The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201400054 Correspondence 2014-07-23 • Now ' Christopher Perez From: Jeremy Lynn plynn @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:53 PM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Elaine Echols; Francis MacCall Subject: RE: Water Tank My notes indicated that we would need to have a public meeting prior to the Site Review Meeting. Then we would have a meeting with the Planning Commission and another with the BOS. Those are the only three I was aware of when we last met. Elaine, do you recall the purpose of the meeting? You mentioned it was in response to the backlash from the firing range project that is requiring additional meetings. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez @albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:47 PM To: Jeremy Lynn Cc: Elaine Echols; Francis MacCall Subject: RE: Water Tank Jeremy, I believe this entire proposal will have a couple of public meetings but which aspect of the proposal are you asking the question about? Christopher P. Perez;Senior Planner Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle.Virginia 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto:jlynn@ serviceauthority.orq] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 11:23 AM To: Christopher Perez Cc: Elaine Echols; Francis MacCall Subject: RE: Water Tank Chris, We submitted our Site Plan Application earlier this week. I recall in our meeting with Elaine that a public meeting was necessary for this project. When should that be scheduled and how should we go about getting that going? I believe you indicated that this should take place prior to the September Site Review Meeting. Please advise, thanks. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 1 %nro. wee From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez(a>albemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 4:33 PM To: Jeremy Lynn Cc: Elaine Echols; Francis MacCall Subject: RE: Water Tank Jeremy, Yes, the fees can all be paid in one check. See below for a list of what is needed for submittal. 1) For the site plan you will need to submit the completed application (obtain application at the link below), the application fee of$1500 shall be paid, and 16 copies of site plan shall be provided. http://www.albemarle.org/u_pload/images/forms center/departments/Community Development/ forms/applications/Site Plan_.. Amendment_Application.pdf 2) For the Special Exception it is a $425 fee and you need to submit the request for the special exception request of Section 4.10.3.1(b) and (c) please try and make the finding in item C (see below for the section of the ordinance in red) 3) For the public notification fees, these fee are not required for submittal of the site plan. The front desk won't take them with the application. Rather staff calculates these fees after the plan has been deemed complete and review can commence. The fee must be paid prior to Site Review Committee (SRC) meeting, staff will contact you once this fee has been calculated. The fee is calculated through the formula provided below in blue. 4) If you are also planning on submitting the 20' landscape easement that we previously discussed to be located on the adjoining neighbors property, then you will need to submit an easement plat for County review/ approval. To obtain application see link below. The review fee is $200. You'll also need to submit the plat and any deed work associated with it. http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms_center/departments/Community Development/ forms/applications/Easement_Plat &_Checklist.pdf 5) Comprehensive Plan Compliance Application http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms_center/departments/Community_Development/ forms/applications/Comprehensive Plan_Compliance_Application.pdf Notices required by Section 32.4.2.1 ( 1') 1're ar in.. and mailing or deliverin:_? up to fifty 50 notice; = S200.00 Preparimz and mailing or delivering, per notice more than lil. f 50? . $1 . 10 plus the actual cost of first class postage. 2 Name '4401 4.10.3.1 EXCEPTIONS--EXCLUDED FROM APPLICATION The structures identified below shall be subject to height limitations as follows: a. The height limitations of this chapter shall not apply to barns, silos, farm buildings, agricultural museums designed to appear as traditional farm buildings, residential chimneys, spires, flag poles, monuments, transmission towers and cables, smokestacks, water tanks, or radio or television antennas or towers. b. Any structure identified in subsection (a), other than one now or hereafter located on an existing public utility easement, shall not: (1) be located closer in distance to any lot line than the height of the structure; and (2) within a residential district, exceed one hundred (100) feet in height, except for telecommunications facilities owned or operated in whole or in part by the county, which shall not exceed one hundred fifteen (115) feet in height. c. The commission may modify or waive either requirement of subsection (b) in an individual case if it determines that the public health, safety or welfare would be equally or better served by the modification or waiver. In granting such modification or waiver, the commission may impose such conditions as it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare. d. The board of supervisors shall consider a modification or waiver of this subsection only as follows: 1. The denial of a modification or waiver, or the approval of a modification or waiver with conditions objectionable to the developer may be appealed to the board of supervisors as an appeal of a denial of the plat, as provided in section 14-226 of the Code, or the site plan, as provided in sections 32.4.2.7 or 32.4.3.9, to which the modification or waiver pertains. A modification or waiver considered by the commission in conjunction with an application for a special use permit shall be subject to review by the board of supervisors. 2. In considering a modification or waiver, the board may grant or deny the modification or waiver based upon the finding set forth in subsection (c), amend any condition imposed by the commission, and impose any conditions it deems necessary for the reasons set forth in subsection (c). Christopher P, Perez!Senior Planner Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle,Virginia 401 McIntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902 434.296.5832 ext.3443 From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto:jlynn @serviceauthority.org] Sent:Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:52 AM To: Christopher Perez Subject: FW: Water Tank Chris, Can you confirm the costs for our site plan submission? I need to request a check today. Can it all be on one check? yes 3 Nor • Major Site Plan Amendment-$1,500 Yes that is the correct fee. • Relief-$425 yes • Costs for Public Meeting Notice-??????? Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLSCaalbemarle.orq] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:32 PM To: 'Jeremy Lynn' Subject: RE: Water Tank Hi Jeremy, Not doing site plans in about 15 years, I'm a little rusty on this stuff so had to ask a bunch of questions of other staff. You check the 2 boxes on the site plan application: Major Amendment and Relief from conditions/modification or waiver of requirement on the application found here: http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/Community Development/forms/applications/Si to Plan - Amendment Application.pdf FEES El Major Amendment U Minor Amendment(alterations to parking.circulation,hi SI501) size.location).$500 16 folded copies of pion are required 8 folded copies of plan are required a Relief from conditions of approval;modification or waiver of requirements is S425 Notices required by Section 324..2.1 if) Preparing and mailing or delivering up to fifty(50) notices=$200.01) Preparing and mailing or delivering,per notice more than fifty(50)=$1.00 plus the actual cost of first class postage. The$1500 fee plus the$425 fee plus the public notice costs apply. I'll need to ask you to coordinate on fees with Francis or Christopher when you get back. I'm just way out of my element there! Have a great vacation. Elaine From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto:jlynn@ serviceauthority.orq] Sent: Friday,June 27, 2014 2:28 PM To: Elaine Echols Subject: RE: Water Tank Elaine, Thanks for meeting with me this afternoon. What is the name of the Exception form that I need? I wanted to download a copy and send to Chip. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 4 • 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 ,4110, (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLSOalbemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:53 PM To: 'Jeremy Lynn' Subject: RE: Water Tank See you then. Elaine From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto lynn(aserviceauthoritv.orq] Sent: Thursday,June 26, 2014 2:51 PM To: Elaine Echols Subject: RE: Water Tank I'll try to come between 1:15 and 1:30. See you tomorrow. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS(aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:47 PM To: 'Jeremy Lynn' Subject: RE: Water Tank 1:30 will work. If you wanted to come at 1:15,we might have a little more time, if we need it, since I have a meeting at 2 p.m. From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto:jlynnOserviceauthority.orq] Sent: Thursday,June 26, 2014 2:45 PM To: Elaine Echols Subject: RE: Water Tank Elaine, If 1:30 pm will work for you, let me know and I will come over to the COB. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLSOalbemarle.orq] Sent:Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:44 PM To: 'Jeremy Lynn' Subject: RE: Water Tank Are you available some time between 11 a.m.and 2 p.m.tomorrow? If so, could you pick a time to meet and I can give you answers to your questions and talk about any outstanding concerns. Thanks. 5 • Now Elaine From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto:jlynn@ serviceauthority.orq] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:19 PM To: Elaine Echols Cc: Chip Votava Subject: RE: Water Tank Elaine, There would be significant challenges in moving the tank. It would have an impact on our grading plan and significantly impact the fire departments parking lot. This would also likely require retaining walls. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS@albemarle.orq] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:09 AM To: 'Jeremy Lynn' Subject: RE: Water Tank Yes,we should have some answers by Friday and can meet. Out of curiosity, is there any ability for the tank to be pushed back a little more from the south property line? Would there be major problems moving it back? From: Jeremy Lynn [mailto:jlynn@serviceauthority.orq] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:38 AM To: Elaine Echols Cc: cvotava@ mbakercorp.com; Christopher Perez Subject: RE: Water Tank Elaine, I will be out of the office until at least Wednesday, July 9th and may not actually return until Monday, July 14th. Can you meet this week or does that not provide you with enough time to discuss the items internally? 1. The 32.5 feet includes the room to the right-of-way. Specifically, here is the breakdown: • 19.5 feet from the tank to the screening plant • 5 feet from the screening plant to the sidewalk • 5 feet of sidewalk • 3 feet from the sidewalk to the property line (the tree was moved to the property line, which is also the ROW) • In addition, please note 3 feet from property line to the face of curb. 2. There is an email history regarding the 20' from the south property line with the County (see attached). Andrew Boninti and Alan Franklin are aware of the setback issue. Andrew signed off on waiving the buffer requirement as part of our contract with the County and their rezoning shows the location of the tank being close to that property line. Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road, Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 977-4511 ext. 114 6 . • From: Elaine Echols [mailto:EECHOLS(aalbemarle.orq] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 5:06 PM To: 'jlynn @serviceauthority.org' Cc: 'cvotava @mbakercorp.com'; Christopher Perez Subject: Water Tank Hi Jeremy, You, Chris,and I probably need to talk again, but, I don't think it is necessary for Chip to come from VA Beach to talk with us. A few things have come up since Chris and I began discussing the answers we need to provide you. First, I realize that I need to be clear on what is being proposed along the street frontage as well as between the tank and the adjoining residential lots to the south. I don't know what was finally decided on or what you are proposing. Does the 30'from the property line include room for additional street r.o.w that includes street trees and a sidewalk, in addition to buffering vegetation? This is what I thought had been worked out, but, I really don't know. In addition, I don't know that you and I have ever really talked about the setback to the lots to the south. One of the early drawings showed about 32' between the tank and the southern lot line, but,with only 20', I worry that the future residents may feel like the tank is right in their back yard. Has this situation been discussed with Andrew Boninti? I also just found out when telling David Benish about this project,that on July 2 the Board will be reviewing a new development review schedule for public projects for compliance with the comprehensive plan. The review period is much longer than what I provided to you today. I need to talk to David and Wayne about how this might affect your review schedule. Chris and I will be back with you later this week with answers about schedules and whether this will qualify as a major or minor amendment. Please let me know what you can about the expected street frontage components and anything more you can share about the setback to the residential units. Thanks. Elaine Elaine K. Echols, FAICP Principal Planner—Albemarle County Community Development 401 Mclntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5823 x 3252 7 Michael Baker Innovation Done Right...We hake a Difference INTERNATIONAL September 12,2014 Mr.Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 RE: SDP-201400054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank,Pump Station,and Water Main Project At East Rivanna Fire Station--Major Site Plan Amendment ACSA Project 2013-04 Dear Mr.Perez: The following responses to County comments,dated September 3,2014,are provided. Comments by Christopher P.Perez, Senior Planner,Dept. of Community Development In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required: 1. [Comment] The project requires a Comprehensive Plan Compliance review(CCP)by the Planning Commission prior to final site plan approval.The revised Site Plan is anticipated to be used for this review and taken to the Planning Commission as an exhibit. Prior to scheduling the CCP please revise the plan to meet the following comments. Response: Acknowledged 2. [32.5.2(a)]Setbacks. On the cover sheet of the plan assure that the setbacks for the water tank are listed as 1 to 1 based on the height of the tower.As proposed the site requires two special exceptions both to reduce the required setbacks to property lines(rear and side). A request has been submitted and is being processed. Prior to final site plan approval the special exceptions should be listed on the cover sheet of the site plan to date. iuciuuc i icu'&j:i17IGvhi uaw. Response: The following notes have been added to Sheet 1: Setbacks: 1 to 1 based on water tank structure height. Special Exception approved on 3. [Comment]It does not appear that any of the previously approved items on the Fire Station Site Plan (SDP92-4 and LOR#1 and LOR#2)are being modified with this plan.Thus for all items previously approved on the Fire Station Site Plan which are not needed for access to the proposed storage tank facility, please gray them out and subdue them,assure they are still legible. Also assure a note is provided on the previously approved items which states: "Existing items previously approved on SDP1992-4 and LOR#1 dated July 20, 2000 and LOR#2 dated February 20, 2004". Also,please assure the improvement from LOR#2,a 14'x16'wooden deck at the edge of the travelway behind the building,is depicted,labeled and subdued. The improvements which were subject of LOR #1 are already depicted on the plan (lighting). Response: As requested features and labels are shown on Sheets 3 and 5.A note has been added to Sheet 3 stating "Existing items previously approved on SDP1992-4, LOR#1 dated July 20, 2000, and LOR#2 dated February 20, 2004 are shown". RBF 272 Bendix Road,Suite 4001 Virginia Beach,VA 23452 KASEMAN ESALLVPORT MBAKERINTL.COM Office:757.463.8770I Fax:757.463.0503 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 2 4. [32.5.2(a);32.5.2(e)]General information. Provide a separate sheet which depicts the existing conditions of the site.Specifically with regard to the existing trees onsite. Response: Existing conditions of the site provided as Sheets 3 and 4,including existing trees to be utilized for screening. 5. [Comment] On sheet 1, under the title of the site plan is what appears to be an ACSA project number:'project number 2013-04";however, Community Development (CD) also utilizes project numbers, to avoid confusion, either omit the number entirely or specify that it's an ACSA project number and also provide the CD project number: "SDP2014-54 Major Site Plan Amendment to SDP1992-4". Response: Sheet 1 has been revised to include ACSA Project Number 2013-04 and the CD project number SDP2014-54, Major Site Plan Amendment to SDP1992-4. 6. [Comment] Also,currently the title of the site plan is"Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station and Water Main Project"; however, the title should also reference the existing "East Rivanna Fire Station". Revise. Response: Title modified to Glenmore Ground Storage Tank,Pump Station and Water Main Project at East Rivanna Fire Station on sheet 1.Additionally,all sheets have been revised to include the CD project number. 7. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet 1,under Albemarle County Service Authority is "Charlottevsille, VA" assure this item is replaced with "Albemarle County." As the site plan is taking place in Albemarle County. Response: Modified as requested. 8. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet 1,under Existing Use, Water Storage Tank and Pump Station is listed;however the Fire Station is also on the property. Add 'Fire Station' use to existing uses. Response:Modified as requested. 9. [32.5.2(01 General Information. On the plan provide the zoning districts and the uses of abutting properties. Response: As requested the zoning districts and uses of properties abutting the site are listed on sheets 3 and 4 as well as on sheet 5. 10. [32.5.2(a)] On the plan provide the parcel size(acreage). Response: Parcel size for the existing property is 6.0 acres and has been shown on sheets 3 and 5. 11. [32.5.2(a)] Zoning.This property is zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD). Also, the property is subject to proffers associate with ZMA2001-8 Rivanna Village at Glenmore and a Code of Development.Assure this information is noted on the plan's cover sheet. Response: As requested,a note stating the zoning is Zoning of Neighborhood Model District(NMD) and a note stating the property is subject to proffers associate with ZMA2001-8 Rivanna Village at Glenmore and a Code of Development have been added to the Plan's cover sheet(sheet 1). 12. [32.5.2(i)]Provide the pavement width for both entrances to the site and their associated accessways/travelways. Response: As requested,the existing pavement widths for the entrances to the site and associated accessways/travelways to the site(24' wide)have been shown on Sheet 5. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 3 13. [32.5.2(i)] Dimension all travelways being used by the proposed use and provide directional arrows to signify traffic flow throughout the site.Also, on page 8 the proposed 20' ingress and egress easement is in an area where the approved travelway was 24' wide. Is the travelway still 24' wide? Response: The travelway widths and traffic flow arrows have been shown on sheet 5. ACSA's standard ingress/egress easement requirement is a width of 20'. A travelway of 24' is available; however,the ingress/egress casement has remained at 20'. 14. [32,5.2(b)]Provide the maximum amount of impervious cover proposed on the site. Response: The existing impervious area is 88,701 SF.The proposed impervious will be an additional 4,201 SF for a total impervious area of 92,902 SF. The following information has been included on sheet 5: Existing Impervious Area: 88,701 SF Proposed Total Impervious Area: 92,902 SF. 15. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum acreage occupied by each use. Response: The existing and proposed acreage of the site occupied by each use has been provided on sheet 5. 16. [32.5.2(b)] Clearly list the proposed structures' square footage as well as the overall square footage for the site. Response: As requested,the square footage for existing fire department building and the proposed pump station,water tank and generator slab have been shown on sheet 5. 17. [32.6.2(h)] Signature panel. Provide a signature panel for all SRC reviewers to sign the site plan. Response:A signature panel has been provided for all SRC reviewers as requested on Sheet 1. 18. [Comment] On the site plan provide the information as to whether the site is served by public water and sewer. Response: As requested. a note has been added to the site plan(sheet 5)that the site is not served by public water or sewer. 19. [32.5.2(b)] Information regarding proposed use. Provide the maximum height of all proposed structures. Response: The maximum heights of the proposed water tank and pump station have been provided on sheet 5 as requested. 20. [32.5.2(a)] On sheet 1 under tax map parcel information assure all parcels involved in the proposal are listed. Response: Tax map parcel information for all parcels involved with the proposed project has been listed on sheet 1. 21. [32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(d)] Provide the source of topography. Response: As provided by note 1 on Sheet 2,topography was provided by Rinker Design Associates, P.C.using conventional survey methods. 22. [32.5.2(b), 4.12.7]Parking. Provide information regarding parking for the proposed use, including how much is required for the proposed use.If shared parking is to be utilized, a shared parking agreement shall be furnished and an explanation as to how the two uses would overlap to accommodate the parking agreement. See 4.12.7 of the Albemarle County Code for explanation of parking for unscheduled uses. Response: There are no delineated(painted)parking spaces in front of the proposed pump station(to err Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 4 prevent public use of the parking area).Typically,short duration unscheduled maintenance visits by a single ACSA vehicle will occur daily.There is space provided for two vehicles. A sign will be placed in front of the parking area stating"Authorized Vehicles Only".This signage requirement has been included as a note on sheet 5. 23. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum amount of impervious cover on the site. Response: See response to number 14 above. 24. [32 5.2(d)] Show/label areas of the site with managed and/or preserved steep slopes. Response: As requested,Areas of managed and/or steep slopes have been shown on sheets 5,7,8,9, and 10. Refer to the legend on Sheet 2 to identify the symbology. 25. [32.5.2(n)] Label blank areas around the water tank with the intended ground cover/surface treatment. Response: Ground areas around the proposed water tank and pump station will have a grass cover. Sheets 5 and 6 have been revised to clarify this requirement. 26. [32.5.2(j,k,l)] Verify that the location(s) of all existing or proposed utilities and utility easements including water, sewer, drainage, telephone, cable, electric and gas are shown on the plan. Label any existing easements with the Deed Book and Page Number. Response: Information available for existing utilities and easements are depicted on Sheets 3 and 4, as well as on the respective sheets for proposed work.Proposed easements are shown on sheets 5,6, 7,8,9, 10, 11 with"DB ,PG. " until recordation is complete. 27. [32.6.2(j) & Comment] Please show utilities and associated easements on the landscape plan to verify that no conflicts exist with planting locations. Response: Utilities and associated easements have been shown on the Landscape Plan (sheet 6)to show no conflicts exist with the planting locations. LM. [32.5.2(n)j Label and provide the dimensions or all proposed improvements. Response: The dimensions of proposed improvements have been shown on sheet 5. 29. [Comment] As proposed off-site easements are required, easement plats must be submitted,reviewed, approved and recorded prior to Site Plan approval. Deed Book and Page reference information of each recorded easement shall be listed on the site plan. Specifically for: "Proposed 20'Permanent Easement", "Proposed Variable Width Permanent Easement", "Proposed 10' Tempora:y Easement", and "Proposed 20'Landscaping Easement"on TMP 093A1-00-00-00400. Please submit easement plat(s) to the County to facilitate these items. Also, for the landscape easement provide a maintenance agreement which shall be reviewed/approved by the.County Attorney and will be set to record with the plat. Response: As discussed with Mr.Perez,easements plats will be provided to Albemarle County when acquired.The plans have been revised to show a DB,PG reference that can be updated when recordation process is complete. Also,if any work or easements are taking place on TMP 07900-00-00-025B0,which is owned by Robert and Carolyn Livengood, such easements shall be recorded as well. Response: There is no proposed work or proposed easement on TMP 07900-00-00-025B0. 30. [32.5.2 (lb)]Scale. Pages 6, 7, 8,9,and 10 all utilize a scale of 1" =25'; however, this is not an acceptable scale.Please revise to provide an appropriate scale of either 1" =20' or 1" =40'. Revise. Michael Baker Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 5 Response: As requested,scales have been changed to 1"=20' for sheets 7,8,9, 10 and 11 (previously sheets 6-10). 31. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. Throughout the plan there are notes which reference various sheets for details to tank,pump, and altitude and pressure sustaining valve vault assembly (see sheet 8);however, none of these sheets or details are provided in the site plan. Either provide the sheets or omit the notes on sheet 8. Also, in total the cover sheet lists 32 pages; however, only 15 pages are provided in the site plan set. Please explain why these pages are omitted from the plan.If the pages are to be provided,please add them to the set.If they are not to be provided, omit them from the sheet 1 index of drawings and re-number pages appropriately. Response: As requested,only sheets for the Site Plan are included.A total of 15 sheets comprise the submittal. 32. [32.6.2(g)] All water facilities to be dedicated to public use and the easements for those facilities shall be identified by a statement that the facilities are to be dedicated to the Albemarle County Service Authority. Response: Acknowledged.A note has been added to sheet 2(#22)stating that"All water facilities and water line easements are to be dedicated to the Albemarle County Service Authority".The utilities and easements are shown on Sheets 5-11. 33. [32.5.2e,32.5.2p,32.6.2(j)], 32.7.9.4] Landscape plan. A landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9 is required prior to the Major Site Plan Amendment approval. The landscape plan shall verify that the site satisfies the minimum landscaping and screening requirements of Section 32. See comments below. Response: The Landscape Plan has been revised based upon discussion with the Albemarle County. 34. [32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7] Screening. Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting new plant materials in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section 32.7.9 subject to the agent's approval. Specifically some of the existing trees within the proposed 20' landscaping easement are between 20' -6U' tall and nave a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees present. Please verify die above on the site plan on the existing conditions page and landscape plan. Upon verification, it may be appropriate for the existing trees to be preserved as undisturbed buffer area, as mature trees will provide superior screening of the tower from day one. If the existing mature trees within the 20' landscape easement are determined by the Agent to be adequate to screen the facility the following shall be followed: Response: Existing tree information is provided for the 20' landscaping easement on the existing conditions sheet and the landscaping plan Sheets 3 and 6. The landscape plan should show the trees to be preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling proposed beyond the limits of clearing.In addition, the applicant shall sign a conservation checklist approved by the agent to insure that the specified trees will be protected during construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, such checklist shall conform to specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, pp ill-284 through ill-297, and as hereafter amended. This checklist must be signed,dated and included on the plans. Response: The checklist has been signed and included on sheet 6. 35. [32.6.2(j) &32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Minimum depth and spacing requirements for a planting strip or existing vegetation. Ifonly a planting strip or existing vegetation is provided as screening, the planting strip or the existing vegetation shall not be less than twenty (20)feet in depth. Ifa planting strip is Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 6 provided, the plant materials shall consist of a double staggered row of evergreen trees planted fifteen (15)feet on center, or a double staggered row of evergreen shrubs planted ten (10)feet on center, or an alternative vegetative screening approved by the agent. To meet the above requirement the landscape plan shall be revised as follows: e Within the side yard,replace all the 'Nellie Stevens Holly' with evergreen trees, it may be appropriate to continue utilizing 'Leyland cypress' in place of the 'Nellie Stevens Holly' or the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved evergreen tree. Revise to assure double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on center. Also, assure that this planting strip is a minimum of 20'deep, currently its only 14' deep. Also continue the planting strip another 25 feet to the other side of the 'Altitude and Pressure Sustaining Valve Vault Assembly' to completely screen the tower from the road. Revise. Response: The plan has a 20-foot wide planting strip along the property line. The landscaping has been revised to provide two rows of Leyland Cypress at 15' on center. The rows of tress have been extended as requested to provide further screening of the tank. No trees are planted over the water main. • Within the proposed 20' landscape easement, if the existing trees are determined not to be adequate or the applicant is unable to preserve them and instead goes with new plantings assure the following is met. Provide another row of evergreen tree in addition to the row depicted to meet the minimum screening, it may be appropriate to continue utilizing 'Leyland cypress' in the second row or the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved evergreen tree. Revise to assure double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on center. Response: The landscape plan(sheet 6) has been revised describe the existing trees and provide a tree save area to provide a natural buffer. 36. [32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Screening. The proposal includes a detention pond towards the southernmost boundary of the property. This feature is required to be screened from residentially zoned parcels per 32.7.9(a)3. Also, with the proposal, clearing is taking place to the property line adjaeent LO residentially zoned land, this clearing causes the parking lot to be visible from the residentially zoned land. For both of these items provide screening which meets the requirements of32.7.9.7. Response: As discussed with Mr.Perez,the alignment of the water main on sheet 10 has been revised to provide a natural wooded buffer to screen the biodetention facility. 37. [32.5.2(n),32.6.2(k)& 4.17] Lighting. Is any outdoor lighting proposed with the site plan?If so, all lighting (including building mounted fixtures)must be shown on a lighting plan that includes a photometric plan, luminaire schedule and cut sheets for each proposed fixture. Response: A lighting plan has been provided on sheet 15 of the Site Plan submittal. 38. [32.5.6(a)] When revisions are submitted,provide a date and description of revision specific to submittal to the County. Response: A revision block has been added to all sheets that were revised from the previous submittal and detailed descriptions of comment responses are included in this letter. 39. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. Response: Acknowledged Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 7 Comments from John Anderson,Albemarle County Engineering (A site plan is a record of zoning compliance on the property. It should not include VSMP plans.) Response: Per discussion with Mr.Anderson on September 9,2014,all erosion and sediment control and stormwater management information and related sheets have been removed from the Site Plan submittal. Code Chapter 18 section 32,part of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. Title pg.-Label major roads on Location Map to help orient project. Response: Major roads have been identified on sheet 1 in the Location Map. 2. Label existing parking,East Rivanna VFD,sheet 4 and across site plan sheets. Response: Existing parking lot has been labeled on sheets 3 and 5. 3. Revise Legend,sheet 2,to include SAF,TS,MU, and TP(VESCH symbols). Response: VESCH symbols have been removed from the Site Plan submittal. 4. Show Managed Steep Slopes on TMP 79-25A on sheets 4,9. Ref.County GIS,Overlay District, and §8- 30.7.5.d.-Re-establish existing grade;do not construct fill or cut slopes on Managed Steep Slopes(none are proposed). Response: As requested,Areas of managed and/or steep slopes have been shown on sheets 3,4, 5,7, 8,9,and 10. Refer to the legend on Sheet 2 to identify the symbology. 