HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300008 Calculations 2013-01-17 County of Albemarle
Virginia
Engineering Manual
For
New Hope Church
Erosion Control & Drainage Calculations
First Submittal: January 17, 2013
,4cpLTH Op
Lr
p Vi ND H. 2
,. Lic.No.O'3831 4,
1�1?i/3 X44'
SSIONAL 046
Blackwell Engineering PLC
03 566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
Ph. (540)432-9555 Fax(540)434-7604
Blackwellengineenng.cam
BE# 2167
Table of Contents
Description Page
Erosion Control Narrative 1-6
Structure Sizing Calculations
VDOT LD-229 7
VDOT LD-347 (Omitted— See Underground Detention Routing)
VDOT LD-204 8
Nyloplast Inlet Chart 9
Pre- and Post-Construction Runoff Calculations 10-15
Underground Detention Routing 16-27
Inlet and Ditch Runoff Calculations 28-30
Ditch Calculations 31-37
Culvert Calculations 38-39
Outlet Protection Chart 40
Bioretention Basin Sizing Calculations 41
Sediment Trap Calculations 42
Drainage Map End
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The purpose of this project is the mass grading for all phases of construction of the New
Hope Church, entrance drive, parking lot and building for Phase 1. The site is located in
Albemarle County, west of Route 29 and north of the intersection of Dickerson Lane and
Dickerson Road. Phase 1 of the site will consist of a 200-seat church building and
adjacent parking. A total of 3.8 acres will be disturbed during construction.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The site is tree-covered with two grass-covered clearings for overhead electric power
lines. The land slopes to both the east and west at slopes ranging from 5% to 20% from a
ridgeline that runs through the middle of the site at.
ADJACENT PROPERTY
An two existing churches and a preschool abuts the property to the east, Dickerson Road
and Dickerson Lane to the south, Piney Mountain road to the west and residential land to
the north.
OFF-SITE AREA
If material is imported to or exported from the site the Contractor will coordinate with the
County ESC Administrator as to the location of the offsite fill/borrow area. The offsite
fill/borrow area shall have a valid Land Disturbing Permit.
SOILS
47C—Louisburg sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Composition
Louisburg and similar soils: 75 percent
Properties and qualities
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high(5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
1
Typical profile
*sir.-
0 to 5 inches: Sandy loam Kw=0.24 T=3
5 to 79 inches: Sandy loam Kw=0.24
65C—Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 80 percent
Properties and qualities
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam Kw=0.20 T=3
6 to 32 inches: Clay Kw=0.28
32 to 79 inches: Sandy clay loam Kw=0.28
94C—Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes
`"'`"' Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 80 percent
Properties and qualities
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate(about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Sandy loam Kw=0.24 T=3
7 to 11 inches: Sandy clay loam Kw=0.28
11 to 30 inches: Clay Kw=0.28
30 to 60 inches: Sandy clay loam Kw=0.28
2
CRITICAL EROSION AREAS
New-
The areas of critical slopes greater than 25% are identified by shading and labeling on the
site plan. A small area of critical slopes is effected by grading for the drive entrance to
the site.
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Unless otherwise indicated, all vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control
practices shall be constructed and maintained according to the minimum standards and
specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations, latest edition.
The minimum standards of the handbook shall be adhered to unless otherwise waived or
approved by a variance.
STRUCTURAL PRACTICES
1. Temporary Construction Entrance—3.02
A temporary construction entrance shall be installed as shown on the plans. During
muddy conditions, drivers of construction vehicles shall be required to clean off their
wheels before entering the highway. Runoff created during this procedure shall pass
through an approved sediment removing process.
2. Construction Road Stabilization—3.03
A 6" course of VDOT #5 coarse aggregate shall be installed immediately after
'sow grading for entrance, drive, and parking.
3. Silt Fence—3.05
A temporary sediment barrier constructed of posts, filter fabric and, in some cases, a
wire support fence, shall be installed where shown on the plans to intercept and filter
sediment and decrease flow velocities from drainage areas of limited size.
4. Storm Drain Inlet Protection—3.07
A sediment filter shall be installed at all curb and drop inlets to storm drains that
have become functional to prevent sediment from entering and accumulating in and
being transferred by the culvert and associated drainage system prior to permanent
stabilization of a disturbed project area.
5. Culvert Inlet Protection—3.08
A sediment filter shall be constructed on the upstream end of storm drain pipes to
reduce sediment laden runoff from entering the pipe.
6. Temporary Diversion Dike—3.09
A temporary diversion dike shall be constructed where shown on the plans to
channel storm water to a sediment trap.
3
7. Temporary Sediment Trap—3.13
A temporary sediment trap shall be constructed as shown on the grading plan for this
project. It shall be constructed such that runoff from disturbed areas shall
concentrate in the sediment trap before leaving the site.
8. Paved Flume—3.16
Permanent paved channels shall be constructed on slopes as shown on the plans.
9. Outlet Protection—3.18
The installation of riprap channel sections shall be installed at the downstream end
of storm drain outlets to reduce erosion and under-cutting from scouring at outlets
and to reduce flow velocities before storm water enters receiving channels below
these outlets.
10. Rock Check Dams—3.20
Small temporary stone dams constructed across a swale or drainage ditch shall be
constructed as shown on the plans.
11. Other practices shall be installed if required by Blackwell Engineering or the County
E&SC Administrator.
VEGETATIVE PRACTICES
1. Top soiling (stockpile)—3.30
Topsoil shall be stripped from areas to be graded and stockpiled for later use and shall
be stabilized by silt fencing or seeding with seed mix appropriate for the time of year.
2. Temporary and Permanent Seeding—3.31 and 3.32
Temporary and permanent seeding appropriate to the time of year shall be installed
according to Seeding and Mulching Table detail on the plan.
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
1. Sediment trapping measures shall be installed prior to any excavation on site.
2. Construction shall be conducted so that disturbance of the existing ground cover will
be minimized.
3. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operations begin and end as quickly
as possible.
4. Temporary seeding or other stabilization shall follow immediately after grading.
5. Areas that will be disturbed shall be clearly marked by flags, signs, etc.
4
6. The job superintendent shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance of all
``" erosion and sediment control practices.
