Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDP200500095 Review Comments 2006-08-31
AL\ o ' 111 t COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 August 31, 2006 Rich Carter Katurah Roell Southland Homes, Inc.C W Hurt Contractors 1340 Stony Point Road PO Box 8147 Charlottesville, VA 22911 Charlottesville VA 22906 RE: ARB 2005 - 135: Hollymead Town Center - Laurel Park Dear Mr. Carter and Mr. Roell: I have reviewed the submittal consisting of site plan sheets C1 -C14 dated 9/12/5. The changes made in this plan, together with the architectural elevations previously submitted (undated), meet all outstanding conditions of ARB approval. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness. Approval received from the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, architectural plans, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. If you have any questions regarding this action, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, 2 Margaret M. Maliszewski Design Planner Cc: Francis MacCall ARB File I 11DjEngineeringPlanReviewC COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development a t' Current Development Group Project:Hollymead Town Center, Area C, Block 5, SD 000 WP0200500072.fax Plan preparers David Jensen W. W. Associates fax 296 -3510) Owner or rep.: C. W. Hurt Plan received date: 30 June 2006 (Rev2)20 April 2006 (Revision 1) 10 February 2006 Date of comments: 18 May ' 6 (Revision 1) 28 March 2006 Rev2)Review Engineer: Mark Chambers, Jonathan Sharp neerin 7 cannot recommend approval until the following comments have been addressed (listedEngtinbold). The on site road bond will be $169,550. A. Road and drainage plan: Lineeri ng Plan Review Comments Page 2 of 4 14. Please provide a name for the public road on the north side of the site. In addition please provide evidence of VDOT and the county approval for the road, or provide road plans for review, or remove it from the plan. Revision 1: Please provide evidence of VDOT and County approval for Pereseco Lane. Rev 2: Final site plan cannot be approved before the road plans for Pereseco Lane are approved. 16. VDOT approval is required for the public roads and entrances. Revision 1: Please provide evidence of VDOT approval. for public road and entrances to public roads shown on this site plan. Rev 2: Two copies of the plans will be sent to VDOT. B. Site plan: (SDP200500095) gineering Plan Review Comments Page 3 of 4 C. Stormwater management plan: 23. Please provide a copy the stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement forHollymeadTownCenterStormwaterManagementFacility2. Revision 1: Per you response letter we will lookfar the maintenance agreement under separatecover. Rev 2: A copy of the maintenance agreement is not in our files.1na5 47,osa uihyrovic1ed a+ttoos D. Erosion and sediment control plan:A,S Narrative: 1mgineering Plan Review Comments Page 4 of 4 Attachment: (none) Copy: file SDP -2005 -0095, WPO -2005 -00072 oafA./.4.. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Engineering Plan Review Comments Departmcnt of Community Development Current Development Group Project:Hollymead Town Center, Area C, Block 5, SI)P200500095, WP0200500072.3 g -r04' Plan preparer: David Jensen W. W. Associates t fax 9fl) Owner or rep.: C. W. Hurt fax 296 -3510) Plan received date: 20 April 2006 (Revision 1) 10 February 2006 Date of commeuts: 31 May 2006 (Revision 1)1 r._.._,....._ 28 March 2006 5G Review Engineer: Mark Chambers A. Road and drainage plan: 1. We would prefer the road plan be submitted as a separate package including sheets relevant to the road plan only. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 2. Please show the location of all traffic and road name signs on . the road plans (14 -423, County Code Chapter7, Article I1). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 3. Please provide edge of pavement/face of curb radii for all horizontal curves associated with the road ways, parking and alley (DSM905.D.3 &4, 14- 512.D). Revision I: Thank you for addressing this comment. 4. The K value for the Sag in Laurel Park Lane does not meet the minimum standard of 30. Please correct this condition (VDOT Road Design Manual, App. C Table C-1 -3). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 5. Please show the storm pipe and other utility crossings in the road profiles (DSM905.E.5). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 6, Please provide cross drains and under drains at all sags and cut and fill transitions (DSM 905.E.6). 1evision l: Thank you, far addressing this comment. 7. Laurel Park Lane does not meet the minimum pavement width requirement of 36'. Please correct this condition (VDOT Design Manual 24 VAC 30 -90 -380). Revision 1:Thank you for addressing this comment. 8. Please label Laurel Park Lane as a private road. Revision l: Thank you, for addressing this comment. 9. Please provide and label the access isle /ingress egress easement for Laurel Park Lane. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 10. Please continue the access isle /ingress egress easement along the entire length of Grand Forks Blvd. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment - 11. Please include a road plan for Grand Forks Plaza, include all required information and design calculations. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Er'' ring Plan Review Comments Page 2 of 4 12. Please include 4" of 21A under the sidewalk in the Laurel Park. Lane Cross section. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 13. Please provide a cross section of the Alley (DSM604.B, 14-410.D). Revision 1: 17iank you for addressing this comment. 14. Please provide a name for the public road on the north side of the site. In addition please provide evidence of VDOT and the county approval for the road, or provide road plans for review, or remove it from the plan. Revision 1: Please provide evidence of YDOT and County approval for Pereseco Lane. 15. All roads necessary for access to the site must be built or bonded before final site plan, approval. Revision 1: Please provide a Schedule of Completion for Bonded Improvements and a Subdivision Road Bond Estimate Request for all roads necessary for access to the site that are not covered under another approved plan and hand i 'w. 4 ,14 4 /16. VDOT approval is required for the public roads and entrances. Revision 1: Please provide evidence of VDOT approval for public road and entrances to public roads shown on this site plan. 17. Please label all curb types being proposed. 2, Y`'`t Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 18. Please provide inlet comps for existing structures ST -61 and ST -62, there can be no carry over into Timberwood Blvd. (DSM905.E.3.b). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 19. Please provide a check storm using 6.5 inches per hour for inlets 0-2, D-1, D -7 (DSM909.1.A, 505.G.1) Revision 1. Thank you for addressing this comment. 20. Please provide overland relief for inlet D -1 that does not direcr runoff to the corner of the structure on lot 16. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 21. Please specify VDOT, IS -1 inlet shaping for the storm drainage system (DSM 505.E.9). Revision 1. Thank youfor addressing this comment. 22. Please provide a drainage area map for structure D -6. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. B. Site plan: (SDP200500095) 23. Please show all roof drains attaching to the stormwater system_ Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 24. Please provide sight distance for the entrances of Grand Forks Blvd and the Alley (VDOT Road Manual, DSM CD -15). Revision 1: Please provide the necessary site distance easement on the Block C4 parcel (for the alley site distance east on Laurel Park Lane). 25. The standard 20' drainage easement is not adequate for storm structure D -3 and the 18' pipe where the system is in excess of 8' below grade. Please correct this condition. (See DSM 1101.B.bullet 3) Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 26. Please provide a drainage summary table (18- 32.6.6.d.4 &5, DSM909.1.C). Revision 1: Thank you jor addressing this comment en - - -enng e-aan tceview comments Page 3 of 4 C. Stormwater management plan: 23. Please provide a copy the stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement for Hollymead Town Center Stormwater Management Facility 2. Revision 1: Per you response letter we will look for the maintenance agreement under separate cover. 24. No plan needed. It has been stated by the design engineer that Hollymead Town Center Stormwater Management Facility 2 will provide water detentic'n and quality for this site. D. Erosion and sediment control plan: Narrative: 25. Please add a description of existing site conditions to the narrative, i.e, vegetative cover and topography (VESCH pg. Vll Checklist). Revision 1: Thank you far addressing this comment. 26. Please add culvert inlet protection and temporary seeding to the list of erosion and sediment control measures in the narrative (VESCH pg. Vll Checklist). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 27. Culvert inlet protection for greater than 1 acre of drainage area require design computations. Please provide design computations for the inlet protections at structure D -6 and the pipe stubbed out of existing structure ST -74 (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). [See comments 32 and 33 below.] Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Site Plan: 28. Please provide the general erosion and sediment control construction notes on the plan, verbatim ( VESCH Table VI -15). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment, 29. Please add the dust control symbol to the plan in a few placers (VESCH 3.39). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 30. Silt fence is in appropriately applied to the site. Please remove the silt fence symbol in areas up slope of proposed grading. These areas up slope of the site will need to be stabilized or covered by an approved erosion and sediment control plan before the erosion and sediment control bond for this site can be released. Revision is Thank you for addressing this comment. 32. Adequate erosion and sediment control must be provided for all stages of construction DSM907.C). The pipe currently stubbed out of the back of structure ST -74 must have adequate inlet protection designed for the site's current condition. This inlet protection must remain in place until proposed grades are accomplished and standard drop inlet protection can be used. Please design a culvert inlet sediment trap for the pipe in accordance with the VESCId std. & spec. 3.13 and show it on the plans ( VESCH std, & spec. 3.08). Revision 1: Please design a culvert inlet sediment trap for ;'fee pipe stubbed out of the back ofstructureST-74 in accordance with the VESC1I std & spec. 3.13 and it on the plansPESCHstd. & spec. 3. 