5. Provide pipe end wall and revised surface contours for proposed 42' L pipe,sheets 5/22, #19, below, Covering exposed pipe(with riprap)is an unorthodox approach. Propose final contours that accommodate pipe with end wall design. Eliminate need to partially embed,leaving exposed,28 LF± of 18" DIA concrete pipe. Response: The 18"storm drainage outfall on sheet 5 has been revised to include an end wall. Additionally,the alignment has been changed to allow the outfall to be directed to the existing site drainage swale. Sheet 13 provides a profile of the storm pipe and associated structures. 6. Sheet 5:It appears that Ex.pavement(VFD) will be cut to install two 18"DIA storm pipes (124', 42'). Furnish pavement cut,repair,depth details. Provide accompanying pavement notes. Response: As requested,a pavement repair details have been included for repairs to Steamer Drive and Glenmore Way.A pavement repair has also been included for the parking lot on the site that will be affected by the installation of the 18"diameter storm pipes. These details are shown on sheet 14. 7. If new easement is required between Glenmore Way(inbound/outbound)in the area north of Steamer Drive (sheet 6), show proposed new temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements. Response: No easements are required between Glenmore Way(inbound/outbound)in the area north of Steamer Drive as this area is right-of-way(ROW).The ROW in this area is now clearly noted. New temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements are shown on sheets 5-11. 8. Sheet 7:Locate drain field on TMP 093A1-00-00-00400 if drain field boundaries known. Response: The approximate location of the drainfields for TMP 093A1-00-00-00400 has been shown on sheets 3 and 7 as requested. 9. Sheet 9/10:Confirm variable width permanent easement is proposed between bracketing,20' wide proposed permanent easements. Response: The depiction of easements has been modified with ACSA's concurrence. Permanent water line easements are now 20'wide. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 8 10. Edit notes,sheet 18,to remove reference to"Station X+XX,""Sheet XX," and"XX-inch culvert." Response: Sheet 18 has been removed from the Site Plan submittal.The sheet will be provided with the VSMP and the references will be corrected. 11. Sheet 18:Revise note to meet VAR10 inspection frequency requirements(VAR10,Part II,F.). Link: iittn: '1i\lli.dccl 4ituilita girl DItI<_!rain, \iafLift ',torlil\tafeiiilalia.letnenu l,,rilDnerlllikc c,n,tructineetietai perm it.aspx Response: Sheet 18 has been removed from the Site Plan submittal.The sheet will be provided with the VSMP and the note will be corrected. 12. Sheet 19:Label Glenmore Way(cul-de-sac). Response: Sheet 19 has been removed from the Site Plan submittal.Glenmore Way(cul-de-sac)is labeled and shown on sheet 11 of the Site Plan submittal. Comments below pertain to required VSMP application: Response: Comments 13-32 will be addressed in VSMP Submittal. 13. Submit VSMP Application,ref.§17-401, 17-402. 14. Label feature that appears to be a stone entrance,sheet 5. Feature does not appear to be a CE or generator pad(S end of Ex.parking lot). 15. Sheet 7:provide CIP at Ex. 18"RCP storm drain,Inv.388.80,sta.+48,after 12"water line installation is complete. 16. Confirm that project limits of disturbance=1.497 Ac(total Area of Disturbance across all plan sheets. Ref. sheet 18,Existing Site Conditions). 17. Provide orange safety fence(SAF)between project limits and areas accessible to the public:Fire Station, Glenmore Way(including cul-de-sac),and Steamer Drive,per detail,sheet 20. 18. Provide L x W for riprap outfall protection at 62'D1A, 35'Hwatertank,across plan sheets. 19. Provide L x W for revised riprap outfall protection at proposed 42'L @ 2.2%slope 18"DIA concrete storm pipe (sheet 5,22).-see #5,above 20. Show on-site stockpiles,if any. 21. Identify off-site stockpile,waste,or borrow areas. 22. Revise Management Strategy,Note 6,sheet 18,to reference plan authority authorization and approval needed to remove ESC measures. See Sequence of Construction Note 10,sheet 23,as template. 23. Sheet 18:ACDSM General Construction Notes for ESC plans now number 1-20;please replace 1-22. Link: http://www.albemarle.org/departrnent.asp?departrnent=cdd&relpage=4447 24. ESC:Revise CE labels across plan sheets consistent with Project Narrative,Structural Practices Narrative. Revise CE label to:temporary paved wash rack(PCB). -see sheet 18. 25. Replace or supplement CE detail,sheet 20,with paved wash rack detail,per ACDSM,below. -see #24 26. Sheet 22 appears to provide sufficient information to evaluate SWM plans against Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Redevelopment Worksheet,but reserve comment on SWM plan not yet submitted. 27. Sheet 22:Show bioretention bed W x L dimensions in plan view: 13' x 26'. 28. Sheet 22:Provide 1.1 CFS 100-yr storm event calculation/s. 29. Sheet 22:Specify frequency for 0.5' depth of water above the bioretention area. 30. Sheet 22:Provide sizing calculations or design summary for grass swales leading to bioretention bed. 31. Submit SWPPP for project,ref. §17-405. LOD,item#16, VPDES Registration statement should match LOD shown on plans. 32. SWM and ESC plans may not include site plan. Remove site plan sheets from SWM/ESC plans. A site plan(Amendment)cannot be approved as part of SWM/ESC Plans. lirmr *me Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez September 12, 2014 Page 9 Comments from Troy Austin,P.E.,VDOT Land Use Engineer—Culpeper District 1. Details for appurtenances that will be located within dedicated right-of-way need to be included on the site plan. More specifically,the details forPRV vault and the air release assembly need to be shown on the site plan. Response:As requested,details for the PRV vault and air release assembly have been included on sheets 12 and 14,respectively. 2. The preference is that the wet-tap to the existing 16"DIP waterline in the cul-de-sac of Glenmore Way be made in the shoulder rather than under the asphalt of the cul-de-sac. Response: Performing the wet-tap connection outside of the pavement limits was examined during design.However,there are existing water service connections that required the wet-tap to be performed in the pavement.The approximate locations of existing water service connection have been shown on sheet 11 for clarity. During construction,ACSA will oversee the work and evaluate if actual field conditions allow the wet tap to be moved to the shoulder. 3. A Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office for all construction activity occurring within dedicated right-of-way. This permit should be obtained prior to commencement of construction activity. Response: Acknowledged Building Inspections-Jay Schlothauer 1) No comments or conditions. Response: Acknowledged Fire and Rescue-Robbie Gilmer 1) No comments or conditions. Response: Acknowledged E911-Andrew Slack 1) Approved Response: Acknowledged ACSA No comments provided as they are the applicant. Response: Acknowledged Thank you for assistance in this project.If you have any questions or require additional information,please do hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, MICHAEL BAKER JR. INC. f Chip Votava,P.E. Project Manager CFV/rfg innovation Done F1Glii...VVc Make o Difference INTERNATIONAL November 5,2014 Mr. Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 P1 SDP-201400054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station,and Water Mai-I Pre . :r fit. ?a- Rivanna F ire Station- Major Site Plan :Amendment ACS.A Project 2013-04 Dear Mr. Perez: re Following responses to County comments,dated September 30 and October 3, 2014,are provid '. All former ,mmcnts and responses are included in our response letter. New comments are italicized and ies;:)nres.:re p,-,-, ided in hold text. Comments by Christopher P.Perez, Senior Planner,Dept. of Community Development In order for the amended site plan to be approved the following revisions are required: I. [Comment] The project requires a Comprehensive Plan Compliance review(CCP)by the Planning Commission prior to final site plan approval.The revised Site Plan is anticipated to be used for this review and taken to the Planning Conunission as an exhibit. Prior to scheduling the CCP please revise the plan to meet the following comments. Response: Acknowledged Rev 1 Comment still valid. Claudette 6:int is the Planner working this item through the Planning Commission. If you have questions about u'l:f.n this is ti go to the PC please contact '.er i't '34.290.:i8J. I>113'50„r Response: Acknowledged 2. 132.5.2(a)]Setbacks. On the cover sheet of the plan assure that the setbacks for the water tank are listed as I to l based on the height of the tower.As proposed the site requires two special exceptions both to reduce the required setbacks to property lines(rear and side). A request has been submitted and is being processed Prior to final site plan approval the special exceptions should be listed on the cover sheet of the site plan to include their approval date. Response: The following notes have been added to Sheet 1: Setbacks: 1 to 1 based on water tank structure height. Special Exception _approved on Rev I. Comment partially addressed with the note on sheet 1, once the special exceptions are approved, the plan shall be revised to assure the BOS approval date of the special exceptions are provided on the plan, also provide the approved setbacks on the plan and any conditions associated with it. Staff plans to take the special exceptions to the BOS at their December meeting due to the.CCP's schedule. Response: Acknowledged 3. [Comment]It does not appear that any of the previously approved items on the Fire Station Site Plan (SDP92-4 and LOR#1 and LOR#2)are being modified with this plan.Thus for all items previously 272 Bendix Road,Suite 400 I Virginia Beach,VA 23452 jma �!?4. Y,ASMUN /ysAuYPORT MBAKERINTL.COM Office:757.463.8770 I Fax:757.463.0503 *.11111V VW, ii a�, INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 2 of 11 approved on the Fire Station Site Plan which are not needed for access to the proposed storage tank facility, please gray them out and subdue them,assure they are still legible.Also assure a note is provided on the previously approved items which states: "Existing items previously approved on SDP1992-4 and LOR#1 dated July 20, 2000 and LOR#2 dated February 20, 2004". Also,please assure the improvement from LOR#2,a 14'x16'wooden deck at the edge of the travelway behind the building,is depicted, labeled and subdued. The improvements which were subject of LOR #1 are already depicted on the plan (lighting). Response: As requested features and labels are shown on Sheets 3 and 5.A note has been added to Sheet 3 stating "Existing items previously approved on SDP1992-4, LOR#1 dated July 20, 2000, and LOR#2 dated February 20, 2004 are shown". 4. [32.5.2(a); 32.5.2(e)]General information. Provide a separate sheet which depicts the existing conditions of the site.Specifically with regard to the existing trees onsite. Response:Existing conditions of the site provided as Sheets 3 and 4, including existing trees to be utilized for screening. 5. [Comment] On sheet 1, under the title of the site plan is what appears to be an ACSA project number: "r"n, !.,ct nwn wer_"70 _2_0..4", h_owever, D—evelopment (CD) also utilizes project n mher s.to avoid confusion, either omit the number entirely or specify that it's an ACSA project number and also provide the CD project number: "SDP2014-54 Major Site Plan Amendment to SDP1992-4". Response: Sheet 1 has been revised to include ACSA Project Number 2013-04 and the CD project number SDP2014-54, Major Site Plan Amendment to SDP1992-4, 6. [Comment] Also,currently the title of the site plan is"Glenmore Ground Storage Tank, Pump Station and Water Main Project"; however, the title should also reference the existing "East Rivanna Fire Station''. Revise Response: Title modified to Glenmore Giound Storage Tank,Pump Station and Water Main Prject at East Rivanna Fire Station on sheet 1. Additionally,all sheets have been revised to include the CD project number. 7. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet 1,under Albemarle County Service Authority is "Charlottevsille, VA" assure this item is replaced with "Albemarle County." As the site plan is taking place in Albemarle County. Response: Modified as requested. 8. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On sheet 1, under Existing Use, Water Storage Tank and Pump Station is listed;however the Fire Station is also on the property. Add 'Fire Station' use to existing uses. Response: Modified as requested. 9. [32.5.2(a)] General Information. On the plan provide the zoning districts and the uses of abutting properties. Response: As requested the zoning districts and uses of properties abutting the site are listed on sheets 3 and 4 as well as on sheet 5. 10. [32.5.2(a)] On the plan provide the parcel size(acreage). Response: Parcel size for the existing property is 6.0 acres and has been shown on sheets 3 and 5. 11. [32.5.2(a)] Zoning.This property is zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD). Also, the property is subject to proffers associate with ZMA2001-8 Rivanna Village at Glenmore and a Code of wove ael er, INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 3 of 11 Development.Assure this information is noted on the plan's cover sheet. Response: As requested,a note stating the zoning is Zoning of Neighborhood Model District(NMD)and a note stating the property is subject to proffers associate with ZMA2001-8 Rivanna Village at Glenmore and a Code of Development have been added to the Plan's cover sheet(sheet 1). 12. [32.5.2(i)]Provide the pavement width for both entrances to the site and their associated ac ce ssways/travelways. Response: As requested,the existing pavement widths for the entrances to the site and associated accessways/travelways to the site(24' wide)have been shown on Sheet 5. 13. [32.5.2(i)] Dimension all travelways being used by the proposed use and provide directional arrows to signify traffic flow throughout the site. Also, on page 8 the proposed 20' ingress and egress easement is in an area where the approved travelway was 24' wide. Is the travelway still 24' wide? Response: The travelway widths and traffic flow arrows have been shown on sheet 5. ACSA's standard ingress/egress easement requirement is a width of 20'. A travelway of 24' is available;however,the ingress/egress easement has remained at 20'. 14. [32.5.2(b)]Provide the maximum amount of impervious cover proposed on the site. Response: The existing impervious area is 88,701 SF. The proposed impervious will be an additional 4.201 SF for a total impervious area of 92,902 SF, The following information has been included on sheet 5: Existing Impervious Area: 88,701 SF Proposed Total Impervious Area: 92,902 SF. 15. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum acreage occupied by each use. Response: The existing and proposed acreage of the site occupied by each use has been provided on sheet 5. 16. [32.5.2(b)] Clearly list the proposed structures' square footage as well as the rnµara oot overall sq _g_ overall f tacrP for the site, Response: As requested,the square footage for existing tire department building and the proposed pump station,water tank and generator slab have been shown on sheet 5. 17. [32.6.2(h)] Signature panel. Provide a signature panel for all SRC reviewers to sign the site plan. Response: A signature panel has been provided for all SRC reviewers as requested on Sheet 1. 18. [Comment] On the site plan provide the information as to whether the site is served by public water and sewer. Response: As requested,a note has been added to the site plan(sheet 5)that the site is not served by public water or sewer. 19. [32.5.2(b)] Information regarding proposed use. Provide the maximum height of all proposed structures. Response: The maximum heights of the proposed water tank and pump station have been provided on sheet 5 as requested. 20. [32.5.2(a)] On sheet 1 under tax map parcel information assure all parcels involved in the proposal are listed. Response: Tax map parcel information for all parcels involved with the proposed project has been listed on sheet 1. NIINW` Noel >tchael -aker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 4 of 11 21. [32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(d)] Provide the source of topography. Response: As provided by note 1 on Sheet 2,topography was provided by Rinker Design Associates,P,C. using conventional survey methods. 22. [32.5.2(b), 4.12.7]Parking. Provide information regarding parking for the proposed use, including how much is required for the proposed use.If shared parking is to be utilized, a shared parking agreement shall be furnished and an explanation as to how the two uses would overlap to accommodate the parking agreement. See 4.12. 7 of the Albemarle County Code for explanation of parking for unscheduled uses. Response:There are no delineated(painted)parking spaces in front of the proposed pump station(to prevent public use of the parking area).Typically,short duration unscheduled maintenance visits by a single ACSA vehicle will occur daily. There is space provided for two vehicles. A sign will be placed in front of the parking area stating"Authorized Vehicles Only". This signage requirement has been included as a note on sheet 5, 23. [32.5.2(b)] Provide the maximum amount of impervious cover on the site. Response: See response to number 14 above. 24. [32 5.2(d)] Show/label areas of the site with managed and/or preserved steep slopes. Response: As requested Areas of managed and/or steep slopes have been shown on sheets 5. 7. 8. 9. and 10. Refer to the legend on Sheet 2 to identify the symbology. Rev I. Comment partially addressed. On sheet 2 the legends lists "managed and,/or preserved steep slopes";however, there are no preserved slopes onsite. Revise the note on sheet 2 to only state "managed slopes". Response: Legend modified to state managed slopes only. 25. [32.5.2(n)] Label blank areas around the water tank with the intended ground cover/surface treatment. Response: Ground areas around the proposed water tank and pump station will have a grass cover. Sheets 5 and 6 have been revised to clarify this requirement. 26. [32.5.2(j,k,1)] Verify that the location(s) of all existing or proposed utilities and utility easements including water, sewer, drainage, telephone, cable, electric and gas are shown on the plan. Label any existing easements with the Deed Book and Page Number. Response: Information available for existing utilities and easements are depicted on Sheets 3 and 4,as well as on the respective sheets for proposed work. Proposed easements are shown on sheets 5, 6,7,8,9, 10, 11 with"DB , PG. "until recordation is complete. Number.Rev 1. Comment partially addressed, once the proposed offsite easements are recorded please revise the plan to provide the DB page information. Response: Acknowledged,information will be provided when obtained. 27. [32.6.2(j) & Comment] Please show utilities and associated easements on the landscape plan to verify that no conflicts exist with planting locations, Response: Utilities and associated easements have been shown on the Landscape Plan(sheet 6)to show no conflicts exist with the planting locations. 28. [32.5.2(n)] Label and provide the dimensions of all proposed improvements. Response: The dimensions of proposed improvements have been shown on sheet 5. NOW °elle aka T r INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 5 of 11 29. [Comment] As proposed off-site easements are required, easement plats must be submitted,reviewed, approved and recorded prior to Site Plan approval. Deed Book and Page reference information of each recorded easement shall be listed on the site plan. Specifically for: "Proposed 20'Permanent Easement", "Proposed Variable Width Permanent Easement" "Proposed 10' Temporary Easement", and "Proposed 20'Landscaping Easement"on TMP 093A1-00-00-00400. Please submit easement plat(s) to the County to facilitate these items. Also, for the landscape easement provide a maintenance agreement which shall be reviewed/approved by the.County Attorney and will be set to record with the plat. Response: As discussed with Mr.Perez,easements plats will be provided to Albemarle County when acquired. The plans have been revised to show a DB,PG reference that can be updated when recordation process is complete. Also,if any work or easements are taking place on TMP 07900-00-00-025B0, which is owned by Robert and Carolyn L1 V crUgood,such easements shall be recorded as v✓ell. Response: There is no proposed work or proposed easement on TMP 07900-00-00-025B0. Rev 1. Comment partially addressed, once the proposed offsite easements are submitted, reviewed, and recorded please revise the plan to provide the DB page information. Response: Acknowledged,information will be provided when obtained, 30. [32.5.2 (lb)]Scale. Pages 6, 7, 8,9,and 10 all utilize a scale of 1" =25'; however, this is not an acceptable scale.Please revise to provide an appropriate scale of either 1" =20' or 1" =40'. Revise. Response: As requested, scales have been changed to 1"=20' for sheets 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 (previously sheets 6-10). 31. [3 2.5,2(a)] General Information. Throughout the plan there are notes which reference various sheets for details to tank,pump, and altitude and pressure sustaining valve vault assembly (see sheet 8);however, none of these sheets or details are provided in the site plan. Either pros idc the sheets or omit the notes on sheet 8. Also, in total the cover sheet lists 32 pages; however, only 15 pages are provided in the site plan set. Please explain why these pages are omitted from the plan.If the pages are to be provided,please add them to the set.If they are not to be provided, omit them from the sheet 1 index of drawings and re-number pages appropriately. Response: As requested,only sheets for the Site Plan are included. A total of 15 sheets comprise the submittal. 32, [32.6.2(g)] All water facilities to be dedicated to public use and the easements for those facilities shall be identified by a statement that the facilities are to be dedicated to the Albemarle County Service Authority, Response:Acknowledged. A note has been added to sheet 2(#22)stating that"All water facilities and water line easements are to be dedicated to the Albemarle County Service Authority". The utilities and easements are shown on Sheets 5-11. 