Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA200100015 Presentation ZMA 2007-09-10r.� Martha Jefferson at Peter Jefferson Place Architectural Review Board Work Session # - latthews Development Company LLC eptember 10, 2007 w ' f �� ' LLSL�lY11111Y541lA�LSS1l :�II� LINNDSWE UVOYD .'f erson at Peter Jefferson Place _-D IlMaHhews -L-1 Review Board Work Sessi6n #2 SHEET (D L'102J "_� A -:'I 1 NORTHEAST f., Gun news Development Company LLC Saptemb,pr 10, 2007 MIA V VPIKR PARX �_2,4c --- — ---- --- - ------------------- ---------- MARTHA dEFTEF-SM �MNTAL PARKWL STRUCTURE 75 Cb QP OAFA UWE C VnLjYy PLAW 40 =2 r- 41 — 4 rh=- rer IV ET SHEET L103 L164 OU7HWESTSOUTHEAST ;t 4 AM PRtUMNARY UGG Martha Preliminary Site Plan Submittal sAftews jefferSon Hospital *kr'k.?,7M KaWrSlater Martha Jfferson at Peter fefferson Place Architectural Review Board Final Site Development Plan Submittal Matthews Development Company LLC March 31, 2008 COUNTY OF ALSEMARLIE Depariment of Cummuoity development 401 Me[ntireRoad, North'Wing Charloltmille, Virginia 22902-9596 Phone (434) 296-5$32 Fax (434) 972-4012 October B. 2007 Martha Jefferson Hospital Foundation CIO Mike Mathews 459 Locust Ave Charlottesville, Va 22902 RE: Martha Jefferson Hospital at Peter Jefferson Place Dear Mike, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on September 17, 2007, held a work session on Mantra Jefferson Hospital at Peter Jefferson Place- Ttie ARB had the following comments: 2. 3- 4. 5. a. a. The mortar color should be chosen by preliminary site plan. "Concept" colors will be Sufficient. Lighting on the roof is a concern. Location of the helicopter pad should be identified due to the lighting concerns. Anyventsiexhaust towers should be painted rather than shiny (like bare stainless steel). Utility elements and mechanical equipment shall not be visible from EC. Maming)Wate6als should be identified. It was suggaated that more than 1 calor prick be used - The ARS wants to see a normal submission, but will not be Comperned with finer details. Colored 1132" elevations may be sufficient. Lighting and landscape plans will be required. Include rooftop garden elements. You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and schedules are available on-line at www.albamarle.orgiplanning. Drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing- Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identity those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding' or byolher means will facilitate review and approval. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me. S ince rely, xo_t Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner Kahler Slater expenerice design March 31. 20DB Ms. Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner, County of Alb Department of Community Dew 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Martha Berson at Peterjfferson Place � _kehlerslster.cum AreBitectural Rev ew &-d Final Site Development Plan Submittal Milneukes Kohler Slater, Inc, m8cm0" Martha Jeffarson Hospital. Project 206100.01 9roenlc Bu dintio�NC Architectural Review Board Final Site Development Ptan Submittal March 31, 2008 Page 2 111 was, Wittentin ,Avenue Mi1wa4ke9,w15]2N.2W1 USA P4I9.2t2.2009 F414.272.20D1 3, Locarfon of the befico Wer vad should be identified due to the li htin concerns. - The heliped is not included in this initial phase of work so 45 Mf Itbe_ D-dopmau Company TIC lighting concerns are no longer applicable. March 31, 2oo8 Re: Martha Jefferson Hospital at Peter Jefferson Place Architectural Review Board — Final Site Development Flan Submittal Dear Margaret: We appreciate the opportunity to continue to work with the Architectural Review Beard and present the development of our project_ As a follow-up to our March 19, 2007, work session and our second September 17, 20G7, work session, our planning has matured through design development, and we are prepared to share additional information with you. In fact, our plans have advanced to the point that we are presenting the Final Site Development Flan Submittal. Thereare s few planning revisions since we met last_ The most significant modification that you'll see from the Entrance Corridor vantage paint is that the 5 - level Parking Deck is not indicated in the current plans and photos. The Helipad is also not included in the submitted plans. Both the Parking Deck and Helipad remain components of the hospital campus masterplan, but neither will be included in this initial phase of work- Other changes since our last work session include the integration of the freestanding Support Services Building into the hospital footprint and an approximate 5'-0" reduction of the overall hospital building height_ Previously, the freestanding Support Services Building was closest to the 1-64 Entrance Corridor_ The hospital footprint location has remained the same_ We would like to address the issues raised during our last work session as indicted in your October 8, 2007, letter (attached)_ 1. The irwtsr color should be chosen by preliminary site plan- `Concept` colors w#1 be suffrcmar. - We have included photos and samples of our palette of exterior materials, including proposed mortar calors for brick and stone veneers. 