7. After achieving adequate stabilization to the satisfaction of the E&SC Administrator,
the temporary E&S controls shall be removed.
PERMANENT STABILIZATION
All areas disturbed by construction and not otherwise stabilized, shall be stabilized with
permanent seeding within 7 days following finish grading. Seeding shall be done
according to standard & specification 3.32, PERMANENT SEEDING, of the handbook
Seeding shall be applied depending on time of the year according to E & S C handbook
specifications. In all seeding operations, seed, fertilizer, and lime shall be applied prior to
mulching. Erosion control blankets shall be installed over fill slopes which have been
brought to final grade and have been seeded to protect the slopes from rill and gully
erosion and to allow seed to germinate properly. Mulch(straw or fiber) shall be used on
relatively flat areas. In all seeding operations, seed, fertilizer, and lime shall be applied
prior to mulching.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
An underground detention piping system is proposed and shown on the plans. The outlet
for the facility discharges into a constructed adequate channel "Ditch #2." The water
quality requirements for Phase 1 is provided by two bio-retention basins. Long term
`'"" " maintenance of the detention facility and outlet system shall be the responsibility of the
property owner. This maintenance shall include periodic inspection, removing sediment
buildup, cleaning of outlet pipe system of sedimentation and debris.
Pre-construction runoff is: Q2 = 4.02 cfs, Q10= 5.18 cfs
Post-construction runoff is: Q2 =2.61 cfs, Qi0 =3.14 cfs
See Pre- and Post-construction runoff calculations and underground detention routing.
MAINTENANCE
In general, all erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked daily and after
each significant rainfall. The following items shall be checked in particular:
1. The seeded area shall be checked regularly to ensure that a good stand is maintained.
Areas shall be fertilized and reseeded as needed.
2. The gravel construction entrance shall be maintained in a condition, which will
prevent tracking or flow of mud onto public right-of-ways. Periodic top dressing with
additional stone or the washing and reworking of existing stone shall be required
when the stone is covered or has been pushed into the soil. It shall be returned to its
original depth of 6" (min.).
5
3. The silt fence shall be checked regularly for undermining or deterioration of the
fabric. Sediment shall be removed when the level of sediment deposition reaches half
way to the top of the barrier.
4. The outlet protection filter system shall be checked regularly for sediment buildup
that will prevent drainage. If the stone filter is clogged by sediment, it shall be
removed and cleaned or replaced. Riprap shall be inspected periodically to determine
if high flows have caused scour beneath the riprap or filter fabric dislodged any of the
stone. Care must be taken to properly control sediment-laden construction runoff,
which may drain to the point of the new installation.
5. The inlet protection structure shall be inspected after each rain and repairs made as
needed. Sediment shall be removed and the trap restored to its original dimensions
when the sediment has accumulated to one half the design depth of the trap.
4. Maintenance of the Sediment Trap shall include mowing and repair of the detention
basin berms, spillways, and grass areas; cleaning out sediment buildup; clearing of
debris and trash from the outlet pipe system. As well as the removing of sediment
when it reaches the cleanout level.
5. The temporary diversion dike shall be inspected after every storm and repairs made if
necessary. Once every two weeks whether a storm has occurred or not, the measure
shall be inspected and repairs made if needed. Damages made by construction traffic
Now-
or other activity must be repaired before the end of the working day.
6. The inlet and outlet protection filter system shall be checked regularly for sediment
buildup which will prevent drainage. If the stone filter is clogged by sediment, it
shall be removed and cleaned or replaced.
6
M '502w4 M
O t LJL 1 O
N U c c .
u) a Jv) co o = ti Now. , p
Wavy 2) o co
- _ > LL. a) c cri
a
Za cnoo m
a VUOo (? -S)
<• Z oao0o - in
O ~ N 00 00 (MO co
O 0 0 0 0 CO
J I-- O O O O O
(n LL OOOO O
2
0
0o O o 0
0 0 0
w ,,- CO N
J
W N 0 0 0 O
(n >>w In O O co I`
H 0 N N N N DM)
fy __ Ln Ln Ln Ln -
W Q
Z > a' in 000 O
W W 00 O o O Ln
—I a 6 , , c- (D
W a NN NN CA 0
D000m m- woo
+' N
Cn CO OO O O O 'C ....,
CT LL CO CD CO co (D >
5 06 , 46 d a)
W O
fir' ..W17'.) .0
O
Q
_I =
O ((D ((O ((O. (�D .E)
a' LL Z M (C (C (C 0
m I co
2
E
�j W •E Q000 O
J , o 0 0 0
Z Z xi Lri Lci Lci
N 0 0) N IN N- CO 0
N 0 g 0000 0
- QQn
0
O• U W N N- O C O O —
p z O O O O O G
H• LL
D U LL
mZUWO U mmmm v mL
O U
0000 o t`
OW 0, o �
U 0
Z ` to co O
rn O
x - w z W N oo 0 Ln N 4- N ,-
N W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
w .
N Q a � Q c Q O U
•0 W H L N O)
yy
N- > 12 Z ti N- (D LO , a
, W ~ L c6 ca
N CO a O - -0 CA
F- v0) EN
LT_ 0 Z C)) co N- CD N O a. O
y u- Z Q. (v6 Q
7
- k
\ � j
\ § _ (
a. = t
4 \ ( 6d6
Ci
o
} §
._ [ / (
E \
® ( \ ci__
ff
U) ///
c6 c•O c6
} _�,i 0
w 00
C/
_VI c0 cc) (\ \
e °} }a (
000 77 /
t //§ )� )
- h §5§
® \ \ [ \\\o o
° ( \ ( 066
4 ( j \ 2\\
° 0 o2 000
- \ 000
o
\ ( z / ƒ y §)f
\ ( w � � _®\�\
/ ! Z e
} ) (\ � \
m w _ _ 8
QS
l
1
1 g 1 8 '2
0 c) W 3'
t -r . :-= . ..t
0 so 0- 0 :.
a
a
c;
L i 3
6
,r)
co.
a 8
C.)
IMAM
O tal
C7 NI .3
gtr g
Il
g ci i ,N
V.1 -
P1
. a
es ci 1 tl
III 3
12 1 5 Ak'
li.-7
1
c 111111111111 . _ ,r).;,..,13.1
c4
Egimig
,....,„ ...
