Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201500051 Correspondence 2015-10-05 Now Joseph Associates LLC 481 Clarks Tract Keswick,Virginia,22947 October 5, 2015 Christopher Perez Albemarle County Senior Planner 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 Re: SDP-201500003 All Saints Chapel Response to September 24,2015 Initial Site Plan Comments Dear Mr. Perez, Response to the comments in the September 24,2015 letter are listed below: Albemarle County Planning Services 1. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. The checklist attached to the site plan application has been completed. We have not included a benchmark for elevation. Because this is Engineering Policy we request that Engineering waive this policy because of the small scale of the site improvements proposed. The topo used for the site was taken from the Albemarle County topo flown in 2013. 2. The location of the stones (possible grave stones) are within relative close proximity to the proposed construction work. On the final site plan assure these areas are protected by protective fencing. This has been done 3. Currently the initial site plan depicts the proposed entrance to the site traversing a small portion of the neighboring property's front yard (TMP 04800-00-00-019E0);however the entrance to the site shall be located completely on the Church property or an easement shall be granted by/recorded on the neighboring parcel. Prior to final site plan approval an offsite easement shall be granted by the owners of TMP 04800-00-019EO for the Church's proposed entrance, OR a Boundary Line Adjustment shall take place between the two properties to relocate the entire entrance on the Church property while maintaining a minimum of 130' frontage for TMP 04800-00-019E0 as required in the VR district. The easement language has been reviewed by the coun y staff; a plat will be submitted to illustrate the proposed easement. 4. As depicted the aisle widths adjacent to the parking spaces scale out at 19'wide; however they truly need to be 20'wide at a minimum. Assure this is corrected on the final site plan.Also, the parking spaces proposed to scale out to be 9'wide;however, for a 20' aisle with they are required to be 10'wide. The parking area is dimensioned to provide for a 18' long parking space and a 20' travelway and measures 38' as required by ordinance standards, the graphic representation of the parking widths has been revised to illustrate a 10' wide parking space and dimensions remain as illustrating a typical width for the spaces, total length of the parking area measures 66'. 5. Zoning. On sheet 3 of the final site plan under the gravel parking waiver note,please add the following note for the other waiver that was approved: "18'wide access aisle near the entrance has been permitted for this site pursuant to Section 4.12.2c of the County Code as it has been determined the modification would equally or better serve the public health, safety or welfare." This note has been added. 6. On the site plan TMP 48— 19E is listed as AG/forest;however this property is not located in an AG Forest District. Please remove this labeling, or provide proof it is located in this district. The label has been removed. 7. Prior to final site plan approval assure the approval date of SP2015-7 is provided on the site plan as well as the following conditions of approval: This has been added. 8. Groundwater Tier I Assessment. Per direction from the County Engineering staff a Tier I Groundwater Assessment is required prior to approval of final site plan. This requires drilling a well. Well drilling is scheduled. 9. Virginia Department of Health approval of septic permit is required prior to final site plan approval. Please submit 3 copies of the soil work to Planning Staff and these will be forwarded to the Health Department for review with the final site plan. These are attached. 10. Being this site is located in the Entrance Corridor (EC), approval from the Architectural Review Board (ARB) is required prior to final site plan approval. Information requested by the ARB has been submitted to the Design Planner. 11. Entrances.VDOT approval shall be required prior to final site plan approval. Entrance has been designed to VDOT standards. 12. The following will also be required for final site plan approval: If any outdoor lighting is proposed—Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location,description,and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire. Note added indicating that NO outdoor lighting is proposed. A complete landscape plan in accordance with (Sec. 7.9) Landscape plan has been included. Landscaping using existing trees preliminarily approved by Design Planner. Nor., .wire Architectural Review Board 1. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. This is understood. 