upon breach by the
Permittee of any of the terms thereof.
11. This Permit shall not be construed as a grant of permanent interest or
easement, or as an abandonment of use of title to the said road, or any
part thereof, anything herein contained to the contrary nothwithstanding.
12. Immediately upon the revocation, cancellation or expiration of this Permit,
the Permittee shall remove from the premises of the Virginia Department of
Transportation all structures, facilities and other appurtenances installed
or erected by it or used by it under the terms of this Permit, and shall
restore the premises to a condition satisfactory to the Virginia Department
of Transportation Board.
13. This Permit may be canceled at the request of the Permittee upon 60 days
notice subject to the terms of paragrapb 10 above.
~,
Page 3
Dated at Richmond, Virginia, this
day of
, 19
Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
R. M. Ketner, III. Permit and Truck
Veigh Manager
Department of Transportation
Application for the foregoing Permit is hereby made and applicant hereby
agrees to the terms and conditions thereof, covenanting and binding itself to keep
and strictly perform the said terms and conditions, such application and covenants
being made on behalf of Albemarle County by its duly authorized officer, as of the
day of
, 19
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
By:
~~~tfJ~~
Chairman
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
..
llistributed to 9oard~ I{- f -7/
, .-
Agenda Item No.9/./IIX-S-'Jl
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance~
November 7, 1991
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
September 1991 Financial Report
Attached is the September 1991 Financial Report. There are no
items which show any unanticipated variances.
Perhaps the most significant numbers on the report is the
balance of revenues over expenses. Year to date expenses for the
General Fund and School Fund exceeded revenues by $7,817,897
(General $7,585,919; School $231,978). This is a normal occurrence
during the first quarter of the fiscal year; however, this does
emphasis the importance of an adequate fund balance at year end.
This report has been slightly modified from the August report.
The projected column has been revised to reflect the reserve
reduction on a more realistic basis. In the General Fund the 5%
reduction is being applied to departmental budgets, not fixed
amounts such as the transfer to the School Fund and the City/County
Revenue Sharing. This 5% is still being applied to General Fund
salaries which is probably not realistic across the board. In the
School Fund the 15% reduction is only being applied to the
discretionary accounts, not salaries or fixed expenses. Hopefully
this will more accurately show our financial position.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
MAB/bs
Attachment
..
o
Z
::J
U. ,...
...JI-~
<a:,...
a:Oa:
wc.w
ZWm
Wa:~
C!l...JW
~~I-
zOfb
::JZCJ)
o~
Ou:
w>-
...J...J
a:J:
<I-
~z
Wo
~~
<
~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ -s.-s.-s. -s.-s.-s.-s. ~I~
0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0
I- C\I LO <0 o C\I m m <OC\I ~ .....LOLOO mC\l
C\I .... C\I OCt) C\I LO LOmC\l <0 <0 ('I) ('I) <0 ....
Z ~ C\I .....: o LO en LO OLO<O COCO LOci "':00
W C\I C\I C\I ('I)C\IC\I ....C\IC\I ....
U
a:
W
a..
.....:'4C:.,
NO
~<~
8ffB
'~:':'"
'dOj
t]",a:,
....""'11i
o 0 0 01 0
49-49-49-Eo9I49-
('I) ('I) 0 ('I) <0 0 ('I) m 0 01 .....
<OC\I........C\l49-LOC\l49-Eo9I....
~~~~~ '":~ ~
LOC\loomo C\I('I) ....
oo<om.....m C\loo C\I
....49-C\l49-........49- 0
49- 49- 49- 49-
W
(!)
Z
<
J:
U
....
49-
~lii
;::(!)
mo
~ffi
('I)OO~~
o....ooom
~~'":.....~
C\lLOooO.....
vmLOC\I....
Ct).........v.....
cO('i)49- 0
L049- <0
49- 49-
....m....LO.....C\lm.....o;v
<OLOO<O....OO<O.....LO....m
C\lVC\lC\lLO....OLOooC\lLO
t-:'ooocO('i)('i)c-J..fmt-:'
....v<oooo<ov.....m('l)....
.....C\lmLOOOVV<OV('l).....
('i)"':u)'''':('i)''':c-J''':('i)LOO
49-49-49-49-49-('1)49-49-49- <0
49- 49-
W
:J
Z
W
>
W
a:
ZW
_:J
enZ
a:w
...Jw>
<LLw
...Jwa:enO::
<I-WZ...J
U<O<I-<
Ol-wa:O
...JenLLI-
I-
Z
o
i= w
< 0::1- en
0:: :JZ w
~5 ~w ~
zi= I-:J:: w
-< Z ua.. a..
:: -0 X
a: w Z...J<...J
01- :: QWI- W
<en a.. > (!)
1:-Z>- 0 <I- Z Z
>-l-en...J WOWW
O::w~W a: :: I-
Cl~LL~G:iZ()~h:~~
...J...JeJlj:S:OQWZ<WW
<< 1-0:: a..LLa..
O::-()()Z<cn~wenO
wU:J:J<()~"'::;OZ...J
z(Smm:::JO::::Z<<
W:J:J:J:JO<OOO::OI-
(!),a..a..IWa..UZI-
I-
en
W
(f)
Z
W
a..
X
W
-
m
....
~
LO
00
LO
t-:'
e
en
W
en
Z
W
a..
..... X
.... W
0 ...J
.... <
C\I I-
~ Z ....
.... W
49- ::
I-
a:
<
a..
W
0
Z
Z
0
i=
U
:J
0
W
0::
~
0
0
(f) LO
W I-
00 ()
Z W
...J
W LL
a.. W
X a:
W
0:: en
W
W 0::
> :J
0 !::
W 0
:J Z
Z W
W a..
> X
W W
a: 0
LL W
0 I-
W ()
U W
Z ,
0
:J 0::
< a..
m <<
Q
Z
::J
L!.I-C;;
-!D:cn
82~
J:ww
OD:CC
CI)-!~
>-<w
1--1-
ZOa.
::JZW
e~CI)
Ou::
w>-
-!-!
D:J:
<I-
:!:z
We
~:!:
<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- ...... C\I co ...... ('t) ('1)0 co ...... ('t) 0
...... ~~ co 'P"" m ('I) ...... co co co
z ..0 co 0 co r--.: C\i..,f LO LO 'P"" r--.:
w 'P"" 'P"" 'P"" ('t) oq- C\I C\I 'P""
()
a:
w
a..
w
(!)
z
<
:I:
()
o ;:- 0 01;:-
wcoo~co
coo co
r-:C\i" ..0
LOW LO
('t) ('t)
W W
- -
(Y;'LOoq-O!OO
oq-LOcomco......
~~......~~m~
coC\l'P""omC\l
cowoq-oq-'p""o
m WW 0
W - ~
_ 'P""
W
-
~tu
;::(!)
me
~ffi
LO'P""oq-lC\I
co('t)'P""CO'P""
LOO('t)'P""'P""
..o"":"":('t)"":
'P""LO('t)COCO
oq-('t)oq-oq-CO
WmW'P"""":
'P"" ('t)LO
W W
......C\ImC\liC\l
oq-LOoq-m......'P""
('t)mmC\lLO'P""
.. .. .... ..
cooq-mmco'P""
C\I('t)......ooco
~~~~C\I~
o'P""oq-oq- 'P""
oq-WWW LO
W W
w
:::>
z
w
>
w
a:
CJ)
...J
o ZW
o -:::>
:I: CJ)Z
() a:W
...JW>
en <LLW
J a: en a:
<~WZ...J
() < e < <CI-
Ol-wa:o
...JCJ)LLI-
I-
Z
:I: 0
~ wi=
<C ()<
wenzS:2
:I:w<CLL
~()~Q
~><CO
za:!z~en
<cw-zw
een<Coen
ZZ~i=Z
WOz()w
l=i=Q:::>~
<C~I-a:w
:;ia:~t>(!)
OOWZ~
zi=g,a..OI-
O<CzO()~
i=g:<CJ)enw
()ena:!:!:!!:!:!a..
:::>zl-!:::!:::O
a:_...J...J...J...J
t>~c:uu<
~~~~~b
I-
CJ)
w
CJ)
z
w
a..
X
w
-
co
......
~
'P""
('I)
C\I
W
-
......
'P""
.......
co
oq-
co
W
en
w
en
z
w
a..
X
w
e
w
X
u:
I
Z
o
Z
LL
o
Z
o
i=
()
:::>
e
w
a:
CJ)
w
CJ)
z
w
a..
X
w
a:
w
>
o
w
:::>
z
w
>
w
a:
LL
o
w
()
z
:5
<
OJ
~
o
LO
'P""
I-
()
W
...J
LL
W
a:
en
w
a:
:::>
!:::
e
z
w
a..
X
w
e
w
I-
()
W
J
o
a:
a..
"
. '
...10 ..::I' ,-0 eo 0) Lt)
~z en eo 0 ,- 0) 0)
,- ""':. I'-~ ~ ":. ~
-::>
o..u. ..::I' I'-Ct) 0 ,- C\I
<( Ct) C\I <0 ,- 0 Ct)
~ <0 eo (h Lt) ;
U ..::I' ct){h ..::I'
- {h {h (h
0
W
I-
0
::::>
<
z
::::>
-
...10 0) C\I C\I I'-
Oz ..::I' eo eo <0
0::> ..::1'. eo eo ~
J:u. 0 {h (h 0)
U 0) eo
,- ,-
en {h (h
wI-
..JO:
0:0
<a..~
~wO)
wO:O)
caw~
~~w
u.::sca
o<~
~cal-
ZOo..
:JZw
Q:JCJ)
uu.
...10
<(z
0:::>
Wu.
z
W
C!'
o
Ct)
q
0)
,-
..::1'.
0)
(h
,-
0)
I
o
Ct)
I
<0
o
W
U
Z
<(
...I
<(
m
o
Z
:J
U.
o
W
I-
U
0:
I-
en
W
0:
Z
::>
Ct)eo
eo 0)
C\!. ..::1'.
eoC\l
1'-..::1'
,-C\1
{h {h
en
I-
Z
W
~
I-
en
:J
....,
o
<(
en
en
W
..J
WW
uU
ZZ
<(W
..J..J
<(..J
m~
oX
ZW
:JO:
U.O~
enOu.O:
ZWZ<(
01-00..
i=W_~
<((!)I-W
-O<(W
O::JOO:
o..mZu
~C\I:JI-
o..O)O:J
o..;=U.Z
<(O)...;..J
W>-O<(
0: u. <(3:
Ct)
,-
eo
I'-
o
C\I
..::I'
(h
0)
..::I'
C\I
as
0)
~
eo
{h
en
I-
Z
W
~
I-
en
:J
..,
o
<(
...I
<(
I-
o
I-
W
()
Z
~
<(
m
o
z
::>
u.
o
W
I-
U
a:
I-
en
W
0:
Z
::>
o
W
I-
en
::>
..,
o
<(
Distributed to &au1: jj - ~ -2.1.,
Agenda Item No. q J, 1/) 3{ cr ~)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
::u:::e:::::::ve ;Ml
--
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
November 7, 1991
RE: Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Between the Department
of Transportation and Natural Resources
The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you on how the July 30,
1991 MOA adopted by the Departments of Transportation and Natural
Resources will affect Albemarle County.
Background: The MOA is intended to achieve early coordination on
road projects between Commonwealth departments to, specifically,
identify:
o environmental impacts;
o adverse environmental effects that cannot be avoided;
o measures to minimize the impact on the project;
o alternatives to the proposed road construction; and
o any irreversible environmental changes.
The following process is used only between state agencies:
o VDoT promulgate six year plans annually;
o VDoT notify all agencies when a project is initiated;
o Agencies provide environmental inventories on project;
o VDoT provide preliminary consolidated environmental
inventory;
o Agencies determine if project is a major or non-major
impact;
o Monthly meetings on major projects until all issues
resolved; or
o Unresolved issues settled by Commissioners or
Secretariats.
This process is restricted to only state funded roads that are
considered major projects as determined by the coordinating
agencies during their earlier meetings. (Attachment explains.)
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
November 7, 1991
RE: Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Between the Department of
Transportation and Natural Resources
Page 2
The ultimate goal is to reach a mutually agreeable resolution,
between state agencies, on all issues prior to a location decision
or final commitment for advertisement.
Discussion: The coordination should have a positive effect on
resolving environmental and historical impacts resulting from
planned road projects except a missing link throughout this process
is the lack of participation by the locality. This lack of
participation is two-fold:
- No notification when the process starts nor request for
us to comment on the project; and
- No status or information is provided to us on the
issues and resolutions as the project proceeds through
the process.
The result is that there may be mutual agreement between state
agencies but serious disagreement by the locality. Whether this
absence of local participation was intentional or an oversight is
undetermined but some participation needs to take place.
Discussion with Dan Roosevelt, Resident Engineer, and Edgar Robb,
VDoT's primary contact in Richmond, has indicated a willingness to
keep the County informed on relevant projects and issues. Staff
will work with VDoT on road projects undergoing this review process
and provide periodic information to you on any project of concern.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.196
Attachment
APPENDIX II
DE1ERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
1. Oasses of Actions
There are two classes of actions to identify the level of consultation and
coordination required in the environmental review process. Under this procedure,
proje.cts will be classified as either major or non-major actions.
2. Major Actions
'.
these are actions that may significantly affect the enviro~ent. Scoping of these
actions will be required to provide the opportunity for state environmental resource
agencies to review and comment. The following are examples of activities that
would constitute a major action:
,
Projects requiring a standard or general. permit (state or federal) such as
new travel lanes, structures on new location, bridges, unique aquatic habitat
and endangered species and their habitat
A new controlled access freeway
Two or more lane highway partially or totally on new location
Public controversy on the basis of adverse environmental issues
Adverse impacts to publicly owned parks, recreation areas, natural heritage
and wildlife management areas, threatened or endangered species habitat,
waterfowl/wildlife refuges, scenic rivers and/ or historic/archaeological
resources eligible for or on the National Register of Historic Places
Impacts to wetlands or streams or water quality concerns that result in the
need for a standard or general permit
Adverse impacts to social, environmental or economic elements
'.
Adverse impacts to agricultural/forestal districts or prime farmland
Disturbance of hazardous material/solid waste sites or landfills
Impacts to Chesape'ake Bay resource protection areas
2
3. Non-Major Actions
These are actions or activities that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant impact on the environment. These activities would normally be excluded
from the state scoping process; however, direct consultation with individual state
agencies may be required. Transportation activities indicative of non-major actions
include:
No standard or general permit
Umited residential, commercial or non-profit displacements
'..
Planning or technical studies not involving construction
Construction' of bike or pedes~an lanes, paths and facilities
Safety projects
Installation of f~ncing, signs, pavement markings, traffic signals, guardrails,
etc.
Emergency repairs
Acquisition of new scenic easement
3
Improvements to existing rest areas and weigh stations not involving
expansion
Construction of highway median crossovers
Construction of, turning, acceleration and deceleration lanes
Resurfacing of existing facilities and related maintenance activities
Landscaping
..
Surfacing/resurfacing of eXisting roads
4
Distributed to Board: jJ- S -q (tflt
Agenda Item No. .!if d /13 (s>{).
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
'.
,,.~
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive
DATE: November 1, 1991
RE: Youth in Government Day
I have recently been in contact with Ms. Julia Coffman of the
Cooperative Extension Service and have set the day of Wednesday,
December 11, 1991, as our next Youth in Government Day for
Albemarle High School. Staff will be meeting with representatives
of Albemarle High School to set up the procedure and schedule for
the day in early December.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter or have
suggestions for any change in our Youth in Government Day event,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.188
l' _.._. _. r
Distributed to Board: j i - ;;/ -']1.
Agenda Item No. 91. 1//3(5<.51
.
SCC62_
JOC~jfvlENT CONTROL CE!\j~'2:~fONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
("'(11 I' ,
l...;... ',,,,'
ISSi OCT 2 t.,. ,9,; 1, ;}. I ')
~. l..
r:,:~~'; l! ~
jil\ U
AT RICHMOND! I:, V NOV (~ ..:.dl
\ \ \.,
October 24, ! if ~ ~l-
u w :_"::=.:.1 ,:...~;" ._... < .
ORDER NO. 9fij.MftiO:Pf.-41d5qt(P
IN THE MATTER
OF
THE ASSESSMENT FOR 1991
OF
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the State Corporation commission has determined
pursuant to case number PST 910001 that Columbia Gas Transmission
corporation is a pipeline distribution company and after giving
notice to Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation that it would
proceed to assess for taxation the value of all property of said
company for the year 1991 has this date completed the assessment
of all such property subject to local taxation.
NOW, THEREFORE, In pursuance of the Statutes of Virginia,
the State Corporation commission does hereby ascertain and assess
as of the beginning of the first day of January, 1991, the value
of the real estate and all other tangible personal property of
said company subject to local taxation as hereinafter set
forth;
IT IS ORDERED that certified copies of this assessment
showing the value and location of such property for local
taxation made by the Commission, according to law, be furnished
to the President or other proper officer of Columbia Gas
Transmission corporation, and to the Council of every city and
ORDER NO. 9l0000034-4001
and town, and to the Board of Supervisors of every county, and to
the Commissioner of the Revenue of every county and city wherein
the property belonging to such corporation is situated so that
local taxes may be imposed thereon.
WHICH ASSESSMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
{ ...,.. ~ 7 i '~ ,.-]' :1 .___-:~
""'I, ~ n..!~ t"";O;JY J - I ~., .,> ~ ~
')/'~.,.:/ J.~",,:..:':~..K.!oJ'~"';.J' -..,.....,. -lj "":. .~, ""_..
~
T~.~:st~~:
./
.",-, '
i~. ; 3(h:!~'{.:e
:~!:2;e (~f'CCr3~ion Cc:,r~r;,'\"':.~~
2
<Il .
., ~-
::J C"
-~ca...
a::II 0 -=.-
> "a.
<>. ~~
o
000
o
o
o
o
~ :!! a- ... '" a- '" ...
'" 0 N ~ a- 0
.... ?: ~ .... 0 .... ~ ~ N '"
0 O' ..... .... O'
~ N 0 N
~!;= g; ~ ~ ~ ;! '"
.... ~ N
0_ .. 0
... .. ... ::
> a.
.;
<Il .
..... (I) U ~ c:
o - .~ ~ 0
G.I'~-~ .;:;
::J ... "
-., ::J
ca...."'4JL.
~ ~.d~
.... ClI ~ 0
o
'"
N
a-
O'
o
'"
o
'"
N
o
o
o
o
0.... :
o.
O.
'" .
_-...:.....~_--.:..._---------------
o
o 0 0
o
o
o
o
o
o 0 0
o
o
o
o
o~ 0 ~ ~:~ ~
G.lC ~ ~: ~,
~.~ ~ NI~ ~'
>
, .
" ~
II, , ,
.1 ------------__________
II Vl' . I, I , ,
!!o~Eg~: 0; ~~~ 0: ~ 0; 0
II G.I ::J::J C ~ I I ,
ll~~~~~~: : ~ ~ :
cae'-a::II_'_" ,
> c....... G.I::J I I ,
::l U l:T " ,
~_~ "'G.I:: :
,.,.. CO 'e:: :
o
'"
a-
N ,
o
;:::
N
~
N'
.... <Il .
o ., <Il
-.0:
Q,I'- U
::J.o ::J
-~...
.. ~
>
. :; 'E
4O" ..
'"
o
co
a-
....
o
co
a-
....
o
o
o
o
, ,
11-----------___________
II , ""'"
II -.1" 0. 0.0.. No -.1' 0' ..0.
::'Ot ~: g::~: ~: ~ ~:
II c:J .. I .. I .. I ..,
!i~~ 0: E ~ ~~ ~' ~:
!! ~ ~ ",.. ~ I :
II . ,
II N ,
II' I . ,
11--------______________
II , , ,," I
II fI) O. 0. to-.. -0' 0 1.1"\' O.
::O~C. : 0:: c> ;3; ~::
II CI ~ C I... 0" I ,
i!.3"E~~ : g ~~: :
:: ~ ~ e ~ : ~.. ...0" :
::. i" ~
:: -
&:
P'f"l" :
'" '
~
<
"- <Il"
.,..c:....
<Il ~ 0
.. .,
-w.=.(tlQ,l
a:1-....-m
~cc L.
....Q,I>.ltl_
~ (I] L. C -C .
Of.l)8.Q.f.J~ >-Q
~;:c~.=: ~"E
- ..... ,- u .... Q. ro
... >- 0
c:zc..:::c_ cc:C
U-:lucao a..:J:
o 0.. ~ 0
....l>-.J:CLI .... I.l.,.....
UVl CeO
cz _U~.. ...
ZWCI)O czo
CClrJI G.I 0 '
>-c~~-=~ ~'
~3:g~-~ ~5
a.. co 0 Ul 00
~~"E~~~ ~~,
.. ,,~
I.&. I.l- L ,_
oo~.,~
w cu"'Eo
::E ..::J
""
Z
~
...
Vl
C
o
u
'"
<IlN
.,'"
x'"
::,N
>
..:::&
'" .
C ::E C
o 0
~ ~~
.~ ~ ~
c: O..c:
~ ....u
~ ~ ~~
<Il N
.. C
"'O~
~ x
ro~"8..~
-Q-;:~o
~ '" 0
........c-, a..
OU~
u
~
..
~
o
u
~
>-
...
u
w
'"'
<
w
"-
<
en
~
u
>-
...
W
en
...
%
'"
W
%
>-
...
u
~
en
;;
<
..
w
:::r
ell
%
'"
..3
>-'"'
"'0
-al
U
'"'
ww
,",w
4O,",
wu
"-
4O"-
~~
%0
U
%
B
'"
o
al
Z
~
'"
z
~
~
~
~
'"
'"'
:::r
ell
~
U
'"'
W
~
~
~
w
::&
w
"-
o
%
>-
...
u
~
<
..
o
...
'"
..
>
o
u
%
en
<
::&
i!i
<5
u
~..:
II ~ C.
11__."
II <<IO.s='-
II> uCL
II '"" <<I
:: 00 I U
"
"
"
"
:: ... .;..
II 0 ...
II _ ~
:: ~ !I::: X
110_. ~
:: ~ ~ a.
"
" G
~
"
" ..
II'" CO 4J '"" s
!! ;]j.1':
:: -;; ~ ~
II ...... CIII'" '-
, ,... " ..
.1 1i)2" CIt
:,.:, li:a
" ...
"
"
" .
=1;"2~
, .. 0
:: ! CIII;
II _ '-_
II . " ::3
II:>'" CIt
:: . ~ ~
:: ..0
i: .
11_ fA
II 0 V
" ...
:: ~ ';
II _ '-
, .. U
II:> CIII
"
,
" ....
"
"
,
"
, -
If 0 .
" ..
~ !l,~
~ ii I
" ,.
"
"
" ..,
"
::
II'" eft !Q.
" 0"" ~...
!!~~a' ~~
,,-,-"'~-!.
II . C'- .-.-
II> '-... "..
11 ::t u ~
:: ..-"2 eft
~,." . 'i
"
11_ CIII
II 0 U (,fJ
II _~
:: !l'- ~
:: .. -8 ~
" > ~
:: . ~-g
II C . i
"....
::
"
::... .;.
II 0 '-
:: ~.~
II -..c
II <<I (,J
:: > 2
"
i! N
"
" ..
:: '0"2 c .
" .. II ~
::]"2~~
II . <<I 0 "
II>_'-J::
" 0.-
II ~ .~
"
"
~
"
"
::
:!
"
::
::
::
"
"
::
"
::
"
~
"
"
"
::
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
::
"
co
co
co
co
co
co
~
....
N
....
N,
.... ,
G.
co
co
....
....
'"
....
~
N
8
..,
~
....
;!
....
N
co
....
~:
co" .
N
co
co
~
....
'"
~
....
..,
-
....
N
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
N
...
N
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
co
o
co
o
co
co
o
o
co
....
o
...
:2:
.... .
....
....
....
~. .
N
co
8
....
~
co
co
co
co
co
o
co
....
;!
....
N
'"
....
....
'"
~
;:!:
","
..,
....
....
N
;2
..,
..,
..,
o
co
co
co
co
o
o
co
o
~
co
....
c
... ..u
U"'_
U In'" 0
Z U
-UoI..U
CII: _ ..,._ at
Q.cC '-
_ U >0.._
Ilk '" '- C..c .
o(ll!.!."': ~o
~;:d,~:l ~~
;:__U>.'" ~.
cZ!O"'''- ""Ii
g-oiltO "'0
~"..cU ... ~_
Utll Coo
QZ -U~Z '-
:~:ouuc~o,'i
CUI~_ -)0., ~
S!~~:~ a~:~
a. ~ 011I oiS._
~~~.s;~ ...~:
...... u_
~~ ~~'-::
w .. 0
:J[ z
""
:z
..
...
'-
-
..
u
~
-
..
~
'-
o
u
~
..
..
~~
f~
-u
o
u
...
....
'"
o
..
~
u
~
~
:z
><
~
'"
..
'"
..
....
....
...
N
..
~
u
'"
~
z
ox
Q
...
~
:z
~
:g
....
....
....
o' .
...
u
'"
ox
~
el
""
w
~
w
...
o
o
..
0'
..
~
::
~
~
~
a..
....
N
N
...
~
Ie
GO.. :
....
o
~
::
u
'"
..
o
=
u
~
""
'"
'"
....
N
o
N
o
u
~
z
~
::
'"
'"
...
..
~
'"
N
N
N
o
<<1
::
'"
3
~
;;m
~'"
-u
u~
~~
Qu
~~
~ ::
~u
'"
::
a
~
<II
'"
'"
w
'"
~
u
, ::! ~.
--...
.o..c .-
> uQ.
0:. P
.. ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
>..
o w
] !:: ~
0_. ~
... '-
,. Q.
..;
~
'"
;:
...
...
'"
-I .
:!:
'" .
~
~:
'" .
!!!' :
.,.. :
'"
lC
... ,
..0" :
'" ,
~.. :
'" ,
~:
'" .
'"
..
....
'"
-I
~
",'
(
... .
~.
....
..,
'"
'"
'"
'"
...
...
..
..
-.,,'-c
0-'-10
e_ .-
.~1i~ ~
.........'-
>1 i;
...: iG:s
u
..
'"
..,
"," .
:2
.... .
-I .
'"
.
..
t
'"
;ll
'"
...
~.
... .
..
~
o!~
.0
!..i:
- '--
. .. ::J
I > .. Qt
= . I ~
:: ..0
II
II
: - .;
II 0 ..
II U
: ! ';
II _ c..
II . ..
..:>> III
.,;
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
-
o
!,~
.1
>
~
....
..
...
;;;
....
..
'" ,
'" ,
... ,
'"
..
-I ,
'" .
.."
N..:
I!::
... .
.... ,
'" ,
;::
...
;ll'
...
N
8
-I, ,
.... ,
...
W"I.. :
'"
...
'"
.... ,
'"
'"
'"
...
'"
'" ,
::
;::
'"
::!
-I'
'"
;;;
:!
o ..: ~ .;
'- '- ~"
~,~~'2~ !
. c:.- .-.-
:>> '-- ., ~
::J u
..-'2 ..
", . "i
..
:2
-I, .
-I
-I
..
::!
...
-I
:0
'"
-I
...
~:
'" ,
..
-.. .
o .. ..
f1-"~
. w
>
.5'2
c . .
...
..
..
~
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
:: a ~
II "
:: ~.=
11--"
II . U
~ :>> I
II .
II '"
II
II
II
II ..
~o'2c .
II · j S
~~"2~~
It . a 0 u
II>-'-..c
!!..; "~w
II
II
::
II ...
II C
.1 Q. "'.,
II _ u..c-
IIY ...0
II" "
II-",..c."
II.......-~
:a.;!;,..;_
II ~ .. '-1-" .
~O""!. u: )oooQ
=~;:c: .:: :"2
::=--u>ow ~a
IIC"~..cr::_ acC
11...._ U~o 0..2
II O. 0
II .... )ooo..c" .. loA. ....
II U ~ r:: 0 0
IIOZ _UIZ L..
:::~:O.,lIc~o "~
:: ~:~~ X-S:= =C~~: c
IICO ~_u U,~
11Q. Om 0 ._
~~~"2~;~ ....~:
II 1oA.. U W _
l:oo.~l..;; (",I
II _
II \U 0
:: ~ z
II
II
~.~
,..,'".,...., ,
~ ...
'"
..
....
...
'"
'"
-I
...
O'i
-I
:0
'"
...
...
'"
-I
'"
...
;ll" :
-I ,
:0
...
~.. .
'"
~
-I
",'
;;;
w
U
S
...
'"
.
~
o
u
S
'"
'"
~...
=].= ;5
'" u'"
. "'..
'~- ": c5 ~
"~,,,
o ~...
_U:::Icn
o <II
U
-I
....
'"
",' ,
...
]a
:a
SI!!
u...
'"
'"
...: '
::
~
~
u
~
~
~
::l
UI
...
C
2
...
...
....
....
~
u
o
i!!
...
UI
...
Z
~
C
~
t
~' :
..
~
z"
at;
u-
...~
.....
"'-
CQ
~...
......
...c
C
;::
~
~
z..
at;
u-
~~
"..
c-
"'Q
'"
~::
...c
c
&
..
-I
....
-~
B;;
u~
<II
c-
-g
UI
i3:::
::lC
C
...
;:
....
....
~
z..
at;
u-
~~
~~
......
o:;i
...
~
....
'"
N
..,
....
...
...
~
~
~
ZUl
at;
u-
'"
"'~
U..
::JIg
UI
Z ...
::l...
"'c
...
..
~ ..
B~
u~
ZUI
c-
Zg
C
"'...
u...
::lC
...
, II .
!:~..i~
It . o~,-
II> uQ.
" '- a
:: 0. I U
II
II
II
I
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
'S 'i
'3 != X
0- .!"
.a '-
> Q.
..
...
N
GO", :
N'
N
~i
"' ,
... ,
""", :
'"
g
'" '
'" ,
N ,
c'
~
'" ,
-0'" :
'" ,
...
~
"' '
0." :
~:
....
...
..,.... :
N'
N
'"
~
00'
....
co
"'
~
.... ,
Q'" :
N ,
....
;;;
~. i
"':
~
~.
N'
00
:2
-'
.. .
~~.!""S
!'~i-l:
- ..!' ~
........""
:> I li;
...: lii:~
"
C>
....
....
Q... :
"':
.
co
..
N
.... '
0'
-.r", :
....
C>
o
o
...
:2
00'
o
...
:2
00' ,
';~~
" a 0
: ! ..
It _ ""_
II . If ~
->...gt
: .H
II ...
II
II
II
II
" - ..
II 0 ..
: !I';
"- ...
" a ..
" :> ..
II
"
"'"
II
II
II
II
II _
II 0
II 2
: !.-
jl
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.;
N
N
=
....
~...:
'" '
;!'
"':
t
;;1;:
GO... :
.... '
~
'"
-0. :
'" ,
...
"'
....
....
N'
.. '
... ,
- .
...
~... :
... ,
N
"'
~
N
'"
'"
o
....
o
~
N
'"
'" ,
Q... :
....
...
~
....
N
...
N'
N
..
..
0.: 5';
'-... ! c:
~,~~~~~
. c:.- .-'-
:>""__ u~
" "
.-~ ..
..., . 'i
o
N
....
;!
i:
.... ,
:2
o
o
:2
....
N
II'
...
Ie
~
N
:;:
..0'" :
... ,
-.. .
o .. ..
!:::~
-1'-
. ..
:>
,'H
ca.
....
o
o
'"
II'
""", :
....
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
>.
0'-
!,~
-.:
a "
:: :> !
II .
:: N
::
II ..
:: '0 ~"'I
II a ~
:]~>~
II . . 0 U
tl>_l.,.~
~. e-'"
II _ ._
II
II
II
:
II ...
U ~ ....
It U.I:._
It U .... 0
"Z U
II-",~.U
1I~~__aI
:: Q" ~ i )00.;_
H","vt'-C~ .
=Ovt!!.U: "0
~~~-=p~ ~~
::Cz;':l>-- ..;
~~-5~ 0 Q"o
"-,,..cu .... .........
II UVI Coo
IIC:Z _U~Z I..
=:~:Ouii'-:~O.
II c..~~- ->0.
