Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201300187 Application 2013-12-26 Albemarle Canty Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 a " Planning Application Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972 4126 (PARCEL/ OWNER INFORMATION TMPI 076M1-00-00-002A0 Owner(s): Application # ARB201300187 NEW ERA PROPERTIES LLC PROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description ACREAGE Magisterial Dist. Scottsville Land Use Primary Forest Current AFD Not in A/F District Current Zoning Primary Planned Development Shopping Center APPLICATION INFORMATION Street Address Entered By Application Type Architectural Review Board Judy Martin 112/26/2013 Project 'Fifth Street Station - Final Received Date 12/26/13 Received Date Final Submittal Date 12/26/13 Total Fees 1000 Closing File Date Submittal Date Final Total Paid 1000 Revision Number Comments Legal Ad SUB APPLICATION(s) •.::....,,.♦':r:5. ......:.....5`...�` 1.r,,;,, ai:. .y::. . hJ ub Ai IIcaU I Comment ..Jwawwaawi.dWaawaww:.: ..... ...... .. ............ ..... .... wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwdwwwwaawwwwwawwwWwwawJawwww ..... ....:..:.:::::::::1. ' aWJ:.J"J'wwdwJwJJwwJidwww :' :. 'APPLICANT/ CONTACT INFORMATION ContactType. Name Address I CityState I Zip, Phone t PhoneCell 0l ner/Applicant ,NEW ERA PROPERTIES LLC ;.P©.BOX 1467 ', €cHaRLOrTesvle�-po B Primary Contact DANIEL R. HINES, P.E. 28 LACK LL WE PARK LANE WARRENTON, VA 20186 5403494500 Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date Bignell Watkins !kisser ARCHITECTS P. C. TRANSMITTAL TO: Daniel Hines DATE: 12/12/2013 Bohler Engineering, P.C. 28 Blackwell Park Lane,Suite 201 TRANSMITTAL ID: 00001 Warrenton,VA 20186 703 709-9500 SENT VIA: Overnight FROM: Adeniyi Paul Bignell Watkins Nasser Architects, P.C. Annapolis, MD PROJECT: 13025.00_Wegmans Charltsvl PURPOSE: For your use SUBJECT: Materials Board-Charlottesville Wegmans DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS QTY DATED TITLE NOTES 1 — Materials Board-Charlottesville Wegmans REMARKS: COPIES: Caitlyn Piatkowski (Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.) Oki One Park Place,Suite 250 Annapolis,MD 21401 410.224.2727 1 8500 Leesburg Pike,Suite 503,Vienna,VA 703.288.3320 ww W.bigwaha.com r.. 1 if I Architectural Review Board Application ` ' Part A: Applicant, Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: Fifth Street Station 0076M1-00-00-002A0,0076M1-00-00-00280, Tax map and parcel(s): 0076M1-00-00-004A0 Physical Street Address: Contact Person: Daniel R. Hines, P.E. Business Name: Bohler Engineering Address 28 Blackwell Park Lane city Warrenton State VA zip 20186 Daytime Phone(540) 349-4500 Fax#(54 10 349-0321 E-mail dhines(a�bohlereng.com owner of Record: New Era Properties, LLC Address PO Box 1467 city Charlottesville State VA zip 22902 Daytime Phone(434)245-4932 Fax#(434) 245-4909 E-mail alan.taylor @redlightmanagement.com Part B: Review Type and Fee Select review type Review by the Architectural Review Board Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review(for a Special Use Permit or a Rezoning) No Fee Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee X Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1000.00 Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $225.00 Building Permit Review $590.00 County-wide Certificate of Appropriateness Structures 750' or more from the EC,no taller than 5 stories No Fee Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee Personal wireless service facilities No Fee Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee Building permits where the change is 50%or less of the altered elevation No Fee NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ARB# Fee Amount$ Op Date Paid 12,2 7 By who? Receipt# � qheck#L 6 7 By k117 6 6 L t L)4,. L—i■C■ County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development,401 McIntire Rd,Charlottl sville,VA 2 2 Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126 11/2010 Page 1 oft OVER—� r.r Nor Part C: Description of Proposal Describe your proposal.Attach a separate sheet if necessary. Sypit t Cen-F'c uSe u r (r-3c cfz p ik"5 infrasfi act re,. Pei Parkway ►S at 50 cjj7 E 7Ev serve VeU' orayot- (vlk' 11�)�J �l�t 7 '\ ✓l lit l; Part D: Applicant Agreement Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain(8)folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1)set of building material samples is required. All submittal items,including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without the appropriate checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate,true, and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by the appropriate checklist. S__ atu d of owner,owner's representative Data or contract purchaser 434-e hen -S. Qoti ■nS "1.10- LA - `boo Printed name,Title Daytime phone number of Signatory *Ownership Information: • If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal entity or organization including, but not limited to,the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has the authority to do so. • If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application. • If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. Attach the owner's written consent. 