HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200600113 Review Comments 2006-11-29ecJ f e-
Memorandum
Date: Nov 29, 2006 rc ,
To: Bill Fritz
From: Patrick Lawrence -Se. i -
�T
Re: Site Plan Review - #SDP 2006 - 113 UVA Research Park Towncenter Bldgs. 3 & 4
L t .. [Each
4+a*e-�wd this segmV f"r wrwr-�� and r--eviovr
'n Of4he Sit@ plan
comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle County.] s r-
X T
As a whole I found the plan to be lacking in completeness; such that it may impact the scheduling of
\,i:e ' view by the planning commission.
[4.1 - Health regulations] As this document will have to be forwarded to the Albemarle County
Service Authority both the design on of the water and sanitary sewer lines need completion in design
and coordination with the location of both existing and proposed structures, limits of clearing,
proposed and future trees, elevations, and in particular plan and profile design of sanitary sewer.
3) 5
[4.2 - Critical Slopes] Critical slopes need to be addressed. There are several areas that appear to have
slope greater than 20% both in the existing condition (not necessarily as result of previous ht s.
construction) and as a result of proposed grading.
LA) x 3.) C E, 3
[4.3 - Tree Cutting] Th
crejaez&-to-he-s4iow"n-the Site Plan (C-3.0), Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan (ES-1.0 & ES-2.0), Storm Water Management Plan (C-5.0) and Landscape Plan a-conrdii+ated
"Limi-ts of Clearing" that-takes-*mte
[4.10
.2.1 Eire Protectidli] the -ction
needlor tire mot( �s �to - ffafctrressect to+v subnlj*d to_the Fire
Marshall foT
\ atMresscJ - . ---
\,Qp fkeh need to b
,proval. A�pjopriate ydraht�ofbuilding sprinklers ne e
[4.12 et. seq. - Parking]
[4.12.6 - Number o 'Spaces] The number of parking spaces is p4wmriiT detennined by the square
footage of the buildings. The cover sheet shows three dek�,� square footages for the spaces
shown on the plan: the Lease Area of the Building, 153,140 s. f.; Gross Combined Floor Space,
155,229 s. f.; and, a square footage of 154,229 s. f. used to deter the number of Loading Spaces.
slams. numbers -'r-equir-od par-king and Joading
OfAn/
e" nja be obtetined by "f the
ross poor area" ol: by a difeet feqttes-t-of tho developer, sho;ving by-pittn-thr- ric - square - footage 7 -'Io
fhl .. In this zoning district the number of spaces is determined by one
.1 r ttf-1411 1: �, V Lr.
space per 200 s. f. of "net square footage." [4.12.6] Loading spaces are determined by requiring I
space for the first 8,000 s. f. plus I space to every 20,000 remaining square feet. [4.12.13]
- *-W- the n re is supp-l-it-4-to the
&n4Adm" gymLvpm plate zeason-4o--redu-cc �.e-total-+m� 3ber -o paFking spaces
ma--be ag - t}re- ing
-- Atffiimsstra or. 13i -of
the-parkinglDt
[4.1-7.19 --- Dumpster Pads] One dumpster pad is assumed to be shown for each building, but needs to
be labeled. If dumpsters are to be used there must be screening around the dumpster and a detail added
to the plans.
[4.17 et. seq. - Outdoor Lighting] On sheet SL -1.0 shows the lighting plan with the locations of the
two proposed lighting types: 14 flat lens box type fixtures proposed for the interior of the parking lot
(Visionaire AME -3) and 23 lantern type lighting fixture (Ela Dk - 4554 - HORS). A waiver request
was made to the Planning Commission for the lantern type fixture proposed for Buildings One and
Two of this development. The request was heard and denied by the Planning Commission November
28` Therefore, either another design must be chosen for the fixture not requiring waiver or an appeal
made to the previous request for this type. (Further lighting review will be
[32.5.6 (n) - Preliminary Plat Ditnensions] "Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed
improvements including: buildings (maximum footprint and height) and other structures; walkways;
,fences; vralls; trash containers; outdoor lighting; landscaped areas and open space; recreational
areas and,facilities; parking lots and other paved areas; loading and service areas together with the
proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots and driveways; and signs. " [ Emphasis
added]
That said, this set of plans offered instead of a preliminary site plan is short many of the stated above
requisite dimensions. [3 2.6.6 - Requirements for Final Site Plan] which states, in part: "The final site
plan shall reflect the conditions of approval of the preliminary site plan. "
[32.6.6 (g) Parking and loading Areas] states 'for all parking and loading areas, indicate: size; angle
of stalls; " of aisles; and specific number of spaces required and provided and method of'
computation. Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas. " And at "32.6.6 (h) The final
site development plan shall be dimensioned to at least the following standards for accuracy: " ...
