HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201500149 Staff Report 2016-01-12ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB- 2015 -66: Fifth Street Place
Review Type
Second review of the Final Site Development Plan with a third architectural review
Parcel Identification
076000000054I0, 0760000000541A, 076000000054A, 076000000054A2, 076000000054A3, 076000000055B, 076000000055D
Location
At the southwest corner of the intersection of I64 and 5' Street Extended
Zoned
Residential (R2 and R I 0)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner /Applicant
Gambit LLC, Snow Paws LLC et als /Dominion Realty Partners LLC (Michael M. Campbell)
Magisterial District
Scottsville
Proposal
To construct multi - family housing consisting of 200 apartment units in 5 buildings with associated site improvements.
Context
Multi- family housing is located to the west of the subject parcel. Single family residences are located across 5' Street to the south. I64 is located to the north, with the
off -ramp to the north/northeast.
Visibility
The development fronts two Entrance Corridors —164 and 5t' Street Extended. The development is expected to be visible from both corridors, but existing wooded
area to remain along the I64 corridor will limit some views. In the winter, intermittent views are available from 5t' Street to I64, and from I64 to 5t' Street.
ARB Meeting Date
January 21, 2016
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
March 16, 2015: ARB review of the Initial Site Plan, including architecture.
July 20, 2015: ARB review of the Final Site Plan, including architecture (See Attachment A for the action letter from this meeting. Comments from this meeting are also included in the analysis
section of this report.)
November 16, 2015: Work session to review site sections, building profiles, topography, perspective views, and Building 5 elevations. (Comments from this work session are included in the analysis
section of this report.)
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
COMMENTS FROM
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
THE 7/20/15 REVIEW
and the 11/16/15 WORK
SESSION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development
14.Provide site sections
New perspective views have not been submitted, but site
None.
within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that
showing the building profiles
sections have been provided to describe the relationships
new development within the corridors reflects the
and topography at each
between the apartment buildings and the topographic
traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
condition around the perimeter
conditions around the site. Views from both ECs are down
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that
of the site that fronts on an
into the site. Eye level is even with the club house roof and
proposed development within the designated Entrance
Entrance Corridor. Perspective
upper stories of the apartment buildings. Trees will
Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the
views should be provided in
eventually soften these views. The club house is situated
significant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures
order to more accurately
closest to the EC at approximately 70' from the edge of
of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote
describe the relationship of the
pavement. Building 3 at the I64 off ramp is approximately
orderly and attractive development within these corridors.
buildings and landscape to the
110' to the edge of pavement.
Applicants should note that replication of historic structures
EC.
is neither required nor desired.
Building 5 elevations were discussed at the November 16,
2015 work session. At the time, there was confusion about
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites
15.Reconsider elevations of
what changes, if any, had been made to the design. Building
as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order
Building 5 to be more in
5 (building type 4) has been revised to include arched trim,
to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
keeping with the earlier color
alternate roof forms, and reorganized towers. The level of
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines
rendering presented at the
detail appears to be consistent with the other buildings
require attention to four primary factors: compatibility
previous meeting. All building
proposed in the development and with other approved
with significant historic sites in the area; the character of
elevations fronting on the EC
designs in the ECs. The building generally appears
the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
require the same appropriate
appropriate for the EC.
landscaping.
level of detail.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing
structures should respect the traditions of the architecture
17.Revised drawings
of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville
addressing #s 14 and 15 may
and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in
return for a work session.
the area, as well as drawings of architectural features,
which provide important examples of this tradition are
WS: Include a list of changes
contained in Appendix A.
that were made to the
architectural elevations that
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as
a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility
were displayed at the
with the area's historic structures is not intended to
November 16 meeting.
impose a rigid design solution for new development.
Replication of the design of the important historic sites in
the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's
standard of compatibility can be met through building
scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in
architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional.
The Guidelines allow individuality in design to
accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional
requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows,
doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible
with the forms and features of the significant historic
buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design
guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met
through scale, materials, and forms which may be
embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in
Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale.