33. [32.5.2e,32.5.2p, 32.6.2(j)], 32.7.9.4] Landscape plan. A landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9 is required prior to the Major Site Plan Amendment approval. The landscape plan shall verify that the site satisfies the minimum landscaping and screening requirements of Section 32. See comments below. Response: The Landscape Plan has been revised based upon discussion with the Albemarle County. Rev 1. Comment acknowledged, See the following comments. Response: See Responses below 'Vow wri I N T E R N A T I O N A L Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 6 of 11 34. [32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7] Screening. Existing trees may be preserved in lieu of planting new plant materials in order to satisfy the landscaping and screening requirements of section 32.7.9 subject to the agent's approval. Specifically some of the existing trees within the proposed 20' landscaping easement are between 20' -80' tall and have a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees present. Please verify the above on the site plan on the existing conditions page and landscape plan. Upon verification, it may be appropriate for the existing trees to be preserved as undisturbed buffer area, as mature trees will provide superior screening of the tower from day one. If the existing mature trees within the 20' landscape easement are determined by the Agent to be adequate to screen the facility the following shall be followed: Response: Existing tree information is provided for the 20' landscaping easement on the existing conditions sheet and the landscaping plan Sheets 3 and 6. The landscape plan should show the trees to be preserved, the limits of clearing, the location and type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching Cr turn l ing proposed beyond the limits of clearing.In addition, the applicant shall sign a conservation checklist approved by the agent to insure that the specified trees will be protected during construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, such checklist shall conform to specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, pp i11-284 through ill-297, and as hereafter amended. This checklist must be signed,dated and included on the plans. Response: The checklist has been signed and included on sheet 6. Rev 1. The existing mature trees are adequate for screening purposes and shall be preserved in the off site 20 foot landscape easement area for screening purposes. Due to the planned grading of the adjacent lot, this site plan shall provide a note on the landscape plan that states, "If the existing preserved trees within the 20 foot off site landscape easement are cut down or die, the easement holder(ACSA)shall he required to revise the site plan to plant the required ed sc,eening per section n 37. 7. 9. 7 of the 4lhemnr-le("twill,ordinance," 4l.cn, it is udvi.cable that the existing preserved trees canopy's be depicted more accurately on the site plan. This ,,,;11 t,.,m aranxint of v,r-oorairra whorl'nr1'ielori,1c tlto ,^o,"ifrl exception request. Response: Note added as requested and the tree canopy has been modified to more realistic dimensions. 35. [32.6.2(j) &32.7.9.4(b), 32.7.9.7(d)] Minimum depth and spacing requirements for a planting strip or existing vegetation. Ifonly a planting strip or existing vegetation is provided as screening, the planting strip or the existing vegetation shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in depth. Ifa planting strip is provided, the plant materials shall consist of a double staggered row of evergreen trees planted fifteen (15) feet on center, or a double staggered row of evergreen shrubs planted ten(10) feet on center, or an alternative vegetative screening approved by the agent. To meet the above requirement the landscape plan shall be revised as follows: • Within the side yard,replace all the 'Nellie Stevens Holly' with evergreen trees, it may be appropriate to continue utilizing 'Leyland cypress' in place of the 'Nellie Stevens Holly' or the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved evergreen tree. Revise to assure double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on center. Also, assure that this planting strip is a minimum of 20'deep, currently its only 14' deep. Also continue the planting strip another 25 feet to the other side of the 'Altitude and Pressure Sustaining Valve Vault Assembly' to completely screen the tower from the r.re NMI I N T E R N A T I O N A L Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 7 of 11 road. Revise. Response: The plan has a 20-foot wide planting strip along the property line. The landscaping has been revised to provide two rows of Leyland Cypress at 15' on center. The rows of tress have been extended as requested to provide further screening of the tank. No trees are planted over the water main. Rev 1. Comment addressed, staff can approve the Leyland Cypress plantings as depicted;however,per discussions with Elaine Echols and Ellie Ray(Landscape Architect)they recommend that the double staggered row of Leyland Cypress be replaced with a mix of(Pinus Strobus Eastern White Pine)and (Cryptomeria japonica &cvs), at a min of 4 foot tall at time of planting. This is being recommended as Leyland's are known to fall down due to wind and are known to sustain substantial damage due to ice.Also the mix of the two evergreen tree types is being recommended to aid in the appearance of a more natural look. Staff expects that the suggested plantings are expected to be looked upon more favorably by the BOS during consideration of the special exception than the Leyland Cypress. Please advise staff how you wish to proceed. Revise if appropriate Response: Revised as noted • Within the proposed 20' landscape easement, if the existing trees are determined not to be adequate or the applicant is unable to preserve them and instead goes with new plantings assure the following is met. Provide another row of evergreen tree in addition to the row depicted to meet the minimum screening, it may be appropriate to continue utilizing 'Leyland cypress' in the second row or the applicant may choose to utilize some other approved evergreen tree. Revise to assure double staggered row of evergreen trees planted 15' on center. Response: The landscape plan(sheet 6)has been revised describe the existing trees and provide a tree save area to provide a natural buffer. 36. [32.6.2(j) & 32.7.9.4(b), 32.7,9,7(u)] Screening. The proposal includes a detentaon pond towards the southernmost boundary of the property This feature is required to be screened from residentially zoned parGCt, 3� 9( )3 Also, with the p ,l clearing is taking place to the property line adjacent to an pGr✓._.1./�UJJ. �1aJV� 'vv . �..,pr:;�:vo .. ....:.b i., .... ..b Y property __. residentially zoned laud, tins k.,leatin8 I.AUJGJ illc 1l ai iilaib' lot to be visible fro-m uic, .'.a.v......u..y �..,...... ......... For both of these items provide screening which meets the requirements of32.7.9.7. Response: As discussed with Mr. Perez,the alignment of the water main on sheet 10 has been revised to provide a natural wooded buffer to screen the bioretention facility. Rev 1. The minimum depth for existing vegetation, if only a planting strip or existing vegetation is provided as screening is 20'deep. In order to meet the requirements of the ordinance the applicant can either provide 20' deep area of existing vegetation, or provide the 10 feet of existing vegetation as depicted and then add a 4'- 6' tall slightly opaque wall or fence to this area. Response: The site layout has been revised to provide a 20' deep area of existing vegetation 37. [32.5.2(n),32.6.2(k)& 4.17] Lighting. Is any outdoor lighting proposed with the site plan? If so, all lighting (including building mounted fixtures)must be shown on a lighting plan that includes a photometric plan, luminaire schedule and cut sheets for each proposed fixture. Response: A lighting plan has been provided on sheet 15 of the Site Plan submittal. Rev 1. Comment partially addressed. On the lighting plan provide the tilt of the fixture, which must be 0 for full cutoff. Also, on the plan provide the required lighting note: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more lumens shall be a full cutoff luminare and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away Michad 13a INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 8 of 11 from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." Also, on the plan provide the light's maintenance factor, which must= 1.0(also known as a light loss factor of 1.0) Response: Comments addressed as requested. 38. [32.5.6(a)] When revisions are submitted,provide a date and description of revision specific to submittal to the County. Response: A revision block has been added to all sheets that were revised from the previous submittal and detailed descriptions of comment responses are included in this letter. 39, In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. Response: Acknowledged 7‘3.77 cnr r rFAvT 40. [Comment)Does the applicant plan on installing a permanent security fence on the property of the new facility? If so,please depict and label it on the plan. If a fence is proposed, staff suggests that it be located as to not be visible from the road and from adjacent property owners. For example on the rear yard it should be located on the property line where the temporary protective,fencing is shown.And for the side yard the fence should be located in_front of the double staggered row of evergreen trees(closest to the tower).Also, if the fence is to be chain link, staff suggests it be a green fence.A wooden board fence is preferred but not required Response: No security fence is proposed. 41 /C'oin;nentJ Once revised please submit 4 hard copies of the revised plan and an electronic PDF copy of the p an for use by Ciauae£te Grant during the CCP review by the Planning Commission. Response: Acknowledged Comments from John Anderson,Albemarle County Engineering (A site plan is a record of zoning compliance on the property. It should not include VSMP plans.) Response: Per discussion with Mr.Anderson on September 9,2014,all erosion and sediment control and stormwater management information and related sheets have been removed from the Site Plan submittal, Code Chapter 18 section 32,part of the Zoning Ordinance. 1, Title pg.-Label major roads on Location Map to help orient project. Response:Major roads have been identified on sheet 1 in the Location Map. 2. Label existing parking,East Rivanna VFD. sheet 4 and across site plan sheets. Response: Existing parking lot has been labeled on sheets 3 and 5. 3. Revise Legend,sheet 2,to include SAF,TS,MU, and TP(VESCH symbols). Response:VESCH symbols have been removed from the Site Plan submittal. 4, Show Managed Steep Slopes on TMP 79-25A on sheets 4,9. Ref.County GIS,Overlay District, and §8- 30.7.5.d.-Re-establish existing grade;do not construct fill or cut slopes on Managed Steep Slopes(none are proposed). at haet.Ba er INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 9 of 11 Response: As requested,Areas of managed and/or steep slopes have been shown on sheets 3,4, 5, 7,8,9, and 10. Refer to the legend on Sheet 2 to identify the symbology. 5. Provide pipe end wall and revised surface contours for proposed 42'L pipe,sheets 5/22, #19, below. Covering exposed pipe(with riprap)is an unorthodox approach. Propose final contours that accommodate pipe with end wall design. Eliminate need to partially embed,leaving exposed,28 LF± of 18" DIA concrete pipe. Response: The 18"storm drainage outfall on sheet 5 has been revised to include an end wall, Additionally, the alignment has been changed to allow the outfall to be directed to the existing site drainage swale. Sheet 13 provides a profile of the storm pipe and associated structures. 6. Sheet 5:It appears that Ex.pavement(VFD) will be cut to install two 18"DIA stoi ni pipes (124', 42'). Furnish pavement cut,repair,depth details. Provide accompanying pavement notes. Response: As requested,a pavement repair details have been included for repairs to Steamer Drive and Glenmore Way. A pavement repair has also been included for the parking lot on the site that will be affected by the installation of the 18"diameter storm pipes.These details are shown on sheet 14. 7, If new easement is required between Glenmore Way(inbound/outbound)in the area north of Steamer Drive (sheet 6), show proposed new temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements. Response:No easements are required between Glenmore Way(inbound/outbound)in the area north of Steamer Drive as this area is right-of-way(ROW). The ROW in this area is now clearly noted. New temporary and permanent ACSA utility easements are shown on sheets 5-11. 