[32.6.6 (h) -6] "Proposed structures, roads parking lots and other improvements - within one
hundredth (0.01) of a foot. "
All dimensions are required to be intact as stated above with building areas calculated shown for
parking calculations and heights shown.
Working Landscaping, now 11:00 JPL
may be requested by supplying a "Transportation Demand Management Study" to the Zoning
Administrator. [4.12.12] This practice would be encouraged to reduce the impervious surface area of
the parking lot.
[4.12.19 — Dumpster Pads] One dumpster pad is assumed to be shown for each building, but needs fi0
br labeled. If dumpsters are to be used there must be screening around the dumpster and a detail added
to the plans.
[4.17 ct scq.— Outdoor Lighting] On sheet SL -1.0 shows the lighting plan with the locations of the
two proposed lighting types: 14 flat lens box type fixtures proposed for the interior of the parking lot
(Visionaire AME -3) and 23 lantern type lighting fixture (Ela Dk — 4554 — HORS). A waiver request
was made to the Planning Commission for the lantern type fixture proposed for Buildings One and
Two of this development. The request was heard and denied by the Planning Commission November
28`". Therefore, either another design must be chosen for the fixture not requiring waiver or an appeal
made to the previous request for this type. (Further lighting review vvill be
[32.5.6 (n) — Preliminary Plat Dimensions] "Location and dimensions of ' all existing and proposed
improvements including: buildings (maximum footprint and height) and other structures; walkV4
fences; walls; trash containers; outdoor lighting; landscaped areas and open space; recreational
areas and facilities; parking lots and other paved areas; loading and service areas together with the
proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots and driveways; and signs. " [ Emphasis
added]
That said, this set of plans offered instead of a preliminary 'te plan is ort mny of the stated above
requisite dim sions. [3 ,1.*CZ Regrrirertr nts r Fina Fite P ich states, i part rn l site
plan shall refle h .e6nditionx of appt''oval of the relitninary site plan. "
e (-
[32.6.6 (g) Parking and loading Areas] states "for all parking and loading areas, indic e: size; angle
of stalls; width of aisles; and specific number of spaces required and provided And method of
computation. Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas. " And at "32.6.6 (h) The final
site development plan shall be dimensioned to at least the standards accuracy: " •••
[32.6.6 (h) -6] "Proposed structures, roads parking lots and other improvements — within one
hundredth (0.01) of a foot. "
All dimensions are required to be intact as stated above with building areas calculated shown for
parking calculations and heights shown.
TO: Patrick Lawrence, Planner
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: November 22, 2006
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: UVA Research Park
Towncenter 3 & 4
TM 32 PAR. 6A
SDP 2006 -00113
The below checked items apply to this site.
X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's
jurisdictional area for:
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
X 2. A 12 inch water line is located on -site distant.
X 3. Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located 400'
distant from this site plan, is 3153 gpm + at 20 psi
residual.
X 4. A 8 inch sewer line is located on -site distant.
S. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be
completed.
X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed
within existing or future easements.
7. and plans are currently under review.
8. and plans have been received and
approved.
9. No plans are required.
X 10. Final water plans are required for our review and
approval prior to granting tentative approval.
11. Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
Comments :
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations waterline size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
.1Ly�
� ry �
f
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:
The Cox Company
220 High Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Plan preparer:
Eric Wooley
Fax:
(434) 295 -7540
Phone:
(434) 295 -5624
Owner / Developer:
University of Virginia Foundation
P.O. Box 400218
Fax:
(434) 982 -4852
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Phone:
(434) 982 -4848
From:
Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner
Division:
Zoning & Current Development _ J
Date:
December 4, 2006
Subject:
SDP -2006 -113
The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County
Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to
above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following
comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or
conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.
