HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200600043 Review Comments 2005-07-26ffN.l
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Bill Fritz, designated Agent for Current Development
From: Glenn Brooks, designated County Engineer for Current Development
Date: 26 July 2005
Subject: Private street standard for streets serving non - residential, non - agricultural, attached
residential, multi -unit residential and combined residential and non - residential uses.
As the designated County Engineer for Current Development, this is my recommendation for an alternative
private street standard according to Subdivision Ordinance section 14 -412B; (referenced from 18- 32.7.3
and 14 -233)
B. Private streets serving non - residential, non - agricultural, attached residential, multi -unit residential
and combined residential and non - residential uses. Each private street authorized to serve non - residential, non-
agricultural, attached residential, multi -unit residential and combined residential and non - residential uses under
sections 14 -232 or 14 -233 shall satisfy Virginia Department of Transportation standards or an alternative
standard deemed adequate by the agent, upon the recommendation of the county engineer, to be equivalent to
or greater than the applicable standard in the design standards manual, so as to adequately protect the public
health, safety or welfare. The agent may require minimum travelway widths to provide for on- street parking
upon a determination that the provisions for off - street parking may be inadequate to reasonably preclude
unauthorized on- street parking.
The recommended alternative standard is;
Maximum Grade: 10%
Minimum Sight Distance: 100 ft.
Minimum Horizontal Curvature: as necessary to maintain sight distance
Minimum Vertical Curvature: crest K = 5, sag K = 15
Minimum Width, curb face to curb face: 20' without parking, or 24' travelway parking dimensions as
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
All other applicable standards are to be per VDOT Subdivision Street requirements, such as guardrail and
pavement design requirements. Clear zone requirements and recommended speeds are not deemed
applicable. Turnarounds are not necessary in parking areas where adequate space has been provided for
backing, and three -point turns, and emergency vehicle access as indicated by the Fire /Rescue Department.
Minimum curb radii at intersections are to be 12.5' feet according to VDOT standards.
This standard is meant to match the standards from the Zoning Ordinance used for parking areas and
travelways (section 18- 4.12.15). We have discussed this reasoning many times in the past, essentially that
an accessway deemed safe and convenient for the intended use remains safe and convenient regardless of
whether it is subdivided or not, calling it a travelway or a street.
We now have a number of site plans under review which require this policy clarification, and there is no
guidance currently available in the Design Manual as referenced in the Subdivision Ordinance adopted last
month. Should this standard be deemed adequate by the Agent, it is recommended it be included in the
Design Manual upon the next revision.
q
J
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
From: Glenn Brooks, Current Development engineering review
Date: 16 Nov 2005, Rev. 1: 14 Feb 20065
Subject: Luxor at Pantops, preliminary site plan (SDP200500 1 1 7)
The preliminary site plan for Luxor at Pantops has been reviewed. The following continents must be
satisfactorily addressed before approval can be recommended,
Rev. 1: As not all continents have been addressed Site Review, it is reconnnended that the preliminary
site plan be denied. Detailed comments regarding each item are provided below.
Existing topography must be provided. It must be current to the time of submittal or revision. The plan
does not appear to be accurate, nor reflect neighboring structures and other details. [18- 32.5.6d]
Rev. 1: The topography appears reasonably accurate. It ntav need to he updated with ongoing
activities bcfore,final site plan and erosion control plan approval.
The source of topography must be provided. [18 32.5.6a]
Rev. I. Cornrnent addressed.
3. The source of the boundary survey must be provided. [18- 32.5.6a]
Rev. I. Contntent addressed.
4. The proposed grading must be provided. There are stray lines on the drawings which are not
understood. There appear to be significant errors with the grading around the ponds [18- 32.5.6d]
Rev. l: The proposed grading is cut cuff on sheet 9. There appears to he grading, for the recreation
area and drainage items which are not complete.