II ci
.1-K
Q ism
ion
Elm
,.,
4 -V
Milli-lil
Emig
c..
1.0kIV ..;
IliMMIE
5 c).
MOM .
— v
EL 1.1h 15
. n5
111111MEI : (11
IlL:i
8 8 8 8 8 X 8 X 8 X
di cd t,: .gi ..$ -.4, ,•-; e•J .. +6
OP)APIrdin 1' t
co li)
A-J 1-)
4.) q)
H ,--f
NISI. r-$
*-. •C:
I—I I--I
9
1/17/2013
No"' Runoff Calculations - Rational Method
Existing Flow From Site
1.) Area = 3.76 ac Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2.) C = 0.21 0.25 ac @ 0.30 Grass
0.00 ac @ 0.90 Impervious
3.51 ac @ 0.20 Trees
3.) Time of Concentration
a. Overland: (200'i L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-1: T,= 0.0 min.
b. Shallow: (1000' i L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
T,= L/60V Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
c. Channel: L= ft. Height= 0 ft.(paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.(unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
d. Total Tc: Tc= 0.0 min.
4.) Rainfall Intensities:
For Tc= 5 min. : 12 = 5.18 iph 125= 7.48 iph
110 = 6.67 iph 150 = 8.04 iph
1100= 8.76 iph
5.) Peak Flows: Q =ACI
Q2 = 4.02 cfs Q25 = 5.81 cfs
Q10= 5.18 cfs Q50= 6.25 cfs
Q100= 6.81 cfs
Blackwell Engineering
566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
2167 Detention Pond Sizing.xlsx
10
Runoff Calculations - Rational Method
Proposed Flow From Site
1.) Area = 3.76 ac Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2.) C = 0.47 2.58 ac @ 0.30 Grass
1.08 ac @ 0.90 Impervious
0.10 ac @ 0.20 Landscape Trees
3.) Time of Concentration
a. Overland: (200' i L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-1: T,= 0.0 min.
b. Shallow: (1000'I L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
T,= L/60V Subtotal T, = 0.0 min.
c. Channel: L= ft. Height= 0 ft.(paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
L= 0 ft. Height= 0 ft.(unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
d. Total Tc: Tc = 0.0 min.
4.) Rainfall Intensities:
For Tc= 5 min. : 12 = 5.18 iph 125= 7.48 iph
110 = 6.67 iph 150 = 8.04 iph
1100= 8.76 iph
5.) Peak Flows: Q =ACI
Q2 = 9.15 cfs Q25 = 13.20 cfs
Q10= 11.77 cfs Q50= 14.20 cfs
Q100= 15.47 cfs
Blackwell Engineering
566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
2167 Detention Pond Sizing.xlsx
11
1/17/2013
DETENTION POND PRELIMINARY SIZING CALCULATIONS
New Hope Church
Equations used: Tc = sgrt[2 x C x A x a x (b-tc/4)/Qe]-b
Vp = 0.5 x tc x 2.67 x (Qp-Qe+Qu)x 60
Vc = [QcxT+ {Qcxtc/4}-{QexT/2}-{3xQextc/4}] x60
Q = AxCxl
Where: I = rainfall intensity for storm duration T.
tc = time of concentrantion, minutes
Tc = critical storm duration, minutes
tc = watershed time of concentration, minutes
Vp = peak storm storage volume required, cubic feet
Vc = critical storm storage volume required, cubic feet
Qe = existing peak flow for storm duration tc, cfs
Qp = proposed peak flow for storm duration tc, cfs
Qc = proposed critical flow for storm duration Tc, cfs
Qa = allowable peak outflow, cfs
2 Year 10 Year
a = 106.02 161.6
b = 15.51 18.73
Existing Conditions: A = 3.76 ac tc = 5.0 min
C = 0.2066
Proposed Conditions: A = 3.76 ac tc = 5.0 min
C = 0.4697
Design procedure: 1.) Existing rainfall intensities:
12 = 5.18 iph
110 = 6.67 iph
2.) Existing peak discharge Qe:
Qe2 = 4.02 cfs
Qe10 = 5.18 cfs
3.) Proposed peak rainfall intensities:
12 = 5.18 iph
110 = 6.67 iph
4.) Proposed peak discharge Qp (for tc):
Qp2 = 9.15 cfs
Qp10 = 11.77 cfs
Blackwell Engineering
'"+r" 566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
2167 Detention Pond Sizing.xlsx
12
1/17/2013
5.) Determine Volume for tc (peak storm volume):
Vp2 = 2,049 cf
Vp10 = 2,637 cf
6.) Uncontrolled Flow:
Area = 0.40 ac (Entrance and drive)
Qu2 = 0.97 cfs
Qu10 = 1.25 cfs
7.) Offsite Flow:
Area = 0 ac tc= 0 min
C = 0 12= 0.0
Qi2 = 0.00 cfs 110= 0.0
Qi10 = 0.00 cfs
8.) Allowable Release Rate:
Qa2 = 3.05 cfs
Qa10 = 3.93 cfs
Nor'
Blackwell Engineering
'w•° 566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
2167 Detention Pond Sizing.xlsx
13
1/17/2013
2 YEAR CRITICAL DURATION STORM FOR RATIONAL METHOD
USING a AND b COEFFICIENTS
2 YEAR CRITICAL DURATION STORM
PROJECT NAME: New Hope Church
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
a= 106.02 A= 3.76 Acres
b= 15.51 C= 0.47
t�= 0.00 minutes
q.= 3.05 cfs
Where Tc= critical storm duration in minutes
C= Rational coefficient for developed area
A= drainage area in acres(post development)
to= Time of Concentration after development in minutes
q., allowable peak outflow in cfs
Tc= (2CAa(b-t./4)/go)1/2-b
Tc= 28.12 minutes (critical duration)
I = Rainfall Intensity(inches/hour)
I = a/(b+Tc)
I= 2.43 inches/hour for critical duration
Critical Duration= 28.12 minutes
Critical Duration Rainfall= 2.43 inches/hour
Sow Peak inflow(Qo)= 4.29 cfs for Critical Duration
V= ((QoTc)+(Qotc/4)-(goTc/2)-(3gotc/4))60
Approx.Basin Vol.= 4,666 cubic feet
CRITICAL DURATION HYDROGRAPH
50 —
4.5
4.0
•
3.5
3.0
LL 2.5 --
0 2.0 -
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0• •
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
MINUTES
'`w eo
2167 Detention Pond Sizing.xlsx
14
1/17/2013
10 YEAR CRITICAL DURATION STORM FOR RATIONAL METHOD
�..o USING a AND b COEFFICIENTS
10 YEAR CRITICAL DURATION STORM
PROJECT NAME: New Hope Church
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
a= 161.60 A= 3.76 Acres
b= 18.73 C= 0.47
tc= 0.00 minutes
qo= 3.93 cfs
Where Tc= critical storm duration in minutes
C = Rational coefficient for developed area
A= drainage area in acres(post development)
