HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200500136 Review Comments 2005-12-14�� pF ALI3�
� JRG1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
Fax (434) 972 -4126
To: Day id Pennock, Principal Planner
From: Allan Schack, Engineer
Subject: SDP -2005- 00136, Westfield Road Center, Preliminary Site Plan
Date received: 29 November 2005 (plans date 28 November 2005)
Date of Comment: 14 December 2005
The preliminary site plan for Westfield Road Center, received on 29 November 2005, has been reviewed.
Some of the review comments are final site plan review comments that could affect the site layout so are
therefore included with the preliminary site plan review comments. The engineering review for current
development requests changes to this preliminary site plan:
1. Please show existing topography at least fifty feet outside the boundaries of the site plan. [ 8
2. Bumper blocks shall be provided in parking spaces where the parking has curb or curb and gutter and
there is a sidewalk located closer than two (2) feet from the edge of the parking area. Bumper blocks
are not required where the sidewalk has a minimum width of six (6) feet. [ 8
3. It appears that the applicant needs to submit a critical slope waiver for this site. [18- 4.2.5]
4. The site requires a commercial entrance that meets the VDOT standards. Please provide a radius of
curb at the entrance to Westfield Road that meets VDOT criteria. [DM, Section 607B]
5. Please show CG -12s and curb cuts at the proposed entrance at Westfield Road. [Policy]
6. A minimum tangent section of 50' is required, where attainable, to separate entrances from other
entrances' radii. Please revise entrance location. [DM 607B2]
7. Please provide an interparcel connection and associated easement to one of the property's boundary for
future inner parcel connection to TMP 61 -124. [18- 32.7.2.5]
8. Please demonstrate that there is an adequate receiving channel for the storm%t ater outfalI on the
southeast comer of the site. (VESCH, Chapter 8, MS -19a). If an adequate receiving channel does not
exist please provide a letter of intent from the owner of TMP 61 -124 to grant a temporary grading
easement for the construction of a channel. [VESCH, Chapter 8, MS- 19.4.d, DM 1101]
9. If a dumpster is required, please provide a detail for the proposed dumpster. The dumpster pad needs
to be concrete and extend at least 8'+ in front of the dumpster. [18- 4.12.19a, b]
10. The maximum access aisle grade is 10 %. Please revise the grades to be less than 10 [18- 4.12.17a]
11. The parking area shall be designed to minimize the amount of runoff exiting the entrance to the public
street. [ 18- 4.12.15b]
12. Engineering has no problems with the travelway with no parking to be 20' wide instead of 24'.
File: E1 psp_ADS_0 -136 Westfield Road Center
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
701 VDOT Way
Charlottesville, VA 22911
GREGORY A. WHIRLEY
ACTING COMMISSIONER
December 19, 2005
Glenn Brooks
Department of Engineering and Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the December 22, 2005 Site Review
Committee Meeting:
SDP 2005 -00130 Zedekar Raw Land: (Steve Tugwell)
• All entrances will be required to adhere to The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State
Highways.
• A VDOT Entrance permit will be required before any construction takes place on
VDOT's Right of Way.
SDP 2005 -00131 Fife Property RL WP: (Steve Tugwell)
• All entrances will be required to adhere to The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State
Highways.
• A VDOT Entrance permit will be required before any construction takes place on
VDOT's Right of Way.
SDP 2005 -00134 Alltel / Gold Eagle: (Stephen Waller)
• All entrances will be required to adhere to The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State
Highways.
• A VDOT Entrance permit will be required before any construction takes place on
VDOT's Right of Way.
T€CA1�15P4R €A1tq >rkCblt &NCf
1 9 0 6 3 0 0 6
Glenn Brooks
December 19, 2005
Page Two
SDP 2005 -00135 Kia Auto Dealership: (Stephen Waller)
• The intersection at Olympia Drive will need a right taper of 100 ft. as dictated by the
amount of traffic generated by the site.
• A minimum connection radius for the intersection is 50 ft.
• All entrances will be required to adhere to The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State
Highways.
SDP 2005 -00136 Westfield Road Center: (David Pennock)
• All entrances will be required to adhere to The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State
Highways.
• Additional comments will be provided with review of site plans.
SDP 2005 -00137 Touett -Greer Site Reconfiguration: (David Pennock)
• All entrances shall conform to The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways.
• All School roads should follow the standards set fourth in the Subdivision Street
Requirements and the Subdivision Street Design Guide.
• The drop off and bus loops are to have an inside curb radius of 30 ft. minimum.
• All three drop off loops are considered one way street and must follow the Geometric
Design Standards as a minimum on Table 3 page B -9 of the Subdivision Street Design
Guide.
• Public school roads are in the State Secondary System and a VDOT permit will be
required before construction may begin.
Sub 2005 -00365 Dominion Office Park: (Francis MacCall)
• All entrances need to be designed to the standards of The Minimum Standards of
Entrances to State Highways.
• VDOT may have more comments at the presentation of the site plan.
Please request the applicants submit a written description of the revisions when resubmitting for
review. If you should have concerns with these comments, please discuss with this office prior
to sharing with the applicants.
Sincerely,
John W. Winn Jr. L.S.
Cc: Alan Schuck, Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith
Weigand, Margaret Maliszewski, Francis McCall, Steve Tugwell, Stephen Waller, and John
Giometti, Chuck Proctor, Jim Utterback
TO: David Pennock, Planner
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: December 14, 2005
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Westfield Road Center
(TM 61W- 2B -1A)
The below checked items apply to this site. SDP - 2005 -001
X
1.
This site plan is within the Authority's
Jurisdictional area for:
X
A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
X
2.
An 8 inch water line is located approximately 35'
distant.
X
3.
Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located 2
distant from this site plan, is 2503 gpm + at 20 psi
residual.
X
4.
A 10 inch sewer line is located approximately 10'
distant.
5.
An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be
completed.
X
6.
No improvements or obstructions shall be placed
within existing or future easements.