2. Indicate existing and proposed materials and colors on the elevation drawing. New materials and colors shall be compatible with those of the historic chapel. This has been added. 3. Add the standard equipment note to the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." Because the mechanical equipment proposed consists of a beat pump located on the ground behind the building and illustrated on the final plan, with the same note on the final site plan, this note has not been placed on the architectural plan. 4. If site or exterior building lighting is proposed, show it on the plan and ensure that all related ordinance requirements are met. A note has been added to the plan indicating that NO outdoor lighting is proposed. ARB comments concerning a grading permit 1. Include the signed conservation checklist on the site plan. Check the boxes that apply. This has been added. 2. No grading shall begin until all the trees to be saved are marked and protected with fencing. This has been checked on the Conservation Checklist. Engineering Division 1. Is the entrance encroaching another property?Please provide an access easement if it is on another property. The deed language has been submitted. 2. The edge of the parking near the stub out is 533.25. Show a 2:1 or 3:1 slope to the 532 contour line. If steeper than 3:1 is used, show low maintenance groundcover (not grass) on the landscaping plan. Drawing has been revised to illustrate a 3:1 or greater slope from the parking area. 3. Delineate the limits of disturbance and label to match the 8,085 SF on notes. The disturbed areas have been delineated. The drainfield area has been relocated. The disturbed area has increased taking into account the grading required to construct the parking area. It now measures 9,244 square feet. "olor *mow 4. Show unobstructed sight distance lines at the entrance. This has been added. 5. Shift handicap parking sign to be behind bumper block so it's in front of parking space. Drawing has been revised, sign moved, and note added to plan clarifying location of handicap sign. 6. Label trees "to be removed"within travelway and parking area. This information is located on the landscape plan. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, C is Jo,eph Cc: A. C. Shackelford s Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:42 PM To: 'Marcia Joseph' Subject: All Saints Chapel - Easement Plat Marcia, All Saints Chapel- Easement Plat I have contacted the County Attorney about his guidance on the deed language and the applicant's suggestion that he previously weighed in that a deed will suffice in place of a plat. Greg affirms he did not weigh in on whether or not a plat was required during his review of the deed; rather, he merely reviewed the proposed easement termination language in the deed and determined it presented no County issues. In an effort to assure you that an easement plat is required I brought Megan Yaniglos—Principle Planner into the discussion and she also believes that an easement plat is required for this situation. Please note that the deed your clients already spent time and money on can be modified to reference the easement plat and eventually recorded w/the plat. Note the plat will need to be applied for, submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County before it can be recorded. Once the easement plat is recorded the final site plan will need to be revised to provide the deed book and page reference number of the recorded easement plat. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks Christopher P. Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle. Virginia 4W McIntire Road 1Charlottes ille. VA 22902 434.296.5532 ext. 3443 From: Christopher Perez Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:32 PM To:Greg Kamptner<GKamptne @albemarle.org> Subject:All Saints Chapel- Easement Plat Greg, All Saints Chapel I'm working with the applicants of the above referenced project on submitting their final site plan and they insist that per your guidance from 9-21-15 (email below) that they do not need to submit an Easement Plat associated with the portion of their required access which crosses over Dovedale LLC land; rather, they believe a Deed which provides an exhibit from the site plan will suffice as you previously reviewed their deed and said 'the easement doc is OK as,far as the County is concerned'. Both Megan Yaniglos and I feel that the ordinance calls for an easement plat(see attached doc for ordinance sections). After I read your email that they are standing by, it appears that you may have only reviewed the deed language in relation to what happens after the land is no longer used as a church; rather, it is not clear that you provided any guidance as to whether an easement plat was required. 