Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201300044 Other 2013-08-02 Johnathan Newberry From: Ron Higgins Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 9:59 AM To: Scott Collins Cc: Johnathan Newberry; David Hilliard Subject: FW: Old Trail Block 1&2 final parking analysis Attachments: Old Trail Parking Analysis BLock 1&2.pdf Hello,Scott: I have reviewed your latest Parking Analysis (dated June 30,2013)for the Old Trail Village Blocks 1&2 parking and approved this reduction in parking and the shared parking between Blocks 1&2 as outlined in that analysis. This represents just under an 18%reduction which is within the 35%acceptable range as specified in Section 4.12.10 of the zoning ordinance. This is justified by the variety of uses proposed as well as the different times of parking need for the uses. This replaces any prior parking determinations for Blocks 1&2,Old Trail Village. One minor edit to the Analysis is that Block 1 is East of Old Trail Drive instead of West(paragraph 1 under`Block 1" of Summary). Ron Higgins,AICP Chief of Zoning/Deputy Zoning Administrator 1 PARKING ANALYSIS BLOCKS 1 AND 2 OLD TRAIL VILLAGE June 30, 2013 COLLINS Old Trail Village Blocks I&2 Parking Analysis Summary of proposed development BLOCK 1 Block 1, located along the west side of Old Trail Drive,between the two roundabouts, is considered the heart of the Village Center at Old Trail. This block will consist of two phases of mixed use buildings with commercial/retail spaces along with residential apartments and townhome units. While a range of uses are allowed by the code of development for Old Trail Village, some assumptions can be made based on anticipated market conditions and existing leased space. The following is a breakdown of the anticipated uses for each of the buildings within block 1: Block 1 Uses Building 1: • residential apartment units • restaurant/commercial/retail space • office space • athletic facility/health club Building 2: • residential units and townhouse units • restaurant/commercial/retail space • office space BLOCK 2 Block 2 will be occupied by a retirement facility serving some residents in a congregate care environment, while other areas will be devoted to a rest home/nursing home/convalescent home. A 4-story hotel with a small restaurant is also proposed at the southwest corner of the block. The following summarizes the uses in Block 2: Block 2 Uses • 67 residential units devoted to a multi-family congregate care facility for the elderly • 56 beds devoted to rest home/nursing home/convalescent home • 21 employees maximum, during a given shift to serve residents of both components of the facility • 52 room Hotel with a 1,900 sf restaurant II. Parking Required Block 1 consists of residential apartments and commercial space of varying uses. With at least 4 distinct uses under consideration, analyzing shared parking becomes more complex. To model the parking scenario anticipated for this block, we have based the parking ratio on a shopping center square footage basis for the commercial/retail uses (since the total square footage exceeds 50,000 sf) and added in the residential parking for the overall units within the block. Both the commercial shopping center parking and the residential parking calculations are based on the parking requirements as set forth in the Albemarle County zoning regulations. The block 2 parking is based on the Albemarle County zoning regulations for the uses of the Hotel building, Restaurant, and the Retirement facility. Old Trail Village Blocks I &2 Parking Analysis PARKING REQUIRED: BLOCK 1: Phase 1 Phase 2 Req'd parking Residential Units 34 18 99 spaces Restaurant/Retail 25,154 sf 26,860 sf 247 spaces (Shopping Center) 4.75 spaces/ 1000 sf Townhouses 0 7 16 spaces TOTAL 362 BLOCK 2: Lot 1 Lodge Lot 2—Hotel Req'd parking at Old Trail Hotel(1 space/room) 0 52 52 Hotel Restaurant(13 0 1,900 25 spaces/1000 sf) Congregate Care Units 67 units 0 23 (1 space/3 beds) Assisted Living Beds 56 beds 0 14 (1 space/4 beds) Senior Housing 21 0 21 Employees employees TOTAL 135 TOTAL PARKING DEMAND BETWEEN BLOCKS 1 &2: 362+ 135 =497 SPACES III. Parking Provided PARKING PROVIDED: Block# Surface Spaces Garage Spaces/ On-street Total Spaces driveways Spaces 1 185 21 19 225 2 86 78 19 183 Total spaces 271 99 38 408 provided for Blocks 1 and 2 Summary: Total required spaces per zoning ordinance for Block 1 &2: 497 spaces Total provided spaces on Block 1&2: 408 spaces Deficit: 89 spaces Percentage of reduction: 497—408 = 18% shared 497 of • �!iiriii 8 UQ�* ms 's: VP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ------ - - ------ — Department of Community Development 4ofMeintireZtoad, ortti Wing — —— -- — —— — Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 December 27, 2011 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Old Trail Block 3-SDP2011-45-Shared Parking Approval Dear Mr. Collins: You provided a parking analysis on September 6, 2011 for Block 3, Phases A, B, C & D which I approved in late September via email. This letter serves to reconfirm that approval. The latest analysis supports the provision of 209 total parking spaces with a shared parking ratio of 5.5%, which is well within the 35% maximum specified in Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.10-Shared Parking. This would accommodate the following: Phase A-pool and adjacent parking lot containing 72 spaces Phase B-25 townhouse units providing 52 spaces Phase C-20 townhouse units providing 40 spaces and 10,900 square feet of office providing 9 spaces Phase D-4 single family detached lots containing 8 spaces Claremont Lane-19 parallel spaces Brookley Drive-9 parallel spaces. Although the required parking for these uses total 220.85 spaces, your rationale provided in the parking analysis and breakdown of provided spaces by phase is acceptable. Additionally, Staff has required that. you note on the Parking Analysis Chart for Phase C the requirement that employees of the commercial building be designated to park in the pool parking lot as stated in your correspondence. Please contact me should you have any questions on this information. Sincerely, ICI Sarah '. Baldwin Senior Planner, acting on behalf of the Zoning Administrator Copy: File: SDP2011-45, Megan Yaniglos, Senior Planner