It,. I.. i ...... .... - ,
::!F;lc:_<: :::Iii:
IIQ. ~ 0.00.
=~~~~;] ~~:
It "'". u", ...
:ddl~: u
U ~s 0
:: :z
"
II'
:0
00' ,
o
8:
00' .
N
co
N
~
....
....
..
co
....
....
~..
'"
....
0'
-0'" :
:::l'
o
o
....
...
...,,,, :
II'
....
~
::
o
:2
..
'"
o
o
o
co
II'
..
o
g;
;!
...
s;
..
::
~,~
... ,
00
....
N
,..... :
"'.
0'
N
N
0>
..
N
...
'"
~
....
N
..
"
~
'-
..
..
..
a
a
'-
o
u
s
..
.i ~
~ u.....
~ ~Q
:: .a~
~]U.
z .
. c,..
:Q .: = i
,S~~
-U::l~
o '"
u
1
::
a
u
z
c
z
C
%
U
o
..
...
c
g
,..
.
a
u:
~~
~=
~In
.. -
~o
In...
......
;'3c
~~
_u
z-
a:
Uln
"'0
'"
.. ...
c...
...c
U
,..
- In
a~
u:
~~
<>'0
...
~~
oc
'-'
,..
Zln
au
u-
..
~~
zo
w
><...
u...
-c
o
>- In
- -
a;
~~
::;0
~~
cc
~
o
~
~
o
:z
..
w
%
,..
-
a
U
x
::;
..
::;
...
c
g
,..
-In
a~
U ..
-
~::!
~;
cc
O::!I i..
II __....
II . Q~'-
II > U Q.
. ... .
:0. IU
"
"
"
"
!I 0 ~
II _ ~
r. ~!I= l/
Mo-a5"
.. ~. '-
. > Q.
. .
. .0
.
.
.
It .. .
".. .. tJ '- S
~ ;ii:1':
. _ u!S' !l
N .... .. ... '-
:>I-giw
:.-.: ~i:S
" u
.
.
=-1';
'0'"
. 0
: !I . Ii
II _ '--
II . U :I
II:>" m
:: . I f
" ...
"
"
"
"
It _ {It
. 0 u
. u
:: !I';
II _ '-
. . u
. > ..
.
.
. '^
.
.
.
"
" -
" 0 .
" ..
:: !;.:
= .. I
" >
"
"
" .,
"
"
"
,
'"
'"
:;
,."", :
'" .
~. :
'"
'"
'"
~
'"
'"
~
G. .
~
C>
~
"'.. :
~:
.
C>
'"
.... .
'^ .
G.
....... :
.,
C>
~
...
;!
~.
C>
...
;;
C>
~
-0.. :
'^ '
;!
~.. .
C>
C>
'"
'"
""'.. :
.0
...
....
'" '
'" '
...'
'" ,
.... ,
'"
<>.
...
C>
~
C>
C>
C>
'"
.0
...'
... ,
'"
'"
E
-'
'"
'"
'"
'" ,
G.
.... .
- ,
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
C>
....
~
'" .
'" .
.... .
"':
C>
C>
C>
~:
'" .
G.
....... :
'"
'"
'"
'"
<>
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
<>
'"
N
~
;::
... '
~'1
'" .
..
o u:: ~.;
...... ! c
~.=~'2~ !
ac._G_'_
>'-- Vi
" u
.-'2 ..
,.., . 'i
'"
'"
'"
~
'" .
'"
<>
...
'"
'"
'"
<>
.... .
'" .
.0
~
",' ,
~
",'
~
~
'"
'"
'"
'"
"".. :
- ,
..
o u ..
~=1]
II. ..
" >
= . =~
It C ..
"'"
"
"
"
:: - >..
'0'"
~ !I.~
It _~
II . U
:: :> I
.
,,'"
I!
" ..
11_~'"
:: Q · is
;!~"E~~
II <<1.0 U
H>-'-.c
::. a-"
II _ .-
"
"
::
"
:,:,: ut u
...e-
II (.,I III'" 0
11:IE U
::;~~.::'
II ~ <C l: l-
It .... II ,...._
II Y. "" '- c: J:. .
::OUl!.~U: >oa
::!i:cB.::i ~'2
::=_'_U,..,'" ~.
!! ~ ! ~ ~ c~o :f ~
II ~>-.c U .. "'-_
II U. c: Q 0
1102 _U~Z '-
::~~:O.;C~O
II <CU~-'=- ->-,
II,.. '- ...... _WI
"Z!:tl W ".'
~~ . O~ ~ci
~~~"2~~~ ...~:
II w.. u...
:~~I~'-=
II W as 0
II % Z
II C _
:: z
"
'"
'"
'"
N
'" ,
~. :
'"
'"
'"
.0
'"
'"
2'" ,
'"
.0
'"
'"
~:
'"
...
...
....
~:
'" '
'"
'"
....
....
'"
G'
....
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
;;
'" .
'"
'"
'"
....
<<> .
.... ,
'" '
'" ,
;:.
""'.. :
'"
'"
<>
:8.
.... ,
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'" '
'"
'"
'" .
..... .
'"
...
...
,..,
,..,
~
'"
...
,..,
,..,
~'
'"
~
",' .
....
'"
w
U
~
::
..
w
.
~
o
u
~
..
.i So
.. u
~ :~
: .~-..
:;~u~
or:...
. wZ
r~~;
-u-c:a
o ...
u
1
=
a
u
or:
w
~
~
....
..
~
..
:~
z..
a:;;
u-
'"
..
~~
-..
'"
'" .
'"
...
o
~
~.
or:
'"
..
Z
=
Z
a
u
..
w
....
<2
....
..
~
..
...
z..
at;
u-
..
i:;;
..-
....'"
i~
....
>- ...
...u
z-
a:
uv>
w",
Z
~=
"'..
'"
...
o
~
w
....
....
>
..
~
..
Z
~
..
..
...
a
u
w
Z
...
W
'"
'"
....
..
~
=
a..
u...
u
w-
j~
- ..
>-
..'"
~....
w....
"'..
'"
.. ..
......
a;
u...
..
~~
Z ....
....
'"
... II ..
~~ c.
11--.....
II .0.1/:'-
II> U~
II '- .
:: 0:. I U
II
II
II
II
~ 0 ~
: ~ !I::: ~
o-.!"
..~ l5.
e
'"
'"
~:
~ .
"',
'"
'"
~
~.
N.
.. .
'" .
..,
'"
...
~:
Q" :
.., ,
~
'"
'"
'"
..,
~
~
'"
~
'"
~
'"
...
~
",'
..,
..,
~
'"
'"
'"
'"
...
Ci.. ,
N.
~:
N
'"
...
i'
N
'"
'"
'"
..,
.. ,
'" .
..0.. :
~:
...
..,
N
i:
~
..,
N
~
~.. :
r::;:
...
...
..,
'"
~
;.:~
_u
z-
a~
u'"
co
'"
3~
~
'"
'"
'"
~
..,
..,
'"
~
..,
'"
...
..,
,.,
'"
::
~ '"
- ..
a~
u_
~~
'"
~~
..,
N
..,
..,
...
;:::
"".. :
~.
~
..,
~
N
....
.. .
O~~...S
!I': -at:
- U!t !I
..........&.
~1'2;';;;
~ .a:S
u
~
N
Ie
"" .
~
'"
;
t'
~
-
'"
~
..,
t' :
~ .
'"
'"
"o-g~
II ~ 0
= !r ..:
II _ '-_
II . " ~
It>...at
: . I f
"'"
II
II
II
r. _ eft
II 0 U
= !";
11- '-
II . U
11> fA
II
II
"'"
II
II
II
II
II _
II 0 .
II ..
: !I.=
: -. I
" ~
"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
.;
..
..,
..
'" .
.., .
~
:3
...
....
~
~
,.,
i1
~. :
:C'
~
,.,
'"
N
N
....
..
N
..,
N'
~
~. :
... ,
....
N'
... ,
~
...
~
"," :
N
~
'"
0.,:: ~.;
.... ! c:
~,=~'2~ ~
. c- a_._
>'-_ u~
::I u
11I-'2 .
.... . 'i
'"
'"
'"
...
~
...
.:
'"
~
'"
-..
o U ..
~:::t]
. ..
~
"'2
, c i .
II ,.,
II
II
~ - ,:.
II 0 '-
l: !.~
11_":
II . U
i! ~ J
II N
::
II
II ..
:: ~"2 c .
II .!! ~
U"2~~
II . . 0 U
n>_l...&:.
l!..: .~....
II
II
II
"
= ~
II Q. .. V
" U J:_
.. U (It... 0
II Z U
It-""..c:..
:!~~i:~-
ll....cnL..CI:
::Cut!.8.U: :a-Q
::~;cS.:= 5"2
:::1-.-....)0..... :511I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~o : ~
lI.....~.&:.u .... '-_
11 U lit Coo
ItOZ _U~:::Z '-
= ~ ~ :: 0 v ; <C ~ 0 , '-Ole
II C V t!'.A::- -)0..
..:a- L..:is"'''' -... I c:
~~!~c_4: ~-: ~
11Q. . Out O~'
=~~"2~~~ .....~:
.. ~. u .... .... .
::oo~]I..= u'
II ...
II "" 0
/I ~ :z
:: ~ -
II
..
u
..
..
'"
g
'"
... ,
...
'"
:2
N ,
...
'"
..
N
'"
..' ,
;!
'"
~
...
""
~
...
N'
'"
~
'"
"".. :
'"
'"
N
~'
N
'"
'"
...
'"
N
.... ,
N
'"
~
.
~
o
u
:5
..
..
.. .
~l
r~
_ u
o
u
...
N
. ,
'"
..
..,
..
N
-
..
Q
~
..
c
z
""
'"
U
>C
W
=:
a;
u_
'"
0-
;:!O
.. -
z ~
~""
""
'"
...
N
N
~
-
z
a
u
'"
% U
<.:>-
- ..
::11'"
'"
00
~j
"'''''
~,
N' ,
N
~
z
a~
uu
==
u-
o
'"
w~
E_
~e
~
",'
,.,
..
~'"
--
B~
u:;;
BO
~~
~
'"
...
o
~
<.:>
..
:>
..
'"
w
...
~
...
...
0." :
,.,
..
~
,.,
,.,
'"
~
3
u
3
~
~
""
~
~
-
3..
u_
u
<.:>-
~~
..'"
z_
~o
"" ~
u ~
we
E
..",
~ -
_u
a~
u'"
...0
'L
~~
I II ~.
::! c.
"__II'"
II .o.&: ,-
II> U ~
II "'" .
:: 0.. I U
II
II
,
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
.;.
o ..
:!::X
0-. !"
-~ a.
.;
~:
... ,
~. :
0#
c
~:
.... .
..,
N
... .
Q.
0# .
.... .
J!!
Q
'"
;:
~
~:
....
0# ,
1'0
~
10.. :
~.
",.
.... .
-4" :
..,
Ie
... .
(
"':
~:
... .
~. :
'"
~
....
'"
Q
,,;
.
.........c:
0-'- ~ 0
.- .-
!~~ ..
-..!S' !:l
........"'"
>1 iw
..: li:g
u
Q
Q
....
'"
0..:
E:
~
...
1'0
Q
~
...
1'0
Q
N
"'.. :
Q
..,
..,
'"
C'
~
"o-g~
II ~ 0
: ! . .
II _ ""'_
" . II :1
II > ~ at
:: I ~
II '"
II
II
II
:: _ 0
II 0 II
II U
~ !.;
11- '-
II .. ..
II> .
.
II
"'"
.
II
II
II
II ...
. 0
= ! !
= Ii 1
II >
II
II
II 0#
II
II
II "
= '0 tt: ~..;
=!!33 !5
"_,:::~~~a.
. C'- .-.-
>-... tIt
:l U
..;"'~ .
,." . 'i
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
~:
... .
~:
0#
C
1'0
C
..... .
0#
~
~.. :
'" .
c.
...,... :
0#'
....
~.
1'0
~
~
... .
0#'
1'0
.
~
G.. :
8.1
o
Q
1'0
1'0
...
~"I
...
....
~:
~
'"
'"
...
Q
1'0
...
1'0
::
Q
Q
51
c.
:ll' :
Q
Q
Q
:<;
....
-4" :
..,
'"
'"
1'0
Q
c
...
...
:<;
..,
.....
0.. .
!::~
-1--
.. w
>
.'H
c .. ..
...
,
II
II
II .
II _ >0
II 0 "'"
:! !.~
Il-..e
II . U
:: > 2
II
111'0
"
::
" "
:: '0 '2 C .
II .. P
!! ~ ~ > ~
II . . 0 U
II >_ '-.&:
::. e--
:: - ,-
"
"
II
II
II ....
II C
.. ~ lit tt
M "..e-
II u t4... 0
:: ~Y.I~..
=f:Cc'-~
II _..,>oe_
II~cn'-C.c .
::OIll!.!.U: ::a
::~;:c:8.=: :~
~=-'-U)o.- ~.
II<CZ$i..eC- a&:;
:::5-o~tO ""s
lt~>-.u ... ~_
It U cd Coo
IIQZ _UIZ '-
:~~:Ouli<C~O 's
II cUI.&.- ->0' r/l
It >- '- i W ~ - - C
::=!12c_; ;55 ~
II ~ ~ 0 woo _
=~~"2.s~~ -~:
II ~. u'" ...
~aal~:
!! i ~ 5 0
:: :z
"
Q
Q
~
...
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
g
Q
Q
~
N
~. i
~
...
'"
'"
...
:<;
'0" :
0#
...
'" '
N .
'"
Q
~
N
~'
...
Q
...
~
N
..,
..,
N
N
..,
w
U
..
..
s
.
~
o
u
s
"
"
~]
~~
-u
o
u
Q
UI
-
;.:~
-...
...-
a~
uo
........
Cl....
cc
""
Q
~
_UI
a~
u:
...UI
c-
-0
c
~~
""
....
...
'"
lC
1'0
::
a
u
UI
....-
ClU
~;;
....-
"'UI
....0
U
.......
- ...
...c
""
;:::
0#
~
..~
~ UI
~:
u...
~...
jj
iE
........
u...
;~
""
Q
-
u
-
u
:
UI
o
....
...
...
~
UI
'"
U
C
...
...
...
c
'"
~
UI
;:::
..,
~
Q
t
'" '
~
'"
1'0
1'0
!i' '
c
I!j:
N
....
....
::
a
u
~
...
...
i
....
u
'"
...
""
....
;:!
~
~
_UI
a~
u:
OUl
io
:z:...
u...
;;;c
::
'"
a~
uu
.......
Cl_
OUl
"'0
'"
~~
...
~
-
'"
a~
uu
~:
'" UI
... -
zo
"'....
~~
~
z
a~
uu
:z:...
c-
o'"
Q-
ZO
C
z...
........
;;;c
!l i.
--.....
.o~-
> "Q.
.;. P
'; ~
~!:::.
0-. ~
...~ a.
.;
. .
';~~'-S
!~Q.l=
_ ,,!t !l
......w'-
> l-v; ~
..: li G: 5
"
Q
Q
Q
15
~
.,
Q
...
Q
Q
Q
.... .
N'
N
N
N
~:
~.. :
""'.. :
N .
Q
Q
Q
~
~.. :
~:
...
~
0... :
Cl'
....
.
Q
Q.
.
II
II
II
.
II
II
"
"
"
C; :
., .
. .
.... .
.
N.
. .
'" .
~ .
- .
.
.
II
.... II
~
~.
....
wi
Q
"
- II
Q "
., "
. .
.... .
- II
Nil
~H
- .
:
....
Q
...
",'
::;
",'
~1';
o I.
o
!l.~
-10-
~::i
..;H
...
:!
...
-0
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
i. .
s:
0:
Q
Q
Q
'0:
!';
- I.
. "
> .
on
Q
...
N..:
... .
:g. :
=:
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q Q
Q
'0
!.~
.1
>
..
..
0.: a':
'- '- ,c
!l "" li II
_.~~'g_ a.
. c- ~_.-
>';" ::~
'~1 . ~
CD .-
... .
~.
o ..
!l:::~
-110
. ..
>
. '5-v
c.li
...
..>>
o I.
d
-.<:
~I
N
.
:o~~.i .
" · 5
: !J] "
II _ :> '-
II. 0 U
->-"--=
:. e-"
.. - .-
.
II
~
C
Go ..
".c:~
u ...0 ~
z " "
_.....c:..
........_ca =
: ; ! I~ '"': ca
Olll!. u: ,.g
!iic .=: :'2
="'_u,.._ ~.
cz;.c:c- "',
,,:5-S~io "'0
II.-I""'::U .. ~-
"uca coo
dQZ -UXZ t...
==~:ou~c~o 'e
.. C"I.c- ->-, ot
It~ I..~_"" ....... C
~~~~c_u ~~: ~
Ita. ~ QIA o~
~:~~"2.s~~ ...~:
II ~. u .... ....
:~Ol~: u
:5 ~50
II Z
:
.,
N
..... ,
~.l
N:C;
...
Q Q
Q Q
Q
I::
....
N
...
-0
..,
... ,
g
....
N
5
..
.
~
o
u
l
s
~
u...
o
;~
a-
u
",. .
.~X'"
'" c'"
O~
. OCD
'.Q':: ~
~~~~
_U:::CUl
o '"
u
'"
'"
....
a..:
~:
::
Ie
.... .
:;;
~
~
Q
N
...
.o '
~ .
..,
N
N
N
Q.
~..
...
...
-
a
u
~
o
z
c
z
...
%
'"
~
c
g
15:
.0" :
... ,
....", :
- ,
Q
Q
Q
Q
...
a",
u_
~~
...'"
It-
co
%
a~
'"
Q
...
- .
N'
N
N
Q
Q
Q
...
....
....
...
...
a
u~
cu
z'"
c...
~~
...0
'"
-~
o~
e;c
Q
....
"".. :
g:
""'... :
N:
Q
Q
....
Q
""'.. :
....
N
...
Cl
...
'"
::~
z '"
a:n
u-
...0
'" ~
~~
!
..... .
~
Q
Q
....
....
Q
.o' ,
...
;~
_u
z -
a~
u'"
~o
"'~
a~
Q
Q Q
~
::c
.o
...
.,
.o'
N
-0
....
~
Q'
....
"'.
a;
Q
Q
Q
Q
N
...
.... .
....
~
...
.... .
1::'
Q
~
Q.
t>' .
N
...
u
..~
...'"
...-
zo
a",
~~
~:
......
....~
:u
;.::
_u
z-
a~
u'"
zo
...
'" ~
'" -'
cc
::II
-
-
....
~
. II
- II
.
"
II
II
Q "
... "
- .
. II
Q II
.... II
Cl II
,"
- II
t> :
.
II
"
- "
- "
.... "
."
I:: ::
- "
."
- "
"
II
"
"
II
.... II
N II
.... II
. II
..0 ~
"
"
II
~
"
~ ~
N..::
N "
.... "
~..::
.., .
.... "
~
II
....
N
....
.o'
N
- .
N.
. II
N"
:a ~
. II
~ ~
II
II
II
"
~ ~
., II
. II
Q .
.... .
GO.. :
- II
.
.
.
.
II
~ ~
""..::
o "
.... "
:.. ~
- ~
~
::
.
'"
~
'"
'"
c
~
c
g
o
z
c
'"
'"
...
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD MEMBI:RS
ON 11-1'- ell ..
(J1{!Aiila ~f~ No: ql, JI'S(/;.tc)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p, 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
0.'5. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
November 5, 1991
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently
under construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this
matter with them at the next meeting if they so desire.
Yours truly,
8, ~ ~~-ec7v''i: \ r
D. S. Roosevelt
Resident Engineer
DSR/smk
a ttachmen t
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
..
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
NOVEMBER 1, 1991
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
IROUTE I LOCATION I STATUS EST.COMP I
INO. I I DATE I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I I I I
1660 I BRIDGE OVER S. FORK RIVANNA RIVER I CONSTRUCTION 85% COMPLETE DEC 91 * I
I I I I
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
1743
I
I
I INT. ROUTE 606 NEAR AIRPORT
I
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
I
1250
I
I
I ST. CLAIR AVE. TO RTE. 64
I
CONSTRUCTION 13% COMPLETE
SEP 93
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
+------+-------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------+
* REVISED DATE
** NEW PROJECT
, !l-~"-(il
o;S,ti;lJUi~J \'" ~J3,1'{;: ,,l , iAr-i\
Ag~nda item No. :11:..1 J / 5..:1j-
/
.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA.
Ms. Kobby Hoffman
Thomas Jefferson Planning District
413 East Market street, suite 102
Charlottesville, VA 22901-5213
'."
-:tbd:} l~o.; ilts6-1934
Tele6npi!lel~) 786-3143
, FAX:"\a?~) i ~25-4261
NOV W ~9 II" I
1;1 l~ ~ I' ',I;
fr,.t
,- ~~"'f'( i l / ",
L~..",I i t Lfl'
^ ~ \.J i r . -...... \~~......
.~, -:>0 ,A,li\HIOJ
November 4, 1991
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Hugh G, Miller, Director
Commission
RE: Phase II Evaluations, Crozet crossing Project, Albemarle
County; VDHR File No. 5335-AB
Dear Ms. Hoffman:
We have received and reviewed the above-referenced evaluation
(Phase II) report. The document was prepared in October 1991 by
the Department of Anthropology, University of Virginia and was
written by Lynn Marie Pietak and Nina V. Weissberg. We received
our review copy on October 25. Our review of project documenta-
tion also includes consideration of the initial identification
survey (Phase I) report received earlier this year. We apologize
for not providing written comments on that previous report,
despite consistent timely submission of cultural resource docu-
mentation by the University of Virginia. We are sensitive to the
issues raised by Francis H. Fife in his letter of October 30 and
have attempted to expedite our review of the University's evalua-
tion report in order to avoid additional delay.
The identification and evaluation reports provide a description
of project goals, methods, fieldwork, results and recommenda-
tions. The level of effort and the resulting reports are consis-
tent with The Secretary of Interior's Standards for Archeoloqy
and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716 - 44742). The VDHR
ArChaeological Evaluation Committee reviewed the findings on
October 30, 1991 and concurred with the consultant's recommenda-
tion that sites 44AB319, 44AB392, and 44AB393 be considered
ineligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places due to their compromised integrity and low research poten-
tial. No further archaeological investigation is warranted for
the project.
Additional documentation provided by David Benish on November 1
has satisfactorily addressed the issues of vegetative screening
and access to the property which were raised in our letter to you
of November 27, 1990. Based upon this information and the
results of the archaeological evaluations discussed above, the
proposed development of the Crozet Crossing project will have no
effect on historic properties.
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact
Antony F. Opperman or Elizabeth Hoge of our staff. Thank you for
your cooperation.
H. Bry
Deputy
Preservation Officer
cc: Jeffrey L. Hantman, University of Virginia
Francis H. Fife, Charlottesville Housing Foundation
David B. Benish, Albemarle County
Frederick R. Bowie, Albemarle County Board of supervisors
Guy B. Agnor, Albemarle County Executive
Keith Rittenhouse, Albemarle County Planning Chairman
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Albemarle County Planning Director
Nancy K. O'Brien, Thomas Jefferson PDC
_c,-
t)i~l;b~jWu to BoaiC;-Ll-g t1.,
~~od' Item No. 'l.b1!.J.1(5..~)
...
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5875
,:)
November 7, 1991
Mr. Roger W. Ray
Roger W. Ray and Associates, Inc.
1717 Allied street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
RE: Official Determination of Number of Parcels - section 10.3.1
Tax Map 89, Parcel 81J
Dear Mr. Ray,
The County Attorney and I have reviewed the chain of title you
have submitted for the above-noted property. It is the County
Attorney's advisory opinion and my official determination that
this property consists of two (2) separate parcels: one
containing three (3) acres more or less; the other, containing
82.25 acres, more or less. Each of these lawfully separate
parcels is entitled to assocated development rights.
This determination considered the descriptive clauses of the
deed, which delineate and enumerate the property as consisting of
"two certain contiguous tracts or parcels of land". This
consideration is based on the findings of the Va. Supreme Court
in the case, Faison v. Union Camp 224 VA 54.
The most recent deed of record as of the date of adoption of the
zoning ordinance is fo~nd in Deed Book 524, Page 310. It is
dated January 22, 1973 from Frank B. Baldwin and Willian Gregory
Baldwin to Robert A. Monroe and Thomas C. McGowan. This deed
describes the following parcels:
l. Parcel X containing 3.00 acres more or less, and
2. a tract containing 82.25 acres, more or less
,
November 7, 1991
Parcel Determination
Page 2
Anyone aggrieved by this decision may file a written appeal
within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If you have
any questions, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
-1'~ l(~
John Grady
Deputy Zoning Administrator
bt
cc: Jan Sprinkle
Gay Carver
Estelle Neher, Clerk to the Board of supervisors
Reading Files
'~;:;tI'LJut(.'u !u bvaHr 11.:.J.:: {-j ,
Agenda Item No. .!i I", I / 13C5:~
"
.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Department of Labor and Industry
Broadmoor Plaza Office Center
Route 340, Suite 101
P. O. Box 650
Stuarts Draft, VA 24477
(703) 332-9240
-""',; t'
.'
'\.,; . i
~ l. ' "
',.' .-,
NOV 4 1891
,1'1
:1
I \ ~ "."
; \...'; :'~. :::::;' "-~.<.,' "':-:- ..
J: '
\ ~ I
~J {::- :'~~ L) ~:.-. L r~ V ~ ~~~\. ::":: ::~~.
November 6, 1991
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Sirs:
On November 6, 1991, the Virginia Occupational Safety and
Health Program received a notice of health hazards at your
worksite at the Charlottesville Emergency Operators' Center. The
specific nature of the alleged hazards is as follows: Employees
exposed to automotive exhaust emissions coming into facility's
air intake ducts. Employees experiencing headaches, eye, nose and
throat irritation.
We have not determined whether the hazards, as alleged,
exist at your workplace; and we are not conducting an inspection
at this time. However, since allegations have been made, you
should investigate the alleged condition(s) and make any
necessary corrections or modifications. Within 21 days of your
receipt of this letter please advise me in writing of your
findings and of the action you have taken to correct any
hazards. Please enclose any supporting documentation on the
action you have taken, such as monitoring results, new equipment,
orders and the like, as well as photograph(s) of the corrected
condition.
The complainant involved has been advised of this
preliminary response to the complaint of hazards and furnished a
copy of this letter. Section 40.1-51.2:1 of the Labor Laws of
Virginia provides that "no persons shall discharge or in any way
discriminate against an employee because the employee has filed a
safety or health complaint or has testified or otherwise acted to
exercise rights under the safety and health provisions of this
title for themselves or others."
This letter is not a citation or a notification of proposed
penalty. If we do not receive a response from you within 21
days indicating that appropriate action has been taken or that no
hazard exists and why, an inspection may be conducted.
.
.
Page 2
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
November 6, 1991
In addition, VOSH's policy is to select for inspection a
random sample of cases where we have received letters in which
employers have indicated satisfactory corrective action to ensure
that the employer has actually taken the action asserted in his
letter.
Finally, any action taken by you in this matter will not
automatically remove your workplace from the possibility of an
unannounced inspection by duly authorized representatives of VOSH
in accordance with routine scheduling procedures currently in
effect.
You are requested to post a copy of this letter and your
response to it where it will be readily accessible for review by
all of your employees.
In addition to its function of inspecting workplaces, the
VOSH Regional Office has been expanded to become a full service
resource center, offering a wide range of safety and health
related services in response to the needs of the working public,
both employers and employees. These services include training
and education, consultation, voluntary compliance programs and
assistance in correcting hazards.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact our Area Office at the address in the letterhead. Your
personal support and interest in the safety and health of your
employees is appreciated.
Sincerely,
~d. O-~l
Charles L. Clouse /~
Regional Supervisor
Division of Occupational Health
Northwest Region
CLC/kbn
~":-,If lJi:l" , ':\,., I'" I (- V'. 9/
, "".... \,- - ,...a \,,;. ~-!..4.- ""'.,.:'............
.~.'~W'Nll ,1!ft.n' 11I11.. i.q.. ~ 'lJj3(6.~g
11)1""IY'I.',f,.\I'~I.~
\,.\., , .' 1.... ,'\,,_,'~__l.':, ,r\L_l
.4(
ADELPHIA CABLE f;U) ~'.:.-'; (';'1 C::J
C,O, M. M'U' N.I'C.A'T.I'O'N'S v'f-~~~']
I I i\ \
/' 1\ " i'l................qc".
.J..-.ll,,,"::.t L.~:.~J ~~:':1
1991
11 !
i ~ i
., :!
'. \ ~,~)
October 30, 1891.
Mr. F. R. Bowie, Chairman
County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22801
Dear Mr. Bowie:
In December of 1880, Adelphia announced the formation of
a new level of service called Economy. This level of service
provides subscribers Channels 2 through 13, plus channels 14-
BET, 18-ESPN, 19-C-SPAN, 23-CNBC/ACTS Network and 24-The
Family Channel.
On September 16, Adelphia added The Prevue Guide on a
part-time basis on Channel 15. This service is on when pay-
per-view special events are not scheduled.
Adelphia is happy to now announce the unscrambling of
three additional services as of November 1, 1991. They are
Channels 20-USA, 33-Home Team Sports, and 35-The Discovery
Channel. These services, which were available only to our
Standard level of service subscribers, will now also be
available to our Economy level of service sllbscribers. Any
subscriber who has a cable-ready set, VCR, or who has
acquired from Adelphia a new addressable converter, will be
able to receive these additional channels.
This is another step by Adelphia that will make its system
more compatible with its subscribers' personal equipment.
Rates will remain the same at $14.00 per month.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me.
Sincerely,
/ ,i- '\
~~_.. .. l, L--\..\. \),..-./
r-_..~~' C'----:> "--/\.'1,......... '. '-...
"
DAH/dm
Delmas A. Hanley
General Manager
""\
~ ...-}----........
.../:
324 W. Main Street, P.O. Box 1279, Charlottesville. Virginia 22901. (804) 296-4154
J;slribulea to fll)31G: 11- f ~'j J
l\genda item No. tJ/" i1l, 3"/z..'9..0
Edward H. Bain. Jr
Samuel Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229014596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Charlotte Y Humphris
,Jdck ,JOUi2tt
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F Perkins
Whitl' Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk,
CMC~
DATE: November 8, 1991
SUBJECT: Reading List for November 13, 1991
July 17, 1991 - All - Mr. Bain
May 8, 1991 - pages 1 - 19 (#7c) - Mrs. Humphris
pages 19 (#7c) - 34 (#19) - Mr. Bowerman
pages 34 (#19) - 46 (#27) - Mr. Bain
LEN:ec
I
I I
i
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
({fIve nt b u
11 J /tlvJ
.
4/.07/0, 131
~) /
I t !"/I{/fj
I
/)7 11/('
/) {' (!
II
/) ! ~lp6 :')/' h c~
I
/tV
/)(.-( tilt
!
h t' Ci/f.. { II q t} l
j
I .
V(; [;' &( h t.y) il, 1 ICe 1
""
t~~
~-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
< ., . "<,' II-g-71
jl.~.iw.,\oIt t'J .."b.A...... ,._,' ...'.~
~'?Ma item htJ. t(/~ () 7/tJ./ ~ 1.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors ~I
County Executive~;r-
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
November 7, 1991
Disposition of Peyton Drive
With your approval of extending Commonwealth Drive through to
Greenbrier Drive, the staff has examined the status of Peyton
Drive.
Peyton Drive from Commonwealth Drive to Greenbrier Drive was
dedicated to public use in 1968. Enclosure (1) identifies six
parcels adjoining this segment of Peyton Drive of which only parcel
numbers 7, 16 and 18 are currently developed. Parcels 4, 5 and 6
are undeveloped. All the developed parcels have access to either
Greenbrier Drive or Commonwealth Drive and thus do not require
access to Peyton Drive but access to parcel number 5 must be
maintained through Peyton Drive. In addition, Comdial uses Peyton
Drive for employee vehicle access through a side entrance. A
meeting with Comdial representatives indicates this access is used
by their employees in the mornings and afternoons and is a
significant factor in reducing congestion and traffic flow on
Greenbrier Drive. Comdial prefers all of Peyton remain open but at
a minimum wants access to Commonwealth Drive or Greenbrier Drive
via Peyton Drive.