1 } Please weigh in on the above Thanks Christopher P. Peres Senior Planner Department of Com niunity Development (County of Albemarle,Virginia 4111 McIntire Road l Charlottesville,VA 229112 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: GKamptne(a�albemarle.org To: Shackelfordl(a�aol.com Sent: 8/21/2015 3:41:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: RE: Question for Mr. Kamptner Mr. Shackelford- The easement document is OK as far as the County is concerned. In particular, the termination provision does not pose any issues for the County because the proposed special use permit condition that triggers the need for the easement applies only while the special use (the church use) exists on the property. Greg Kamptner Deputy County Attorney County of Albemarle gkamptner @albemarle.org (434) 972-4067 x3268 From:Shackelford)@aol.com [mailto:Shackelfordl @aol.com] Sent: Friday,August 21, 2015 12:04 PM To:Greg Kamptner<GKamptne @albemarle.org> Subject:Question for Mr. Kamptner Dear Mr. Kamptner: I am writing in reference to a Special Use Permit submission dated June 1, 2015 (SP 201500007)for an addition to All Saints Chapel, which is located at Stony Point. The Planning Commission recently approved the submission, and it will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on September 2. I am an attorney and a member of Dovedale, LLC, which owns the property that is adjacent to the chapel. My purpose in writing is to consult with you as to the wording of an easement for an entrance to the chapel. The Planning Commission has asked that Dovedale, LLC grant an easement so the chapel's entrance will qualify as a commercial (low-volume)entrance, with 20-foot radii. The easement is necessary because the chapel's entrance is very close to the boundary line of the LLC's land, and the 20-foot radius on the eastern side of the entrance will encroach slightly on the LLC's land. There is an unusual situation with the chapel property that may affect the wording of the easement. The chapel property was donated to the church in 1922 by my ancestors, who owned the property as part of a family farm. A few years ago, Dovedale, LLC was created to hold title to the farm.The deed from the Shackelfords to the church's trustees states: "Should said property cease to be used for the purpose of worship for a longer period than five years, then the real estate hereby conveyed shall revert to the estate of said W.C. Shackelford." In the event that someday the chapel property ceases to be used for worship and reverts back to Dovedale, LLC (whose members are the surviving beneficiaries of W.C. Shackelford's estate), the LLC members would like to have the easement terminate at that point. That would protect the LLC from having a commercial entrance on its boundary if the LLC were to later sell the lot to another owner. A new owner would then have to negotiate for a new easement in case the new owner wanted to use the property for a commercial purpose; i.e., 2 something other than a typical residence. Again, that would protect the LLC from being forced to accept some type of commercial enterprise (other than a church) so close to the LLC's boundary. Attached is a draft of an easement for your review, along with a copy of the original 1922 deed. I would be grateful if you could read the draft easement and let me know if it looks OK from your perspective. If you require any additional information, please let me know. I will be glad to discuss this by phone or in person if that would be helpful to you. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Alfred C. Shackelford, Ill 3733 Stony Point Pass Keswick, VA 22947 Home: (434)973-1693 Office: (434)817-6574 ext. 148 Shackelford 1 @aol.com 3 war -we Christopher Perez From: Marcia Joseph<marcia481@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 9:28 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: Fwd: All Saints Chapel Attachments: All Saints Chapel Approval Letter(VDH ID 101-15-0490).pdf Wanted to make sure that you had received this too. Begin forwarded message: From: "Kirtley; Joshua (VDH)" <Joshua.Kirtle • vdh.vir•in'.. .o Subject: RE: All Saints Chapel Date: November 10, 2015 at 9:17:23 AM EST To: Marcia Joseph <marcia481@earthlink.net> Cc: "Batten, Teresa (VDH)" <Teresa.Batten @vdh.virginia.gov>, "Willetts, .ss (VDH)" t <Tess.Willetts(a�vdh.virginia.gov>, Jeff Loth <jeff.lothyahoo.com> arcia: PI se see the attached pdf of the approval letter for the above mentioned project. Let me kno if you have any questions or concerns. Josh 4,pAul From: Kirtley, Joshua DH) Sent: Tuesday, November • 2015 9:12 AM To: 'Marcia Joseph' Subject: RE: All Saints Chapel Working on it now...no power at home last night so couldn't get it done then. Will follow up later this morning. From: Marcia Joseph [mailto:marcia481 @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 8:44 AM To: Kirtley, Joshua (VDH) Subject: All Saints Chapel Josh, Just wondered if you have had a chance to release the permits for the well and septic