This plan has been submitted as a final site plan prior to preliminary approval several of
the comments may require substantial revisions to the plan and additional review. This
may affect the review timeline. You may choose to pursue this plan as a preliminary.
Should you decide on this course some of the comments may not be relevant to a
preliminary site plan. Please contact me to discuss the comments, if you choose to have
this plan reviewed as a preliminary. [Each comment is preceded b_v the applicable
reference to the Code of , llbemarle Coy n4l.]
1. [32.6.6 (c)] Provide detailed water and sewer plans for review by the Albemarle
County Service Authority.
2. (4.2, 32.5.6 (d) & 36.6.6 (b) — Critical Slopes] Show the location of critical slopes.
There are several areas that appear to have slope greater than 25° , o. A critical slope
waiver may be requested with sufficient reasoning for that waiver as provided by
4.2.5 of the County Code.
3. f4.3, 32.5.6 (d),32.6.6 (c) & 32.6.6 (b) — Tree Cutting] Proposed clearing needs to
match on all sheets of the site plan document: on the Site Plan (C -3.0), Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan (ES -1.0 & ES -2.0), Storm Water Management Plan (C -5.0)
and Landscape Plan.
4. [32.6.6(a)] The number of parking spaces is determined by the square footage of the
buildings. The cover sheet shows three square footages for the spaces shown on the
plan: the Lease Area of the Building, 153,140 s. f.; Gross Combined Floor Space,
155,229 s. f.; and, a square footage of 154,229 s. f. used to determine the number of
Loading Spaces In this zoning district the number of spaces is determined by one
space per 200 s. f. of "net square footage" (80% of the gross [4.12.6] Loading spaces
are determined by requiring 1 space for the first 8,000 s. f. plus 1 space for every
20,000 remaining square feet. [4.12.13]
5. [36.6.6 (g)] Provide size of parking spaces, aisle widths, and methodology for the
number of spaces.
6. [32.5.6(b) and32.6.6 J Provide floor area ratio, maximum height of buildings,
maximum amount of impervious cover, square footage of buildings.
7. [3 2.5.6 (1) & 32.6.6 (h)J Provide the dimensions of all improvements not limited to
structures, walkways, and proposed and existing utilities.
8. [4.12.19] One dumpster pad is assumed to be shown for each building, but needs to
be labeled and dimensioned. If dumpsters are to be used there must be screening
around the dumpster and a detail added to the plans. [32.7.9.8 (c) 3 -- Screening]
9. [4.17 & 32.6.6 0) — Outdoor Lighting) On sheet SL -1.0 shows the lighting plan with
the locations of the two proposed lighting types: 14 flat lens box type fixtures
proposed for the interior of the parking lot (Visionaire A vIE -3) and 23 lantern type
lighting fixture (Ela Dk — 4554 — HOR5). A waiver request was made to the Planning
Commission for the lantern type fixture proposed for Buildings One and Two of this
development. The request was heard and denied by the Planning Commission at its
meeting November 28` Either another design must be chosen for the fixture not
requiring waiver or an appeal made to the previous request for this type and wattage.
Reduction of the wattage may allow the use of this fixture.
10. [3 2.6.6 (i) &32.5.6 (p) J Provide a landscape plan meeting the requirements of
[3 2.7.9 et. Seq. -- site plan requirement including "canopy " requirement and
calculation) Show all utilities on the landscape plan to ensure there are no planting
conflicts.
11. [32.7.4] Include all drainage and storm water management calculations and plans
with the submittal of final site plan. The submittal must also contain erosion and
sediment control plan and narrative.
12. [3 2.5.6 (n) — Preliminary Plat Dimensions] "Location and dimensions of all existing
and proposed improvcments including: buildings (maxunnum /ootprrnt and height) and
other structures: walkwa fences; tivalls; trash containers; outdoor lighting;
landscaped areas and open space; recreational areas and faculties; parking lots and
other paved areas; loading and service areas together with the proposed paving
material apes for all walks, parking lots and drivetivays; and signs. " [ Emphasis
added]
Please contact Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner at the Department of Community Development
296 -5832 ext. 3297 for further information.