5. Areas of the site where existing slopes are 25% or greater must be provided. [18- 32.5.6d]
Rev. l: Continent addressed. Please see the separate rnentorandurn regarding the waiver to develop
on areas of critical slopes.
6. Existing and proposed streets must be provided. [32.5.6i] The Luxor roads are not all existing as
indicated on the plans. The phase III Luxor roads have not been approved.
Rev. I. The road plans fin- phases 2 and 3 in Luxor are approved. This plan has changed sonic of the
grading and drainage otttfalls, and it is not clear on this plant ivhat the divisions between the two
projects ti ill be. 1Vhich proposed contours arc,for this plant, and which are fin the road plans?
7. It has not been established that stormwater management has been accommodated for this project. The
approval of the stormwater management plan for the ponds was rescinded, due to changes being made
to the plans subsequent to approval, as reflected on road plan revisions. In addition, the drainage areas
and impervious cover assumptions of the pond computations do not appear to agree with the
preliminary site plan. The impervious coverage and areas must agree with the computations and
drainage area maps.
Rev. 1: Cornrnent not addressed. The stormwater management plus fir Luxor hers been re- approved.
Hotii'ever, some of the area a.ssnrned to he undeveloped in the .storntti ester managcnnent plan is
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
proposed to be developed on this plan. C017"ectiOns need to be made.
Proposed changes to the pond areas must be approved on a revised stormwater management plan prior
to approval of the preliminary site plan. This plan has proposed changes to the dam of Pond #2, a
reduction in one of the forebays, and elimination of the access road to the forebay, which must be
replaced.
Rev. l: The new stormwater management plan shows the spillway for pond #2 being removed.
However, that grading has changed with this plan, and one of the forebays is still shown regraded. In
addition, the access road to the ,forebays has not been replaced. The site plan and stortnivater plan
must be revised to accommodate these changes.
Principle access must be free of flooding, and structures also. [18- 32.7.2.3, 14 -410F, 18 -30.3]
Proposed units 145 -157, between the ponds, will not meet these requirements. Overland flow relief
must be accommodated.
Rev. l: Connncnt not addressed. Overland relief away from the units must be provided for the
proposed development to be safe. The proposed development in this area is still at risk of flooding
and erosion if the pond outlet structures should,fail.
10. Easements or letters of intent for off -site work are required. This plan appears to show proposed work
on Fontana property. [DSM 1102]
Rev. l: Comment addressed with Luxor plans.
11. A parcel interconnection should be provided to the property line in front of units 72 -73. [18- 32.7.3,
14 -409]
Rev. l: Connnent not addressed. Please show the road built to the property line with reser rations for
grading and construction to connect.
12. The abrupt corner in the private road next to units 175 -176 should be revised to a standard road curve.
18- 32.7.2, DSM902A5, 14 -412B]
Rev. 1: The abrupt corner is still on the plan, however this travelway is now an alley, tirith a lesser
standard, which makes this corner acceptable with a sight distance easement to he provided.
13. The height of retaining walls next to residential units is a safety concern on this plan. Final plans will
need to make safety provisions, or reduce retaining wall heights.
Rev. l: Safety concerns on the ~malls can be addressed with final plans.
14. Adequate road frontage has not been provided for lots 196 -198, which will be a hindrance to
subdivision, per 14 -403.
Rev. l: This comment addressed by the new road layout.
15. The drainage through the rear of lots will need to be in easement on final plans. [18- 32.6.6, DSM
Chapt. 11 ]
Rev. l: Corrnnent partially addressed by regrading. Drainage through the rear of lots is still a
concern with lots 1 -16, 64 -102, and 149 -160.
Because some of these comments may require extensive revisions, and not all information was provided,
additional continents may be necessary when revisions are made.
Rev. l: See below.
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
16. Rev. l: Sight distance and merging of vehicles at the intersection created by the split in Pavillions
Court is a concern. [18-32. 7.2] The 10' retaining wall next to the travelnay is a safety concern and
will require guardrail. Please revise this roadway to a standard intersection with intersection angle
greater than 80 degrees per 14 -410B, or a single roadway.