As parcel 5 is almost directly across from the Comdial entrance,
either a northern or southern access is possible. Staff's analysis
of the traffic flows and road condition supports access be
maintained to Commonwealth Drive and not to Greenbrier Drive.
Staff recommends the following:
o Set a public hearing for December 11, 1991, to vacate
the Peyton Drive public right-of-way from Commonwealth
Drive to Greenbrier Drive;
o Prevent access on Peyton Drive by a barricade at both
Greenbrier Drive and the southern portion of parcel 5;
~
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
November 7, 1991
RE: Disposition of Peyton Drive
Page 2
o Remove the road bed between these barricades; and
o Resurface the remaining portion of Peyton Drive
between the Comdial entrance and Commonwealth Drive.
The above referenced work is intended to be done in conjunction
with the construction of Commonwealth Drive and funding is
available in the Commonwealth Drive project.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.194
Enclosures
I
f
\,
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form.3
7/25/86
/\ If ,. t rvt h-<-< /:3 I /9 ~~ /
I ~
9 I 1/ 1.3. ") I /
/ a/-r j/tLk 1l-k,,:J Lf /j 1-/ j)( c J<-)(U~ /z.~
'l1/"IJ i ,~) / I
v ~ Z 0 , I ?7f - & Y /vt r 'll,-<.1' ell S e...<.".s5.( :--..."
. ",.. .....o,. Ii -8, Y/'
Q'
~"dJo ".:"1 ~J. iJ.:.J!..1 ~.:.:':.7< IJj
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~}~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive~'v!
November 7, 1991
Draft Remarks to Secretary Milliken's Proposed
Improvements to Transportation Services
The attached is a draft of the County's position on Secretary
Milliken's proposed changes to improve transportation services in
Virginia. The Commonwealth Transportation Board has requested
comments on the proposals be submitted by December 15, 1991 and
solicits comments at various public meetings, the closest of which
is in Richmond, Virginia on November 26th.
I request the Board review the attached statement and provide me
any comments so that a revised statement can be prepared for
presentation at the public meeting.
If a member of the Board is not available to present these remarks
at the public meeting, I propose to send a staff member to do so.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.195
DRAFT
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Remarks on Secretary Milliken's Proposed
Improvements to Transportation Services
November 26, 1991
On behalf of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, I
appreciate the opportunity to address Secretary Milliken's proposal
for improvements to transportation services in the Commonwealth.
Albemarle County continues to maintain funding of transportation
improvements as a top priority and looks forward to any initiatives
to increase our flexibility in managing our transportation needs.
Wi th this perspective in mind, I would like to comment on the
proposals. These remarks must be taken with some caution as we
have not been informed of the details of the individual proposals
and thus cannot fully assess their impact at the county level. In
general, any proposal that purports to improve county flexibility
and responsibility but lacks legislative authority and resources is
considered to be counterproductive. Shifting the burden of funding
is not a viable solution. The County stands ready to assume
greater responsibility when the resources and authority are also
provided from the Commonwealth.
In response to the specific proposals:
o Establishing a separate state agency for rail and public
transportation is not supported. Creating another agency adds to
the regulatory and bureaucratic processes with little improvement
in services. The focus should continue to be on streamlining
government services, not proliferating more agencies. Wi thout
further justification, it is difficult to see the benefit to this
proposal except enhancing the ability of the rail and public
transportation to sub-optimize service and further compete for
already scarce resources at the state and federal level.
o Assuming more responsibility for certain secondary highway
functions is a double edged sword. Having more control over
meeting our secondary highway needs is supported but doing so will
require additional county resources unless increased state funding
follows. This is readily apparent if the County were to assume
responsibility for design, maintenance and installation of traffic
control devices as suggested by Secretary Milliken. Albemarle
County does not have qualified staff to perform this function and
this may have to forego the opportunity to assume more
responsibility in the secondary highway system.
o Improving revenue sharing dollars and raising the ceiling is
supported as an opportunity for the County to increase our
construction of secondary roads but this should not come at the
expense of local funding or reduced funding of the non-revenue
sharing portion of the Commonwealth's secondary road program. If
this were done, it would further shift the fiscal burden to the
locality and is one more example of the County paying the price for
services primarily provided by the Commonwealth.
o Establishing incentives for rural transportation planning
cannot be evaluated without further information. Although it may
not directly improve transportation services within Albemarle
County, as transportation planning is currently done at the local
level, there may be indirect benefits through improvements in
transportation services on the part of all our adjacent rural
counties.
o Lastly, requiring Albemarle County to fund a greater cost of
new secondary road construction is not supported. While such a
proposal will stretch the Commonwealth's limited dollars, the
ability to actually see an increase in construction of new
secondary roads is unlikely. The reason is simple, Albemarle
County cannot continue to absorb more state mandates on the one
hand while the State reduces funding of these mandates on the other
hand. This is happening across a broad spectrum of state programs
which is having a cumulative adverse impact on county taxpayers.
Without greater revenue generating authority, the burden will
continue to be borne by taxpayers owning real and personal
property. This is not an unlimited source of local funding. The
unfortunate outcome of this proposal will be a reduction in the
rate of transportation improvements.
In summary, transportation improvements are needed but not at the
expense of the local taxpayer. Albemarle County is a willing
participant in seeking improvements but further review and
assessment of these proposals requires more information. We look
forward to an opportunity to work with the Transportation Board and
Department in seeking solutions.
Thank you for the opportunity to present our comments.
/I - J .liI
(-I I 'I' / I ~ ,,'\
;,1 (Jr,: "p.-' I)
COMMONWEALTH of Vlij,(j-INIA "
October 17, 1991
'C.,! I
1::'/1 nCyr "11 '" '; ,;\1
! I: ~ \ \..., .\'.1 l'~:\Jl
: ,,'~ I, , (804) 786-8032
"\ I}~~_:"~,,, ' ",,"--' /rpp~(~) 786-7765
- - , :. i. U :....::._: I';
r ~ () ,t'\ {~: [) :.:' ~ :
t.~ ; 1 \/ .' ,:.:; ':~: c::~
John G Milliken
Secretary of Transportation
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
At the annual conference of the Virginia Municipal League on October 8, I outlined
several proposals to improve the delivery of transportation services in the Commonwealth.
The Commonwealth Transportation Board, under my direction, has scheduled five public
meetings for soliciting input from public officials and citizens before final recommendations
are developed for submission to the Governor and the General Assembly. The meeting
schedule is attached.
The proposals include:
* Establishing VDOT's Rail and Public Transportation Division as a separate
state agency, reporting to the Secretary of Transportation and the
Commonwealth Transportation Board.
* Permitting counties, under agreement with VDOT, to assume responsibility
for certain transportation functions and decisions on the state's secondary
highway system, including entrances to secondary roads, through truck
restrictions, speed limits, and justification, design, maintenance and
installation of traffic control devices.
* Improving the transportation revenue sharing program by raising the total
state appropriation to $15 million, increasing per-jurisdiction ceiling to
$650,000, and extending the eligibility to cities for use on urban and
interstate projects.
* Establishing a fund to provide an incentive for rural transportation planning
through the planning districts or other appropriate entities in rural areas.
* Requiring new urban street and secondary road construction to be financed
jointly by the state and local governments on an 80%/20% match basis,
with the state's 80% share being provided under the current secondary
road allocation formula.
Written comments will be accepted at any time but to ensure their consideration in
the formulation of recommendations, they should be received by December 15, 1991.
Written statements should be addressed to P. O. Box 1475, Richmond, Virgini~ 23212.
John G. Milliken
The Commonwealth Transportation Board has scheduled five public meetings to address
proposals to improve the delivery of transportation services in the Commonwealth, The
meetings, all of which begin at 7:00 p.m. will be held on the following dates:
Tuesday, November 12
Virginia Department of Transportation
Suffolk District Office Auditorium
1700 N. Main Street
Suffolk
Tuesday, November 19
Virginia Department of Transportation
Bristol District Office Auditorium
Bonham Road, 1 mile south of Route 11
Bristol
Thursday, November 21
Fairfax High School
3500 Old Lee Highway
Fairfax
Monday, November 25
Virginia Western Community College Auditorium
3095 Colonial Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke
Tuesday, November 26
Virginia Department of Transportation
Central Office Auditorium
1221 E. Broad Street
Richmond
Virginia AssociatioDof Counties
1001 E. Broad St. . Suite LL 20 . Richmond, Va. . 23219-1901
(804) 788-6652 . FAX 788-0083
Leg is,'iiil~e
Alert
House panel discusses
impact fees for education
On Oct. 10, a subcommit-
tee of the Byrne Commis-
sion studying impact fees
met to discuss possible
changes to legislation
effective July 1990 that
allows road impact fees in
Northern Virginia.
Chaired by Del. C.
Richard Cranwell (D-
Roanoke County), the subcommittee discussed the use
of proffers as credits and the imposition of conditional
zoning in the impact fee process.
Counties interested in
impact fees for education
need to contact Flip Hicks
at (804) 788-6652 as soon
as possible.
impact fee authority for
new school construction is
even more critical. Had
Chesterfield County had
the authority to enact
impact fees for education,
$7.9 million could have
been generated for
education since 1989
based on the number of
building permits issued during that time.
Lane Ramsey and Jay Stegmeier of Chesterfield County
made a presentation to the subcommittee on how impact
fee authority would affect Chesterfield County. They
stated that although road impact fees would reduce the
county's burden for funding transportation projects,
Cranwell announced at the end of the meeting that any
other localities interested in education impact fees need
to make their concerns known before the subcommittee
meets again the week of Nov. 18. Contact Flip Hicks at
V ACo as soon as possible if your county is interested in
impact fees for education, so that he can communicate
your interest to the Byrne subcommittee.
Milliken's transportation
proposals to be discussed
Speaking at the VML conference on Oct. 8, Secretary of
Transportation John Milliken proposed that secondary
road construction be financed jointly by the state and
local governments on an 80 percent to 20 percent basis,
with the state's 80 percent share being provided under
the current secondary road allocation formula. This
proposal reverses a policy in existence since 1932, with
the state assuming all construction costs of secondary
roads in counties.
To solicit comments on this and other proposals in its
Blueprint for Transportation, the Commonwealth
Transportation Board has scheduled meetings through-
out the state.
County officials are urged to attend these meetings and
make their voices heard because the proposal requires
counties to contribute funds of20 percent
The meetings are scheduled at 7 p.m. on these dates:
Tuesday, Nov. 12- VrrginiaDepartmentof
Transportation, Suffolk District Office auditorium,
1700 N. Main St in Suffolk
Tuesday, Nov. 19 - VDOT Bristol District Office
auditorium, Bonham Road. 1 mile south of Route 11, in
Bristol
Thursday, Nov. 21 - Fairfax County High School,
3500 Old Lee Highway in Fairfax
Monday, Nov. 25 - Salem District Office audito-
rium, Harrison Avenue, north of Main Street and east
of Route 311, in Salem
Tuesday, Nov. 26 - Central Office auditorium, 1221
E. Broad St. in Richmond
· continued on page 2 ·
Meetings focus on fees for waste
management permit applications
The Department of Waste Management has scheduled a series of
public meetings to acquaint local governments and the public with
its draft regulations to impose fees for the review of permit
applications for waste management facilities.
The draft regulations would impose fees ranging from $12,500 to
$17,500 for parts A and B of a permit application. According to the
department, service levels will vary according to the fee that is
finally charged. For instance, a fee of $12,500 will enable the
department to add nine people to its permitting staff in the 1992-93
fiscal year and to add five more people during the second year of
the biennium. Staffing at this level will not enable the department
to issue all the permits by the statutory deadline ofJ an. 1, 1994. Of
150 landfIlls, about 50 will miss the deadline.
If a fee of $15 ,000 is charged, onI y about 20 landfills will miss the
deadline. A feeof$17,500, according to the Department of Waste
Management, should allow all permit applications to be completed
on time.
The Virginia Association of Counties opposes these proposed
regulations and urges local officials to attend these meetings ready
to make comments. The department has mailed a copy of the draft
regulations to the localities along with an announcement of the
meeting schedule.
The meetings are scheduled for 10 a.m. on these dates:
Monday, Oct. 28-HolidayInn 1776, U.S. 60 Bypass Road in
Williamsburg
Monday, Nov. 4 - Roanoke County Administrative Center, 3737
Brambleton Ave. S.W. in Roanoke
Tuesday, Nov. 12-Holiday Inn South, U.S. 1 and 1-95 in
Fredericksburg
Hearing scheduled for public
employee collective bargaining
A public hearing on collective bargaining by public employees is
scheduled at 7:30 p.m. on Nov. 6 at the Quality Inn-Lake Wright in
Norfolk, 6280 Northampton Blvd.
A special subcommittee studying SB 893, from the 1991 General
Assembly, met for the first time Oct. 3. The bill the subcommittee
is studying sought to amend the Code of Virginia to give employ-
ees of cities, counties, towns and other political subdivisions the
right to form, join or assist employee associations or labor organi-
zations. The bill contained language that local governments shall
not be prohibited from "meeting and conferring" with such
Transportation
· continued from front page ·
Other proposals being considered include:
· Permitting counties, under agreement with VDOT, to assume
responsibility for certain transportation functions and deci-
sions on the state's secondary highway system, including
entrances to secondary roads, through truck restrictions, speed
limits, and justification, design, maintenance and installation
of traffic control devices.
· Establishing VDOT's Rail and Public Transportation Division
as a separate state agency, reporting to the secretary of
transportation and the Commonwealth Transportation Board.
· Increasing municipalities' flexibility in the use of city street
payments to meet local transportation needs.
employee representatives or from arriving at "agreements"
respecting the employees' terms and conditions of employment.
The amended bill also stated that employees do not have the right
to strike.
At the Oct. 3 meeting, V ACo, VML, the Virginia School Boards
Association, the Virginia Chapter of the International Personnel
Management Association and the Virginia Retail Merchants
Association spoke in opposition to the bill. County officials are
urged to follow this issue closely and to attend the public hearing to
speak against this bill.
· Improving the transportation revenue sharing program by
raising the total state appropriation to $15 million, increasing
per jurism,ction ceiling to $650,000 and extending the eligibil-
ity to cities for use on urban and interstate projects.
· Establishing a fund to provide an incentive for rural transpor-
tation planning through the planning.districts or other appro-
priate entities.
Milliken is scheduled to speak with county officials during
VACo's Annual Meeting from 10:15 to 11:15 a.m. on Nov. 11 at
The Homestead. He will also address V ACo 's Transportation
Steering Committee, which will meet at 2:30 p.m. on Nov. 10 at
TI1e Homestead.
Any questions on these meetings may be directed to Larry Land,
V ACo staff member, at (804) 788-6652.
DATE
'/
It I clV'-e rv, i c..(,V
,
is, /11/
AGENDA ITEM NO.
9;' ;//3. '771
71/ 7. 9 A/Ie 1/1". f,'vt' / C
,,1(uv.
.. '/\,r. ;)0" (/ (;/' (.f' / J:1_ I! I
~ Ili Tt",1' "'fu1
I
AGENDA ITEM NAME
DEFERRED UNTIL
,
cl5 t!.<JS':;,/;,---,
Form. 3
7/25/86
iJl.;,;...IIUUi,,\:iU t.v oua'(J~ I j
A['enda Item No. (!I./1 /3 r; 7 '1_J...
...
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
John G, Milliken
Secretary ot Transportation
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
,',:"':;:1.[
':' '! '--i
. ',~~j 786-8032
., ;~81TDD (~) f86-7765
,':: ,I
November 4, 1991
, 'i
i' '>>.
\.,;
".": 1:' ~:\: \/ ; "':
The Honorable F. R. Bowie
Chairman, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Chairman Bowie:
This letter is intended to reply in more detail to your
letter of August 1. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB)
is committed to the sequence of construction as set forth in the
CTB's November 15, 1990, resolution.
The CATS Plan is an approved Plan for the Charlottesville -
Albemarle County area and it is the intent of the Department and
the CTB to carry out that Plan as funding on the primary system
becomes available. To keep the Plan on schedule, however, it
will be necessary for the City of Charlottesville to keep its
projects at a high priority and for Albemarle County to schedule
the secondary projects in the CATS Plan.
It was never the intent of the CTB or the Department that
the CATS Plan not be carried out as currently proposed, provided
funding was available. However, the Department and the CTB
believe that a Route 29 Bypass is an integral and important part
of the regional tran~portation plan and will be needed in the
future, even with the implementation of the CATS Plan.
with those general comments in mind, I would like to review
the status of the three phases included in the CTB's November 15,
1990, resolution which were also addressed in your letter of
August 1.
Phase I. Short-ranqe Recommendations: The widening of Existing
Route 29 to six lanes with continuous right-turn lanes from the
Route 250 Bypass to the South Fork of the Rivanna River will be
accomplished by two projects as shown on Page 38 (Items 3 and 4)
of the 1991-92 Six-Year Improvement Program. The first project
from the Route 250 Bypass to Rio Road is scheduled for
construction in July 1993 and the second project, from Rio Road
to the river, is scheduled for advertisement in July 1994, all
subject to available funding. The design work is currently
underway.
"If
~
The Honorable F. R. Bowie
November 4, 1991
Page Two
As additional funding becomes available and scheduling
permits, a design will be prepared for three interchanges to be
added to the Base Case. The design of these interchanges is, of
course, subject to public hearings and CTB approval. The
preservation and acquisition of right-of-way for each element of
the Plan was part of Phase I. If this Plan is to succeed the
County and the City must do everything possible to preserve the
right-of-way required for the construction of the Base Case, the
three interchanges and the Line 10 Corridor approved by the CTB.
The refin~ment of Alternative 10 is currently underway, and
a preliminary plan (functional plan) will be provided to
Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville to assist in the
preservation of right-of-way along that corridor.
After the design has been approved and right-of-way plans
are prepared, and subject to available funding, VDOT will
consider acquiring property which meets the Department's
requirements for advanced right-of-way acquisition along
Alternative 10.
In order to work with the County in the protection of the
watershed, access points on Alternative 10 will be limited to
those approved by the CTB when the corridor was designated,
unless additional access is requested by the local government.
Phase II. Medium-ranqe Recommendations: Three grade-separated
interchanges along Rio Road, Greenbrier Drive and Hydraulic Road
will be built when traffic conditions dictate and funding is
available. The construction of each interchange is subject to
approval of the design after public hearings are held during
Phase I so that right-of-way for the interchanges can be
preserved.
Phase III. Lonq-ranqe Recommendations: It is the intent of the
CTB and the Department to construct Alternative 10 when traffic
on Route 29 becomes unacceptable and funding permits.
You asked us to consider how this commitment to the CATS
Plan and the phasing of projects might be solidified. The
following sequence of activity spells out that commitment and I
would be pleased to seek CTB ratification of this specific
sequencing if the Board of Supervisors requests I do so. Of
course, the commitment of the Board and the City Council to each
do its part is necessary as well.
1. The widening of Route 29 to six lanes, with
continuous right lanes from the Route 250
Bypass to the south fork of the Rivanna
River. This is currently being designed.
~
~
The Honorable F. R. Bowie
November 4, 1991
Page Three
2. The remainder of Phase I contained in the
CTB's resolution of November 15, 1990.
3. The completion of the Meadowcreek Parkway
from the Route 250 Bypass to Route 29 north
as urban and secondary road funding becomes
available for the facility's right-of-way
acquisition and construction cost.
4. The construction of the interchanges on Route
29 north at Rio Road, Hydraulic Road and
Greenbrier Drive as traffic demands and
funding permits.
5. The preservation and acquisition of right-
of-way for Alternative 10. This will be
accomplished as funding is available for this
established corridor's right-of-way
acquisition and construction.
In closing, I trust that this letter assures the County of
the Department's and the Commonwealth Transportation Board's
commitment to the construction of the CATS Plan and that the
County will assist the Department in preserving right-of-way for
the approved corridor for the Route 29 Bypass.
If the contents of this letter meet with your approval and
if the County wishes to move forwa d with the preservation of
necessary right-of-way, I would be pleased to bring the attached
draft resolution before the CTB fo its con9firrence.
/ Sin erely,
L ~ t1// ~^'~
ohn G. ~f liken
JGMjcmg
Attachment
cc: Ms. Constance R. Kincheloe
Mr. Ray D. Pethtel
Richard L. Walton, Jr., Esquire
v ~ _l
~
Moved by
, Seconded by
, that
WHEREAS, in accordance with the statutes of the Commonwealth
of Virginia and policies of the Commonwealth Transportation Board,
the Commonwealth Transportation Board by resolution dated November
15, 1990, approved the location of Project 6029-002-122, PE-100 in
three phases; and
WHEREAS, the three phases provided for short range, medium
range, and long range recommendations for the construction of the
project in conjunction with other projects in the city of
Charlottesville and Albemarle County; and
WHEREAS, by letter dated August 1, 1991, the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors has requested that this Board take positive
steps to commit to the priorities which were set forth in the
Board's resolution of November 15, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Board believes that the orderly development and
funding of the various projects in accordance with the three phases
as set forth in the Board's resolution of November 15, 1990, is in
the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the Board recognizes that state and local
transportation priorities should be harmonized where possible; and
WHEREAS, it is the sense of this Board that the Department of
Transportation adhere to the schedule of improvements as set forth
in the November 15, 1990, resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Board strongly believes that the Route 29 Bypass
(Alternative 10) should be constructed in concert with the
construction of the CATS Plan; now therefore
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commonwealth Transportation Board
direct the Department of Transportation to take all steps and make
~. +
all effort to complete the projects approved in its resolution of
November 15, 1990, as more fully set out in a letter to F. R. Bowie
dated November 4, 1991, from John G. Milliken, which is attached
hereto and made a part of this resolution.
.
~
1
.
~
..
n~~~,,;1 ",J .. 1 \ -II') q
;"",J,Cd.';U ,0 .,r,<tl~',r-", - ifs, I.
. .. <..v'" "j...,. __..........---.,... "~
, . ~ :",,; \ .9.L ,LLQ._ ,"-~~s)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p, 0, BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
October 8, 1991
1990-91 Secondary Budget
Albemarle County
Fiscal Summary
Miss Lettie E. Neher, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Miss Neher:
Attached you will find the summary of expenditures of improvement funds on the secondary
system in fiscal year 1990-91. I request that this information be transmitted to the Board
of Supervisors in accordance with the Code of Virginia.
This report is divided into two sections. The first section involves incidental
improvements. These are projects which can be financed and completed usually within a single
fiscal year. They cover the county-wide items such as new entrance pipe and new signs as
well as plant mix surfacing when it is done as an improvement. There is a balance of
$346,806.47. This is due primarily to funds allocated for rural additions which has balance
of $188,731.17. The balances will be carried forward for these items.
The second section lists improvements classed as numbered projects. These are projects
financed over a long period of time and usually take a long period of time to develop and
construct. Ye finished the fiscal year with a balance of approximately $3,635,000. Several
projects have large balances and the approximate figures follow: Meadow Creek Parkway
$660,000; Fifth Street Extended $1.5 million; Route 743 and Route 606 intersection at the
airport $540,000; and Route 678 at Ivy $435,000. Until some of the larger projects (such as
Fifth Street Extended) are under construction, I anticipate there will be an appreciable
balance remaining in the secondary improvement fund.
If there are any questions concerning this matter, I will be available to anSI,rer them at
a future Board meeting.
Yours truly,
~.a. eLL
J. A. Echols
Assistant Resident Engineer
JAE/smk
attachment
~c: T. F. Farley w/attachment
G. E. Fisher w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
<<
Mr. D. S. Roosevelt
&~ f//iJ/91
January 30, 1991
RECEIVED
# 7SJA./ /)~ ~
,f !\.~,! ~, '''91
"~"'d . a\ i'2J:. ~
CHARLOTTf:svn ! ~ \1/\
REC'11)K::/\'I"',- =':- --, ., i'-\
v ...' j, ,..;, -'-,",,_
- '... ,,,..;rr'~;f::,
Hr. Roger Flint
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.
P. O. Box 9035
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-9035
RE: TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Route 29 @ Route 866 (Greenbrier Drive)
Albemarle County
Dear Hr. Flint:
Your letter of 1-18-91 to Hr. D. S. Roosevelt has been forwarded to t11is
office for response since ~lC are responsible for the maintenance and operation
of all traffic signals in Albemarle County outside the City of
Charlot tesvi lIe. For your information, these traffic signals are checked
monthly during both am and pm peak hours to insure that the most efficient
timings are in operation which take into account fluctuatin[; traffic demands.
As I am sure you are aware, the Route 29 traffic signals are part of a signal
system that extends from the Charlottesville City Limits at Hydraulic Road to
the traffic signal at Woodbrook Drive (Route 1417). This signal system "las
installed and operates to insure minimum delays on Route 29 and to create a
"green band" for motorists on Route 29 during the am and pm peak hours. In
essence, the establishment of a traffic signal system on any arterial road
means that the arterial roadw'ay must be given preferential treatment and
l3idestreets will experience additional delay. This office has on numerous
occasions experimented with alternative phasing on Greenbrier Drive including
split phasing - i.e., letting Greenbrier east go at one time and Greenbrier
west at another - but due to the traffic demands on Route 29, it has been
shown that this l,Ti11 not reduce the backups on Greenbrier Drive but will, in
fact, increase them. Most complaints this office receives concern sidestreet
delay and requests to reduce the backups on Greenbrier Drive.
Your letter states that you are not conc~rned with the backup of traffic on
Greenbrier Drive but as you stated, you are concerned about the "near brushes
with possible death dealing accidents". This intersection has not been listed
as an accident prone location either by VDOT or the Virginia State Police.
However, I will request accident data for 1990 so that we can determine
whether or not ti:lis location is experiencing more accidents than can be
anticipated at a location of this type. Once this information has been
received and our analysis completed, I will inform you of the results.
Mr. Roger Flint
Page 2
..
Thank you for your interest in traffic safety, and you should be hearing from
C~ by the end of February.
JCD: s s
ver~Y-)'=,-
--- '
on C. DuFresne
istrict Traffic Engineer
cc: Mr. A. L. Thonas, Jr.
Mr. D. S. Roosevelt
Mr. D. S. Roosevelt
February 12, 1991
~~IV~~
~ 4 1991 ~
-Yr
CHARLOTTE~VILLE VA
RESIDENCE OFFICE
Mr. Roger Flint
Pepsi-Cola Bott.1ing Co.
P. O. Box 9035
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-9035
RE: ACCIDENT STDDY
Route 29 @ Route 866 (Greenbrier Drive)
Albe!ll8rle County
Df!ar Mr. FHn t:
As I stated in my 1-30-91 letter to you regarding the operation of the traffic
signal at the intersection of Route 29 and Grp.enbrier Drive, this office has
performed an accident analysis at that intersection. According to our
records, there have been a total of 18 accidents at this location during the
11 month period 1-1-90 thru 11-30-90. Of these accidents, only four involved
vehicles on Graenbrier Drive which were attempting to enter or cross Route 29.
These four accidents are as follows:
1. A vehicle ran the red on Routp. 29 and struck a vehicle crossine from
Greenbrier Drive.
2. A vehicle on Greenbrier Drive ran the red and was strHclc by a v~hicle on
R()ute 29.
3. A vehicle was caught in the crossover when the signal cha'lged and vas
struck by a Route 29 v~hicle as the m0tOrlst tried tn continue crossing
Route 29. (lie have an all red clearance interval to allow vehicles to
clear th9 middle of the intArsection, but in this instance either onB
motorist waited too long or the other motorist "jumped the green").
4. There was It rear. end collision on Greenbrier Drivp.
Of the remaining 14 accidents, all involved vehicles using Route 29 and they
included nine rear end collisions, three sideswipes (lane changes), and two
involved vehicles making left turns from Route 29 which were struck by thru
vehicles, (i.e., one of those vehicles ran a red light).
These accident statistics do not support the contention that vehicles on
Greenbrier Drive are being exposed to death dealing accidents - particularly
in view of the volume of traffic negotiating this intersection daily. In
fact, it is d01!btful that signal changes could hav~ prevented any of th.:!
accidents occurring with Greenbrier motor.ists in 1990. The basic problem at
this intcrsecthn is congestion and th~ fact that there. are more vehicl--~.1
using the intersection than it has capacity to serve. The only real solution
is construction of additional traffic lanes, and as I am sure you are aware,
the Department has been working toward that goal for several years. Please be
-'
Mr. Roger Flint
Page 2
assured that we do everything possible to make all of the intersections along
the Route 29 corridor as safe as possible.
If you have any questions regarding this information, pleas0. 0~ not h2sitate
to contact me at 703-829-7611.
'--------.
~,\,
/'VV 1X/J..,~_
gineer
JCD : s s
cc: Mr. D. S. Roose~e1t
'~',.
.,
AL BEMARL E CO.
ROUTE 29/8bb
I I
I
I I
I I ~~
I ~-
I I ~G1
~ I I I ~o
I ~
" I I I
~ I I
~ I
~ I
~ I
!
"---
~@~
r--\
=<
~
\-:::
~
..jVJ
.....J~
~~
"C/)
1
~
J
l
I
I
i I
@
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
!: I r
t53
D
r-
?':
"0
~
(J:)
<4.
~
DATE
.\
~ ) / If'A... 1'<. I IC,), I
,0 (/'v- \"v~ )<. '- -) \
AGENDA ITEM NAME
1'1. II (~, 773
~ "'^-<^ lJ.ch< ~
'A'p ())-cJ
AGENDA ITEM NO.
DEFERRED UNTIL
t~ C2 \ \
Form. 3
7/25/86
\
"1';' ':".; , " q;-:3i;-~~
' JU'O; ~", .' ,'. I;' ,"",. .
:l( I ~ . 'J \.'~ . .'. , .: - _ .'. . " .. .. . - .. e ' . .
f~.fl.~;;i,;;.)~....t~ ~' J~ .
~\.{!
OCT 10 1991
PLANNING DIVISION
Octobe-r.9.,1991
..~,.'"",
Wayne Cilimberg
Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Office Bldg.
401 McIntyre
Charlottesville,VA
Dear Mr. Cilimberg and the Board of Supervisors,
I would like to appea~he Planning Commissions decision
with regards to my Plat. I am trying to subdivide this
property, so that I will be able to build on my land, andjkeep
it in my name.
Basically, this plat is located on the Rivanna River, and
the board did HBX hear the Health Dept approval, as Mr. Rice
did approve this site, my surveyor and myself feel it is
worthy of another attempt to be heard by your board.
I will be happy to provide you with any and all information
regarding this case.
The subdivision is dividing one 9 acre parcel int~2 parcels.
The Tax Map 30 Parcel 15E is a very small request, and^do not
think it should take very much of your time.
Please let me know when I could be heard, and when and how
many copies of each piece of information you will need.
I appreciate your response.
Sincerely,
~~~
Sara Watson
413 EAST MAIN STREET . ~HARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22901 . (ON THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN MALL) . (804) 293-4367
Piedmont
Virginia
Community
College
,u., ell Ire cf. i ( / 1"'3/ c]
y! ///;]: /;:/
Route 6, Box 1-A, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22901-8714, Tel. 804/977-3900
The Piedmont Virginia Community College Profile
In Albemarle County
Piedmont Virginia Community College is committed to providing
quality education which is geographically, educationally, and
financially accessible and which responds wisely and quickly to
local needs and changing technology. PVCC's service to Albemarle
County reflects this philosophy.
PVCC's division of continuing education works closely with
Andy Stamp, Albemarle County's coordinator of adult and community
education, to offer classes of interest to county residents and
to avoid duplication of courses offered in other programs.
The college's continuing education division administers an
evening program at Albemarle High School with additional classes
offered at Western Albemarle High. This program provides a full
range of classes from all of PVCC's academic divisions. In 1990-
91, approximately 80 classes were offered at Albemarle High; some
900 students enroll there each semester. PVCC rents some 15
classrooms each semester at a cost of $18,000 per year.
PVCC began working with the Charlottesville-Albemarle
Technical Education Center in 1973. The college's division of
continuing education develops and administers classes and rents
the classroom space. Bernie Snyder is the CATEC/PVCC
coordinator. In 1990-91, the college offered 18 classes at
CATEC, enrolling a total of 231 students.
In 1990-91, PVCC served 6,756 individual students, 2,604 of
whom were residents of Albemarle County. This accounted for 44.2
percent of all students enrolled from the college's service area
and 3.8 percent of the county's total population.
