Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400001 Correspondence 2014-01-09 Johnathan Newberry From: Bill Ledbetter[BLedbetter @roudabush.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:01 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: Megan Yaniglos; Dave Brockman; Raleigh Davis; Chris Mulligan Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Thanks JT. Also being able to count the accessory apartments toward our overall density goals will be a big help. I will look to hear back from you once you talk with Rebecca. Bill Bill Ledbetter Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434-977-0205 office 540-649-0190 cell 434-296-5220 fax From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto jnewberry(aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 2:56 PM To: Bill Ledbetter Cc: Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Bill, In reviewing the Code of Development, Megan and I don't see where a variation would be necessary to have this housing type. Amelia indicated that the units would be treated as an additional single-family dwelling unit on each lot. Rebecca Ragsdale has some experience with these units from reviewing permits for Belvedere. I will confer with her about it when she returns to the office. Thanks, J.T. From: Bill Ledbetter [mailto:BLedbetter©roudabush.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 1:37 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: Raleigh Davis Subject: FW: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 JT, Please remember to let me know what we need to do to allow the accessory apartments above the garages on Block 15. 1 fir" `••' Is it a variation request or something else? Thanks Bill Bill Ledbetter Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434-977-0205 office 540-649-0190 cell 434-296-5220 fax From: Dave Brockman [mailto:dave @oldtrailvillage.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:06 PM To: Bill Ledbetter Cc: Chris Mulligan; Raleigh Davis Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Just a reminder don't forget that this will require a zoning variations to add the "Beleveder accessory building code"to block 15.We should start that immediately. From: Bill Ledbetter [mailto:BLedbetter @roudabush.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:15 PM To: Dave Brockman Subject: FW: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 I will call about this shortly. BL Bill Ledbetter Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434-977-0205 office 540-649-0190 cell 434-296-5220 fax From: Megan Yaniglos [mailto:myaniglos©albemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:07 PM To: Bill Ledbetter Cc: Johnathan Newberry; Todd Shifflett Subject: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Bill: As we discussed on the phone if you show all the requirements for the site plan for the single family lots, you will not need to do a preliminary plat and can just submit a final. You will need to get your site plan approved 2 before we can approve a final plat, however. Please let me know if this is the direction you would like to go, and if so, please email me a request for withdrawal for SU82014-003. Also, the site plan will need an initial application filled out, which I have attached for your use. As for the fees, the good news is that we have not cashed the check. So the easiest way to handle this is for you to write a new check with the correct fee for an initial site plan. If you could please bring the correct application and new check, we will return the other check to you. One question I had was that on the application for the site plan there was a box checked for "reducing single family setbacks to 5 feet". I am not sure which set back this is, but I assume it is the side yard setback, correct? If so, this will need to be done as a variation, and an application with the justification for the variation will need to be submitted as well. On a side note, since there is a revised subdivision ordinance, our applications and checklists have been updated as well, and they are on our website for your use. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Megan Yaniglos, APA Senior Planner Community Development Department Planning Services ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3004 3 Johnathan Newberry From: Raleigh Davis [RDavis @roudabush.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:57 AM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: Bill Ledbetter Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Hey J.T.— I just submitted the initial site plan application as well as the 22 copies of the site plan,so they should be waiting for you at the front desk. Have a great day and let me know if you need anything else! Raleigh Davis From: Johnathan Newberry [mailto:jnewberry@@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:17 PM To: Bill Ledbetter Cc: Carla Harris - CDD; Megan Yaniglos; Chris Mulligan; Raleigh Davis Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Hey Bill, I wanted to mention a couple things following your discussion with Megan yesterday: 1. The preliminary plat(SUB201400003) has been withdrawn. 2. In order to stay on schedule for the February 20th SRC meeting, we'll need the initial site plan application along with 19 additional copies by tomorrow afternoon (or Friday at the latest). I'm requesting 19 copies because I can work with the 3 copies we currently have that are marked "preliminary site plan" and the application requires 16 copies plus an additional 6 copies(22 total) if the area falls in an Entrance Corridor. 3. Submitting the variation request separately sounds good. 4. We can accept the final plat at the same time as the final site plan. We will sign the final plat once the final site plan has been approved. Thanks, J.T. From: Bill Ledbetter [mailto:BLedbetterC@roudabush.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:14 PM To: Megan Yaniglos Cc: Johnathan Newberry; Todd Shifflett; Chris Mulligan; Raleigh Davis Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Megan, Please withdraw the application for SUB 2014-003. We will prepare a new initial site plan application and bring a check for the revised amount. Understood about the need for the variation for the setbacks in this block. I assume the variation will need to be approved prior to the final site plan approval. If that is the case, I will wait and submit the variation request separately. 