HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201500098 Correspondence 2015-07-08 Christopher Perez
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC <richard @piedmontlandsurveyors.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:02 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: RE: SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Attachments: 7108 Secretary Sands Road, Albemarle, VA.- Plat Model (3).pdf
Christopher,
Would you mind taking a quick look at the attached plat?
All comments have beed addressed.
Just a few things though....
• ent(14-303C) TM 119-56 appeared to be along the northern boundary of 119-22. AL,4 ct l ; .e A-S
Comment (14-303D) I didn't use "hooks" but added annotation to help clarify the acreage going to 119-22.
Let me know if this looks okay to you.
Thanks
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:06:50 +0000, Christopher Perez<cperez @albemarle.org>wrote:
Richard,
If the owner is amendable to allocate a second development right that is fine,just assure that the development
right note is in the form provided below:
Original comment from June 19th :
"Parcel 224 Tax Map 119 is assigned I development right from Prrrel 22 and may not be
further divided. Parcel 22, Tat Map 119 is retaining 4 development rights am!may befirther be further
dzv,ded -
otential revised note from July 8th email conversations:
- "Parcel 22A Tax map 119 is assigned 2 development right from Parcel 22 and may be further divided. Parcel
22 Tax Map 119 is retaining 3 development rights and may be further divided "
Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner
1
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:07 AM
To: 'Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC'
Cc: Amanda Burbage; Francis MacCall
Subject: RE: SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Richard,
If the owner is amendable to allocate a second development right that is fine,just assure that the development
right note is in the form provided below:
Original comment from June 19th :
'Parce122 A Tax Map 119 is assigned I development right from Parcel 22 and may not be
further divided Parcel 22 Tax Map 119 is laming 4 development rights and ma•be fuather
divided."
Potential revised note from July 8th email conversations:
"Parcel 22A Tax map 119 is assigned 2 development right from Parcel 22 and may be further divided. Parcel
22 Tax Map 119 is retaining 3 development rights and may be further divided. "
Christopher P. Perez(Senior Planner
Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle.Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville. VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC [mailto:richard @piedmontlandsurveyors.com]
Sent:Wednesday,July 08, 2015 9:57 AM
To:Christopher Perez
Cc:Amanda Burbage; Francis MacCall
Subject: RE:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
I will just change the wording on the plat to reflect the additional developmental right.
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:44:07 +0000, Christopher Perez<cperez(a�albemarle.org>wrote:
Richard,
I had coordinated this review w/Francis before he left for vacation. He is currently out of the office and will
not return for 2 weeks.
Regardless, to allocate a second development right for the 10 acre lot would not lay in the hands County staff
but rather the two parties involved in the BLA.
Hope this helps.
1
�✓ -4,0i
Chrictoi>her P. Perez Senior Planner
Department of Community Development!County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road j Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC [mailto:richard @piedmontlandsurvevors.corn]
Sent:Wednesday,July 08, 2015 9:37 AM
To:Cristal Sowder; csowder@cha.idc.virginia.gov; Christopher Perez; Francis MacCall
Cc:Cason,Jackson; Britt.Kelly @clavtonhomes.com;tomhogge @hotmail.com;Amanda Burbage
Subject: Re:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Mr. Perez,
I received my information regarding the developmental rights from Francis MacCall. If you would not mind
coordinating with him, I would change the verbiage on the plat to reflect Ms Sowder receive the additional
developmental right.
Thanks
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:23:11 +0000, Christopher Perez<cperez @albemarle.org>wrote:
Cristal,
SUB2015-98 Ruddock-BLA
In the attached comment letter, comment#1, I explained why the existing development right on TMP 11900-
00-00-022A0 (the property you are purchasing) is unusable and thus your lot has to utilize a development right
from Ms. Ruddock's TMP 11900-00-00-02200 in order to move forward. This leaves her 4 development
rights and gives you 1 development right. That is what is being proposed now and is permitted.