03/17/06 FRI 10:07 FAX 434 972 4035 DIV OF CLIKREiv ' llhvtt,urBlr. -,- V ,
n
COUNTY OF ALBEM
Department of Community Development
401 .McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
Phone 434) 296 -5832 _ Fax (434) 9724126
March 17, 2006
Katurah Roell
Virginia Land Company
P0 Box 8147
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: SDP- 2005 -4117 Luxor at Pautops Preliminary Site Plan
Dear Sir:
The Planning Commission approved the critical slopes waiver and open space appropriateness for the
above - referenced site plan at its March 14, 2006 meeting with the following conditions:
1. [ 13.4. 1] A conservation plan as specified in section 32.7.9 must be approved by the Zoning; & Current
Development Division of the Department of Community Development with a copy of the original
conservation plan and all subsequent revisions to be submitted to thi, Zoning & Current Development
Division.
2. [14 -317, 18 -4.71 Submittal of covenants or other such instrument which evidences the establishment of
an owners' association and provides for ownership and maintenance; of proposed open space. Such
document shall be subject to County Attorney review and approval and shall be in accordance with
Section 14 -317 of the Subdivision Ordinance - Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain
improvements.
The Department of Community Development hereby grants administrative approval to the above
referenced site plan.
The approval of the preliminary site plan is valid for (1) one year in accordance with Section 32.4.3.1 of
Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code. Therefore, the preliminary approval shall expire on March 17,
2007. If the preliminary site plan approval expires, a new application trust be filed and processed.
Please address all of the requirements and conditions listed below and submit eight (8) tentative plan
copies to the Department of Community Development. This letter must: be submitted with the tentative
plates, as a checklist, to document that you have addressed all requirements or conditions, or the tentative
plan will be denied.
Erosion arid Sediment Control, BMP Stormwater Management, and road plans with the associated
applications and fees must also be submitted with the eight (8) tentative Plans.
Once the tentative plan is submitted and reviewed you will receive comments from all
departments /divisions /agencies t hate made comment ou the tentative plan. Any further
responses must be made directly to each department/division /agency that has further comment.
03/17/06 FRI 16:07 FAX 434 972 4035 DIV OF CURRENT DEVFLUME
After all aforementioned departmentsldivisions /agencies have granted tentative approval, you must
verify with the planner that you may submit the final mylars (2 sets), paper copies (2 sets), the final
site plan application, and final site plant fee to the Department of Community Development. Signing
of the plans will occur within one week once it is determined that the final site plan mylars reflect all
tentative approvals.
The final site plan will be subject to all final site plan requirements (Zoning Ordinance Section 32.6), in
addition to the following conditions.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature
until tentative approvals for the following conditions have been obtained:
Zoning & Current Development approval to include:
18- 32.6.3] Approval of a landscape plan in compliance with Section 32.79. Specifically
needing to meet the 20% canopy requirement;
18- 32.6.6.j and 18 -4.17] Submittal of a description and photograph or diagram and show
the location of each type of outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens.
Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in ffie future that are not shown on this
plan shall require an amendment to this plan;
18-32.6-6.j and 18 -4.17] Submittal of a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating
that parking area luminaires are in compliance with 4.17.4.b
18- 32.6.4.1 ] The final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of
Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board.
Please contact Francis MacCall at 296 if you have questions or require additional information.
Engineering ap rn oval to include:
18- 32.5.6d]The proposed grading must be provided. There are stray lines on the
drawings which are not understood. There appear to be significant errors with the grading
around the ponds. The proposed grading is cut off on sheet 9. There appears to be
grading for the recreation area and drainage items which are not complete.
