HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200500149 Review Comments 2006-05-26J.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:David Pennock, Current Development planning and zoning review
From:Glenn Brooks, Current Development engineering review
Date:11 jan 2006
Rev.1: 13 Mar 2006
Rev.2: 26 May 2006
Subject: Hollymead Town Center, Area C, Block 3, Rosewood Village preliminary site plan
SDP200500149)
Rev.1: As not all continents have been addressed, it is recommended that the preliminary site plan
he denied.
Rev.2: The recommendation is unchanged.
The preliminary site plan for Block 3 has been reviewed. The following comments are provided for your
use;
This plan does not appear to be in conformity with the approved rezoning application plan. A
determination will have to be made by the appropriate County officials, or the Board of Supervisors.
Rev.1: There has been no official determination that 1 know of, and the plan still does not appear to
conform to the rezoning.
Rev.1: connnent addressed. These areas in question have been removed from the plan.
2. Abington Place in Area D (SDP200500098, SDP20050019) will have to be approved before this plan
can be approved. This plan discharges into the proposed drainage system for that site
Rev. 1: no change
Rev.2: 110 change.
3. Ga the road between areas C and D, and Meeting Street will have to be approved before
t4sjiit lan can be approved. This plan relies on these roads for access and grading. Please label
GaWienn .P4xc'2 on the plans.
Rev.1: road label added. No change in status.
Rev?: no change.
4. Please clarify the date of the existing topography, and take proposed roads off of the existing site
features. It is unclear whether the existing topography on the plan is actually current. Site topography
must meet the accuracy standards of 18- 32.5.6r. p p SNOT 8Y atIL(,ON6C CONSIVVC1700' /o4KS
Rev.1: comment not addressed.
Rev.2: not addressed.
Please provide a datum and benchmark for topography. [18- 32.5.6a, DSM CD -15]
Rev.1: comment addressed.
6. It is unclear whether the boundary dimensions shown are proposed or existing. Please clarify the
boundary dimensions, as well as departing lot lines. [18- 32.5.6a]
Rev.1: The response indicates that the lot lines are proposed. Therefore, it does not appear that the
existing parcel boundary is shown in its entirety, and the plan sloes not meet the requirement of 18-
32.5.6a to show the property boundary.WtL plow FROPOS6 Q71INMRY
Rev. 2: appears unchanged.
7. Easements or letters of intent are required for all off -site work. [DSM 1102]
Rev.1: The response indicated these would be provided separately. Nothing has been received.
3 '4 5 4Y.6 Gk 4IEP.bD
Current Development
En ering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
0 Rev.2: no change.
Sight distance is not available for the loading space next to the building corner. This must be revisedtoallowforsightdistance. [18- 32.7.2, 18- 4.12.15d, DSM902A5]Rev.1: comment addressed.
9. Parking islands are required to protect parking rows. [DSM902A5, 18- 32.7.2, 18- 4.12.15f]Rev.]: islands have not been provided next to rows laheled 4 and 8.
Rev.2: unchanged.
10. The proposed second access on
L KW
for the parking lot to the south must be removed. [18-32.7.2.4, 32.7.3.2, DSM607B, ZMA]
Rev.1. Content not addressed. The developer has indicated this arrangement is for Attire structuredparking. At such time as the structured parking is actually proposed, this entrance can be proposedwithit. Currently, it is not part of the zoning approval, and it does not work well with the roadway.Rev.2: Disregard. This area of the plan has been removed.vYlL L 40 (W rtt TREO • PARKING o SrR.r11. The loading area and parking on either side of the road /travelway is too close to the entrance Onto MAY BE CovklTGatheringPlace. A tangent section is preferred, and 20' is suggested, with adequate radii. (Therezoningplandidnotshowparkingonthisroad/travelway.) VDOT minimum 12.5' radii should beused.
Rev.1: This comment has not been satisfactorily addressed. The response indicates a 20' tangentsectionhasbeenprovided, hut the plan does not have a tangent section at the entrance radii.Rev.2: no change.
t
3 Lov S pi- ENTKPIc6. 1 Rb+trOvt l0
1 ilitisrghtoir r
tZ11a