Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300067 Correspondence 2014-05-301 From:Christopher Perez Sent:Friday, May 30, 2014 1:35 PM To:'Scott Collins' Cc:Michelle Roberge Subject:SDP2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes site plan - final Attachments:CD4 Final Site Plan_Stonewater TH Comments 5-9-14.pdf; E4_sdp_Stonewater Townhomes - Final.pdf; ACSA 5-29-14.pdf Scott, This email is to consolidating all comments for SDP2013-67 Final Site Plan for Stonewater Townhomes from the most recent submittal of 5-2-14. Attached are my comments which I sent out on 5-9-14, attached are Engineering’s comments, and ACSA’s comments. These comments are also available in Countyview. I have not received VDOT approval of the final site plan yet, nor any comments for this latest round of review. I placed a call with Troy today for the status of his review. I think he may have been focused on writing his approval letter for the vacation plat and the final sub plat that he neglected to send me anything for the final site plan. Once I receive his comments or any correspondence on this item I will forward it to you. Thanks Christopher P. Perez | Senior Planner Department of Community Development |County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road | Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 6:20 PM To: 'Scott Collins' Cc: 'Kirk Hughes'; Michelle Roberge Subject: SDP2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes site plan - final SDP2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes site plan – final Scott, I have reviewed the final site plan noted above and it looks good. See the attached comment letter, which has been entered into Countyview, and is merely to document everything. Once I receive the other agencies approval/comments I will forward them to you. Let me know if you have any questions. Looks like we’re wrapping this one up. Christopher P. Perez | Senior Planner Department of Community Development |County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road | Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 1 From:Christopher Perez Sent:Friday, March 07, 2014 11:41 AM To:'Scott Collins' Subject:RE: SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan- Final Scott, Below in green I have responded to your questions. Hope this helps. Christopher P. Perez | Senior Planner Department of Community Development |County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road | Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:19 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan- Final Chris- Thanks for sending over these comments. We are planning to resubmit them today or Monday, but I have 2 quick questions. 1. Comment/Condition 8 – do you want us to provide parking sides on the west side of Treesdale Way and Stonehenge way indicating that parking is allowed on this side of the roadway YES, or should we show a no parking sign 18’ from the end of radius on Penfield lane, thus indicating that the rest of the road on that side is available for parking. Clearly no one will be parking on the east side with all the driveways there. Agreed This seems over the top and unnecessarily providing signage, but we will comply with whatever you feel needs to happen here. What I am looking for with the signage option is to provide parking signs on the west side of Treesdale Way and Stonehenge way indicating that parking is allowed on this side of the roadway. So essentially you’d have two signs on each roadway (one at the start of parking, and one at the end of parking for both Treesdale way and Stonehenge way). 2. Commment 16 – The fence will be a 4’ decorative board fence with brick columns, much like the fencing in the neighboring development along Rio Road (Dunloara Farms) which has the same conditions as this development (frontage on both sides of the roadway). This fencing, along with the extensive landscaping in this yard will hopefully suffice this condition, but can you confirm this for me. The height of the fence must be a minimum of 6’ tall to fulfill the screening requirement of the ordinance. Thus the fence as proposed (4’ tall) would not qualify as adequate screening on its own. If you revise the fence to be 6’ tall, then the screening requirements would be met. Alternatively, if you choose to leave the 4’ fence I’d be relying on qualifying landscaping to make up the difference to meet the requirement of Section 32.7.9.7. However, the landscaping as depicted along this corridor is not evergreen as required for screening purposes, rather its predominantly deciduous: * Deciduous shrubs: Clethra alnifolia, Fothergilla major, and Itea virginica. While yes, the trees in this area are required to be deciduous to meet the street tree requirements, I need the shrubs to be evergreen and a minimum of 18” 2 tall at the time of planting. Also, the planting strip depth is not 20’ deep, rather 5’ in most areas with some 10’ portions. I feel the landscape strip would need to be increased across the board to be a minimum of 10’ deep to meet the screening requirements with additional Ilex Gabra’s (Dwarf Buford Holly) being added to the mix. Thanks. Scott From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:41 PM To: Scott Collins Subject: SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan- Final Scott, Attached are the comments for SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan- Final. Christopher P. Perez | Senior Planner Department of Community Development |County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road | Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:40 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: Stonewater TH final site plan Chris- Great. Thank you. And congratulations as well! Scott From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:03 AM To: Scott Collins Subject: RE: Stonewater TH final site plan Scott, Sorry for the tardiness, I just got back from my last week of paternity leave and I’m catching up. I’m officially back back and hope to get this out to you today. Thanks Christopher P. Perez | Senior Planner Department of Community Development |County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road | Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 5:46 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: Stonewater TH final site plan 3 Chris- Any updates on this yet? Thanks. Scott From: Scott Collins Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:44 PM To: 'Christopher Perez' Subject: Stonewater TH final site plan Chris- Can you give me a status update on the review/approval of the final site plan for Stonewater TH. Are the plans ready for approval, pending the dedication of the r/w vacation plat? Thx. Scott 1 From:Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:55 AM To:Shawn Maddox Subject:SDP201300067 Stonewater Townhomes - Final site plan Attachments:im3512CurDev@albemarle.org_20140306_013041_1281_e3305e0100d4.pdf; im3512CurDev@albemarle.org_20140306_013008_1280_e3305e0000d4.pdf Shawn, As discussed on the phone earlier today. I’m just getting back into the office from paternity leave and am getting caught up on my reviews and comments from various reviewers. I wanted to follow up with you on your review of SDP201300067 Stonewater Townhomes – Final site plan, which you completed on 1-21-14. You had no objections. I wanted to assure we’re good on the right of way width for Stonehenge Way (private road). Its listed on the site plan as being FC/FC 28’. This road was previously approved with a road plan for Stonewater subdivision SUB2007-77…etc. However the applicant is now proposing intermediate parking on one side of this road. The spaces are each 9’ wide by 20’ long. Thus this would essentially only leave 19’ of clearance space for a fire truck to pass if a car was parked on this road. Are you aware of this? Incase you already threw the plan set away, attached is a scanned copy of the version you initially reviewed. Let me know what you think. Thanks Christopher P. Perez | Senior Planner Department of Community Development |County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road | Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Shawn Maddox Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:31 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: Planning Application Review for SDP201300067 Stonewater Townhomes - Final. The Review for the following application has been completed: Application Number = SDP201300067 Reviewer = Shawn Maddox Review Status = No Objection Completed Date = 01/21/2014 (200 ( 1ETT ST, SUITE K CHARLOTTESVILLE COLLINS .,o, 434.293 3719 PH 434.293.2813 FX www.collins-engineering.corn February 5,2014 Michelle Roberge, Megan,and Chris County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 RE: SDP-2013-55 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan Dear Michelle and Megan/Chris: Thank you for your correspondence dated November 21,2013 on the above-referenced project. The following are responses to the comments received. Engineering Comments 1. No traffic signal proposed at this time. We are wrapping up a signal warrant analysis now on the penfield/rio road intersection and will email it over to Engineering and VDOT once it is completed (later this week). 5. Existing location of underground electric line and related VEPCO easements shown on Sheets 2 and 3. The overhead line has been removed and currently is not an existing condition anymore. The plans have been updated. 8. The WPO plan is being resubmitted as coordinated with Engineering and CE. 9. CE is updating the road plans. As discussed with Planning,the road plans will need to be approved,prior to approval of the subdivision plat to divide the TH units. 1. Industry standard is to place sewer lines under the driveways, it's done most everywhere else,because it does not have issues with trees or other yard items. And, in this case,there is literally no where else the laterals can go. 2. The buildings have been adjusted and the sidewalks as well,giving more room to the drainage line. 3. Spot shots have been added,as requested. 4. The decks are above the driveways,and the measurements are for the decks. Below,the driveways extend from the sidewalk(and street)to the garage. All units have a minimum of 18' driveway. Planning Comments: 3. As discussed on February 6th,the road plans will be updated for the right of way vacation. The new road plans will need to be approved,prior to the subdivision plat dividing the TH units is approved. 5. Acknowledged. 6. Addressed,as discussed on February 6th 7. Addressed,as discussed on February 6th 8. Addressed,as discussed on February 6th. 9. The greenway trail will be tied into the existing sidewalk with the construction of the improvements for the TH units. 10. Treesdale and Rio Road Holdings,along with the contractor,are working out who will be building this remaining tie-in portion to the Greenway trail. 11. The labeling issue has been corrected. 