7.
and plans are currently under review.
8.
and plans have been received and
approved.
9.
No plans are required.
10.
Final and plans are required for our
review and approval prior to granting tentative
approval.
11.
Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12.
RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
Comments:
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations waterline size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
Review Comments
Project Name: Westfield Road Center
Date Completed: Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer
Department/Division /Agency: Inspections
Reviews Comments
Based on plans dated November 28, 2005.
No comments or conditions.
Review Status
No Objection
Preliminary — Non - residential
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed 0 Thursday, December 22, 2
Review Comments
Project Name: Westfield Road Center
Date Completed: Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Reviewer: Tamara Ambler
Department/Division /Agency: Water Resources Manager
Reviews Comments
Review Status
No water resources noted.
No Objection
Preliminary — Non - residential
P ?qe: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed 0 Thursday, December 22, 2
Review Comments
Project Name: Westfield Road Center Preliminary — Non - residential
Date Completed: Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski
Department/Division /Agency: ARB
Reviews Comments The ARB reviewed this project on December 5, 2005. Action letters are in process.
Review Status: Requested Changes
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed 0 Thursday, December 22, 2
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Charles Hendricks, The Gaines Group
From: David Pennock, Principal Planner Ow
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date: December 19, 2005
Subject: SDP 05 -136 - Westfield Road Center Preliminary Site Plan
The Albemarle County Division of Zoning and Community Development: Zoning and Planning Review has
revieNved the preliminary site plan referenced above and will approve the plan when the following items have
been satisfactorily addressed. Keep in mind that these comments are preliminary in nature. [Each comment is
preceded b1 the applicable reference.]
Site Plan Comments
1. [32.5.3] Please note that the final site plan will not be approved as shown until the SP has been
approved. As such, please provide a note on the plan once it has been approved.
2. [32.5.6(n) and 4.1.2.19] Please provide locations for trash containers (one is shown, but appears to be
off - site). Dumspter pads will be difficult to fit in later, and may be necessary.
3. [32.5.6(n)] Please provide dimensions for buildings and other structures.
4. [32.5.6(n) and 4.12.13] Please designate a loading space for the office area. Loading spaces must meet
the dimensions of Sec. 4.12. 18 and may be difficult to add in later.
5. [32.5.6(n)] No functional sidewalk is shown on this plan to enable "travel safely and
conveniently ... from the site to adjacent property ". Please revise.
6. [32.5.6(n)] Please indicate the proposed location of any signs on the layout plan. Keep in mind that a
separate sign permit will be required for all signs. However, their preliminary location should be
designated.
7. [32.5.6(x)] Please add EC, entrance corridor to your zoning note on sheet CS.
S. [32.5.6(a)] The title block appears to reference another project. Please amend the address, tax map and
parcel number, add the county, and note that it is in the Rio magisterial district.
9. [32.5.6(a)] Please provide the owner and zoning in addition to the parcel number and present use for
adjacent properties.
10. [32.5.6(a)] Please provide setback information — note that this can be described visually or in written
form.
11. Please add a scale and north arrow to your vicinity map.
12. [32.5.6(d)] Please indicate areas of slope greater than 25 %. Note that disturbance of these areas will
require a waiver.
13. [32.5.6(1)] Please label the State Route number (1452) and provide right -of -way width.
14. [32.5.6(e)] Existing landscape features should be described in accordance with this section — if trees are
to be removed, show tree lines and describe types.
Please contact David Pennock at 296 -5832 ext. 3432 if you have any questions.
nC ALIT
IRGlNX
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
Fax(434)972 -4012
December 21, 2005
Charles Hendricks
The Gaines Group
PO Box 6255
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ARB- 2005 -139 Westfield Road Center — Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan (Tax Map
61 W, Section 2, Block B, Parcel IA)
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on December 5, 2005, completed a
preliminary review of the above -noted request. The Board took the following actions.
RejZardin2 the Preliminary Site Plan the Board made the following comments and suggestions for the
benefit of the applicant's next submittal.
1. Provide colored samples of the metal frames to be used for the doors and windows on the ground
and first floor levels, the arched overhang above the door on the north elevation, and the doors on
the second floor. Indicate color and materials to be used for the railings and stair parts on the
second floor. Revise material layout drawing (submitted) to reflect all proposed materials.
2. Use the same window and door colors between floors as a unifying transitional element. Provide
continuity between windows on upper floors.
3. Provide a west elevation drawing without the landscaping.
4. Note the location of the shared dumpster on the site plan along with a note referencing the shared
use agreement. Provide a signed copy of the shared dumpster agreement with Albemarle First
Bank. Provide an alternate means of screening for the HVAC units — evergreen shrubs of adequate
height or some other opaque enclosure compatible with the building. Note on the plan that the
planting height of the screen will be a minimum one foot taller than the tallest HVAC unit.
5. Provide a sidewalk connection from the back of the building to the front of the building to the
existing sidewalk across the front of the property, if the driveway can be reduced to 20' instead of
24' without losing planting space.
6. Clearly identify the proposed storm water system on the site plan.
7. Provide an "Existing Conditions" sheet identifying the location, type, and size of individual trees
or groups of trees and their drip lines. The cedar trees are healthy, mature specimens and should
be saved if at all possible. Save the ones that will not be impacted by the proposed layout.
ARB 200 -139 Westfield Rd. Center
Page 2
December 21, 200
8. ShoNv retaining wall heights and proposed retaining wall materials on the site plan.
9. Provide 3-1/2 inch caliper trees along the western boundary of the site. Large caliper trees would
be appropriate on the EC side of the building, particularly if the Eastern Red Cedars will be
removed.
10. Provide a combination of trees and shrubs along the southern side of the site, together with
documentation that the utility authority will permit the planting. If the utility authority will only
permit shrubs then propose tall evergreen shrubs.