8. Sheet 7:Locate drain field on TMP 093A1-00-00-00400 if drain field boundaries known. Response: The approximate location of the drainfields for TMP 093A1-00-00-00400 has been shown on sheets 3 and 7 as requested. 9. Sheet 9/10:Confirm variable width permanent easement is proposed between bracketing,20' wide proposed permanent easements. Response: The , of cascmcnts has been modified with ACSA's concurrence. Permanent water line 1�GJt.1 V1iJG. The depiction J>,�ao�.,i.,i.w has been..,., . .,,. .. „ ., Permanent line easements are now 20 wide. 10. Edit notes,sheet 18,to remove reference to"Station X+XX,""Sheet XX," and"XX-inch culvert." Response: Sheet 18 has been removed from the Site Plan submittal. The sheet will be provided with the VSMP and the references will be corrected. 11, Sheet 18:Revise note to meet VAR10 inspection frequency requirements(VAR10,Part II,F.). Link: h i.... \?. i.'_ _]-<.r-1 __. - '41,7 4 'nitin'a u..i�1�'ni \'.11ir)net11ii!.C,111',1111(i 1(t'ir C11`0 nevi it atin\. Response: Sheet 18 has been removed from the Site Plan submittal. The sheet will be provided with the VSMP and the note will be corrected. 12. Sheet 19: Label Glenmore Way(cul-de-sac). Response: Sheet 19 has been removed from the Site Plan submittal. Glenmore Way(cul-de-sac) is labeled and shown on sheet 11 of the Site Plan submittal. New Comment—Label for 4°Manhole obscures text(sheet 5),•please shift label. Response: Comment addressed as indicated Comments below pertain to required VSMP application: Response: Comments 13—32 will be addressed in VSMP Submittal. `r ..r INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 10 of 11 13. Submit V SMP Application,ref.§17-401, 17-402. 14. Label feature that appears to be a stone entrance,sheet 5. Feature does not appear to be a CE or generator pad(S end of Ex.parking lot). 15. Sheet 7:provide CIP at Ex. 18"RCP storm drain,Inv.388.80,sta.+48,after 12"water line installation is complete. 16. Confirm that project limits of disturbance=1.497 Ac(total Area of Disturbance across all plan sheets. Ref. sheet 18,Existing Site Conditions). 17, Provide orange safety fence(SAF)between project limits and areas accessible to the public:Fire Station, Glenmore Way(including cul-de-sac),and Steamer Drive,per detail,sheet 20. 18. Provide L x W for riprap outfall protection at 62'DIA, 35'Hwatertank,across plan sheets. 19. Provide L x W for revised riprap outfall protection at proposed 42'L @ 2.2%slope 18"DI.A concrete storm pipe (sheet 5,22).-see #5,above 20. Show on-site stockpiles,if any. 21. Identify off-site stockpile,waste,or borrow areas. 72. Revise Management Strategy,Note 6,sheet 18,to reference plan authority authorization and approval needed to remove ESC measures. See Sequence of Construction Note 10, sheet 23,as template. 23. Sheet 18:ACDSM General Construction Notes for ESC plans now number 1-20;please replace 1-22. Link: http://www.albemarle.org/department.asp?department=cdd&relpage=4447 24, ESC:Revise CE labels across plan sheets consistent with Project Narrative, Structural Practices Narrative. Revise CE label to:temporary paved wash rack(PCB). -see sheet 18. 25. Replace or supplement CE detail,sheet 20, with paved wash rack detail,per ACDSM,below. -see #24 26. Sheet 22 appears to provide sufficient information to evaluate SWM plans against Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Redevelopment Worksheet,but reserve comment on SWM plan not yet submitted. 27. Sheet 22:Show bioretention bed W x L dimensions in plan view: 13' x 26'. 28. Sheet 22:Provide 1.1 CFS 100-yr storm event calculations. 29. Sheet 22: Specify frequency for 0.5' depth of water above the bioretention area. 30. Sheet 22:Provide sizing calculations or design summary for grass swales leading to bioretention bed. 31. Submit SWPPP for project,ref. §17-405. LOD,item#16, VPDES Registration statement should match LOD shown on plans. 32. SWM and ESC plans may not include site plan. Remove site plan sheets trom S w IVI L,5t_,plans. A site plan(Amendment)cannot be approved as part of SWM/ESC Plans. Comments from Troy Austin,P.E.,VDOT Land Use Engineer—Culpeper District I. Details for appurtenances that will be located within dedicated right-of-way need to be included on the site plan. More specifically,the details forPRV vault and the air release assembly need to be shown on the site plan. Response: As requested,details for the PRV vault and air release assembly have been included on sheets 12 and 14,respectively. 2. The preference is that the wet-tap to the existing 16"DIP waterline in the cul-de-sac of Glenmore Way be made in the shoulder rather than under the asphalt of the cul-de-sac. Response:Performing the wet-tap connection outside of the pavement limits was examined during design.However,there are existing water service connections that required the wet-tap to be performed in the pavement.The approximate locations of existing water service connection have been shown on sheet 11 for clarity. During construction,ACSA will oversee the work and evaluate if actual field conditions allow the wet tap to be moved to the shoulder. 3. A Land Use Permit will need to be obtained from this office for all construction activity occurring within dedicated right-of-way. This permit should be obtained prior to commencement of construction activity. Response: Acknowledged w✓ wwie &eelB INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez November 5, 2014 Page 11 of 11 New Comment. 1. For additional protection of the PRV vault please provide reflective delineator posts at its corners closest to the edge of pavement. Since the top of the vault will be exposed 6"it is felt that the delineators will guide operators away from the vault during mowing or snow removal operations. Response: Bollards are provided at the corners of the vault. Building Inspections-Jay Schlothauer 1)No comments or conditions. Response: Acknowledged Fire and Rescue-Robbie Gilmer 1) No comments or conditions. Response: Acknowledged E911-Andrew Slack 1) Approved Response: Acknowledged ACSA No comments provided as they are the applicant. Response: Acknowledged Thank you for assistance in this project. If you have any questions or require additional information,please do hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, MICHAEL BAKER JR.INC. Chip Votava,P.E. Project Manager CFV/rfg *41 tir/ Michael Baker Innovation Done Right...We Make a Difference INTERNATIONAL March 25,2015 Mr.Christopher P.Perez Senior Planner Department of Community Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road,North Wing Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 RE: SDP-201400054 Glenmore Ground Storage Tank,Pump Station,and Water Main Project At East Rivanna Fire Station—Major Site Plan Amendment ACSA Project 2013-04 Dear Mr.Perez: The following responses to County comments,dated September 30 and October 3,2014,are provided. All former comments and responses are included in our response letter. New comments and responses are provided in bold text. Comments by Christopher P.Perez, Senior Planner,Dept.of Community Development • c u'. Rev 3.The Special Exception for setbacks was approved on Dec 3,2014 by the BOS Assure the following note is provided on the cover sheet of the site plan under setbacks: 272 Bendix Road,Suite 4001 Virginia Beach,VA 23452 RPF: �m IL PA u ,/SALLYPORT MBAKERINTL.COM Office:757.463.8770 1 Fax:757.463.0503 or v.✓ Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 2 of 12 "Setbacks for the Water Tank are 1 to 1 based on tank height. The tank is 35' tall. Special Exception was approved on Dec 3, 2014 by the BOS to allow a 32-foot side setback and a 20-foot rear setback subject to the following conditions: 1. The Albemarle County Service Authority (the"Authority")shall obtain a landscaping easement (the "Landscaping Easement") on Tax Map and Parcel Number 0931A1- 00-00-00400 in the location shown for the"Prop. 20' Landscaping Easement"on the Site Plan—Grading Plan and Landscaping Plan(the"Plan", last revised November 4, 2014,attached hereto, subject to the following: A. Any tree shown on the Plan whose trunk is located within the Landscaping Easement shall be preserved and maintained by the Authority; B. If any tree within the Landscaping Easement dies, is removed, or is otherwise cut so as to no longer provide the screening intended by this condition as determined by the Director of Community Development, the Authority shall promptly submit a landscape plan that complies with Albemarle County Code§ 18-32.7.9 and which will provide screening as provided by Albemarle County Code § 18-32.7.9.7; C. After the landscape plan is approved by the County, the Authority shall install and thereafter maintain any landscaping shown on the approved landscape plan; D. The Zoning Administrator may allow minor variations in the location of the Landscaping Easement provided that the screening purpose of the Landscaping Easement is satisfied; and E. The deed of easement and easement plat for the Landscaping Easement shall be subject to review and approval by the County before they are recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County,Virginia. 2. If the Authority does not obtain the Landscaping Easement as provided in Condition 1, it shall: A. Submit a landscape plat that complies with Albemarle County Code§ 18-32.7.9 and which will provide screening as provided by Albemarle County Code§ 18-3 .7.9.7 to the equivalent extent practicable that would have been provided under Condition 1,as determined by the Director of Community Development; and B. After the landscape plan is approved by the County,the Authority shall install and thereafter maintain any landscaping shown on the approved landscape plan." Response: Notes have been added as requested. `r.r, Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P. Perez March 25,2015 Page 3 of 12 ,III! 1 :,tt 1 . r ( I�'!t tul I`!jt,"I:.,. .: I',t .,,� :i;, li.j H -.I ■:!„I I II l' Srtll(!. ii, j' , 11, . I- . I,i t l I 11'1:`s , Ol,. III ::I IiI- •II'. '�,li: .�! :I•��..,., If Iu , :i t Ir 'i II1” „i`li „ ;i;. : II, I,tl -I C'llifI: i 1 `I: .!` 11,,, I: . 4. ,i 4..4 , • 1:1;,1;1 „ fr; ,•I_..f I',rt'L' "11I i I 'I.!I' !I i Iii i', `} =;I ! {I,+ ( .t 1, }. ,1., t( i,', I!'. 111;i: !'},: , '14.1 r I I " I _,,I, f f .,: ul!`•'I )I' . .I 'i t' .• 11,111 II',41,141. uI I,. , ..1!I \I Ult,1;1�\ li!. Illit „I .I. "!t } f' , ' .n ;, (n .!; .., 1 !' illil` '4'1.14Ir01 ,,: V\01, . I !III I1 'It, 1 \,i. I . I'll" .I' I ,:I`' :, !, If f HI, , ,:, i .1 I':,,,1 .,;" H!; '1 ! ' H . ,,,11•.1 r,: i'I: ,ttl ' I'■1'..11■11,' II, ,.1,'i!, :� :,i, `,11,'11 ''11;1rl'i■i!..II', \ I :_ f! at ',l i !I!. III,( Il�' 1 I I L.-I to 1, .. II1!f .,ii •II ( If' ..,, i u. ,ii-:: 'I t '-1In • , , ' I 1.1 .'I , -u!t i., ., �!If I. :11 .'1, , t 4";I' �• 11 ! u •••1, .; I, • • : ,••lf. : 11:11 d i ' 1. ,. u 1 ii, I' .'n i, I! . i . Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 4 of 12 yl"ltll, il, lil li 1111,'0: 'I' iIL .?t• �! !l ; ••\ 0111- , I;,! ,,,!Ili, . ; , �� •Ili :t �, I!ii'i i i+ ,I�IF Ii.�:ll !� ,a 4i1 ; ii .. . 11,1; ;,I, ,. 'f,E Ill }�„ ■II,;I(!• ,! f1,11, Ii,.. ,,is "W. IIIIti'il ,'i !+ I' 1.'l'. 1, ,f III 1� I i, t 1,,H` i• ` `.! 1 ltl,1''.i , 't ill .111 ,I1', .I\ .,.11;t lii ll is ,' {.111' \;;,, 1 ,,t,:i hlli;t I t4-u :. i ! 1, u'. I,.,. p.,01!11 ;! 1,_ i ,', 1H !HUI: ;1.■141 , .I l; �, +,.. , ;w 1'1, I,1. „ ,fi "l Il' (i;l I,. �i`i j�I4 1`t—..41i '1(1 "[:,1;, .,1!i, ,. , , .. II H., ll�, ,4 i .i1 tll—I('I�. il�+• 1.�t I: 1IR H■.1 il,t_ ul: i,', ., t'l I, I !s _ ii •.14 1 .,;un-t,' I'uli.!u•. 