08). 33. The drainage area to structure D -6 is greater than 1 acre and therefore will require a culvert inlet sediment trap designed in accordance.with the VESCH std. & spec. 3.13 ( VESCH std. & spec. 3.08); Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Er • ring Plan Review Comments Page 4 of 4 Attachment: (none) Copy: file SDP- 2005 -0095, WPO -2005 -00072 y Oti .V.RF'1r COUNTY OF ALBEMAtv,E x Engineering Plan Review Comments Department of Community Development r4` Current Development Group nay Project:Hollymead Town Center, Area C, Block 5, SDP200500095, WP0200500072.tom, Plan preparer:David Jensen W. W. Associates fax 984- 2700) Owner or rep.: C. W. Hurt fax 296 -3510) Plan received date: 20 April 2006 (Revision 1) 10 February 2006 Date of comments: 31 Mav 2006 (Revision I) 28 March 2006 Review Engineer: Mark Chambers A. Road and drainage plan: 1. We would prefer the road plan be submitted as a separate package including sheets relevant to the road plan only. Revision 1: Thank you, for addressing this comment. 2. Please show the location of all traffic and road name signs on the road plans (14 -423, County Code Chapter7, Article 1I). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 3. Please provide edge of pavement /face of curb radii for all horizontal curves associated with the road ways, parking and alley (DSM905.D.3 &4, 14- 512.D). Revision 1: Thank you_ for addressing this comment. 4. The K value for the Sag in Laurel Park Lane does not meet the minimum standard of 30. Please correct this condition (VDOT Road Design Manual, App. C Table C-1-3). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 5. Please show the storm pipe and other utility crossings in the road profiles (DSM905.E.5). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 6. Please provide cross drains and under drains at all sags and cut and fill transitions (DSM 905.E.6). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 7. Laurel Park Lane does not meet the minimum pavement width requirement of 36'. Please correct this condition (VDOT Design Manual 24 VAC 30 -90 -380). Revision 1: Thank you, for addressing this comment. 8. Please label Laurel Park Lane as a private road. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this continent. 9. Please provide and label the access isle /ingress egress easement for Laurel Park Lane. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 10. Please continue the access isle /ingress egress easement along the entire length of Grand Forks Blvd. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 11. Please include a road plan for Grand Forks Plaza, include all required information and design calculations. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Page 2 of 4 12. Please include 4" of 21 A -cider the sidewalk in the Laurel Park Lade section. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 13. Please provide a cross section of the Alley (DSM604.B, 14- 410.D). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 14. Please provide a name for the public road on the north side of the site. In addition please provide evidence of VDOT and the county approval for the road, or provide road plans for review, or remove it from the plan. Revision 1: Please provide evidence of VDOT and County approval for Pereseco Lane. 15. All roads necessary for access to the site must be built or bonded before final site plan approval. Revision 1: Please provide a Schedule of Completion for Bonded Improvements and a Subdivision Road Bond Estimate Request for all roads necessary for access to the site that are not covered under another approved plan and bond. 16. VDOT approval is required for the public roads and entrances. Revision 1: Please provide evidence of VDOT approval for public road and entrances to public roads shown on this site plan. 17. Please label all curb types being proposed. Revision 1: Thank _volt . for addressing this comment. 18. Please provide inlet comps for existing structures ST -61 and ST -62, there can be no carry over into Timberwood Blvd. (DSM905.E.3.b). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this continent. 19. Please provide a check storm using 6.5 inches per hour for inlets D -2, D -1, D -7 (DSM909.1.A, 505.G.1) Revision 1: Thank you, for addressing this comment. 20. Please provide overland relief for inlet D -1 that does not direct runoff to the corner of the structure on lot 16. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 21. Please specify VDOT, IS -1 inlet shaping for the storm drainage system (DSM 505.E.9). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 22. Please provide a drainage area map for structure D -6. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. B. Site plan: (SDP200500095) 23. Please show all roof drains attaching to the stormwater system. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 24. Please provide sight distance for the entrances of Grand Forks Blvd and the Alley (VDOT Road Manual, DSM CD Revision 1: Please provide the necessary site distance easement on the Block C4 parcel for the alley site distance east on Laurel Park Lane). 25. The standard 20' drainage easement is not adequate for storm structure D -3 and the 18' pipe where the system is in excess of 8' below grade. Please correct this condition. (See DSM 1101.B.bullet 3) Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 26. Please provide a drainage summary table (18- 32.6.6.d.4 &5, DSM909.1.C). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Page 3 of 4 C. Stormwater managemer plan: 23. Please provide a copy the stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement for Hollymead Town Center Stormwater Management Facility 2. Revision l: Per you response letter we will look for the maintenance agreement under separate cover. 24. No plan needed. It has been stated by the design engineer that Hollymead Town Center Stormwater Management Facility 2 will provide water detention and quality for this site. D. Erosion and sediment control plan: Narrative: 25. Please add a description of existing site conditions to the narrative, i.e. vegetative cover and topography (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). Revision 1: Thank you, for addressing this comment. 26. Please add culvert inlet protection and temporary seeding to the list of erosion and sediment control measures in the narrative (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 27. Culvert inlet protection for greater than 1 acre of drainage area require design computations. Please provide design computations for the inlet protections at structure D -6 and the pipe stubbed out of existing structure ST -74 (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). [See comments 32 and 33 below.] Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Site Plan: 28. Please provide the general erosion and sediment control construction notes on the plan, verbatim (VESCH Table VI -15). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 29. Please add the dust control symbol to the plan in a few places (VESCH 3.39). Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 30. Silt fence is in appropriately applied to the site. Please remove the silt fence symbol in areas up slope of proposed grading. These areas up slope of the site will need to be stabilized or covered by an approved erosion and sediment control plan before the erosion and sediment control bond for this site can be released. Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. 32. Adequate erosion and sediment control must be provided for all stages of construction DSM907.C). The pipe currently stubbed out of the back of structure ST -74 must have adequate inlet protection designed for the site's current condition. This inlet protection must remain in place until proposed grades are accomplished and standard drop inlet protection can be used. Please design a culvert inlet sediment trap for the pipe in accordance with the VESCH std. & spec. 3.13 and show it on the plans (VESCH std. & spec. 3.08). Revision 1: Please design a culvert inlet sediment trap for the pipe stubbed out of the back of structure ST -74 in accordance with the VESCH std. & spec. 3.13 and it on the plans VESCH std. & spec. 3.08). 33. The drainage area to structure D -6 is greater than 1 acre and therefore will require a culvert inlet sediment trap designed in accordance with the VESCH std. & spec. 3.13 (VESCH std. & spec. 3.08); Revision 1: Thank you for addressing this comment. Page 4 of 4 Attachment: (none) Copy: file SDP -2005 -0095, WPO- 2005 -00072 X1D • / D A 1c COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE U ©_Engineering Plan Review Comments Department of Community Development Current Development Group Project:Hollymead Town Center, Area C, Block 5, SDP200500095, WP0200500072.978_ WI 9 Plan preparer: David Jensen W. W. Associates fax 984 -2700) Owner or rep.: C. W. Hurt fax 296 -3510) Plan received date: 10 February 2006 Date of comments: 28 March 2006 Review Engineer: Mark Chambers 4 Road and drainage plan: We ould prefer the road plan be submitted as a separate package including sheets relevant to the d plan only. Please show the location of all traffic and road name signs on the road plans (14 -423, County Code Chapter7, Article II). I. l3. Please provide edge of pavement/face of curb radii for all horizontal curves associated with the r ways, parking and alley (DSM905.D.3 &4, 14- 512.D. The K value for the Sag in Laurel Park Lane does not meet the minimum standard of 30. Please f is condition (VDOT Road Design Manual, App. C Table C -1 -3). t5/ ease show the storm pipe and other utility crossings in the road profiles (DSM905.E.5). P se provide cross drains and under drains at all sags and cut and fill transitions (DSM 05.E.6). el Park Lane does not meet the minimum pavement width requirement of 36'. Please correct s condition (VDOT Design Manual 24 VAC 30 -90 -380). se label Laurel Park Lane as a private road. lease provide and label the access isle /ingress egress easement for Laurel Park Lane. Please continue the access isle /ingress egress easement along the entire length of Grand Forks Blvd. 111. Pleas include a road plan for Grand Forks Plaza, include all required information and design culations. 1 . P e include 4" of 21A under the sidewalk in the Laurel Park Lane Cross section. Plea rovide a cross section of the Alley (DSM604.B, 14- 410.D). 14.se provide a name for the public road on the north side of the site. In addition please provide evidence of VDOT and the county approval for the road, or provide road plans for review, or remove it from the plan..,. 