11. Revise the plant schedule to indicate that all required shrubs will be a minimum of 24 inches tall
at planting. Revise the plant schedule so that deciduous trees are listed by caliper, and shrubs and
evergreens are listed by height. Revise the proposed plant materials along all sides of the rear
parking lot to reflect a mix of plants that are more evergreen than deciduous and closer to five feet
in height at maturity. Revise plant choices to coordinate with the height of overhead power lines.
12. Revise the proposed planting along the western elevation to reflect more of a balance of deciduous
and evergreen shrubs with the necessary height to screen the I-IVAC units and soften the height of
the tall blank walls. Correct the drawing so that the annotation pertaining to the number of Blue
Prince Hollies along the foundation of the eastern elevation corresponds with the number of shrub
symbols shown.
13. Provide complete site lighting and decorative lighting information with the next submittal.
14. Provide complete sign information for review.
15. Provide site sections from Route 29 through the site. (Note that some Board members believed
that the difference in appearance of the upper and lower parts of the building was not appropriate
for the EC. The degree of visibility of the building, as determined in part by site sections, will
determine the degree to which design changes are required.)
16. If an elevator will be added and the stairwell will be enclosed, provide revised designs for review.
17. Revise the site plan to include Route 29 North and Westfield Road for context.
Re�!ardin2 the Special Use Permit No recommendation was made by the ARB. Action will be taken at
a future meeting after the applicant resubmits the plan.
You may submit your application for final ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms,
checklists and schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.or<_r /planning
Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Please include a memo outlining
exactly how each comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made,
identify those changes in the memo also.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me
Sincerely,
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
Planning Division
B WN /aer
AR-B 2005 -139 Westfield Rd. Center
Page 2
December 21, 2005
cc: Charles Lewis
Lewis LLC of Troy
112 West Main Street, Suite 11
Charlottesville, VA 2290
David Pennock
File
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Rebecca Ragsdale, Planner
Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
December 21, 2005
Site Plan Technical Review for: Westfield Road Center
(TM 61W- 2B -lA)
The below checked items apply to this site. SP- 2005 -00033
X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's
jurisdictional area for:
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
X 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately 35'
distant.
X 3. Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located 20'
distant from this site plan, is 2503 gpm + at 20 psi
residual.
X 4. A 10 inch sewer line is located approximately 10'
distant.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be
completed.
X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed
within existing or future easements.
7. and plans are currently under review.
8. and plans have been received and
approved.
9. No plans are required.
10. Final and plans are required for our
review and approval prior to granting tentative
approval.
11. Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
Comments: Backflow prevention required. Provide plumbing
information to size meter. Relocate water meter to road
margin. Meter commercial and residential separately.
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations waterline size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
OF A1,
r�
� rRGI:`I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
December 22, 2005
Fax (434) 972 -4126
Charles Hendricks
The Gaines Group
P.O. Box 6255
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: SDP -05 -136 — Westfield Road Center
Dear Sir or Madam:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary
Comments for the following agencies, as applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Department of Community Development — Current Planning
Albemarle County Department of Community Development - Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
Albemarle County Service Authority
Albemarle County - Building Code Enforcement and Zoning Services
Albemarle County Water Resources Manager
Architectural Review Board
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not
be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues which could
affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review
Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not
incorporating such revisions. Submit seven full size copies and one 11" x 17" copy to the Department of
Planning and Community Development. Responses to the attached comments of the Site Review Committee
must be submitted by January 3, 2006. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in
suspension of the review schedule.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
or14
David Pennock, AICP
Principal Planner
Attachments
Cc:
OF
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
To: David Pennock, Principal Planner
From: Allan Schuck, Engineer
Subject: SDP- 2005- 00136, Westfield Road Center, Preliminary Site Plan
Date received: 18 January 2006 (plans rev. date 12 January 2006)
Date of Comment: 17 February 2006
The preliminary site plan for Westfield Road Center, received on 18 January 2006, has been reviewed.
The engineering review for current development recommends denial to this preliminary site plan:
A minimum tangent section of 50' is required, where attainable, to separate entrances from other
entrances' radii. Please revise entrance location. [DM 607132]
Rev. 1: The applicant did not adequately adtb -css this review cotnntent. Applicant states in 12 January
2006 metro: "Worked with Chuck Proctor at VDOT to design an acceptable entrance to the site to satisfy
VDOT's requirements. " To adequately address this comment, please provide written documentation to the
County that VDOT has approved this entrance location. If VDOT approves this location, engineering will
accept this entrance location.
2. Please provide an interparcel connection and associated easement to one of the property's boundary for
future inner parcel connection to TMP 61 W- 2 -13-1A. [18- 32.7.2.5]
Rev. 1: The applicant slid not adequately address this review cottttne nt. The applicant has not provided
U17 interconnection,f TMP 61 W- 2 -B -1A as previously requested.
3. All previous review comments have been adequately addressed with this submittal.
File: E2 psp ADS 05-136 Westfield Road Center
�1 AL
IRGIN�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone(434)296 -5832
Fax(434)972 -4012
February l 7, 2006
Charles Hendricks
The Gaines Group
PO Box 6255
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ARB -2005 -174: Westfield Road Center - Preliminary Review of a Site Development Plan
(Tax Map 61 W, Section 2, Block B, Parcel I A)
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday,
February 6, 2006. The Board unanimously approved the request, pending staff administrative approval of the
following conditions:
The facade treatments for the top 2 stories shall be stucco, with the texture to be reviewed by staff,
1 The current elevation as shown on 2 -6 -06 is acceptable for the blank wall on the northwest elevation.
3. The wood fence is acceptable and shall be a dark brick color and shall be of a height sufficient to
screen the air conditioning units. Show the shared dumpster on the site plan and provide a signed copy
of the shared dumpster agreement.
4. Identify the retaining wall material on the site plan. Split -face block in tan is acceptable.
5. Revise the landscape schedule to indicate that the 2 "October Glory" Red Maples along the western
boundary will be 3 -1/2 inch in caliper at planting. Label the shrubs on the northwest corner.