tc= Time of Concentration after development in minutes
go= allowable peak outflow in cfs
Tc= (2CAa(b-tc/4)/q jh/2-b
Tc= 33.45 minutes (critical duration)
I = Rainfall Intensity(inches/hour)
I = a/(b+Tc)
I= 3.10 inches/hour for critical duration
Critical Duration= 33.45 minutes
Critical Duration Rainfall= 3.10 inches/hour
"` Peak inflow(Qo)= 5.47 cfs for Critical Duration
V= ((QoTc)+(Qotc/4)-(goTc/2)-(3gotc/4))60
Approx. Basin Vol.= 7,036 cubic feet
CRITICAL DURATION HYDROGRAPH
6.0
• •
5.0
4.0
y
its 3.0 --- ---
C
2.0 —- — -
1.0
0.0•
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
MINUTES
2167 Detention Pond Sizing.xlsx
15
1
Watershed Model Schematic
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk, Inc.v8
1-Existing Site Runoff 2-Proposed Site Runoff
v
3-UG Detention Of
Legend
Hvd. Origin Description
1 Rational Existing Site Runoff
Rational Proposed Site Runoff
%`3 Reservoir UG Detention
Project: 2167.gpw Tuesday, Jan 8, 2013
16
2
Hydrograph Return Period Recap
y raflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk, Inc.v8
I4yd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow(cfs) Hydrograph
moo. type hyd(s) Description
(origin) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
1 Rational 4.090 ----- --- 5.263 Existing Site Runoff
2 Rational -- 9.153 11.78 ----- Proposed Site Runoff
3 Reservoir 2 2.607 3.142 ---- UG Detention
Proj. file:2167.gpw Tuesday, Jan 8, 2013
17
3
Hydrograph Summary Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk, Inc.v8
I'+yd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
Now le°. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 4.090 1 5 1,227 -- ---- Existing Site Runoff
2 Rational 9.153 1 5 2,746 Proposed Site Runoff
3 Reservoir 2.607 1 9 2.744 2 523.77 1,835 UG Detention
2167.gpw Return Period: 2 Year Tuesday, Jan 8, 2013
18
4
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
Hyd. No. 1
Existing Site Runoff
Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 4.090 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min
Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,227 cuft
Drainage area = 3/60 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.21
Intensity = 5.180 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min
IDF Curve = Albemarle.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1
Existing Site Runoff
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 --2 Year Q (cfs)
5.00 -I- -- --- --i
- ---- -- -- - - 5.00
4.00
- - - - -- --- — 4.00
3.00
- - - - - 3.00
2.00
— - - - 2.00
1.00
- _ 1.00
0.00 i 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Hyd No. 1 Time(min)
19
5
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
,,�, Hyd. No. 2
Proposed Site Runoff
Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 9.153 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 5 min
Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 2,746 cuft
Drainage area = 3.760 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.47
Intensity = 5.180 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min
IDF Curve = Albemarle.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1
Proposed Site Runoff
Q (cfs) Q cfs
Hyd. No. 2--2 Year ( )
10.00 10.00
8.00
8.00
6.00
6.00
/ \
/ \,
4.00 , - - - - - 4.00
2.00 , 2.00
0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-°� Hyd No. 2
Time(min)
20
6
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
..,.. Hyd. No. 3
UG Detention
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.607 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 9 min
Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 2,744 cuft
Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Proposed Site Runoff Max. Elevation = 523.77 ft
Reservoir name = UG Detention 6-8 Max. Storage = 1,835 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
UG Detention
Q (cfs) Q (cfs
Hyd. No. 3--2 Year )
10.00 10.00
....® A
8.00 ' --
8.00
6.00 -- - -
6.00
4.00 - -- 4.00
2.00
... 2.00
i
0.00 _, - - 0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
Time(min)
,-° Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2 i i 1 1 i i Total storage used = 1,835 cuft
21
Pond Report 7
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Aufodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
Pond No. 1 - UG Detention 6-8
Pond Data
UG Chambers-Invert elev.=521.00 ft , Rise x Span=4.00 x 4.00 ft , Barrel Len=200.00 ft, No.Barrels=1 , Slope=0.00%, Headers=No
Stage/Storage Table
Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cuft)
0.00 521.00 n/a 0 0
0.40 521.40 n/a 131 131
0.80 521.80 n/a 227 358
1.20 522.20 n/a 276 635
1.60 522.60 n/a 304 939
2.00 523.00 n/a 318 1,257
2.40 523.40 n/a 318 1,575
2.80 523.80 n/a 304 1,880
3.20 524.20 n/a 276 2,156
3.60 524.60 n/a 227 2,383
4.00 525.00 n/a 131 2,514
Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise(in) = 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span(in) = 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No.Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33
Invert El.(ft) = 521.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = -- - ---
Length(ft) = 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No
Slope(%) = 1.00 0.00 0.00 n/a
N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Contour)
Multi-Stage = n/a No No No TW Elev.(ft) = 0.00
Note Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic)and outlet(oc)control.Weir risers checked for onfice conditions(ic)and submergence(s).