In fall semester 1990, a total of 1,686 students from
Albemarle County took both on- and off-campus classes from
PVCC. Of these 1,686 students, 80.7 percent were part-time, 61.7
percent were female, 7.4 percent were African-American, and 72.2
percent were returning students. In comparison with the profile
of the total student body at PVCC, about the same percentage of
Albemarle students are part-time and are women. However, more
are returning students and f~we~are African-American.
In 1990-91, PVCC enroll
members of the 1990 gradl.la
about 1 percent over last
graduates of Western Ai
31.6 percent (108) of the 342
class of Albemarle High School (up
) and 28. 1 percent (54) of the 192
about 3.5 percent).
Albemarle
Charlottesville
Fluvanna
Greene
Louisa
Nelson
\...-.111
DATE / ! 1f2/<t~nCltLL 1:5, /99/
AGENDA ITEM NAME
9/, /1 C:2. fY 3
,/111- 9/- / ~
I~? (:- Ii, /97/ ) cf i~1 CL';/! de f-t ?/)( c({
"./
P/.yYr: /;vj&~ t( /-(:1 /uf1/. ct..dx. ./'
AGENDA ITEM NO.
DEFERRED UNTIL
/rjz. . J7'.
ht-?LL':.>
Form.3
7/25/86
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT
SECTION lO.4, AREA AND BULK REGULATIONS,
OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, that Chapter 10.0, Rural Areas District, RA, in
section 10.4, Area and Bulk Regulations, of the Albemarle County
zoning Ordinance, be amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Amend table under Section 10.4, Area and Bulk Regulations,
as follows:
10.4
AREA AND BULK REGULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS DIVISIONS BY RIGHT DIVISIONS BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(Amended 8-14-85)
Gross Density 0.5 du/ac 0.5 du/ac
Minimum lot size 2.0 acres 2.0 acres
Minimum frontage
existing public
roads 250 feet 250 feet
Minimum frontage
internal public
or private roads 150 feet 150 feet
Yards, minimum:
Front (existing public roads) 75 feet 75 feet
Front (internal public or
private road) 25 feet 25 feet
Side 25 feet 25 feet
Rear 35 feet 35 feet
Maximum
structure
height 35 feet 35 feet
* * * * *
I, Lettie E. Neher, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing
is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Vi~rginia, at a regular meeting held
on November 13, 1991. ~
-0// 0
Clerk, Board 6 County Supervisors
"
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte Y Humphris
,Jack Joudt
Edward H. Bain, Jr
Samuel Miller
Walter F. Perkins
Whitt' Hall
F. R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T. Way
Scottsville
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
DATE: November 18, 1991
SUBJECT: Supplement No. 63 to the Zoning Ordinance
Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the
Zoning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments
made on November 13, 1991.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
George R. St. John
Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Peyton Robertson
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Amelia Patterson
Clerk
'.
e.
10.4
o!J~
No rural preservation development shall contain less
than one (1) rural preservation tract. The commission
may authorize more than one (1) rural preservation
tract in a particular case pursuant to the various
purposes of rural preservation development as set forth
in section 10.3.3.2 or in accord with section
10.3.3.3.c, as the case may be;
f.
No rural preservation tract shall consist of less than
forty (40) acres. Except as specifically permitted by
the commission at time of establishment, not more than
one (1) dwelling unit shall be located on any rural
preservation tract or development lot. No rural
preservation tract shall be diminished in area. These
restrictions shall be guaranteed by perpetual easement
accruable to the County of Albemarle and the public
recreational facility authority of Albemarle County in
a form acceptable to the board. In accordance with
Chapter 18 of the Code of Albemarle, the director of
planning and community development shall serve as agent
for the board of supervisors to accept such easement.
Thereafter, such easement may be modified or abandoned
only by mutual agreement of the grantees to the
original agreement.
AREA AND BULK REGULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS DIVISIONS BY RIGHT DIVISIONS BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(Amended 8-14-85)
Gross Density 0.5 du/ac 0.5 du/ac
Minimum lot size 2.0 acres 2.0 acres
Minimum frontage
existing public
roads 250 feet 250 feet
Minimum frontage
internal public
or private roads 150 feet 150 feet
Yards, minimum:
Front 75 feet 75 feet
Side 25 feet 25 feet
Rear 35 feet 35 feet
Maximum
structure
height 35 feet 35 feet
-95-
(Supp. #51, 11-8-89)
.'
David P Bowerman
Chdrlollesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979.1281
Charlotte Y Humph",
.J,'lC~. ,Jouel1
Edward H Bain. Jr
Samuel Miller
Waller F PerkinS
Whll\' Holl
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Riv.'lnna
Peter T. Way
Scotlsvdl2
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CM~
DATE: November 18, 1991
SUBJECT: Supplement No. 63 to the Zoning Ordinance
Attached are new sheets to be inserted in your copy of the
Zoning Ordinance. This supplement was occasioned by amendments
made on November 13, 1991.
LEN:ec
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
George R. St. John
Richard E. Huff, II
Robert B. Brandenburger
Peyton Robertson
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Amelia Patterson
Clerk
- "
e. No rural preservation development shall contain less
than one (1) rural preservation tract. The commission
may authorize more than one (l) rural preservation
tract in a particular case pursuant to the various
purposes of rural preservation development as set forth
in section 10.3.3.2 or in accord with section
10.3.3.3.c, as the case may be;
f. No rural preservation tract shall consist of less than
forty (40) acres. Except as specifically permitted by
the commission at time of establishment, not more than
one (1) dwelling unit shall be located on any rural
preservation tract or development lot. No rural
preservation tract shall be diminished in area. These
restrictions shall be guaranteed by perpetual easement
accruable to the County of Albemarle and the public
recreational facility authority of Albemarle County in
a form acceptable to the board. In accordance with
Chapter 18 of the Code of Albemarle, the director of
planning and community development shall serve as agent
for the board of supervisors to accept such easement.
Thereafter, such easement may be modified or abandoned
only by mutual agreement of the grantees to the
original agreement.
lO.4
AREA AND BULK REGULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS DIVISIONS BY RIGHT DIVISIONS BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(Amended 8-14-85)
Gross Density 0.5 du/ac 0.5 du/ac
Minimum lot size 2.0 acres 2.0 acres
Minimum frontage
existing public
roads 250 feet 250 feet
Minimum frontage
internal public
or private roads 150 feet 150 feet
Yards, minimum:
Front (existing public roads) 75 feet 75 feet
Front (internal public or
private road) 25 feet 25 feet
(Amended 11-13-91)
Side 25 feet 25 feet
Rear 35 feet 35 feet
Maximum
structure
height 35 feet 35 feet
-95-
(Supp. #63, 11-13-91)
10.5
SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR MULTIPLE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
lO.5.1
LIMITATIONS ON DIVISIONS PERMITTED BY RIGHT
Divisions of land shall be permitted as provided herein-
above; except that no parcel of land of record on the date
of the adoption of this ordinance may be divided into an
aggregate of more than five (5) parcels except as provided
in section 10.3.2 and section 10.5.2 hereof nor shall there
be constructed on any such parcel an aggregate of more than
five (5) units. (Amended 11-8-89)
10.5.2 WHERE PERMITTED BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
10.5.2.1 The board of supervisors may authorize the issuance of a
special use permit for: (Amended 11-8-89)
a. More lots than the total number permitted under section
10.3.1 and section 10.3.2; provided that no such permit
shall be issued for property within the boundaries for
the watershed of any public drinking water supply
impoundment; and/or (Added 11-8-89)
b. More development lots than permitted under section
10.3.3.3.b. (Added 11-8-89)
The board of supervisors shall determine that such division
is compatible with the neighborhood as set forth in section
31.2.4.1 of this ordinance, with reference to the goals and
objectives of the comprehensive plan relating to rural areas
including the type of division proposed and specifically, as
to this section only, with reference to the following:
(Amended 11-8-89)
1. The size, shape, topography and existing vegetation of
the property in relation to its suitability for agricul-
tural or forestal production as evaluated by the United
States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation
Service or the Virginia Department of Forestry.
2. The actual suitability of the soil for agricultural or
forestal production as the same shall be shown on the
most recent published maps of the United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service or other
source deemed of equivalent reliability by the Soil
Conservation Service.
3. The historic commercial agricultural or forestal uses
of the property since 1950, to the extent that is
reasonably available.
4. If located in an agricultural or forestal area, the
probable effect of the proposed development on the
character of the area. For the purposes of this
section, a property shall be deemed to be in an agricul-
-95.1-
(Supp. #51, 11-8-89)
,~',stri~uted to Boatd: . to -4 -91
lerl1Ja Item No. ~. Ofll ~ 41.1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
',~
MEMORANDUM
."
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
and (ffi0
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
DATE:
October 2, 1991
RE:
Public Hearing To Consider Amendment To The
Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional
Areas To Provide Expanded Public Water And Sewer
Service In Scottsville Area
On September 11, 1991, staff provided the attached report to
the Board of Supervisors regarding the referenced subject.
In reviewing this report, the Board requested staff to go
back and research the history of consideration to growth
area boundary changes and jurisdictional area designation in
Scottsville. After review of past actions and minutes of
the Board of Supervisors, staff can provide the following
comment.
1. On November 21, 1977 the Board of Supervisors acce~ted
the following recommendation for jurisdictional area
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in Scottsville:
"expansion of the KDA proposal to incorporate the
shopping center and adjacent commercial zoning".
Documentation is not specific as to whether this
recommendation was for water service only or full
service. It should be noted that in a November 1, 1977
staff report, staff stated "the Ivy area is the only
area where staff can support a water only service area
due to existing facilities in that area and a history
of ground water problems".
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Page 2
October 2, 1991
2. On August 27, 1980 the Board of Supervisors adopted the
following motion: "To draw a thin blue line on
properties on Route 726 from the Scottsville Treatment
Plant to the border of the scottsville Growth Area
indicating properties fronting on said road are
included in the water only district". Tax Map 130A(1),
Parcel 64B is a property adjacent to Route 726.
3. In 1983, the Board of Supervisors amended the Albemarle
County Service Authority Jurisdictional Areas to conform
with recent revisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The
changes for Scottsville were: (1) provide for water to
existing structures contiguous to water line; (2)
expand service area for water and sewer to conform with
new Growth Area boundaries; and, (3) delete service to
areas outside of existing Growth Area except for
Scottsville Shopping Center and commercial uses and
uses in need of fire protection along Route 6.
Although not documented, it is the recollection of Ron
Keeler that water only designation was provided to Tax
Map 130A(1), Parcels 64, 64A, 64B, and 65 to ensure
that water would be available to the fire department if
the adjacent commercial area, especially the lumber
company, caught on fire.
4. On February 1, 1989, during the Comprehensive Plan work
session with the Board of Supervisors, John Horne
stated that there had been interest by business owners
in the area of the shopping center to participate in
the cost of extending water and sewer to the shopping
center. Mr. Lindstrom asked for staff recommendation
regarding extension of sewer service into a watershed
area. Mr. Horne replied that it had been negatively
looked upon in the past. Mr. Lindstrom later asked
staff to bring to the Board a specific proposal with
rationale for establishing any growth area in a
watersupply watershed. On March 15,l989, in continuing
review of the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommended
that the boundaries of Scottsville as proposed not be
changed. It was noted that a key factor in this
recommendation was that such expansion would be into
the Totier Creek Watershed.
In summary, staff has not been able to conclusively
determine the intention for the jurisdictional area
designation for Tax Map 130A(1), Parcel 64B, which is
currently for water only. It is obvious, however, that
there has been an intention to recognize the commercial
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Page 3
October 2, 1991
areas outside of the growth area as important to the
Scottsville Community. It also appears that a water only
designation was to serve a fire protection purpose for
properties along Route 6 and the full service designation
was particularly important to the shopping center. Lacking
prior intention to the contrary, staff would still
recommend, based on current policy, that the jurisdictional
area designation not be changed as reasoned in the September
4, 1991 report to the Board of Supervisors.
VWC/jcw
ATTACHMENT
.iu::ed to Board: .-!I-t.; - ? J
.--
I~eenc)a Item No. !l1.dF1.iL..J::U,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
a.. . .',i
..-"
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
and j(JJ6
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
Community Development
DATE:
September 4, 1991
RE:
Consideration of Amendment to ACSA Service Areas
To Provide Expanded Public Water and Sewer Service
in the scottsville Area
In August, 1991, Reverend Peter Way requested that staff
look into possible jurisdictional area changes in the
scottsville area and report to the Board of Supervisors.
Those changes would be to reflect water and sewer line
extensions to be undertaken in the scottsville area. In
discussion with Bill Brent, I understand Rev. Way was
particularly interested in the possibilities of full service
to TM 130A(1), Parcel 64B on the southwest corner of Rt.
6 and Rt. 726 across from the shopping center. This parcel
is zoned HC and currently in the jurisdictional area for
water only. Mr. Brent also indicated that several
properties north of Rt. 726 between Rt. 20 and Rt. 795, all
outside of the current jurisdictional area and zoned RA,
would be at least partially traversed by a water line to be
constructed. Ultimately, those properties may desire water
only designation.
All of the above referenced properties are located in the
Rural Areas as designated by the Comprehensive Plan and
within the Totier Creek Reservoir watershed. Regarding
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Page 2
September 4, 1991
provision of public utilities, the Comprehensive Plan is
specific in objective and strategies as to where and under
what circumstances public utilities should be made available
(p. 146):
Obiective: Provide public water and sewer services to
the Urban Area and Communities.
Strateqies:
o Follow the boundaries of the designated Growth
Areas in delineating jurisdictional areas.
o Only allow changes in jurisdictional areas outside
of designated Growth Area boundaries in cases where
the property is: (1) adjacent to existing lines;
and (2) public health or safety is endangered.
In finding the ACSA water and sewer line extensions in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Albemarle County
Planning Commission stated its finding was under the
following conditions:
I. provision of service is to properties within the
Community. (Those areas to the north and west of the
Community boundaries are in the Totier Creek watershed.
provision of general water and/or sewer service to this
area may increase the likelihood of intensified
development in the watershed which is in conflict with
the intent of the Comprehensive Plan).
2. provision of service to those properties outside the
Community only where they are within the ACSA
jurisdictional area or where there exists a public
health or safety concern.
Therefore, expanded jurisdictional area designation of the
referenced properties would be inconsistent with both the
objective and applicable strategies of the Comprehensive
Plan. There are no identified health or safety problems on
these properties that staff is aware of. TM 130A(l), Parcel
64B has been provided with public water service. This
designation was not made under the current Comprehensive
Plan objective and strategies.
RECOMMENDATION
It has been the Board's position that public utility
capacities should be reserved to support development of
designated growth areas. Allowance for expanded
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Page 3
September 4, 1991
jurisdictional area designation to the referenced
properties would be inconsistent with past actions by the
Board to limit utility service outside the designated growth
areas, particularly in a water supply watershed. Based on
the above reasons, staff does not recommend such
juriSdictional area changes be undertaken.
VWC/jcw
cc: Bill Brent
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
1M
- -
SCALE IN fEET
1M too
'r
SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT
SCOTTSVILLE INSERT
SECTION 130A(
COUNTY
ALBEMARLE COUNl
123
'-.
).
..--
.,
'\
,
24 /1
./ 'X
" /~"\---.)""
\ .~;r ,
.~ 26'
''\.
,
\
.
\
\ (~Y~:+="
~ \ ), ~ ~
t',+'=1~
\'\ 46 '~
45 ...........~ -f
. r- "
. ~.... 50 ), +.;,
~ ., + 49A
~? /
~ .
.. ~...., ./
tT8
88"'1
/'"
(
')
/
/
/
I
,,---~
137
DISTRICT
SECTION
SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT
Distributed to Board:
Agenda Item No.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
\, /', f ',~~ . ~';l.~;/:,~"\F\'i.c
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
r/-;'i :{ r' r:::.~;~) r"'~1 ~\ ~.~ l7 i"i7~:r r-~-l
I !)(~"' -~~~-~~;~'~\) II i \,
i'l \ .' I I
Albemarle County Board of supervisor~ U Lt~;l~~':'" i.~;.cr"\TY:J L~
DOt\Fm 'ER\/!SO~~S
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executlve
MEMORANDUM
November 4, 1991
Greenwood School Property
On March 22, 1990, the County entered into an agreement to sell the
Greenwood School Property to the Marthe Robin Ca:tholic School.
This agreement stipulated that in the event the buyer was unable to
close within sixty days from the execution of the agreement, the
seller could declare the contract null and void.
Our latest communication with representatives of the prospective
purchaser indicates that they have been unable to obtain the
necessary financing to close on the property, although they are
continuing to attempt to raise the funds. Recent visits to the
property indicate that it continues to be vandalized and
deteriorate from a structural standpoint.
Staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to:
(1) notify the Marthe Robin Catholic School that the
Board declares the sales contract null and void, and
(2) either advertise the property for sale or auction the
property.
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.134
.
tif'f'f!........t."i
~; f""' :~
~ ; I..
,. .'
" \ :..'........'.
~ V ~1
\.....~j
Edward H. Bain. Jr
Samu",l Miller
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte Y Humphns
,Jrlck JOUl!1I
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Waller F Perkins
Whlt~ Hall
F. R. (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
Peter T Way
SCOllsvtlle
November l5, 1991
Mr. James L. Desmond
Marthe Robin Catholic school
715 Flordon Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Desmond:
At its regular meeting on November 13, 1991, the Albemarle
County Board of Supervisors took action to declare null and void
the contract signed on March 22, 1990 to sell you the property
known as the Greenwood School.
The Board regrets that the contract was not carried out and
would advise that if at some later date your organization would be
in a position to renegotiate an offer, please feel free to contact
Mr. Richard Huff, Deputy County Executive, at 296-5841. The
County, meanwhile, will be moving to find another buyer for the
property and trusts that if you are still interested, contact would
be made as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
if/( ~
F. R. Bowie
Chairman
FRB:ec
cc: Richard Huff
CLERK, BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
REQUEST FOR AGENDA OF
7I~ /:3//7''Y/
,
Item Name
(Note: This number does
this item is deferred to some future date.
moved forward with all of t e paperwork.)
~
Agenda Item No.
not change
This sheet
..'~ ".,,' l L/ J. It~t
T)
presentor
(For County Executive's information, please note name of
person who will be making presentation to the Board.)
Request Made By ~
l
On (Date)
/tJ'"-;,"--?/
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE:
This form is to be used when scheduling an item for a Board
of Supervisors' agenda. This form will NOT be distributed
to anyone, but is intended only for use by the Clerk in
scheduling the agenda. Please fill out one copy of this
work sheet (it may be handwritten) and return with the orig-
inal of any paperwork you wish to have forwarded to the Board.
For Clerk's Use:
Appointment Confirmed with (name)
On (Date)
By (Name)
Telephone? Mail?
Materials Received with Request? (Yes)
(No)
Materials Photocopied?
Note: On appeal of site plans or subdivision plats, be sure
to include Planning Commission minutes with paperwork.
Form.2
7/7Q/Rf..
MOTION: Mr. Bain
SECOND: Mrs. Humphris
MEETING DATE: November 13, 1991
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING
WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an
affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provi-
sions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1
requires a certification by the
Supervisors that such executive
conformity with Virginia law;
of the Code of Virginia
Albemarle County Board of
meeting was conducted in
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors hereby certifies that, to the best of
each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia
law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this
certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by
the Albemarle County Board of supervisors.
VOTE :
AYES:
Messrs. Bain, Bowie, Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris,
Mr. Perkins and Mr. Way.
NAYS: None.
[For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the
requirements of the Act should be described.]
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
NONE
NONE
~6~
Clerk, CMC Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors
...
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, held on the 13th day of November,
1991, at which the following members were present and absent:
PRESENT:
Edward H. Bain, Jr.
David P. Bowerman
F. R. Bowie
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Walter F. Perkins
Peter T. Way
ABSENT:
None.
the following resolution was adopted by a majority of all members
of the Board of supervisors by a roll call vote, the ayes and
nays being recorded in the minutes of the meeting as shown below:
MEMBER
VOTE
Mr. Bain Aye
Mr. Bowerman Aye
Mr. Bowie Aye
Mrs. Humphris Aye
Mr. Perkins Aye
Mr. Way Aye
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AWARD OF $16,070,000 SCHOOL BOND,
1991 SERIES B, OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO
VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on september 18, 1991 (the
"Bond Resolution"), the Board of supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia (the "County"), provided for the issuance of $16,070,000
School Bond, 1991 Series B (the "Bond"), of the County to the
Virginia Public School Authority (the "Authority");
WHEREAS, such resolution authorized the County Executive to
award the Bond to the Authority at such interest rate or rates as
would produce a differential in each year of not more than ten-
one hundredths of one percent (10/100 of 1%) over the annual rate
to be paid by the Authority on the bonds it sold to provide funds
to purchase the Bond, provided that no interest rate or rates on
the Bond should exceed nine percent (9%) per year; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 1991, the County Executive on behalf
of the County awarded the Bond, bearing interest at the annual
rates and maturing on December 15 in years and amounts as shown
on Exhibit A hereto, to the Authority;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The action of the County Executive in awarding the Bond
to the Authority is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed and
the Bond shall bear interest at the annual rates and shall mature
on December 15 in years and amounts as shown in Exhibit A.
2. The Bond shall be in substantially the form approved by
the Bond ReSOlution, with such changes as may be necessary or
appropriate to conform them to the provisions of this resolution.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing
constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a
regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held the 13th day of
November, 1991, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to
the matters referred to in such extract.
WITNESS my signature and the seal of the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, this/~~ day of
November, 1991.
( SEAL)
~'lf~
Clerk of the Bo d of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia
-2-
EXHIBIT A
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
$16.070.000 SCHOOL BOND. 1991 SERIES B
Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate
1992 $ 840,000 7.500% 2002 $800,000 6.100%
1993 1,135,000 7.500 2003 790,000 6.200
1994 1,145,000 7.500 2004 760,000 6.225
1995 1,165,000 6.350 2005 735,000 6.350
1996 980,000 5.500 2006 715,000 6.350
1997 745,000 5.500 2007 665,000 6.350
1998 730,000 5.700 2008 660,000 6.350
1999 750,000 5.800 2009 610,000 6.350
2000 730,000 5.850 2010 555,000 6.350
2001 960,000 5.950 2011 600,000 6.350
J/- f?_O
, : c' '::' :'.', ' ':" ~..' .... . 0'
-",;,(.)*.......v ~'... .'~_.'''..l!'_._, _.,,~",~..._.;.!I
':',j,(~1j"1~ 4t~fY. r"".. 01, /iA4i, ,v /~
~~~~~,..:}f>,,-,l ~Cl?
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~~
DATE:
November 8, 1991
RE:
VPSA Bond Issue
Attached is the final Resolution for the Board of Supervisors
ratifying the award of the $16,070,000 VPSA Bonds.
The Bond Sale on November 7, 1991 resulted in an excellent
interest rate of 6.21973%. In comparison, the 1989 bond rate was
6.91% and the Spring issue rate was 6.369%. The closing date, at
which time the actual funds will be available to the County, is
scheduled for November 20, 1991.
The FY 91/92 Budget projected interest cost on this issue at
$980,606. Due to the reduced interest rate and the delay in the
Bond Sale the actual interest expense for FY 91/92 will be
$581,499, a savings of $398,561. The first principal payment of
$840,000 is scheduled for December 1992. We had previously
projected the principal at level payments of $803,500 for 20 years.
The actual payments are SUbstantially higher in the second, third,
and fourth years then begin reducing after the fifth year.
This matter requires the Board's approval at the November 13th
meeting.
MAB/bs
Attachment
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, held on the 13th day of November,
1991, at which the following members were present and absent:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
the following resolution was adopted by a majority of all members
of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the ayes and
nays being recorded in the minutes of the meeting as shown below:
MEMBER
VOTE
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AWARD OF $16,070,000 SCHOOL BOND,
1991 SERIES B, OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO
VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on September 18, 1991 (the
"Bond Resolution"), the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia (the "County"), provided for the issuance of $16,070,000
School Bond, 1991 Series B (the "Bond"), of the County to the
Virginia Public School Authority (the "Authority");
WHEREAS, such resolution authorized the County Executive to
award the Bond to the Authority at such interest rate or rates as
would produce a differential in each year of not more than ten-
one hundredths of one percent (10/100 of 1%) over the annual rate
to be paid by the Authority on the bonds it sold to provide funds
to purchase the Bond, provided that no interest rate or rates on
the Bond should exceed nine percent (9%) per year; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 1991, the County Executive on behalf
of the County ~warded the Bond, bearing interest at the annual
rates and maturing on December 15 in years and amounts as shown
on Exhibit A hereto, to the Authority;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
;
1. The action of the County Executive in awarding the Bond
to the Authority is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed and
the Bond shall bear interest at the annual rates and shall mature
on December 15 in years and amounts as shown in Exhibit A.
2. The Bond shall be in substantially the form approved by
the Bond Resolution, with such changes as may be necessary or
appropriate to conform them to the provisions of this resolution.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing
constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a
regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held the 13th day of
November, 1991, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to
the matters referred to in such extract.
WITNESS my signature and the seal of the Board of
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, this day of
November, 1991.
(SEAL)
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County, Virginia
-2-
. . ....
EXHIBIT A
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
$16.070.000 SCHOOL BOND, 1991 SERIES B
Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate
1992 $ 840,000 7.500% 2002 $800,000 6.100%
1993 1,135,000 7.500 2003 790,000 6.200
1994 1,145,000 7.500 2004 760,000 6.225
1995 1,165,000 6.350 2005 735,000 6.350
1996 980,000 5.500 2006 715,000 6.350
1997 745,000 5.500 2007 665,000 6.350
1998 730,000 5.700 2008 660,000 6.350
1999 750,000 5.800 2009 610,000 6.350
2000 730,000 5.850 2010 555,000 6.350
2001 960,000 5.950 2011 600,000 6.350
Distributed to Beard: ..lL- 8' .</ J Ji.,
Agenda Item No. gj.//13.. 77,5
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Air
-
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
November 1, 1991
United Way Child Care SCholarship Program Request
Attached is a letter from the United Way Child Care SCholarship
Program requesting your approval to transfer $10,000 of its
Albemarle appropriation from the "teen mother" program to its
regular child care scholarship program. The teen program is
currently serving only three girls with two more in the process of
applying, and at this rate does not expect to use more than 50% of
its allocated funds before the end of the fiscal year. In
contrast, the regular sCholarship program has encumbered all of its
$20,250 allocation and already has 16 working Albemarle families on
that waiting list.
Staff recommends that United Way be allowed to use unencumbered
funds from the teen mother program to provide sCholarships to other
Albemarle families. Although United Way has not been successful in
finding teen mothers to participate in this program, they have made
a genuine effort to reach out to the schools and other community
groups. They have also documented the need for additional regular
sCholarships and have worked closely with the Department of Social
Services to assist Albemarle families.
The total FY 91/92 appropriation to United Way was $40,250,
$20,250 to the regular sCholarship program and $20,000 to the teen
mother program. Should you have any questions prior to the
meeting, please do not hesitate to call me.
RWT,Jr/RWW/bat
91-108
Attachment
.
United Way
October 30, 1991
Thomas Jefferson Area
Child Care Committee
413 E. Market Street
P.D. Box 139
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(804) 972-1713
Roxanne White, Management Analyst
Albemarle County Office Bldg.
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville. VA 22901
Dear Roxanne,
Here is an update on the two child care sCholarship programs United Way
is operating with county funds.
The regular program, serving low income working parents, has served 17
children so far this fiscal year, with 10 children currently enrolled. (An
additional 23 Albemarle children have been served with United Way funds since
January of this year.) Spent and encumbered fUnds for the fiscal year is
$22,409. We expect attrition between now and next June to reduce that to the
allocation amount of $207250. The unduplicated waiting list of eligible
families is 16 (10 with Social Services, 6 with United Way). Social Services
funds are fully spent for the fiscal year, and their waiting list is expected
to increase at the rate of 10-12 children a month. United Way projects an
unduplicated additional 5-15 Albemarle children seeking assistance each month
During October this program received inquiries from 9 Albemarle families for
child care assistance
Once again this year the "Teen" program is getting off to a slow start.
Of the eight girls served last year, two graduated~ 2 returned to the program,
one is considering returning, 1 dropped out last May, one moved out of the
area, and one has had a second child and is now requesting assistance to
return to school. We have had close contact with the three high schools, and
from them and Teen Site have provided seventeen girls with applications. We
are currently serving three girls, with two others in process of applying. We
have also contacted the Region Ten Substance Abuse Prevention Counselors who
work in the high schools, and they are sharing information about the program.
Also notified are the Health Department, through the Maternal and Child Social
Worker] the coordinator of the new Teen Health Center (at OVA). and the
members of the Prevention Council. Right now I estimate that we will utilize
about 50% of the funds allocated for this program, or $10)000.
You asked for my opinions as to why more girls are not accessing this
program. I think there are a lot of different reasons, but the main one is
that child care is not the only need that these kids have in order to remain
in or return to school. For one teen mom, there may be substance abuse in the
family, or she may have been kicked out of her home by her parents. For
another transportation may still be an issue, with no family member willing or
able to care for the infant at home. For some girls3 having a baby is the
perfect reason to drop out of school, and child care will not get them to
return. Not all teen mothers come from low income householdsj and some
families have the resources to make their own child care arrangement&
I did find some information of interest to this discussion: these are
1989 figures, with very little change in 1990, according to Dyan Aretakis of
the Teen Health Center:
Albemarle births
Charlottesville births
1 to mother under 15
21 mother between 15-17
54 II II 18-19
23 mother between 15-17
53 II II 18-19
I also asked Dyan about adoptions, and she said that of 500 births to teens at
OVA each year. only one or two place the infant up for adoption. Looking at
these figures, I will guess about 40 girls total (Albemarle) in any given year
would be of high school age and eligible for child care assistance. Many of
those may be chosing to get their GED.
The request from United Way to the Board of Supervisors is to be able to
spend unencumbered IITeenll funds on day care for low income working parents in
the county. United Way is committed to serving all those eligible teens who
apply to the program during the year, up to the full $201000 allottment. But
given what we know at this point, there will be unspent fUnds which we can
allocate at this time to other families.
Thanks for your attention to this, and your willingness to represent our
proposal. I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely.
lJJ2,i-~rt0
Za ra Beasley.
P 0 ram Coordinator
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
E~ECUTIVE .OFffCE
F. R (Rick) Bowie
Rivanna
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 979-1281
Charlotte y, Humphn5
.JdCIt. ,Jouett
Edward H. Bam, Jr
Samuel Miller
David p, Bowerman
Charlottesville
Walter F. Perkins
Whilt' Hall
Peter T. Way
Scollsvdle
SUBJECT:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk, CMC~
November 15, 1991
Appropriations/Approved November 13, 1991
MEMO TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Attached is the signed appropriation forms which were approved
by the Board at the November 13, 1991 meeting.
School Fund Balance from FY 90/91 - #910027;
Pulsar Program Grant - #910025;
Year End Adjustments due to Overexpenditures - #900041,
#900042, #900043, #900044, #90045;
Funding of Stormwater Improvements for Fieldbrook Basin;
Approval of Expenditures From Insurance Proceeds - #900040;
Authorize Expenditures and Transfer Balance to CIP - #910018;
Allocation and Transfer of AHS Fire Fund - #910019
Increase of AHS Project Due to Participation of AHS Field
House Committee - #910020;
Funding of Social Services Risk Child Care Program - #910026.
LEN:bwh
Attachments (13)
cc: Roxanne White
Robert Paskel
Jo Higgins
Terry Hawkins
John Miller
Rick Huff
Al Reaser
Karen Morris
Bob Brandenburger
..
Distributed to Board: /1-9-7/-"1.
Agenda Item No. !i11J1/1.1.. '1f~
Memorandum
au f\JTV Or ,A,LBEMARl ~
;11 ri::::'1 r~:::'J r~:~:i co;', .': \".; ,,,':..:-
11'./"'''''.'''.''''''.'''' ".1
I,J. .." Ii n
i 1"\ -, I
.,..' <I' ,... ' ,\ .
\" I!i l)(\f" .,', . 'I ': ; \
II \ "\,, ~'..)~~ :' !
