HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201100082 Review Comments 2012-01-03*Vol lvw�
Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201100082 — boar's Head Inn & Sports Club Expansion - II
SubApplication Type: JMajorAmendment
Date Completed: 01/03/2012
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
._ ........ ...... _ .................... _ .............. _ ... _. .....
-
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
............. _..- ....... _ ... _.._ ... _ .........
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Philip Custer
Requested Changes
Division: Engineering
01/03/2012
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Requested Changes
01/03/2012
Sarah Baldwin Division: Admin Zoning Review
Requested Changes
1. It appears that work is proposed (removal of golf path) on parcel 75 -63 (noted incorrectly on plan
as 75 -83) and (proposed employee parking) on 59D2 -01 -2 (noted incorrectly as 59D201 - -15). Any
parcels subject to this plan must be part of the application plan itself as well as any associated
approvals /conditions. Tax Map 75 -63 is also subject to SP 96 -53 and the conditions must be shown
on the proposed plan.
3. Please indicate the square footage of the proposed structure.
4. It is unclear what parking standards are used in the calculation of parking spaces. If some
additional parking standards or waivers are being utitlized, they may be subject to a parking study
and will require Zoning Administrator approval. See 4.12.7 - 4.12.10.
5. Please provide an upated Parking Calculation for uses on the entire site, including a breakdown of
the utilized parking standards.
6. The Event Management Plan recognizes shared spaces with other uses, which may require a
shared parking request and analysis under 4.12.10.
12/29/2011
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments: (20' buffer grading waiver request)
........... ... ... . .................................................. . ..... ... . ..... .. ............. ........ .
Date Completed: 12/30/2011
Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Division: Inspections
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: I Based on plans dated December 12, 2011.
No comments or conditions.
Date Completed: 12/22/2011
Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer Division: Fire Rescue
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated 12 -12 -11
1. Fire lane access to property should be no less than 18 feet at any point.
2. Fire Department Connection needs to be located on the South east side of the building within
100 feet of a fire hydrant.
3. Fire Department Connection needs to have a proper sign marking connection.
4. Clarify the maximum load limit for the 10,000 gallon cistern.
Page: 1 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
Fire Hydrar 'pacing for this property needs to be everyVt feet.
Required Fire Flow for this building is 1180 gpm @ 20 psi.
Date Completed: 01/04/2012
Reviewer: Joel DeNunzio Division: VDOT
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: ISee docs and pics for SRC review comments packet
Date Completed:
12/28/2011
Reviewer:
Alexander Morrison Division: ACSA
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Fsee docs and pics for SRC review comments packet.
............................... _ ....................... . .............. _ .................. __ ...................................................... _ ..... ........... ................. _ .................................... _ ............................................................................. ........................................................................................... _.
Date Completed:
12/30/2011
Reviewer:
Andrew Slack Division: E911
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
01/04/2012
Reviewer:
Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Review comments by Victoria Fort. See docs and pics for SRC review comments packet.
...... _.._ ..................... _ .... _ ...................................... __ ..................................................................... ................................................ _ ............................................................................................................. _ .............. _ ............. .... __.........................................................
Date Completed:
12/29/2011
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 01/04/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: F Report received from Thomas Jefferson Soils and Water Conservation district
.................................................. ....................... ..................................... ........ .............................................................. ..... ............... .....................................................................................
.
Date Completed: 01/27/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: ISee Docs and Pics for SRC review comments packet
............... ................... .................................................................................................... _ ...................... . ...................... _ .... .............................. ..... ................. . ................... ............................................................. _ ... _ .................. _ ........ _ .... _ ............ ...............................
Date Completed: 01/26/2012
Reviewer: Philip Custer Division: Engineering
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Multiple documents have been provided for review comments. See Docs & Pics for engineering
comments.
- - - ... ........ -- ...... ......................... ............................................................ ............... _ ....... ......... ..._..... ........ . ........ .
Date Completed: 04/03/2012
Reviewer: Joel DeNunzio Division: VDOT
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 01/27/2012
Reviewer: Sarah Baldwin Division: Admin Zoning Review
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: This application can be approved upon receipt and approval of a shared parking agreement.
All other comments have been addressed.
. . . . . . . _ ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page: 2 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
Date Completed: 01/30/2012 *4W, *"NW
Reviewer: Robbie Gilmer Division: Fire Rescue
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: IBased on plans dated 1 -19 -12 all requested changes have been addressed.
...................... .................... _ ....................... ............................................................ ............................. .......... _ ......................................................... _............ _ ....... _ ........................ _ ...................................... _ ............................................... ......... ...................._....
......
Date Completed: 01/26/2012
Reviewer: Unassigned Division: ACSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Joint review by Alex Morrison and Jeremy Lynn. The applicant is currently going under construction
plan review directly with the ACSA. The ACSA will inform Albemarle County when the construction
plans have been approved.
.... _ ..... _ ......................... _ ....................... _ ... _ ........ _ ........ _ .......... _..__ ......................... _ .............. ........... _ ...................... _ ............. _ ....... ......... _ .................................................................. . ..........................
.........
Date Completed: 01/27/2012
Reviewer: Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Review by Victoria Fort.
RWSA has reviewed the revisions to the Major Site Plan Amendment for the Boars Head Sports Club
Expansion as prepared by Water Street Studio and dated January 19, 2012 and has the following
comments:
Sheet 3 of 13:
1. Label each of the RWSA easements with the deed book and page number.
Sheet 6 of 13:
1. Label each of the RWSA easements with the deed book and page number.
2. Revise the note on CZI- MH -14A to read "Contractor to adjust rim elevation as necessary to
match final grade ".
Sheet 12 of 13:
1. Show the location of the RWSA sewer line in the landscaping plan for the employee parking
area.
As a separate note, RWSA has reviewed the proposed stairs to be installed over the RWSA
easement as shown on sheet 6 and has no objection to their installation at this location. Please note
that should any sewer line maintenance require excavation of the sewer at this location, RWSA will
be responsible for restoring surface conditions as they exist at present.
........ _....... ....................
Date Completed: 04/04/2012
Reviewer: Philip Custer Division: Engineering
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 04/02/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I Received on 3/12/12 by County.
............................................................ ..... .
Date Completed: 04/03/2012
Reviewer: Joel DeNunzio Division: VDOT
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
.......... .... ..... _ .... ... _...__.._ ... _.._ ...... _ ......... ........... _.._..._..- - ..._. _..._..._...._..__ .............
Date Completed: 03/16/2012
Reviewer: Sarah Baldwin
Review Status: Requested Changes
Page: 3 of 6
Division: Admin Zoning Review
County of Albemarle
Printed On: May 29, 2012
Reviews Comments: lagreement. As stated in prior reWw comments, this plan can be approved pending approval of a shared parking
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
04/02/2012
Unassigned Division: ACSA
Requested Changes
Sent by inter -office mail on 3/13/12
Tom Garrison and Alex Morrison at ACSA are working directly with the applicant to address
requested changes. No review comments are expected to be provided to the review coordinator in
the meantime.
Date Completed: 04/04/2012
Reviewer: Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: licanne,
RWSA has reviewed the Major Site Plan Amendment for the Boar's Head Sports Club as prepared
by Water Street Studio and dated 12/12/2011 (with latest revision on 3/12/2012) and consents to the
proposed construction. All changes to the proposed work from that shown in the drawings shall be
approved by RWSA in writing prior to construction. RWSA reserves all existing rights associated with
its easement, including but not limited to its rights to access, construction, operation, maintenance,
and repair of its facilities within the easement, and such consent shall not be construed to modify or
prohibit any existing easement rights held by the RWSA, nor modify or increase its obligations, if any,
to repair or restore.
Please note that all work within the RWSA easement which may impact existing facilities, including
but not limited to the tie -in to CZI- MH -11A and raising of RWSA manhole lids to meet new grade, will
require on -site inspection by RWSA staff. Please provide two sets of approved plans once they
become available. Additionally, RWSA would like to be included in a preconstruction conference
once a contractor is selected and asks that staff be notified at least 3 business days in advance of
any work within the RWSA easement so that we may schedule an on -site inspector.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
ank you,
_. ....._.._..._..__.._.__..._..._.._ ........... .......................................... _..... . ... _ ............ _ ................... _ ................................................................................................................. _.._.._ ..... _ ..... _.........................
Date Completed: 03/30/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: 1. Final approval of WPO- 2012 -034 (also Birdwood Golf Course Hole #3 Remodel) by the reviewing
engineer.
2. [32.7.9.4b] Submit a Tree Conservation Checklist as another sheet of the LOR submittal.
3. [4.3] For any trees that were required as part of the previously approved site plan (if any), indicate
the species of trees that will replace the trees to be removed.
.............. ............................... ............. _ ... _ ..................... _ ............................................................... .................................................. ... ... ................... ............................... .
Date Completed: 04/25/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments: LOR #1 and LOR #2 are actually tied to the original Birdwood Golf site plan, not the Boar's Head
Sports Club squash expansion, so 3 separate LORs may be submitted for the squash and racquet
club area at a future date. —JTP
._ ..... ..... ........ .... ......... __. ..... ......... _ ... _ .... __.._ ..............._...._............_...._...._..__._... ....... _ ... _ ........................ _ .... _ ................................. _ ......... .................................. ---- ........... ............................. ..... _ ..................... _ ...................... _ ............ _ ..................... _.._ ..................... _ .... __ .................................................. _.........................................
Date Completed: 05/10/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Page: 4 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
Review Status: Requested Change"'
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 05/14/2012
Reviewer: Philip Custer Division: Engineering
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: Submitted to Community Development on 05/04/12. Received by planner on 05/08/12. Transmitted
Ito Engineering 05/08/12. -JTP
............ _..._..._..._._....._._._ ............ _ ... __ ... _ .... _.._ ...............................
Date Completed:
_......................................................................................
05/17/2012
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
_ ................................. _ .......... _............
... _ ........ _............_..._........_..........._ .... ................... _ ......
Date Completed:
_ ............................... ............... _ .................... _ .............. _ ........ _ ...... _ ........................
05/16/2012
Reviewer:
Sarah Baldwin Division: Admin Zoning Review
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Submitted to Community Development on 05/04/12. Received by planner on 05/08/12. Transmitted
Ito
Zoning 05/08/12. -JTP
After our phone call today, I reviewed the application plan and transportation plan and have
determined that an actual shared parking agreement is not necessary for this site. The transportation
plan adequately addresses the shared parking and different uses for the site and both parcels are
owned by University of Virginia Host Properties, Inc.
Please let me know if you have further questions.
Sarah D. Baldwin
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596
(434)296 -5832
(434)972 -4126, fax
....... . ............. . ......... _ .............. _ ............................ _ ..... _ ... _ ................................................................... .................. ................. _ ....... ...................... _ ..................................................... _ ...... _ ...................... _
Date Completed: 05/11/2012
Reviewer: Unassigned Division: ACSA
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments: Submitted to Community Development 05/04/12. Received by planner 05/08/12. Forwarded by
inter -office mail 05/08/12. Anticipated arrival /delivery date is 05/10/12.
ACSA is working directly with applicant. No review comments are expected to be provided to the
review coordinator in the meantime.
Dear Joanne:
The Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) has received and reviewed the
plan /document/project described above. All ACSA comments have been addressed by the applicant.
The ACSA hereby approves the plan /document/project described above.
Please feel free to contact me at the number below with any comments or questions you may have.
Thank you.
Page: 5 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
Vr.r° '`✓
Date Completed: 05/24/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
.... _ ..... _ ............... _ .... _...._ ..... .... ... _.._ .................. _................... _ .................. _ .... _ .......... _ ..... ... ... _ ........... _ .
Date Completed: 05/24/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments:
........ _ ... _ ............... _ .... _ ... _ .................... _ ........... _ ... _ ........... . ..... _ .... _ ........... __ ... _ ............................ _ ....... _ ....... _ ...... __.._ ........ _ .... _.._.. .......................... _ ............... _ ............................. _ .................. _ ........... _ ......... ..............................................
Date Completed: 05/24/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments: Associated WPO- 2012 -044 approved by Engineering on 05/23/12; LOR #2 signed, stamped, and
initialed on 05/24/12; formal approval letter issued on 05/29/12
Page: 6 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
'*"e 1"W
Short Review Comments Report for:
ISDP201100 — boar's Head Inn & Sports Club Expansion - P
SubApplication Type: JMajorAmendment
Date Completed:
01/03/2012
Reviewer:
Philip Custer Division: Engineering
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
........ .................... _ ........... __.._ .............. _ ....... _ .............
Date Completed:
_ ............................ _ ..... _............. _.._ .......... _ ..... _ .................. _...... .
01/03/2012
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
_.._ ............ ............ .............. _ ............. __ ... _ ............. _.......
Date Completed:
_ ..... _ ........ _............ _ ..... ................................ ... _...._ ...... _ ...... _._._ ...... _ ... _ ..... _.._ ........................................ . ............................. _.._ ....... _ ................ _.....................
01/03/2012
Reviewer:
Sarah Baldwin Division: Admin Zoning Review
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
1. It appears that work is proposed (removal of golf path) on parcel 75 -63 (noted incorrectly on plan
as 75 -83) and (proposed employee parking) on 59D2 -01 -2 (noted incorrectly as 59D201 - -15). Any
parcels subject to this plan must be part of the application plan itself as well as any associated
approvals /conditions. Tax Map 75 -63 is also subject to SP 96 -53 and the conditions must be shown
on the proposed plan.
3. Please indicate the square footage of the proposed structure.
4. It is unclear what parking standards are used in the calculation of parking spaces. If some
additional parking standards or waivers are being utitlized, they may be subject to a parking study
and will require Zoning Administrator approval. See 4.12.7- 4.12.10.
5. Please provide an upated Parking Calculation for uses on the entire site, including a breakdown of
the utilized parking standards.
6. The Event Management Plan recognizes shared spaces with other uses, which may require a
shared parking request and analysis under 4.12.10.
Date Completed:
... ..... ......... ........... .................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ... ... ..... ........... ... . ......... ...... . ....... _............ ... ............ .............. ..... ... ..... ...............................
12/29/2011
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments:
(20' buffer grading waiver request)
Date Completed:
..........................................................................................._......................................................................................................................_..................................................... ...............................
12/30/2011
Reviewer:
,lay Schlothauer Division: Inspections
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Based on plans dated December 12, 2011.
No comments or conditions.
Date Completed:
.................................................... .......................... ....................................................................... _ ....................................... ...........
12/22/2011
Reviewer:
Robbie Gilmer Division: Fire Rescue
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Based on plans dated 12 -12 -11
1. Fire lane access to property should be no less than 18 feet at any point.
2. Fire Department Connection needs to be located on the South east side of the building within
100 feet of a fire hydrant.
3. Fire Department Connection needs to have a proper sign marking connection.
4. Clarify the maximum load limit for the 10,000 gallon cistern.
Page: 1 of 6
County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
5. Fire Hydraracing for this property needs to be every`e feet.
6. Required Fire Flow for this building is 1180 gpm @ 20 psi.
Date Completed: 01/04/2012
Reviewer: Joel DeNunzio Division: VDOT
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: ISee docs and pics for SRC review comments packet
Date Completed: 12/28/2011
Reviewer: Alexander Morrison Division: ACSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: ISee docs and pics for SRC review comments packet.
....................... _ ............................ __ ............................... ................................ ................................................................. ................................................................ .. ......................................... _ ................ ................................ ....................................................... ........................ ....... ...............................
Date Completed: 12/30/2011
Reviewer: Andrew Slack Division: E911
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
_ ..................... _ .... _.._..._ ............................ _ ........ __ ..... _ ....... _ ...... _ ... _ .... _ ........ _ ..................... _ .... ......... _ ................................... _ ... _ ........... _..........................................................................
Date Completed: 01/04/2012
Reviewer: Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Review comments by Victoria Fort. See docs and pics for SRC review comments packet.
......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date Completed: 12/29/2011
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 01/04/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: ISoils Report received from Thomas Jefferson Soils and Water Conservation district
.................................................. ....._ ...................................................................................................................................................................................................._..................................................................................................... ...............................
Date Completed: 01/27/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Isee Docs and Pics for SRC review comments packet
Date Completed: 01/26/2012
Reviewer: Philip Custer
Division: Engineering
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Multiple documents have been provided for review comments. See Docs & Pics for engineering
comments.
Date Completed: 04/03/2012
Reviewer: Joel DeNunzio Division: VDOT
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
.......... . ............................... _ ................. _ .................
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Page: 2 of 6
01/27/2012
Sarah Baldwin Division: Admin Zoning Review
Requested Changes
This application can be approved upon receipt and approval of a shared parking agreement.
All other comments have been addressed.
County of Albemarle
Printed On: May 29, 2012
Date Completed:
01/30/2012
Reviewer:
Robbie Gilmer Division: Fire Rescue
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
I Based on plans dated 1 -19 -12 all requested changes have been addressed.
Date Completed:
.. ................... ................. ............................... ........................................................................................................................................ ............................... _ .......................................................................................... .......................... ....................................................
01/26/2012
Reviewer:
Unassigned Division: ACSA
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Joint review by Alex Morrison and Jeremy Lynn. The applicant is currently going under construction
plan review directly with the ACSA. The ACSA will inform Albemarle County when the construction
plans have been approved.
Date Completed: 01/27/2012
Reviewer: Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I Review by Victoria Fort.
RWSA has reviewed the revisions to the Major Site Plan Amendment for the Boars Head Sports Club
Expansion as prepared by Water Street Studio and dated January 19, 2012 and has the following
comments:
Sheet 3 of 13:
1. Label each of the RWSA easements with the deed book and page number.
Sheet 6 of 13:
1. Label each of the RWSA easements with the deed book and page number.
2. Revise the note on CZI- MH -14A to read "Contractor to adjust rim elevation as necessary to
match final grade ".
Sheet 12 of 13:
1. Show the location of the RWSA sewer line in the landscaping plan for the employee parking
area.
As a separate note, RWSA has reviewed the proposed stairs to be installed over the RWSA
easement as shown on sheet 6 and has no objection to their installation at this location. Please note
that should any sewer line maintenance require excavation of the sewer at this location, RWSA will
be responsible for restoring surface conditions as they exist at present.
Date Completed: 04/04/2012
Reviewer: Philin Custer Division: Engineering
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
04/02/2012
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I Received on 3/12/12 by County.
.. .................................._....................._................_..._............._.........................._.............._.............................. .................._............
Date Completed:
04/03/2012
Reviewer:
Joel DeNunzio Division: VDOT
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
........ . ..... . .......... _ .......... ...... .............. _ .... ....... _... __ .................... _ ... _ ....... _..__._ ... _ .... _ .... _.......................
Date Completed: 03/16/2012
Reviewer: Sarah Baldwin
Review Status: Requested Changes
Page: 3 of 6
Division: Admin Zoning Review
County of Albemarle
Printed On: May 29, 2012
Reviews Comments: As stated in prior
agreement.
comments, this plan can be approved pMding approval of a shared parking
Date Completed: 04/02/2012
Reviewer: Unassigned Division: ACSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: ISent by inter -office mail on 3/13/12
Tom Garrison and Alex Morrison at ACSA are working directly with the applicant to address
requested changes. No review comments are expected to be provided to the review coordinator in
the meantime.
............... _._ .... .................. _ .......... ...... . ....................... _ ............. . ................ . ........... . ....................................... _ ........................................................................................ ........ _ .............. _ .................... I._ ................. _........
Date Completed: 04/04/2012
Reviewer: Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: lioanne,
RWSA has reviewed the Major Site Plan Amendment for the Boar's Head Sports Club as prepared
by Water Street Studio and dated 12/12/2011 (with latest revision on 3/12/2012) and consents to the
proposed construction. All changes to the proposed work from that shown in the drawings shall be
approved by RWSA in writing prior to construction. RWSA reserves all existing rights associated with
its easement, including but not limited to its rights to access, construction, operation, maintenance,
and repair of its facilities within the easement, and such consent shall not be construed to modify or
prohibit any existing easement rights held by the RWSA, nor modify or increase its obligations, if any,
to repair or restore.
Please note that all work within the RWSA easement which may impact existing facilities, including
but not limited to the tie -in to CZI- MH -11A and raising of RWSA manhole lids to meet new grade, will
require on -site inspection by RWSA staff. Please provide two sets of approved plans once they
become available. Additionally, RWSA would like to be included in a preconstruction conference
once a contractor is selected and asks that staff be notified at least 3 business days in advance of
any work within the RWSA easement so that we may schedule an on -site inspector.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
ank you,
_ ...... __._....._._._.........._...._..__..._......_..._.._..._ .................................... _ .... ................... _, ..................... . .......... _ ............... . .......................... _ .... _.._ ............... . ...... _ ................. . ....................... ................
Date Completed: 03/30/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: 1. Final approval of WPO- 2012 -034 (also Birdwood Golf Course Hole #3 Remodel) by the reviewing
engineer.
2. [32.7.9.4b] Submit a Tree Conservation Checklist as another sheet of the LOR submittal.
3. [4.3] For any trees that were required as part of the previously approved site plan (if any), indicate
the species of trees that will replace the trees to be removed.
.......... _ ........ _ ...... _................. _ ........ _ .......... ,........ ........ _ .......... _ .... _ .......................... _ .... _ ............................. ....... _ .... .. ...................................................................................................... ................................................................. _ ....... ................................................................................... _ ............ .
Date Completed: 04/25/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments: LOR #1 and LOR #2 are actually tied to the original Birdwood Golf site plan, not the Boar's Head
Sports Club squash expansion, so 3 separate LORs may be submitted for the squash and racquet
club area at a future date. —JTP
.._...._ .................... _ ...... _ ... _ .............. _ .... _ .... ,. _....._.............._...._............_.................._............................................................................._......................._.............................................................................._...........__....__.._................._......................_................................................................... ...............................
Date Completed: 05/10/2012
Reviewer: Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Page: 4 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed
Reviewer:
Review Status
Requested Change§'' '"90`
05/14/2012
Philip Custer Division: Engineering
No Objection
Submitted to Community Development on 05/04/12. Received by planner on 05/08/12. Transmitted
:o Engineering 05/08/12. -JTP
05/17/2012
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Requested Changes
05/16/2012
Sarah Baldwin Division: Admin Zoning Review
No Objection
Submitted to Community Development on 05/04/12. Received by planner on 05/08/12. Transmitted
to Zoning 05/08/12. -JTP
After our phone call today, I reviewed the application plan and transportation plan and have
determined that an actual shared parking agreement is not necessary for this site. The transportation
plan adequately addresses the shared parking and different uses for the site and both parcels are
owned by University of Virginia Host Properties, Inc.
Please let me know if you have further questions.
Sarah D. Baldwin
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596
(434)296 -5832
(434)972 -4126, fax
05/11/2012
Unassigned Division: ACSA
Approved
Reviews Comments: Submitted to Community Development 05/04/12. Received by planner 05/08/12. Forwarded by
inter -office mail 05 /08/12. Anticipated arrival /delivery date is 05/10/12.
ACSA is working directly with applicant. No review comments are expected to be provided to the
review coordinator in the meantime.
Dear Joanne :
The Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) has received and reviewed the
plan /document/project described above. All ACSA comments have been addressed by the applicant.
The ACSA hereby approves the plan /document/project described above.
Please feel free to contact me at the number below with any comments or questions you may have.
nk you.
Page: 5 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
Page: 6 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012
*ftoe -4400, 1
.... . ................ . ... . .............. ... ........ .... ........... .............. I
Date Completed:
................ . ........................................................................ . ............. . ...................................................................... . ........ . .................................................... .......... . ................. . ................ . .................. . ....... . .......... I .................. ......................................................... ..............................
05/24/2012
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
....... . ..... . .. . ............. . ......... . .. . . ....................... . .... .... .
Date Completed:
............... -.- ............ I ...... . ........................... . ....... ... ........ . ........ ......... . .............. . ........... . ................... . ............ . ........ . ............ . ..... . ....................... . ..... . .... .... ............................... ................ . ..... . ........... ... . .................................... . ..... . .................. . .................. . .... . ..
05/24/2012
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Approved
Reviews Comments:
......................... .......... . ... . ....... ..... ...... . .......... . .....................................
Date Completed:
. ..... . ................... . ... . ........... . ........ . ....... . .............. . .................... . . ....... . ........................................ . .... . ............ . ...... . ........ . ......... . .. . . ........................... . ..... . .......... . .... . ............. . ..... . .. . ..... . ......... . ........... ..... . ...... . .......... . ........................ . ............. .... . ..........................
05/24/2012
Reviewer:
Joanne Purtsezova Division: Planning
Review Status:
Approved
Reviews Comments:
Associated WPO-2012-044 approved by Engineering on 05/23/12; LOR #2 signed, stamped, and
... . ......... ............. . ................. . ... . .. . ....................... . .........
linitialed on 05/24/12; formal approval letter issued on 05/29/12
. ..... . .... I ... . ............................................. . ............. . ................ . ............................ .... . .................................. . ...................... . ........ . .... . ............. . ............................................... . ................................. . .. . .......... . ........ . ....... . ............. . .............. . ........................................................................ . ....
Page: 6 of 6 County of Albemarle Printed On: May 29, 2012