2
"lil i' r
d iL
a�
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax(434)972 -4126
Project: UVA Research Office Buildings 3 &4 (SDP200600113, WPO200600087)
Plan preparer: Eric Woolley, Cox Company [fax 295 -7540]
Owner or rep.: University of Virginia Foundation [fax 982 -4852]
Plan received date: 18 Dec 2006
Date of comments: 03 Jan. 2007
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Final site plan, Road Plan, Drainage Plans (SDP200600113)
6. Please show the location of critical slopes. A critical slopes waiver may be needed. (Critical slopes
created as a result of a previously approved site plan do not need a critical slope waiver for their
disturbance.) [18- 4.2.5]
Revl: The following three areas (seen shaded in
Figure 1, to the right, located at the southwest corner
of the site) will require a request for a critical slopes
waiver. They are not included in any previous
approved site plans containing critical slope waivers.
Additional comments:
7. The plans need a signed and dated professional seal.
[18-32.6.1]
8. VDOT approval is required. [DSM902B]
9. Parking cannot exceed 5% slope in any direction. [18-
4.12.15c]
10. Entrances can not exceed a 4% slope for the first 40
feet. [ 18- 4.12.17b]
11. Dumpster pads cannot have runoff draining though
them. [I 8-4.12.19a,b]
12. Guardrail is needed over steep slopes or drop -offs.
Figure 1
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
[DSM803.1A, DSM605A]
13. There are concerns with the existing 2:1 or greater
slopes seen in bold in Figure 2. They are not natural
and are a result of previous construction. Please revise
these areas to make the slopes less awkward.
[DSM902A5]
14. Pipe 7 is inadequate. The flow for the 10 year storm
exceeds it capacity.
15. Several of the calculations for pipe system pipes 14 -27
are incorrect. The drainage areas going to the pipes are
wrong.
16. Please contain the runoff from the front of both
proposed buildings.
17. Pipe deflection angles must be 90 degrees or less.
[DSM505E12]
18. Safety slabs are needed for man hole drops greater
than 12 feet. [DSM505E9]
19. Step down manhole protection or inlet shaping should
be provide for flow drops greater than 4 feet.
[DSM505E9]
Figure 2
B. Stormwater Management Plan (WPO200600087)
There are no Stormwater Management comments, or bonds necessary for this project, as the
Stornwater facilities have already been installed.
C. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200600087)
1. There is work outside of the limits of disturbance. Please revise to include all work inside the
limits of disturbance.
2. Please include outlet protection on all outlets and specify the dimensions of the outlet protection
for each outlet.
3. An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been addressed.
If you have any questions, you can reach me, Jonathan Sharp, at (434) 296 -5832 ext. 3025, or my email:
jsbarp( albL ulrlc_o
Kg
.
A 1,
r �Y .t,
a•
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: The Cox Company
220 High Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Plan preparer: Eric Wooley
Owner / Developer:
University of Virginia Foundation
P.O. Box 400218
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Fax: (434) 295 -7540
Phone: (434) 20 295 — 7131
Fax: (434) 982 -4852
Phone: (434) 982 -4848
From:
Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner
Division:
Zoning & Current Development
Date:
December 4, 2006
Subject:
SDP - 2006 -113
The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County
Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to
above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following
comments are those that have been identified at this tune. Additional comments or
conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.
This plan has been submitted as a final site plan prior to preliminary approval several of
the comments may require substantial revisions to the plan and additional review. This
may affect the review timeline. You may choose to pursue this plan as a preliminary.
Should you decide on this course some of the comments may not be relevant to a
preliminary site plan. Please contact me to discuss the comments, if you choose to have
this plan reviewed as a preliminary. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable
reference to the Code ofAlbemarle County.]
1. [32.6.6 (c)] Provide detailed water and sewer plans for review by the Albemarle
County Service Authority.
2. [4.2, 32.5.6 (d) & 36.6.6 (b) — Critical Slopes] Show the location of critical slopes.
There are several areas that appear to have slope greater than 25 %. A critical slope
waiver may be requested with sufficient reasoning for that waiver as provided by
4?. 5 of the County Code.
