The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201500024 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2016-02-10Ellie Ray From: Ellie Ray Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:29 AM To: Mark Keller Subject: SDP201500024 Albrecht Place - Final Site Plan Mark, I have completed my review of the revised plan set. Since there are so few items left, I've listed my comments below instead of including the entire previous comment letter. The comment numbers reference numbers from my comment letter dated June 26, 2015: 6. [32.5.2(m)] Please clarify the 15' ingress /egress easement in the southeast corner of the site; who is the holder of this easement? Can improvements be constructed in it? Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. The holder of this easement will need to provide a letter indicating their permission for construction of improvements within the easement. Rev2: Comment not addressed; awaiting easement documentation. Rev3: Comment not addressed; awaiting easement documentation. SDP201500024: Comment not addressed; awaiting easement documentation. Any permanent easements must be submitted to the County for review and approval, and recorded prior to site plan approval. SDP201500024 — Rev1: Comment still valid. SDP201500024 — Rev2: Comment addressed. 10. [32.5.2(1) & 32.6.2(g)] Please verify that the location of all existing and proposed utilities and utility easements, including telephone, cable, electric and gas easements are shown on the plan. Any new easements may be generally shown and dedicated by separate plat. Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. All new off -site easements must be shown on the plan and documented prior to approval of final site plan. Rev2: Comment not addressed; awaiting easement documentation. Rev3: Comment not addressed; awaiting easement documentation. SDP201500024: Comment not addressed; awaiting easement documentation. Any permanent easements must be submitted to the County for review and approval, and recorded prior to site plan approval. SDP201500024 — Rev1: Comment still valid. SDP201500024 — Rev2: Comment addressed. 13. [32.6.2(j) & Comment] No grading, planting or disturbance of any type is allowed within the 20' undisturbed buffer; please clarify the note regarding evergreen screen planting, and verify that the diversion dike construction will not disturb the buffer. The 20' undisturbed buffer requires tree protection fencing and a signed conservation plan checklist. Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. Because the E &S plan is not part of this plan set, the tree protection fencing must be shown on the landscape and /or layout sheets. The conservation plan checklist must also be included in the plan set, not as a separate document. Additionally, one response in the comment response letter says no disturbance of the buffer is proposed, yet a different response and most sheets do show disturbance of the 20' undisturbed buffer (the layout sheet does not; this sheet does not match the other sheets in the plan set in many ways). If buffer disturbance is proposed, a special exception request must be submitted (along with the appropriate fee) and will go to the Board of Supervisors for approval once reviewed. Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. Whether buffer disturbance is proposed still isn't resolved; a special exception may still be required. Rev3: Comment not fully addressed. Whether buffer disturbance is proposed still isn't resolved; a special exception may still be required. Additionally, the conservation plan checklist must be completed, signed, and dated (as it was on the previous submittal) prior to site plan approval. SDP201500024: Comment not addressed; it appears that disturbance is proposed in the required undisturbed buffer. As noted previously, this disturbance should either be removed or a request for a waiver (along with the appropriate fee) shall be submitted (see section 21.7). Additionally, the conservation plan checklist must be completed, signed, and dated prior to site plan approval. SDP201500024 — Revi : The special exception request to disturb the required buffer is currently under review. The conservation plan checklist has been completed, signed and dated; please make sure the checklist on the signature copies (when submitted) is as well. SDP201500024 — Rev2: Comment addressed. The special exception for buffer disturbance was approved by the Board on September 2, 2015. Please make sure the conservation plan checklist is completed, signed and dated on the signature copies (when submitted). 25. [Comment] Provide documentation of all off -site easements, including temporary and permanent easements for the work proposed on TMPs 61 U -1 -14, 61 U -1 -13, and 61 M -12 -1 C. Revi : Comment not addressed. All easements must be documented prior to site plan approval. Rev2: Comment not addressed. All easements must be documented prior to site plan approval. Rev3: Comment not addressed. All easements must be documented prior to site plan approval. SDP201500024: Comment not addressed. All easements must be documented prior to site plan approval. Any permanent easements must be submitted to the County for review and approval, and recorded prior to site plan approval. SDP201500024 — Revi : Comment still valid. SDP201500024—Rev2: Easements on TMPs 61 U -1 -14, 61 M -12 -1 C, and 61 M -12 -1 C2 have been documented. However, it appears that an easement on 61U-1-13 is also necessary; has this easement been established? 26. [Comment] This site plan cannot be approved until all site review committee members grant their approval. Engineering and ARB comments have been provided. E911, Inspections and Fire /Rescue had no objection to the first submittal. ACSA and VDOT reviews are being handled directly with the agency, but their signature is required on the site plan. Rev1: Comment not fully addressed. All resubmittals were handled directly with the reviewer; however, fire rescue has entered "no objection" into CountyView. Zoning comments have been provided. It has also come to my attention that the revised site plan was not submitted to ARB; please submit a set of revised plans so that they can verify that the site plan reflects what was approved with the ARB application. All other reviewers must provide their tentative approval prior to submittal of signature sets. Rev2: Comment not fully addressed. All revisions were submitted directly to each reviewer. Zoning has entered a "no objection" into CountyView. It still appears that the revised site plan was not submitted to ARB; submit a set of revised plans for ARB review so that they can verify that the site plan reflects what was approved with the ARB application. All other reviewers must provide their tentative approval prior to submittal of signature sets. Rev3: Comment not fully addressed. All revisions were submitted directly to each reviewer. Zoning, E911, Fire /Rescue and Inspections have entered a "no objection" into CountyView. It still appears that the revised site plan was not submitted to ARB; submit a set of revised plans for ARB review so that they can verify that the site plan reflects what was approved with the ARB application. ARB, ACSA, VDOT and Engineering must provide their tentative approval prior to submittal of signature sets. SDP201500024: This site plan cannot be approved until all site review committee members grant their approval. Engineering and Inspections comments have been provided. E911 and ARB have reviewed the plan and have no objection. I am awaiting ACSA, Fire Rescue and VDOT reviews and will forward their comments upon receipt. SDP201500024 — Rev1: Fire Rescue and VDOT had no objection to the previous submittal. Inspections and ACSA have completed their review of the revision submittal and also have no objection. Engineering comment is the same as on the previous submittal. SDP201500024 — Rev2: Comment addressed. Engineering has completed their review and has no objection. All other reviewers had no objection to previous submittals. 29. [Comment] Many of the notes and labels included on the previous version of the layout sheet are no longer there, make sure all notes and labels are included. SDP201500024 — Revi : Comment still valid; the layout sheet is still missing many notes and labels, things like the building label, 2nd floor limits label, stair label etc. Please provide all appropriate notes and labels. In addition, a separate Sheet 3 was sent electronically after the plan set was submitted; make sure the correct sheet 3 is included in the plan set. SDP201500024 — Rev2: Comment addressed. The labels still do not show on Sheet 3 (layout), but they are on Sheet 4. If you feel they should be on Sheet 3, please add them but I will accept the plans as currently submitted since they are included on Sheet 4. Please let me know if you have any questions, or need any additional information. Thank you, Ellie Carter Ray, PLA, LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE Senior Planner Albemarle County Community Development Planning Division 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3432 fax: 434.972.4126