The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP201100045 Review Comments 2011-07-01.. **..+ Review Comments Project Name: Old Trail Block 3C - Preliminary Preliminary Site Development Plan Date Completed: IFriday, July 01, 2011 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Department/Division /Agency: Inspections Reviews Based on plans dated June 13, 2011. Provide at least one van - accessible, barrier -free parking space in the mixed -use building parking garage. Review Status: Requested Changes Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: Review Comments Project Name: Old Trail Block 3C - Preliminary Preliminary Site Development Plan Date Completed: IThursday, July 14, 2011 Reviewer: Claudette Grant Department/Division /Agency: Planning Reviews 1) The Code of Development Regulations approved for Old Trail Village table shown on Sheet 1 of 6 of the preliminary site plan should include any pertinent notes. For example, the rear yard setbacks are 0, however, note 3 of Table 7 in the approved COD, states that rear yard setbacks for townhouses shall be at least fifteen (15) feet. The table shown on the site plan could be a little misleading. General notes on sheet 1 of 6 on site plan state that on- street parking provided shall not be striped. It seems it it should be striped. Should it be striped? Review Status: Requested Changes Page: *0 „ County of Albemarle Printed On: CM C O-MMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 GREGORY A- WHIRLEY COMMISSIONER OF HIGHWAYS July 19'', 2011 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments July 2155, 2011 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the July 215`, 2011 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 201140045 Old Trail Block 3C- Preliminary (Megan Yaniglos) 1. The site line easements are not the same as the subdivision plat, SUB - 2009 - 000161, which was reviewed and approved by VDOT on 2 -26 -2010. This plan shows conflicts in the sight line easement for lots 11 and 12 for this phase and 24, 25, and 26 for phase B of the development. In addition, when the phase B site plan was reviewed it did not show construction for lots 24, 25 and 26 within the sight easement. 2. Lots 12 and 13 driveways are within the throat length of the entrance as shown in VDOT's Road Design Manual, Appendix F, table 4 -2 and should be removed to avoid conflicts. 3. Recommend dedicating right of way around the corner of Brookley dr. and Old Trail Dr. to one foot behind the sidewalk. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Land Use Engineer VDOT Land Development 434 -589 -5871 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Alhemade Service Authtrity TO: Megan Yangilos FROM: Alexander J. Morrison, Civil Engineer DATE: July 8, 2011 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SDP201100045: Old Trail Block 3C - Preliminary The below checked items apply to this site. 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: ✓ A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service ✓ 2. A 6 inch water line is located approximately (ON PROPERTY) distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. ✓ 4. A 8 inch sewer line is located approximately (ON PROPERTY) distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. ✓ 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. 9. No plans are required. ✓ 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. ✓ Comments: • Additional fire hydrant will be required. • Final water and sewer plans will be required for review. • The ACSA requires a written response from our letter dated April 28, 2011 addressed to Mr. Justin Beights. The proposed 20 lots (including office and retail space) for Old Trail Village Block 3 Phase C exceeds the remaining amount from our previous 2 Letters of Agreement. 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org Review Comments Project Name: Old Trail Block 3C - Preliminary Preliminary Site Development Plan Date Completed: Friday, July 01, 2011 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Department/Division /Agency: Fire Rescue Reviews Based on plans dated June 13, 2011. that adequate fireflow is available. Required fireflow is 2500 gpm @ 20 psi. Review Status: Requested Changes Page: ,,,,; „ „. County of Albemarle Printed On: +.,r PWP_ JAUNT July 6, 2011 Megan Yaniglos Albemarle County Department of Community Development Division of Current Development and Zoning 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Dear Ms. Yaniglos, Thank you for the opportunity to review SDP201100045, Old Trail Village Block 3C - Preliminary. JAUNT has the following advisory comments related to access to public transportation within and around this site, especially for people with disabilities. • This area is currently in a rural fare zone for JAUNT where we provide trips for both the general public and, at half fare, for seniors and people with disabilities. • The neighborhood's gridded street network is helpful for efficient vehicle routing. Most units can be accessed from the perimeter streets. • Although the proposed loop layout of the internal alleys will be better than the existing configuration, the turns may be too tight for larger JAUNT vehicles to navigate without backing. Residents of internal units requiring JAUNT service might have to meet the bus on an adjacent street by walking along the private alleys. • Will there be any accessible parking provided for the office building? Consider designing at least one of the on- street spaces to be accessible. It is assumed that JAUNT vehicles would not fit in the parking under the office building, so service to it would be from the perimeter streets. • The site plan shows an ADA ramp for crossing Brookley Drive at the roundabout, but the one for crossing Old Trail Drive at the roundabout is not shown. We hope these comments can be considered in revising the plan. Please contact me with any questions. Peter Ohlms, JAUNT Mobility Manager - petero @rideiaunt.org - 296 -3184, ext. 120 104 Keystone Place, Charlottesville VA 22902 www.rideiaunt.org info @rideiaunt.org (434) 296 -3184 12. � ,2 A i Al, COD_ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 July 19, 2011 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 200 Garrett Street, Suite K Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: SDP201100045- Old Trail Block 3C- Preliminary Site Plan Mr. Collins: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Zoning Inspections Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community De37156 ding responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee '201 Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review sche . eview rvj resume when revisions are submitted. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if y have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Yaniglos Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development