3. [4.3, 32.5.6 (d),32.6.6 (e) & 32.6.6 (b) Tree Cutting] Proposed clearing n eeds to
i match on all $heets_of he- site plan document: on the Site Plan (C -3.0), Erosion and
` Sediment Control Plan (ES -1.0 & ES -2.0), Storm Water Management Plan (C -5.0)
and Landscape Plan.
4. [32.6.6(a)1 The number of parking spaces is determined by the square footage of the
A buildings. The cover sheet shows three square footages for the spaces shown on the
plan: the Lease Area of the Building, 153,140 s. f.; Gross Combined Floor Space,
155,229 s. f; and, a square footage of 154,229 s. f. used to determine the number of
Loading Spaces In this zoning district the number of spaces is determined by one
space per 200 s. f. of "net square footage" (80% of the gross [4.12.61 Loading spaces
are determined by requiring 1 space for the first 8,000 s. £ plus I space for every
20,000 remaining square feet. [4.12.13]
5. [36.6.6 (g)] Provide size of parking spaces, aisle widths, and methodology for the
number of spaces.
6. [32.5.6(b) and3 2.6.6 ] Provide floor area ratio, maximum height of buildings,
maximum amount of impervious cover, square footage of buildings.
7. [32.5.6 (1) & 32.6.6 (h)] Provide the dimensions of all improvements not limited to
structures, walkways, and proposed and existing utilities.
8.
[4.12.19] One dumpster pad is assumed to be shown for each building, but needs to
be labeled and dimensioned. If dumpsters are to be used there must be screening
around the dumpster and a detail added to the plans. [32.7.9.8 (c) 3 — Screening]
9.
,[4.17 & 32. 6.6 6) — Outdoor- Lighting] On sheet SL -1.0 shows the lighting plan with
the locations of the two proposed lighting types: 14 flat lens box type fixtures
proposed for the interior of the parking lot (Visionaire AME -3) and 23 lantern type
lighting fixture (Ela Dk — 4554 — HOR5). A waiver request was made to the Planning
Commission for the lantern type fixture proposed for Buildings One and Two of this
development. The request was heard and denied by the Planning Commission at its
meeting November 28' Either another design must be chosen for the fixture not
requiring waiver or an appeal made to the previous request for this type and wattage.
Reduction of the wattage may allow the use of this fixture.
10.
[32.6.6 (i) &32.5.6 (p)] Provide a landscape plan meeting the requirements of
J2.7.9 et. Seq. — site plan requirement including "canopy " requirement and
C
calculation] Show all utilities on the landscape plan to ensure there are no planting
_fro
conflicts.
11. [3 2.7.4] Include all drainage and storm water management calculations and plans
with the submittal of final site plan. The submittal must also contain erosion and
sediment control plan and narrative.
rt 12. [32.5.6 (n) — Preliminary Plat Dimensions] "Location and dimensions of all existing
and proposed improvements including: buildings (maximum footprint and height) and
other structures; wal" , fences; walls; trash containers; outdoor lighting;
landscaped areas and open space; recreational areas and parking lots and
other paved areas; loading and service areas together with the proposed paving
material types , for all walks, parking lots and driveways; and signs. " [ Emphasis
added]
Please contact Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner at the Department of Community Development
296 -5832 ext. 3297 for further information.
2
IIF \l.Ii�.
Y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: UVA Research Office Buildings 3 &4 (SDP200600113, WP0200600087)
Plan preparer: Eric Woolley, Cox Company [fax 295 -7540]
Owner or rep.: University of Virginia Foundation [fax 982 -4852]
Plan received date: 30 Mar 2007 (Rev3)
Date of comments: 05 Apr 2007 (Rev3)
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Final site plan, Road Plan, Drainage Plans (SDP200600113)
All engineering comments have been addressed.
B. Stormwater Management Plan (WP0200600087)
There are no Stormwater Management comments, or bonds necessary for this project, as the
Stormwater facilities have already been installed.
C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600087)
All E &S comments have been
addressed. A bond amount will be computed
once the site plan has received all necessary
approvals.