11/2010 Page 2 of 2 OVER--. v., •r .Il Architectural Review Board 8 Final Review of a Site Development Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist Part A: Applicant, Contact and Parcel Information Project Name: 5th Street Station 0076M1-00-00-002A0;0076M1-00-00-002B0; Tax map and parcel(s): 0076M1-00-00-004A0 Physical street address: Contact Person: Daniel R. Hines, P.E. Business Name: Bohler Engineering Address 28 Blackwell Park Lane City Warrenton state VA zip 20186 Daytime Phone 640)349-4500 Fax#(540) 349-0321 E-mail dhines @bohlereng.com Part B: Submittal Requirements Important:Submittal packages must contain 8 collated copies of all information unless otherwise indicated. A. Written description of the proposal "Provide a description of the proposal. Identify changes from the preliminary submittal. Indicate specifically how each ARB comment from the preliminary review has been addressed. If there are no changes proposed, then explain why. Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor. B. Site plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20', clearly legible and folded): IRr Location(s)of proposed building(s) on the site. [✓1 Location of proposed parking, travelways, walkways and other improvements. [Mechanical equipment, trash containers, loading and service areas, other similar features and Eprovements, and associated screening. xisting and proposed topography drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or less, and with sufficient off-site topography to describe prominent and pertinent off-site features and physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site. [✓Location and size of existing and proposed utilities and easements. Identify type of utility and extent of easement. t „ /I//A ❑ Stormwater management plan. A ser064e NParikh ha W.► 3u,s,v d 4 h eou.vrty /I/ I=1 Location of retaining walls indicating top and bottom elevations, maximum wall height, and propow taw; aterials, with material and color samples. We,mills *re, 1/10,4 fitioivi &Sty G y'/4efe' Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawing, date and description of the latest revision, and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings. For revised drawings, clearly identify revisions made. OVER—+ rage C. Landscape plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1'=20'or larger, clearly legible and folded): Proposed landscaping that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in the ARB guidelines. Existing landscaping to be removed. Include the location, size, and species. [Landscape key including all landscape symbols and a description of what they represent. [Location of existing and proposed tree lines and tree save areas. W Location of existing natural features. AO ❑ Location of individual trees of 6-inch caliper or greater and all significant groups of trees indicated by botanical name and caliper. Location and height of above-ground utilities and associated easements, and location of below- ground utilities and associated easements. ��.____JJ,��,. /V/A ❑ Stormwater facilities. A WPo �j tew,t M ►�WA fr t+ •�'�"'e [f Provide a signed, tree conservation checklist with all checklist items drawn on the landscape plans. j .c' , Include tree protection fencing and limits of work on the landscape, grading and E&S plans. D. Lighting plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20'or larger,clearly legible and folded): g-Location of all proposed building and site lighting. [Lighting schedule identifying all proposed light fixtures, poles and brackets. Manufacturer's cut sheets illustrating proposed lighting fixtures and information on illumination type, intensity, style, shielding, color, finish, and installation height. 44.40 [Photometric plan addressing all fixtures and indicating that lighting does meet the requirements of Section 4.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. [Coordination of lighting with landscaping and other site elements. E. Appearance of the building(s) (architectural elevations, color perspective sketches,site sections): Rif Dimensioned architectural elevations of the proposed building(s). Elevations must be drawn to the scale of 1/8"=1'-0". Include a building materials schedule and key on the elevation drawings. Submittal of elevations that are not visible from the Entrance Corridor may be required to clarify the overall building design. Color perspective sketches that show the proposed development as seen from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections that clarify proposed changes in topography and illustrate the visibility of the proposed development from the Entrance Corridor. Site sections shall indicate the finish floor eleva ion(s),_an!d roof height(s) relative to the natural elevations along the Entrance Corridor. Prt u of %� 3tdirAiitSik One set of all building materials/colors. dA floor plan adequate to show exterior walls, windows and doors. F. Additional material /✓/A ❑ Provide labeled, color, 8-'/" x 11" photographs of theb site a seen fr both directions on the Entrance Corridor. Pei f* .4 tut$40APPIP.p emiewSty StA r*. [ Any additional material that is necessary to address comments made by the ARB at the preliminary review with a memo itemizing how each of the preliminary comments have been addressed. A/A ❑ The applicant is welcome to submit any additional material that will make the final site development review more productive. Drawings or other submittal items that clarify topography, visibility, utilities, landscaping, or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome. 2 OVER-- '414e Now Part C: Applicant Agreement Applicant must read and sign • Each application package must contain (8) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted. Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files. • All information in this checklist is required, unless specifically waived by the ARB, prior to processing a final site development plan review by the ARB. Additional submittal materials may be required, depending on the proposal. • Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not complete without this checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials indicated on the checklist. In representing the above referenced firm submitting this application for review, I hereby state that the information provided in this application, and all accompanying information, is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by this checklist. OA ignature of rson completing checklist Date eriditS 4604/0/10,04011 /.J d 1 6f j 3` 1-�'S'oo Printed Name/Title Daytime phone number of Signatory County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (434)296-5832 Tel, (434) 972-4126 Fax www.albemarle.orq 3 OVER-- BOHLER ENGINEERING 28 Blackwell Park Lane, Suite 201,Warrenton, VA 20186 Professional Engineering Services Telephone: (540)349-4500 Fax: (540)349-0321 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL VIA: Hand Delivery TO: Albemarle County RE: Final Site Plan—ARB 1s` Submission 401 McIntire Road 5th Street Station Charlottesville,VA 22902 5th Street SW& Avon Street Ext. Charlottesville, VA 22902 (434)296-5832 Albemarle County ATTN: DATE: December 26, 2013 JOB NO: V122001 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑Shop drawings El Copy of letter Attached ❑ Prints ❑Change order COPIES JOB# DATE REVISION REVISION SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 V122001 12/26/13 Check#002127 Check in the amount of$1,000.00 made payable to Albemarle County 1 V122001 12/26/13 1-2 of 2 Architectural Review Board Application 1 V122001 12/26/13 1-3 of 3 Final Review of a Site Development Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist 1 V122001 12/26/13 1-6 of 6 Initial Site Plan Comment Response Letter 8 V122001 12/23/13 A-1 Building Floor Plan 1 V122001 12/2/13 1 of 1 Materials Board 7 V122001 12/2/13 1 of 1 Materials Board Print 8 V122001 12/13/13 1,5,6A-6G, Final Site Plan Sheets for ARB Review 7A-7G, 13A- 13J,15A-15G These Are Transmitted: ®For approval ❑For your use DAs requested ❑For review and comment ❑Approved as submitted ❑Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections REMARKS: Please find enclosed the Final Site Plan and corresponding documents for the above mentioned project in Charlottesville,VA.If you have any questions or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact this office at(540)349-4500. COPY TO: SIGNED: 641). • Charles E. owell,P.E. File • •,y 28 Blackwell Park Lane, Suite 201 Warrenton, VA 20186 BOHLER PHONE 540.349.4500 ENGINEERING FAX 540.349.0321 December 26, 2013 Via Hand Delivery County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 Attn: Margaret Maliszewski Re: ARB Final Site Plan 1St Submission SDP2013000012 5th Street Station 5th Street SW& Avon Street Ext. Charlottesville,VA 22902 Albemarle County BE# V122001 Dear Ms. Maliszewski: Bohler Engineering is pleased to submit on behalf of S.J. Collins, the Final Site Plan to construct a shopping center and associated parking on 65.64 acres for the 5th Street Station application in Albemarle County, VA. The following is our comment response letter addressing comments received from you dated April 19, 2013. This submission is the first site plan for the 5th Street Station site. This plan proposes the Wegmans store and its associated parking and infrastructure. Based on comments received during the Initial Site Plan review, and also changes associated with tenant discussions, there are several changes that were made from the Initial Site Plan to this Final Site Plan. Those items are noted below. 1. The area to the Southwest of the building has been revised to realign the drive aisle and eliminate the previously proposed retaining wall. No wall is proposed in this area. This also allows for a larger tree save area in this corner. 2. The berm and landscaping discussed during the work session with the ARB has been proposed with this plan. The fencing previously shown has been replaced with the evergreen vegetation as recommended by the ARB during the work session. 3. Minor adjustments to the parking lot area have been made. The responses below discuss how each comment has been addressed. Included for review are the building elevations for the Wegmans building, the Wegmans building footprint, and the proposed site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and lighting plan for the site. OTHER OFFICE LOCATIONS: •Southborough, MA •Albany, NY • Purchase, NY • Ronkonkoma, NY •Warren, NJ •Center Valley, PA 508.480.9900 518.438.9900 914.251.9800 631.738.1200 908.668.8300 610.709.9971 •Chalfont, PA •Towson, MD •Sterling, VA • Bowie, MD • Fort Lauderdale, FL 215.996.9100 410.821.7900 703.709.9500 301.809.4500 954.202.7000 CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PROJECT MANAGERS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS www.BohlerEngineering.com 2 B OH L E R`� ..