Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP201500020 Review Comments 2015-06-04Short Review Comments Report for: SP201500020 SubApplication Type: CVS at Rio and 29N Special Permits Date Completed:06/04/2015 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:I have reviewed the above referenced application and have no comments. The ACSA hereby recommends approval of SP201500020. Division: Date Completed:05/18/2015 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:ARB-2015-45: CVS Initial Plan - Initial Site Plan and Special Use Permit for a drive-thru (TM 061000000123F0 and 061000000123G0) Regarding the Special Use Permit: Motion: Mr. Missel made a motion to forward the following recommendation to the Planning Commission regarding ARB-2015-45: CVS Initial Plan - Special Use Permit for a drive-thru. The ARB has no objection to the request for the Special Use Permit for a drive-thru window. Mr. Lebo seconded the motion. The motion carried by a vote of 4:0. Division: Date Completed:04/30/2015 Reviewer:Francis MacCall Admin Zoning Review Review Status:QC OK Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/19/2015 Reviewer:John Anderson Engineering Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:Special Use Permit Narrative (that accompanies SP Application) states that “drive-thru pharmacies are needed and beneficial to the public,” and that “existing bank at 1700 Seminole Trail has a drive-thru currently, so the drive-thru is an existing condition on site.” 18-4.12.6, Drive-in lane serving any use, directs design/review to consider “a combination of traffic generation figures either known to the industry or estimated by Institute of Traffic Engineers.” [ITE] Also: “The stacking spaces shall be designed so as not to impede required parking spaces, pedestrian or vehicular circulation.” Comments: 1. Design impedes circulation (vehicle access: in/out) from west entrance (Balmun, LLC; TMP 04500-00-00-105A0). 2. Design provides 80’ stacking, at most. Revise to accommodate five vehicles, or 100-ft, total, per LINKS below. (third link: ITE) 3. Recommend revise CS-101 to show placement of five vehicles in the drive-thru, graphically. Show vehicles requiring 20-ft/Ea. (car + space between). 4. Reference initial site plan Engineering comments (SDP201500016) relative to 100-ft Min. pharmacy drive-thru stacking. LINKS: http://mikeontraffic.typepad.com/files/drive-through-queue-generation.pdf - 100’ vehicle stacking (5 Division: Page:1of3 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 28, 2016 cars) http://www.mikeontraffic.com/cvs-pharmacies-trip-generation-drive-through-queue-parking-study/ (CVS study) –weekday PM peak hour –3 cars http://www.nc-ite.org/images/files/Inciter2012SpringRev.pdf (100’) –5 vehicles; ITE website. (Website references Mikeontraffic.com website.) janderson2 5/19/2015 2:07 PM Date Completed:05/11/2015 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:Based on SP dated 4/3/15 Fire Rescue has no comments or objections on the SP. Listed below are some recommendations as the plans move forward. 1. If the building will have sprinkler system the FDC shall be located on the address side of the structure. 2. Fire Flow test required before final approval. 3. Please add a note to the plans. " Contact Albemarle County Fire Marshals Office to determine the location of the Knox Key Secure Box 434-296-5833" Division: Date Completed:05/19/2015 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:06/05/2015 Reviewer:Rachel Falkenstein Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/29/2015 Reviewer:Amanda Burbage Zoning Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:06/02/2015 Reviewer:Troy Austin VDOT Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/21/2015 Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:1. Capacity issues for sewer that may affect this proposal None Known 2. Requires Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Capacity Certification Yes X No 3. Water flow or pressure issues that may affect this proposal None Known 4. ”Red Flags” regarding service provision (Use attachments if necessary) None Known Division: Date Completed:07/15/2015 Reviewer:John Anderson Engineering Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Drive-thru design (Engineering) special use permit review comment: Site Plan Drive-thru design Division: Page:2of3 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 28, 2016 dated 6/7/15 is nearly identical with image shared as e-mail attachment, 5/21/2015. 6/7/15 design provides sufficient space for 5-car stacking beyond (in addition to) vehicle at drive-thru pharmacy service window. This design provides drive-thru storage for six vehicles, counting vehicle being served, and meets Engineering review guidelines. Engineering Division does not object to this design, commends design efforts, and has ‘No objection’ to special use permit for Drive-thru, 6/7/15. janderson2 7/15/2015 11:32 AM Date Completed:07/16/2015 Reviewer:Amanda Burbage Zoning Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:All comments addressed. Parking reduction request approved 7/15/15. Please be sure to remind applicant that setbacks have changed to a 10' minimum, no maximum and this should be reflected on the site plan. Division: Date Completed:07/24/2015 Reviewer:Rachel Falkenstein Planning Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Page:3of3 County of AlbemarlePrinted On:January 28, 2016