I have added a limits of disturbance line in
the area shown on the right:
l
y, \
p 4
I
If you have any questions, you can reach me, Jonathan Sharp, at (434) 296 -5832 ext. 3025, or my email:
`sip et,albemarle.ore
m
11 .l
COUNTY OF ALBENIARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
C'harlottes�ille, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: UVA Research Office Buildings 3 &4 (SDP200600 1 1 3, WP0200600087)
Plan preparer: Eric Woolley, Cox Company [fax 295 -7540]
Owner or rep.: University of Virginia Foundation [fax 982 -3852]
Plan received date: 18 Dec 2006 ( Rev 1)
09 Mar 2007 (Rev2)
Date of comments: 03 .Jan. 2007 (Rev! )
21 Mar 2007 (Rev2)
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Final site plan, Road Plan, Drainage Plans (SDP200600 1 1 3)
Additional comments (Reel):
, 9 /Parking Parking cannot exceed 5% slope in any direction. [I 8-4.12. 15c]
Rev2: comments not addressed Eastern parkin area grades exceed %.
12- Guardrail is needed over steep slopes or drop -offs. [DSM803. IA, DSM605A]
Rev2: Please extend the guardrail along Road "C" where steep slopes are located
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
1�3: There are concerns with the existing 2:1 or greater slopes seen in bold in Figure 2. They are not
natural and are a result of previous construction. Please revise these areas to make the slopes less
awkward. [DSM902A5]
Rev2: There is a grade bust with the 518 elevation line near the roundabout (.see Figure I below).
The 518 contour line coming from the pat-king area should tie into the building from the
roundabout (shown in black), and the existing line (shown in gray) which runs hack and ties into
the existing 518 contour line should he removed
Tie 518 into
A ' building
518 ,
1 518
r
f / Remove this
i 518 line
Figure 1
. (Rev2) Please provide typical cross sections for the roadways and pavement details the parking
areas and travelway s.
B. Stormwater Management Plan (WPO200600087)
There are no Stormwater Management comments, or bonds necessary for this project, as the
Stormwater facilities have already been installed.
C. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200600087)
There is work outside of the limits of disturbance. Please revise to include all work inside the limits of
disturbance.
r'J Rev2: Cling the drainage areas as the limits of disturbance is not a problem. However, there are
still E &S measures, pipes, and grading shown outside of the drainage area lines and they do not
t have additional lines denoting the limits of disturbance area. Please boldly denote these lines.
Q
i
3. An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been addressed.
Rev2: An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been
addressed.
If you have any questions, you can reach me, Jonathan Sharp, at (=I34) 296 -5832 ext. 3025, or my email:
�shur��ialt?cnia
ra _r
kG1 AP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: UVA Research Office Buildings 3 &4 (SDP200600113, WP0200600087)
Plan preparer: Eric Woolley, Cox Company [fax 295 -7540]
Owner or rep.: University of Virginia Foundation [fax 982 -48521
Plan received date: 18 Dec 2006 (Revl)
09 Mar 2007 (Rev2)
Date of comments: 03 Jan. 2007 (Revl)
21 Mar 2007 (Rev2)
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Final site plan, Road Plan, Drainage Plans (SDP200600 1 1 3)
Additional comments (Revl):
9. Parking cannot exceed 5% slope in any direction. [18- 4.12.15c]
Rev2: continents not addressed/ Eastern parking area grades exceed S %.
12. Guardrail is needed over steep slopes or drop -offs. [DSM803.1 A, DSM605A]
Rev2: Please extend the guardrail along Road "C" where steep slopes are located.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
13. There are concerns with the existing 2:1 or greater slopes seen in bold in Figure 2. They are not
natural and are a result of previous construction. Please revise these areas to make the slopes less
awkward. [DSM902A5]
Rev2: There is a grade bust with the 518 elevation line near the roundabout (see Figure I below).
The 518 contour line coming from the parking area should tie into the building from the
roundabout (shown in black), and the existing line (shown in gray) which runs back and ties into
the existing 518 contour line should be removed.
Figure 1
20. (Rev2) Please provide typical cross sections for the roadways and pavement details fir the parking
areas and travelways.