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL
. \ 1\
IiI \,
I-..i :,
',~' \,,',..
" ~,,:,;; ~L,')
:\ \:' ~ ,'.::. <) t~~ s
DATE: October 22, 1991
'<';
'-'. ';\ '~} :.
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker Jr., County Executive t1,.~
Robert W. Paskel, Division Superintendent ~,
Request for Reappropriation of the
FY 1990-91 School Fund Balance
TO:
RE:
At its meeting on October 14, 1991, the School Board voted
unanimously to request the Board of Supervisors to reappropriate
the ending fiscal year 1990-91 School Fund balance. As stated in
my prior communication to you, if this request is approved, the
individual schools that ended the fiscal year with a positive
balance would receive their prorated share of the ending School
Fund balance. The schools that ended the year with a 'negative
balance would not receive additional funds. The additional
monies would be used to provide instructional materials,
supplies, textbooks, and library materials.
If you require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Thank you.
RWP/TLSH
xc: Tracy L. S. Holt
Melvin Breeden
Estelle Neher
...
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910027
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF SCHOOL FUND BALANCE FROM FY 90/91.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1243161101601300 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES $189,567.00
TOTAL
$189,567.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2200051000510100 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE $189,567.00
TOTAL
$189,567.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~~
DATE
DIRECTO~ OF FINANCE
It-<il-<JI
//--/-r-7/
,
Distributed to Board:
1''':><1d3 Item No.
COUNTY Of~ r.' i:"~A:'R! E:
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
'("11 rT:::~ :,,,,..i ,~. .. ~
\ ,I
"',<<,
'.
Memorandum
DATE: October 23, 1991
TO: Robert W. Tucker Jr., County Executive
FROM: Robert W. Paskel, Division superintendent~~
RE: Request for an Appropriation Amendment to the
School Division Budget
The Office of the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
using funds from the u.s. Department of Education Drug-Free
Schools and Communities Act of 1986, is funding a $9,800.00 grant
for the program entitled "Police, Public Educators, Peer
Facilitators utilizing their leadership for Students at Risk"
(PULSAR). PULSAR is based on the successful program in Staunton
between the Staunton School Division and the Staunton Police
Department. The goal of the PULSAR program is to provide the
non-traditional Murray High School with relationship building
experiences to promote positive social bonds between school
(students and staff) and community (police, agencies, businesses,
and the University of Virginia). To achieve this goal, the
Murray High School students and staff as well as eleven Albemarle
County Police Officers and nine community agency staff members
attended an overnight field trip to Camp Blue Ridge on
October 1-3, 1991. Utilizing their experiences at Camp Blue
Ridge, family groups comprised of students, staff, police
officers, and community agency members are developing community
outreach programs.
At its meeting on October 14, 1991, the School Board
approved the addition of $9,800.00 to the 1991-92 budget for the
above mentioned PULSAR grant. The Board of Supervisors is
requested to amend the current budget to receive and disburse
these funds. Please refer to the attached line item budget.
Thank you.
Attachment
RWP/TLSH
xc: Tracy L. S. Holt
Melvin Breeden
Estelle Neher
PULSAR PROGR&~ G~~
FY 1991-92 Appropriation Request
Revenue
2-3107-33000-330207
Expenditures
1-3107-61101-160300
1-3107-61101-210000
1-3107-61311-550400
1-3107-61311-580000
PULS~_~
Stipends-Staff Dev.
FICA
Travel-Education
Miscellaneous
Total
$9,800.00
$1,184.00
91.00
6,480.00
2,045.00
$9,800.00
tt" :..:";,,j,,'_ !L::J :1.1
'''A\~)i"l.. I~,~", f.., g~.(j~]'l1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~J
November 7, 1991
DATE:
RE:
Appropriation - PULSAR Grant
Attached is the appropriation form required for the PULSAR
Grant Program requested in Dr. Paske I 's memo dated October 23,
1991.
A description of this program is provided in Dr. Paske I 's
attached memo.
MAB/bs
Attachments
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910025
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
PULSAR GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING OF PULSAR PROGRAM GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1310761101160300 STIPENDS-STAFF DEVELOPMENT $1,184.00
1310761101210000 FICA 91.00
1310761311550400 TRAVEL-EDUCATION 6,480.00
1310761311580000 MISCELLANEOUS 2,045.00
TOTAL
$9,800.00
REVENUE ' DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2310733000330207 PULSAR GRANT $9,800.00
TOTAL
$9,800.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
//-?-?I
//-/~-V
Distributed 10 Board: lL -'if -"1 ii
u.. Cf/,,/113.. 1 .
Agenda \tern nv. --~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
COLI NTY OF lU.BLi'vlf\Hlt
," i~:;:':;: ,,:;:) l"-:::; rln n r;:'-J r-r;i
1 i ~'.HJL,'e.~"'''''''') 11..1....1..)... ! I I,..
., ""\ I' I.
, , . I I:
'. NOV 7 1991 )111 ;..i
IJ \
.... I; .r
,"";''j"'\T"'T;-' \1 i
t'::'~::: LJ U L~:~i L=:J
,X:1) O~ SUF;EF(VjS:)~S
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert w. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive
FROM: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
DATE: November 6, 1991
RE: FY 90/91 Year End Adjustments
Attached are several appropriation forms requesting approval
of year end adjustments and overexpenditures.
Appropriation #900041 - capital Improvement Fund
This form lists the School projects which are completed
and have overexpenditures. Significant overages include:
1. Improvements to State Route 810 in connection
with Crozet School was originally budgeted at
$200,000 for the County with the balance to be
paid by VDOT. Final negotiations of the
contract resulted in the County paying the
total cost with VDOT reimbursing the County
for their portion. We are currently awaiting
VDOT reimbursement of $129,000.
2 . Changes to various proj ects resulting from
gymnasium improvements authorized by the Board
of Supervisors totaled $67,000.
3. Roof replacement at Red Hill Elementary
involved asbestos removal resulting in
$18,595.35 in additional cost.
4. Construction at Stone-Robinson Elementary
included a turn lane on Route 639. VDOT
required the repavement of the road adjacent
to the turn resulting in $16,888.26 of
unanticipated cost.
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Page 2
5.
The remaining
results from
exceeded the
represents .4%
$13,272,000.
overexpenditure of $53,000
various change orders which
contingency. This amount
of the total project cost of
An additional $2,500 expenditure for Crozet is currently
in the process of being approved. An appropriation will
be requested after the final amount is determined. The
CIP Fund Balance will cover these items.
Appropriation #900042 - General Fund
This form details the five cost centers which had
overexpendi tures . The large overexpendi ture in the
Sheriff's Office is due to the purchase of new vehicles
in FY 90/91 to avoid the price increase projected for FY
91/92. These expenditures can be covered from the
General Fund Balance.
Appropriation #900043 - Miscellaneous School Funds
Food Services - Expenditures exceeded appropriation by
$49,310.33 which can be funded from food sales
which also exceeded projections.
Migrant - This program is based on available Federal
funds. The final grant amount was not determined
until after the original appropriation was approved.
Revenues have been received to fund the appropriation.
CBIP - Expenditures exceeded appropriation by
$61,566.93 which can be partially funded from
program revenue in excess of projections
($33,831.15) and the transfer of $27,735.78
from the School Fund Balance. The expenditures
were incurred for field trip transportation
funded in part by the piedmont Regional Education
Programs (PREP).
E.D. Proqram - Program revenues were less than
projected and requires a transfer of $959.86
from the School Fund Balance.
Communitv Education - Expenditures exceeded
appropriation by $68,073.71 resulting
primarily from Special Education needs.
This expense can be funded as follows:
Tuition Receipts $26,910.66; Fund Balance
FY 89/90 $4,541.29; transfer from School
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Page 3
Fund $36,621.76.
Summer School - A separate fund was established
for FY 91/92 to account for summer school
activities which had previously been within
the School Fund. Since summer school actually
began in June of FY 90/91 a small amount of
expenditures were incurred - $514.41. Revenues
during June 1991 ($16,463.55) exceeded the
expenditures and will be used to cover these
expenses and the balance carried forward to
FY 91/92.
Due to the close association of the CBIP Program, ED
Program and Community Education Program with School
activities it is often hard to distinguish when an
expense should be charged to which fund. A large portion
of these expenditures probably should have been charged
directly to the School Fund which would have eliminated
the overexpendi tures, however, the net result is the same
by transferring School Funds to these programs and
requires substantially less time. In addition, County
Auditors have previously preferred that it be handled in
this manner.
School Administration and the School Board are aware of
this adjustment.
Appropriation #900044 - School Fund
This form will authorize the transfer of $65,317.40 from
the School Fund Balance to the three funds previously
discussed related to Appropriation #900043.
In addition, expenditures in the School category for
Administration, Attendance and Health exceeded
appropriation by $28,000. This also authorizes the
transfer of this amount from the Pupil Transportation
category. No additional funding is required.
Appropriation #900045 - Soil & Water Conservation Grant
This grant actually ended in FY 89/90. However, the
employee merit payment of $909.77 was not paid until July
1990. Grant funds are available to cover these
expenditures.
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Page 4
Hopefully this completes all FY 90/91 transactions. Please
contact me if you have any questions.
MAB/bs
Attachments
cc: Robert Paskel
Tracy Holt
Ed Koonce
Jack Farmer
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
90/91
NUMBER
900041
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS DUE TO OVEREXPENDITURES.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900060203800650 CROZET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $162,999.76
1900060207800902 RED HILL-ROOF/MASONRY REPAIRS 18,595.35
1900060210800650 STONE ROBINSON SCHOOL 16,888.26
1900060211800650 STONY POINT SCHOOL 15,348.94
1900060213800650 YANCEY SCHOOL 36,270.71
1900060214800650 CALE SCHOOL 34,855.01
TOTAL
$284,958.03
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100 CAPITAL FUND BALANCE $284,958.03
TOTAL
$284,958.03
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~'l~
//- ?--9/
II'-/J~V
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
90/91
NUMBER
900042
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS DUE TO OVEREXPENDITURES.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100031020800501 SHERIFF-NEW VEHICLES $22,000.00
1100035010110000 ANIMAL CONTROL-WAGES 7,000.00
1100059000563000 DISTRICT HOME 2,500.00
1100069001110000 PVCC 500.00
1100082030110000 SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION-WAGES 600.00
TOTAL
$32,600.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100 GENERAL FUND BALANCE $32,600.00
TOTAL
$32,600.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER: FINANCE
APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~'E~ //-,7-91
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS //,.-/r-~/
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
90/91
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO X
MISC SCHOOL FUNDS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS
900043
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1300063100600200 FOOD SERVICES-FOOD EXPENSE $49,310.33
1310361101380000 MIGRANT-PURCHASED SERVICES 2,465.17
1320161102112100 CBIP-TEACHERS WAGES 61,566.93
1330063300132100 COMM. EDUC.-TEACHER WAGES 38,073.71
1330063300600200 COMM. EDUC.-FOOD SUPPLIES 30,000.00
1331061120580000 SUMMER SCHOOL-MISC 514.41
TOTAL
$181,930.55
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2300016000161204
2310333000330102
2320118000189905
2320151000512001
2320218000189906
2320251000512001
2330016000161201
2330051000512001
2330051000510100
2331016000161221
FOOD SERVICES-FOOD SALES
MIGRANT-FEDERAL FUNDS
CBIP-PROGRAM FEES
CBIP-TRANSFER FROM SCHOOL FUND
E.D. PROGRAM-PROGRAM FEES
E.D. PROGRAM-TRANSFER FROM SCHOOL FUN
COMM. EDUC.-TUITION
COMM. EDUC.-FUND BALANCE
COMM. EDUC.-TRANSFER FROM SCHOOL FUND
SUMMER SCHOOL-TUITION
TOTAL
$49,310.33
2,465.17
33,831.15
27,735.78
(959.86)
959.86
26,910.66
4,541.29
36,621.76
514.41
************************************************************************
$181,930.55
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~~
DATE
//- 7-1'/
//'-//-f!!:/
/
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
90/91
NUMBER
900044
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER X
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1200093010930000 SCHOOLS-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS $65,317.40
SCHOOL-PUPIL TRANSPORTATION
SCHOOL-ADMIN.,ATTENDANCE,HEALTH
(28,000.00)
28,000.00
TOTAL
$65,317.40
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2200051000510100 SCHOOL FUND BALANCE $65,317.40
TOTAL
$65,317.40
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~~
//-7..9/
//7~"7'/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
90/91
NUMBER
900045
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
SOIL & WATER GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1122282030160900 WAGES $909.77
TOTAL
$909.77
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2122219000199900 GRANT PROCEEDS $909.77
TOTAL
$909.77
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~~
r
//~ 7-71'
//-;/.r-j?/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
~.
MEMORANDUM
).
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
October 17, 1991
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Appropriations - Albemarle High School
Attached are four appropriation forms dealing with adjustments
to the Albemarle High School Capital Improvement Project.
Explanations of these requests are as follows:
Appropriation #900040
Payments received from the insurance company resulting
from the fire at AHS total $512,226.40. In order to
track the expenditures related to this fire a separate
fund was set up. Emergency expenditures during FY 90/91
totaled $257,472.09 as detailed on the appropriation
form. Approval of these expenditures is requested.
Appropriation #910018
This request deals with the balance of the emergency
expenditures resulting from the AHS fire totaling
$17,851.25. The remaining repairs are to be done as part
of the AHS renovations and expansion. This request also
includes approval to transfer the balance of the
insurance recovery totaling $236,903.06 to the Capital
Improvement Fund.
Appropriation #910019
This request is to increase the FY 91/92 CIP
appropriation for AHS for the amount being transferred
from the Fire Fund.
Appropriation #910020
This request is to increase the FY 91/92 appropriation
for AHS to include the expanded field house. Funding for
this increase is being provided by the AHS Field House
Committee.
Please contact this office if you need additional details.
MAB/bs
cc: Jo Higgins
Al Reaser
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
90/91
NUMBER
900040
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
AHS FIRE FUND
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES FROM INSURANCE PROCEEDS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1391064600129912 WAGES-TEMPORARY REPAIRS $933.75
1391064600510410 DEBRIS REMOVAL 6,110.63
1391064600800661 BUILDING REPAIRS 94,130.13
1391064700331000 REPAIRS & MAINT. 15,304.17
1391064700510410 DEBRIS REMOVAL 269.20
1391064700600100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 122.08
1391064700800201 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 53,782.20
1391064800312300 ARCHITECTUAL SERVICES 50,000.00
1391064800540200 LEASE/RENT-BUILDINGS 5,425.00
1391064810332200 MAINT. CONTRACT-BUILDINGS 28,660.00
1391064810600700 REPAIR & MAINT. SUPPLIES 2,734.93
TOTAL
$257,472.09
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2391019000190800 INSURANCE RECOVERIES $257,472.09
TOTAL
$257,472.09
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
f1j~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
// -/>-'7/
$/T -;?' /
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910018
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
AHS FIRE FUND
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZE EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFER BALANCE TO CIP.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1391064700800201 FURNITURE & FIXTURES $17,851.25
1391093010930004
TRANSFER TO CIP
236,903.06
TOTAL
$254,754.31
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2391051000510100 FUND BALANCE $254,754.31
TOTAL
$254,754.31
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~.t~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
//-~-~
//-/r--:?/
,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 91/92 NUMBER 910019
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES
NO X
FUND CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ALOCATION AND TRANSFER OF AHS FIRE FUND.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900060301800901 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION $236,903.06
TOTAL
$236,903.06
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000512008 TRANSFER FROM AHS FIRE FUND $236,903.06
TOTAL
$236,903.06
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~~
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
.//-/>-?
//;7J-?/
,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910020
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
INCREASE OF AHS PROJECT DUE TO PARTICIPATION OF AHS FIELD HOUSE COMM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900060301800901 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION $240,000.00
TOTAL
$240,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900019000199922 AHS FIELD HOUSE COMMITTEE $240,000.00
TOTAL
$240,000.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
fZ~JPJ;
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
//-/5-3/
-
#--/J~/
,
"
tk.\i'''..l;';J lc ~ilj' / /Jf:JL
a.genda It~m N.... Cjj.; I!~ 'l19,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors . L%1.~
County Executive~1
~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
November 7, 1991
RE: Funding Repairs to the Fieldbrook Retention Basin
Background: A retention basin was designed and built in the
Fieldbrook Subdivision several years ago after being approved by
the Department of Engineering. The basin met state design
standards for a ten-year storm. This particular design has been
used on ten basins or ponds in the County. During heavy rains in
1990-91, the basin failed. This has occurred in other
jurisdictions resulting in the State no longer accepting this type
of basin design. An upgrading of the basin is necessary to meet
current design standards. The cost to replace the original design
is $2,000 and the cost for the upgraded design is $3,850.
Decision: The Homeowner's Association assumed maintenance
responsibility for this basin but their responsibility is to
maintain it only to the original design. The Homeowners are
prepared to complete these repairs at a cost of $2,000 but in all
likelihood, the basin will continue to fail. As the Homeowner's
Association is only responsible for maintaining the basin to
original design criteria, the basin will continue to fail with
recurring replacement costs being borne by the homeowners. This is
not in the best interests of the homeowners or the County nor is it
meeting the intent of our stormwater control program.
The homeowners are willing to assume maintenance responsibility
after the basin is upgraded but they do not want to bear the
additional $1,850 cost as they feel the original basin design was
inadequate. The homeowners have requested the County to fund this
additional $1,850. Although it is in the best interest of the
homeowners to avoid recurring replacement costs for the original
design, an upgraded basin is also in the best interest of the
County's stormwater control measures.
..
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
November 7, 1991
RE: Funding Repairs to the Fieldbrook Retention Basin
Page 2
The County has funding available in the Stormwater Fund for the
additional $1,850. If you approve the appropriation for the
upgrade, there is a precedence for potential future repairs to the
other nine basins of similar design.
Recommendation: Authorize the appropriation of $1,850 from the
Stormwater Fund for the upgrade to the Fieldbrook Retention basin
with the remaining $2,000 being paid by the Homeowner's
Association. The Homeowner's Association will then assume
maintenance responsibility for the upgraded basin and any future
repairs.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.193
Attachment
"
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910024
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
STORMWATER
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING OF STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS FOR FIELDBROOK BASIN.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1910041051800975 FIELDBROOK BASIN $1,850.00
TOTAL
$1,850.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2910051000510100 STORMWATER FUND BALANCE $1,850.00
TOTAL
$1,850.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~,9~
.EY~
1/- 7- 'II
//-7r~/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Distributed to Board~ / /-3 -Cf I
Agenda Item No. 9/,..///3.. 7 fL
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Telephone (804) 296-5855
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~6
November 7, 1991
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Appropriation - Child Care
Attached is the appropriation form for the Federal at Risk
Child Care Program. Details of this request are included in the
attached memo from Kathy Ralston, Deputy Director of Social
Services.
MAB/bs
cc: Kathy Ralston
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
91/92
NUMBER
910026
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL X
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO X
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING OF SOCIAL SERVICES RISK CHILD CARE PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100053013571104 CHILD CARE-BLOCK GRANT $42,093.00
1100053013571700 SSBG-PROV RECRUIT/TRAIN 6,840.00
TOTAL
$48,933.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100033000330013 FEDERAL-CHILD CARE $48,933.00
TOTAL
$48,933.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
SOCIAL SERVICES
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~&:~
//.... 7- '7/
,//75::9/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
, ,;----
-...
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Social Services
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 977-6510
HEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Huff
Deputy County Executive
FROM: Kathy Ralston, Deputy Director fL9-.tC.
Dept. of Social Services '
RE: Federal at Risk Child Care Program
DATE: October 14, 1991
Our office has received additional funds from the above
mentioned program. Upon receipt of approval of a revised Day Care
plan from this office the state will authorize funds to Albemarle
totaling $52,616. These funds require no local match and are to be
used in the following way:
80% Direct purchase of services
13% Quality Enhancement services
7% Administration
I am requesting an appropriation from the Board as we do not
have sufficient local dollars in our existing bUdget to cover these
expenditures. This is particularly true for the direct purchase of
serv~,c;::e and quality enhancement services. Funds for administration
are aiready provided for in our existing budget. The following is
a breakdown of funds needed and the services they will provide~
1 - Direct Purchase of Service - $42,093
These funds will provide direct cash payments to providers
of day care services for non ADC income eligible families
who are working or in education/training activities.
Income guidelines are based on 50% of the state median
income. Currently we are serving eight families that
would be eligible for these funds through our Fee Day
Care program (also known as At Risk Child Care).
Since we have encumbered all available funds in the Fee
program and currently have a waiting list for service it
would be very helpful to transfer these cases to 100%
reimbursed funds. Additionally, the Fee program does
~
....
Rick Huff
Page 2
october 14, ,1991
not allow the use of funds for families in training/
education. (See attached chart for comparision of
programs). These eight families are eligible for
the Fee program now because they are also working.
2 - Quality Enhancement Services - $6840
Local agencies had many choices to enhance the quality
of day care in their locality. After discussion with~
staff, our decision was to contract with the Office
for Children & Youth - Central Virginia Child Development
Association (OCY-CVCDA). The activities we chose are as
follows:
$1500 - To purchase R&R (Resource & Referral
services)
$2400 - Advanced Training for unlicensed family day
care homes and/or in home providers of child
care.
$2940 - Provision of community wide education
designed to educate the public regarding
quality child day care and to recruit
additional family day care providers.
$6840 Total
This brings the total request from the Board to $48,933.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call.
cc: Karen
mt
T.....
....
DATE 1/ - /.5- c.; I
AGENDA ITEM NO. q/'///J, 1J-5
AGENDA ITEM NAME ~ p- q'J -5i Clij.i-trf\..
DEFERRED UNTIL '161/. ~ OJ / Ci fj!
Form.3
7/25/86
AGENDA ITEM NAME
/1 l3/Dll
Cfl. / I J 3 I 1 f 1-
{ifM.4>> /).ra11;1, j)14./~-rx-,-.JJG~d
CfJJ Qh . 4- Y-"- I 9 I
/
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
DEFERRED UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86
DATE
iI O)wrJWj i /J; I Cj 0 /
,
AGENDA ITEM NO. Cf/, Ill3" '76)'
AGENDA ITEM NAME ~luJ 17; ~~ &t ~ &:tiJ/Y1l;"r-t
~lDl'l'fl; p ~ ~UAj fJ QG (I) q I
Form. 3
7/25/86
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Distributed to Board: /I-F ~1'1
Agenda Item No. q I,JOltP44(
C~U(\JTY OF I-\LBEMAi:t:Lr
rr11 i-i~~:~ G.=~) r-::J 1-' fl C-' r--", ,'-',
I' I I I' i v'-" ,'-"'~."".;~.. d t.l I..;. 1--' I ,"., I
,I Y , -"'" ~ I J ii
j Li .1{' . \ : I i I
i ;: "', NOV 7 1991 \ ! i i I
i : \ : L .I 1 ' J ~
r"., , .', '''r~''rj : I ! I
'. '."-.,,, ',":':.. L.J ,j i,._I.:.:", I L,..! J
1_; '..} :" ,i < ;'.1.... i,'..,.,' ,'~-' I , 'j....,. .
..":') i~.; j'-- t~~ rl \~.I 'S () t:i :~;.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board
of Supervisors " A r
County Executiv~~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.,
November 7, 1991
RE: 1992 Legislative Proposals
Attached for your approval is a proposed legislative package
for Albemarle County for the 1992 legislative session. Many of the
proposals have been carried over from the 1991 session, and are
also part of VACo's legislative program which you reviewed last
month. New legislative proposals added to this year's list have
been highlighted in bold.
If approved, this package will be presented to our legislators
on December 11, and will serve as a plan of action for the
legislative liaison during the 1992 legislative session. If you
have any questions prior to the meeting on the 13th, please do not
hesitate to call me.
RWT,Jr/RWW/bat
91-109
Attachment
c: Nancy O'Brien
SUMMARY 1992 LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS
MAJOR LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS
o EQUAL TAXING/BORROWING POWER. To meet the increasing demand
to provide services to a growing population, Albemarle
County urges the General Assembly to grant Counties the same
taxing and borrowing authority as cities.
o STATE LOTTERY FUNDS. Albemarle County supports legislation
requiring that net funds raised from the Virginia state
Lottery be distributed back to localities for needed capital
projects.
o
STATE MANDATES.
government from
County strongly
mandates.
with the increasing fiscal stress on local
declining federal and state aid, Albemarle
requests full funding of all state
o GROWTH MANAGEMENT. To effectively plan for and manage the
projected growth in the next decade, Albemarle County
supports enabling legislation that will allow the use
of growth management tools such as impact fees, transfer
development rights and purchase development rights.
o LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE. To provide greater flexibility
at the local level to plan for and manage growth issues and
declining state revenues, Albemarle county strongly supports
a legislative commission to study the impact of the Dillon
Rule on Virginia counties.
o SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS. with the increasing cost of state
mandates for solid waste disposal, Albemarle county supports
a separate legislative commission to review the efficacy of
the State's current solid waste regulations.
SPECIFIC LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
FINANCES
To expand revenue powers by adding:
o 1/2 percent sales tax for localities
o Regional gasoline tax
o Transient occupancy tax (Counties permitted to levy
same rate as Cities)
o Reinstatement of the state recordation tax to
localities
1
o Local meals tax option without referendum
o Local option income tax
To provide for local flexibility of real estate tax collection,
so that the long term home owners are not driven from their
primary homes due to rapid inflation, i.e. homestead exemption,
circuit breaker, refund of excessive tax based on sliding scale,
classification allowing different rates for different values of
property.
To return a portion of the state lottery funds to localities for
infrastructure needs.
To include computer equipment used for either administrative or
research purposes in the local manufacturer's Machinery & Tools
tax.
To provide enabling legislation to allow for the increase of the
roll back period for land use tax from five to ten years.
To request enabling legislation to allow ticketing of parked
vehicles for County decal violations.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING
To provide for enabling legislation which allows for the use of
growth management tools in all localities such as:
o Impact fees
o Transfer development rights (TDRs)
o Purchase development rights (PDRs)
To require recognition of local comprehensive plans by state
agencies.
To support enabling legislation for an Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance.
To oppose legislation providing vested property rights in
rezonings.
To support the state Data Center Network (which includes the
Virginia Employment Commission, the Center for Public service,
and PDCs) and appropriate funding for regional and local analysis
and growth management planning.
To promote shared land use data and Geographic Information System
(GIS) technology among state agencies, PDC's and localities.
To provide funding for regional environmental plans and
assessments.
2
To develop financial incentives to promote regional planning
efforts, including infrastructure planning, construction and
maintenance.
EDUCATION
To oppose requiring binding arbitration for teachers.
To provide funding for standards of quality.
To provide state funding for local school construction and
equipment.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
To provide funds for the upgrading of landfills to legislated
standards.
To provide funding for state and federal mandated qualities of
standards for solid waste and clean water management.
To support legislation establishing a container deposit on
bottles.
To prohibit the use of nonbiodegradable containers whenever safe,
degradable alternatives are viable.
To request the state ensure participation in solid waste
management programs by its own agencies.
To request the state to take an active role in developing markets
for recyclables.
To request that the state institute incentives to encourage
source reduction.
Institute financial incentives to work regionally on waste
management solutions.
To request local option of a single liner in rural landfills.
To provide separate property tax classification for certified
recycling equipment.
To reserve all recyclables for the localities or their designated
authorities so that the waste stream flow is sufficient to be
marketable.
To establish a separate legislative commission to review the
efficacy of solid waste regulations. Included should be
representatives of VACo, VML, and Planning District Commissions.
3
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND LAWS
To support the creation of a legislative commisssion to review
the Dillon Rule and its impact on virginia counties.
HOUSING
To support low income housing initiatives by continuing state
funding of the Housing Partnership Fund.
To allow greater local authority to require provisions for
affordable housing.
CORRECTIONS
To provide adequate state facilities for state felons in order
to relieve local jails.
To request that reimbursement for jail construction projects be
incremental rather than at the conclusion of a project and that
reimbursement for regional projects be at 50% of the
construction, enlargement or renovation costs, not "up to 50
percent".
TRANSPORTATION
To provide funding for regional transportation planning and for
local transportation needs.
To provide enabling legislation for transportation districts
which would allow for inclusion of state universities and
colleges.
To require VDOT to consider land use impacts and local
comprehensive plans before proceeding with highway projects.
To continue full state funding of the secondary road system.
REGIONAL HEALTH
To continue state funding for indigent medical care.
To ensure that the state provides adequate sanitarian staff at
the local level.
RWW
LEGPKT92.
4
~
: ~_;l.; ~{.::..~
1/-S-9
--.L"
3~ 1!!4...~;Z,
j.~~n~ ~._~_.
, ,
, l
;I? .
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOI1~,
\-: ""., ''''.'
v __:I~.t /\1 t\JJ J {)J
Memorandum
DATE:
November 7, 1991
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
Robert W. paskel~~~
Division superinf;;dent
TO:
RE:
Proposed Legislative Program
At the request of Roxanne White, I am providing the enclosed
draft for your consideration in placing before the Board of
Supervisors certain issues on which the School Board may wish to
take a position later. The school system's development schedule
of its legislative program must consider a number of the
organizations which we would like to know their positions on
before we complete our work; namely the State PTA and the
Virginia Association of School Superintendents. It is
anticipated that these two organizations will complete their work
before the end of November and will distribute their position
papers at that time.
I am sharing the enclosure to assist you in identifying
issues. This in no way represents any action on the part of the
School Board which I will be requesting at its meeting on
November 25. However, I have provided copies of this
communication to the School Board members in order for them to be
aware of this transaction.
RWP/bmc
Enclosure
cc: School Board Members
Roxanne White
~.
PROPOSED
iJ A Pt:l
d,n
f'O..p..y
l~. ", .....
1992 Legislative Program
Albemarle County School Board
In an effort to communicate its positions on issues that may
be considered by the Virginia legislature, the Albemarle County
School Board has adopted the following position statements.
The School Board of Albemarle County Public Schools:
. Opposes efforts to address the disparity of school
division funding across the state by simply
redistributing state aid among the school divisions;
. Opposes actions that diminish the authority of local
school boards and governing bodies to finance and
manage schools;
. Supports full funding by the state of its share of
actual costs of the Standards of Quality, including the
recently mandated elementary music, art, guidance and
physical education programs;
. Supports a system of waivers from Standards of Quality
if the state is unable to fully fund local costs
associated with these standards;
. Opposes the imposition of any additional mandates
without funding from the state to cover all costs
associated with those mandates;
. Supports strategies to continue and increase state
funding for school construction and renovation needs,
along with the related debt service needs, of school
divisions which include local participation
requirements based upon ability to pay;
. Opposes legislation that would require school divisions
to provide school bus transportation for students
attending non-public schools;
. Encourages the General Assembly to provide funding for
salaries which recognizes that school divisions employ
numerous and widely varying classifications of
personnel.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
ill!;lflbl!~l J tv Boa"l' j( -L-'iL....
Agi'11d.l ""'" rJ:;,,q /, /O/~ ',5:ll
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive
DATE: November 8, 1991
RE: Landfill Legislative Issues
Attached are adopted resolutions from the Mecklenburg County Board
of Supervisors addressing the new permitting fees for landfill
closure and the requirement to close older landfills under the new
regulations.
Although originally addressed to the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority,
they took no action pending further information and development of
legislative proposals. This information is included for your
discussion of legislative issues. If you support adopting similar
resolutions in addition to the other legislative initiatives, I
request you allow staff to re-draft the resolutions for your review
and approval.
RWT,Jr/RBB/dbm
91.198
Attachment
Jost @{fire Ifilox 307 · Ifil~Mon, JEIirginin 23917
c:f1lR.eduenhurg QInuntlI ~naro of ~up.er&i5nrz
arltar1.e..~, ~'Woo1.e
Cllounl\!~
~mttll"'9! ~....m"'" ~oclor
mekp~""" (804) 738-6191
(804) 738-6192
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held in and for the
County of Mecklenburg on July 8, 1991, the Board, by a unanimous vote, adopted
the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Waste Management
Regulations VR 672-20-10 requires that all Sanitary Landfill cells opened
under existing permits after December 18, 1988 to be closed under the new
regulations; and
WHEREAS, while the Department of Waste Management's concern relates to
leachate generated in these cells entering and contaminating the environment,
and groundwater in particular; and
WHEREAS, requiring the placement of a two foot cap atop these closed
cells essentially does nothing to protect the environment in that leachate
flows down and not up; and
WHEREAS, the affected cells do not have any protective lining beneath to
collect such leachate and prevent same from entering the environment; and
WHEREAS, the closure procedure is very costly, estimated to cost in or
about $75,000.00 per acre; and
WHEREAS,<all Counties, Cities and Towns who currently operate Sanitary
Landfills are subject to these regulations which offer practically no
environmental protection, but are extremely expensive; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Mecklenburg, Virginia strongly urges the General Assembly to amend the
Virginia Waste Management Regulations to permit closure under the old rules
those cells opened in landfills operating under existing permits between
December 18, 1988 and January 1, 1994; and
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLe.