Scale should be integral to the building and site design.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building
design should be relieved using design detail or
vegetation, or both.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to
None.
The form, materials and detailing of the proposed apartment
None.
establish a pattern of compatible architectural
buildings are compatible with those of the apartment
characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order
complex to the west. The materials are also compatible with
to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should
the single family residences in the area. The Building 5
demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within
elevations are consistent with the other proposed buildings
the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is
in the development.
substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking
a careful balance between harmonizing new development
with the existing character of the corridor and achieving
compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding
context of buildings.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor
should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a
cohesive whole.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting
None.
The proposed buildings are not physically connected but are
None.
devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within
visually connected through the use of similar forms,
a development.
materials, and design details.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be
None.
Buildings may have been constructed according to the
None.
modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines.
proposed designs in other locations, but the buildings are not
expected to have the appearance of trademark designs.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be
None.
The window glass note has been added to the architectural
None.
highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the
drawings.
Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria:
Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below
40 %. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed
30 %. Specifications on the proposed window glass should
be submitted with the application forfinal review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated
l .Note the height of the
Mechanical units are located at the base of each building,
Revise the plant schedule to
into the overall plan of development and shall, to the
mechanical equipment located
surrounded by an evergreen hedge. Equipment height is 4'.
identify the planting height
extent possible, be compatible with the building designs
at each building. Revise the
A note on the color elevations says that plants are meant to
of screening shrubs, not the
used on the site.
landscape plan and schedule to
identify the screening plants
completely screen the mechanical equipment. Proposed
screening shrubs include yew and cherry laurel, with
container size. Planting
height of shrubs intended to
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from
the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting,
proposed for the equipment.
planting size identified as 3 gallons. The mature height of
screen equipment visible
these features will still have a negative visual impact on the
Ensure that the plants will
the screening shrubs ranges from 3' to 6'. Consequently, the
from the EC should be 4'
Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to
fully screen the equipment
equipment is not likely to be fully screened at planting, and
minimum. Revise plant
eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c.
from view.
possibly may not be fully screened at maturity.
choices accordingly.
Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
f. Above - ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed
16.Applicant has indicated that
Chain link fence is proposed around the pool and the back of
Replace chain link fence
wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices.
satellite dishes will not be
allowed on the building.
the club house. The chain link may be visible from the 5t'
Street EC. Chain link is also proposed around the tot lot
with a more decorative
fence in locations visible
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of
the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may
located between Buildings 3 and 4. This fence would be
from the ECs. Identify the
consist of: a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing.
visible from the 5t1i Street EC. A chain link fence detail is
fence on the plan and
provided on C -02, as are details for guard rail and a
provide a fence detail in the
decorative fence.
plan.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the
2.Add the standard mechanical
The note has been added to L1.03 and Al -00.
None.
architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment
equipment note to both the
from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
architectural and site plans.
Lighting
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over
None.
Spillover does not exceed .5 fc.
None.
onto adjacent properties or streets;
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush - mounted to
3.If exterior building - mounted
Wall- mounted sconce style building lights are proposed.
None.
eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000
lights are proposed, include
They are LED fixtures emitting 1000 lumens.
lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures.
them in the lighting drawings.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate
None.
Light levels are not excessive. The maximum light level is
None.
for display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light
under 12.5 fc.
levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance
Corridors.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a
None.
LED fixtures are proposed throughout the development.
None.
warm soft glow; however, a consistent appearance
throughout a site or development is required.
Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light
are to remain, new lamps may be required to match them.
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors
None.
Bronze poles and fixtures are proposed.
None.
for free - standing pole mounted light fixtures in the
Entrance Corridors.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole- mounted light
None.
The pole detail shows a 16' pole on a 3.5' base.
None.
fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of
the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with
the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding
pole - mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors
should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that
exceed 20 feet in height will typically require additional
screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the
Entrance Corridor.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for
None.