B. Stormwater Management Plan (WP0200600087)
There are no Stormwater Management comments, or bonds necessary for this project, as the
Stornwater facilities have already been installed.
C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600087)
1. There is work outside of the limits of disturbance. Please revise to include all work inside the limits of
disturbance.
Rev2: Using the drainage areas as the limits of disturbance is not a problem. However, there are
still E &S measures, pipes, and grading shown outside of the drainage area lines and they do not
have additional lines denoting the limits of disturbance area. Please boldly denote these lines.
3. An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been addressed.
Rev2: An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been
addressed.
If you have any questions, you can reach me, Jonathan Sharp, at (434) 296 -5832 ext. 3025, or my email:
jshui llIa
Tie 518 into
building
°
518
Remove this
-
518 line
Figure 1
20. (Rev2) Please provide typical cross sections for the roadways and pavement details fir the parking
areas and travelways.
B. Stormwater Management Plan (WP0200600087)
There are no Stormwater Management comments, or bonds necessary for this project, as the
Stornwater facilities have already been installed.
C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600087)
1. There is work outside of the limits of disturbance. Please revise to include all work inside the limits of
disturbance.
Rev2: Using the drainage areas as the limits of disturbance is not a problem. However, there are
still E &S measures, pipes, and grading shown outside of the drainage area lines and they do not
have additional lines denoting the limits of disturbance area. Please boldly denote these lines.
3. An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been addressed.
Rev2: An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S comments have been
addressed.
If you have any questions, you can reach me, Jonathan Sharp, at (434) 296 -5832 ext. 3025, or my email:
jshui llIa
AI.y
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: UVA Research Office Buildings 3 &4 (SDP200600 1 1 3, WPO200600087)
Plan preparer: Eric Woolley, Cox Company [fax 295 -7540]
Owner or rep.: University of Virginia Foundation [fax 982 -4852]
Plan received date: 18 Dec 2006
Date of comments: 03 .tan. 2007
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Final site plan, Road Plan, Drainage Plans (SDP200600 1 1 3)
Please show the location of critical slopes. A critical slopes waiver may be needed. (Critical slopes
created as a result of a previously approved site plan do not need a critical slope waiver for their
i� disturbance.) [18-4.2.5]
Revl: The fallowing three areas (seen shaded its
Figure 1, to the right, located at the southwest corner
of the site) will require a request, for a critical slopes
waiver. Tlteh are not included in att} previous
approved site plaits containing critical slope waivers.
Additional comments:
-°T The plans need a signed and dated professional seal.
K. �VDOT approval is required. [DSM902B]
9.. Parking cannot exceed 5 slope in any direction. [18-
4.12.15c]
10. Entrances can not exceed a 4 slope for the first 40
feet. [I 8-4.12.17b]
1 i''Dumpster pads cannot have runoff draining though
them. [I 8-4.12.19a,b]
12. Guardrail is needed over steep slopes or drop -offs.
Figure 1
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
,� JDSM803.1 A, DSM605A]
13. ,There are concerns with the existing 2:1 or greater
slopes seen in bold in Figure 2. They are not natural
and are a result of previous construction. Please revise
these areas to make the slopes less awkward.
[DSM902A5] , � I I
PKipe 7 is inadequate. i e. The flow for the 10 year storm
exceeds it capacity.
L�. Several of the calculations for pipe system pipes 1.1 -27
are incorrect. The drainage areas going to the pipes are
/ wrong.
16. Please contain the runoff from the front of both
proposed buildings.
IT Pipe deflection angles must be 90 degrees or less.
[DSM505E12]
f8: Safety slabs are needed for man hole drops greater
than 12 feet. [DSM505E9]
14. Step down manhole protection or inlet shaping should
be provide for flow drops greater than 4 feet.
[DSM505 E9]
Figure 2
B. Storm ater Management Plan (WPO200600087)
There are no Stormwater Management comments, or bonds necessary for this project, as the
Stormwater facilities have already been installed.
C. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200600087)
I.J There is work outside of the limits of disturbance. Please revise to include all work inside the
ff limits of disturbance.
2. Please include outlet protection on all outlets and specify the dimensions of the outlet protection
for each outlet.