12. All shrubbery calcs have been removed from the overall canopy calc. 13. VDOT is requiring the r/w to extend 2'beyond the back of sidewalk for maintenance. In addition, there is a 10'-15' sidewalk and maintenance easement over this area,which includes the 4' planting area. Therefore,this ensures that there is a 6'planting area for the street trees,giving us the ability to plant street trees in this area,outside of the site distance easement. 14. The labeling issue has been corrected. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Adam Long,P.E. Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:41 PM To: 'Scott Collins' Subject: SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan- Final Attachments: cd2 final ste plan for Stonewater TH comments 3-6-14.pdf Scott, Attached are the comments for SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan- Final. ( hriNtopher P. Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development IC ounty of Albemarle.Virginia 401 Mclntire Road I Charlottesville.VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott(acollins-engineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:40 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: Stonewater TH final site plan Chris- Great. Thank you. And congratulations as well! Scott From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org] Sent:Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:03 AM To:Scott Collins Subject: RE: Stonewater TH final site plan Scott, Sorry for the tardiness, I just got back from my last week of paternity leave and I'm catching up. I'm officially back back and hope to get this out to you today.Thanks ('itrktophet r.g`er€a° ;Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle.Virginia 401 Mclntire Road I Charlottesville.VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@ collins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 5:46 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: RE: Stonewater TH final site plan Chris- Any updates on this yet? Thanks. Scott 1 ‘40, From:Scott Collins Sent:Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:44 PM To: 'Christopher Perez' Subject:Stonewater TH final site plan Chris- Can you give me a status update on the review/approval of the final site plan for Stonewater TH. Are the plans ready for approval, pending the dedication of the r/w vacation plat? Thx. Scott 2 Nuie Nitre CA EAl IRGIP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 March 6,2014 Scott Collins,PE Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street,Suite K Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE: SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan-Final Dear Sir: Department of Community Development has reviewed the above referenced site plan(dated 2-10-14)against applicable codes and ordinances.Comments are provided below: Rev 2.Comment acknowledged by applicant and requests this takes place prior to approval of the subdivision plat dividing the TH units. The road plans will need to be revised to match the landscaping shown on the site plan. Nee' Nei 5. 132.5.2(a)]The Right of Way Vacation plat should be approved and recorded prior to the fmal site plan being approved.Once approved and recorded revise the final site plan to include DB Page#s for the recorded plat. Rev 2.Comment acknowledged by applicant. 8. [Condition of Approval,32.5.2(n)] On the plan four(4)required guest spaces along Treesdale Way and Stonehenge Way are depicted with dimensions; however,there are no parking signs or painting stripes to mark/designate the spaces/area for the spaces.On the plan provide the paint striping or parking signage to designate the parking area to the public.Revise.Rev 2.Comment not addressed. Rev 2.Per the applicant the greenway trail will be tied into the existing sidewalk with the construction of the improvements for the TH units. Rev 2.Per the applicant they are working with Treesdale to determine who will make the tie-in connection. 11. Rev 2. Comment acknowledged by applicant.Please be aware that the maintenance agreement for the sidewalk and the entire 6' planting strip will be required with the R/W vacation plat. 14. New Comments 15. [4.11.1] Decks may project not more than four(4)feet into any required yard;provided that no such feature shall be located closer than six (6) feet to any lot line. It appears that the decks associated with Block A project slightly more than 4' into the required front yard;specifically it appears they all encroach 4.5'into the front yard setback. This is half a foot over the permitted length or permissible encroachment. Reduce the decks in Block A so they do not encroach past 4' into the required front yard setback.To assure this is met; on the plan provide a note which states how much encroachment each deck is into the front yard setback. 16. [32.7.9.7(e)]Screening of Double Frontage Lots. The site proposes to install a fence along Rio Road East; however,the plan neglects to make note of the material type of the fence or the height of the fence.On the plan provide this information.For screening purposes the fence shall be a minimum of 6' tall. 17. [Comment] On sheet 3, at the top left of the page there is a"Note"which contains a typographical error which references 13 townhouse lots.To avoid confusion revise this note to provide the correct number of townhouse lots(14). 18. [Comment]On the plan the acreages for the townhouse lots do not seem to be coming out correctly?Namely the cover sheet and the landscaping sheet make note that the total acreage for the townhouse lots is 33,795 SF which is 0.78Acres.However, sheet 3 lists Block B as 16,466 SF and Block A as 20,070 SF which when combined comes out to a total of 36,536 SF which is.83 Acres.Please clarify this inconsistency as it affects the canopy requirements of the site.Revise. 