HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201500031 Review Comments 2015-07-10Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201500031
SubApplication Type:
CMA Properties - Final
Final Site Development Plan
Date Completed:07/10/2015
Reviewer:Rachel Falkenstein Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:07/16/2015
Reviewer:Max Greene Engineering
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:VSMP WPO201500025 will need to be approved prior to final site plan approval.
Division:
Date Completed:07/12/2015
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 6/17/15
No comments or objections
Division:
Date Completed:07/20/2015
Reviewer:Troy Austin
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/12/2015
Reviewer:Rachel Falkenstein Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/31/2015
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:The ACSA has granted construction approval and signed the signature set for the final site plan. I
hereby recommend approval of SDP201500031.
Division:
Date Completed:08/24/2015
Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/25/2015
Reviewer:Troy Austin VDOT
Review Status:Pending
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/12/2015
Reviewer:Max Greene Engineering
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:VSMP WPO201500025 will need to be approved prior to final site plan approval. Please see
Division:
Page:1of2 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 19, 2016
WPO201500025 for additional information.
Date Completed:08/13/2015
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/13/2015
Reviewer:Rachel Falkenstein Planning
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Page:2of2 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 19, 2016
r ,f
Now' Nor?
1,1 11
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville,VA,22902
Phone 434-296-5832 Fax 434-972-4126
Memorandum
To: Pete Borches,CMA Properties (pborches @cmacars.com
From: Rachel Falkenstein,Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: July 10, 2015
Rev 1 Plan date: 8/3/2015
Rev 1 Comments:8/12/2015
Subject: SDP 201500031 CMA Properties—Final Site Development Plan
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further
review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference,which is to the Subdivision/Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Conditions of final approval:
• -�t {r.+. ;nR .;s. .;r; -.rte;Y mac; •yr -.{� ,i, c; _rr,.r .t,
-r,f:•X-'-rs ;e[ .rF;pv?s?r? inr,+AHR-i,r,rx
. ,r.. _ e .-s s,-st,-, sr., r�v,•rr.-rb. [i rl:, , ir. ,. .. .
r , wyr*
'" _ -'•l: c - _ .. 15°. `!' = f° r.r l+.t.. :°!irPrnr}ro
•:r. t r i 4t);'(r cr, .r-- _ Yc rrgtn-
.+..°- ,.z ,-. `i;:+..<. rav.-s.- ; f,.".,7, -�:2« � ,. P ++ ,,r:• '- < i r-h
.. �'-i + afS rt! nF S - t '•S(t`:?C{5 CP'.°e i�l`
-. .-. ,�•.t , r'n ,,n„k, .r,<-...f �r¢ s-•< r34 Ye Xr;, _ r>,. _ -`r.F
1
1411.11 '44110,
3. [4.12.6] Parking spaces for customers shall be clearly delineated on the ground, signed and maintained
for customers only. Distinguish between customer parking, employee parking and inventory parking on
the plan.
Final Plan:comment addressed.
4. [32.5.2(i)] Include state route number for Berkmar Drive (Rt 1403).
Final Plan: Comment addressed.
5. [32.5.2(i)] Include width of Berkmar Drive measured from centerline to property line.
Final Plan: Comment addressed.
6. [32.5.2(n)] Sheet 5 shows proposed grading within area labeled proposed undisturbed buffer. Please
amend "undisturbed buffer" limits to include only those areas to be protected and ensure undisturbed
buffer limits are consistent on all sheets.
Final Plan:Comment addressed.
7. [32.5.2(p)] Provide a landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9 and include the following:
a. For existing landscape features to be maintained:show the limits of clearing,the location and
type of protective fencing and show tree wells or walls where grade changes require it.There
appear to be several trees along the southern property line adjacent to the stormwater basin
that have grading below them.Are these trees to be preserved?Grading should not occur in
the drip lines of trees to be preserved.
Final Plan: For clarity,on the landscape plan sheet,show only the existing trees that are to be
preserved.Trees to be removed should not be shown on the landscape plan sheet.
Be sure that tree protective fencing is around dripline of all trees to be saved. It seems some
trees just inside and just outside of the east side of the front buffer could be saved by slightly
adjusting the location of tree protective fencing.
Rev 1:Comment not fully addressed. It is not clear what existing trees,if any,within 10'
landscaping buffer along the southern property line are being preserved.Sheet 2—existing
conditions/demolition plan shows two trees within the area of tree protective fencing being
preserved. However,these trees do match what is shown on the landscaping plan on sheet
9.There is also a note saying existing trees within this area are to be preserved but none are
shown. Please show and label which trees are to be preserved on both sheets and make sure
both sheets are consistent.
The first submittal had several trees within the southeastern corner of the site that were
being preserved.Are these no longer being preserved?
b. Include signed conservation checklist on the landscape plan
Final Plan:Comment addressed.
2
I L. of
Y
,.? � irmg a.Yy r°` #`eG into 3 'c?(1 i1'r--;z^nn..t o1 ' i
{• .r^ L. t,-.+v .s,;=?P'ir' .. n r,V,j?.?,�.`z:?pn grey. =Doty 19 or" shown ,'£";< SAt.°r F F rt-rtr2,-
"l^<r g 'tti p.y.: 6i.it t °;Fsnts!r C<4tYR` '7d� <'Yl cha $
$ - "r�:» r'r r•s^�r,e r.rc■ '."•inv :.xn ' ..i.s:nr.
d. A minimum tree canopy of 10% is required for this site. Provide calculations to show this
requirement is met.
Final Plan:The site area for this calculation should also include the area of TMP 45-94B that is
included in the parking area expansion. Existing trees to be preserved can also count towards
this canopy requirement.
Rev 1:Comment not addressed
e. Show what type of landcover will be used on screening berm.
Final Plan:Comment addressed
8. [SP201500005 condition#2]The boundaries of the area labeled as inventory parking are not clear.
Provide more specific labeling to distinguish inventory parking from customer/employee parking.
Final Plan:Comment addressed
9. [ZMA201400008 Proffer 1-e] Include the width of area labeled "Proposed Berkmar Drive Right of Way
Expansion." Include note to state that this area is reserved for future r/w dedication, pedestrian
improvements, and proposed street trees along Berkmar Drive.
Final Plan: Comment addressed
10. [ZMA201400008 Proffer 2] More evidence is needed to determine if parking area is adequately
screened from Berkmar Drive. Provide sections of proposed berm showing elevation relative to
parking area. Provide an inventory of existing trees to remain within undisturbed buffer area.
Final Plan: Comment addressed
.r, .,., . .. ur" : "''6 < t?vr,
�� � .. . .. � .
New comments:
13. [32.5.2(d)] On cover sheet note and sheet 2, amend labels of steep slopes.These slopes are called
"managed slopes" rather than "managed critical slopes". Critical slopes refer to slopes in rural areas
only.
Rev 1:Comment not addressed.
3
w
*ire Vaii,14. [Comment]This amendment cannot be approved until engineering,ARB,fire/rescue,ACSA, RWSA and
VDOT staff complete their review and grant their approval.Additional reviewer comments, if any,will
be forwarded upon receipt.
Rev 1:ARB,ACSA,RWSA,and VDOT approvals are still pending.
Please contact Rachel Falkenstein in the Planning Division by using rfalkenstein @albemarle.orq or 434-296-
5832 ext. 3272 for further information.
4