4 s necessary for access to the site must be built or bonded before final site plan approval. CM D approval is required for the public roads and entrances. P ase label all curb types being proposed. le e provide inlet comps for existing structures ST -61 and ST -62, there can be no carry over to Timberwood Blvd. (DSM905.E.3.b). lease provide a check storm using 6.5 inches per hour for inlets D -2, D -1, D -7 (DSM909.1.A, 5.G.1) Please provide overland relief for inlet D -1 that does not direct runoff to the corner of the Nod Sid Engineering Plan Review Comments Page 2 of 3 e on lot 16 ease specify VDOT, IS -1 inlet shaping for the storm drainage system (DSM 505.E.9). Please provide a drainage area map for structure D -6. Site plan: (SDP200500095) P lease show all roof drains attaching to the stormwater system. Ple provide sight distance for the entrances of Grand Forks Blvd and the Alley (VDOT Road ual, DSM CD -15). k5 he standard 20' drainage easement is not adequate for storm structure D -3 and the 18' pipe where the system is in excess of 8' below grade. Please correct this condition. (See DSM l.B.bullet 3) P lease provide a drainage summary table (18- 32.6.6.d.4 &5, DSM909.1.C). Stormwater management plan: lease provide a copy the stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement for Hollymead Town Center Stormwater Management Facility 2. 24. No plan needed. It has been stated by the design engineer that Hollymead Town Center Stormwater Management Facility 2 will provide water detention and quality for this site. D. Erosion and sediment control plan: Narr2tive: 25:'Please add a description of existing site conditions to the narrative, i.e. vegetative cover and tgraphy (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). 26. Please add culvert inlet protection and temporary seeding to the list of erosion and sediment co o1 measures in the narrative (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). 2UeCulvert inlet protection for greater than 1 acre of drainage area require design computations. Please pre , ide design computations for the inlet protections at structure D -6 and the pipe stubbe• out of existing structure ST -74 (VESCH pg. VII Checklist). [See comments 32 and 33 belo '.] Site Pl,n: 8..' se provide the general erosion and sediment control construction notes on the plan, erbaf VESCH Table VI -15). P se add the dust control symbol to the plan in a few places (VESCH 3.39). 0 ilt fence is in appropriately applied to the site. Please remove the silt fence symbol in areas up slope of proposed grading. These areas up slope of the site will need to be stabilized or covered by an approved erosion and sediment control plan before the erosion and sediment control bond for this site can be released. 32. ..6clequate erosion and sediment control must be provided for all stages of construction DSM907.C). The pipe currently stubbed out of the back of structure ST -74 must have adequate inlet protection designed for the site's current condition. This inlet protection must remain in place until proposed grades are accomplished and standard drop inlet protection can be used. Please design a culvert inlet sediment trap for the pipe in accordance with the VESCH std. & spec. 3.13 and show it on the plans (VESCH std. & spec. 3.08). 33. The drainage area to structure D -6 is greater than 1 acre and therefore will require a culvert inlet sediment trap designed in accordance with the VESCH std. & spec. 3.13 (VESCH std. & spec. 3.08); Albemarle County Service Authrity Serving Conserving January 3, 2006 WW Associates P.O. Box 8147 Charlottesville, Virginia 22906 Attn: Mr. David Jensen Re: Hollymead Town Center Area C, Block 5 Dear Mr. Jensen: The plan, entitled "Hollymead Town Center Area C, Block 5" dated DATE, 2005 last revised December 20, 2005, is hereby approved for construction. One set of the approved plans is enclosed for your records. Any previously approved plans are voided with this approval. This approval is for basic compliance with the General Water & Sewer Construction Specifications of the Albemarle County Service Authority and does not relieve the contractor from responsibility for his work as it relates to the plan and specifications. The Albemarle County Service Authority requires that a copy of the approved construction plan be on the job site. It is the contractor's responsibility to mark up a copy of the approved construction plan showing as -built information and to provide this data to your client at the completion of utility installation. The final as -built plan shall be submitted in a digital format. A preconstruction conference shall be scheduled with the project manager to ensure coordination and answer any questions. This will be a short meeting to review the project, materials, test methods, and schedule, in order to expedite construction. Please have the proper party call me at 977 -4511 to schedule the meeting. This approval is valid for a period of eighteen (18) months from this date. If construction is not in progress at the end of this period, the approval shall be void. The pressure for water may exceed 80 psi at some meter locations. If you have any questions or if we can be of assistance, please advice us. Sincerely, 24-1 Jeremy M. Lynn Civil Engineer cc: Katurah Roell State Health Dept. Inning Dept. Bldg. Codes & Zoning Services Soil Erosion Inspector David Hensley, ACSA Inspector 168 Spotnap Road • P.O. Box 2738 • Charlottesville, VA 22902 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.acsanet.com