'I :, ;1,< !+I ';'++ ,'.i ,.n„1, - � ,III 111- l' 'I: ! f +' i,ii J �7H''li. ,il , 1” 'R I i4 , , , : • 1 I .. ;Ii,"I.. 11 iil. •, lilt .f', li— 'lei, .. !'�. ,i: ICI li, .r ll; i ii i!. ,. —!i, , ;,{171'. rj. 1 - ,i .. 1 ., i ti, - - '1; is .. • Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 5of12 i ! i, ili, I.: .i .,l I;.. Is ii :, , - :,. ,,� : li li , 1•• '�I:I E'. lil,li l,�. �i i•, �1; �: 1,11 I ,, I brill ;,^, , ,i, a ni I;. I ,Iri !nl ii, I' ,, Is r 1, .i -:i „n,i II. 1; „ - „ , , : . . 'i`. iiGU (1'i: , ,,:i', !i1 I „ ,:i` , ,•.I,tl : i .i. , „ I,(ti !!' ! .t (!., 11. , i ■I':, ..i .. �', leis!', i!t , .li �. I,. iil' nn., _. ,�„ , i - - .i•i:, . -,L, .1 '.,L ■,I Rev 3. omment still relevant. Once the proposed onsite and offsite easements are recorded ple e revise the plan to provide the DB page information. Please be aware that what is picted on the recently submitted easement plats for the project do not match that which is depicted on the site plan.Assure these two documents match. Response: Easement labeling has been revised to match deeds and plats. Deed book and page references are now included. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 6 of 12 L,1 1 111, I: II { \11" 111.'- ,F,..,, !.,. I';1 ll!• 3.i I!'. 1 ....1` I.• i 1. ,'■• I.,• Ht il!. II ti + .;I, , .`1 , 1., , ill . 1111:.1 11', 1 IL, h,.'11 i. 1-'• In i, • . 1"( 1 11 . ,I'11 • .1r h.1._ki k' II t,,. •,,..•r' `1; .1• • 11 '1'. 11 ,,. +, is n'I'I` 11ik- i�Il,lf! 1`111, •,,1 1 \II' • , ,I 1.,11 .11 01111 11 1 1%1 1'1'1. ...11 ,, .. '-11,111 i„ 1..1;, i';-.•1'■∎i: 111,1k 1 1'I+ -1.11.11!1 1 1 i' '1' •' ' 1 .. H 1ni 1'( i 1.', , • ,,1111■11 1' „„ • .;t1t 11 it l !' 1."'.,1 •II ;I' �.I ` .I .. I' '1i. •7111.1 , ;+', . 1"' +� -� ,, !�,. 1. i1�{•11., i'). I'. . .r f 11 ;{: 1 •{ 11. lit i, II 1 1 , . ,.i• ,i 1,. Rev .The proposed offsite easements have been submitted and are being reviewed.Please be are that what is depicted on the recently submitted easement plat for the project does not match that which is depicted on the site plan. Assure these two documents match. Once they are approved and recorded in the clerk's office please revise the plan to provide the DB page information. Response: Easement labeling has been revised to match deeds and plats. Deed book and page references are now included. tit,,! 1' !I'1 X11 , it will ' I i I i ll 1•- 1i .. ,. 1. i. •.it:i ..��, • ! - 11.,, • t; - '1. • ,1, , 1', 1.,i 1. i, ..'I i,..��1 I ..I• I. ;i, i!! .i" 1' .j ,. 1! , • . 111 i, ., :1. ,. 1 ,f '1' ,1.. i: iI�, . , t'. , , , 1It . Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 7 of 12 lu! 2.,11111., 1..!k}•J :j' it: ,l1,.1 ., ,. I,E t„ , HE, , i It, `' . :11E1,°:li 1„ j1, Ij 1.2 ,1. ' ! j 2'12,I- I } � ., .� 12°t 1! I LJI •2 It.. 2 12; ,12 . i,- ( ' 1.i 1'11:1,. li•t..,!.,.i,,,.. NJ, -.I.i • ' !(, , - i1. :.; ' ,• 'L_tl t,i • 'I 'li , Il, „i.i`i'. lilt' i,.:,t+`;,1}li[I, 'I'1 •;t',;:. :5:. 11` : i, - i .,■ (li, .- '; ,.1 � tip', -;li;,'jj\ - , , I!1'. ,.il:. I•. ., � I! � -'i1 i ,,, ,. i1 L. H.!;.; I}i. I'tii :.it , .;' „ I }' .i i;�(,i ,I I'' 1 Il ;W..; ' , .� ,,.. il' !'• !,' {; - H1I _ 11,,111 ,i , 11, li 1' s i, ;HI' . ii. Il. . ill ii ;1• III' ;t1k, ;!, l ;t!1 � ,'; ' il, �,:, 1!1 ,� t', '' j.. • !i ,i i 't I:. ;hi., I�. �,d I t i .1,1!,t I!;,.i a'.. I`. Ilk.I . 'I', i! ! II; ;,I' !il, t '•.1-.i II . ,111.1 II!, :!lt.}`, ,l. PLO] i;, c ,.,n ! ii, j„ ,:}` Kilt ° „I!1 -I. l,. lt,; 1;, •■ I , ,, ! lil' , i-. } t ' iI I!„ !, il, ,ii: ;d, li,L;';', „(!11!1111, 11H ', II` .,, .;.HE 112, EL2 HIE;j2 it!:,II, E2,1,2 L 'f: 2., ,. }i1iL, ;H( }• •2211 Ili , ,},}1111111 ;I1, I p(1}It,•;E; LI:,11I .I ,;, , ,1.i , , , , I , i,il., 1 t EN 2, S i ;It . EE; i, 1:, . 11E. 1I„1 I i.; 1 11 j'H j 1 1,'I:, ICI I I, !t i, 1 1 , ; 1 , , {!-: i' .11E2 . !• .s , 1: ;i„ ,1'- '1, I .III :{ H LLILIE I,'.c Ii'. '.I'. .. ;2! .1, , - 21;2 21• ;1E1, .. , . . ! ,t ,E!I. ,1..11 ':l; i Uilll,;j It,tlull,;I;,t, j .'j ll:.: , 1E 1 11.' 2 ;� ,,,X1,'.7 : 1 I„ ' I:( , 1 i i. 'I:. .!i:'WI.' „ , „■11 ;II, j' , . ; t. • .. , '1 i !Ir !I: ,�'! , 'i ;'."-� t•1'. '. '1`. ft, 11111 , (��,.. ,. ! j„ t1 , I •.! i. • 1 22 ;111E ...i, 12.2 i, , 1 „ 11:E' Rev 3. O eet 6, please omit the previously requested note to avoid conflict with the con ' ions of the Special Exception approval by the Board of Supervisors. Remove the following to from the plan: "If the existing preserved trees within the 20 foot off site landscape easement are cut down or die, the easement holder(ACSA)shall be required to revise the site plan to plant the required screening per section 32.7.9.7 of the Albemarle County Ordinance." Response: Note has been removed. • • • .4110. •4•I' Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 8 of 12 ( itL ?!,:. :11' ',c ill!i;.'![: ?I( li !,tli,l•., , , H '. ! !' f . . ;,,11-, • j.. , 1111!il', "li?.,IT: ! i,HiJ l \}1 :, 1 I i ., _ !!, :! ■.I :I. (:, 11It, 11 s, } !;4;Ii, , ! rl,!:lt'1 i•, . :l .ul: l . • i,. n; .tJ •1' , !, (L .I, si'(I : ,'ill ll; :, :�4' -' .. �i!?I, •;j;l' ,',I;.'4 ,. . : : 'i;4' 1'I; t'! `11111';1; ! i'i,_ .tilt ',u•lHirli,lt • .n,i,i` h. i\ 1 I , :., I�t•L`. . 111' !s!,1?I II;I' ,l 2II-It1,:t `t jilt {` ;I I:,lI; .!III' :,, ,. Ili. Ilit,l, i' ,11 . I ,s. ,n :1`ll:. I,t\ :. I:. . i`. ,I „ . 4t \I(!l \\t) itl`.\ „1 I .■!!,_ f t.'; ' ! 'Ii s, ,141 111, !,:, "'i it " 11i41‘,. 1 1t l 11 ."•,11 !1510 cl 'I lt'li,l, •!,ti Is }:1(I`,l(N' .ii I!,'i 11'...' ( I .t l..01, lI„ .:t !` 41:_,. 1'\: , 1u■,1'4 i.t 1 1 , sII 11 ;ICI(I Il.,`.'.I. `l1.i11 I ;ill ,:1,1'1t''1c 111. 1 i 1111 1 I/5 }'II, Ii ,. =1I 11t It t! tll�, ti• ;1` Ill: 1 I,I!I'. I (IIs;I` ,:ill) 11!!4' I<.,\ (! ;411,1., ;i■Ti' t\ ,,1 I \I;tlR1 ( ,}\?t ., h:. ll!.I.1._ ,I ,\lilt ,I I :: , . ! :;'a;!! u' I , 4. , . \\ 1;11' t' 11,! 4 'I. .,I J`i:1:41 X11•' 1 141 14. 4: {l(I 1 c .?1101 ,n, ! I ,_ti I,) l',11 (-1()"\\ (III 1st t,•. 111,1 ,,I:.t ,4i. :. .. •115.11!; „ 1,.:4!t. '4' ,{Ii ,• \!. II U.+ I',I . i . ,,,. ,., ,•It , •„!, 1 ■ 'c': 4 !14, 'I 1,1 1, 1 ,, II:, - ,,(i l 4 !.;l ilr. `u1 `l,, i'I, !11144' .tic .i !., .. i'. • , ' ,II, (''I' 1. ! :111,1.I,. ?I ttl III' }'1.'1;11 t I'iI, tl ;il I!.: ! ' L,,. i i ,4 I 4 it I: e 0, I!, 1' "'!t'tt ;11 ., 4. ! I: I•, Ii •!i• :1,. Is .`1'. s I ill'. .i1 11'0,4 ,. .,,t I' Is II'Iii It ;ft.% 15. .'1?!-' 'is ? ,I it�tul'. Iii!'' i ' ,if, li '!:_ _ 1'150 i t 'i. !(' 'I I!I t! • Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 9 of 12 11;111Hk:ilk. , [H,11c- I I I, • , I_ , 11■1.“ L„,.i,)11\ II , hi, t■ •I ,l( ' , , CL V H H • HO I ii IVV C I Willi ,LI ,:„. H VI itild ti\ it ...it,. • C IV IC I I Ii I II• 1111C'' t'l . , :t. kit. Ilk Itt.tliC't illtitlIII 11.'ht I L.,(II'. i I 1 ' lilitit it.tit:. `.1 ftt•t '\\ it. ttti.1111111111'ti. 1,•.■\ I.:. .1 ; HcH 1., \ 1)1,, h IC II I CIV VI , VV VII ..i- :LH L, i.1.1;■II. I; ci. I '..,.■1.111 VVVIIVV IV IVIVVIIVIIV - IVVVVIV V ,,.1, , VII CVI,• I V i I HIVVVI ii t. pi lit III tIdIllt v' all Crt ,Iiit't 1111.1, VIVV V I V IV VVIIVV V VVVIVVVVV 1,•;1_1 ,H II ,1 • VII L IV VVIVI I,I CI I I 1 1,!HI]ii VVVVIVVVVVIV I II VVVV V V VI V V VVVI ■V. .1 I V V V 1 ; • t ; 1.11 I ,;FC H.11, I ■I i • ( VIVV VVVVIVVVVV 'V I IIVVVVCV 1‘ I V VIVVVVIIV !IIVVVVVVIVVVVVV HI I. :I ,1.1! VP ■•I' I I. I • • I • • I I r r.r Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 10 of 12 ��. p■ll' \ ! `-i 11 :ui' '1` 1::1\, f:+ , v !, 11,-n! IL, ' I' 1`I. '. •.l;3 til .'.I. „ I u I " 11, ii, .t I 4 : . ;r .i l• t. , :,! .'i�I111 ,.t :., ! _ i!; i .j .I. •i I ,1:. 11,1'.‘It tI_ {-_ ::- I i!e�. ,,.. .,.. 1 �..i. i't.." �'. :I '1 1 l i' :� ; ! !• tit, �, . .-,,,1 it `'}. . . t. ,,1: !,,!' I ;!1111 11 + ll `1.111!1 .,uti+ .,, }: .i. ? I }I` _ .I!: , i., ,■ ,I I'i1:_ ,,. I: ll;t 'ill !,_ ,!!: !ii..'1:ill lil• I11 ,. I' IHt .",,;I .,'.:i, il!' III. „ 1111.l� : , I.!1 �✓ii I ifil.'L'. i!1":',I t1, 1),011,,11\ ..!?I -.ti i :I.— 1 I .I�t. It, I ,Ii'!!11 (.l!,i lls,!`' ,,t,11„", 1-11 ti H MR Hal; n , Rd \ H I I! ■TII,TnIAT,I It ;t11+ ;ll .'I1. :t ,, . < .., , .,, !: II:, I ITT IT !'I,:1 1 l t' t,1 ,I t t n ,! .. - : •1 !Il';. , 1 "'III :{ 1`., , ?il(,\ I I}) ,,tII1 it:-I''i! ., I, 1II \ I IM?!;, . lli�l , ::! i.•.{ ;:I tl I,I I: la Ii I- 1'I i11 Isk t,'1!!I .l i` Ird' ;'�. i:l. III 1 „ 1`:. 1','if�. _ it till:'•!l li. ,+ 1'.1\� +It '11 i,II,til {�i i!' 1!, ! ll} ilh1.•,i i.+I i� .,! I, :I!!u I 1)i .t1 .;I'_ .. \1 -' li1 , life I}! 1HI'+.il �,i ;i l.., 1 I!t 1t1. ,; : !; !'..':.ii 11 ii 1`.11+ 1-■ .',ii•, !,,I i ` i,i, iii`.! Ittl ,i 111 II! i;: „i:' iI t. !: I ?j e ,, , ,il 'i ;n' ‘,11 •I:. . .t1 I. I" .!,1li. .11;I' .``l , :1 I !I!t•, I<. i"Ii•t' t !:.!j, ll ti I` .,•, { ■.. : 1:. H. �+ !t. • • I. :II: • ! . .• , I , . .: ..s !I,: `I+ Iii 'i: :: ,! _ :;. - + , ti.r �•1✓ Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr.Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 11 of 12 )i' ;:,?,?t, a -. ;1, 14 ui`- I J. t', 11t1 FJ iI t1,1((.1[111C11 ! j , '1•W t.lii ;1) • I:, , ,,i, ;l'l li' 1 `.. K( I' 11,;111. 11,1 H' '. „I.. :. . i1;!, H• i1111i, 1 i•. 1111•1.1. 1�, { U,I�;11111I F pI• j?i:1(1j` .,I ,{I••li:;i`.,!i.,.• 1 -1`, .. it .,1, .-. ,: '1 I ', I?:„11, ,n i '! Ili,,,l `,t:,,, i'. •,,. 1 •1. 1 i�:1i,'. `'Ijt'l • Ii,liiltal-) 1 1.1 ,!,I, .',r. ,;?; ii,,,1 i` `,l , (!Lil■•• ..11 . 1, , ••11,1 1•• \.., 1 t.1 t1, r Hill til,..,11;, I I it ,i., •; H 1 1; ,,,i•. I , I' , •■I■I.11s,',1i11:,1i 1:,,.iL',1,,111 „■ I, ''I ii i I'. i`' ? , 1 \ \1 il`i „\I•C,: l'? .!(' t iiF I;IVipii;R', 'it,., '! 1 it 1,, • tl -.- . ,! - ,I„1.. ., il.`, t ",t!t'(. •it'illll'ila• ill, , 111, •ii; 41. ..1'111 jO r. • ,..I'nl, ,■., •.! , ,I,,,1-.01/1 ,\,:1 It nr I,111 1;�\\ 1'1' t? 11 1111 111 �•L.�!' `�', 't'to 'IIt i 1 !�'' !!' .'it i t tit'; JOIL. ,'ll,• .:III:, , '1: .1 .1,1 , !I I!, ,,1 { 1. ,'1,'\. `',( "11, tit',, .,lil,.il'., 1'1 11, '1.- -.,11. li • ,f-;, 1 1` , 1,, ( ..11( .+ 1 i11, ii , ,{,, 11, , 't 1 1. . i:, ' 1 .,'I'.. 1 1 1 . t' .,(! . 111 11, ._ , 1 01`111..,:i .`.! 1;, 1'.1'1! 1: ..=tl,t. 111 l.i • 1 ! ;.1!'. i`.,, 11. 11 111, ,` I II ,'.It \"”' 1 I<, 1!1"7 : t I 111.'1 111. `-Ik 4•I .`„ ,,, II11 i .,1',F , ..`1, .1.i !-, ..{ 1 , 11. 1111,.,1„r a , J,'I, ., .f 1 .'11 1'H:,, 11 OH 11, ., , 1; I' I • 0' • ..1 11„ '1 1 1 • • • • • 1 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Mr. Christopher P.Perez March 25,2015 Page 12 of 12 1 ,1 Pciii,1 ' Ili ut,'tt i,:l'n n!1{,:I' , 1 , 1, I. , <. ,.. H ! ' H a\ I III .I;i1, -I (Ht! 1',t 'i'1. : 1 \'5■1 'I1. ∎.._li„ ,I1.. l,j, 1 ,il , . Ii ii: I s . . 1(11; ., (,,,.Il ■,1 U! tk 1'10t .:!1( j,11. ,'-t .),1 ,11'' i■ ' '1 .II j , i ,.'ll .I::•c ;1;, ,:{'.'c Lt .'I' .i'l NI. , „1 I!:, ..11:11 .i'll ■, H.,,, 1, i. 1 Jl.'1 .I1 (I. n:. Ill . Hi'l ,I',1:. ■ l.■,l, i" '1' ,i t l l i l i' ,1 1:. ;I I t ■'i I 1,,\\ Ik H \,Ii 1'1',.1; , PC,1 ,,ti,t : li, ILPIH., .,1, hl t \icitl! di ill. 0,i;'r.1'. ::1 Ilk .:Ulii Bollards at the corners of the vault are considered a fixed object hazard since they are within the clear zone of the roadway.We are not as concerned with the vault causing the hazard.We are more concerned with the vault becoming damaged or VDOT equipment becoming damaged during mowing or snow removal operations. Please provide flexible reflective delineator posts. See sections 6F.73,Tubular Markers,or section 6F.88, Delineators,of the latest Virginia Work Area Protection Manual. Response: Tubular Markers are provided as shown on Sheet 12. it, J.i) I1:,o., ill:,,. .1.l\ ',:Ill„tll.,lucr 1 - ,, .. '11, .'I ilcil'i, 11 I lit ch.' I , ., ,1t 1.1'1'!: , l∎Iiiil,t i I 'r ti k..,-I !, I 1 1. 11. ili . its 1 I, is 1 ii. Thank you for assistance in this project.If you have any questions or require additional information,please do hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ICHAEL BAKER JR.INC. i 1 / //i, sz Chip Votava,P.E. Project Manager CFV/rfg