19. 132.7.9.8(a)31 Tree Canopy. On the landscaping plan,sheet 5,the townhouse site attempts to utilize 10% canopy calculations;however,the site is a Residential Use of 10 dwelling units per acre or less(3.68 DUA). Thus the minimum tree canopy for this site is twenty(20)percent.Revise appropriately. 20. [Comment]On the landscaping plan,sheet 5,in the Plant Schedule,under Quantity of Plants,the quantity of plants does not match the actual number of plantings shown on the plan for(PA)Platanus Acerifolia,which is listed as quantity 4;however, 12 plantings were found.Revise appropriately. 21. [Comment] On the landscaping plan clearly depict the sight distance easements to assure that there is no conflict in proposed tree planting locations.This will also help to assure VDOT's 4th comment is adequately addressed. 22. [32.7.9.7(c)]Shrub height. Shrubs relied upon for screening purposes shall be a minimum of eighteen(18) inches in height when planted.On the landscaping plan,sheet 5,in the Plant Schedule,under Size of Plants, the size of the shrubs fronting Penfield Lane,IV-Itea Virginica_'Henrys Garnet',are all listed as 12"-18". However these shall be a minimum of 18"when planted.Revise plan to assure they are 18"at a minimum when planted. VDOT—Troy Austin - See attached comments. Engineering Comments—Michelle Roberge -See attached comments. Nee ACSA—Alex Morrison -See attached comments. Please contact Christopher P. Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez @albemarle.org or 434-296- 5832 ext. 3443 for further information or if you have questions. r.r" "F i " COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper,Vrgoa 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner February 26,2014 Mr. Christopher Perez Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes-- Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Perez: We have reviewed the Final Site Plan for the Stonewater Townhomes dated 10x'7-`13 with revisions dated 10`11'13, 1230'13, 1'29='14, and 2/10'14 and offer the following comments: 1. The street trees shown along Penfield Lane and Rio Road need to be located at least 30' from the end of radius at each intersection as shown in Appendix B(1)of the Road Design Manual so that intersection sight distance is not impacted. 2. With the proposed reduction in right-of-way along Penfield Lane, additional drainage easement is necessary to provide coverage for the storm sewer, including the drop inlets, i.e., STR-S18. 3. Verification from our Traffic section that the proposed right-of-way at the intersection of Penfield Lane and Rio Road is adequate to accommodate the potential traffic signal for the Rio Road and Penfield Lane intersection is pending. 4. Easement and a maintenance agreement need to be provided for the sidewalk along Penfield Lane. If you need additional information concerning this project,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, //1/ *IX Troy Austin, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Culpeper District WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Noe AL4,, >rC1N‘' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 Project: Stonewater Townhomes-Final Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [434-293-3719] Owner or rep.: Marvin&Carolyn Spencer Plan received date: 11 Feb 2013 Date of comments: 28 Feb 2013 Reviewer: Michelle Roberge Engineering has completed the review of application SDP201300067.Please see the following comments. I have also included my comments from the initial site plan SDP201300055. A. Site Development Plan—Initial Site Plan (SDP201300055) 1) Verify with VDOT if warrants are met to design and install the signal at Rio Rd and Penn Park Lane to satisfy Treesdale Park proffer. [Initial Site Plan] Comment not addressed.It does not appear that the proposed townhomes will require a signal at Rio Rd and Penn Park,but provide a signal warrant analysis per VDOT comments. [Final Site Plan] The traffic signal warrant analysis was provided.Due to the existing sight distance on Rio Rd E at the crest vertical curve,providing a signal will be much safer for the residents. Further discussion with VDOT is necessary to discuss the safety concerns at the intersection. 4) Please note that a subdivision plat is required to subdivide the lots as shown on plan. The approved plat from SUB2007-77 shows this area as Block A and Block B only. [Final Site Plan] Comment acknowledged by applicant.As discussed with Planning,the road plans will need to be approved prior to the approval of the subdivision plat. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 9) If applicable,revise Road Plan. [Initial Site Plan] It appears that a portion of the Penfield Lane R/W is being reduced.If this is approved,road plans need to reflect this change.Also,landscaping and other road plan items revised on this final site plan will need to be reflected on a road plan. [Final Site Plan] Comment acknowledged by applicant.As discussed with Planning,the road plans will need to be approved prior to the approval of the subdivision plat. B. Site Development Plan—Final Site Plan (SDP201300067) 1) The proposed sanitary sewer line is underneath all driveways. I recommend not placing it under driveways.Please address. • Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 [Final Site Plan] Comment addressed.I discussed with ACSA.Waterline easements on both Stonehenge Way and Rio Road are causing space constraints for sanitary sewer lines.The only suitable location for sanitary sewer is underneath the driveways. 