HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201100054 Review Comments 2011-10-14*Saw, � A *4010,
ENGINEERS
AMASURVEYORS
PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
October 14, 2011
Phil Custer, P.E.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Re: Stonefield Town Center SWM and Site Plan
WPO- 2011 -00059 and SDP - 2011 -00054
WWA Project No. 208026.45
Dear Mr. Custer:
This letter is to document and respond to your review comments dated October 4, 2011.
Our responses are as follows:
A. Stormwater Management Review Comments
1. Comment: Please provide an approval letter from Filterra that the current layout is
acceptable to them. I have concerns with a few of the structures not operating well in
the field. For instance, the water running in the curb uphill of structure 104.1 would
have to reverse direction in order for the Filterra to operate efficiently. A smaller
facility on the curb line farther south of Inlet 104 should be looked at.
Response: A copy of the Filterra approval letter is provided with this submittal.
Filterra structure 104 shall be provided with a flume that will direct flow into the
structure. Please refer to Filterra detail drawing CGT -4 on Dwg. C -30 of the plans
for details.
2. Comment: What is the minimum cover required on the roof drain collection lines to
the Filterras located in the middle of parking islands? Are the loads these pipes are
going to encounter in the parking lot acceptable?
Response: The roof drain collection lines in question shall be constructed of ductile
iron. Notes have been added to the plans to this effect.
3. Comment: Please provide a cross - section detail for crowned gutter pan between the
two sets of paired filterras (82.1 & 82.2 and 81.1 & 81.2).
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911
Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
,w *Awe
Response: A detail showing a crowned gutter pan between the paired Filterras has
already been provided. Please refer to Filterra detail drawing CGT -4 on Dwg. C -30
of the plans for details.
4. Comment: This application will require that a new Stormwater Management Facility
Maintenance Agreement be recorded. Please complete this form and submit it to Ana
Kilmer with a $17 recordation fee after reading the instructions online. Please
include all parcels contained in this site plan on this agreement.
Response: A Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement will be
provided by Edens & Avant under separate cover.
S. Comment: Please provide a completed Bond Estimate Request Form to the county
engineer to receive an SWM bond.
Response: A Bond Estimate Request Form is provided with these plans.
B. Site Plan Review Comments
Comment: The Director of Planning, in his response to the applicant's variation
request during the preliminary site plan, stated that Stonefteld Blvd is acceptable as
the development's only public street but is subject to the review under applicable
ordinance provisions. While private streets in the commercial districts can normally
be approved administratively, this cannot be done when the private street connects
two public streets X14 -234. C. 4J, as New Main Street is currently doing. If New Main
Street is made a public street, then Swanson would be violating this ordinance
provision in a similar manner. Because of this restriction on private streets, it is my
opinion that the private road network will need to be authorized by the Planning
Commission (or a modification to Wayne's variation letter citing Table II could
eliminate the need for Planning Commission review). This was a condition of
preliminary site plan approval. The final interpretation of this variance and how the
private street standards are applied to the streets of this development will be made by
the Chief of Current Development who is performing the Planning Review of this
project.
Response: This issue is under discussion with the County.
2. Comment: A boundary line adjustment plat appears to be necessary to eliminate or
modify lot lines that bisect buildings before a site plan is approved. Otherwise, a
firewall would need to be constructed on the property line.
Response: A boundary line adjustment plat will be provided under separate cover.
Existing boundaries are now shown on the plans with proposed boundary line
adjustment revisions.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 2of7
3. Comment: The plan does not appear consistent with the application plan in that
there is no park area in front of the hotel. The application plan clearly showed a
park area in Block D that was designated as "Congregation Area" that was
"intended to serve as the core public activity zone within the project ", but this final
site plan seems to show an isolated lawn area that is closed off completely by shrubs.
These areas were designated as "parks " in the preliminary site plan that the Director
of Planning reviewed when considering the variation for the site layout. Please make
both of these Green Spaces usable parks.
Response: Parks are now shown in Block D in accordance with the application plan.
Please refer to the landscape plans for further details.
4. Comment: To be consistent with the variation granted by the Director of Planning on
511612011, all tree wells and planting strips must be at least 5 feet in width.
Response: The tree wells on the plans have been revised to show a width of 5 feet.
5. Comment: To be consistent with the variation granted by the Director of Planning on
511612011, please remove the perpendicular parking spaces on Inglewood.
Response: The perpendicular parking spaces on Inglewood are designated as valet
parking and have been labeled as such. Please refer to Dwg. C -9 for details.
6 Comment: The County Engineer has approved the waiver of curb and gutter on Main
Street in the area shown by the applicant. This approval is conditioned on keeping
water flowing out of the travelway and in the parking space that a more traditional
cross - section achieves with a curb. However, because of the flat grades, there needs
to be a greater delineation between the parking portion of the cross - section and the
sidewalk. Please provide planter boxes, street furniture, and bollards along the street
in similar spacing that was shown in the exhibits of other curbless streets located
throughout the country that were provided to the county when the waiver was
requested by the applicant.
I understand why the trench drains were placed at tree well locations, but I am
concerned that a frequent flow of water may washout the mulch and other debris from
these boxes and may clog the system in the future. Is there any way to mitigate this
concern with the design? Perhaps each trench drain could be moved just upstream of
the planter box or 6inch curbs (or greater to allow for seating) could be installed
around each tree well.
Response: Hardscape features have been added to the landscaping plans and will aid
in the delineation of the parking spaces and the sidewalks. The trench drains have
been revised to provide and increased width from 1' to 2'. This will provide
additional drainage for this area. Additionally, calculations have been provided for
the trench drains using flows from the 100yr storm that assume that the grate is 50%
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 3 of 7
clogged. These calculations show that the trench drains will function under this
scenario.
7. Comment: Please provide a sidewalk around the east side of Building A -III. [18-
32.7. 2.8]
Response: A sidewalk has been added around the east side of Building A -III as
requested. Please refer to Dwg. C -7 for details.
8. Comment: Please extend the curbing into an island at the end of the parking row
west of Building A -I enough to protect the vehicle parked at the end of the row. [I8-
4.12.15.f]
Response: A curbed island has been added at the end of the parking row west of
Building A -1. Please refer to Dwg. C -7 for details.
9. Comment: Please locate the concrete island north of Building B -II —40ft to the west
so that it lines up with the concrete walkway between buildings. [18- 32.7.2.8]
Response: The concrete island has been relocated to line up with the walkway
between buildings B -II and B -III. Please refer to Dwg. C -7 for details.
10. Comment: Please provide pedestrian connections from Hydraulic Road into the
southeastern parking lots by Building A -I and Building A - V. [18- 32.7.2.8]
Response: A sidewalk has been added adjacent to Building AN to provide a
pedestrian connection to Hydraulic Road. Please refer to Dwg. C -7 for details.
11. Comment: Please provide more spot elevations along Swanson Ave. This road is
fairly flat and it's difficult to tell where the intended watersheds for each structure
end.
Response: Additional spot elevations have been added along Swanson Ave. as
requested. Please refer to Dwg. C -10 and Dwg. C -11 for details.
12. Comment: The standard duty pavement provided inmost of the parking lots looks to
be acceptable for approximately 1000 vehicles a day according to the VDOT
pavement design manual. The heavy duty pavement in the hotel lot can handle
approximately 3000 vehicles a day. It's likely that many of the travelways within the
parking lot will experience more than 1000 vehicles a day. Please use heavy duty
pavement along primary travelways within the parking lots, especially areas where
truck delivery and dumpster removal routes are expected. [18- 4.12.15. a]
Response: Heavy duty pavement is now being shown for the travelways.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 4of7
'14w,
13. Comment: Please provide more stop signs within the parking lots to allow the
primary travelways freer flow. In particular, the areas of the parking lots with wide
curves for truck traffic need the most attention.
Response: Stop bars have been added in the parking lots to allow the primary
travelways freer flow. Please refer to Dwgs. C -7, C -8, and C -9 for details.
14. Comment: Please show the potential extension of First Street without any horizontal
curves. If this road is to ever be constructed, it's not logical that any future re-
developer of these duplex properties would use up space with a horizontal curve.
Response: The horizontal curve is necessary in order to maintain grades less than
10 %. We respectfully request approval of this alignment.
15. Comment: Please show a profile of Second Street to confirm that a connection can
be made to Commonwealth Drive per Proffer 13. Similar to the comment made
regarding the profile of First Street, show this as a straight connection with as few
horizontal curves as possible.
Response: This issue is under discussion with the County.
16 Comment: Where is the low point in the exit of Main Street onto Route 29? Is the
spot elevation 77.55 the low point? It appears that another inlet may be necessary to
prevent concentrated water from flowing across this travel lane.
Response: The spot elevation 77.55 is the low point of the Main Street, (Bond
Street), exit onto Route 29. This entrance is shown as part of the plans titled
"Albemarle Place road Improvement Plan, Route 29 and Hydraulic Road" WPO-
2008 -00068 by VIKA and is shown on these plans for reference purposes only.
Storm structures 74 and 76 shown with these plans address site runoff.
17. Comment: Please remove Note 4 on Sheet C -28 and replace it with a callout of the
product number of the grate. The grate type is critical to the adequacy of the
drainage system. It appears as though Product #12.504G. FB has been specified.
Response: Note 4 has been removed from the detail as requested. A grate is now
specified as part of the trench drain detail. Please note per the response to comment
#6 the width of the trench drain has been revised with this submission.
18. Comment: Please provide a sample written out calculation for the trench drains on
grade in the tables on the right of C -23. [18- 4.12.15. b]
Response: The trench drain calculations were performed using Visual URBAN,
FHWA Urban Drainage Design Program, HY -22. A sample calculation print out has
been provided and is included with the comment response letter.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 5of7
19. Comment: Bumper blocks are needed in parking spaces where there is no curb. [18-
4.12.16 eJ
Response: Bumper blocks have been added to the handicap parking spaces located
behind Buildings A -IV, B -I, C24I, and the Hotel parking lot. Please refer to Dwgs.
C -7, C -8, and C -9 for details.
20. Comment: Please show all sight distance lines as they had been approved on the
preliminary site plan with regard to geometry and required distances.
Response: The site distance lines have been added to the plans as requested. Please
refer to Dwgs. C -10, C -11, and C -12 for details.
21. Comment: Street furniture must be shown on all streets required by Appendix B of
the Code of Development. Location and frequency of street furniture must be
approved by county staff.
Response: Street furniture is shown now on the landscape plans.
22. Comment: Where is "Main Street Alley" located on site?
Response: The name "Main Street Alley" has been removed from the typical section.
The typical section in question is of the access road from Main Street, (Bond Street),
the parking area on Development Block A and is located between Buildings A -III and
A -IV.
23. Comment: Please provide typical retaining wall details in the set. The detail should
include a handrail since many of the walls are greater than Oft tall.
Response: A typical retaining wall detail with handrail has been added to the plans as
requested. Please refer to Dwg. C -35 for details.
24. Comment: The detectable warning surface along the curbless section of Main Street
must be 2ft wide to be compliant with ADA standards.
Response: The detectable warning surfaces have been revised to show a width of 2ft.
Please refer to Dwgs. C -7, C -8, C -9, and the typical section for Main Street, (Bond
Street) on Dwg. C -33 for details.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 6 of 7
We trust the above responses and plan changes properly address the outstanding issues
and meet with County approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
WW Associates, Inc.
Herbert F. White III, P.E.
President
cc: Thomas R. Gallagher, Edens and Avant
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 7 of 7
�..► WAd %Woe
°
ENGINEERS
im SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
ASSOCIATES
October 28, 2011
Phil Custer, P.E.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Re: Stonefield Town Center SWM and Site Plan
WPO- 2011 -00059 & SDP - 2011 -00054
WWA Project No. 208026.45
Dear Mr. Custer:
This letter is to document and respond to your review comments dated October 21, 2011.
Our responses are as follows:
A. Stormwater Management Review Comments
1. Comment: Please provide an approval letter from Filterra that the current layout is
acceptable to them. I have concerns with a few of the structures not operating well
in the field. For instance, the water running in the curb uphill of structure 104.1
would have to reverse direction in order for the Filterra to operate efficiently. A
smaller facility on the curb line farther south of Inlet 104 should be looked at.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
2. Comment: What is the minimum cover required on the roof drain collection lines to
the Filterras located in the middle of parking islands? Are the loads these pipes are
going to encounter in the parking lot acceptable?
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
3. Comment: Please provide a cross - section detail for crowned gutter pan between the
two sets of paired filterras (82.1 & 82.2 and 81.1 & 81.2).
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
4. Comment: This application will require that a new Stormwater Management
Facility Maintenance Agreement be recorded. Please complete this form and submit
it to Ana Kilmer with a $17 recordation fee after reading the instructions online.
Please include all parcels contained in this site plan on this agreement.
3040 Avemore Square Place • Charlottesville, VA 22911
Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
015
Lwn
(Rev. 1) The applicant has been made aware of this comment and will work with
Ana Kilmer once all comments have been addressed.
Response: Noted
5. Comment: Please provide a completed Bond Estimate Request Form to the county
engineer to receive an S WM bond.
(Rev. 1) A completed Bond Estimate Request Form has been submitted. Bond
estimates will be provided after all WPO comments have been addressed.
Response: Noted
B. Site Plan Review Comments
1. Comment: The Director of Planning, in his response to the applicant's variation
request during the preliminary site plan, stated that Stonefield Blvd. is acceptable as
the development's only public street but is subject to the review under applicable
ordinance provisions. While private streets in the commercial districts can normally
be approved administratively, this cannot be done when the private street connects
two public streets [14- 234.C.4], as New Main Street is currently doing. If New
Main Street is made a public street, then Swanson would be violating this ordinance
provision in a similar manner. Because of this restriction on private streets, it is my
opinion that the private road network will need to be authorized by the Planning
Commission (or a modification to Wayne's variation letter citing Table II could
eliminate the need for Planning Commission review). This was a condition of
preliminary site plan approval. The final interpretation of this variance and how the
private street standards are applied to the streets of this development will be made
by the Chief of Current Development who is performing the Planning Review of
this project.
(Rev. 1) The Director of Planning has provided clarification in an email to me and
authorizes Main Street (Bond Street) as a Private Street. Comment has been
addressed.
2. Comment: A boundary line adjustment plat appears to be necessary to eliminate or
modify lot lines that bisect buildings before a site plan is approved. Otherwise, a
firewall would need to be constructed on the property line.
(Rev. 1) A boundary line adjustment is currently under review.
Response: Noted.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 2 of 7
3. Comment: The plan does not appear consistent with the application plan in that
there is no park area in front of the hotel. The application plan clearly showed a
park area in Block D that was designated as "Congregation Area" that was
"intended to serve as the core public activity zone within the project ", but this final
site plan seems to show an isolated lawn area that is closed off completely by
shrubs. These areas were designated as "parks" in the preliminary site plan that the
Director of Planning reviewed when considering the variation for the site layout.
Please make both of these Green Spaces usable parks.
(Rev. 1) The modifications to this park area do not seem to me to meet the
Application Plan's and Code of Development's intention. Originally, the
park/plaza was designated as public activity zone within the project. The grass
lawn park that's shown in this site plan does not appear to accomplish this. I have
asked the Planning Department to weigh in on the design of the park to determine
whether the current proposal is consistent with their expectations when the
variation was granted. This review will be provided next week.
Response: Please refer to the landscape plans for revisions.
4. Comment: To be consistent with the variation granted by the Director of Planning
on 5/16/2011, all tree wells and planting strips must be at least 5 feet in width.
(Rev. 1) Please draw all tree wells to a 5ft width so there is no confusion.
Response: Done
5. Comment: To be consistent with the variation granted by the Director of Planning
on 5/16/2011, please remove the perpendicular parking spaces on Inglewood.
(Rev. 1) The Director of Planning has provided clarification in an email to me and
authorizes the use of the 6 perpendicular parking spaces on Inglewood as long as
they are designate as for valet only.
6. Comment: The County Engineer has approved the waiver of curb and gutter on
Main Street in the area shown by the applicant. This approval is conditioned on
keeping water flowing out of the travelway and in the parking space that a more
traditional cross - section achieves with a curb. However, because of the flat grades,
there needs to be a greater delineation between the parking portion of the cross -
section and the sidewalk. Please provide planter boxes, street furniture, and bollards
along the street in similar spacing that was shown in the exhibits of other curbless
streets located throughout the country that were provided to the county when the
waiver was requested by the applicant.
I understand why the trench drains were placed at tree well locations, but I am
concerned that a frequent flow of water may washout the mulch and other debris
from these boxes and may clog the system in the future. Is there any way to
mitigate this concern with the design? Perhaps each trench drain could be moved
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 3 of 7
just upstream of the planter box or 6inch curbs (or greater to allow for seating)
could be installed around each tree well.
(Rev. 1) The plan does not call for planter boxes and bollards in the area of the
curbless section. It appears that the only modification to this plan was the addition
of two photographs to the set, on Sheet L -104, showing planter boxes and bollards.
Beneath these photographs, please add the following note:
Planter boxes, bollards, and street trees will be spaced at no less than l Oft on center
along the curbless portion of Bond Street.
Beneath the curbless section on sheet C -33 and in the area of the curbless section
on Sheets C -7, C -8, L -102 and L -103, please refer to the photographs and note on
Sheet L -104.
Response: The requested note has been added to the typical section for Bond
St. on Dwg. C -33 of the plans. Please refer to the landscape plans for
additional revisions.
7. Comment: Please provide a sidewalk around the east side of Building A -III. [18-
32.7.2.8]
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
Comment: Please extend the curbing into an island at the end of the parking row
west of Building A -I enough to protect the vehicle parked at the end of the row. [ 18-
4.12.15.f]
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
9. Comment: Please locate the concrete island north of Building B -II —40ft to the west
so that it lines up with the concrete walkway between buildings. [18- 32.7.2.8]
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
10. Comment: Please provide pedestrian connections from Hydraulic Road into the
southeastern parking lots by Building A -I and Building AN. [18- 32.7.2.8]
(Rev. 1) No connection has been provided from Hydraulic Road to the sidewalk
around Building A -I. When the Chief of Current Development returns, I will
discuss this comment further with him.
Response: Landscape screening is provided in this area per the request of the
ARB. Therefore the connection has not been provided. We respectfully
request approval of the plans as currently shown.
11. Comment: Please provide more spot elevations along Swanson Ave. This road is
fairly flat and it's difficult to tell where the intended watersheds for each structure
end.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
................................................................................................................. ...............................
Charlottesville • Lynchburg
Page 4of7
12. Comment: The standard duty pavement provided in most of the parking lots looks
to be acceptable for approximately 1000 vehicles a day according to the VDOT
pavement design manual. The heavy duty pavement in the hotel lot can handle
approximately 3000 vehicles a day. It's likely that many of the travelways within
the parking lot will experience more than 1000 vehicles a day. Please use heavy
duty pavement along primary travelways within the parking lots, especially areas
where truck delivery and dumpster removal routes are expected. [18- 4.12.15.a]
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
13. Comment: Please provide more stop signs within the parking lots to allow the
primary travelways freer flow. In particular, the areas of the parking lots with wide
curves for truck traffic need the most attention.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
14. Comment: Please show the potential extension of First Street without any
horizontal curves. If this road is to ever be constructed, it's not logical that any
future re- developer of these duplex properties would use up space with a horizontal
curve.
(Rev. 1) The Director of Community Development, Mark Graham, and a Zoning
Representative, Sarah Baldwin, both believed that a horizontal alignment would be
acceptable to meet this proffer /condition/requirement.
15. Comment: Please show a profile of Second Street to confirm that a connection can
be made to Commonwealth Drive per Proffer 13. Similar to the comment made
regarding the profile of First Street, show this as a straight connection with as few
horizontal curves as possible.
(Rev. 1) The latest set of proffers approved by the Board of Supervisors on
September 14`h, 2011 still included the connection of Third Street to Commonwealth
as a requirement. I will discuss this issue with the Planning Director once he
returns to the office.
Response: Noted.
16. Comment: Where is the low point in the exit of Main Street onto Route 29? Is the
spot elevation 77.55 the low point? It appears that another inlet may be necessary to
prevent concentrated water from flowing across this travel lane.
(Rev. 1) I have discussed this issue with Joel DeNunzio at VDOT and he has
assured me that the design this entrance on latest edition of the Route 29 plan
maintains a flow line between the curb inlets D -2A and D -3A. Comment has been
withdrawn.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 5 of 7
17. Comment: Please remove Note 4 on Sheet C -28 and replace it with a callout of the
product number of the grate. The grate type is critical to the adequacy of the
drainage system. It appears as though Product #12.504G.FB has been specified.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
18. Comment: Please provide a sample written out calculation for the trench drains on
grade in the tables on the right of C -23. [18- 4.12.15.b]
(Rev. 1) The calculations were performed assuming a P -1 -7/8 grate. The proposed
grate is much more hydraulically restrictive the P -1 -718 (please see 12pendix 9D -1
of the VDOT Drainage Manual). Please refer to all emails from this morning and
afternoon for all of my concerns regarding the trench calculations.
Response: The trench drain has been revised to show a high capacity grate.
The high capacity grate specified provides an open of area of 0.97ft2 per linear
foot of trench drain.
19. Comment: Bumper blocks are needed in parking spaces where there is no curb. [18-
4.12.16.e]
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
20. Comment: Please show all sight distance lines as they had been approved on the
preliminary site plan with regard to geometry and required distances.
(Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. Entrances onto streets with a design
speed of 15mph need 170ft of sight distance. Entrances onto streets with a design
speed of 20mph need 225ft of sight distance. Please darken all sight lines that were
reviewed with the Stonefteld Blvd. Road Plan.
Response: The site distances have been revised accordingly. Please refer to
Dwgs. C -10, C -11, and C -12 for details.
21. Comment: Street furniture must be shown on all streets required by Appendix B of
the Code of Development. Location and frequency of street furniture must be
approved by county staff.
(Rev. 1) Street furniture is missing from Swanson and Inglewood Drive.
Response: Please refer to the materials plan for revisions.
22. Comment: Where is "Main Street Alley" located on site?
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
23. Comment: Please provide typical retaining wall details in the set. The detail should
include a handrail since many of the walls are greater than 4ft tall.
(Rev. 1) Comment has been addressed.
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 ■ Telephone (434) 984 -2700 0 Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 6 of 7
En
ON
24. Comment: The detectable warning surface along the curbless section of Main Street
must be 2ft wide to be compliant with ADA standards.
(Rev. 1) Please draw the detectable warning surface as 2ft wide to avoid confusion.
Response: Done.
We trust the above responses and plan changes properly address the outstanding issues
and meet with County approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
WW Associates, Inc.
Herbert F. White III, P.E.
President
3040 Avemore Square Place ■ Charlottesville, VA 22911 0 Telephone (434) 984 -2700 ■ Fax (434) 978 -1444
Charlottesville ■ Lynchburg
Page 7 of 7