HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201500020 Plan - Submittal (First) Initial Site Plan 2015-05-22 �plF,�A
Nose ,41•0
. I-„iilll rr
ts
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
May 15,2015
RE: SDP201500020 Inglewood Terrace-Initial Site Plan
Tax Map Parcel 061K0-10-00-000A0 &061K0-10-00-000A2
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to notify you that the following development proposal has been submitted to the County for
review:
SDP201500020 Inglewood Terrace-Initial Site Plan
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Jack Jouett
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 061K0-10-00-000A0& 061K0-10-00-000A2
LOCATION: 1708 Inglewood Drive
PROPOSAL:Request for initial site plan approval for a bonus level cluster development with 9 new
townhome units on 1.71 acres.
ZONING: R-4 Residential-4 units/acre
AIRPORT IMPACT AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT: Yes
PROFFERS:No
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood Density Residential — residential (3-6 units/acre);
supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools, and other small-scale non-residential uses.
PETITION: Chapter 18 Section 32 Site Plan, Section 15, and Section 2.4
This development proposal is scheduled for the Site Review Committee meeting on the date listed below.
The applicant's attendance is not mandatory,although it may be requested by the County. Regardless of
whether the applicant will be attending,the County staff will be available for consultation on the Site
Review Committee meeting date at 10:00 a.m., in Room 235 of the County Office Building on McIntire
Road in Charlottesville. This meeting will be an informal session with the Site Review Committee to
discuss issues and share information.
Prior to the Site Review Committee meeting,the Site Review Committee will review the development
proposal for compliance with the applicable ordinances or other applicable laws. At the Site Review
Committee meeting, on the date noted below, one of two things will happen, either;
1. Staff will provide a recommendation of approval stating the requirements that must be included
with submittal of the final site plan and those conditions which must be satisfied prior to approval
of the final site plan and, where applicable,those conditions which must be satisfied prior to
issuance of a grading permit.
OR
w.r
•
2. Staff will provide a recommendation of disapproval stating the reasons fro disapproval by
identifying the plan's deficiencies and citing the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance or
other applicable laws,and what corrections or modifications will permit approval of the plan.
Within fifteen (15)days of the disapproval of the initial site plan the developer will be able to
resubmit a revised plan.
Dates scheduled for this development proposal are:
Site Review comments available (June 2,2015)
Site Review Committee meeting date (June 4,2015, 10 a.m.)
Plans for the proposed development are available for your review in the Department of Community
Development. To assure the file information is ready for your viewing and to allow staffto be available to help
with any questions, we encourage you to schedule a viewing time. Please call 296-5832 ext3443 during
business hours(8 a.m.-5 p.m.,Mon-Fri)to schedule an appointment. While an appointment is not required,we
do give priority to those with appointments. Those without appointments may fmd the materials are in use by
others and/or staff is not available to help. Should you wish to attend the Site Review Committee meeting,
please notify the Department of Community Development so that any concerns may be adequately addressed.
Sincerely,
Christopher Perez
Senior Planner
Planning
/CH
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS
1707 SOLOMON LLC
BOLLINGTON,JOHN
BUNN,JAMES E JR
EARLY,JOHN H OR MARY ANN
FAYEN-ENGEL,MARGARET
FORLOINES INVESTMENTS LLC
GILLISPIE,BRIAN B OR JENNIFER M
HAYBA, ANTHONY JOSEPH OR ALICIA R
INGLEWOOD LLC C/O CHARLES E MARSHALL
KOEHN,FRANCES B
MILLER,LEIMON THOMAS OR VIRGINIA L
STELL,MELISSA Y
cc: Justin Shimp
201 E Main Street Suite M
Charlottesville,VA 22902
File SDP201500020
SHIMP PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING
October 15, 2015
MR. Christopher Perez
Senior Civil Engineer
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Regarding: Inglewood Terrace—Initial Site Plan SDP 201500020
Dear Mr. Perez,
Thank you for your review of the preliminary site plan for Inglewood Terrace. We have
revised the plans per NDS comments dated June 3, 2015. Please find below a detailed comment response
letter describing the changes we have made to each of your comments.