2. Lfghrenq on rhe roof is a concern. - We've included site and building lighting plans in this submittal and a photometric plan and fixture specifications with appropriate cut-off that limits light spill beyond paved areas of the site_ Just to note again, the parking deck is not included in this initial phase of work, so Previous concerns regarding lighting the top floor of the deck are no longer applicable. 4.Any verntslaxhausf towers should be pamttsd rather than shiny (kke bare stainless steel). - Any exposed vents or mechanical equipment will he located behind scrasned walls or painted to match the exterior building colors. 5. 1169t elemenrs and mechanical a rrl menr shall not be visiWe front EC. - Any axposad vents or mechanical equipment will be located behind screened walls or panted to match the exterior hUilding colors_ 6. Ntass+irafMaierfafs should be identified. It was suvnesfed that more Than One U1 color 6*k be used. - We have included photos and samples of the palette of exterior materials and the requested elevation drawings. The pTi nary materials include a composition of one brick color, natural stone, and clapboard siding to blend argdn,Cally into the site - 7. The ARB waf is ra $00 a normal submission, but will nor be concerned with finer derails. Colored 1132' eievarions may be sufficient- - We are suhtnitting the required items for the ARB Finaf Site Development Plan application. L'de have included the requested exterior elevation drawings lat 1132" scala} as seen from the Interstate 64 Entrance Corridor view point in this submittal. 8. Lighting and landscape plans wiff be required, lnolude ,&0fj&,0 OaPdOn aMrrynts. - Lighting and landscape plans are included in this submittal. The rooftop garden is being designed for future sail and planting leads, but will initially be covered with dark -colored ballast. We hope the responses listed here answer the questions appropriately. We look forward to discussing this next submittal with you and the Architectural Review Board. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions Or would like additional information in advance of the meeting. With hes e��z an HA Pri f U(;= Ri)rl Cottrell and Barbara Eliar, Martha Jefferson Hospital Mike Matthews, Matthews Development Company Martha jfferson at Peter jfferson Place Architectural Review Board , Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan Matthews Develop Company LLC May 79, 2008 - A - r, r� k.. k i q1 i i 0, Martha Jfferson at Peter j&rson Place ;. Architectural Review Board Final Site Development Plan Submittal Matthews Development Company LLC March 31, 2008 hvised Junes, 2008 f 1W r Martha Hospital Campus Masterplan Jeffers on Hospital m -,o 3,.2aoa Gourrrr OFAL9EMARLS D apartment of Comm u n ityr ❑evelopme nt dal McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 229024$98 Phone OU) 296-5832 Fax {434) 972-4126 July 2g, 2008 Matthews Development Company do Mike Matthews One Boar's Head Pointe, Suite 131 Charlottesvil le, VA 22903 RE: ARB2008.00048 Martha Jafferson Haepi•.al Tau Map 76, Parcel 20M Dear Mike. I have reviewed the repent submittals for the above -referenced proposal, including- r Exhlblt C revised June 6. 2008 + EL100 Site Plan — Lighting revised 5115108 Landscape plan sheets LSI-LS5 revised June 10, 21)08 (received July 28, 2008) Glass specifications Lighting tut sheets MechanicM equipment screening information The revisions included In thls information resolve the outstanding conditions of ARB approval. However, please nate that the lighting rut sheets must appear on a sheet in the site plan set. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness. This appilcation is approved with thecondition that mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. Also, this approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change In the approved design or materials will require an amendment to this plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Boa rd. It you have any q uesnons, please do not hesitate to contact me_ Sincerely, Vargaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc. Maruna Jefferson Hospital, clo Barbara Bias, 459 LoQuetAve., Charlottesville, VA 22902 *abler Slater, Inc., do Allan Krueger, 111 West Wisconsin Ave., Mitwaukee VVI53203 Summer Frederick, Current Developmerd ARE File