The proposed fixtures appear appropriate for the site.
None.
the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site
will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting
None.
The note is on the plan.
None.
plan: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that
emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff
luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light
away from adjoining residential districts and away from
adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires
onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas
zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle."
Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting
None.
No decorative landscape lighting is proposed.
None.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping
4.Provide the 20 scale
20 scale landscape plans have been provided. Overall site
Shift the one UP located
are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of
landscape plans to cover the
planting and landscaping at each building is detailed.
along the 5t' Street frontage
many of the area's significant historic sites which is
entire development. Be sure all
in the vicinity of Buildings
characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping
utilities and easements are
Most utility conflicts have been resolved. One UP along the
3 and 4 to avoid the water
should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor
shown on the landscape plan.
5' Street frontage in the vicinity of Buildings 3 and 4 is in
line easement.
and help to integrate buildings into the existing
the water line easement. Two BN at the north end of the
environment of the corridor.
5.Check and correct the
quantity of CK and PL in the
parking island located between Buildings 2 and 3 look too
close to the storm pipe. One JV at the east end of the
Shift the two BN at the
north end of the parking
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be
obtained by planting different types of plant materials that
plant schedule and on the plan.
staggered row located south of Building 4 is located on top
island located between
share similar characteristics. Such common elements
of a storm pipe.
Buildings 2 and 3 to
allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
6.Clarify the reason for the
maintain 2' from the storm
because common landscape features will help to
off -site CK located at the west
Plant quantities in the schedule appear to be accurate.
pipe.
harmonize the appearance of development as seen from
end of the 5' Street frontage.
the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
Off -site grading and planting
require easements.
The off -site tree issue has been resolved.
Shift the one JV at the east
end of the staggered row
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor
streets should include the following:
Two trees have been added along 5' Street near the area
located south of Building 4
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the
7.Shift utilities to eliminate
between Buildings 3 and 4. The row now appears more
to maintain 2' from the
Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'/2
conflicts between landscaping
consistent.
storm pipe.
inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and
and utilities /easements without
should be of a plant species common to the area. Such
reducing the quantity of
The slopes down to the apartment buildings from the ECs
trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
proposed plants.
face away from the EC streets and are to be seeded with a
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the
native warm season grass mix. With the proposed EC
area should be interspersed among the trees required by the
8.Add a large shade tree to fill
frontage trees, this treatment is expected to have an
preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not
the gap in street trees between
appropriate appearance.
alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be
buildings 3 and 4, or clarify
planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing
why the gap is required.
pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board
9.Indicate how the landscape
fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align
on the slope down to buildings
the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
3, 4 and 5 from the EC will be
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the
handled.
foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved
parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of
road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
7.Shift utilities to eliminate
The tree /utility conflict at the northern end of the entrance
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior
conflicts between landscaping
drive has been resolved.
roads. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper
and utilities /easements without
(measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a
reducing the quantity of
plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
proposed plants.
located at least every 40 feet on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
None.
Most sidewalks in the development run along the parking
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior
lots, where perimeter trees are provided. A few sidewalks
pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2'/2 inches
run along buildings where trees are not provided, but there
caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should
are sufficient trees elsewhere on site to compensate.
be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be
located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
7.Shift utilities to eliminate
See #7, 8 and 32.
See #7, 8 and 32.
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas,
conflicts between landscaping
located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the
and utilities /easements without
interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10
reducing the quantity of
parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed
proposed plants.
throughout the interior of the parking area.
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should
measure 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the
ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a
species common to the area. Such trees should be planted
in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the
health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the
parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs
should measure 24 inches in height.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
1.Note the height of the
See #17 -19, above.
See #17 -19, above.
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the
mechanical equipment located
front of long buildings as necessary to soften the
at each building. Revise the
appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type
landscape plan and schedule to
of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the
identify the screening plants
length, height, and blankness of such walls.
proposed for the equipment.