1 Thanks for the heads up on the new procedures. I do think this will help speed up the process and eliminate a lot of redundant submittals from us and reviews for you guys. Bill Bill Ledbetter Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434-977-0205 office 540-649-0190 cell 434-296-5220 fax From: Megan Yaniglos [mailto:myaniglosalbemarle.orq] Sent:Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:07 PM To: Bill Ledbetter Cc: Johnathan Newberry; Todd Shifflett Subject: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Bill: As we discussed on the phone if you show all the requirements for the site plan for the single family lots, you will not need to do a preliminary plat and can just submit a final. You will need to get your site plan approved before we can approve a final plat, however. Please let me know if this is the direction you would like to go, and if so, please email me a request for withdrawal for SUB2014-003. Also, the site plan will need an initial application filled out, which I have attached for your use. As for the fees, the good news is that we have not cashed the check. So the easiest way to handle this is for you to write a new check with the correct fee for an initial site plan. If you could please bring the correct application and new check, we will return the other check to you. One question I had was that on the application for the site plan there was a box checked for "reducing single family setbacks to 5 feet". I am not sure which set back this is, but I assume it is the side yard setback, correct? If so, this will need to be done as a variation, and an application with the justification for the variation will need to be submitted as well. On a side note, since there is a revised subdivision ordinance, our applications and checklists have been updated as well, and they are on our website for your use. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Megan Yaniglos, APA Senior Planner Community Development Department Planning Services ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3004 2 sAlirev "NNW' Johnathan Newberry From: Megan Yaniglos Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 3:24 PM To: Carla Harris-CDD; Johnathan Newberry Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 JT: Looks like they submitted plans for the subdivision and not the site plan, so they will need to do that as well. Thank you, Megan From: Carla Harris - CDD Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:50 PM To: Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Megan, Please check your mailbox for the plans, and confirm if those are the plans for the SRC. The plans submitted was for SUB2014-003 and I placed them in your mailbox earlier. From: Megan Yaniglos Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:47 PM To: Johnathan Newberry Cc: Carla Harris - CDD Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 I thought they had submitted all the plans. Can you confirm, Carla? If that is the case, then we would just need the right application and fee. From: Johnathan Newberry Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:57 AM To: Megan Yaniglos Cc: Carla Harris - CDD Subject: FW: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Megan, I'd like to confirm the process for this application as it moves forward. My understanding is Roudabush plans to revise their submittal for Blocks 12 and 15 by submitting an Initial Site Plan and withdrawing the preliminary plat. To do so,our application requests 16 copies plus an additional 6 copies if it's in an EC. Carla reminded me that the deadline for distribution would be tomorrow,so did they understand they need to deliver 22 copies of the revised Initial Plan by tomorrow afternoon? If not, I can send them an email with that information. Here's a draft legal ad: 1 PROJECT: SDP201400001 Old Trail Village Blocks 12 and 15—Initial Site Plan PROPOSED: Request for initial site plan approval for 18 multi-family attached units and 5 single-family detached units in Block 12 and 19 single-family units in Block 15. ZONING CATEGORY/GENERAL USAGE: Neighborhood Model District(NMD)- residential (3-34 units/acre) mixed with commercial,service, and industrial uses. SECTION: Chapter 18 Section 32 of Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE/DENSITY: Blocks 12 and 15 are designated as Urban Density residential (6—12 units/acre) supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools, commercial,office and service uses; ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: Yes LOCATION: On the east side of Old Trail Drive, approximately 1500 ft. north from its intersection with Route 250. TAX MAP/PARCEL: 055E0-01-00-000A1 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: White Hall Thanks, J.T. From: Bill Ledbetter [mailto:BLedbetter @roudabush.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:14 PM To: Megan Yaniglos Cc: Johnathan Newberry; Todd Shifflett; Chris Mulligan; Raleigh Davis Subject: RE: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Megan, Please withdraw the application for SUB 2014-003. We will prepare a new initial site plan application and bring a check for the revised amount. Understood about the need for the variation for the setbacks in this block. I assume the variation will need to be approved prior to the final site plan approval. If that is the case, I will wait and submit the variation request separately. Thanks for the heads up on the new procedures. I do think this will help speed up the process and eliminate a lot of redundant submittals from us and reviews for you guys. Bill Bill Ledbetter Roudabush, Gale and Associates 914 Monticello Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 434-977-0205 office 540-649-0190 cell 434-296-5220 fax From: Megan Yaniglos [mailto:myaniglos @albemarle.orq] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:07 PM To: Bill Ledbetter Cc: Johnathan Newberry; Todd Shifflett Subject: SDP2014-001 and SUB2014-003 Old Trail Blocks 12&15 Bill: 2 As we discussed on the phone if you show all the requirements for the site plan for the single family lots, you will not need to do a preliminary plat and can just submit a final. You will need to get your site plan approved before we can approve a final plat, however. Please let me know if this is the direction you would like to go, and if so, please email me a request for withdrawal for SUB2014-003. Also, the site plan will need an initial application filled out, which I have attached for your use. As for the fees, the good news is that we have not cashed the check. So the easiest way to handle this is for you to write a new check with the correct fee for an initial site plan. If you could please bring the correct application and new check, we will return the other check to you. One question I had was that on the application for the site plan there was a box checked for "reducing single family setbacks to 5 feet". I am not sure which set back this is, but I assume it is the side yard setback, correct? If so, this will need to be done as a variation, and an application with the justification for the variation will need to be submitted as well. On a side note, since there is a revised subdivision ordinance, our applications and checklists have been updated as well, and they are on our website for your use. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Megan Yaniglos, APA Senior Planner Community Development Department Planning Services ph: 434.296.5832 ext. 3004 3