Stage/Storage/Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total
ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
0.00 0 521.00 0.00 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.000
0.40 131 521.40 0.47 is --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- 0.471
0.80 358 521.80 1.01 oc --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.010
1.20 635 522.20 1.50 oc -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.498
1.60 939 522.60 1.86 oc --- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- 1.863
2.00 1,257 523.00 2.17 oc --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 2.167
2.40 1,575 523.40 2.42 is --- --- -- - --- --- --- --- --- 2.416
2.80 1,880 523.80 2.64 is -- --- --- --- - --- --- --- --- 2.639
3.20 2,156 524.20 2.85 ic -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 2.845
3.60 2,383 524.60 3.04 is -- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- 3.037
4.00 2,514 525.00 3.22 is --- - --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 3.218
22
8
Hydrograph Summary Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk, Inc.v8
I
'yd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
,wo. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 5.263 1 5 1,579 --- Existing Site Runoff
2 Rational 11.78 1 5 3.534 ----- Proposed Site Runoff
3 Reservoir 3.142 1 9 3.532 2 524.90 2,458 UG Detention
2167.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Tuesday, Jan 8, 2013
23
9
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
Hyd. No. 1
Existing Site Runoff
Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 5.263 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min
Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,579 cuft
Drainage area = 3.760 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.21
Intensity = 6.666 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min
IDF Curve = Albemarle.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1
Q (cfs) Existing Site Runoff
Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year Q (cfs)
6.00
-- - -- - - - 6.00
'Iwo, 5.00 ---- --- -- -
--- — -- - --- - - - --- — 5.00
4.00 4.00
3.00 A -- -
3.00
2.00 4
2.00
1.00
— - - - 1.00
0.00
----- - - -[ — -- — - - -- - -- 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
,,. Hyd No. 1 Time(min)
24
Hydrograph Report 10
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
�- Hyd. No. 2
Proposed Site Runoff
Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 11.78 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 5 min
Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 3,534 cuft
Drainage area = 3.760 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.47
Intensity = 6.666 in/hr Tc by User = 5.00 min
IDF Curve = Albemarle.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1
Proposed Site Runoff
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2-- 10 Year Q (cfs)
12.00 - -- - 12.00
.10.00
10.00
8.00 ‘ 8.00
/ \
/
6.00
N. 6.00
4.00
- -- - - 4.00
2.00 2.00
0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
s..,. a Hyd No. 2 Time(min)
25
11
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
Hyd. No. 3
UG Detention
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 3.142 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 9 min
Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 3,532 cuft
Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Proposed Site Runoff Max. Elevation = 524.90 ft
Reservoir name = UG Detention 6-8 Max. Storage = 2,458 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
UG Detention
Q (cfs) Q (cfs
Hyd. No. 3-- 10 Year )
12.00 12.00
-- -- --- --
r'1000 10.00
8.00
8.00
6.00 l +,
6.00
i I
4.00
4.00
I I I
2.00 2.00
0.00
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46
�re Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2 1 I ! I I Total storage used = 2,458 cuft Time(min)
26
12
Hydraflow Rainfall Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc.v8 Tuesday,Jan 8,2013
*ay,
Return Intensity-Duration-Frequency Equation Coefficients(FHA)
Period
(Yrs) B D E (N/A)
1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2 49.0200 10.5000 0.8200
3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5 55.7100 11.5000 0.8000
10 46.9500 9.5000 0.7300
25 40.1100 7.7500 0.6600
50 35.6800 6.5000 0.6100
100 31.0900 5.0000 0.5500
File name:Albemarle.IDF
Intensity=B/(Tc+ D)AE
Return Intensity Values(in/hr)
Period
(Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 5.18 4.12 3.44 2.97 2.63 2.36 2.14 1.97 1.82 1.70 1.59 1.50
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 5.91 4.79 4.05 3.53 3.13 2.83 2.58 2.38 2.21 2.06 1.94 1.83
10 6.67 5.37 4.55 3.97 3.54 3.21 2.94 2.72 2.54 2.38 2.24 2.12
25 7.48 6.01 5.10 4.47 4.01 3.65 3.36 3.13 2.93 2.76 2.61 2.48
50 8.04 6.45 5.49 4.83 4.35 3.98 3.68 3.43 3.22 3.05 2.89 2.76
100 8.76 7.01 5.98 5.29 4.79 4.40 4.09 3.83 3.62 3.43 3.27 3.13
Tc=time in minutes.Values may exceed 60.
Precip.file name:Rockinqham.pcp
Rainfall Precipitation Table(in)
Storm
Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
SCS 24-hour 3.00 2.60 0.00 3.30 3.90 4.70 5.40 6.10
SCS 6-Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-41h 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27
File:2167 Tc Albemade.xlsx Printed:1/15/2013
xtorrir
Runoff Calculations - Rational Method
Drainage Area #1 to Existing Culvert in Route 606
1.) Area= 1.89 ac Project Name: New Hope Community Church
Project# : 2167
2.) C = 0.48 0.95 ac @ 0.30 Grass
0.62 ac @ 0.90 Phase 1 and 2 Impervious
0.32 ac @ 0.20 Trees
3.) Time of Concentration Slope
a. Overland: (200'max) L = ft. Height= ft.
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-1: T,= 0.0 min.
b. Shallow: (1000' max) L = ft. Height= ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
L= ft. Height= ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
T,= L/60V Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
c. Channel: L= ft. Height= ft.(paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
L= ft. Height= ft.(unpaved;
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
Subtotal T, = 0.0 min.
d. Total Tc: T,= 0.0 min.
4.) Rainfall Intensities:
For T,= 5 min. 12 = 5.18 iph 125 = 7.48 iph
110 = 6.67 iph 1100= 8.76 iph
5.) Proposed Flows: Q =ACI
02 = 4.70 cfs 025 = 6.78 cfs
010= 6.05 cfs 0100 = 7.95 cfs
28
File:2167 Tc Albemarle.xlsx Printed:1/15/2013
Now
Runoff Calculations - Rational Method
Drainage Area #2 to Proposed Entrance Culvert 2-1
1.) Area= 1.57 ac Project Name: New Hope Community Church
Project#: 2167
2.) C = 0.43 0.85 ac @ 0.30 Grass
0.40 ac @ 0.90 Phase 1 and 2 Impervious
0.32 ac @ 0.20 Trees
3.) Time of Concentration Slope
a. Overland: (200' max) L = ft. Height= ft.
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-1: T,= 0.0 min.
b. Shallow: (1000'max) L = ft. Height= ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
L= ft. Height= ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
,,,. T,= L/60V Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
c. Channel: L= ft. Height= ft.(paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
L= ft. Height= ft.(unpaved;
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
d. Total Tc: T,= 0.0 min.