6. Provide documentation from the utility authority that the proposed shrubbery shown along the rear
(southern) boundary will be permitted.
7. The pole lights shall be 15' in height from the proposed grade and the wall packs shall be limited to
10'. hndicate the light pole heights on the plan. Revise the luminaire schedule to indicate that all
proposed fixtures will be a full cutoff type. Note on the plan that the wall pack housing will be a dark
bronze color. Clarify whether or not wall pack "PI LS" is being used in this proposal.
8. Add annotation to sheet L1 indicating exactly which Eastern Red Cedar trees are to be saved.
9. Indicate the material and type of railing for the exterior stairs. include a railing detail. The stairs shall
be screened by plant material or shall be dark in color.
nRB 2005 -171 Westfield Road Center
Pagc 3 of 2
Fehruan 17.3006
Please provide
t. Two copies of revised drawings addressing these conditions.
2. A memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been
made, identify those changes in the memo also.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This l'01 must be returned with your revisions to
ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
Planning Division
B WN /aer
Cc: Charlie Lewis - Lewis LLC of Troy
112 West Main Street, Suite II, Charlottesville, VA 22902
David Pennock
File
`J Fg
` �lltf;l"
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: David Pennock, Current Development planning and zoning review
From: Glenn Brooks, Current Development engineering review
Date: 23 Feb 2006
Subject: Westfield Road Center (SP200500033, SDP200500136) critical slope waiver request
The critical slope waiver request has been reviewed. The engineering analysis of the request follows:
Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance:
This is a narrow slope running across the property in the rear. A proposed building, parking area,
travelway and retaining walls will replace the critical slope area, as shown below;
- I
I'I
I
t
Areas
Acres
Total site
0.55
Critical slopes
0.04
7% of site
Critical slopes disturbed
0.04
1 100% of critical slopes
Exemptions to critical slopes waivers for driveways, roads and utilities without reasonable
alternative locations:
There are no exemptions on this site.
Compliance with Zoning Ordinance 18 -4.2:
"movement of soil and rock"
The slopes will be leveled. Movement of soil and rock is not an issue.
"excessive stornnvater runoff"
Albemarle County Community Development
Engineering Review comments
Page 2 of 2
Runoff will be increased by the plan proposed. The Water Protection Ordinance, section 17-
314F4, exempts sites under l acre from control of peak rate and velocity of runoff.
"siltation"
Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control during construction. Proper
stabilization and maintenance will ensure long term stability.
"loss of aesthetic resource"
This area is visible fi Greenbrier Drive and Westfield Road, and the surround commercial
properties. I could not verify that these are man -made slopes as the applicant indicates.
1285
1309
A'
,>
x1265''/
1245
530;►
. : 535
JF 1 l fit' 4
450
. i
866
500
"septic effluent"
This is not a concern as the site is serviced by public sewer.
Based on the review above, there are no engineering concenis which prohibit the disturbance of the
critical slopes as shown. Under the related issue of stormwater runoff, the Planning Commission may
wish to impose the following condition;
1. Peak rate and velocity of runoff be controlled to pre - development levels.
Page 1 of')
Allan Schuck
From:
Allan Schuck
Sent:
Thursday, February 23, 2006 10:00 AM
To:
David E. Pennock; 'David Collins'; charles hendricks
Cc:
Rebecca Ragsdale; Glenn Brooks
Subject:
Westfield Road
Attachments: 02 -23 -06 Westfield Road Interparcel connection
Gnx)d iL' cry ling.
Er±,ineering ccUpts this E -mail correspondence that VDOT has accepted the proposed entrance location onto
Al stfield Toad.
I..his adequately addresses e; i, review comment #1 from my memo dated 17 February 2006.
Engineering has reviewed the PDF file showing the proposed interparcel connection. Engineering has no
problem with the concept. Please move the €nterparcel curbing to the south so the two internal access ;points
align. It appears that the grades will allow this change to occur. I have attached a scan of the PDF file: showing
my requested changes. Please open this attachment in Adobe Reader.
lease suuint a hard copy of this change to Engineering and Planning. Please address these to David Pennock.
Engineering will review this hard copy. If the location is okay, engineering can recommend approval to the
pru!imirrary site plan.
1 vv,ll expedite the review of this item since it is a minor revision.
Allan Schuck
From: David E. Pennock
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:26 PM
To: Allan Schuck
Cc: Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject: FW: Westfield Road
Regarding the entrance of the Westfield Road Center site, this is Charles' conversation with VDOT Alian says
he'll verify if this IS sufficient to address his comment.
From: charles hendricks [ mailto: cbhendricks @thegainesgroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:14 PM
To: David E. Pennock
Subject: Fw: Westfield Road
David.
Here is our email trail with VDOT. I will get a letter.
Charles
2/23/2006
Page 2 of 3
- - - -- Original Message - - - --
From: David Collins
To: Proctor, Charles C.
Cc: Charles hendricks ; Winn, Jr., John W. L.S.
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Westfield Road
Chuck,
Happy New Year to you and your family.
Thank you for reviewing the proposed entrance. We will proceed with the site plan.
David
- - - -- Original Message - - - --
From: Proctor, Charles C.
To: 'David Collins'
Cc: Charles hendricks ; Winn, Jr., John W. L.S.
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Westfield Road
David,
This will be acceptable for the entrance to the site.
If there are any questions, please contact John Winn at the residency office at 434- 293 -0011.
Thanks,
Charles C. Proctor III
District Transportation Planner (PD -10)
Culpeper District
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
540 - 829 -7558
Charles. proctor'VDOT. virginia. gov
From: David Collins [mailto:dic @brucheum.com]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 10:45 AM
To: Proctor, Charles C.
Cc: Charles hendricks
Subject: Fw: Westfield Road
Chuck,
This is what we have come up with for the Westfield Road site. It uses a 30 tangent radius on the north side of
the entrance and a 12 foot radius on the south side. We have 30 feet at the property line that narrows down to
24 feet at the end of the 30' curve. On the south side of the entrance, we are trying to miss an electric pole,
therefore the 12' radius; this still gives a 14' radius to the e.p..