32.5.6i] Existing and proposed streets must be provided. The Luxor roads are not all
existing as indicated on the plans. The phase M Luxor roads have not been approved. The
road plans for phases 2 and 3 in Luxor are approved. This plan has changed some of the
grading and drainage outfalls, and it is not clear on this plan what the divisions between
the two projects will be. Which proposed contours are for this plan, and which are for the
road plans?
It has not been established that stormwater management has been accommodated for this
project. The approval of the stormwater management plan. for the ponds was rescinded,
due to changes being made to the plans subsequent to approval, as reflected on road plan
revisions. In addition, the drainage areas and impervious cover assumptions of the pond
computations do not appear to agree with the preliminary site plan. The impervious
coverage and areas must agree Nvith the computations avid drainage area maps. The
stormwater management plan for Luxor has been re- approved. However, sonic of the area
assumed to be undeveloped in the stormwater management plan is proposed to be
developed on this plan. Corrections need to be made.
Proposed changes to the pond areas mast be approved on a revised stormwater
management plan prior to approval of the preliminary site plan. This plan has proposed
changes to the dam of Pond #2, a reduction in one of the forebays, and elimination of the
access road to the forebay, which must be replaced. The new stormwater management
plan shows the spillway for pond #2 being removed. However, that grading has changed
with this plan, and one of the forebays is still shown re, In addition, the access road
41 UUJ
03/17/06 FRI 16:08 FAX 434 972 4035 DIN' OF CURRENT DEVLLUFMt
to the forebays has not been replaced. The site plan and stormwater plan must be revised
to accommodate these changes.
18- 32.7.2.3, 14.41 OF, 18 -30.3] Principle access must tie free of flooding and structures
also. Proposed units 145 -157, between the ponds, will r..ot meet these requirements.
Overland flow reliefmust be accommodated_ Overland relief away from the units must be
provided for the proposed development to be safe. The proposed development in this area
is still at risk of flooding and erosion if the pond outlet structures should fail.
18- 32.7.3, 14 -4091 A parcel interconnection should be provided to the property line in
front of units 72 -73. Please show the road built to the property line with reservations for
grading and construction to connect.
18- 32.7.2, DSM902A5, 14412B] The abrupt comer in the private road next to units
175 -176 should be revised to a standard road curve. The abrupt corner is still on the plan,
however this travelway is now an alley, with a lesser sundard, which makes this corner
acceptable with a sight distance easement to be provided.
The height of retaining walls next to residential units is a safety concern on this plan. Final
plans will need to make safety provisions, or reduce retaining wall heights_ Safety
concerns on the walls can be addressed with final plans.
18- 32.6.6, DSM Chapter 11] The drainage through the rear of lots will need to be in
easement on final plans. Comment partially addressed by regarding. Drainage through the
rear of lots is still a concern with lots 1 -16, 64.102, and 149 -160.
All applicable items as specified in the Design Standards Manual, Section 902 B.
Please contact Glenn Brooks at 296 -5532 if you have questions or requite additional information.
Albemarle County Service Authority approval to include:
Review and approval of all final water and sewer plans.
Please contact Gary Whelan at 977 -4511 if you have questions or require additional information.
Fire & Rescue approval to include: -
El [14 -418] Verify adequate fire flow is available.
Please contact James Barber at 296 -5833 if you have questions or require additional information.
VDOT approval to include:
CI Review and approval of all final road plans and drainage computations.
Please contact John 'Winn at 293 -0014 if you have questions or require additional information_
Sincerely,
Francis H MacCall
Senior Planner
Zoning & Current Development
U. VV4
File: SDP - 2005 -00117
Review Comments
Project Name: Pavilions at Pantops Phase I - Final Final — Residential — Administrative
Date Completed: Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Reviewer: Gary Whelan
Department/Division /Agency: ACSA
Reviews Comments Water and sewer construction drawings must be reviewed and approved before approval is
granted.