4.) Rainfall Intensities:
For T,= 5 min. 12 = 5.18 iph 125 = 7.48 iph
110 = 6.67 iph 1100= 8.76 iph
5.) Proposed Flows: Q =ACI
02 = 3.52 cfs 025 = 5.08 cfs
Q10= 4.53 cfs 0100 = 5.95 cfs
29
File:2167 Tc Albemarle.xlsx Printed:1/15/2013
Nifty
Runoff Calculations - Rational Method
Drainage Sub-Area #2.1 - Existing Ditch from Phase 2 Parking Lot
1.) Area= 0.30 ac Project Name: New Hope Community Church
Project# : 2167
2.) C = 0.64 0.13 ac @ 0.30 Grass
0.17 ac @ 0.90 Phase 2 Impervious
0.00 ac @ 0.00 Other
3.) Time of Concentration Slope
a. Overland: (200' max) L = ft. Height= ft.
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-1: T,= 0.0 min.
b. Shallow: (1000'max) L = ft. Height= ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
L= ft. Height= ft.
Average velocity= 0.0 fps (unpaved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-6: T,= 0.0 min.
T,= L/60V Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
c. Channel: L= ft. Height= ft.(paved)
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T,= 0.0 min.
L= ft. Height= ft.(unpaved;
VDOT Drainage Manual Appendix 6D-5: T, = 0.0 min.
Subtotal T,= 0.0 min.
d. Total Tc: T,= 0.0 min.
4.) Rainfall Intensities:
For T,= 5 min. 12 = 5.18 iph 125= 7.48 iph
110= 6.67 iph 1100 = 8.76 iph
5.) Proposed Flows: Q =ACI
Q2 = 0.99 cfs 025= 1.44 cfs
Q10= 1.28 cfs 0100= 1.68 cfs
30
Ale: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Ditch#1 -From Bioretention Basin#1 (Minimum Slope)
Tc=5min A=0.16 ac C =0.90 12= 5.18 in/hr 110 =6.67 in/hr
Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 0.75 cfs 0.96 cfs
Slope S = 6.80 %
Lining Type = 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 4 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type = 1 V ditch
Left side slope = 3 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.43 ft 0.55 ft
Area A= 0.55 sf 0.91 sf
Hydraulic radius R= 0.20 ft 0.26 ft
VxR= 0.82 1.04
Manning's n = 0.093 Class C 0.149 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 0.80 cfs 1.07 fps
Manning's Equation = 1.44 fps 0.97 cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 4 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 0.96 cfs)
Source: Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
31
File: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Ditch#1 -From Bioretention Basin#1 (Maximum Slope)
Tc= 5min A=0.16ac C =0.90 12=5.18in/hr Ito=6.67in/hr
Sow
Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 0.75 cfs 0.96 cfs
Slope S = 12.00 %
Lining Type = 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 3 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type = 1 V ditch
Left side slope = 3 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.42 ft 0.54 ft
Area A= 0.53 sf 0.87 sf
Hydraulic radius R= 0.20 ft 0.26 ft
VxR = 0.60 0.77
Manning's n = 0.115 Class C 0.184 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 0.81 cfs 1.13 fps
Manning's Equation = 1.53 fps 0.99 cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 3 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 0.96 cfs)
Source: Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
32
File: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Ditch#1 -At Upstream End of Entrance Culvert 2-1
T,= 5min A=1.57 ac C =0.43 12= 5.18 in/hr 110=6.67 in/hr
Now
Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 3.52 cfs 4.53 cfs
Slope S = 6.10 %
Lining Type = 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 4 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type = 1 V ditch
Left side slope = 3 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.69 ft 0.89 ft
Area A= 1.43 sf 2.38 sf
Hydraulic radius R= 0.33 ft 0.42 ft
V x R= 1.31 1.69
Manning's n = 0.070 Class C 0.108 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 3.56 cfs 1.91 fps
New Manning's Equation = 2.49 fps 4.54]cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 4 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 4.53 cfs)
Source:Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
33
File: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Ditch#2 -From UG Detention (Minimum Slope)
(Discharges from Underground Detention Routing)
Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 2.61 cfs 3.14 cfs
Slope S = 4.40 %
Lining Type = 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 5 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type = 1 V ditch
Left side slope = 3 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.64 ft 0.81 ft
Area A= 1.23 sf 1.97 sf
Hydraulic radius R= 0.30 ft 0.38 ft
VxR= 1.52 1.92
Manning's n = 0.065 Class C 0.100 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 2.69 cfs 1.66 fps
'""' Manning's Equation = 2.19 fps 3.27 cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 5 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 3.14 cfs)
Source:Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
34
File: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Ditch#2 -From UG Detention (Average Slope)
(Discharges from Underground Detention Routing)
v... Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 2.61 cfs 3.14 cfs
Slope S = 10.50 %
Lining Type = 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 3 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type = 1 V ditch
Left side slope= 3 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.61 ft 0.78 ft
Area A= 1.12 sf 1.83 sf
Hydraulic radius R = 0.29 ft 0.37 ft
V x R= 0.87 1.11
Manning's n = 0.090 Class C 0.143 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 2.63 cfs 1.74 fps
slaw- Manning's Equation = 2.36 fps 3.18 cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 3 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 3.14 cfs)
Source:Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
35
File: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Ditch#2-From UG Detention (Maximum Slope)
(Discharges from Underground Detention Routing)
Now. Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 2.61 cfs 3.14 cfs
SlopeS = 13.10 %
Lining Type= 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 3 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type = 1 V ditch
Left side slope = 3 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.59 ft 0.75 ft
Area A= 1.04 sf 1.69 sf
Hydraulic radius R= 0.28 ft 0.36 ft
VxR = 0.84 1.07
Manning's n = 0.092 Class C 0.146 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 2.63 cfs 1.85 fps
N""" Manning's Equation = 2.52 fps 3.14 cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 3 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 3.14 cfs)
Source: Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
Nsettsr
36
File: 2167 Ditch.xlsx OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATIONS Printed: 1/15/2013
Existing Ditch#3 -Drainage from Phase 2 Parking Lot
T,= 5min A=0.30 ac C =0.64 12= 5.18 in/hr I,o=6.67in/hr
Project Name: New Hope Church
Project# : 2167
2 Year 10 Year
Discharge Q = 0.99 cfs 1.28 cfs
Slope S = 10.00 %
Lining Type = 2 Kentucky bluegrass
Permissible V= 4 fps (Table 5-14)
Channel Type= 1 V ditch
Left side slope = 2 : 1
Right side slope = 3 : 1
2 Year 10 Year
Depth d = 0.47 ft 0.61 ft
Area A= 0.55 sf 0.93 sf
Hydraulic radius R= 0.22 ft 0.28 ft
V x R= 0.87 1.13
Manning's n = 0.089 Class C 0.141 Class B (Plate 5-29)
Manning's Equation = 1.05 cfs 1.44 fps
Manning's Equation = 1.90 fps 1.34 cfs
(OK. Less than permissible 4 fps) (OK. Greater than actual 1.28 cfs)
Source: Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Chapter 5.