� Margaret Maliszewski E N G I N E E R I N G 5`h Street Station Final Site Plan—ARB Submission 12/26/13 Page 2 of 6 Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per 30.6.4(2),(3) and (5): Comment 1: Revised the massing of the Wegman's and Major Tenant A buildings to reflect the traditional architecture of the area. Break up the mass into components whose scale reflects that of the traditional architecture of the area. Response 1: Building elevation for Wegmans has been included which shows the building massing broken up. In addition, the nature of the rear wall of the Wegmans which faces the entrance corridor has many dimensions and angles which further break up the wall face. Please see the submitted elevations and footprint. The area of Major Tenant A will be submitted with a future separate submission. Comment 2: Revise the Wegman's and Major Tenant A buildings to reduce the visual effect from the Entrance Corridors. Response 2: The Wegmans building and site area have been designed to reduce the visual effect from the Entrance Corridor. Significant berming and landscaping have been proposed to further reduce the visual effect. Comment 3: Revise the massing of Wegman's and Major Tenant A buildings to a scale that does not overpower the natural setting. Response 3: The Wegmans building and site area have been designed to not over power the natural setting. Significant berming and landscaping have been proposed to further reduce the visual effect. Comment 4: Eliminate the visual effect of the loading/service/refuse area from the Entrance Corridors. Response 4: The loading, service, and refuse areas are fully screened from the entrance corridor through the use of berms and evergreen landscaping. Sight sections (previously submitted) show that the service area behind Wegmans is not visible. Please see the site grading plan and landscape plan. Comment 5: Revised the interface between the site layout and the existing surrounding topography which is visible from the Entrance Corridors to better transitions between the proposed shopping terrace and the existing grades, using a combination of planting, material, terracing, and other strategies to more effectively correspond to the guidelines. Response 5: The nature of the building and parking lot requires the site to be significantly re-graded to meet County and Federal code requirements for safety and accessibility. To help reduce the visibility of the grading changes from the entrance corridor, berms have been proposed along the rear of the Wegmans building. Please see the site grading plan. Comment 6: Revise the plan to show consistent and adequate planting area free of utilities and easements along the I64 side of the site, to a width sufficient to mitigate visual impact from the Entrance Corridor. CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PROJECT MANAGERS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ``..,, PN ?1 Mar aret Maliszewski E R I N G 5th Street Station Final Site Plan—ARB Submission 12/26/13 Page 3 of 6 Response 6: Additional landscaping has been proposed along the berm area behind Wegmans. Utility easements are not proposed through this area. Comment 7: Provide planting area for trees along Bent Creek Parkway from Avon Street at least to the intersection of Bent Creek Parkway with the first turnoff for the Major Tenant A building, consistent with the approved landfill work plans. Response 7: Street trees have been proposed along Bent Creek Parkway as required. Regarding recommended conditions of initial site plan approval: Comment 1: Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. Response 1: Acknowledged. Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: Comment 1: Provide a conservation plan checklist. Show all the checklist items on the plan. Response 1: A conservation plan checklist has been provided with the landscaping sheets. The ARB also provided the following comments for future ARB submittals/reviews: Comment 1: Provide adequate visible representation such as site sections animations digital models of existing topography and proposed development to clarify the degree of visibility of the development from the Entrance Corridors, the visibility of the Major Tenant A loading areas from the EC, and to show how equipment, particularly rooftop equipment, will be made invisible from the Entrance Corridors. Consider flying balloons at proposed building corners to further clarify visibility. Response 1: Sight sections have been provided previously during the work session. Most of the plan elements presented have been included with this plan. The only change from what was presented during the worksession is the screening fence has been replaced with evergreen landscaping at the suggestion of the ARB. The loading area for Wegmans has been fully screened from the entrance corridor. Comment 2: Break down the massing of the Wegman's and Major Tenant A buildings with form, color and architectural detailing to reflect the traditional architecture of the area and to reflect human scale. Response 2: Building elevation for Wegmans has been included which shows the building massing broken up. In addition, the nature of the rear wall of the Wegmans which