,(J
EXECUTIVE OFFfCE
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other Counties, Cities and Towns be invited
to submit similar resolutions and that Delegates and Senators representing
all of the Counties, Cities and Towns be asked to co-sponsor bills iri' the 1992
session of the legislature to effect this change.
1: fl~
Mecklenburg County
Board of Supervisors
Teste:
cA/~
C. S. O'Toole
County Administrator
, ~
. ": t)f\t\t\. t\(I....
.::>- "!I. 1', '" f' '-I,'
':> -1 '~t~""fLf.) '''''.!
.'" .4'" ....., ".... '. .
. "'. ,!;I" .-u. """, v :1'"
-~~ ,;...n~ ~. u, l".t;,t.'V
\1.... J.' at~ ~ .I.. OC.\I
V~itl ~ ~ '1\~V
,.~ .. . 'vf}> ~l \ ~\)
~,<:,..~{ ~~ ~A' ~ 1 f".~t>
~~'. "'I', i'tJ'\, 1" it . "il>
~, W.lj, . tS:: !f(,~~ :l~,t:..t_~
Jf ... ~~"l. ..\ i,'Y:'./,<. ,j' 91">>
'. i( ~" ," ~. /' ,:,...
.~.<t1\\.'. . n. . ~oIl~{,J',\
""ll'l .... ~ ,"""~ l"
~.>>~. ..~ ~........ fi.~ ~.~
~....~",vfl,\ t?'l~~ ~<:~<.
",!"'~ <It "., .(~'
"'~~'JVV"" ,
~ '....;.~..,~.,
Jost @ffice ;!@ox 307 · ;!@o~Mon, ~irwmlt 23917
~.cklcnhurg QIounf~ ~oarb of ~upcr.&i.5orz
([qar1.es ~_ <ID'Woo1.e
<!lDurdJ!~
~m<rgetttlJ jiniriUill ~lrloT
l1r.lep~""" (804) 138-6191
(804) 138-6192
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors, held in and for the
County of Mecklenburg on July 8, 1991, the Board, by a unanimous vote, adopted
the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Counties, Cities and Towns became aware that the Department
of Waste Management intends to assess Permit Application Fees associated with
treatment, storage and disposal of nonhazardous solid wastes; and
WHEREAS, these Permit Application Fees will not be a one time fee but
will be recurring fees; and
WHEREAS, it was not the intent of the Department of Waste Management to
assess such fees when the new solid waste management regulations were adopted
since a change to the statute was made in the 1990 session of the Virginia
Legislature; and
WHEREAS, non-hazardous landfill design and applications must be prepared
by registered professional engineering companies to specifications determined
by the Department of Waste Management; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Waste Management justification for assessing
Permit Application Fees is to cover costs incurred in performing specific
administrative functions such as issuance of permits, permit modifications, or
certification~ to applicants; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Waste Management estimates that it will require
a total of 1385.6 or 1610.6 man-hours at a cost of $29,257.21 or $36,081.72 to
have their engineers, geologists and others review work submitted by registered
professional engineers, geologists and others employed by the Counties, Cities
and Towns; and
WHEREAS, Permit Application processing is a normal part of a regulatory
agency's business which should be funded as a normal part of their budget paid
from the general fund and not from special funds as proposed; and
WHEREAS, the imposition of Permit Application Fees exacerbate an already
heavy, unfunded, mandate thrust upon the Counties, Cities and Towns by the
Department of Waste Management to meet their new regulations; and
COUNTY OF AL8B:i:+~LE
.N f.}" ;,.,~
t.~ ! ~
1991 V'\. ~
r!~ it
/ i 1\
;~ &
'~;:.: ~.lt
EXECUTIVE OFFfCE
WHEREAS, it appears that the Department of Waste Management, by and through
the Permit Application Fee process is intent on building a bureaucratic autonomous
empire which is not dependent upon the Commonwealth for funding, but still
costs the taxpayers money; and
WHEREAS,'it appears ludicrous that the Department of Waste Management
needs to spend 1385.6 or 1610.6 man-hours reviewing the work of registered
professional engineers and geologists all of whom are insured for malpractice,
which provides alternative remedies for the Department should their work fail
to meet required specifications; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Mecklenburg, Virginia, strongly urges the General Assembly to amend the
Virginia Waste Management Act, Sec. 10.1-1402(16), Code of Virginia to exempt
the Counties, Cities and Towns from the burden of Permit Application Fees;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all other Counties, Cities and Towns be
invited to submit similar resolutions and that the Delegates and Senators
representing all of the Cities, Counties and Towns be asked to co-sponsor Bills
in the 1992 session of the legislature to effect this change.
11 {&kL
W. E. Blalock, Chairman
Mecklenburg County
Board of Supervisors
Teste:
c~~
C. S. O'Toole
County Administrator
,
, ,)1).1\;'<<\., I
~. .>~\'~'Il' filii*~;4}!~'
",. (~\\i~ ' '~'lI'.t,j
'. V ~)Vf,!f'"6r """:'u.. ,~{fjJ\1 .
\Il~sr" ~ ~ "",.(Il)V ~
\ &::\11 ~ V l\ · (JtV
"i~' t \l \.(}h '~, ~!\ I} v
qr~'~: ~) ~~"I ;;;. i HV
~i~', ~ ~')J e :: l";(l>
.t.1. r""~ .N, ,~~, l\.~ JI"Wi>
.1"" ~ 't'~ \;; '9 It ,~..).
.1\\ .' II;, b t':0"'~ 'I~I;;{,'J
h ~"""" ~ \P .,;f' ~./t
i ~~ 'I;' .,~...,....,....,/~ ~<,'-\ '
I>~ (~ ~f 'Iff" .<,<.
. l)tI'VVq(l
1',
Distributed to Board: JL - ,1-7 L,
Agenda Item No. 9IDIII3-=-7J~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
November 5, 1991 ~~
Land Use Value Taxation Report ~I
Attached is a report regarding land use value taxation as discussed
earlier this year. The report provides several options available
to you for consideration listing advantages and disadvantages of
each option. The report also provides background regarding the
County's 1975 adopted Land Use Taxation Ordinance and attempts to
define the issues as we see them.
The current land use program for preserving rural land has been an
objective of the County for almost two decades and the benefits
derived from this program are significant for the community at
large. However, if the objective of the Board is to provide the
maximum amount of revenue for the general fund, then Option A on
page 3 of the report, which provides for the elimination of all
categories of land use value taxation, will meet this objective.
Another issue concerns the elimination of use value taxation from
property owners who are primarily involved in land speculation. A
solution to this concern becomes more difficult because the land
use program is based on the current use of the land, not on the
intention of the land owner to sell or not to sell the property.
Option C, found on page 5, provides for the elimination of use
value tax in the growth areas which addresses this particular
issue.
Should the Board
significantly, as
recommend an 18
enactment.
choose to alter the current land use program
provided in Options A, Band E, staff would
to 24 month implementation period prior to
RWT,Jr/dbm
91.190
Attachment
LAND USE VALUE TAXATION REPORT
I. INTRODUCTION
Use-value taxation was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in
1975 to preserve rural farmland and open space and to promote land use
planning and orderly development. This program has recently been
criticized by citizens on three grounds:
o that it places an unfair burden on County taxpayers who are not
eligible for land use;
o that it benefits developers and speculators, as well as legitimate
farmers and foresters.
o that eligible land in the growth areas provides an incentive for
use which conflicts with the goals of the comprehensive plan;
In response to these criticisms, this report provides background
on the state's enabling legislation and the county's land use program
and presents several available options, should the Board decide to
discontinue or modify the current program.
II. BACKGROUND
In 1970, the Virginia General Assembly enacted a law providing
for special ad valorem property taxation of real estate devoted to
agricultural, horticultural, forest and open space use. House Bill 99,
as the special assessment law was called, outlined the objectives of
the land use value taxation program, which became the current
"Virginia Land Use Tax Act" (see attachment, p.8).
In 1975, after extensive citizen involvement and public hearings,
Albemarle Couny adopted land-use taxation for all four classes of land
defined in the State Code: agricultural, horticultural, forestal, and
open space. Currently, 64 counties have use-value taxation, the
majority of which include all four categories of land. Only twenty
counties exclude one or more classes of property.
State statute establishes the criteria for eligibility and the
State Land Use Advisory Committee (SLEAC) promulgates evaluation
criteria to be used by local commissioners of the revenue. The mimimum
acreage for agricultural and horticultural land is 5 acres; the
minimum for forestal land is 20 acres. In November, 1990 under local
option, the mimimum acreage for the open space designation was raised
from 5 to 20 acres.
/1 ~ 1{ltj
Currently, 325,100 acres in Albemarle County are under land-use:
108,600 in agriculture, 2,500 in horticulture, ~4,Oa in forestry and
50 in open space. This represents approximately 70% of the county's
total 474,000 acres.
Once a land use tax ordinance is adopted, any parcel that meets
the state criteria must be granted use-value taxation. The County
cannot impose additional eligibility requirements based on zoning, the
comprehensive plan or the owner's future intentions for the use of the
1
land. Eligibility is determined by the current use of the land, not
the identity or occupation of the owner.
Once a parcel qualifies for land use, the owner is not required
to reapply unless the use of the land changes. If the land changes to
a non-qualifying use, the property is then subject to roll back taxes
for the year of the change and for five years preceeding the change,
including 10% simple interest. The county's real estate division
ensures that land use properties continue to meet the SLEAC criteria
during the biennial reassessment. A SLEAC recommended range of land
values based on the earning power of that particular type of land is
used to determine the value of the county's land use property.
As part of the background of land use taxation, it is important
to understand the relationship of the Ag/Forestal District Act to the
Land Use Value Tax Act, both of which are optional local ordinances.
use. The link between them is that if you have ag/forestal districts,
then land within these districts is entitled to land use taxation
whether or not you have a land use tax ordinance, provided the land
meets the criteria for such taxation.
III. ANALYSIS OF THE CRITICISM
The critics of land use are correct in their assertion that the
land use program costs the county millions of dollars a year. However,
they are incorrect in stating that the transfer of this tax burden
abuses or violates the intent of the program enacted by the county in
1975. The land use program may be costly, but it closely follows the
intention of the comprehensive plan to utilize land use to preserve
rural land and open space. Whether one can demonstrate that land is
ultimately being preserved or protected for the long run benefit of
the community is a separate question, but it is not a question of
abuse.
Property that is ineligible for use-value taxation does bear a
greater share of taxes as a result of having a land-use program.
Assuming the current level of deferred taxes at $4.2 million and the
FY 91/92 estimate of $377,590 per penny on the real estate tax, the
additional cost to county taxpayers equates to approximately 11 cents
on the tax rate. Exacerbating this problem is the increasing disparity
between rising fair market values on rural land and decreasing SLEAC
land use values. This has caused deferred taxes to increase
significantly in the past three years. (see attachment, p. 8).
The cost of land use is not a hidden fact, since it is implicit in
the concept of land use taxation that the tax burden is shifted to
other taxpayers. It is also implicit in the land use concept that the
redistribution of the tax burden is in the public interest both to the
direct beneficiaries of land use and to the other taxpayers who derive
indirect benefits from land preservation.
Although only eligible land use properties derive a monetary
benefit from land use, it can be argued that all County residents
receive intangible benefits via their proximity to rural land, open
space, and woodlands. Not only do county residents enjoy the aesthetic
2
benefits of the land use program, but also the environmental benefits
of a protected watershed and surrounding forest land. It can also be
argued that all county properties, even in the urban area, derive
increased market value for property by virtue of the surrounding open
space and countryside.
In addressing the charge that land use benefits developers and
speculators, as well as legitimate farmers and foresters, it must be
reemphasized that use value taxation levies a tax on the current use
of the land, not on the owner. The land-use program cannot distinquish
between property owners or the income level of the owners. The
intention of the landowner to sell or not to sell is not considered.
If the land meets the criteria, ie. is farmed, planted, forested to
SLEAC standards, it is eligible for use-value taxation. To determine
eligibility among property owners based on criteria other than the
current use of the land is illegal.
From the start of the program at the state level, it has been
understood that land use benefits would apply to the developer and big
timber companies, as well as bona fide farmers, provided they meet the
eligibility criteria. It was a conscious decision by the legislature
that six years of rollback taxes was the necessary incentive to keep
land from being developed, and conversely, to recompense the county if
and when the use was changed and the land developed. Therefore, it
should not be considered a "loophole" when a property owner converts
land from land use tax status to developed status and pays six years
of roll back taxes.
Recognizing that in times of rapidly escalating land prices and
increased land speculation a 5 year rollback may not adequately
compensate the County for the benefit of a deferred tax status, the
County has petitioned the legislature for the past two years to
increase the rollback period to 10 years.
Even though the program is not being "abused" in violation of its
original intent, if the Board feels that the current policy needs to
be revised, the following options are available.
IV. OPTIONS
A. ELIMINATE ALL CATEGORIES OF USE VALUE TAXATION
The most restrictive option is to eliminate all categories of
land use value taxation, which means only eligible land that meets the
SLEAC criteria within an agricultural/forestal district would qualify
for land-use taxation. Parcels currently receiving land use would have
to join an ag/forestal district in order to continue to qualify for
land use.
Advantaqes:
o Since ag/forestal districts are permitted only in the rural areas,
land use in the growth areas would be eliminated. Assuming that
open space benefits the growth area, this can also be a
disadvantage.
3
o Immediately restricting land-use to eligible land within an
ag/forestal district would significantly reduce the acreage under
land use. with 63,476 acres currently enrolled in ag/forestal
districts and deferred taxes of $807,000, the immediate impact
would be a net increase in revenues of almost $3.4 million.
Assuming that any major change in land use policy would defer the
effective date to allow rural parcels to join an ag/forestal
district, realised revenues would be substantially lower. Most
rural properties would eventually be able to either join or
establish an ag/forestal district.
o Requires a 4 to 10 year commitment from bona fide
agricultural/forestal parcels, and ultimately gives local
government more control over the location and extent of land-use
taxation.
Disadvantages:
o Offsetting the potential revenue increase, roll back taxes will not
become payable upon eliminating use-value taxation, but only when
the land is changed to a non-qualifying use.
o Potential destabilizing and devastating impact on the bona fide
agricultural and forestal community and loss of important natural
resources.
o Administrative problem to rapidly organize and implement new
agricultural/forestal districts.
o Inconsistent with the comprehensive plan that endorses land
use.
o Rate of development may increase. Although some experts support
this view, others argue that development is linked to demand and
that the rate will not change significantly.
B. USE VALUE FOR OPEN SPACE ONLY
A second option is to eliminate use value for agricultural,
forestal and horticultural classes and allow only the open-space
designation. Based on 1988 amendments to the use-value taxation law, a
locality may authorize use-value for open space only. The property
must meet one of the following three requirements: located within an
agricultural/forestal district: subject to a recorded perpetual
easement held by a public body; subject to a recorded commitment
between the landowners and the local governing body not to change to a
nonqualifiying use for a time period of 4 to 10 years.
Advantaqes:
o Best alternative from a planning perspective, since it is
consistent with the comprehensive plan to utilize land use taxation
to preserve rural land uses.
4
o Recognizes that rural properties, not just farms, provide a benefit
to the County, such as protection of watersheds and preservation of
natural, scenic and historic resources and open space.
o First requirement achieves the same effect as eliminating use-value
except within the agricultural/forestal districts.
o Second requirement encourages property owners to grant an easement
to a public body in return for the benefit of use-value taxation
and the assurance that the property will be preserved in open-space
under private ownership.
o Involves governing body in decisions about land to be included in
ag/forestal districts or subject to a contractual agreement. Allows
more Board control over the range and extent of use-value taxation
through the contract option.
o Use-value tax would be eliminated in the growth areas, except where
the County entered into a contractual agreement to preserve
farmland or desired open space.
o Allows qualifying agricultural or forestal parcels to have land use
without joining an ag/forestal district under the contract option.
Disadvantages:
o Would require current recipients of land-use taxation to make a
commitment not to change the use of their land for specified period
of time. However, length of commitment could be based on proximity
to the path of development.
o Administrative problem to either enroll current eligible properties
into ag/forestal district or develop individual contracts for Board
approval.
c. ELIMINATE USE VALUE TAX IN THE GROWTH AREAS
The third option is to retain use-value tax in the rural areas
while eliminating it in areas designated for growth in the
comprehensive plan. This option is not available to Albemarle County
under present enabling legislation and would require that our
legislators seek either a general amendment, or one specifically
applicable to Albemarle County.
Advantaqes:
o Conforms to the goals of the comprehensive plan to encourage
development in the growth areas and retain farmland and open space
in the rural areas.
o Property in the growth areas held solely for development purposes
would no longer be eligible for land use.
o Elimination of land use in the growth area would increase revenues
by approximately $338,000.
5
Disadvantaqes:
o Existing farms, desirable open space or wooded land in the growth
areas would also be eliminated from use-value taxation.
o Roll-back taxes are not due if the County eliminates land-use in
the growth area. Rollback taxes would come due only if owner
requested a change in the use of the land and would apply only to
five years immediately preceeding the change.
D. CREATE LOCAL DISTRICTS PROGRAM
Virginia Code section 15.1-1513.1 through 1513.8 currently allows
certain counties, ie. Loudoun, Fairfax and Prince William, to create
districts of local significance similar to agricultural and forestal
districts with a minimum acreage of twenty-five acres. Through the
same type of application process, review by the Planning Commission,
and pUblic hearing and approval by the Board of Supervisors, a small
parcel of land may be considered for its own district under criteria
set out in the local ordinance. The type of criteria would include
agricultural and forestal significance, the nature of the land use in
and adjacent to that district and local development patterns and needs
based on zoning and the comprehensive plan. The criteria would also
include the scenic, historic and environmental benefits of preserving
that land.
Accepted parcels may not be developed to a more intensive use for
a period of eight years and would automatically qualify for an
agricultural or forestal assessment if the land met the assessment
criteria. Upon request, a property can be terminated from the
district, but will be responsible for rollback taxes in addition to a
penalty in the amount equal to two times the taxes determined in the
year following the withdrawal.
Advantages
o Would allow the County greater flexibility in preserving small
tracts of land that provide open space, historic and environmental
benefits in rural, as well as designated growth areas.
o If land use assessment was eliminated in the growth areas, this
legislation would allow a small area or an individual parcel to
apply for a special district and be eligible for land use taxation.
Consistent criteria would have to be developed for the application
and approval process.
o Would allow small parcels in the rural areas to be in an
agjforestal district that cannot be incorporated into one of the
larger districts.
E. ELIMINATE USE-VALUE ON FOREST LAND
This last option has been implemented by at least three other
counties, and in Albemarle County would remove more than half (66% or
214,000 acres) of the property under land use.
6
Advantaqes:
o Parcels in agricultural/forestal districts could still qualify for
land use taxation if eligible under forest classification.
o Would have large initial increase in revenues. Assuming equal
property values for all categories, 66% of deferred taxes would be
$2.7 million recovered in deferred taxes. However, assuming that
much of the forest land would eventually be incorporated into an
ag/forestal district, recovered revenues would drop significantly.
o Would not impact the true agricultural community, because use-value
taxation extends to up to 20 acres of forest or woodland on farms.
Disadvantaqes:
o Forest land provides nonmarket benefits to the community, ie.
temperature moderation, reduction in non-point source pollution,
critical slopes, natural beauty, and animal habitat.
o The comprehensive plan purposefully established the 21-acre rural
lot size in order to qualify for all types of use value taxation
including forestal.
7
ATTACHMENT
HOUSE BILL 99
" An expanding population and reduction in the quantity and quality of
real estate devoted to agricultural, horticultural, forest and open
space uses make the preservation of such real estate a matter vital to
the public interest. It is therefore in the public interest (a) to
encourage the preservation and proper use of such real estate in
order to assure a readily available source of agricultural,
horticultural and forest products and of open spaces within reach of
concentrations of population, to conserve natural resources in forms
which will prevent erosion, to protect adequate and safe water
supplies, to preserve scenic natural beauty and open spaces and to
promote proper land uses planning and the orderly development of real
estate for the accomdation of an expanding population, and (b) to
promote a balanced economy and ameliorate pressures which force the
conversion of such real estate to more intensive uses and which are
attributable in part to the assessment of such real estate at values
incompatible with its use and preservation for agricultural,
horticultural, forest and open space purposes.
It is the intent........ to provide for the classification, and permit
the assessment and taxation, of such real estate in a manner that will
promote the preservation of it ultimately for the public benefit...
LAND USE DEFERRALS/ROLLBACK TAXES
YEAR TAX DEFERRED DEFERRED ROLL BACK
RATE ASSESSMENT TAX COLLECTED
1985 .77 317,814,185 2,447,169 56,421
1986 .77 317,704,000 2,446,320 39,421
1987 .72 342,879,545 2,468,732 109,330
1988 .72 341,024,760 2,455,378 121,956
1989 .72 405,044,920 2,916,323 220,633
1990 .74 407,007,250 3,011,853 100,569
1991 .72 582,345,000 4,192,884 111,407
8
....
Act"/)/,,/ //-/?'-~ ~
Albemarle County School Division
Preliminary Analysis
Budget Year 1992
I. DIVISIONS TOTALS
1992 Projection 10,514
1991 Actual 10,188
326 students
1. ELEMENTARY
1992 Projection 5,333
1991 Actual 5 , 1 97
141 students *
2. r'1IDDLE
1992 Projection 2,442
1991 Actual 2,252
190 students
3. HIGH SCHOOL
1992 Projection 2,654 + 80 = 2,734
1991 Actual 2,670 + 69 = 2,739
- 5 students
TOTAL
141
190
-.C2)
326 students
*
This projection does not include any calculation to account for the
loss of kindergarten enrollment due to the movement of school-start
age to November 1, nor the return of students at grades K and 1 who
were effected by the December 1, 1991 minimum age requirement this year.
II.
COMPARISON OF ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS FOR 1992
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
CENTER FOR PUBLIC SERVICE,
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
DIVISION TOTALS
10,514
10,809
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES
559
Sg(;
~
III. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS: TEN YEAR PERIOD
1991 2001 CHANGE
ELEMENTARY 5,197 6,993 +1,796
MIDDLE SCHOOL 2,252 3,088 + 836
HIGH SCHOOL 2,670 3,623 + 964
69 2,739 80 3,703
IV. CAPITAL PROJECT PRIORITIES, 92-93
1. Elementary
Broadus Wood Expansion: proceeding by dividing the exp~nsion over d
two-year period may provide an acceptable alternative toward a
solution of the immediate crowding at Broadus Wood, and providing
seats for a portion of children from Hollymead elementary, which will
have impact from the Forest Lakes South project. The Oversight
Committee will need to make an actual estimate of the number of
children who may come based on the housing units approved, l~ith the
guidance of the Planning Department.
2. Middle School New Facility: proceeding by dividing the project over a
two-year period will allow the Oversight Committee to examine the
feeder patterns for the middle schools and the new enrollment
projections. As you will note when you review the Classroom Capacity
Conflicts, C3rd last page of the packet) capacity problems remain for
Burley, Henley, and Jouett, while Walton remains relatively stable
for the ten-year period.
3. School Capacity ~nalysis: The Oversight Committee will have on its
first agenda a discussion and a confirming decision to recommend the
use of $5,000 to $10,000 dollars for the 1992-93 year to conduct an
analysis of the high schools, in particular WAHS, to determine
whether additional construction on site is possible.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHG~AS NOV 8 1991 "\I! I!
Office of the School Board 1 i: ' \ '" - ,/1111
i ' ,. I : ,,,~,,,\., .''''''-- :'. ) ';'''>'''-''''i''--'?'-j~~''.'':'':''' :i; t I
401 McIntire Road L; ;" '. \,:.':: U u ;"'~, L~!J
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596_: C:;: ~y) ry-?s
MEMORANDUM
//- f-1/
,."J i:",o"1 ;r~O}", 11/3.' ' 'Z,<tI;
~..'1::./ L. . ~"T-. Q 0
..
-
.
TO:
Members, Oversight Committee for the Long Range Plan
Cliff Haury ~
November 8, 1991 ~ , &I
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Meeting of the Long-Rangers
I invite you to attend our first fall meeting at 4:45 p.m. on Thursday,
November 21, 1991 in Meeting Room 1 of the County Office Building. I am
enclosing the new package of draft enrollment history and projections
completed this week. You will immediately notice several things:
1. The September 30, 1991 enrollments are included in the package.
2. Based on the consultation between Ms. Tracy Holt and Mr. Wayne
Cilimberg from the Planning Department, the projections use:
A. Ten (10) year average survival rates for Virginia L. Murray
and Meriwether Lewis Elementary Schools.
B. Six (6) year average survival rates for Jouett and Walton
Middle Schools.
C. Six (6) year average survival rates for WARS.
As you may remember, the Planning Department reviewed these figures last
fall and recommended the use of time frames that more accurately portrayed the
individual school's enrollments in light of the information that they had
about housing developments and growth in the county.
For your information, the draft enrollment history and projections will
also go to the School Board and the Board of Supervisors as well. It is my
hope that the Oversight Committee can complete the text of the entire report
and a review of its recommendations early in December.
See you on November 21.
cc: School Board
Board of Supervisors
"We Expect Success"
..
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
FROM:
Mr. Clifford W. Haury, School Board Chairman
Tracy L.S. Holt, Acting Director of Fiscal servic~
November 7, 1991
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Enrollment Projections
On Tuesday, November 5, 1991, I met with Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
and Mr. David Benish of the Planning Department to discuss
enrollment projections. The following changes were recommended
by the Planning Department:
. Meriwether Lewis and Murray Elementary should
be based on ten (10) year averages rather
than six (6) year.
. Jouett and Walton should be based on six (6)
year averages rather than three (3) year.
. Western Albemarle should be based on six (6)
year averages rather than three (3) year.
We also discussed the changes in the Albemarle and Western
Albemarle enrollment projections this year versus last fiscal
year. After further research, the reason for the large variance
is due to an incorrect split of the Walton population in last
year's projections. Last year's projections were based on the
assump~ion that 78% of Walton's population would go to Western
Albemarle. The correct percentage is approximately 47%. Last
year, Western Albemarle's projection was overstated while
Albemarle's was understated. I have revised the enrollment
history for the two high schools to reflect the correct split of
the Walton population. I feel this year's projections more
accurately reflect future enrollments for the two high schools.
If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to
contact me.
TLSH/smm
xc: School Board
Robert W. Paske I
Board of Supervisors
Wayne Cilimberg
.
;;; ~ >
~ 0 r
e ~~ d C/) ~~~~ ~ d C/) ~~C/)C/)C/):O",~~G)n~toto OJ
~ m
:0 C/)to );! ~ I'T1 );! ~ ~8~~8~~~~m2h;~~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ." ~1'T1r-r- C/) ." >
r- n O::j1'T11'T1 n r- n I'T1g-C:l'T1a~~::E~:o~ ~8
~ :0
-c: ~:o:t> ~ ~ 0 d~ -c:-c: ~ ~ ~-C::o"'tJ:O r-:t>1'T1 C/) r
O~~ C/) 0 ~ ~ ~ o gOoS r-:i!~ <::C/) m
~ I'T1 );! ~ );! ~ -tor-. -::E
~ > > <:_r- ~1'T10 r- ()
r I'T1 ~ r C/) ~ ~ r ::>\-;~1'T1 c:~ hig 0
I'T1 );! ~ o 551'T1 0 C
0
:0 ~ :t>~ Z
-c: -c:Cil ~
Iw en
()
.<0 II il ~I ::I:
.e.>I~ ~ I\) .... 0
Slll 1\)1\)<0 ~ .~$ m ~ ~ g]cn ~ co f$ to ~ ~~~15~~~ 0
II ~<O~ .... \~
I\) II 0 1\)10> 0> .... "'" to') 0 to CD .... (..) 10 CD ,J:. CD '-I -. Ul e.>UlO 0>....0> r
en
<0 II ~l~ 0; .~I I\) il e.>
. II ~;~ m tj ~ ~ Iu; ~ Q) ~ ~ c:; ,~
~ II ~ ....UlUle.>e.>e.>1\) '<D
II CD 1-- ...... ~ Ul f\)N.....-Ol~(.) I....
.... II 0 <DI.... I\) e.> en!...... f\) ~ (..,) e.> to) 101 to to ..... (..) W to.....t..)"'tnCDU1 <D
.<D II (0)'..... ..... .~I I\) il e.>
Ul II ~i:: ~ ~ ~;~ ~ ~ ~ .c.ol...... J\) (,.).......... J>,.UlUle.>e.>e.>1\) <D
.... II .... .....:(11 ...... to -..,J CD N e.>1\) 0 O....e.>e.> 0>
Ul II 0 <DI<D 0 ~ o 10 Ul <0 0> I\) e.> '<D 0 Ul 0 e.> W .....(J1CCU'lCDC>>O 0
~ II .r',,)1..... ..... ~I I\) il W w
~ II to iN 0) ~ N!()IO'l......(..,) .......1..... f\) (.)........... W'::'U1(,,)(,.)Wf\)
.... II Ni~ CC ~ (O!f\) ...... (,) 01 <0 .....!-...J .::. to ..... (X) f\) cc to(,.) 0(..,)-0 '~
~ II 0 <DIe.> 0> I\) I\) IW WO>O> Ul t.)iNOe,o (,.)()1..... <DUl<D<De.>OO>
m
Z
.<0 II "'1_ ..... .il I\) il W ~ ::0
011 bo II\) 0> ~ N IUl 0> .... W ~ .......1..... J\) -- (.) ...... ..... WU1U'l(.)WNN <D 0
....11 ()1:0 A. ~ ~!~ w ~ ~ 0 .:=........U'I.....,::.,Q)..... (Ot.,)..........(..,)C')N 0> r
I\) II 0 J>,.10> 0> ~ Ul 01,- .;.. U1 0 (..) ~ .....AOlNOON I\) r
~
'> m
z
0)11 1'\)...... .- .~I I\) il e.> 0 -;
boll IW c- en
-....I~ 0> ~ ~IRl Ul 8: ~ .......1.....N .....(,.).......... J>,.UlUlWWI\)I\) C
W II ....~O> 0 ~l':"~""'''''' ~ g 18 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OON-Ot.)U'I B en >
e.> II 0 O)~"" Ul WO>Ol(.,).....NA -; 0
m c-
o 0 C
'" en
:Z 0> II ~I ~I e.> m -;
0 !"r ~ ~ z
< -....11 ~ IE; ~ ~ ~ ~!e; ~ cD f5 0) :: m
~ ....~O> ;:;; t:itfj;~~~~ l!6 ::0 0
~ II I\)~~ <0
....11 0 :a..iJ:lo. 0 J>,. e.> 10> <0 0> 0> <D .... I.... 0> 0 .... .... 0> ......""'AOA.......... J>,. 0 'T1
r 0
r
~ ::0
.0) II .."",..... -4 ~I ~I W !m ::0
~ I~ m
....11 ~Ig El ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ A Co 1..... f\) f\) A. ....... ..... AAA(..)t.)NN ,<D
0> II <D :g i::i ~ g \J: ;j Q A A 0>..... U'IWc.o 181 0
J>,. II 0 0>100> I\) \0 0 O').....f\) 0> I\)UlJ>,.OI\)O>O) ,en en
-;
::0
.<D II N:_ .... il .~I J>,. 0
~ -;
011 'C:c\..... ...... bJ I':" A U'I A ~ ~ 1.... t\) N A -. ..... J>,.J>,.J>,.e.>c.>I\)e.> <D Z
<D II -iO 0 <D crJ't\.> to ()1 0 0> ""","'-Jc.oOt.:ltOc,.) lXlc.oC')~t.:IU1-. '0>
0> II 0 NjU\ '" W <D 10> <D .... .... <D 0'1)00 J\J ~ N -. to CDN'::"-.CO-""::" 10> G>
I
I
.(D n !.3:-. -. il .~I J>,. Iw
I\) II 0')\00') bo IJ>,. Ul 01 J>,. :c:.. 1-. to) N A .... -. UlJ>,.UlWWI\)W
....11 cn:<.n -. <D to 10 ..... C')- ~ (.oJ i'-l ..... N "'-J en U1 .::.c.o.....t.)(X)OlQ) 10>
Ul II 0 cni..... U1 W NI..... 0 m U1 W 10> 0> e.> Ul .... J>,. m.....oo.....NO')CD ....