Please look at this and we can talk about it next week. We are on a timeline for resubmittal, so we would like to
get it settled soon.
Take care and have a happy New Year.
David Collins
David L. Collins, P.E., L.S.
John McNair & Assoc.
109 South Wayne Avenue
2/23/2006
Page 3 of 3
Waynesboro, Virginia 22980
(540) -942 -1161
(540)- 942 -1163 FAX
2/23/2006
N
J /
/
Q
H w r
M
I Z
H
i
11.
C o,
i
° sd
�
Ln
z
w
z
Q
��r
Page 1 of 2
Allan Schuck
From:
David E. Pennock
Sent:
Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:26 PM
To:
Allan Schuck
Cc:
Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject: FW: Westfield Road
Regarding the entrance of the Westfield Road Center site, this is Charles' conversation with VDOT. Allan says
he'll verify if this is sufficient to address his comment.
From: charles hendricks [ mailto: cbhendricks @thegainesgroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:14 PM
To: David E. Pennock
Subject: Fw: Westfield Road
David,
Here is our email trail with VDOT. I will get a letter.
Charles
- - - -- Original Message - - - --
From: David Collins
To: Proctor, Charles C.
Cc: charles hendricks ; Winn, Jr., John W. L.S.
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Westfield Road
Chuck,
Happy New Year to you and your family.
Thank you for reviewing the proposed entrance. We will proceed with the site plan.
David
- - - -- Original Message - - - --
From: Proctor, Charles C.
To: 'David Collins'
Cc: charles hendricks ; Winn, Jr., John W. L.S.
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Westfield Road
David,
This will be acceptable for the entrance to the site.
If there are any questions, please contact John Winn at the residency office at 434 - 293 -0011.
Thanks,
i
�-
Charles C. Proctor III
District Transportation Planner (PD -10)
Culpeper District
1601 Orange Road
2/23/2006
Page 2 of 2
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
540- 829 -7558
charles .proctor @VDOT.virginia.gov
From: David Collins [mailto:dlc @brucheum.com]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 10:45 AM
To: Proctor, Charles C.
Cc: charles hendricks
Subject: Fw: Westfield Road
Chuck,
This is what we have come up with for the Westfield Road site. It uses a 30 tangent radius on the north side of
the entrance and a 12 foot radius on the south side. We have 30 feet at the property line that narrows down to
24 feet at the end of the 30' curve. On the south side of the entrance, we are trying to miss an electric pole,
therefore the 12' radius; this still gives a 14' radius to the e.p..
Please look at this and we can talk about it next week. We are on a timeline for resubmittal, so we would like to
get it settled soon.
Take care and have a happy New Year.
David Collins
David L. Collins, P.E., L.S.
John McNair & Assoc.
109 South Wayne Avenue
Waynesboro, Virginia 22980
(540)- 942 -1161
(540)- 942 -1163 FAX
2/23/2006
� jRGII�Z
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
Fax (434) 972 -4126
To: David Pennock, Principal Planner
From: Allan Schuck, Engineer
Subject: SDP -2005- 00136, Westfield Road Center, Preliminary Site Plan
Date received: 27 February 2006 (plans rev, date 12 January 2006, rev. Sheet C.1 23 Feb 06)
Date of Comment: 01 March 2006
The preliminary site plan for Westfield Road Center, received on 27 February 2006, has been reviewed.
The engineering review for current development recommends approval to this preliminary site plan:
A minimum tangent section of 50' is required, where attainable, to separate entrances from other
entrances' radii. Please revise entrance location. [DM 607132]
Rev. 1: The applicant did not adequately address this reviely comment. Applicant states in 12 January
2006 memo: "Worked with Chuck Proctor at VDOT to design an acceptable entrance to the site to satisfy
VDOT's requirements. " To adequately address this comment, please provide written documentation to the
County that VDOT has approved this entrance location. If VDOT approves this location, engineering will
accept this entrance location.
Rev. 2: The applicant has provided an E -mail from Chuck Proctor, VDOT, and dated 03 January 2006,
which states VDOT, accepts the site's entrance location onto Westfield Road. This E -mail adequately
addresses review comment #1.
Please provide an intetparcel connection and associated easement to one of the property's boundary for
future inner parcel connection to TMP 61 W -2 -13-I A. [18- 32.7.2.5]
Rev. 1: The applicant did not adequately address this review comment. The applicant has not provided
an interconnection front TMP 61 W- 2 -B -1A as previously requested.
Rev. 2: The applicant has shown an interparcel connection along the eastern property line on Sheet C 1.
datec123 February 2006. Tltis provides interpurcel connect front TMP 061 W- 2 -B -IA to TMP 061 W -? -B-
S, 061 W- 2 -B -5A, and 061 W- 2 -B -5B. This revision adequately addresses review connnent #2.
3. All previous review comments have been adequately addressed with this submittal.
File: E3_psp_ADS_05 -136 Westfield Road Center Bloc
Page 1 of 1
David E. Pennock
From: Rebecca Ragsdale
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:17 PM
To: David E. Pennock
Subject: FW: Westfield Road Center
Attachments: westfield road center.doc
From: Gary Whelan [mailto:gwhelan @acsanet.com]
Sent: Tue 5/16/2006 4:26 PM
To: Rebecca Ragsdale
Subject: Westfield Road Center
Rebecca,
We have a few comments that have carried over from when we first saw this as an SP. I will attach the previous
comments. The current comments are:
1) Relocated the water meter to the road margin.
2) If applicable, residential and commercial uses require separate meters.
3) Provide a plumbing fixture count to size the meter.
4) Backflow prevention is required.
They are showing shrubs in our sewer easement. The architect originally wanted wax myrtles there and I told him
no. We compromised on the inkberries, with the condition that if they became a problem for us, we would remove
them.