Gary
Review Status: Pending
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed 0 Friday, June 09, 2006
Review Comments
Project Name: Pavilions at Pantops Phase I - Final Final — Residential — Administrative
Date Completed: Saturday, May 20, 2006
Reviewer: James Barber
Department/Division /Agency: Fire Rescue
Reviews Comments
Dead -end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with
an approved area for turning around fire apparatus (Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code
503.2.5).
Review Status: Requested Changes
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed 0 Friday, June 09, 2006
J oFA1 r
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Justin Shimp
From: Francis H. MacCall, Senior Planner
Division: Zoning & Current Development
Date: 6 /9/06
Subject: SDP - 2006 -0043 Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1 Final Site Plan
The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department
Community Development will approve the final site plan when the following items have been
satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle.]
1. [ 14 -317, 18 -4.7] Submit the covenants or other such instrument which evidences the
establishment of an owners' association and provides for ownership and maintenance of the
proposed open space and private streets and alleys. Such document shall be subject to County
Attorney review and approval and shall be in accordance with Section 14 -317 of the
Subdivision Ordinance - Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements.
2. [4.12.16 c2] The parallel parking spaces need to be 9' X 20'
3. [32.7.2.8] Provide CG -12 curb cuts at all transitions from sidewalk to travelways.
4. [32.6.6 tj Provide the signature panel as follows. Provide this panel for all future submittal
for site plans.
APPROVALS DATE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNER/ZONING
ENGINEER
INSPECTIONS
ARB
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE RESCUE
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY
VIRGINIA DEPARTMNENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
5. [32.7.9] Consider providing landscaping all the way around both of the stormwater facilities.
6. [32.7.9] More street trees are needed along Verona Drive.
7. [32.7.9] The plan cuts off at the basketball court. Show the plan all the way to the proposed
property line and provide additional street trees along that portion.
8. [32.7.9] The numbers of plantings in schedule and what is shown on the plan do not match.
Please verify and correct as needed.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional
information.
Copy: SDP -2006 -0043
Albemarle County
Engineering review comments
Page 4 of 4
limit signs should be on each street.
Rev.2: comment does not appear adequately addressed. Locations for County 911
street name signs and speed limit signs not found. Please provide locations for the
County required" signs on the road plans.
4. The waivers for 12% grade on Whispering Hollotit• are .slipported. The waiverfior a 12%
grade can be supported on Verona Court if parking is removed along this section of road.
Rev.2: continent addressed.
S. The sag curve orz Verona Court does not ineet inininzuln standards.
Rev?: comment adch•esscd.
6. The sag curve on Whispering Hollow does not meet inininnan standards.
y Rev. 2: comment addressed.
7. On Whispering Hollow the road vertical curvature needs to transition into a negative 2%
grade oll'Rolkin Road.
v Rev. 2: comment addressed.
8. Please droll' cross-& ins and lmderdrain.s where required per VDOT standards oil the plan
and profile.
v Rev. 2: comment adth- essed.
C. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan: (WP0200400011)
An amended stormwater management plan was submitted on May 22. Comments will be forth coming.
Rev. l: The stormwater plan amenthnent has been approved, and the updated infuriation and
grading should appear on this plan.
Rev. 2. comment ad(h— sled
D. Erosion Control Plan:
An erosion control plan was not included with this submittal.
Rev.l:.an erasion control plan has not been received.
Rev.2: k, - C Plan has beer! subnitted and ii be revieli sepal-citely.
12
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: The Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1 9 73 —(4S -e
Plan preparer: - --- Justin ShiWp, The Engineering Groupe Inc. (fax 296.649 )
Owner or rep.: KafiuuTn)g---R ell, North Pantops Townhouses LLC (fax 296 -3510)
Plan received date: 02 May 2006
Date of comments: 05 July 2006
Reviewer: Mark Chambers
A. Final site plan:
r 1. The final set of drawings must have a signed and dated professional seal (18- 32.6.1).
2. Please provide typical sections for proposed stornwater conveyance channels and
incorporate the channels into proposed topography on the plan view drawings (18-
32.6.6.d.1).