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings,
Ensure that the plants will
and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and
fully screen the equipment
structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs.
from view.
Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as
None.
The plants are in the various lists, except for the vitex
None.
approved by the Staff based upon but not limited to the
agnus - castus. This plant is not native, but only four are
Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and
proposed, so the impact is not expected to be significant.
Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the
l O.Limit the number of
The quantity of overall site shrubs meets the 25% rule.
Add a few more shrub
landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall
proposed plants for any one
Some foundation shrubs do not, including the yew, cherry
types to further diversify
be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height;
species to 25% of the total
laurel, and Gro -low sumac. Diversifying these selections
the large numbers of yew,
the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall
proposed for that plant type
would better support the health of the overall landscape.
cherry laurel, and Gro -low
be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health
(tree, shrub).
sumac proposed as
of the plant."
foundation shrubs.
Development paftern and site grading
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing
11.Provide retaining wall
A dry stack masonry unit retaining wall is proposed. A basic
Identify on the plan the
natural landscape and should contribute to the creation of
details on the plans.
retaining wall section has been provided on sheet C -02.
manufacturer and color
an organized development plan. This may be
Manufacturer and color have not been identified.
proposed for the retaining
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the
12.1dentify on the plan top -of-
walls.
trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new
wall and bottom -of -wall
Top of wall and bottom of wall elevations are indicated for
trees along streets and pedestrian ways and choosing
elevations for the retaining
retaining walls, but many have two top of wall heights and
Correct top of wall and
species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that
walls.
those in the vicinity of the clubhouse seem inaccurate.
bottom of wall elevations
any grading will blend into the surrounding topography
for the retaining walls.
thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the
l O.Limit the number of
extent practical, existing significant river and stream
proposed plants for any one
valleys which may be located on the site and integrating
species to 25% of the total
these features into the design of surrounding development;
proposed for that plant type
and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that
(tree, shrub).
does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the
Entrance Corridor.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the
Entrance Corridor street and to other development within
the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths,
and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor
street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings
should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent
pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to
provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including
creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock
outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural
features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County
Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by
that section should be located so as to maximize the use of
existing features in screening such improvements from
Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect
existing views and vistas on and around the site.
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the
site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of
retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the use of
smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable.
Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with
a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than
engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and
taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend
with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the
13.Coordinate the tree save
The tree save /grading conflict has been resolved by
None.
drip line of any trees or other existing features designated
and grading shown south of
eliminating the trees in question.
for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness.
the clubhouse.
Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and
erosion and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate
of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and
protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the
site. This protection should remain in place until
completion of the development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or
movement of heavy equipment within this area.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be
None.
The development will use the stormwater facility that exists
None.
designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need
at the west end of the property.
for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor
street, these features must be fully integrated into the
landscape. They should not have the appearance of
engineered features.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new
drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished
site to the extent possible.
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The appearance and level of detail of Building 5
2. Chain link fence proposed in the vicinity of the clubhouse and Buildings 3 and 4
3. Screening shrubs /mechanical equipment
Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness, pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions:
1. Revise the plant schedule to identify the planting height of screening shrubs, not the container size. Planting height of shrubs intended to screen equipment visible from the EC.should be 4'
minimum.
2. Replace chain link fence with a more decorative fence in locations visible from the ECs. Identify the fence on the plan and provide a fence detail in the plan.
3. Shift the one UP located along the 5t1i Street frontage in the vicinity of Buildings 3 and 4 to avoid the water line easement.
4. Shift the two BN at the north end of the parking island located between Buildings 2 and 3 to maintain 2' from the storm pipe.
5. Shift the one JV at the east end of the staggered row located south of Building 4 to maintain 2'from the storm pipe.
6. Add a few more shrub types to further diversify the large numbers of yew, cherry laurel, and Gro -low sumac proposed as foundation shrubs.