for All Saints. Thanks, for your help. Marcia 1 111111110 *4811/0 Marcia Joseph Joseph Associates LLC 481 Clarks Tract Keswick,Virginia 22947 phone 434-984-4199 cell 434-996-1572 marcia451(a earthlmk.nct Marcia Joseph Joseph Associates LLC 481 Clarks Tract Keswick,Virginia 22947 phone 434-984-4199 cell 434-996-1572 marcia48I(r earthlink.net 2 Imo 'NW Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: • Thursday, October 29, 2015 7:00 AM To: 'Marcia Joseph' Cc: 'A. C. Shackelford, Jr.' Subject: RE: SDP2015-51 All Saints Chapel—final site plan. Attachments: 10-29-15_CD1 SDP2015-51 All Saints Chapel—final site plan.pdf Marcia, Attached are the comments for SDP2015-51 All Saints Chapel—final site plan. Attached I have provided a revised comment letter, with revision date. Reason being, I added a single comment #16 this morning to request an update/modification to the title to the site plan. All other comments remain unchanged from the letter I sent you yesterday. Please utilize this as the official letter, it has been updated in Countyview. Thanks Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development 1County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road!Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From:Christopher Perez Sent:Wednesday,October 28, 2015 5:26 PM To: 'Marcia Joseph'<marcia481 @earthlink.net> Cc: 'A. C.Shackelford,Jr.'<dovedalel @aol.com> Subject:SDP2015-51 All Saints Chapel—final site plan. Marcia, Attached are the comments for SDP2015-51 All Saints Chapel—final site plan. Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road'Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 1 Christopher Perez From: Christopher Perez Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:30 PM To: 'Marcia Joseph' Subject: RE: All Saints Chapel Final Site Plan Marcia, Sounds good. I am off tomorrow due to the holiday but the office will be open, you can drop the extra copies off. The office will be closed for the holiday on Thursday and Friday,regular business shall commence on Monday. SRC signers have 10 days to sign the plans once ready for signature, typically they take 5 days to get it done. Thanks Christopher P. Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development !County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Marcia Joseph [mailto:marcia481 @earthlink.net] Sent:Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:12 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez @albemarle.org> Cc:Corkey Shackleford <dovedalel @aol.com>;Justin Deel<jdeel @albemarle.org> Subject: Re: All Saints Chapel Final Site Plan Christopher, I will drop those copies off tomorrow! Thank you! Marcia On Dec 22, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Christopher Perez <cperez(ct�albemarle.org>wrote: Marcia, SDP2015-51 All Saints Chapel—fmal site plan The above referenced plan is ready for approval. County Engineering& Planning staff reviewed the above referenced plan without marking on the revised final. Thus we have 2 approvable copies ready for signature; however, we need a total of 4 copies for approval. Please submit a minimum of 2 additional signed/sealed plan sets for County approval/signature. Thanks Christopher P. Petez Senior Planner 1 IOW 1110 Department of Community Development County of Albemarle, Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 2291)2 434296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Marcia Joseph [mailto:marcia481 @earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 3:23 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org> Cc:Corkey Shackleford <dovedalel @aol.com>;Justin Deel<ideel @albemarle.org> Subject: Re: All Saints Chapel Final Site Plan Many thanks! On Dec 18, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org> wrote: Marcia, Comments are due by Dec 23'd. Ifs next on my list to get to. I hope to knock it out on Monday. I'ye CCed .Tustin too. Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner Department of Community Development)County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434296.5832 ext. 3443 From: Marcia Joseph [mailto:marcia481 @earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 3:06 PM To:Christopher Perez<cperez @albemarle.org> Cc:Corkey Shackleford <dovedalel@aol.com> Subject:All Saints Chapel Final Site Plan Christopher, Do you think it is possible for us to receive the review comments concerning our latest site plan submittal before the end of the year? Thanks, Marcia Joseph Joseph Associates LLC 481 Clarks Tract Keswick,Virginia 22947 phone 434-984-4199 cell 434-996-1572 marcia48 I(a earthl ink.net Marcia Joseph Joseph Associates LLC 481 Clarks Tract Keswick,Virginia 22947 2 phone 434-984-4199 cell 434-996-1572 marcia48I(a earthlink.net Marcia Joseph Joseph Associates LLC 481 Clarks Tract Keswick,Virginia 22947 phone 434-984-4199 cell 434-996-1572 marcia481@earthlink.net 3