In Albemarle County each lot in the Rural Areas zoning district below 21 acres requires a minimum of 1
development right to exist. If you wanted the opportunity to further subdivide the 10 acre parcel you are
purchasing, then you'd need to have a minimum of 2 development rights allocated to your property. This
could be done, but Ms. Ruddock would have to be willing to relinquish you a second development right for
your future subdivision plans. Currently that is not what is depicted on the plat which I reviewed; rather, Ms.
Ruddock is only offering you 1 development right to create your 10 acre parcel. This single development right
2
Noe
, allows you to create a lot under 21 acres and build a house on it.
It seems like you may want to discuss your questions with Ms. Ruddock or the surveyor to assure you get the
2 development rights you both had previously agreed on, which would drop her dev right total to 3. If you
have any other questions give me a call or send me another email.
PS. Something seems to be wrong with your email, as various versions of your email message are being sent
to me over and over, see below the record of each email being sent. You may want to look into this.
Christopher P.Perez. Senior Planner
Department of Community Development!County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road!Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Cristal Sowder[ € r
Sent: Wednesday,July 08,2015 8:45 AM
To: Christopher Perez
Cc:richard @,piedmontlandsurveyors.com;Cason,Jackson;Britt.Kelly @claytonhomes.com;tomhogge @hotmail.com;Amanda
Burbage
Subject: 7108 Secretarys Sand Road Land Division
3
Mr.Perez,I got your name from Amanda Burbage. She says you are the main contact for the above. I am wondering why I am
NOT getting a future subdivision right with my 10 acres. In the beginning,I was told that I would receive one,but that Ms.
Ruddock,the seller would lose one of her rights. That would leave Ms.Ruddock with 3 future division rights on her remaining
property,and one future division right for me on my 10 acres. Is this not possible? Please advise ASAP. Thanks.
Cristal Sowder
Office Manager
403 E.Market Street
Charlottesville,VA 22902
(434)951-6300 ext. 110
Original Message
From Cristal Sowder[ �,a ����„
Sent: Wednesday,July 08,2015 8:43 AM
To:Christopher Perez
Cc:Amanda Burbage;richardn aa,piedmontlandsurveyors.com;Britt.Kellyc ClaytonHomes.com;tomhogge @hotmail.com;
Jackson.C ason(a,C I aytonHom e s.c om
Subject: 7108 Secretarys Sand Road Land Division
Mr.Perez,I got your name from Amanda Burbage. She says you are the main contact for the above. I am wondering why I am
NOT getting a future subdivision right with my 10 acres. In the beginning,I was told that I would receive one,but that Ms.
Ruddock,the seller would lose one of her rights. That would leave Ms.Ruddock with 3 future division rights on her remaining
property,and one future division right for me on my 10 acres. Is this not possible? Please advise ASAP. Thanks.
4
•
Cristal Noe
•
Original Message
Y
From Cristal Sowder[s�-a�3e• .�Q ��a ss'
Sent: Wednesday,July 08,2015 8:39 AM
To: Christopher Perez
Cc:Amanda Burbage;richard@piedmontlandsurveyors.com;Britt.Kelly @ClaytonHomes.com;
Jackson.Cason@ClaytonHomes.com
Subject: 7108 Secretarys Sand Road Land Division
Mr.Perez I got your name from Amanda Burbage. She says you are the main contact for the above. I met with Mr.Burke yesterday
and am wondering why I will NOT receive a future subdivision right with the 10 acres I am purchasing? In the beginning,it was
told to me that I would receive a subdivision right with the 10 acres,but,the seller,Mr.Ruddock,would lose one. That meaning
Ms.Ruddock would retain 3 division rights on the remaining of her property and I would receive one on the 10 acres that I am
purchasing. Is this not possible? Please advise ASAP. Thanks.