1. This comment has been noted.
ACCESS
2. This matter has been taken care of. The entrance of Inglewood Drive has now a 50' ROW, in which
half will be given to both the adjacent neighbors on TMP
3. We will ensure that VDOT approves proposed entrance before final submittal.
4. The end of state maintenance label has been added to C2 of the site plan. Don't have topo to show
existing conditions of TMP 061 K0-05-01300
5. Inglewood Drive has been adjusted to match the plat from 1996.
PRIVATE STREET
6. This comment has been noted, the private street request will be submitted prior to final site plan
submittal.
7. We will be submitting an exception request for curb and landscape strip requirement.
8. The private street label has been updated to say"Private Street Easement".
9. The setbacks have been updated for Lots 4-9 to meet the 5' minimum from the private street
easement.
10. The setbacks for Lots 1-3 have been updated to not exceed 25'from the easement..
11. We are planning to use a form of permeable pavement in the parking lot area in lieu of curbs.
12. We have added bumper blocks to each of the spaces in the parking lot area.
13. We have dimensioned the parallel parking spaces, and added labels to the parking widths in the lot.
We can assure you the parking spaces in the lot are not uneven.
14. A landscape plan will be provided with the final site plan.
15. The house on Lot 1 has been shifted toward the road to avoid interference with the waterline
easement.
16. We believe it to be an intermittent stream that is typically dry and lined with riprap on this site. We will
work with engineering staff to make sure that we are correct,
17. First, we have added the"stream"to sheet C4 in order to see how the pipe ties in. Yes, the retaining
wall is acting as a dam to prevent flooding into the lots. There will not be any grading in the open
space D, but the wall is placed so that the bottom elevation is at existing grade, and is tall enough to
prevent any flooding. We did perform a drainage study taking into account a 31-acre drainage area
using county GIS. We calculated the 100 year flow using Regression Equations. We then used a
headwater depth chart from Appendix 8C-1 VDOT Drainage Manual. Based on this, we wrapped the
retaining wall around Lots 7-9 to route the water to the"stream". Calculations will be provided in final
site plan. After initial studies, it does not appear the piping of the stream will cause erosion to the
neighbor's yard.
18. The property line separating our site from both TMP 61 K-5-D-4 and 61 K-9-3B will have staggered rows
of evergreen trees, which will keep the feature out of sight.
19. A conservation plan will be provided with the final site plan along with requested notes on the
subdivision plat.
20. The affordable unit will be clearly listed on the final plat.
21. The open space areas B and C do not include the road, only past the ROW line that is indicated on the
plans. We will make it more clear what is included in the open space areas as well as determine the
responsible party for maintaining these areas.
22. We will seek approval of the vacation of the property line before final approval.
23. The setback note has been updated to reflect the new easement rules in the County Code on the cover
sheet.
24. We will obtain a grading/construction easement. However, the DI is existing.
25. The site plan number has been provided on sheet C1.
26. The undisturbed space has been corrected with the grass hatch.
27. Dimensions of proposed structures will be provided with the final site plan once more detailed
calculations are performed.
28. Building footprints have been depicted.
29. Retaining wall widths have been labeled.
30. We are still waiting for this info.
31. Comment noted.
32. Comment noted.
ENGINEERING
1. The stream has been verified to not be perennial.
2. The water is not exiting the 60"pipe at an erosive speed, because most of the water is being
detained and slowly released. Also, it is exiting the pipe where water is flowing currently.
3. Drainage easement has been provided for the detention pipe.
4. Drainage easements have been provided for the pipe conveying water from the adjacent property.
5. We will provide a profile of the detention pipe and a detailed plan view at a smaller scale.
6. Sanitary easements have been depicted.
According to VDOT Appendix B, Table 1, Footnote 9 we can reduce the width of the road by 2' based
on engineering judgment and VDOT approval. VD
road.
pp VDOT did not make a comment about the width of the
8. We will be submitting a variation request for sidewalk and planting strip on both sides of the road.
9. We have provided bumper blocks, but sidewalk remains 4 feet. Can we request an exception?
10. We will have to get another survey done for this information.
Page 2
11. We have to get another survey for this information, we will provide in the future.
12. According to AASHTO, the 20 mph design speed does not warrant a 200' radius. In the VDOT Road
Design Manual, appendix B it refers to the AASHTO green book.