2) It does not appear that you have adequate space for the roof drain easements.Please address. [Final Site Plan] Comment addressed. 3) It appears that runoff is draining towards lot 43 &44.Please drain away from bldg or capture runoff. I recommend placing spot elevations where patio landing meets sidewalk for lots 43- 48. [Final Site Plan] Comment addressed. 4) Deck dimensions are shown. Is this directly above the patio shown. Clarify dimensions since patio dimensions do not match. [Final Site Plan] Comment addressed. Sincerely, ,or 9 Y t Michelle Roberge Nwer Christopher Perez From: Alex Morrison [amorrison @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 9:49 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: SDP201367: Stonewater Townhomes- Final Site Plan Chris, The construction drawing are currently under review by Jeremy Lynn. I will advise once approval is granted. Alexander J. Morrison,EIT Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22911 (0)434-977-4511 Ext. 116 (F)434-979-0698 1 Nei, *Ile Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 1:47 PM To: 'Scott Collins' Subject: RE: Stonewater Scott, I conferred with intake and they show that only 3 copies of the final site plan were submitted on 12-30-13 to the County (2 full sized copies and 1 reduced copy). I called ACSA, Building Inspection, E911 and neither of these agencies has a copy of the plans. I would call VDOT to check on the plans but Troy is out till the 2nd I just got a call from intake showing a submittal of 6 more copies today. Thanks for the quick work, this will be sufficient for my distribution of the plans. Thanks Christopher P.Perez J Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road i Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott©collins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 1:42 PM To: Christopher Perez Subject: Stonewater Chris- More plans have been delivered to the County. Thanks. Scott 1 • Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:08 PM To: 'Scott Collins'; 'Kirk Hughes' Cc: 'Lori Schweller' Subject: STONEWATER_SDP-2013-67, SDP-2014-47,SUB2014-49, SUB2013-181 Attachments: CD3 Final Site Plan Stonewater TH Comments 3-26-14.pdf; CD3 3-24-14 SUB2013-181.pdf; CD1 STONEWATER Revised road plan_Comments 3-26-14.pdf; CD1 3-26-14 SUB2014-49 Stonewater Final Plat.pdf Scott, SDP-2013-67 Stonewater Townhomes Site Plan-Final - Comments are attached, titled: "CD3 Final Site Plan Stonewater TH Comments 3-26-14". These comments are also provided in Countyview. SUB-2014-47 Stonewater—Revised Road Plans - Comments are attached,titled: "CD1 STONEWATER Revised road plan" . These comments are also provided in Countyview. Kirk, SUB2014-49 Stonewater- Final Plat - Comments are attached, titled: "CD1-3-26-14 SUt32014-49 Stonewater Final Plat... These comments are also provided in Countyview. Kirk/Lori, SUB2013-181 Stonewater Right of Way Vacation Plat - Comments are attached, titled: "CD3-3-24-14 SUB2013-181". These original comments are also provided in Countyview. * Based on the review of the townhomes' final site plan (SDP2013-67) which commenced today, staff has an additional comment(Comment#23 —see below) which can either be addressed on SUB2013-181 OR SUB2014-49 Final Subdivision Plat, OR on another plat unrelated to the two mentioned. Regardless this comment must be addressed prior to the the townhomes' final site plan approval. I'm CCing you to start the conversation with Scott on how it shall be resolved. It appears that Lori Schweller's March 25th email w/her attached DRAFT/unrecorded `Second Amendment to Stonewater Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions and Easements' will adequately cover the maintenance agreement portion of my comment,pending County Attorney approval of the document; however, now we need to assure the required Landscape Easements subject of my Comment#23 are depicted on one of the two plats mentioned above (SUB2013-181 OR SUB2014-49) and set to record w/Lori's `Second Amendment to Stonewater cov and restric'...prior to the final site plan is approved. "SDP2013-67 Comment#23) [32.7.9.9(d), 32.5.2(n), 32.7.9.7(e)] Installation and Maintenance of Required Landscaping and Screening. For the required screening along Rio Road and Penfield Lane provide the dimensions of the landscape easements that these plantings are to be located in and label them on the plan. Also, prior to final site plan approval the easements shall be set to record with a maintenance agreement approved by 1 the County Attorney. Prior to"`f`inal site plan approval on the plan provIgnethe Deed Book and Page reference number of these recorded easements. Staff suggests the applicant depict these easements on the Right of Way Vacation plat (SUB2013-181) or the final subdivision plat(SUB201400049). Also assure to provide a maintenance agreement for the County Attorney to review OR assure that the previous Covenants and Restrictions document covers the additional landscaping easements and then set that plat and legal document to record " lirist cipher P. PM?? Senior Planner Department of Community Development!County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road!Charlottesville.VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 2 NOW hristopher Perez From: Scott Collins [scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 3:48 PM To: Christopher Perez; Kirk Hughes Cc: Troy Austin Subject: RE: Rio Road/Penfield Lane Potential Signal Chris- Thanks. We are submitting today(6) copies of the final site plan. These plans include the following changes: 1. the VDOT modifications as approved for the intersection (future stoplight requirements) including modifications to the curbing, sidewalk,and VDOT r/w. 2. Updates to the landscaping per comments 25-27) 3. We have added/shown the maintenance and greenway easement as depicted on Kirk's plat. 4. We have added a landscaping, access, and maintenance easement over the TH lots as shown on sheet 3 and 5 to accommodate the plantings and sidewalks. I believe that this addresses all of the VDOT and planning comments. ACSA is waiting for the deed of dedication to be completed to give their approval of the construction plans and we can not complete the deed of dedication until the r/w vacation plat is recorded. Once the r/w vacation plat is recorded,the deed of dedication will be recorded and ACSA will issue their approval. We can also fill in the deed book and page numbers on the final plans and get plans down for the county to sign for approval. Kirk will need to add the access, landscaping, and maintenance easement to his final TH subdivision plat. Thx. Scott From:Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez @albemarle.org] Sent:Wednesday,April 30, 2014 5:01 PM To: Kirk Hughes;Scott Collins Cc:Troy Austin Subject: RE: Rio Road/Penfield Lane Potential Signal Kirk and Scott, I've contacted VDOT on how they wish to handle their review of the revised documents to address their final comment on the right of way which were dated 4-29-14.To facilitate his review Troy has requested that you submit hard copies of all three documents for verification purposes to assure they match up and fully address his comment: (SUB2013-181 Stonewater—final right of way plat), (SUB201400049 Stonewater townhome—final sub plat), (SDP2013-67-Stonewater Townhome Final Site Plan). *The two subdivision plats mentioned above appear to only need VDOT approval left prior to moving forward, thus 2 copies of each will suffice. *The site plan mentioned above appears to have more reviewers without approvals than just VDOT.Scott, if you are not ready to fully submit the revised site plan for everyone's review can you make the required changed to the site plan so VDOT can use it to verify/match up the changes, thus allowing Troy to make a finding as to whether the 4-29-14 comment is addressed. Depending on how you choose to handle this, if the site plan submitted is only being modified to address VDOT comments, I'll only need 2 copies of the revised site plan. If you choose to address all remaining comments, please submit the full amount. Senior Planner 1 Christopher Perez From: Scott Collins [scott@collins-engineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:56 PM To: Glenn Brooks; Christopher Perez Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Stewart Wright Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Glenn- I have some information on this issue that may help. On June 3rd,Troy issued his approval letter on the Stonewater TH site plan, indicating that the TH site plan does not warrant a traffic light. Therefore,the issue below should not hold up the approval of the site plan for the Stonewater TH units. As everyone knows,there is a requirement through the Treesdale/Stonewater agreements that a traffic signal shall be installed, if warrented. From my understanding, Ramey Kemp is looking at the crash data issue and any other issues to see if the traffic signal is warranted yet, because it's not warranted by traffic volumes at this time. Because the trip volumes from the development do not create a warrant for the stoplight,this should be viewed as a separate issue from the site plan of the TH units, and should be resolved separately and not hold up the approval of the site plan for the TH units. In addition, I believe that similar warrant analysis are due during certain build-out periods of Lochlyn Hill. This intersection will get a lot more analysis over the next couple of years as well. Thanks. Scott Collins From:Glenn Brooks Finailto:GBROOKS @albemarle.org] Sent:Wednesday,July 16,2014 4:43 PM To:Christopher Perez;Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter;Stewart Wright Subject: RE:Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Chris, what happened to Troy's email about waiting on traffic data, etc. See attached. From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday,July 15, 2014 4:49 PM To: Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Glenn Brooks; Stewart Wright Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Scott, As of 4:45pm on 7-15-14 the status has not changed, I have all signatures on the final site plan except Engineering's. I sent Glenn Brooks a reminder email on 7-3-14 that the plan is ready for signatures. Being Michelle reviewed it and she is not in the office for the foreseeable future he wants to check to assure everything has been addressed before he signs it. By CC of this email I'm providing him your concerns. Once I receive his signature on the final site plan, then I can sign it. Then it'll be approved. Chri,topher P.Perez!Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle.Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 1 +434.2965832 ext.3443 v""''` •ftso Scott Collins [mailto:scott(acollins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:58 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Chris- Can you give me a status update on the signatures on the Stonewater Final site plan. From our conversation last Monday, I believe that Engineering was the last remaining agency that needed to sign the plans. It's been a week now, and from the emails that I am receiving from the builders, it does not appear that the final site plans are signed yet. Can you do me a favor and see what you can do to help release them. The builders are very anxious to get their building permits. Thank you Chris! Scott Collins From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez @albemarle.org] Sent:Tuesday,July 01, 2014 11:19 AM To:Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes Subject:Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Scott, Status update on Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067). The plan is ready for approval by SRC members. I have 4 copies in my office for signature and am awaiting all SRC reviewers to sign these plans. Once signed I'll let you know so you can pick up the plans. Thanks Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle.Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 2 r �f Noise Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 5:29 PM To: Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Stewart Wright; Troy Austin; Glenn Brooks Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Scott, The final site plan has been approved and is ready for pickup downstairs in Community Development Office. Thanks C.'hristophe: P.Perez(Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle.Virginia 401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville.VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Glenn Brooks Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 5:07 PM To: Christopher Perez; Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Stewart Wright; Troy Austin Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) OK. I signed. From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 5:02 PM To: Glenn Brooks; Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Stewart Wright; Troy Austin Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Glenn, Troy mentioned he was waiting on traffic data but I never received the traffic data from hinip,ln that email Troy said it was not required for his approval. He made note that he could approve the site plan in that tail.To assure that he was approving the site plan with that email I requested he confirm it, he did with a "yes" in the following email. The final site plan which is downstairs has already been signed by Troy. Michelle signified that the final site plan was approvable with her last comment"no objections" provided the road plan was approved by VDOT and Planning.As such the road plan has been approved, along with the final sub plat. Christopher P. Perez j Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 Mclntire Road I Charlottesville.VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Glenn Brooks Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:43 PM To: Christopher Perez; Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Stewart Wright Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Now, Now Chris, what happened to Troy's email about waiting on traffic data,etc. See attached. From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday,July 15, 2014 4:49 PM To: Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter; Glenn Brooks; Stewart Wright Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Scott, As of 4:45pm on 7-15-14 the status has not changed, I have all signatures on the final site plan except Engineering's. I sent Glenn Brooks a reminder email on 7-3-14 that the plan is ready for signatures. Being Michelle reviewed it and she is not in the office for the foreseeable future he wants to check to assure everything has been addressed before he signs it. By CC of this email I'm providing him your concerns. Once I receive his signature on the final site plan, then I can sign it. Then it'll be approved. ;'hri`ioulaer V.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@ collins-engineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:58 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Kirk Hughes; Charlotte Harper; Drew C. Holzwarth; Bill Ledbetter Subject: RE: Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Chris- Can you give me a status update on the signatures on the Stonewater Final site plan. From our conversation last Monday, I believe that Engineering was the last remaining agency that needed to sign the plans. It's been a week now, and from the emails that I am receiving from the builders, it does not appear that the final site plans are signed yet. Can you do me a favor and see what you can do to help release them. The builders are very anxious to get their building permits. Thank you Chris! Scott Collins From:Christopher Perez Imailto:cperezftalbemarle.org] Sent:Tuesday,July 01, 2014 11:19 AM To:Scott Collins Cc: Kirk Hughes Subject:Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067) Scott, Status update on Stonewater's townhome Final site plan (SDP-2013-00067). The plan is ready for approval by SRC members. I have 4 copies in my office for signature and am awaiting all 2 SRC reviewers to sign these Mans. Once signed I'll let you knoww o you can pick up the plans. Thanks Christopher P. Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville.VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 3