Cristal
Original Message
From Cristal Sowder[ y34
Sent: Wednesday,July 08,2015 8:26 AM
To: Christopher Perez
Cc:richard @piedmontlandsurveyors.corn
Subject: 7108 Secretarys Sand Road Land Division
Mr.Perez,I was given your contact information by Amanda Burbage. She said you are the direct contact for the above matter. I
met with Mr.Burke yesterday and I am wondering why I do NOT get a subdivision right for future use on my ten acres? When I
first started this process,I was under the understanding that I could get a subdivision right,but the seller,Ms.Ruddock,would lose
one in place of my receiving one. Is this not possible? Please advise.
Cristal
5
N
Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC
Richard Burke LS
P.O. Box 250
Rixeyville, VA 22737
Ph: 540-222-5037
www.piedmontlandsurveyors.com
Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC
Richard Burke LS
P.O. Box 250
Rixeyville, VA 22737
Ph: 540-222-5037
www.piedmontlandsurveyors.com
6
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 8:09 AM
To: 'Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC'
Subject: RE: SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Attachments: Portion of TMP 119-56 DB 3838-354.pdf
Richard,
I decided to do a little more digging into the various non-continuous parcels of TMP 119-56 and found the
attached plat by Roger Ray 2009 (DB 3838-354). In this plat Roger depicts the parcel I've been talking about as
"Parcel W". Please take a look at this plat.
I called Roger Ray's office about the plat and they said if any other surveyor had questions about any of their
plats they could help provide guidance (434-293-3195). Just a suggestion.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From:Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday,July 10, 2015 7:23 AM
To: 'Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC'
Subject: RE:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Richard,
In an attempt to get us both on the same page, I have provided the attached document in which I wrote on the
GIS print out to signify the section of TMP 119-56 that I'm referring to in all my communications.
As previously discussed the GIS depicts numerous non-contagious portions of TMP 119-56,the portion you
sent me via GIS was the northern portion; however,there are more portions of TMP 119-56 than just that piece,
each is depicted on the GIS and on the Roger Ray plat. See the attached document which I wrote on to call these
items out.
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC [inailto:richard @piedmontlandsurvevors.com]
Sent:Thursday,July 09,2015 4:39 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: RE:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Thanks for the reply.
Im a little confused though.
How is GIS wrong?
1
to
ftrif
• Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 7:23 AM
To: 'Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC'
Subject: RE: SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Attachments: GIS and Roger Ray Plat.pdf
Richard,
In an attempt to get us both on the same page, I have provided the attached document in which I wrote on the
GIS print out to signify the section of TMP 119-56 that I'm referring to in all my communications.
As previously discussed the GIS depicts numerous non-contagious portions of TMP 119-56,the portion you
sent me via GIS was the northern portion; however,there are more portions of TMP 119-56 than just that piece,
each is depicted on the GIS and on the Roger Ray plat. See the attached document which I wrote on to call these
items out.
Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development!County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC [mailto:richard @piedmontlandsurveyors.com]
Sent:Thursday,July 09, 2015 4:39 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: RE:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Thanks for the reply.
Im a little confused though. l
How is GIS wrong?
Please tell me
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:14:13 +0000, Christopher Perez<cperez(&,albemarle.org>wrote:
Richard, See below my comments in red.
(:tirisropher P.Perez Senior Planner
Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902
1
vire
434.296.5832 ext.3443 ...#1,
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC[mailto:richard Ca�piedmontlandsurvevors.com]
Sent:Thursday,July 09, 2015 4:05 PM
To:Christopher Perez
Subject: Re:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Did you get my email I sent yesterday. Yes I did.
I appreciate you responding so quickly but I'd like to get an answer by tomorrow.
The GIS depicts numerous non contagious portions of TMP 119-56,the portion you sent me via GIS was the
northern portion, and that was also shown on the Roger Ray plat from 2008; however, there is more portions of
119-56 than just that piece which are both depicted on the GIS and on the Roger Ray plat. If you had more
substantial proof; such as other recorded plats which showed that the GIS was incorrect,then we could try and
get this cjearej up in the Real Estate office before moving forward with this BLA. Without such information
I'd suggest you request an official Parcel Determination (this is not the same thing as a Development Right
determination), of which I can provide you the application tomorrow.