7. Identify on the plan the manufacturer and color proposed for the retaining walls.
8. Correct top of wall and bottom of wall elevations for the retaining walls.
10
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
C -02 of 34
General Notes & Typical Details
7/31/2015
L3.03
Parking Lot Lighting Plan
12/7/15
C -02C of 34
Dumpster and Recycle Center
7/31/2015
L3.04
Lighting Cut Sheets
12/7/15
C -02C of 34
Dumpster and recycle Center
7/31/2015
Al -00
Architectural Site Plan
12/7/15
C -09A of 34
Grading and Drainage Plan
7/31/2015
Al -01
Building Type 1 — First Floor Plan
12/7/15
C -09B of 34
Grading and Drainage Plan
7/31/2015
Al -05
Building Type 3 — First Floor Plan
12/7/15
C -09C of 34
Grading and Drainage Plan
7/31/2015
Al -09
Building Type 3 — First Floor Plan
12/7/15
C -09D of 34
Grading and Drainage Plan
7/31/2015
Al -14
Building #5 — Type 4 LVL 1 Plan
12/7/15
L0.0
Site Context
12/7/15
A5 -01
Elev - Building Type 1
12/7/15
L1.01
Overall Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -02
Elevations — Building Type 2 (900 & 1100)
12/7/15
L1.02
Site Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -03A
Elevations — Building Type 3
12/7/15
L1.03
Site Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -03B
Elevations — Building Type 3
12/7/15
L1.04
Site Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -04A
Elevations — Building Type 4
12/7/15
L1.05
Site Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -04B
Elevations — Building Type 4
12/7/15
L1.06
Site Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -04C
Elevations — Building Type 4
12/7/15
L1.07
Clubhouse Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -04D
Elevations — Building Type 4
12/7/15
L1.08
Building 1 Planting Plan
12/7/15
A5 -05
Elevs — Bldg. Type 1 & 2
12/7/15
L1.09
Building 2 and Bioretention Planting Plan
12/7/15
EL -01
Building #1 — Type 3 — North Elevation (color)
12/7/15
L1.10
Building 3 Planting Plan
12/7/15
EL -02
Building #2 — type 2 — North Elevation (color)
12/7/15
L1.11
Building 4 Planting Plan
12/7/15
EL -03
Building #3 and 4 — Type 1 — Street Elevation (color)
12/7/15
L1.12
Building 5 Planting Plan
12/7/15
EL -04
Building #5 — Type 4 — Southwest Elevation (color)
12/7/15
L1.13
Building 5 Planting Plan
12/7/15
EL -05
Building #5 — Type 4 — South Elevation (color)
12/7/15
L2.01
Plant Schedule, Calculations, & Details
12/7/15
EL -06
Building #5 — Type 4 — Southeast Elevation (color)
12/7/15
L3.01
Overall Lighting Plan
12/7/15
L0.00
Site Context (color)
12/7/15
L3.02
Parking Lot Lighting Plan
12/7/15
11
ATTACHMENT A
COUNTY OFALBEM.A.RLE
Depai imea I of Comoro pity DeTelDpm Ent
4 D 131 1IMIXe Ru ed. NaTth Wmg
CberIoItesvj0e.1jFZL11LB
1-li (134) 29d-8831 FBI (434) 4 12-1126
July22.2015
Michael M Cam pbelVDom iniom Realty Partners
109 N 5th Street, Suite B
RichnnDnd Va23219
RE:ARB2015O.DH r;ft• St•eet Place
Dear Mr. Ca') eb= .
T h a Albe Y, zle --.- - n:p mrch :ect- f 9 R =v =t; 5o rd a: its ae7in ; - n , j', 2 :. =1` cc r: le:ed re,, c�, - [:he
above •o7ad - =qi 7o cc- =_:r.:: i- 17 If A Si I r sis I -; c' 2:: a - = re 1: 1 - Is I L d •;s "im h
z -- =:, - t_ - M7a r :,*,. a Y - - t= _T 1- Boa•: o`e : 71- e •; - - r, i- e 17- `c-:he : ="e' 7 ` I -__app cam s next
- . -1- 71 = 1. = lea -- - --:e 71)a7 71- e`.: :-t;ir g : - r- e i7s as t- ose 71ha: - b- = r r 7if =d z: :h, i 7ii- C !,: is dial
cc n r e Iss mays addE : -_ r slim I eta: ba me, on f. al- a E, s i, a i ang :c t- a pla -.