13. The pavement striping indicates a No Parking area.
14. We have provided a sag curve at entrance to site, see road profile detail.
15. We will obtain an easement for the storm pipe.
16. The storm sewer has been adjusted to have inlets on both sides of the road.
17. There will not be any curbs in the parking area, we will be providing a type of permeable pavement
and therefore cannot provide a curb inlet. The DI-7 will catch the runoff that is not absorbed into the
ground.
18. We will not be impacting TMP-61K-10-A1. We have adjusted grading so that it does not pass the
property line.
19. The type of home is listed on sheet C1, under Proposed Use.
20. Grading has been revised. See grading plan.
Fire and Rescue
1. We have a striped area at the end of the parking area that is intended to be used as a turn-around
area.
2. We will provide fire flow test with final site plan.
E911
1. We will determine a road name before the final site plan is submitted.
ACSA
1. Comment noted.
2. The existing waterline and easement has been depicted
3. The existing and proposed utility sizes have been labeled.
4. We will determine fittings before the final site plan is submitted.
5. There is an existing fire hydrant at the entrance of the site, and there is less than 400' to the last unit.
6. We will provide this before final site plan submission.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me via e-mail at Morgan(c�shimp-engineerinq.com or
Justin Shimp at Justin@shimp-enqineerinq.com or by telephone at 434-227-5140.
Sincerely,
Morgan Bell
Page 3
Neer vie
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING
October 15, 2015
Ms. Shelly Plaster
Land Development Engineer
VDOT
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, VA 22701
Regarding: Inglewood Terrace-Initial Site Plan
SDP-2015-00020
Dear Ms. Plaster,
Thank you for your review of the final site plan for Inglewood Terrace. We have revised the
plans per comments dated June 2, 2015, and have provided the following detailed response.
1. We will provide a "For Review"sign on future plans.
2. We will provide references of previously approved waivers etc with final site plan.
3. Latitude and longitude of Inglewood Ct./Inglewood Dr. intersection has been labeled on the plan.
4. We have provided vertical datum on sheet C1. We are currently awaiting horizontal datum info from
the surveyor.
5. The road number for Inglewood Drive has been provided on the plans, and there are no posted
speed limit signs on Inglewood Drive or Inglewood Court.
6. The existing edge of pavement, signage and utilities have been labeled.
7. We have labeled the centerline radii for the new road.
8. The points of curvature and tangents have been labeled.
9. We have labeled the new and existing easements.
10. Centerline stationing has been added to the plan.
11. We have added a YIELD sign to the intersection of Inglewood Drive and Inglewood Court.
12. The owner has made arrangements to secure a private access easement at the entrance to the site,
in which half the ownership will be given to the adjacent neighbors to maintain.
13. We will provide a sight distance profile once we get a more detailed survey of the intersection of
Inglewood Court and Inglewood Dr.
14. We have provided additional detail to the intersection in the form of existing spot elevations, edge of
pavement and curb labeling.
15. The sidewalk meets minimum requirements up until it intersects with Inglewood Court because there
is no sidewalk to connect to
16. Standard details will be provided.
17. We have provided a typical roadway section on sheet C5.
18. The pavement section will meet/exceed typical section of Inglewood Drive.
19. MOT will be provided upon approval of initial site plan.
20. We will provide this information with final site plan.
21. We have added various signage to the plan.
22. We will submit an erosion and sediment control plan and stormwater management plan.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me via e-mail at Morganna,shimp-engineering.com or
Justin Shimp at Justin @shimp-engineering.com or by telephone at 434-227-5140.
Sincerely,
Aor6
Morgan Bell
Page j 2