37
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc. Monday,Jan 14 2013
''r' Existing 15-inch RCP Culvert in Route 606 at DA #1
Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 490.93 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 52.66 Qmin (cfs) = 6.05
Slope (%) = 1.41 Qmax (cfs) = 6.05
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 491.67
Rise (in) = 15.0 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2
Shape = Cir Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.0 Qtotal (cfs) = 6.05
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 6.05
n-Value = 0.013 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00
Inlet Edge = 0 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 5.20
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0045, 2, 0.0317, 0.69, 0.5 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 5.76
Embankment
HGL Dn (ft) = 492.05
HGL Up (ft) = 492.67
Top Elevation (ft) = 495.32 Hw Elev (ft) = 493.29
Top Width (ft) = 20.00 Hw/D (ft) = 1.30
Crest Width (ft) = 10.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Eli",'A Existing 15-inch RCP Culvert in Route 606 at DA#1 liw Depth titt
49r5 23 4.33
435:I3 - fir} ` �
i, 3 33
,,' : '
433.-r r` u
. _ e ,, ta
4:2.2c3
:'.33
431.33 -,._ 7
430.3x5
-L.7
43:. !:'
^ -2. •7
3 13 15 23 25 5 . 5:J 55 55 7J 75
.'r advert HGL --.- - Ernban-
Reach h i
`fir
38
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2011 by Autodesk,Inc. Monday,Jan 14 2013
`" Entrance Culvert 1 - 2
Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 494.40 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 65.30 Qmin (cfs) = 4.53
Slope (%) = 3.22 Qmax (cfs) = 4.53
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 496.50 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2
Rise (in) = 15.0
Shape = Cir Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.0 Qtotal (cfs) = 4.53
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 4.53
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00
Inlet Edge = 0 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 4.09
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0045, 2, 0.0317, 0.69, 0.5 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 5.00
HGL Dn (ft) = 495.46
Embankment HGL Up (ft) = 497.37
Top Elevation (ft) = 498.00 Hw Elev (ft) = 497.81
Top Width (ft) = 10.00 Hw/D (ft) = 1.05
Crest Width (ft) = 10.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Niwar
Elev ink Entrance Culvert 1 -2 Her Depth Int
499.30
2.53
498.30
,.SD
Inlet contr:d
497.:'D
0 50
438.aD -3.53
495.33
gIIIIIIIIII -1.53
494)0
_2.53
493..E
-3.53
3 5 10 15 20 25 33 35 43 45 53 55 53 55 70 75 83 85 80
sir Cutrert HOL Embank
Reach kilt
39
-.J
EE
—
V) V) V) V) 7)
Lti Z
a *)
H. U U U 1 J
I IJ
()
,,)
1,1 0 i ,Y)
I I I 1 1 1 1 Z
r,
3.ai4 'az 1.'s' de.R1 it! inp
Ci C)
' • 111TEM...4MIVII-FT`aingtfflr -
-- - ii ;-..9 `-.--f- '
..,,
-1=91111 .--.16-klirifftbar7 -"'""4•3211111114Migare-MtagEMINI".411112: 111ftets.
2IRIM 0
- -■Ir, — or
7."""41011 .,p549 . .,.._- - • = p 1 12--- ---n-, ===r--- =.—— . .4%
4•11/
-,<
_ __ - -----4.--.---.---zr•----•=7.4321 1-,----a-- 45'," -Is.-
tir....----7
4711110616,„"alV 7_
_- , • -
L1J
__Ing2Iumira =NM e.t. ah. , c)
Illkill".""-••---'.,.-...- : - _ — :saw-s=mastegea ..-::=3fts-w.9 4
a.-........----
IMMISE......mfti= . ''''''-*--''Im ..._.._................ .._ .0.9.1'AO 11111Lit 1
..--... •
.. ,. ------ =7=:-.W.. 9 = p----..-. .._. ....."-------...- kg_ '
....._ ._-.r if)
— - r-L- ==...x!r=" mem- 46,c
_ 7111IME. i7."1411111ME .--'"1111M
. -
_ ., ...-...... ......--...........
•
--.........--
-- .. ...
,
t5 --- PIIIII- .-_- M.MINI"- bk.= •
MIN.71,_BNIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM
-.4.
i Will Mir-- MI 4' Xt.
Willii4IlainIli --;-- _j__ * .65 --0:•
41.111111--'41111111111Trig Cu
1111(
111111114 d___71111111MINIMT11111111. oe- 4.. s:e.,
...
INIMINIft ■ '4* '4.,0 ,
hilih. ""IIMMEEMMIII —c? .mix_ ., cp
_umagop, .16.-44 .irrz.... • -,........_ _ .....,_.
-• -:*-
---. .,„M111111111 7"----c---74___ _—.=-___--:— -:. . 4110111MI INI
- F-----7-,-,_ eMe -,•.--f.. =j,....;.7"---r-:_......--=— -7,7 •
amil 4,;
:,..., .....
r,..1•
1.-:
1-4
'EML
MMIABL,IiMr. . `MN 111•••■•:1111
... '' :— NV
CI <1.1
--7. -------MEM melt ISM M Lel
C.
'414111.
, ........... EI
--I v...4
--1 allqi1WC ,-
,-
LI. _
III==
__, ............. ,_. _ _ ;,-.. . CI
IM--611ii
._.