1. Note the •eig6t-f:henrecharioal equipnnenlloaa:e, Bleach build irp. Re jis,e the landsc=ape plan and
E, I ed_ln7c screening plants proposed for the equipment. lEAsurelhatilreplants willfully
711- -:L :'1 =n: NDM VFeW.
2 -7ai:-J, Y-- .in ca e:uipii an: "ote !c :V• ts 9,-1-itact.ral 39 = 7e pia•s.
I Ex 7a' :' :u I - g1 - L Te its a — *fo: --< ed r olu, = : i = •:r : t 7ir g d "g i
4. P--, --e I -e -0 scale p z-s 7c ao•ar the entire davalo:inaw. 311 LAit ss end
are Jo.,i o- 711-_ z• -_ :lan.
5. ChE- Bi- -re,- 71h- _-i7: c=0, and PL in the plant schedule and on Ire plan.
D. Gla-I.- - im s_-- :-- -1-e _--i =- --a ted at the west end uF the 6' Street frontage. Dif-site
gradin- a -d pa-I-; re.- ire ea==re--s.
T. S11117. it III == --- e ri •3-- -r'liotm between Landscaping and uhli Jeasements without reducing
the qj-rti.- :f : -op—d3- :s
S. Ad: E -rg- si--e tree to the gap in stri trees between buildings 3and 4, or clarify why the
gap -L =1
P. I rdica-e I) : •,. the landscape on the slope down to buildings 3. 4 and 5 from the EG will be handled.
10 L m : 1•m ru ii_n- ol pnapD5ed plants For anyone 5piecksto 25% of the total proposed For that plant
t, = =_
1 P-:,:erE73--gr;-Ildeia'son the pans.
3 Coo- iio z -1-e ueE save 3-: gra❑ rg cl-own soil -h _dlc L-e.
P--, -e 31= =m--io sh- .,. -a the buildirg p,--r t-po,ra_-�y 37 m3oh --Ond' t-e
p•ire-e- --f 1-e sii= I ^at r•onts on an Err-ia•, Co _-c- : =-5pec7P;= -.0 c oe 'Ed in
d^_- be t•a ip c s :L I -n, 'e EC
Feo :0 :e T"a - :C-�
-2 ev-.ton�o- __ild-� Z 171eez, =,-: :,rand=: pcee-7edz7
inaedrig.Allbu
d-:a .
15 --plkBm has indicated That satellite dishes will no: be all"E- on the building
17 P evisad drawings addressing k 14 and 15 may return for a work sesaaon.
You may submit your application for conlin. ad ARE] ffiVieW at Your earliest convenience. Application forrins,
checklists and schedules are available on-1 i= -t wwwalbemarle.orgiARD.
Rsv:Ee' d-aVirgs ad: reEsing t-e oommanu ad a:ce z requ:'. include u:dated AR revi=:c" '3tsE on
=-.011 p a e T.: I .
ri j:irg :e7a rd :a:-: ): a 9�) -I- T I Fqs -Een
add- aces:, .1-coangem :,L-ai dhar trose have _ ae- rad=. zarlfy L-_=a -_ iaryes it Lia ri air o a So.
HUhlignting the cnange5 in the draviing Ymh 'cloud in g' or Dy ctner mean E will fac_ilitatE . -_w.siv and app rova I.
IF you have any questions concerning any of the above, please FEEA free to call me.
Sincerely.
li Vlaliszewski
Pdnc*al Planner
Cc: Gambit LLC & Snow Pam LLC
Po Box W4a
Charlottesville Va 22905
File
12