.to 11 t\)1-. ..... ~I il J>,.
Ul II 1n;0 U1 <.0 I.::.. 0'1 UI A "'0) 1- to) N A ...... -. O>U1U1to)AN,Ilo, <D
c.> II .... (JI't.) N ~ tili;:;;!fi ~ ~ lB ~!~ \J: !:i ~ ~ ~ I\)~UlJ>,.O""O Sl
.... II Ul CDl..... ...., I\),Ilo,CD~U1~U1
<D II I\) ~ ~I I\) ~I J>,. ~
-....11 ....[<D J>,. ~ bit; ~ el t; ~ ~ I," 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ O>UlO>WJ>,.I\)e.> <D
lBlI ::i 0 8 FJElg~~~lB 0>
II ~,~ 8 I\) ~I(..) ..... to I<D 0> .... 0> '<0
~ n I\) ~ ~I I\) ~I 01
911
~ II U, H.o 0'1 0 ~lt;;~m~ I\) ........1.......(..)t\).::.,........... gj~El~~:g~ ~
.... II 0) ~t~ ~ 0 ~ 1:2 ~ 8l ~ Ul ~
J>,. II 0 <D A I (X) (..)1\)...... 0> 0') O')NA,I:lo.CDCD
~ II !"1..... ..... ~I I\) ~I Ul
011
...... II 0>100> ......IA. (JI 0) A. 'O~....... (..) f\) A ...... ...... N A en (JI Co) A N A <0 f:':;;
Slll $ ~IA ~ 0 8i ilS lS ~ ~ I\) ~Itil ~ gj l5l Sl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul ~ A '<D c-.)
II 0> Ul I~
c::) :~
-c::J :1.,....
-< -.-.
-...
~
..
~ ~ PJ >
~ ,
;:: ~~ :t C tIl ~5iii~ 0 C tIl :<:~tIltlltll::o<;:;:::tC)(,,)(,,)lJJlJJ)' lD
r- ~ m
c: tIl PJ I'l1 PJ ~0~~8~~SJBFl\~~~~~
~ tIllJJ (") ~ r-~fi:F!1 ~ ~
-i1'l1 .,. "l1 ~ "l1 ~ >
-;SJ~ 0 r- (") C""'i1'l11'l1 r- (") 1'l1@-<I'l1~~~~~SJ~ ~o~
a ::0 :0
-< Q ;:: 0 b~""'i-<-< PJ ~ b-<::O~::O<;:r-)i-;1'l1 ""'i tIl5;:i: -< ,
0~F!1 t3 ~ Q ~ -; 0 0;0: r-:J::l> <;: c: m
~ n, tIl 0 ~ ~ ~ > O~\!!r- 'I'TjO ;:::~::o tIl
(") (')
, r- ~ , tIl ~ ~ ' :>i;""'i:i!:1'l1 e::O hi""'i a
n, 0
~ ~ tIl r- 0
~ ~ ~~ 0 0 C
r- Z
::0 -<Vi tIl ~
-<
en
-l"O (')
O::!J I
"00 0
::!J'- ~ n ~I N ~I Y' 0
O~ p, 1'>;~~ (.)'U"I 0) ...... A co ,
<-l '" n 0'):0 C') ~ Nl..... f\) N 0"1 -. ..... f\) A U1 U'1 to) (.\) N A A en
~ " co ",J>.- ~ N!NA -.::.. N -1'-1 ..... CD 0 <0 to V'1 c.n cn t\) N Q) U1 - Q) ""
06 J>. " 0 J>.J>.O NI J>. (: I...... ..... Q) CD J>. A;O) c.n - ... t.) 0> C') ...... to 0 U'l cn ...... U1 (J'l N
mz
"OJ:
::l>
8~ ~ " N,...& ...... ~I N il '"
Jlm PII
>m co " 'Co!- ...... ~lc.n en...... A (.)1...... f\,) N U1 ...... .... N A en U1 (,,) W I\) (,) A co
~z ~ r, 8 u)..... ...... ~;~ ?3 ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ :g ~ ~ !;l 'co
~::!J N.cncn "", co ""
zm
C)O
_c
z(") ~ . ~I ~I
>m .~ U ..N:......... .N '" CO
.,,0 "" " co:- ...... m!U'1 ...... CC A tn!c; ~ ~ ~ cD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,-; o , co o;.z:. C'> I\) 0;0') t.) .... to ~I "" 'co
mO "" , 0 o~O 0 co A:J:a.I\)CJ:)O '" O')i(..,) ......(0 CI:l (Q ...... (",) 0 Nt",)...... 0> .... ......, 0) J>. m
~::!J Z
Clm :0
,." 0
m,
~m ,
~ . ~I I\) ~I '" ,
>(") .~ . ~:............ CO ~
Z-l "" 011\) co mltn...... 0) c.n ~ (,0,1...... f\) to) U'l N f\) f\) A CD U1 t.) A N A (J'I I"
zQ o . 8 A:...... N '" ~:~ cn3 ~ ~I cDi~ t) ~ N a 8 m ~ = lB ~ :!;j ~ ~ ~ co m
co . Ojl\) CD I\) I\) '" :0 Z
m< 0
::!J- <ri
.en t-
6 m
z (') >
~ ~ . il il -i 0
1'> . ~,-- I\) '" m t-
o ~ . Nlt.::l CD G '".....I1U1 ...... ...... U"I ~I;,O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ t; ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ 0 c
m "" . co A-O A 8IfB~8~ '" en
"" " 0 t,O!...... Q N 0 c.cic.n 0 CD 0 f\) .... 0> Q) CD c.n ......, to) U'I N CD '" m
g m -i
." ,Z m
~ ." r:o 0
0 I~ ~
i:! ~
~ . (..)~...... N ~I I\) ~I '" I'
-l .1\) . co :0
0 J>. n 'A:t.) 0 ~l~::!~~ 0'.... N (.r,) U'l N p\) N 0"1 0) en t.) A (..) .,J:.. U"I ,~
J>. . co 010"1 A I\) '" CDIU) U"I A CD I\) N to I\) U1 N ...., CD to:) ~ U1 co I~ :0
::!J '" . 0 .....leD f\) '" CD....,CC...,c.n I\) alto:) f\) = (Q CD N .::.. N ..... N '-o! f\) ....., tI) CD '" m
m <ri 0
-l
C en
::!J -i
z - . :D
(J'l 1'> . .Wi.....f\) 1'>1 I\) il '" I~ 0
-l co n fB~~ ",I HlI~ ~ ~ ~ ~!~ III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'co
C ~ , co ~I N c; co ::!
0 '" . 0 .....:w CI:l '" U'II'-o! CD CD N (".);00 eD....., c.nco.,J:a. to w w....., CD....,....., 0') '"
m Z
z G)
-l
(J'l CD
-; ~. ~I CD
0 ."" , $JJl.- N ~I I\) '" I~
::;! -u C'>!J:lo. .- ~!~ m ~ ~ ~ll\) to.,) W en NNW c.n ...., en (..) tTI ~ J:lo. U1 .co
~ u co f\).r'\,) to I\) '" """"0 -...l -...l 0 .:. w - c.n 0 en CD - (J"l m eD 'co
Ri '" . 0 W:U1 = co tOJ'- .- CD co co Q:)l(,1'1 0 0 ,::.. ..... ......, ~ en ..... f\) ......, A c.n ..... .- co
Ji
J:
0
~ ~ II il ~I
m ~II .W,.- f\) N '" I\)
en J>. , (J"l!t.) ..... Co 1(,11 ...., to en CD!I\) f\) tI) m f\) N (,0) U1 ...., m ,::.. tTI to) ,::.. en 10
() J>. II 8 ~.~ ~ ~ ~:~ 5; 8 ~ ~ !::!llc OJ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ (j ~ 8 ~ ~ f3 (j ~ 8
J: J>. .
0
0
,
(J'l
> ~ . .U1_N il N ~I en
z p, I~
0 .... , O')IA f\) ~ ~!~ ~ ~ ~ co ~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t5 ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" " '" N;N 0 ~I
J>. . 0 ~ll\) .- J>. A len m ...... U1 N .-It.) w CD co Q) N 0 Q) N U1 to) co to U1 ......
) .
.~.._,c;....;f
""......"
l';~ '""
~
--a
-<
~
:r.:--
--'4
--I
-<:Ecncnen::OS:S:J:C>OOc:lc:l> ~ ~~
,. >8ddomcmo::o::o>::o::oc> 0
Z Oo::o::ormorOOz ~ J:::O
OOZz~J:$!:iE!:(mNm::E>O > 8~
m -<m~- ::om zO::O r
-<c:l(3:Denr-<ms: ~ enC' ~ r-<
::0 <r ~m <enJ: ::0 -<m
8- r= ~J:> -::EC ~ ~5;
z r mo r::o J:
^~ m~::o M;o~ en ::0
0
. 0
:
mm "-1-
en en ~~
~~
~~ ~! Ul <O~
>> NI\).....:.N(..)-.(.)cnt.nN(..)~(.)c.n ""
~~ "", 1\)\O-.f.O(J'IQ)CD-CDc.o~N-.OlO1 ""
mm
00 "-1-
oc:l <0<0
1ii55 0>"-1
~~ Ul, Ul 0"':
::oJ: Ul , NN-.O')I\)(..).....I\)O'>U'lW~J:a,.NOI Ul
050 Ull Q)W.:.N....,I:Io.......WU1CDUI......,OlAN Ul
C~
::j> co-
O 0<0
-"-I
Z COUl
0 Ul, Ul - .
01' N.......... A (,0) WN C,.)0l O'J(..)'::" (.,)(,,)0'1 01
" OIl ............A.CDOC:OOcn......O>f.OJ:a,.C'OO..... 01
c:l
55 co-
~ -<0
J: -"-I
en COOl
~l 01 '" .
(,,)N.....A(..)(,,).....(..)......CDA(..)A(..)UI
""I O"'<OUlO"-l<O""Co>-co co ""CO 01 ""
OJ
co_ :D
"'<0
~~ ~
Ul, Ul I
Sli "'N..... (..)b......f\)WOl.......::.. A(..)(..,)OI &l 0
(:)NC'OfD.....(..)...........O'JO)WU1.....(,.)J:a,.
(j)
co_ ~
~'" :D
co "-I
01, 01 ""co 65)>
8:! ~k5~~~~~;t)~~t6tg~t~ 8: cr
~OJ
-m
co _ O~
~<O
~;;3 z)>
01, 01 )>:D
Sll ~~tO~8;~~rtu:i~g:~~~S Sl zr
)>m
co_ rO
~'" -<0
"-I, - ~ ~~ ~C
0 0' co~~~mu;~~~~8;~~8;~ u>z
'" "'I '" -~
z )>-<
0 ~i:l
< co_
~ I!! <0
COCO CC
"-I, - "-I "-1- (j)OJ
~! =tD~::t~~~~8w!!l8:~:.::8l Sl ~r
m-
co_ 00
~<O .,,(j)
':::t1 - ::t ~~ 00
:DI
01 G5~~mtiO~t8~~8G55l~ 0 0
:DO
co- mr
ll?lll O(j)
COt.> u>
~l - ~ <0 :
~.n~~mgn~G5~~:::j~~t~Ul -i
OIl "" :D
co- O
~lll :j
co, - co ~: z
Co> . &1G5~::tlB~G5~lSiO~8l~~Ol Co> G)
-I Co>
to
",- to
~lll ......
~u: -
"', - '"
o. !:H:l15 Ol ~ ~ fd ~ l8 G5 ~::t ~ ~ ~ 0
"'I '"
",-
-'"
_ co
co, co lS~
(:j: ~15S;:;;!~~::~~~!!l&l~~~ 01
<0
<0-
~lll
co. - co 81
"-I' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
COI
",-
ji.y.u~~ l<:?lll
,-",u~ '....~:J "', ~rd~c;~~~~~g::t;jg~~ '" ~~
;(, < ~ .'
r....~ =0 0;1 01
~.;:,;,.-~..
......,";." :r~ ",-
~lll
\,;., ~':l ~~
-< "', -- '"
--J ~! ~~fd~m~~8g5l:;;!0l~~~ 8l
",-
- ~l8
~I rt&1~~;:j~~~~~c;j~8:lB8 0 ~'1
<.>1 <.>
". ~> CD ~c..:rCD E1
mr- :c >Omc :lJ .
(flCD -4 r-CZ:lJ -4
-4m :r -4mr-r- :r
ml: (fl 0-4mm (fl
:lJ> Z-4<<
Z:lJ CD CD
r- < <
m :r l:
15 a
:r 0
: . ~ r-
mm m
(fl(fl :r ~- (fl
-4-4 8 ~~ 0
i:~ :r
UI -Co> r- UlI --- ... "'~ 8
>> A ~~ AI (.)A(.,)I\)
-4-4 A A, UlOOI\)'"
mm r-
oO
OCD ~-
tii~ selO
OO~
::J:r UI I\) Co> UI 0":
UI OA UI U'lt.)~(..)
aio UI ~OO UI NOlU'lN
c>
::!~ 00-
0 010
Z -~
OOUl
0 UI I\) Co> UI ---- - .
Cll -A Cll U'lAA_
"T'I Cll 0000 Cll A IOUI 00
CD
:c 00-
-4
"T" -'"
en -~
OOCll
~ I\) Co> Cll: .... --- I\).
1\)00 :;:1 tn.....,Utt.)
A UI'" ot.ncc-
[D
00_ :0
1\)10
~:::J -l
UI -Co> UI ---- I
l'd "'~ l'd (.,)O')AN 0
Co>Cll CD-AOl
U5
00_ -l
1::10 :0
oo~
Cll I\) A Cll ---- AOO [D)>
8l _A 8l UI"'CllUl
0000 OCo>~Cll cr
-lOJ
-m
00_ 05;:
~'"
Cll I\) A ---- Bli3 z)>
Cll' )>:0
8l I\) Co> 811 UI(O.....,.::a.
1010 Co> 00 Co> A zr
)>m
00_ r(')
~'" -<0
~i I\) A ~, -1\)-- 8:8 S:!?c
0 ~:::J 21 :::Jg81~ Cf)z
'" 1\), --l
Z
0 )>-<
< 00_ ~-o
..0 ~'"
0000 cc
~. I\) A ~I -N-- ~- Cf)[D
Cll' ~18 Cll' :g-"'Cll
"'I "': I\)~I\) -lr
m-
oo_ 00
~'" "Cf)
::, I\) A ~. -1'\)-- !S~ 00
Co>~ _I ~O~Cll :oI
-I 00 Co> -I U'I,I1J..-- 0
:00
00- mr
(!?~ 0Cf)
00'" en
00 I\)UI 00 -Nt\)- '" :
~A :g~88 -l
Cll AI\) Cll :0
00- 0
112~ :j
00 I\)Ul 00' NN"'..... 8: z
Co> ~ Ul Co>: o~aQ) G)
I\) "'Co> 1\)1 NC,O"""A.
lD
",- lD
e~ -"
~u: ---
'" Co>Ul :8 f\)Nt\)1\)
0 ~:g -UlNO
I\) I\) 00 "'Ul 0
"
"
",-
_'"
_00
00 I\)Ul 00' "'Nt\)- lS~
~ lSal ~: -(it-tO
0: o.....'-Jr\J
",-
~~
~: I\)Ul 00' "'Nt\)- 8~
:g~ ~I ::~~~
001 00.
~ ~.t:t...;... . 10-
C"':) ~ji";'it.,\It~ ~~
=~~ '" Co>Cll "'I 1\)1\)1\)1\) ~~
t:--;::., ~ gg ~! ~elrg8
-rs::o ~ ",-
~~
,;J -rTi ~~
~ ~ i\l~ ~ NNNN
~ A- ~:::J~:;;:
",-
- - ~'"
0 Co>Cll 0 NNNI\) :g~
A~ ~lS~~
A -'" A
AGNOR-HURT
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 24 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 4
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 10 SELF CONTAINED 6
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 34 REDUCTIONS 10
LESS REDUCTIONS -10
RATED CAPACITY 600 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 540
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 660
-t
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ESTIMATED ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 56 70 66 65 83 67 83 434
1979 52 67 68 52 67 69 75 398
1980 51 61 71 63 56 61 82 394
1981 56 67 67 54 60 49 70 367
1982 54 77 73 55 58 54 59 376
1983 66 70 76 58 52 56 58 370
1984 60 71 68 64 60 48 64 375
1985 64 71 69 54 68 58 52 372
1986 65 77 71 62 54 63 57 384
1987 64 78 84 58 72 50 71 413
1988 75 88 89 66 67 64 58 432
1989 76 99 91 80 73 66 70 479
1990 83 112 99 81 79 68 73 512
1991 80 78 95 89 66 60 65 453
3 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.209 0.9608 0.896 0.9695 0.892 1.0519
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 80 97 75 85 86 59 63 465
1993 84 102 93 67 82 77 62 483
1994 88 106 98 83 65 73 81 506
1995 93 112 102 88 80 58 77 517
1996 93 112 108 91 85 71 61 528
1997 * 95 115 108 97 88 76 75 559
1998 * 97 117 110 97 94 78 80 576
1999 * 99 120 112 99 94 84 82 591
2000 . 101 122 115 100 96 84 88 605
2001 . 104 126 117 103 97 86 88 617.
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS-Nnv-R1
BROADUS WOOD
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 15 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 1 SELF CONTAINED 0
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 16 REDUCTIONS 2
LESS REDUCTIONS -2
RATED CAPACITY 350 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 315
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 385
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 36 38 37 33 61 44 53 266
1979 24 25 37 32 42 51 48 235
1980 30 32 29 37 42 40 50 230
1981 38 38 31 32 36 36 35 208
1982 33 31 45 31 34 38 43 222
1983 44 49 40 47 38 34 46 254
1984 41 62 47 54 46 34 38 281
1985 46 58 56 45 58 44 37 298
1986 34 60 55 53 52 58 36 314
1987 38 76 74 59 59 56 64 388
1988 47 70 87 63 60 64 61 405
1989 48 70 61 84 63 54 67 399
1990 52 67 74 63 91 65 58 418
1991 51 58 69 75 61 85 66 414
3 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.2947 0.9861 1.0039 1.0172 0.9553 1 .0454
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 51 66 57 69 76 58 89 415
1993 53 69 65 57 70 73 61 395
1994 56 73 68 65 58 67 76 407
1995 59 76 72 68 66 55 70 407
1996 59 76 75 72 69 63 57 412
1997 * 60 78 75 75 73 66 66 433
1998 . 62 80 77 75 76 70 69 447
1999 * 64 83 79 77 76 73 73 461
2000 * 66 85 82 79 78 73 76 473
2001 * 68 88 84 82 80 75 76 4851
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
O!,;-Nnv-!=l1
.
BROWNSVILLE
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 17 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 1 SELF CONTAINED 3
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 18 REDUCTIONS 5
LESS REDUCTIONS -5
RATED CAPACITY 325 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 293
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 358
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 42 45 62 65 64 50 59 345
1979 47 50 48 59 71 65 55 348
1980 40 43 50 47 62 71 63 336
1981 45 46 45 47 45 65 62 310
1982 31 35 51 38 34 43 59 260
1983 37 52 33 39 36 29 43 232
1984 44 48 46 29 37 31 40 231
1985 33 54 45 37 33 37 32 238
1986 47 62 36 40 44 34 35 251
1987 29 47 60 36 43 46 34 266
1988 44 44 53 60 33 39 44 273
1989 45 41 43 52 64 35 43 278
1990 49 48 53 45 54 57 41 298
1991 47 41 41 42 40 43 50 257
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.1171 0.981 0.9515 1.0291 0.955 1,0089
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 48 54 40 39 43 38 43 257
1993 50 56 53 38 40 41 38 266
1994 52 58 55 50 39 38 41 281
1995 55 61 57 52 51 37 38 296
1996 55 61 60 54 54 49 37 315
1997" 56 63 60 57 56 52 49 337
1998 .. 57 64 62 57 59 53 52 347
1999. 58 65 63 59 59 56 53 355
2000" 59 66 64 60 61 56 56 363
2001 .. 60 67 65 61 62 58 56 369 ,
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS.Ncw-!H
OS-Nov-!=!1
CROZET
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 17 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 2 SELF CONTAINED 1
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 19 REDUCTIONS 3
LESS REDUCTIONS -3
RATED CAPACITY 400 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 360
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 440
,
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 40 42 42 63 50 60 43 300
1979 46 49 53 43 54 54 59 312
1980 51 54 62 47 40 47 55 305
1981 61 63 58 51 49 39 49 309
1982 43 53 67 54 46 49 43 312
1983 49 60 51 54 58 40 50 313
1984 50 68 71 43 50 49 29 310
1985 46 62 46 60 47 54 41 310
1986 67 66 54 54 61 47 49 331
1987 61 66 60 55 44 55 51 331
1988 63 64 66 49 58 46 60 343
1989 64 57 47 61 49 53 46 313
1990 70 59 50 44 55 48 48 304
1991 67 53 59 52 43 61 52 320
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
0.9346 0.8986 0.9849 0.9608 0.9916 1.0121
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 68 64 48 58 50 43 62 325
1993 71 66 58 47 56 50 44 321
1994 74 69 59 57 45 56 51 337
1995 78 73 62 58 55 45 57 350
1996 78 73 66 61 56 55 46 357
1997* 80 75 66 65 59 56 56 377
1998 · 82 77 67 65 62 59 57 387
1999 · 84 79 69 66 62 61 60 397
2000 · 86 80 71 68 63 61 62 405
2001 · 88 82 72 70 65 62 62 413,
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS-Nnv-!:jl
HOll YMEAD
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 30 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 0 SELF CONTAINED 2
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 30 REDUCTIONS 4
LESS REDUCTIONS -4
RATED CAPACITY 650 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 585
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 715
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 68 70 82 71 76 73 77 449
1979 65 67 77 68 73 75 73 433
1980 67 69 77 69 75 71 73 434
1981 73 72 67 69 65 71 67 411
1982 66 81 82 65 70 75 71 444
1983 ' 70 ' 75 78 74 62 77 54 420
1984 79 77 60 63 59 56 52 367
1985 73 62 71 65 56 61 54 369
1986 80 71 64 80 63 72 58 408
1987 80 71 80 56 74 68 59 408
1988 90 100 68 69 57 74 59 427
1989 92 88 104 73 69 61 70 465
1990 00 101 97 112 74 73 61 518
Vy
1991 96 76 109 85 117 76 80 543
3 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
0.9228 1.0738 1.0089 1.0194 1.0517 1.0139
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 97 90 82 110 87 123 77 569
1993 101 93 97 83 112 92 125 602
1994 106 98 100 98 85 118 93 592
1995 112 103 105 101 100 89 120 618
1996 112 103 111 106 103 105 90 618
1997 * 115 106 111 112 108 108 106 651
1998 * 118 109 114 112 114 114 110 673
1999 * 129 119 117 115 114 120 116 701
2000 * 133 123 128 118 117 120 122 728
2001 * 137 126 132 129 120 123 122 7521
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS-Nnv-~1
"
MERIWETHER LEWIS
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 26 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS. OTHER 0 SELF CONTAINED 0
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 26 REDUCTIONS 2
LESS REDUCTIONS -2
RATED CAPACITY 600 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 540
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 660
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
o.
1978 31 33 35 43 54 55 46 266
1979 29 31 36 44 42 59 62 274
1980 36 38 40 42 42 46 67 275
1981 34 35 36 44 38 46 51 250
1982 37 40 42 40 43 36 49 250
1983 42 44 46 42 40 46 40 258
1984 42 45 54 47 43 42 49 280
1985 45 52 43 45 51 50 42 283
1986 45 67 50 43 46 52 54 312
1987 44 79 58 53 58 47 54 349
1988 51 84 63 66 62 68 55 398
1989 52 79 86 65 69 61 67 427
1990 56 61 76 84 70 81 60 432
1991 54 63 69 83 74 78 80 447
10 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1 .3062 1.0274 1.0265 1.063 1.0716 1.0487
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 55 72 65 71 88 79 82 457
1993 57 74 74 67 75 94 83 467
1994 60 78 76 76 71 80 99 480
1995 63 82 80 78 81 76 84 481
1996 63 82 84 82 83 87 80 498
1997 · 65 85 84 86 87 89 91 522
1998 · 67 88 87 86 91 93 93 538
1999 · 69 90 90 89 91 98 98 556
2000 · 71 93 92 92 95 98 103 573
200 1 . 73 95 96 94 98 102 103 5881
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
Ofi-Nnv-91
VIRGINIA L. MURRAY
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 16 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 3 SELF CONTAINED 2
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 19 REDUCTIONS 4
LESS REDUCTIONS -4
RATED CAPACITY 375 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 338
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 413
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 18 19 19 24 30 31 26 149
1979 17 18 21 24 24 33 35 155
1980 20 22 23 24 24 26 37 156
1981 19 19 20 24 21 26 29 139
1~82 21 22 23 23 24 21 28 141
1983 24 25 26 23 22 26 23 145
1984 23 25 31 26 24 24 27 157
1985 25 30 24 26 28 28 23 159
1986 26 38 28 24 26 29 31 176
1987 24 45 33 30 32 27 30 197
1988 29 47 35 37 35 39 31 224
1989 29 45 49 36 39 35 37 241
1990 32 30 38 57 37 48 34 244
1991 31 41 31 35 58 40 52 257
10 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.3145 1.0092 1,0294 1.0676 1.0946 1.0462
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 31 41 41 32 37 63 42 256
1993 32 42 41 42 34 40 66 265
1994 34 45 42 42 45 37 42 253
1995 36 47 45 43 45 49 39 268
1996 36 47 47 46 46 49 51 286
1997 · 37 49 47 48 49 50 51 294
1998 · 38 50 49 48 51 54 52 304
1999 · 39 51 50 50 51 56 56 314
2000 · 40 53 51 51 53 56 59 323
2001 . 41 54 53 52 54 58 59 330 I
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS-Nnv-~1
RED HILL
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 12 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 1 SELF CONTAINED 1
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 13 REDUCTIONS 3
LESS REDUCTIONS -3
RATED CAPACITY 250 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 225
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 275
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 20 21 23 18 28 24 27 141
1979 18 19 18 21 27 21 27 133
1980 20 21 21 15 20 26 20 123
1981 19 19 19 20 16 22 25 121
1982 13 19 21 16 17 22 22 117
1983 13 22 22 20 17 18 21 120
1984 14 29 19 17 19 17 17 118
1985 19 23 27 22 14 15 17 118
1986 21 38 23 25 21 13 19 139
1987 19 41 34 23 21 23 12 154
1988 20 39 34 32 24 25 24 178
1989 20 36 36 31 26 25 24 178
1990 22 30 28 39 34 29 24 184
1991 21 32 28 28 41 33 22 184
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.7675 0.893 0.977 0.9664 1.057 0.9853
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 21 37 29 27 27 43 33 196 .
1993 22 39 33 28 26 29 42 197
1994 23 41 35 32 27 27 29 191
1995 24 42 37 34 31 29 27 200
1996 24 42 38 36 33 33 29 211
1997 . 25 44 38 37 35 35 33 222
1998 · 26 46 39 37 36 37 34 229
1999 · 27 48 41 38 36 38 36 237
2000 · 28 49 43 40 37 38 37 244
2001 · 29 51 44 42 39 39 37 252 ,
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
Ofi-Nnv-91
SCOTTSVILLE
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 13 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 2 SELF CONTAINED 0
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 15 REDUCTIONS 2
LESS REDUCTIONS -2
RATED CAPACITY 325 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 293
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 358
.
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 25 26 29 36 38 32 36 197
1979 20 22 25 26 35 36 29 173
1980 29 31 24 27 30 37 34 183
1981 29 30 29 26 30 34 36 185
1982 41 37 30 31 23 27 35 183
1983 43 25 27 27 28 24 22 153
1984 46 31 29 27 31 27 22 167
1985 68 35 36 24 29 23 26 173
1986 48 39 29 46 21 30 26 191
1987 44 21 34 22 33 27 30 167
1988 58 23 28 35 21 33 26 166
1989 59 30 24 30 30 21 30 165
1990 64 34 29 27 30 32 23 175
1991 62 32 30 30 30 34 32 188
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
0.5404 0.9877 1.0495 0.9192' 1.0867 1.0163
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 62 34 32 31 28 33 35 193
1993 65 35 34 34 28 30 34 195
1994 69 37 35 36 31 30 30 199
1995 72 39 37 37 33 34 30 210
1996 72 39 39 39 34 36 35 222
1997 · 73 39 39 41 36 37 37 229
1998 · 74 40 39 41 38 39 38 235
1999 · 75 41 40 41 38 41 40 241
2000 · 77 42 40 42 38 41 42 245
2001 · 79 43 41 42 39 41 42 248.
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS-Nnv-~ 1
STONE ROBINSON
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 25 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 4 SELF CONTAINED 3
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 29 REDUCTIONS 5
LESS REDUCTIONS -5
RATED CAPACITY 600 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 540
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 660
,
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 49 52 56 53 77 73 77 388
1979 61 65 55 58 52 80 81 391
1980 47 50 85 40 57 52 86 370
1981 44 45 53 62 38 62 53 313
1982 39 70 46 63 53 41 67 340
1983 51 56 73 41 63 52 39 324
1984 58 76 69 73 47 69 63 397
1985 61 85 84 61 78 48 69 425
1986 71 104 86 75 57 68 42 432
1987 69 94 92 77 82 59 71 475
1988 69 105 89 69 73 85 63 484
1989 71 82 107 83 71 73 81 497
1990 76 87 84 95 84 74 71 495
1991 74 67 88 81 97 86 76 495
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.259 0.983 0.8872 1.0063 1.0016 0.9899
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 74 93 66 78 82 97 85 501
1993 78 98 91 59 78 82 96 504
1994 82 103 96 81 59 78 81 498
1995 86 108 101 85 82 59 77 512
1996 86 108 106 90 86 82 58 530
1997 · 88 111 106 94 91 86 81 569
1998 · 90 113 109 94 95 91 85 587
1999 · 92 116 111 97 95 95 90 604
2000 · 94 118 114 98 98 95 94 617
2001 · 96 121 116 101 99 98 94 629 ,
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS.Nov-!:)1
STONY POINT
SCHOOL CAPACllY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 12 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS. OTHER 2 SELF CONTAINED Q
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 14 REDUCTIONS 2
LESS REDUCTIONS -2
RATED CAPACllY 300 EFFECTIVE CAPACllY 270
MAXIMUM CAPACllY 330
,
'.
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 11 12 15 16 16 17 18 94
1979 14 15 13 20 10 16 15 89
1980 14 15 16 15 18 12 19 95
1981 19 19 21 18 16 14 11 99
1982 19 22 21 24 19 17 12 115
1983 22 23 22 20 24 18 16 123
1984 19 31 31 39 33 31 25 190
1985 22 39 33 31 37 36 33 209
1986 27 40 35 29 30 35 35 204
1987 25 50 30 41 37 30 35 223
1988 27 33 43 36 43 31 35 221
1989 27 44 38 41 39 46 30 238
1990 30 46 50 42 42 43 45 268
1991 28 46 50 50 39 42 40 267
3 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
1.6019 1 .1249 1.0196 1.0121 1.0574 0.9587
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 29 46 52 51 51 41 40 281'
1993 30 48 52 53 52 54 39 298
1994 32 51 54 53 54 55 52 319
1995 33 53 57 55 54 57 53 329
1996 33 53 60 58 56 57 55 339
1997 * 34 54 60 61 59 59 55 348
1998 * 35 56 61 61 62 62 57 359
1999 * 36 58 63 62 62 66 59 370
2000 * 37 59 65 64 63 66 63 380
2001 . 38 61 66 66 65 67 63 388.