3. An E &S bond amount will be computed once all previous E &S continents have been addressed.
If you have any questions, you can reach me, Jonathan Sharp, at ( 434) 296 -5832 ext. 3025, or my email:
jsharp �� alh�n }�irlc._or�.
c c ,•
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review
Date: 5 Dec 2006
Subject: UVA Research Park, Towncenter Office Buildings (SDP200600 1 1 3)
Engineering has only done a preliminary review for this site plan because there was only enough
information provided to do preliminary review. A final site plan submitted at the time of preliminary needs
to include all plans and calculations required for final review, including Erosion and Sediment Control
Plans and calculations, a Stormwater Management Plan and calculations, drainage calculations, etc.
1. Please provide more up to date and accurate information for the parcel boundaries. It does not seem to
match the current boundaries. Is this site plan going to be subdivided from the rest of the parcel?
Please show how the final boundary of the site will look.
2. Please provide a conceptual stormwater management layout for the site including Stonnwater
Detention and Water Quality. Please provide Water Quality Calculations for each project drainage
area. [18- 32.5.6k,17 -303, 315B,C, DSM505.3A]
3. Please provide traffic generation figures. [18- 32.5.6, DSM601A.2]
4. Please provide a benchmark for topography. [DSM CD -15]
5. Please provide sight distances at entrances. [DSM CD -15]
6. Please show the location of critical slopes. A critical slopes waiver may be needed. (Critical slopes
created as a result of a previously approved site plan do not need a critical slope waiver for their
disturbance.) [18- 4.2.5]
K y. 4t
.- N iN � � I W ;l r ° "\ .L.., l ,I .[ _ )F V RCA 1 'v J ,`_-
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
David S. Ekern, P.E. VirginiaDOT.org
COMMISSIONER
December 28th, 2006
Mr. Glenn Brooks
Department of Engineering and Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments January 4 2007 site review meeting
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the January 4 2007 Site Review Committee
Meeting:
SDP - 2006 -00125 Vandine Plaza — Preliminary Plan (Patrick Lawrence)
• The plan needs to show the ITE trip generation for the site.
• The site lines in addition to the distances need to be shown on the plan.
• Existing features of Rio Road need to be shown along with proposed improvements (i.e. turn
lane and taper, curb ramps, etc.) that may be necessary to accommodate the combination of
existing traffic and proposed traffic.
• The entrance needs to be designed in accordance with VDOT's Road Design Manual and The
Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways and include all horizontal and vertical
features.
SDP - 2006 -00127 Flow Automotive — Final Site Development Plan (Gerald Gotabu)
• Previous site plans have been submitted for this site and the comments provided by VDOT
have not been addressed in this plan. These comments include consolidating the existing
entrances for Flow Automotive into one with a turn and taper land and include 12 feet
additional dedication for the future expansion of rte. 250. The previous comments also
include adding inter - parcel connection with adjacent dealers.
• The entrance needs to be a standard CG -11 and the pavement to the RAV line must be the
same structure as the existing rte. 250.
• The site plan does not address buck traffic within the site. The trucks currently either park in
the rte. 250 median or back into the dealerships to unload vehicles. This is not acceptable on a
tooYEARSO
TRANSPf�RtAitQA9 ERCELLE
NCE
1 9) 6 1 2 0 0 6
primary route with the amount of existing traffic on rte. 250. Any improvements or changes
to the dealership must address the existing inadequate truck circulation within the site.
The detail for CG -13 is not the most recent revision. It should be removed from the plan and
replaced with CG -11.
The CG -12C is not the most current revision.
SUB - 2006 -00393 Fishing Creek — Preliminary Plat (Megan Yaniglos)
• No comments
SUB - 2006 -00411 Ashcroft (Phase III) — Preliminary (David Pennock)
• All roads are proposed to be private.
• Other access to the development besides Hansen's Mountain Road should be considered as
mitigation for the development due to the increased use and inadequacy of the intersection of
Rte. 250 and Hansen's Mtn. Road.
Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you
have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the
applicants.
Sincerely,
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Residency Program Manager
VDOT Charlottesville Residency
434 - 293 -0011
cc Alan Schuck, Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith
Weigand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Keith Lancaster, and John
Giometti