I'll be out of town all next week and would like to resubmit be fore I leave. In the grand scheme of things there
sj is no rush to resubmit as the Health.Department has not approved the soil work yet, and the plat cannot be
//� approved prior to the Health Department's approval.
t,
L-- Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2015, at 1:23 PM, Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC <richard(a�piedmontlandsurveyors.com>wrote:
I got the information for TM 119-56 off of county gis.
I'll just put the hooks as previously suggested.
Sent from my iPhone
2
On Jul 8, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Christopher Perez<cpereza,albemarle.org>wrote:
Richard,
I took a look at the revised plat (pdf) and offer the following comments on the
revision:
1.
Rev 1. Comment Addressed.
2. [14-303(C)] County GIS depicts a noncontiguous portion of Tax Map 119 Parcel
56 along the Southern parcel boundary shared with Tax Map 119 Parcel 17A and
Tax Map 119 Parcel 22 (see attached GIS depiction). Also, attached I am
providing a recorded plat by Roger Ray circa 2008, which depicts such a residue
parcel (see sheet 3 of the PDF). Please revise the plat to depict this parcel and all
applicable information for it. Rev 1. Comment not adequately addressed.
Please provide a recorded plat which depicts the portion of TMP 119-56 in
question in the location you have suggested.
3.
Rev I. comment Addressed.
4. <image001.jpg>[14-303(D)] Lot acreages. On the plat clearly list how much
acreage is contained in the original Parcel 22A, currently it is not clear. Also, on
the plat utilize land hooks to depict the portions of TMP 119-22A that are being
added to TMP 119-22. Also depict where on the plat the 0.354 acres of TMP
119-22A is located that is being added to TMP 119-22. Revise appropriately.
Rev 1. The plat has been revised in an attempt to clarify the acreages;
3
ice/
however, it still is not clearly depicted. Currently the plat has two portions
• listed as: "Portion of 119-22A being added to 119-22 (0.354 Acres Total)', one
portion on the left and one on the right. This actually makes it appear like
there are two segments of 119-22A that are each 0.354 acres and each is
being added to 119-22.The area tabulations chart is the only item which
helps provide clarity. The land hooks would be simpler and avoid confusion.
I'll leaving this one up to your professional opinion on how to handle it
(leave it as is, or revise w/land hooks).
5.
Rev 1, Comment
ddressed
6.
Rev I. Continent Addressed.
7. [14-309 & 14-310] Soil evaluations &Health director approval of septic
systems. The submitted soils evaluations were forwarded to the Health
Department, pending their approval. The plat cannot be approved until
their approval is received.
Rev 1. Comment still relevant, awaiting HD approval.
Additional comment since revision
8. [14-309 & 14-310] The plat has been revised to depict proposed
drainfields which appear to slightly cross the proposed southern property
line of the revised TMP 119-22A. This is not permitted, rather the
drainfields are to be located entirely on the lot created. Either revise the
drainfield depiction on the plat to go back to how it was originally shown
on the initial plat or revise the proposed southern property line to
encompass the entire drainfields. The end result of either action should be
that the drainfields are to be located entirely on the lot created
C(srrsiopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia
4
401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC [mailto:richard @'piedmontlandsurveyors.com]
Sent:Wednesday,July 08,2015 12:02 PM
To:Christopher Perez
Subject: RE:SUB2015-98 Ruddock- BLA
Christopher,
Would you mind taking a quick look at the attached plat?
All comments have beed addressed.
Just a few things though....
Comment(14-303C) TM 119-56 appeared to be along the northern boundary of
119-22.
Comment(14-303D) I didn't use "hooks" but added annotation to help clarify the
acreage going to 119-22.
Let me know if this looks okay to you.
Thanks
5
Piedmont Land Surveyors, PLC
Richard Burke LS
P.O. Box 250
Rixeyville, VA 22737
Ph: 540-222-5037
www.piedmontlandsurveyors.com
6