HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201400046 Review Comments Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2016-01-13Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201400046
SubApplication Type:
Christian Aid Mission - Major
Major Amendment
Date Completed:07/18/2014
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CD
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:07/21/2014
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. Show on the plan the easements associated with the overhead utilities located along Broomley
Road.
2. Provide 2½” caliper trees of a species common to the area, outside of easements, in an informal
arrangement near the entrance drive, to help integrate the drive into the surroundings. Trees shall be
equivalent in quantity to 40’ on center, along both sides of the entrance drive.
3. Add the plant health note to the plan: “All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to
reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall
be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.”
4. Revise the plan to show all the existing trees at the southwest corner of the site.
5. Clarify the tree line north of the proposed drive to more accurately distinguish between tree line
and scrub.
6. Show tree protection fencing on the plan.
Division:
Date Completed:07/21/2014
Reviewer:Josh Kirtley Health Department
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:07/01/2014
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:06/16/2014
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated June 9, 2014.
No comments or conditions.
Division:
Date Completed:07/10/2014
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 6/9/14
No comments or objections
Division:
Date Completed:07/14/2014
Reviewer:Troy Austin VDOTDivision:
Page:1of4 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 13, 2016
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:06/30/2014
Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineering
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:This is what was recommended with the special use permit, in order to obtain access to the signal,
and a safer left turn movement onto Rt. 250.
Division:
Date Completed:06/19/2014
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:Approved.
Division:
Date Completed:06/30/2014
Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineering
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:These slopes are road ditches and shoulder. Disturbance is necessary to establish a safer entrance.
Division:
Date Completed:07/24/2014
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CD
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Per the applicants request I discussed the landscaping comments with Zoning and they have
provided guidance which modified two of the landscaping comments (#8 and 9). Attached are revised
comments post SRC meeting.
Division:
Date Completed:08/27/2014
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CD
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:09/03/2014
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans revised August 26, 2014.
No comments or conditions.
Division:
Date Completed:09/02/2014
Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineering
Review Status:Planning Commission Waiver Approval
Reviews Comments:This plan appears to be what the board requested, so I must recommend approval with the condition
that signage ("no left turn", channelization signs, stop signs, etc.) be provided with the island.
However, for record, this solution was not recommended. These islands do not work. To see
evidence of this, one has only to observe the cars driving around the island recently installed in the
entrance of the Treesdale complex on Rio Road. The only way to prohibit left turns out of an
entrance is to install a median in the road.
Division:
Date Completed:09/08/2014
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:“The ACSA is proposing a PRV vault and associated water main along the frontage of the property.
The proposed ACSA infrastructure should be shown on the plan and called out as Proposed ACSA
Project #2012-12. The design engineer should have a digital copy of the plan already. If another is
Division:
Page:2of4 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 13, 2016
needed please have him contact me directly. Thank you. “
Date Completed:08/30/2014
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 8/26/14
No comments or objections
Division:
Date Completed:09/05/2014
Reviewer:Troy Austin VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:09/08/2014
Reviewer:Josh Kirtley Health Department
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
From: Kirtley, Joshua (VDH) [mailto:Joshua.Kirtley@vdh.virginia.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 10:07 AM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: RE: SDP2014-46 Major Amendment - Christian Aid Mission
Chris:
Provided that the proposed entrance does not impact the existing septic system or reserve area, then
I am comfortable with the proposal. I would tend to think that working from the existing entrance on
250 would minimize the chances for disturbance, but I am dependant on the PE and site plan
developer to know where the septic system is located and to maintain the correct setback.
If you would like to sign for me, that is fine. If you wish, I could also stop by to sign the plan once
everything is ready. Makes no difference to me.
Josh Kirtley
Environmental Health Technical Consultant
Onsite Sewage and Water Programs
Thomas Jefferson Health District
1138 Rose Hill Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Office (434) 972-6288
Division:
Date Completed:08/27/2014
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:8-27-14_discussed the revised plan with her, bc the broomley road entrance is off the table and no
changes are happening outside the existing entrance pavement she has no objections.
Division:
Date Completed:09/08/2014
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CD
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:No objections, all my comments have been addressed in the PDF copy sent on 9-2-14.
Division:
Date Completed:09/10/2014
Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineering
Review Status:Planning Commission Approval
Reviews Comments:I have no new comments regarding this entrance.
Division:
Page:3of4 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 13, 2016
Date Completed:09/18/2014
Reviewer:Troy Austin VDOT
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:09/18/2014
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
From: Alex Morrison [mailto:amorrison@serviceauthority.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 3:47 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: RE: SDP2014-46 Major Amendment - Christian Aid Mission
Chris,
I have reviewed the revisions to the above referenced application. The ACSA has no further
comments. I hereby recommend approval of the application.
Alexander J. Morrison, EIT
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(O) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116
(F) 434-979-0698
Division:
Date Completed:10/23/2014
Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Signs should reference MUTCD standards R4-7, R3-2 and R1-1. They should not be combined on
the same post. Hardware should be break away posts to VDOT standard.
Division:
Date Completed:11/12/2014
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CD
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:12/10/2014
Reviewer:Christopher Perez CD
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:11/12/2014
Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineering
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Page:4of4 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 13, 2016