......... WM ,IIII 11111•11•111111.1*
.NI NIIIIMMIIMN=MI1111E1111E=BaalIMIMM 111=1.
•.4■■•••••.
C) '--- EMBERIL..' . "4111511Marall ,
Lt-Ix co -t-
u.,
o '
INNIIIIINSIMME 4 'illea.. 1111 : ..4` 1
Ct.LLJ .0 Ilh bi. MINOIIMI
,-. -I 110) MINIIIIIIN WWII MIME:II
CL st 0) 0 MOMME :MIIIIIMIMPOIMIOIMNMWIL .
..0 11. 1 ,
111.011111 4 11
0 0 0 ■to
M \ )
B id) + )
INK
MIL p... , _... •
CD ID ,,, Ur) al 1 h. r.4
rc
dl In OS ___—--,--,-.,..i _ _ et)
II 0.- ‘% 111111 -
...,
a
— ..t-- ,....mir as ■1
Ce c:11 ...........■a......L.:i.
IKEt.),+ tr> "" -` 14--z...==a.-.,...=.7
w" t7.=!..".===4 ------.. =--
g g eh
.. ............_. .......g......
a aiNiaraalmmilVIN
'•• ••=El: • • .'=••• =En
Ima S..■
I...1•1. % 0 === i0-..-.===.: mis
,..,. .4 •It =cm- 41.=,mono=mom
LI.I CI !NV MEM!MMMM MM.=I= I= IP
la.=
4 ,.....! ■7...741.-..S-5.1:.-1.....r.'' =
-7- :—_ •- ... 11
---, ------—...—.=
CI. •■•====211EXCESII
CC 6D' - ''''''"---"."".•"•-• I
1MaNallahaw.mama.as.
t ■a ma.m==:::V.••' .7• 11
=2=Mignan
I -71 1
--trams p-,
I- Ci 1
g 74 m
a ■
r 1 0
1-1 0
..r 0
il-0•••• II
0 .
03
X ima c
5 i as -4
...J. ...•
11
CI 2 44 0.ea
Cx Ct.Gi
Ellop.,
tl)
E-_-
0 w
c I,
a) 3
ir-0
40
File: 2167 Bio Retention.xls Printed: 1/15/2013
,,,r„ BIO-RETENTION BASIN SIZING
BIO-RETENTION BASIN#1 (Virginia SWM Handbook Figure 3.11-2)
Design Criteria: Drainage area = 0.16 ac
Imperv. Area = 0.13 ac
% Impervious = 85%
Bio Basin Area = 5.0%
Plants per 1000 sf = 10 (based on basin size)
Shrub to Tree ratio = 3
Calculations: Basin Size:
Required Size= 287 sf
Actual Width (W) = 15.0
Actual Length (L) = 20.0
Actual Size= 300 sf
Plants:
Number of Plants = 3
Number of Shrubs= 2
Number of Trees= 1
BIO-RETENTION BASIN#2 (Virginia SWM Hanbook Figure 3.11-4)
Design Criteria: Drainage area = 0.69 ac
Imperv. Area = 0.65 ac
% Impervious = 94%
`"r' Bio Basin Area = 5.0%
Plants per 1000 sf= 10 (based on basin size)
Shrub to Tree ratio = 3
Calculations: Basin Size:
Required Size = 1411 sf
Actual Width (W) = 30.0
Actual Length (L) = 47.0
Actual Size = 1410 sf
Plants:
Number of Plants = 14
Number of Shrubs= 11
Number of Trees = 4
41
File: 2167 Sediment Trap.xls Printed: 1/15/2013
"ow, NEW HOPE CHURCH
SEDIMENT TRAP CALCULATIONS
SEDIMENT TRAP ST-1
Requirements: Drainage area = 0.61 ac.
Wet storage = 67 cy per acre = 1,103 cf
Dry storage = 67 cy per acre = 1,103 cf
Calculated Size: Wet Dry
Width (W) = 10 24
Length (L) = 40 54
Depth (D) = 3.5 1.5
Area (A) = 400 1,296
Wet Volume = 0.85xWxLxD = 1,190 cf
Dry Volume = D(A(w)+A(d))/2 = 1,272 cf
Length of Stone Filter: D.A.x 6' = 4 ft.
42
woo•6uuaeui6u3poM>loo19039 :HoW-3
N 0w 409L—b£4(04S) XV3 SSS6—Z£4(04S) 3NOHd 1 1.6ZZ do '3111AS3110121YH0
N 3'Td 108Za n a H
I--- oiw6�i 6�n uosu�o
Z aa� a �� so 00£ 3lIfS '1117211 310YNIW3S 91717E Z N
U lS l W 3 999 Q,
H� fH� 3dOH M3N Q `DNII2 HHNIDNH o
0 o r
llI3 V I dV V32V 3O VNIVda
_`4r 1
k
�' \ o
. \it, ) 0 v) \
\i67°mob
V
O
-
�i w
J
Q
U
t
tkr
' _ - Ili O
i O
j
�It
t`J
\ , ,
IA‘,„+11+ 5
+t
$\1\ ,' \
■
It\I\ ' P.-
+
I”
\ \ \
\1
11 •
11 *
y{ ii
•
I ' N.
„r%/ ' ( r t
I rl 4„,, ,
k R 1 1 + i 1 f '
- , \ Niii\,114 1 \ W '''''' •," '). AloSI:t\ ,,,"
\ . \
• ti
'
II \
\ II i e�.
1, e \\ .\ -
4 44 ,\ `i a V , ` \di
\ \ ' , r �j.f / l 1
\ \ ` + ��,cis _ ''" y�-.'�-' \ '1 , '11 .
\ v vv AvV 1 .r/, v �'
1 . �� n ~■ ?.\vii'
p, \1
,- ' \ ' , c 4 yk _.= --1------ --____:------lig-m - , .\ l' ' r/ p o ,-
\\\ *♦ /'''. N/ f�
, / ,' \ \ '7i--...-- ' yrr' '.."' .---1::51 :...00,/ "
\ ,``"ire y 4i.
•
ci
*O.
\\\\
--
\ \
I \ -i
O i
\
N
is
N. �`
,, ■
\ \
I N
*Oil S LOZ 'LL 41E4-IUD(' pal E� Mp/9LZ ,' 1
��
veil