--Gary
5/17/2006
ti� OF Ar.��, n,
r IRCI��P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
To: David Pemlock, Principal Planner
From: Allan Schuck, Engineer
Subject: SDP -2005- 00136, Westfield Road Center, Preliminary Site Plan
Date received: 27 February 2006 (plans rev. date 12 January 2006, rev. Sheet C.1 23 Feb 06)
Date of Comment: 01 March 2006
The preliminary site plan for Westfield Road Center, received on 27 February 2006, has been reviewed.
The engineering review for current development recommends approval to this preliminary site plan:
1. A minimum tangent section of 50' is required, where attainable, to separate entrances from other
entrances' radii. Please revise entrance location. [DM 607132]
Rev. 1: The applicant did not adequately adth this review comment. Applicant states in 12 January
2006 memo: "Worked with Chuck Proctor at VDOT to design all acceptable entrance to the site to satish
VDOT's requirements. " To adequately address this comment, please provide written documentation to the
County that VDOT has approved this entrance location. If VDOT approves this location, engineering will
accept this entrance location.
Rev. 2: The applicant has provided all E - mail f •ont Chuck Proctor, VDOT, crud dated 03 January 2006,
which states VDOT, accepts the site's entrance location onto 6Vestficld Road. This E -mail adequately
addresses review continent #1.
Please provide an interparcel connection and associated easement to one of the property's boundary for
future inner parcel connection to TMP 61 W -2 -13-1 A. [18- 32.7.2.5]
Rev. 1: The applicant did not adequately address this review continent. The applicant has not provided
arr irrter f TMP 61 W 2 -B -lA as previously requested.
Rev. 2: The applicant has .shown an interparcel connection along the eastern property line on Sheet C.1,
dated 23 February 2006. This provides interparcel connect ,fi °om TMP 061 W- 2 -B -1A to TMP 061 W -2 -B-
5, 061 W- 2 -B -5A, anti 061 W- 2 -B -5B. This revision adequately addresses review corrrrnent #2.
3. All previous review comments have been adequately addressed with this submittal.
File: E3_psp_ADS_05 -136 Westfield Road Center.doc
� fFt(:11�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: SDP -2005- 00136, Westfield Road Center, Final Site Plan
Plan preparer: Mr. Charles B. Hendricks, The Gaines Group (fax 434.979.9126)
Owner or rep.: Mr. Charlie Lewis, Lewis LLC of Troy (fax 434984.3705)
Date received: 09 June 2006 (plan date 12 May 2006)
Date of Comment: 08 August 2006
Engineer: Allan Schuck
The final site plan for Westfield Road Center, received on 09 June 2006, has been reviewed. The
engineering review for current development will reconuncnd approval of the final site plan when the
following items are adequately addressed: Engineering personnel is available from 2 -4 PM on Thursdays
to discuss these review comments. Please contact Mr. Glenn Brooks, PE, to schedule a time.
A. Final site plan comments:
1. Please label the dimensions of all proposed parking spaces. [18- 32.6.6e]
2. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the final site plans. [18- 32.6.1 ]
3. Please label all of the curb radii on the final site plan. [I 8-32.6.6e]
4. The applicant needs to provide casements for proposed offsite grading. [DM 1102]
5. Please provide spot elevations at both parking lots to show that the drainage will be adequately
addressed with this plan. [18- 32.6.6d]
6. Engineering has reviewed the computations, dated 25 October 2005, for this site plan. The site
plan has changed from these computations. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on
the computations and resubmit the computations to match the plan. [DM, section 901C]
7. The SWM and E &SC plans need to be approved before Engineering can recommend approval to
the final site plan. [18- 32.7.4.3]
8. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming, on the review of future submittals,
due to the changes required for this plan submittal.
B. Stormwater management plan comments:
Reviewed under WPO- 2006 -00
9. The applicant needs to submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application and fee to the County
before the SWM plan can be reviewed by County staff. Please submit two (2) copies of the SWM plan
and required computations to be reviewed. [17 -303]
10. Engineering has received a letter from Americast approving this layout design for the Filterras.
11. Please show that the Filterras can capture the 10- year stone without overflow to meet the
ordinance requirements.
12. A complete SWM plan review will be performed on the official submittal of the SWM plans.
13. The SWM plans need to be approved before engineering recommends approval to the final site
plan.
Eng_ ,ring Review comments
Sheet 2 of 2
C. Erosion and sediment control plan comments:
Reviewed under WPO- 2006 -00
Narrative:
14. The E &SC Narrative has not been reviewed.
Plans:
15. The applicant needs to submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application and fee to the County
before the E &SC plan and narrative can be reviewed by County staff. Please submit two (2)
copies of the E &SC plan to be reviewed. [17 -203]
16. A complete E &SC plan review will be performed on the official submittal of the E &SC plans.
Items B and C need to be completed before a grading permit can be issued for this project.
File: E1_tsp_ ADS_05 -136 Westfield Road Ccnter.doc
�0 :1Lt
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: SDP -2005- 00136, Westfield Road Center, Final Site Plan, SWM & E &SC
Plan preparer: Mr. Charles B. Hendricks, The Gaines Group (fax 434.979.9126)
Mr. David Collins, PE, John McNair and Associates (fax 540.942.1163)
Owner or rep.: Mr. Charlie Lewis, Lewis LLC of Troy (fax 434.984.3705)
Date received: Rev. 1: 24 August 2006 (plan t•ev. (late 18 August 2006)
09 June 2006 (plan date 12 May 2006)
Date of Comment: Rev. 1: 22 Septemher 2006
08 August 2006
Engineer: Allan Schuck
The final site plan, SWM, and E &SC plans for Westfield Road Center, received on 18 August 2006, has
been reviewed. The engineering review for current development will recommend approval of the final site
plan when the following items are adequately addressed:
A. Final site plan comments:
1. Please label the dimensions of all proposed parking spaces. [18- 32.6.6e]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan suhrnittal.
2. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the final site plans. [18- 32.6.1]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan suhrnittal.
3. Please label all of the curb radii on the final site plan. [ 18- 32.6.6e]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
4. The applicant needs to provide easements for proposed offsite grading. [DM 1 102]
Rev. 1: This comment has NOT been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
5. Please provide spot elevations at both parking lots to show that the drainage will be adequately
addressed with this plan. [18- 32.6.6d]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed With this plan suhrnittal.
6. Engineering has reviewed the computations, dated 25 October 2005, for this site plan. The site
plan has changed from these computations. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on
the computations and resubmit the computations to match the plan. [DM, section 901 C]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan suhrnittal.
7. The SWM and E &SC plans need to be approved before Engineering can recommend approval to
the final site plan. [18- 32.7.4.3]
Rev. 1: The SYVM and E &SC plans have been submitted_lbr review.
8. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming, on the review of future submittals,
due to the changes required for this plan submittal.
Rev. 1: No eonnnents are fbrthcofraing.
B. Stormwater management plan comments:
Reviewed under WPO- 2006 -00068
9. The applicant needs to submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application and fee to the County
Albemarle County nmunity Development
Engineering Review comments
Sheet 2 of 3
before the SWM plan can be reviewed by County staff. Please submit two (2) copies of the SWM plan
and required computations to be reviewed. [17 -303]
Rev. 1: This conrnient has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
10. Engineering has received a letter from Americast approving this layout design for the Filterras.
Rev. 1: This coninicnt has been adequately addressed gvith this plan .submittal.
11. Please show that the Filterras can capture the 10- year stonn without overflow to meet the
ordinance requirements.
Rev. 1: This connnent has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
12. A complete SWM plan review will be performed on the official submittal of the SWM plans.
Rev. 1: Please see the comments provided below.
13. Engineering recommends approval to the SWM plans.
14. Please submit two (2) additional copies of the SWM plans to this office.
15. The SWM portion of the Water Protection Ordinance bond amount is $32,000.00. Please contact
Ms. Pam Shifflett for bonding process inforination after an E &SC bond amount has been computed.
16. The SWM plans need to be approved before engineering recommends approval to the final site
plan.
C. Erosion and sediment control plan comments:
Reviewed under WPO- 2006 -00068
Narrative:
17. The E &SC Narrative has not been reviewed.
Rev. 1: The narrative appears adequate with this plan submittal.
Plans:
18. The applicant needs to submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application and fee to the County
before the E &SC plan and narrative can be reviewed by County staff. Please submit two (2)
copies of the E &SC plan to be reviewed. [17 -203]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan suhnrittal.
19. A complete E &SC plan review will be performed on the official submittal of the E &SC plans.
Rev. 1: Please see the review comments below that need to he addressed.
20. Rev. 1: The construction entrance needs to be a paved construction entrance. The detail for this
feature needs to be shown as the detail from the Design Manual. A sediment trapping measure is
needed for the CE. A diversion dike from this entrance to the proposed sediment trap may be
adequate for this site. [DM Chapter 5, Appendix WR -1]
21. Rev. 1: Please provide the following note with the CE: "A nrinimurn water tap of 1 inch must he
installed with a rmnimum I inch ballcock .vhrrtoff valve .srrpplvmg a }g'as'h hose with a diameter of
1.5 irtches adequate constant pr °esstrr•e. Wash gi rrnist he carr•iecl agvay fi onr the crrtrartce to
an approved settling area to remove sediment. All seclirnent .shall he prevented fi °orrr entering
storm drains, ditches or water courses. " [ DM, Ch 5]
22. Rev. 1: An offsite grading easement is required for this E &SC plan. Please provide easement. [
23. Rev. 1: Please show the general erosion and sediment control construction notes on the E &SC
plans. These notes are attached to these conmrents. [VESCH Table VI -15]
24. Rev. 1: Please show an area on the plan for a soil stockpile. Provide silt fence around this area.
25. Rev. 1: Please show the tree protection measures outside of the drip line of the trees. It is
imperative to show the drip line of the trees to be saved on the E &SC plans. Any disturbance
inside of the drip line of the trees will destroy the tree. [VESCH 3.01 ]
26. Rev. 1: The following comments relate to the sediment trap: [VESCH 3.14]
• Please label the bottom dimensions of the proposed sediment trap.
• Please provide the following elevations on the E &SC plans: bottom elevations and
Albemarle County nmunity Development
Engin ring Review comments
Sheet 3 of 3
top of wet storage elevation.
• Please show the required grading for the trap as well as the weir location on the
plans. The grading lines are not clear enough on this plan sheet C5.
• Please provide computations that demonstrate the required volume is attained.
27. Please delineate the lines for SF and
28. Rev. 1: Just a reminder, DCR is enforcing the VSMP General Permit Registration Statement.
Please contact Mr. Andrew Lowe, DCR, at 804.225.2994 for more information. This does not
affect your review /approval of this plan.
29. Rev. 1: The E &SC bond amount has not been determined at this time.
Items B and C need to be completed before a grading permit can be issued for this project.
File: E2 fsp_ ADS_05 -136 Westfield Road Center. doe
�IRGIT
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
Project:
Plan preparer:
Owner or rep.:
Date received:
Date of Comment:
Engineer:
Fax (434) 972 -4126
WPO- 2006 - 00068, Westfield Road Center, Final Site Plan, SWM & E &SC
Mr. Charles B. Hendricks, The Gaines Group (fax 434.979.9126)
Mr. David Collins, PE, John McNair and Associates (fax 540.942.1 163)
Mr. Charlie Lewis, Lewis LLC of Troy (fax 434.984.3705)
Rev. 2: 24 October 2006 (plan rev. date 23 October 2006)
Rev. 1: 24 August 2006 (plan rev. date 18 August 2006)
09 June 2006 (plan date 12 May 2006)
Rev. 2: 13 November 2006
Rev. 1: 22 September 2006
08 August 2006
Allan Schuck
The final site plan, SWM, and E &SC plans for Westfield Road Center, received on 24 October 2006, has
been reviewed. The engineering review for current development will recommend approval of the final site
plan when the following items are adequately addressed:
A. Final site plan comments:
Reviewed under SDP - 2005 -00136
1. Please label the dimensions of all proposed parking spaces. [18- 32.6.6e]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
2. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on the final site plans. [18- 32.6.1]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
3. Please label all of the curb radii on the final site plan. [18- 32.6.6e]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
4. The applicant needs to provide easements for proposed offsite grading. [DM 1 102]
Rev. 1: This comment has NOT been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
Rev. 2: This comment has NOT been adequately addressed. The County Attorney's office needs
to approve the deed of easement.
5. Please provide spot elevations at both parking lots to show that the drainage will be adequately
addressed with this plan. [18- 32.6.6d]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
6. Engineering has reviewed the computations, dated 25 October 2005, for this site plan. The site
plan has changed from these computations. Please provide a signed and dated professional seal on
the computations and resubmit the computations to match the plan. [DM, section 901 C]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
7. The SWM and E &SC plans need to be approved before Engineering can recommend approval to
the final site plan. [18- 32.7.4.3]
Rev. 1: The SWM and E &SC plans have been submitted for review.
8. Additional comments and /or conditions may be forthcoming, on the review of future submittals,
due to the changes required for this plan submittal.
Albemarle County Community Development
Engineering Review comments
Sheet 2 of 3
Rev. 1: No further comments are,forthcoming.
B. Stormwater management plan comments:
Reviewed under WPO- 2006 -00068
9. The applicant needs to submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application and fee to the County
before the SWM plan can be reviewed by County staff. Please submit two (2) copies of the SWM plan
and required computations to be reviewed. [17 -303]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
10. Engineering has received a letter from Americast approving this layout design for the Filterras.
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
11. Please show that the Filterras can capture the 10- year storm without overflow to meet the
ordinance requirements.
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
12. A complete SWM plan review will be performed on the official submittal of the SWM plans.
Rev. 1: Please see the comments provided below.
13. Engineering recommends approval to the SWM plans.
14. Please submit two (2) additional copies of the SWM plans to this office.
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed.
15. The SWM portion of the Water Protection Ordinance bond amount is $32,000.00. Please contact
Ms. Pam Shifflett for bonding process information after an E &SC bond amount has been computed.
Rev. 2: This comment has NOT been adequately addressed.
C. Erosion and sediment control plan comments:
Reviewed under WPO- 2006 -00068
Narrative:
16. The E &SC Narrative has not been reviewed.
Rev. 1: The narrative appears adequate with this plan submittal.
Plans:
17. The applicant needs to submit a Water Protection Ordinance Application and fee to the County
before the E &SC plan and narrative can be reviewed by County staff. Please submit two (2)
copies of the E &SC plan to be reviewed. [17 -203]
Rev. 1: This comment has been adequatelv addressed with this plan submittal.
18. A complete E &SC plan review will be performed on the official submittal of the E &SC plans.
Rev. 1: Please see the review comments below that need to be addressed.
19. Rev. 1: The construction entrance needs to be a paved construction entrance. The detail for this
feature needs to be shown as the detail from the Design Manual. A sediment trapping measure is
needed for the CE. A diversion dike from this entrance to the proposed sediment trap may be
adequate for this site. [DM Chapter 5, Appendix WR -1 ]
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
20. Rev. 1: Please provide the following note with the CE: "A minimum water tap of'] inch must be
installed with a minimum I inch ballcock shutoff valve supplving a wash hose with a diameter of
1.5 inches for adequate constant pressure. Wash water must be carried away from the entrance to
an approved settling area to remove sediment. All sediment shall be prevented frorrr entering
storm drains, ditches or water courses. " [ DM, Ch 5]
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
21. Rev. 1: An offsite grading easement is required for this E &SC plan. Please provide easement.
Albemarle County Community Development
Engineering Review comments
Sheet 3 of 3
Rev. 2: The County's attorney office needs to approve the deed of easement for the drainage
easement otherwise it is okay.
22. Rev. 1: Please show the general erosion and sediment control construction notes on the E &SC
plans. These notes are attached to these comments. [VESCH Table V1 -15]
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
23. Rev. 1: Please show an area on the plan for a soil stockpile. Provide silt fence around this area.
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
24. Rev. 1: Please show the tree protection measures outside of the drip line of the trees. It is
imperative to show the drip line of the trees to be saved on the E &SC plans. Any disturbance
inside of the drip line of the trees will destroy the tree. [VESCH 3.01]
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
25. Rev. 1: The following comments relate to the sediment trap: [VESCH 3.14]
• Please label the bottom dimensions of the proposed sediment trap.
• Please provide the following elevations on the E &SC plans: bottom elevations and
top of wet storage elevation.
• Please show the required grading for the trap as well as the weir location on the
plans. The grading lines are not clear enough on this plan sheet C5.
• Please provide computations that demonstrate the required volume is attained.
Rev. 2: This comment has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
26. Rev. 1: Please delineate the lines for SF and grading lines.
Rev. 2: This continent has been adequately addressed with this plan submittal.
27. Rev. 1: Just a reminder, DCR is enforcing the VSMP General Permit Registration Statement.
Please contact Mr. Andrew Lowe, DCR, at 804.225.2994 for more information. This does not
affect your review /approval of this plan.
Rev. 2: This commentfor informational purposes only.
28. Rev. 1: The E &SC bond amount has not been determined at this time.
Rev. 2: The E &SC portion of the Water Protection Ordinance bond amount is $13,000.00.
Please contact Ms. Pam Shifflett at 296.5861, Ext. 3246 for bond posting information.
29. Rev. 2: Please submit four (4) copies of the E&SC plans to this office to disperse to inspectors.
Items B and C need to be completed before a grading permit can be issued for this project.
File: E2 esc ADS 06 -068 Westfield Road Center