faces the entrance corridor has many dimensions and angles which further break up the wall face. Please see the submitted elevations and footprint. The area of Major Tenant A will be submitted with a future separate submission. CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PROJECT MANAGERS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS BOH LER� E N G I N E E R I N G Margaret Maliszewski 5th Street Station Final Site Plan—ARB Submission 12/26/13 Page 4 of 6 Comment 3: Reduce the amount of blank wall on the Entrance Corridor. Response 3: The rear wall of the Wegmans is variable with many dimensions, angles, and colors and materials. The Wegmans does not have a blank wall visible from the entrance corridor. Comment 4: Where visible from the Entrance Corridors, provide a tower design whose form, materials and color respect the traditions of local historic buildings. Response 4: Tower elements have been proposed at the rear corners of the Wegmans building as requested. Comment 5: Incorporate forms, features, materials and colors to make the Wegman's and Major Tenant A buildings compatible with the historic buildings in the area. Incorporate building relief. Response 5: Acknowledged. Comment 6: Revise trademark designs to meet the Entrance Corridor guidelines. Response 6: Acknowledged. Comment 7: Planting area on the I64 side of the site shall accommodate a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees sufficient to soften the appearance of the long elevations of the Wegman's and Major Tenant A buildings, to integrate the buildings into the Entrance Corridor, and to mitigate any visibility of loading, service and refuse areas that remains after appropriate siting. Response 7: Acknowledged. Landscaping has been proposed along the 1-64 as requested. Most of the existing trees are deciduous, therefore most of the proposed landscaping is evergreen to create a mix of vegetation. This vegetation along with the berming screen the loading and service areas. Comment 8: Design site and building lighting to minimize noticeability and impacts of the lighting. Response 8: Site and building lighting have been designed in accordance with the County regulations. The lighting adjacent to the entrance corridor is low and does not project over the property line. In addition the berm will provide additional screening to minimize the visual impact of the lighting. Comment 9: Provide the standard Entrance Corridor planting along Avon Street, consistent with the approved landfill work plan. Response 9: Street trees have been proposed along Avon Street and Bent Creek Parkway. Comment 10: Include parcel 77-11E on the cover sheet. Response 10: Parcel 77-11E has been added to the cover sheet. CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PROJECT MANAGERS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS B O H L E R E N G I N E E R I N G Margaret Maliszewski 5th Street Station Final Site Plan—ARB Submission 12/26/13 Page 5 of 6 Comment 11: Provide Bent Creek Parkway trees at a minimum of 2'/z" caliper 40' on center, consistent with the approved landfill work plan. Response 11: Street trees have been provided along Bent Creek Parkway. Comment 12: Provide medium trees along all interior pedestrian ways at a minimum of 2 1/2" caliper, spaced 25' on center. Response 12: Trees have been provided interior to the site. Comment 13: Provide perimeter parking lot trees at 40' on center. Response 13: Perimeter parking lot trees have been provided where possible. Comment 14: Maximize planting of trees on site. Minimize the impact of lighting perhaps by limiting the height of parking lot and roadway lighting to 20'. Response 14: Trees have been proposed throughout the site. Additional trees will be proposed with future site plans in the future development areas. The impact of lighting has been limited as much as possible. Comment 15: Terrace the wall at the Major Tenant A building into segments no more than 6' tall. Plant the terraces. Response 15: Currently no wall is proposed in the future development area. Comment 16: Provide retaining wall details for review. Identify materials and colors;provide samples. Response 16: Currently no retaining walls are visible from the entrance corridor. Comment 17: Round contours with a 10' minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Response 17: The proposed grading shall be rounded where it ties into the existing topography. Comment 18: Add the following notes to the plan: • All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant. • Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle. • Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. Response 18: The notes shall be added to the plans as requested. CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1BOHLER ENGINEERING Margaret Maliszewski 5th Street Station Final Site Plan—ARB Submission 12/26/13 Page 6 of 6 Should you have any questions regarding this project or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at(540)349-4500. Sincerely, Bohler Engineeri I g Charles. E. /swell, P.E. cc: Dan Tucker, S.J.Collins DRH/CEY/lb H:\12\V 122001\Permitting\.Jurisdictional Letters\ARB Initial Site Plan Review\131226 ARB Initial Site Plan Review CRL.doc CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PROJECT MANAGERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS