HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201100049 Review Comments 2011-08-22CM
Based on plans revised August 15, 2011.
No further comments or conditions.
meview aiaius: NO UOJection
paWject one
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Department/Division /Agency:
Reviews
w.r
M
Timberwood C!RBcffl - ty fgal Site DefdIDOM&M.-
Monday, Augu
Margaret Maliszewski
ARB
No further revisions necessary, but the applicant should note that the tree locations were updated on the
landscape plan, but not on the lighting plan. Landscape plan tree locations are correct.
INVVIVw OLOLUa. mpproveo
IM
on
PaWJect name, ; .', Timberwood C - tY al Site DefdIDWA&IR
Date Completed: Tuesday, Aug
Reviewer: Max Greene
Department/Division /Agency: CommDev- Current Development
Reviews
SRC:
"Parking spaces do not meet County Code requirements [18- 4.12.16] Minimum 2' grass or other than sidewalk
strip is required for 10' X 16' parking spaces.
*Handicap parking spaces are a minimum 8'X 18' with isle widths as required. [18- 4.12.16]
*Waiver may be applied for per 18- 4.12.2.c.2 County Ordinance.
*Please show the existing critical slopes. [18- 32.5.6.d]
*Critical slopes waiver request required. [18- 4.2.5. b]
*Please show new location for "Do Not Enter" sign for one -way traffic around CVS Store #1554.
*Please show deed book References for all off -site easements.
*Plans appear to show stormflows directed into Timberwood Boulevard via swale. Please revise so concentrated
stormwater does not flow into roadway.
*Watershed is Powell Creek Watershed.
* Please provide Stormwater pipe calculations for recieving pipes ... MS -19
*Please show complete stormwater systems to outlet structures.
* Stormwater drainage appears to run across, through, or backwater in dumpster areas [18- 4.12.19]
* dumpster pads are 10'x10' with 8' in front for wheel bearing (total 18' depth)
*Loading space appears to require a stormwater drain to prevent ponding and slope erosion.
*Travelways appear to exceed 10% slope. [18- 4.12.17]
*Parking area appears to have areas in excess of 5% slope. [18- 4.12.15.c]
*SWM Could not be verified prior to this review. Additional comments /requirements may be required. Please
submit documentation to support SWM note on cover page.
Review Status: Requested Changes
05
My previous comment has not been addressed. Since the parking calculations are shown on the cover sheet of the
site plan and it is noted that some of the required parking is shared parking located on nearby property, the site
plan should include the location of the off -site shared parking that was agreed upon with the rezoning request,
otherwise the actual parking calculations are not shown on the plan and it may be confusing as to where all the
required parking is located.
Keview Hiatus: Kequested changes