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
OS-Nnv-91
YANCEY
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 11 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 2
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 0 SELF CONTAINED 0
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 11 REDUCTIONS 2
LESS REDUCTIONS -2
RATED CAPACITY 225 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 203
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 248
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 22 23 25 23 35 20 34 160
1979 27 29 32 21 25 27 21 155
1980 26 28 28 29 26 22 26 159
1981 29 30 30 27 28 28 29 172
1982 28 27 38 27 29 24 26 171
1983 30 31 34 34 30 30 31 190
1984 22 32 31 38 26 29 31 187
1985 19 34 28 28 36 27 24 177
1986 41 42 28 29 28 28 23 178
1987 29 26 36 34 25 28 27 176
1988 34 30 26 34 27 24 25 166
1989 35 28 33 19 32 29 28 169
1990 37 20 25 30 22 31 31 159
1991 36 33 22 30 32 27 31 175
3 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
B-K K-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
0.7524 1.031 0.9466 1.0552 1.09 1.0785
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 36 27 34 21 32 35 29 178 '
1993 38 29 28 32 22 35 38 184
1994 40 30 30 27 34 24 38 183
1995 42 32 31 28 28 37 26 182
1996 42 32 33 29 30 31 40 195
1997 . 43 32 33 31 31 33 33 193
1998 · 44 33 33 31 33 34 36 200
1999 · 45 34 34 31 33 36 37 205
2000 · 46 35 35 32 33 36 39 210
2001 . 47 35 36 33 34 36 39 213.
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
Ofi-Nnv-!H
TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS, REGULAR 264 PULL OUT PROGRAMS 29
# CLASSROOMS, OTHER 20 SELF CONTAINED 21
TOTAL CLASSROOMS 284 REDUCTIONS 50
LESS REDUCTIONS (50)
RATED CAPACITY 5,850 EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 5,268
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 6,438
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
BIRTH
5 YEARS K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
PRIOR
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 538 577 623 674 773 708 736 4,091
1979 548 596 623 596 661 731 746 3,953
1980 558 603 672 606 618 651 764 3.914
1981 607 630 634 608 578 605 658 3,713
1982 568 685 683 601 580 567 629 3,745
1983 666 674 682 616 596 577 564 3,709
1984 668 742 702 677 585 567 576 3,849
1985 702 752 705 632 677 598 565 3,929
1986 768 866 700 688 630 663 568 4,115
1987 710 865 847 689 724 631 677 4,433
1988 816 885 879 782 716 732 667 4,661
1989 831 908 890 865 785 714 723 4,885
1990 902 907 905 892 859 808 730 5,101
1991 870 815 871 885 871 830 800 5,072
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 878 930 819 853 887 882 843 5,214 '
1993 916 968 930 806 849 890 895 5,338
1994 964 1018 966 912 805 852 903 5,456
1995 1013 1068 1016 946 912 812 865 5,619
1996 1013 1068 1068 996 947 917 823 5,819
1997 · 1038 1097 1068 1047 997 951 930 6,090
1998 · 1064 1126 1095 1047 1048 1002 965 6,283
1999 · 1098 1163 1124 1075 1048 1053 1015 6,478
2000 · 1126 1191 1161 1102 1076 1053 1067 6,650
2001 · 1155 1221 1190 1139 1103 1081 1067 6.801 I
ESTIMATED BIRTH DATA
Ofi.Nov.!i1
BURLEY
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# CLASSROOMS 25
RATED CAPACITY@ 25 PER 625
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY@ 90 % 563
MAXIMUM CAPACITY@ 110% 688
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
SELF TOTAL
CONTAINED 6 7 8 MIDDLE
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 22 115 119 144 400
1979 21 126 115 112 374
1980 21 106 127 113 367
1981 21 126 108 124 379
1982 21 114 156 113 404
1983 19 95 123 153 390
1984 17 106 129 123 375
1985 17 140 119 123 399
1986 17 129 141 137 424
1987 17 141 131 143 432
1988 18 166 149 127 460
1989 19 136 158 145 458
1990 24 155 123 143 445
1991 23 153 140 114 430
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
5-6 6-7 7-8
1.016 0.9731 0.99
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 25 160 149 139 473
1993 ,26 163 156 148 493
1994 28 177 159 154 518
1995 29 210 172 157 568
1996 29 204 204 170 607
1997 28 174 199 202 603
1998 27 206 169 197 599
1999 28 211 201 167 607
2000 30 235 205 199 669
2001 31 223 229 203 686
,
05-Nov-91
HENLEY
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# OF CLASSROOMS 30
RATED CAPACITY@ 25 PER 750
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY @ 90% 675
MAXIMUM CAPACITY @ 110% 825
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
SELF TOTAL
CONTAINED 6 7 8 MIDDLE
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 27 238 240 271 776
1979 26 237 238 249 750
1980 25 255 , 247 247 774
1981 25 247 253 238 763
1982 25 216 251 265 757
1983 24 190 203 258 ,675
1984 21 182 186 220 609
1985 21 175 187 199 582
1986 21 172 182 203 578
1987 21 204 170 192 587
1988 22 202 203 180 607
1989 23 220 210 201 654
1990 21 219 220 213 673
1991 30 204 229 222 685
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
5-6 6-7 7-8
1.0662 1.0181 1.0355
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 32 273 208 237 750
1993 34 271 278 215 798
1994 36 254 276 288 854
1995 37 275 259 286 857
1996 37 242 280 268 827
1997 36 231 246 290 803
1998 36 278 235 255 804
1999 37 292 283 243 855
2000 39 310 297 293 939
2001 41 303 316 308 968
I
05-Nov-91
JOUETT
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# OF CLASSROOMS 30
..
RATED CAPACITY@ 25 PER 750
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY@ 90% 675
MAXIMUM CAPACITY @ 110% 825
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
SELF TOTAL
CONTAINED 6 7 8 MIDDLE
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 29 201 208 241 679
1979 28 221 200 231 680
1980 27 223 219 203 672
1981 28 222 251 200 701
1982 27 175 200 244 646
1983 26 198 186 214 624
1984 23 165 163 181 532
1985 23 166 170 170 529
1986 23 167 173 159 522
1987 23 176 164 170 533
1988 24 198 181 157 560
1989 25 180 207 190 602
1990 25 208 170 185 588
1991 14 202 218 172 606
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
5-6 6-7 7-8
1.0793 1.0151 0.9717
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 15 224 205 212 656
1993 16 244 227 199 686
1994 17 263 248 221 749
1995 17 262 267 241 787
1996 17 251 266 259 793
1997 17 205 255 259 736
1998 17 242 208 248 715
1999 17 243 246 202 708
2000 18 262 247 239 766
2001 19 280 266 240 805
I
05-Nov-91
WALTON
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# OF CLASSROOMS 32
RATED CAPACITY@ 25 PER 800
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY @ 90 % 720
MAXIMUM CAPACITY @ 110% 880
I
SCHOOL EN ROLLM ENT
SELF TOTAL
CONTAINED 6 7 8 MIDDLE
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 39 178 246 182 645
1979 38 170 176 241 625
1980 38 175 179 176 568
1981 38 181 175 167 561
1982 38 166 187 170 561
1983 36 165 179 180 560
1984 33 128 169 171 501
1985 31 135 127 158 451
1986 32 148 149 129 458
1987 32 108 149 144 433
1988 33 153 112 147 445
1989 35 179 141 113 468
1990 39 186 157 145 527
1991 39 167 183 142 531
..
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
5-6 6-7 7-8
0.9834 0.9883 0,9851
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 42 176 165 180 563
1993 44 186 174 163 567
1994 47 209 184 171 611
1995 49 178 207 181 615
1996 49 179 176 204 608
1997 47 177 177 173 574
1998 46 178 175 174 573
1999 47 193 176 172 588
2000 51 193 191 173 608
2001 53 197 191 188 629
I
05-Nov-91
TOTAL MIDDLE SCHOOL
SCHOOL CAPACITY
# OF CLASSROOMS 117
RATED CAPACITY@ 25 PER 2,925
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY @ 90 % 2,633
MAXIMUM CAPACITY@ 110% 3,218
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
SELF TOT AL
CONTAINED 6 7 8 MIDDLE
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 117 732 813 838 2,500
1979 113 754 729 833 2,429
1980 111 759 772 739 2,381
1981 112 776 787 729 2,404
1982 111 671 794 792 2,368
1983 105 648 691 805 2,249
1984 94 581 647 695 2,017
1985 92 616 603 650 1,961
1986 93 616 645 628 1,982
1987 93 629 614 649 1,985
1988 97 719 645 611 2,072
1989 102 715 716 649 2,182
1990 109 768 670 686 2,233
1991 106 726 770 650 2,252
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1991 114 833 727 768 2,442
1992 120 864 835 725 2,544
1993 128 903 867 834 2,732
1994 132 925 905 865 2,827
1995 132 876 926 901 2,835
1996 128 787 877 924 2,716
1997 126 904 787 874 2,691
1998 129 939 906 784 2,758
1999 138 1000 940 904 2,982
2000 144 1003 1002 939 3,088
I
05-Nov-91
ALBEMARLE
SCHOOL CAPACITY
RATED CAPACITY
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY
MAXIMUM CAPACITY
CURRENT
1,625
1 ,463
1,788
RENOVATED
1,745
1,571
1,920
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
GRADE
9
GRADE
10
GRADE
11
GRADE
12
TOTAL
HIGH
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 544 495 438 439 1,916
1979 502 485 475 410 1,872
1980 519 473 447 421 1,860
1981 424 449 397 416 1,686
1982 431 375 436 404 1,646
1983 486 385 369 427 1,667
1984 505 411 355 339 1,610
1985 ' 494 394 397 353 1,638
1986 488 416 398 405 1,707
1987 457 395 353 410 1,615
1988 449 369 361 348 1,527
1989 423 400 323 344 1,490
1990 470 395 377 348 1,590
1991 497 416 350 393 1,656
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
8-9
1.2431
9-10
0.8553
10-11
0.906
11-12
1 .0053
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 456 425 377 352 1,610
1993 562 390 385 379 1,716 "
1994 539 481 353 387 1,760
1995 576 461 436 355 1,828
1996 599 493 418 438 1,948
1997 661 513 447 421 2,042
1998 667 566 465 450 2,148
1999 646 571 513 468 2,198
2000 571 553 518 516 2,158
2001 689 489 502 521 2,201
,
Ofi-Nov.!:} 1
WESTERN
SCHOOL CAPACITY
RATED CAPACITY 1,300
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY 1,170
MAXIMUM CAPACITY 1,430
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
GRADE GRAD E GRADE GRADE TOTAL
9 10 11 12 HIGH
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 362 339 302 293 1,296
1979 402 336 317 262 1,317
1980 319 385 317 298 1,319
1981 322 304 330 287 1,243
1982 333 283 288 304 1,208
1983 332 261 262 256 1,111
1984 299 282 273 260 1,114
1985 273 271 282 264 1,090
1986 288 261 273 283 1,105
1987 291 251 256 253 1,051
1988 296 252 246 237 1,031
1989 265 259 240 208 972
1990 265 227 234 208 934
1991 323 246 222 223 1,014
6 YEAR AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATES
8-9
1.0497
9-10
0.9054
10-11
0,9827
11-12
0.9331
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 303 292 242 207 1,044
1993 329 274 287 226 1,116 "
1994 305 298 269 268 1,140
1995 392 276 293 251 1,212
1996 402 355 271 273 1,301
1997 393 364 349 253 1,359
1998 403 356 358 326 1 ,443
1999 375 365 350 335 1,425
20001 361 340 359 327 1,387
2001 425 327 335 335 1 ,422
I
O!i-Nov-A 1
HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL
SCHOOL CAPACITY
RATED CAPACITY
EFFECTIVE CAPACITY
MAXIMUM CAPACITY
CURRENT
2,925
2,633
3,218
RENOVATED
3,045
2,741
3,350
I
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
GRADE
9
GRADE
10
GRADE
11
GRADE
12
TOTAL
HIGH
SCHOOL
ACTUAL ENROLLMENT HISTORY
1978 906 834 740 732 3,212
1979 904 821 792 672 3,189
1980 838 858 764 719 3,179
1981 746 753 727 703 2,929
1982 764 658 724 708 2,854
1983 818 646 631 683 2,778
1984 804 693 628 599 2,724
1985 767 665 679 617 2,728
1986 776 677 671 688 2,812
1987 748 646 609 663 2,666
1988 745 621 607 585 2,558
1989 688 659 563 552 2,462
19901 735 622 611 556 2,524
1991 820 662 572 616 2,670
PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS
1992 759 717 619 559 2,654
1993 891 664 672 605 2,832 "
1994 844 779 622 655 2,900
1995 968 737 729 606 3,040
1996 1,001 848 689 711 3,249
1997 1,054 877 796 674 3,401
1998 ' 1,070 922 823 776 3,591
1999 1,021 936 863 803 3,623
2000 932 893 877 843 3,545
2001 1,114 816 837 856 3,623
I
OS-Nnv-~1
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CLASSROOM CAPACITIES
SCHOOL
CLASSROOMS I CLASSROOMS
AVAILABLE RESERVED
REGULAR OTHER TOTAL RESOURCE SELF TOTAL
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
CLASSROOM
CAPACITY
MAX RATED EFFECTIVE
AGNQR,Hl)RT ..
BROADUS WOOD
BROWNSVILLE
CALE
CROZET
GREER
HOLL YMEAD
MERIWETHER
MURRAY
RED HILL
, SCOTTSVILLE
STONY POINT
STONE ROBINSON
WOODBROOK
YANCEY
15 1
17 1
24 3
17 2
29
30
26
16 3
12 1
13 2
12 2
25 4
17 1
11
SUBTOTAL (CURRENT)
264 20
$JJB.TQJAL(E)(PANpE[)}>: 288 >30.'.3H3
MIDDLE SCHOOLS I
251
BURLEY 25
HENLEY 30 30
JOUETT 30 30
WAL TON 32 32
I
SUBTOTAL 117 1171
I
HIGH SCHOOLS
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE (RENOV,4, TED)/.'..
WESTERN
SUBTOTAL (CURREND
.$LJBIQTAL (RENOVATED) <
16 2 2 385 350 315
1,8 2 3 5 358 325 293
27 3 3 6 578 525 473
19 2 1 3 440 400 360
29 2 3 5 660 600 540
30 2 2 4 715 650 585
26 2 2 660 600 540
19 2 2 4 413 375 338
13 2 1 3 275 250 225
15 2 2 358 325 293
14 2 2 330 300 270
29 2 3 5 660 600 540
18 2 3 5 358 325 293
11 2 2 248 225 203
284 29 21 50 6,438 5,850 5,268
688
825
825
880
625
750
750
800
563
675
675
720
3,218
2,925
2,633
1,430
1,170
1,300
3,218
2,925
2,633
.... ...., ..-,.....-,..............
..- -, ........ .".' . -.-...
.. ,--- .."..... ."....-_...-.
.----- .--. .....,.. -.-..
..-,- ....... .....--....-._- .
,..--.. ,- .... .'. --.-."
. -.---."--," '...
. '... - .-.,,'. .
. ...... ....... ..
TOTAL REGULAR INSTRUCTION
TOTAL (EXPANDED &RENOVATED)<.'.'.....
12,874
11,700
1 0,534
'.', 13,666:12;42611,182.
PLEASE NOTE! The availability 01 additional seK contained classrooms at Murray (2) and the Agnor-Hurt Elementary school (6) will allow the
relocation of existing sell contained classes currently housed at other elementary schools, This action will have the effect 01 increasing the
capacity 01 the affected schools lrom which classes will be moved,
06-Nov-91
c::J
~ ~;~~
~ '3";".;'"
~ fl;&'I:..
~o{-.,
~
l<<~'" '
to
~ C/) C/) C/) JJ ~ ~ ). ~ e5 G) ~ () to to- m
U> d d () 0 ~ gj G) C/) JJ JJ JJ JJm r-
C <: 0 ~ ::n g r- rn r- ~ 0 OX m
OJ () <: <: ~ ~ ~ r- gj rn ~ ).0 3:
~ ~ -I rn rn -< :::r: ." ~ l1i t)~ m
~ j;l 'tl 0 r::: () to
r -< JJ ""0 -< -i C:O Z
~ ~ "0 m -I S r- ~ :::r: 0 JJ ~ C/) C/)m ~
a. /5 g, ~ > > 0 0 ~ <: 0 S
III CIl , to ~ r- ~ (f)
x- :::r g ::c r- gj i;! 0 t) r- :0 U>
~ f m ~ -i rn -i ;:J;: r- (f) -< ()
.. a. ::; Z C/) ~ rn 0 m ::r:
.. 0 , (f)
:::r :::r :7 in -4 0 0 t) (') 0
III III ~ "T1
0.. a. CD !!! <: I :r: 0
5' ~ n co 0
a. ~ co 0 ,
CQ c: ~ Ii)' 0
5' 0 Gl 3 Q) Z 0
0.. c: a ~ :::r Q) ,
~ Gl a. :7 -I (f)
III :7 0- )>
III ~ ~
c; [ a ] Q) Z
en 8 0-
~ [ ~ ~ m
::l 0 ::l 0
iii 5'
'< ~ 5" ~ CQ (f)
~
III :7 ~ 2- -I
~ ~ 0.. 2- C
5' '< 8- :7 :7 I I~
~ ~ .--.1 (..) 0
=: III 3 ~ '"0 '"010) m
:::r ~ III en > I\) I\) 0) (..) (..) I\) I~ 0) .... (..) --.I 0) O'l --.I I~ (..) (..) IX
0' 5" a ~ CQ 0 "" 0) (..) O'l --.I --.I 0) CD 0) .... O'l .... 0) --.I to O'l CD Z
:::r 8 ::l CD CD 0 0 CD O'l (..) :(..) 0 ....0 0 CD O'l 0 CD co CD O'l -I
:7 =: a g !B ()
:::r 3 I >
~ c;"
3 :::r 3 en c: I i~ "'0
!!1 ~ :7 ~ ::>. 0) I\) '-4 >
::l ~ m i.n I\) 0) (..) (..) I\) to 1(..) 0) '"ro 10) .... (..) 0) 0) O'l --.I I./>.. (..) (..) 1m ()
3' Q. S?- CD co O'l I\) 0 0 I\) O'l --.I 1--.1 0 0 :0 0 I\) O'l 0 I\) I\) '0 I\) O'l 10 ~
c: 3' ~ 3 0 01 0 0 01 0 01 i01 0 0 io 0 O'l 0 0 O'l O'l 10 O'l 0
3 :::r ~ 1m -<
~ ~ 3 ::l
j;l a III iii I~
"2 ~ n 8- -< I )>
:::r .O'l I\)
>< 8 III
Q, g c; CIl co I\) 01 I\) I\) I\) co i(..) O'l <.n 'O'l I\) O'l O'l ./>.. 0) 1(..) I\) (..) I~ iO r-
n
.:c ~ in ~ :::r to 0 ./>.., --.I 1.0 I\) --.I ,(..) ./>.. I\) I./>.. to 1.0 co ./>.. --.I O'l 10) to .... m
1.D Co 5' 0 co (..) 0 0 (..) 01 co lCO 0 .... 10 0 (..) O'l 0 (..) (..) ,0 (..) O'l ir m
en Gl f2- I>
~ !. :7 s:
>< CD III to.o'.
g i" 1.D III x ~I ~I ,en )>
n CQ ~ ....,-i ien
~ Co III
~ 8 ~ .... "" I\) .... .... --.I II\) ./>.. (..) 0) O'l ./>.. O'll(") I\) ...... CClC 1:0 :a
~ 'Ai,:
~ ::l --.I 1.0 0) co co 0 I~ ./>.. 01 O'l co --.I --.III\) 01 ,~,: r-:>> 10 r-
p. j;l l' Q. 8 01 01 --.I co ./>.. ./>.. "'-I "'-I O'l .... O'l --.10 "'-I :@::: '<>,' m
"0 3' ::l '0
CD iii Is;: n
!? ~ ~ to
'< ? ~I 1" I\) 0
0.. ...... liD :0
0- ~ n .... 01 1'\)7-.. .... --.I I~ ./>.. .... I./>.. I\) O'l O'l (..) O'l 1(,,) I\) :~" c:
5- lli' --.I 0 co to to .... O'l O'l '0) .... 0) I\) co co l~ O'l :-.::: (..) :)> z
Gl ~ III co .... ..... (..) 0) (..) "'-I O'l 101 O'l to 0 0) I\) "'-I [1:1 I~
0 Gl III -i
C(l i 3 a -<
z CD 0 to I~
0 5' 5' 3 .O'l I I\) (..) "
< III en iD
~ go :;- ~ (..) .... 01 I,i' .... .... --.I II\) ./>.. N I~ I\) 0) O'l (..) O'l !~ I\) ,(4', c:
CQ (..) CO 0 to to to (..) ,0) 0) ./>.. (..) 0 I\) to CO 0) :;.,: ./>.. ,-<
0' 0' CO ./>.. ./>.. CO 01 --.I I\) iO'l "'-I 0) 1(..) (..) I\) to to "'-I ,..... 0) 10 m
=: ~ 0- r-
3 ~ .:-:.:.:.:. 10
CD ~ ~ '~I to Iz (;
>< Co I\) ./>..
3' n ~ (..)< w :e:: iD I." en
lli' Co .... "" .... .... "'-I 'I\) ./>.. Ig I\) O'l O'l "" 0) 1(,,) I\)
c: en CO to ..... to to (..) 101 CD 0 (..) to O'l I\) .... i~ CO I: n
3 co 0' Ir
8 (..) CO to to .... (..) ,(..) 0 CO ..... I\) (..) 0> CO .... :::t
~ :7 10
~ "'0 0
3 :D l-i
CD .. CQ ~I len 0
!? a I\) ...... 10'l 0
-:c c: .... 01 (..) I\) I\) ~ II\)'/>" W I~ I\) 0) O'l t 0>'(,,) I\) ,~'~ I: '- r-
"0
en- co .... 1\). .... 0 ,0) ,co CD ./>.. .... O'l ./>.. O'l to m en
I\) I\) to 0 0 to ICD .... ./>.. (..) co to "'-I 0).0 0> ~M:~ ()
~ ...... -I
.... m
0- I ...... 0
5" O'l ...... I\)
~ co .... ~d~'~ I\) "'-I II\) "" '".!:. 10'l I\) 0> O'l "" (l)(..) (..) ,:t': liD m
Co .... to .... CD ICD to 01 'I\) 01 .... to 0> '"'-I 01 .... --.I Z
to 01 .... ./>.. iO) co ./>.. lco 0 co 01 (..) 'N'"'-I O'l ,Nt :D
.. 0
..... to ,
.0) I .d ~i 01 .:.:.:.:.:. "'-I ,
c.n ,tiS,'l\) .'-.i"(,,) ::iiii,~ I~ s::
0 .... I\) {;O I\) O'l I\) 0> 0> ./>.. (..) m
1.0 to 0> ~, I\) I\) .... to I\) 0>0'l O'l O'l I\) CD .;,..... "'-I (..) ~~,[
0 (..) to ,(Q, to I\) 0) ./>.. I\) 0> ,to I\) .... I\) I\) ""--.I --.I Z
-I
'to
0) I .... 1'1>, I~
......
N I\) O'l ,~' I\) I\) 0:)(..) O'l 1n0'l I\) 0> 0> ./>.. '-.i (..) (..) :~::
co 0 CD (..) I\) ""0 (..) .01 "'-I 0> "'-I ./>.. to (..)',CD ./>.. ,to
(..) 0 --.I :to" 01 to N ./>.. co :0:0) 0 (..) (..) CD f":, "'-I "'-I :0:: ItO
..
~I ~l\):. ..... to
--
I\) 0> Q.I\) N CD (..) O'l ""'-I. O'l I\) "'-I 0> O'l ;;.;j. (..) (..) ,;;iii:, 0
0 0 ,,"'I"'/>" (..) "'-I .... O'l (..).to "'-I 0 0> .... O'l to O'l ,0'1', 0
01 ./>.. Q,' .... ""l' :O./>.. 0> co.::~ 0 .... I\) ./>.. 1\)--.1 01 ,=':
, ..
.... 0
il .. .~'. '0
d d Is
I\) 0> Q" I\) N CO(..) O'l (#0> I\) --.I 0> O'l ';"'" ./>.. (..) ';;;;'~
.... .... af ./>.. ./>.. to I\) --.I .... 0 "'-I I\) co I\) 0>0 0> ,~,:
0 "'-I .0.' O'l "" 0> (..) (..) "'-IO'l 0> co 0 co co O'l (..) :m:\
(,.......,,\
0) I N' .- I~ ":u ri;..,J
:'~.~
CD I\) 0> ,Q:, I\) N to (..) O'l -co 0> I\) "'-I 0> O'l :!:~ (..) '4,' c:;:, j,i...ii: "-
0 .... I\) g: ./>.. 01 .... (..) co (0'-," co O'l to (..) 0> ar 10
~ (..) to CD I\) co 0 co (1).. "'-I (..) I\) 01 to to II\) "1A't.~ it.:..
...... ..... ""'"0"'.
~ ~,""t I
..
'''".........~
d
-t
)>
r-
JJ
m
(;)
C
r-
)>
JJ
Z
en
-t
JJ
C
0
-t
0
Z
(.oJ
~
"'-l
en
I\)
1n
I\)
0
N
"'-l
I\)
.\0
\0
\0
,j>.
....
0
(.)
....
0
0
'i'
z ....
0 9
<
~ "'-l
....
(.oJ
....
....
"0
(X)
(X)
....
....
~
(X)
(Jl
~
....
\0
0
I\)
!"
I\)
0
en
....
I\)
1n
en
,j>.
!"
(X)
(Jl
(X)
_(.oJ
"'-l
"'-l
(.oJ
1n
.
"il
il
en
c
OJ
d
-t
)>
r-
J5
m
z
o
<
)>
-t
m
g
~'.' ):.........I:J:
l1i),.; r- zl5
(f) ti; ~ ~ I:J:
~~ ~ c:len
:0 ".. ):; 010
<: ):;:JJ m I:J:
:JJ r- en 10
Ii; rn eniO
.... m:r-
""",..' r-Ien
:0 "Tl
rn. .
<:. 0
o 0
z
~.. ;!
~.. z
,tJ.. m
-. 0
en
-t
c:
....................0
- - . m
,j>.\o"'-lZ
(,oJI\)OO-t
0000$
(.)~Cn
0,j>.1\)
0(Jl(Jl
~I
~I
~l
-....1n~
"'-l"'-len
0"" (,oJ
~...i/
o en'
........ 01'
,j>. en'
..........~:.:
om.
tb
~.I.
I\)
~l
~':~':
.......:'J.:
..... ......;
en en: .
........;,;".,,;::.
.......:.~.
.l::oen.
00'.
~..I
.0
~::-:~
1\)00.
~,:f\)':
fI,)OO'
'......'.....'...1
y
'~.
';';';"::~:::
8~::
.'...'..'.....'..1'
~.
:~:
i;~':
(J'I'.~;.
::ii.,i,1
:~'~::
~:%::
'.'.".'....1
~:
;q;J;
:m:~.
,..'............\
;t.);
~'
;I~{
t~::
~ii::
'...'...'.'..'.....1
'W
'in'
fA
:....... jll.)::
(,oJ.~::
(X) '0.=
""'-1.0).:
'...."'.".'..\
i@.
'10>)
'~.
.....ti.j::
.l::o .",::
~a..:
en
c
OJ
d
~
r;
'<:::t..:r:to~:C
);:Ornc:z-
r-~~~~g
d-irnrnc:r-
<:-i-<-<om
men
eno
en:J:
mO
r-c
"Tlr-
hen
o
z
-t
~
Z
m
o
en
-t
c:
o
m
ooooooenz
OOI\)I\)OO-t
O(Jl(JlOO$
~I
~I OO"'-l"'-len
0(Jl(Jl1\)
000(Jl
il ""'-Ienen(Jl
I\)"'-l"'-len
O(Jl(Jl(,oJ
~I
(Jlenen,j>.
(,oJ 0 (X) (,oJ
....en(JlO
il
(Jl en""l'';>'
en (Jl.(J'I."'-l
(.oJ eno.(,oJ
~I
(Jlc".;,;j,j>.
en OO(!) \0
""len-..j(,oJ
'....:.'..'.:....'1
10.
.N
<..:I
,t\)
en~ ::OS.: (Jl
........ ..,::..-:01:;.......
....(:1:;0
ixl..~.
ti:l
t\)
.01.
en.;,;j .df: (Jl.
.... (X) .Ut.': 0) .
(JlN:w:fcJ .
_.1\)..... .1..
Q:l:
w.
,j>.
.,.,.,..........-.....
..... ........--.
enG.:O;l::~
g.~~.g
'...............'l.
I\)
::i
(11
.. .-.....,--.
..,--.-.', ,. '.
.... .... ,.- .
........ ...-_...
.....-...........
...-.. ......_--.
-:-:-:::-:->:..:.:-:.:-::-;
(Jl ,.;,;j(j)d):;.
""'-1<..:10..0.'"
,j>.,OlW.1\)",!:
~..j..
01
........... '..
............- .
.. .......... ,
. ..........-.
...., . ........
....... ........
. ..... .......
..-. ..-...,.....
.-.. .-..-."-.'
(Jl""l (il...<.n.
""'-I....O..(!),'
(,oJ(Jl<..:l(!)'
...1\)...........].
~.
(11,
~.
.... .............
.. ..-.......,...
.".. ....... -.
........... .....
.... .......... ..
(Jl~:C{m
(X) 0 ;Ut.:.Q.
(X) tx):8:r~
-.~......l..
(Xl
t\).
~~:~::m .
(X) 0) .w::(!)
@j....
(Xl'
,N
. . . . . . -.
en (X) ''U)}en
I\) o~: (X)
\0 (11,S',O)
.
.
en
()
::r:
o
o
r-
,;.:
>
x
()
::0 )>
I~ iJ
)>
m ()
0 ~
m
."
." >
m
Ig 10 r
tIJ
:;:: I' m
bf)' I~ s:
.... -f. I~ >
us'C: :a
lrr~ r
-:......,... I~ m
..'
\0 0
'I\) 0
-- <()
\0 C
W > Z
"'U
> -4
\0 0 -<
IW ."
1__ ?
I~ c
to
1\0 I~ C
l.l::o 0
liD en
1(Jl ,"T! 0
I c
0 :I:
1\0 ~ -; 0
1(Jl 0 CJ) 0
!(?j c- r
len m en
1\0 ~
len 0
liD m
"'-lz
JJ
0
\Or-
"'-lr-
iDS::
oom
z
-t
\0
(X)
iD
\0
\0
\0
--
0
0
0
0
--
0
0 ~.,'
.... ~
I~ -'':(I ~t
~'::'lidi:1
-.;;C ~'iio11
~f,\~,'~r
.
.
MOBILE CLASSROOM LOCATIONS
FOR
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOLS
SCHOOL NAME
NUMBER OF
MOBILE CLASSROOMS:
Albemarle High School
10*
Broadus Wood Elementary School
5
Brownsville Elementary School
1
Greer Elementary School
1
Henley Middle School
4
Hollymead Elementary School
Jouett Middle School
4
2*
Meriwether Lewis Elementary School
1
Red Hill Elementary School
1
Woodbrook Elementary School
6
TOTAL:
35
*One trailer is only 12' wide and is used
for office space only.
" ...
..
25-Oct-91
1991 AGNOR-HURT REDISTRICTING
(EXCLUDES SELF-CONTAINED STUDENTS)
FROM:
CALE
GREER
HOLL YMEAD
WOODBROOK
TOT ALmmm:::zi\::mm:::m:~::::::mmm:::i:l$'m:mm"m::~:m:m:::::m:iiQ,mmmm:m'~m::\i';\I",\,'\,I~11 .
"
...
AGENDA ITEM NAME
f! OlwrJu/t) 13, q I
!
q /. 09//,4/73
r'/ q ;J. - q J C rAp'du iJllfur.iJlxuJ f3L~/~
'-fuJJit !iWL~9 93 g&.1XM'U 1
DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO.
~ UNTIL
Form. 3
7/25/86