HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300008 Approval - County 2013-05-16 4�FALg�,
8 .-a-.
f'IRGINv-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434)296-5332 Fax(434) 972-4126
May 16, 2013
Ed Blackwell
566 East Market Street
Harrisonburg,Virginia 22801
RE: SDP-2013-008 New Hope Church-Initial Site Plan
Mr. Blackwell:
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative approval to the above referenced
site plan.
This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5)years from the date of this letter, provided that the
developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this
letter as provided i i section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and
thereafter diligently pursues approval of the final site plan.
An Erosion and Sediment Control Permit may be issued after the following approvals are received:
1. Approval an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the
Code of the County of Albemarle.
2. Approval of a Stormwater Management Plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the
Code.
3. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control.
4. Approval of a mitigation plan for the disturbance of Water Protection Ordinance buffers.
5. Submittal of a tree conservation checklist.
6. Reduce the slope grading and tree disturbance by using a maximum slope steepness of 2:1 (2ft
horizontal for 1 ft vertical), or an equivalent amount using retaining walls, while maintaining
appropriate entrance sight lines.
7. Reduce the travelway width of the entrance to the minimum allowed by the ordinance (18-
4.12.17c), which is 20'where the travelway does not abut parking.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are
received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A fee of$1 500.
3. Submittal cf plans directly to each of the agencies/departments listed below necessary to satisfy
the conditions of approval.
The final site plan will not be approved until the following conditions are met:
1
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for
signature until tentative approvals for the following conditions have been obtained:
Planning Division Approval of: (2 Copies are required to be submitted for review)
1. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A landscape plan meeting the requirements of section 32.7.9 of Chapter 18 of the Code,
including a tree conservation checklist.
3. [32.7.9.4(c)] Accurately show the wooded area to the north of the travelway into the site,
particularly around the gas line.This area is open around that line, and needs to be shown
correctly.
4. [32.5.2(a)] 32.5.1 (a)] The plans need to be printed with black or blue ink.This is so reductions
and copies can be easily made. Revise to be printed not in color.
5. [32.5.2 (a); 32.5.2 (e)] General information; Existing landscape features. The whole parcel needs
to be shown. Provide an existing conditions plan sheet that has the whole parcel, boundary
dimensions, topography, landscaping etc.
6. [32.5.2 (a)]General information. The conditions of the special use permit need to be stated
exactly on rhe sheet. Revise to the exact language.
7. [32.5.2 (a)] General information. Provide the parcel number and use of the abutting parcel to
the east of the property.
8. [32.5.2 (c)] Phase lines. The phase lines need to close. It is unclear if some of the improvements
are within Phase I or Phase II.
9. [32.5.2 (d)] Topography and proposed grading. New critical slopes that were not approved with
the special use permit and are not exempt are being shown in Phases 2 and 3. Remove any
disturbance of these critical slopes, or provide a waiver for this area to be reviewed and
submitted for approval by the Board of Supervisors.
10. [32.5.2 (i)]Streets, easements and travelways. Show the right-of-way lines and widths for the
existing streets.
11. [32.5.2 (m)] Ingress and egress. Show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing
street intersection from the proposed ingress and egress.
12. [32.5.2 (n)] Existing and proposed improvements. Please show the following:
a. Dimensions of walkways.Are the ones shown typical?Other pavement dimensions are
not labeled, provide the dimensions.
b. Outdoor lighting. Is any lighting being proposed? If so please show the locations.
c. Other paved areas. Provide the dimensions for the plaza areas.
d. Provide the proposed paving materials for all walks, parking lots, and plaza areas on the
plan.
Engineering Division Approval of: (submit 3 copies of the revised plans, calculations, and narratives to
Current Development Engineering along with the required review fee and transmittal forma
1. All easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control.
2. A mitigation plan for the disturbance of Water Protection Ordinance buffers.
3. VDOT approval is required for the entrance location. Comments will be forwarded when
received. [DM905, 18-32.7.2.1.b]
4. Please show existing topography extended at least 50' past the property lines. [18-32.5.2.d]
5. Please state the date of the topography. All topography should be at least visually field verified
by the designer within the last year [18-32.6.6, 14-302, Policy for date]
2
'wow Noe
6. Site appears to have critical slopes that are not delineated on the plan. Please show shading on
all areas on the parcel that exceed 25%slope.
7. This plan appears to be for the construction of phase 1 only. Please remove the phase 2 portion
of the plans from the construction/grading portion of the plan set and show the grading to be
completed with this phase of the project.
8. Please delineate the areas of light verses heavy pavement on the construction plans.
9. Upon "initial" plan approval, please submit Stormwater plans with application and fee for
official review.
10. Upon "initial" plan approval, please submit Erosion and Sediment Control plans with application
and fee for official review.
11. Please see Chapter 17 for Water Protection requirements prior to "final" site plan approval.
12. Reduce the slope grading and tree disturbance by using a maximum slope steepness of 2:1 (2ft
horizontal for 1 ft vertical), or an equivalent amount using retaining walls,while maintaining
appropriate entrance sight lines.
13. Reduce the travelway width of the entrance to the minimum allowed by the ordinance (18-
4.12.17c),which is 20' where the travelway does not abut parking.