3. Please provide a drainage summary table (I 8- 32.6.6.d.1 &2, DSM- 909.1.13.1)).
4. Please dimension and label storm structures on the plan view drawing i.e. pipe length,
diameter, material, inlet type and rim or top elevation (18- 32.6.6.d.3, DSM- 909.1.B.2 4 &7).
5. Please provide a drainage easement over storm system P4 through P1 where it crosses
private property.
6. Please provide scour protection at the end of all pipe and channel outlets (DSM - 909.1.13.3,
505.C.6, 505.D.13).
7. Please extend all pipe outlets to the bottom of slopes or provide an adequate channel to the
bottom of slopes [DSM- 803.1.0 and 505.0 (4)].
8. Please specify VDOT inlet shaping (IS -1) or provide manhole protection everywhere flow
drop is greater than 4' in manhole structures (DSM- 505.D.9).
9. Please provide safety stabs for manholes greater than 10' deep (DSM- 505.D.9).
10. For inlets in a sump condition, please provide capacity computations using I value of 6.5
in /hr (DSM- 505.G. I ).
11. Please provide capacity and velocity computations for proposed channels (DSM 505.C.1).
12. Pipe velocity for design flow must be less the 10 fps (DSM- 505.E.7).
13. Please review your pipe comps, in some instances flow accumulation (ACC "Q ") is not
adding up.
14. Please provide comps for the existing storm system down stream of proposed structure 45 to
demonstrate adequacy of the existing system for the added flow.
15. Please review your inlet comps, bypass from one inlet must be intercepted by another inlet.
An inlet in a sump cannot have bypass to an outlet as indicated in the comps (see inlet 40
bypass target is structure 39 which is an outlet), Inlets in a sump condition like 40 must pass
the flow from a "check storm" with an I value of 6.5 without overtopping the curb (see
comment #9). [DSM- 505.G.1 ]
16. The following places need stormwater infrastructure to convey runoff:
a. East end of Wispering Hollow Lane;
b. The turn around at the end of Montessori Terrace;
c. The Corner of the parking lot in front of lot 161;
d. Please pipe the runoff from the parking area and travel way behind units
143 — 148;
e. The existing pipe outletting beside lot 1.
17. The parking island in front of lot 205 doesn't provide for stormwater to pass through at the
curb line.
18. Please address the unusual curb configurations along Verona Drive and Rolkin Road where
the curb tails out into the adjacent parcels.
19. Please provide curb and gutter along the south end of Verona Court.
20. Guardrail is required at the end of Whispering Hollow Lane to prevent vehicles from going
over the retaining wall.
21. Please remove the curb separating the perpendicular parking from the street on the "Typical
Detail- Private Road with Parking" (sheet 3). Pavement design and other road requirements
will be reviewed with the road plan.
22. Please show the sanitary laterals and ensure they are covered by an appropriate easement.
23. Where public side walks cross private lots they need to be in access easements.
24. Please extend the public side walk in front of, and, add a lead walk to, unit 103.
25. Access isles, parking stalls alleys and roads exceed the maximum 10% gradient in the
following areas: (i) Behind units 52 -63; (ii) Wispering Hollow Lane near lot 149; (iii) Alley
off corner of lot 17; (iv) Alley north of lot 57. Please design these areas to a maximum
gradient of 10% (18- 4.12.17.a, policy).
26. Please provide a turn around for the alley behind lot 29 [DSM -604.B (4)].
27. Parking areas and access isles do not meet the minimum dimensions behind lots 59 -63, 140-
142 and 143 -148. Please correct this condition (18- 4.12.16.a.b &c, DSM- 602.1).
28. Please review the proposed grading and make corrections, for example, areas where
proposed contours do not tie into anything (lot 107), where proposed contours tie into homes
above first floor elevation (lot 2), unusual parking lot grade on Verona Court in front of lot
211, grade bust behind lots 30 -32.
