Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201500134 Staff Report 2015-11-20ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB -2015-134: Sunset Overlook Initial Site Plan Review Type Initial Site Development Plan Parcel Identification 07600000005200 Location On the north/west side of Old Lynchburg Road, east of Sunset Avenue Extended, south of Country Green Road Zoned Residential (R4)/Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Forge Farm LLC/Collins Engineering (Scott Collins) Magisterial District Samuel Miller Proposal To construct 27 attached and 16 detached single family dwellings with associated site improvements. Context Most of the area surrounding the subject parcel is occupied by single family residences. Two churches are located just to the west of the site on Old Lynchburg Road. Much of the frontage along Old Lynchburg is wooded. The 5t' Street branch of the Albemarle County Offices and an apartment building complex are located a short distance to the east of the subject parcel. Visibility A cul-de-sac off of Sunset Avenue Extended with 15 detached residential units ends near Old Lynchburg Road. Residential units 9 and 10 located along Old Lynchburg Road will be visible, but through a wooded open space area with no proposed grading currently shown. The units located north of 9 and10 won't have clear views from the corridor but short, intermittent views will be available. The narrowness of Sunset Avenue Extended and wooded frontage along that road will limit visibility of the northern part of the new development from Old Lynchburg. Wooded area on adjacent sites will also help limit views into the development. ARB Meeting Date December 7, 2015 Staff Contact Ellie Ray PROJECT HISTORY The ARB reviewed a previous proposal for this site at the March 16, 2015 meeting. Though the layout of that proposal was slightly different with seven attached units backing up to the Entrance Corridor, the visibility of residential units was very similar. That review resulted in one requirement and nine recommendations. ANALYSIS Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial REF GUIDELINE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION Structure design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development Architectural designs have not been None. within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure submitted for review. Visibility of the that new development within the corridors reflects the overall development is expected to be traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the limited. Only two detached single purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that family units (Lots 9 & 10) adjacent to proposed development within the designated Entrance Rt. 631 are expected to have direct Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the visibility. The view will be into the side significant historical landmarks, buildings, and yards of the units, with existing structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, wooded area in open space a minimum and to promote orderly and attractive development 20' depth between the units and the within these corridors. Applicants should note that corridor. The architectural design of replication of historic structures is neither required nor single family detached residences is not desired. subject to ARB review. The attached 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the units are not expected to be visible Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these from the Entrance Corridor. sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within a development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. Compatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to Architectural designs have not been establish a pattern of compatible architectural submitted for review. The majority of characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in nearby buildings are single family order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs houses with traditional forms and should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby materials. structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be No accessory structures or equipment Preserve existing trees integrated into the overall plan of development and are shown on the plan. Standard within the proposed open shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the residential mechanical equipment and space along Rt. 631. building designs used on the site. similar items are expected to be located in the yards of the residential units. The Show mechanical 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate wooded area along the corridor, if equipment on the plan. siting, these features will still have a negative visual protected, should help limit views of Show how visibility of impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening these elements, but visibility may not the equipment will be should be provided to eliminate visibility. entirely be eliminated. eliminated. Include the a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. standard mechanical Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above- equipment note on the ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, site plan. razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of: a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." Lighting No lighting is proposed for the None. development. Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding New landscaping is not included in the Preserve existing trees landscaping are intended to reflect the landscaping initial plan submittal. Open space area within the proposed open characteristic of many of the area's significant historic is provided along the Rt. 631 frontage. space along Rt. 631. In sites which is characterized by large shade trees and It ranges in depth from 20' to 35'. areas where existing trees lawns. Landscaping should promote visual order within Preserving existing trees in the open are used to meet tree the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings space could help limit visibility of requirements along Rt. into the existing environment of the corridor. accessory structures and equipment, and could count towards frontage 631, identify existing individual large shade 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials planting requirements. To ensure that and ornamental trees on that share similar characteristics. Such common frontage planting requirements can be the plan by size and elements allow for more flexibility in the design of met, individual existing trees to remain species to show that the structures because common landscape features will help should be identified on the plan. No minimum requirement to harmonize the appearance of development as seen utilities are shown along Rt. 631. can be met. If the from the street upon which the Corridor is centered. requirement can't met, 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor show additional new streets should include the following: trees to be planted a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the meet the requiremenn t. Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 31/2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: An interior road leads to a cul-de-sac None at this time. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior ending with units 9 and 10. Glimpses roads. Such trees should be at least 212 inches caliper of the road may be visible from the Rt. (measured six inches above the ground) and should be 631 EC. It is anticipated that street of a plant species common to the area. Such trees trees will be provided along this road, should be located at least every 40 feet on center. but landscaping was not included with the initial plan submittal. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: Sidewalks are provided along the None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior interior streets where street trees are pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 21/2 inches anticipated. caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: No parking lots are proposed. None. a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 212 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: Residential units near the Entrance None. a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the Corridor are detached single family front of long buildings as necessary to soften the units. It is anticipated that trees in the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and open space and frontage planting type of such trees or vegetation should be determined requirements will sufficiently mitigate by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. the architectural design. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: Plant species aren't identified on the None at this time. a. Plant species required should be as approved by the plan at this time. Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). 38 Plant health: The note will be needed on the plan. Add the standard plant The following note should be added to the landscape health note to the plan. plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." Site Development and layout; Site grading 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing The shape of the site and the layout of Preserve existing trees natural landscape and should contribute to the creation the development limit the number of within the proposed open of an organized development plan. This may be units that will be visible from the EC. space along Rt. 631. accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the The units situated adjacent to the EC trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new are oriented parallel to it, though the Show the existing asphalt trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing sides of the units face the EC. The units path on the plans. species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that will be visible from the EC, and they any grading will blend into the surrounding topography will tend to block most views beyond thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to and into the rest of the development. the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. The development is inward oriented. None of the units have fronts facing the EC. The site is currently wooded and most of the trees will be removed to 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development construct the development as within the corridor should be as follows: illustrated. Two acres of existing a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike wooded area is shown as preserved, paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of though not the trees in the open space the site. along Rt. 631. Preserving these trees b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor will maintain a tie to the surrounding street should be parallel to the street. Building area and can help mitigate the layout groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance that results in no "fronts" facing the Corridor street. c. Provisions should be made for connections to road. Individual trees are not identified adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. within the wooded areas to remain or d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to Within the open space along Rt. 631. provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. The configuration of the open space, e. If significant natural features exist on the site shown on the east and west sides of the (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees property at the south end of the or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such development near the EC, suggests that natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If few significant trees in these areas, if the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle any, will actually be located on the County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements subject parcel. If the wooded area on required by that section should be located so as to the adjacent properties was to be maximize the use of existing features in screening such removed, greater views into the improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. inward -oriented development would f. The placement of structures on the site should respect become available. existing views and vistas on and around the site. A significant amount of grading is 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of proposed to accomplish the retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the development as illustrated. Some use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the retaining walls are proposed, but they existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally are not expected to be visible from the unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan EC. shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where Along the EC frontage of the parcel, they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should Rt. 631 rises east to west from an achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. elevation of 464' to 484'. The site also Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when rises up from the road, gaining 20' at necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the southeast corner. Consequently, the the landscape. residential units will appear to sit somewhat above the level of the road. There is an existing asphalt path along Rt. 631, but it is not shown on the plan. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur Two acres of existing wooded area is Preserve existing trees within the drip line of any trees or other existing shown as preserved, though not the within the proposed open features designated for preservation in the final trees in the open space along Rt. 631. space along Rt. 631. Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree These trees should be preserved to Provide a conservation protection fencing should be shown on, and minimize visibility. Individual trees are checklist on the plan. coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and not identified within the open space. Show tree protection erosion and sediment control plans. fencing on the plan. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should Three stormwater ponds are shown in None. be designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the development. None are expected to the need for screening. When visible from the be visible from the Rt. 631 EC. Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Anticipated visibility of the development from the EC. 2. Frontage treatment along the EC; existing wooded area to remain. Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4(2), (3) and (5): 1. Preserve existing trees within the proposed open space along Rt. 631. In areas where existing trees are used to meet tree requirements along Rt. 631, identify existing individual large shade and ornamental trees on the plan by size and species to show that the minimum requirement can be met. If the requirement can't be met, show additional new trees to be planted to meet the requirement. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding recommended conditions of initial plan approval: 1. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. 2. Show mechanical equipment on the plan. Show how visibility of the equipment will be eliminated. 3. Include the standard mechanical equipment note on the site plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 4. Preserve existing trees within the proposed open space along Rt. 631. In areas where existing trees are used to meet tree requirements along Rt. 631, identify existing individual large shade and ornamental trees on the plan by size and species to show that the minimum requirement can be met. If the requirement can't be met, show additional new trees to be planted to meet the requirement. Add the standard plant health note to the plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 5. Show the existing asphalt path on the plans. 6. Provide a conservation checklist on the plan. 7. Show tree protection fencing on the plan. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: 1. Provide a conservation checklist on the plan. Show tree protection fencing on the plan. 10 TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date/Revision Date 1 Site Plan 10/26/2015 2 Existing Conditions 10/26/2015 3 Site Plan, Utilities, & Grading 10/26/2015 4 Site Plan, Utilities, & Grading 10/26/2015 5 Stormwater Management Plan 10/26/2015 6 Notes & Details 10/26/2015