Preliminary E&SC cpmments in advance of WPO application:
a. Plan does not appear to show adequate Erosion and Sediment Control measures to
protect adjacent properties. A Thursday meeting is recommended. See below for
meeting request information.
b. Please show the Albemarle County Temporary Paved Construction Entrance detail on
the E&SC plan.
c. Please show areas for the contractors staging, parking, materials storage, and
temporary office on the construction plan sheet.
d. West side of site appears to require a sediment trap for initial grading until the curbing
is installed to redirect stormwater flows. Silt fence does not meet the State/County
requirements for adequate protection.
e. Sediment trap on the East side of the site is shown in the proposed slope and will need
to be moved to below the slope for adequate protection.
f. Please show proposed elevations on sediment traps for construction and inspection.
g. Culvert inlet protections appears to show 1+acres draining to CIP and will require a
sediment trap design.
h. Temporary construction entrance is shown as a "one-way" entrance. Please show the
other lane to be blocked during construction or widen the entrance to allow for two-
wa:y traffic.
i. All pipes will be a minimum 15" for maintenance.
j. Energy dissipation will be required for paved ditch outlets to prevent scouring.
k. Please show profile of culvert under entrance.
I. Paved ditch shown perpendicular to roadside ditch does not appear to work and may
cause blockage and flooding of the roadway. Please change the angle of confluence and
show details for construction and inspection.
m. Paved ditches may require inlet shaping to direct/capture stormwater flows adequately.
n. Roadside ditches do not appear deep enough for the proposed Check Dams and will
cause the roadway to erode if installed. Please show the roadside ditches a minimum 2'
(feet) deep to allow for the check dam installation.
o. Slope armament may be required for"scupper" inlets to SWM facilities to prevent
erosion.
p. Underground detention appears to bypass the water quality structure. Please explain.
q. Underground detention requires at least 0.05%slope to prevent extended pounding in
structure.
3
r. All storm drain inlets will be VDOT approved inlets.
s. Ho nor existing drainage divides as much as possible. MS-19 will need to be
demonstrated for all outlets.
t. Computations must use SCS methods. The modified rational hydrograph does not
provide enough runoff volume.
u. Use standard VDOT manholes and a minimum 15" pipe. An 8" orifice setup can be used
in the manhole with an overflow to the 15" pipe
v. A minimum slope of%2% is required in the system.
w. Provide pre and post drainage area maps for the facility showing the 3.76
predevelopment acres and post development area
x. The routings and detention computations must account for areas released undetained,
like the entrance travelway. These areas should be small. Capture as much of the
development as possible for water quality treatment.
y. The bioretention outlet needs to be detailed and should accommodate flow and
overflow from the detention system.
z. Proposed SWM structure appears to be located on rock outcrop. Please provide proof
the structure can be constructed in this location.
aa. Please show SWM for entrance road impervious area.
A Stormwater Management Agreement will be submitted and approved for recordation prior to
Final Site Plan approval. The procedures can be found at this link:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/Community Development/f
orms/Engineerng and WPO Forms/Plan Review -
Stormwater Management BMP Facilities Maintenance Agreement Procedures.pdf
The SWM agreement can be found at this link:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/Community Development/f
orms/Engineering and WPO Forms/Plan Review -
Stormwater Management BMP Facilities Maintenance Agreement.pdf
14. Please see Chapter 18-32.6.2 for Final site plan requirements for approval.
15. Please refer to the Albemarle County Design Standards Manual prior to resubmittal. The link to
the ACDSM is:
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/community developme
nt/forms/design standards manual/Albemarle County Design Standards Manual 22Oct2012.
pdf
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness. (8 Copies are
required to be submitted for review)
1. Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per 30.6.4(2), (3) and (5):
None.
2. Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
None.
3. Regarding recommended conditions of initial site plan approval:
a. ARB approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan
approval.The final site plan shall show 2W' caliper trees at 40' on center(or the
equivalent thereof), at a minimum, along the entrance drive; and a mix of additional
4
, •
trees, located and spaced to achieve a natural appearance, on the slope adjacent to the
entrance drive to compensate for lost wooded area.
4. Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
a. Provide a tree conservation plan. Show tree protection fencing along all tree lines to
remain, in particular along the entrance drive.Add the installation of tree protection
fencing to the sequence of grading and erosion control work.
Albemarle County Fire & Rescue Approval. (1 Copy is required to be submitted for review)
1. There are no hydrants within 800 feet of the proposed driveway entrance.A hydrant shall be
installed at the driveway entrance to reduce the required hose lay to service this building and
future additions.
2. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and
turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4 of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention
Code
3. Roads with an unobstructed travel lane of 32 or less must have turning radius of no less than
25'.
4. A Knox box is required for this structure. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for placement
approval.
Virginia Department of Transportation Approval. (1 Copy is required to be submitted for reviewl
1. The posted speed for Route 606 in this section is 35 mph.The necessary sight distance for
35mph is 390 feet in accordance with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F-35. Please
include a vertical profile of the sight line and existing ground.
2. Final site plan will need to include the entrance profile in accordance with the CG-11 standard.
3. A Land Use Permit will be required for construction within the Route 606 right of way.
Thomas Jefferson Health Department Approval. (2 Copies are required to be submitted to the Planning
Division to be forwarded to the Thomas Jefferson Health Department for review)
1. I have received New Hope Community Church submittal and am in agreement with the
proposed septic plan. The only thing that I would say is that I am not sold on the location of the
well due to the proximity to known UST sites in the area. The Department of Environmental
Quality should be consulted before any final well site is chosen. The submitting engineer and
VDH would need to consult with DEQ about this matter. I would prefer that the well situation
be addressed before I am 100%comfortable with the site plan.
If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to
contact me at Extension 1234, myname @albemarle.org.
Sincerely,
I.
Megan Yaniglos Mark B. Graham, P.E.
Senior Planner Director of Community Development
CC: Board of Supervisors
Charles Boldt
5