B. Road and drainage plans:
1. Road plans were not provided with this submittal. Drainage computations were reviewed
with the site plan.
C. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan:
1. An amended stormwater management plan was submitted on May 22. Comments will be forth
coining.
D. Erosion Control Plan:
1. An erosion control plan was not included with this submittal.
Copy: file
File: El_rp GEB n.doc
COUNTY OF ALBE11 RLE Plai., ,,view Comments
Department of Engineering & rublic Works i
434) 296 -5861 Fax (434) 972 -4035 ' r
www.albemarle.orgrengineer
Project: Luxor, Amendment to SWM plan for Luxor & North Pantops Commercial
Plan preparer: Rivanna Engineering (fax 984 -8863)
Owner or rep.: Va. Land Co. (fax 296 -3510)
Plan received date: 22 May 2006
Date of comments: 12 July 2006
Reviewer: Mark Chambers
A. Stormwater management plan comments: ` (WPO- 2004 - 00011) ( Amenement)
1. Please move the emergency spillway to the east, off the embankment till section, and provide a
cross section detail (VSMH, Minimum Standard 3.03).
2. Please provide an exit channel for the spillway in accordance with VSMH, Minimum Standard
3.03
When comparing the amended "Hydrologic! Hydraulic Calculations" to the approved
calculations prepared by Rivanna Engineering & Surveying, revision date: July 1, 2005, we
found that the runoff coefficients for drainage areas 1 and 3 were reduced slightly and the
coefficient for drainage area 2 was unchanged. This is unexpected considering the reason for the
plan amendment is that the proposed type of development has become denser and the amount of
open space decreased since approval of the July 1, 2005 computations. Please provide more
information on how you arrived at the runoff coefficients and why the coefficients have
decreased instead of increased with the more intense development. We offer the following
additional comments:
a. The .3 runoff coefficients used for the drainage areas of the basins (labeled open space in
calculations) is not representative. These small areas are dominated by the basins and
any rain that falls directly into the basins will become part of the basins' hydraulics.
Additionally the slopes around the basins are generally steep reducing infiltration ability
of the soils;
b. The 3.3 acres of drainage area 3 in Ashcroft is considered woods and brush in the
amended calculations and was considered .5 acre lots in the approved computations;
C. The combined area of the 3 watersheds has decreased .65 acres in the amended
calculations, however, the boundaries of the drainage areas appear to be the same.
i. tL 1,
t r\ -. Att
l
RGP \
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012
December 4, 2006
Justin Shimp
2148 Berkmar Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: ARB- 2006 -121: Pavilions at Pantops, Phase 1 : Final Review of a Site Development Plan
Tax Map 078, Parcel 12)
Dear Mr. Shimp:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday,
November 20, 2006. The Board unanimously approved the certificate of appropriateness for ARB- 2006 -121,
Pavilions at Pantops, Phase 1, pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions:
1. Shift the London Plane tree out of the easement west of townhouse #1.
2. Revise the plan to clearly indicate all options chosen for the wall fixture: lamp type, wattage, finish,
etc. The lamp for the proposed fixture shall emit less than 3000 lumens.
3. Show the depth of the landscape easement along Rolkin Road on the plan. Ensure that the easement
and the plants in the easement do not conflict with other requirements.
4. Revise the covenants to include a clause stating that the Home Owner's Association will ensure that
no materials and /or colors other than those approved by the Albemarle County Architectural Review
Board shall be used for this project.
S. The elevations for townhouses 29 and 30 through 32 shall not be blank. Provide elevations for review.
6. Consider Oaks and Maples as replacements for the London Plane and White Ash trees.
7. Add the following note to the plan: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and
be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.
Please provide:
1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates
on each drawing.
2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other
than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes
in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
ARB 2006 -121 Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1
Page 2 of 2
December 4, 2006
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to
ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Design Planner
Planning Division
MMM /aer
Cc: Southern Development (Charlie Armstrong)
170 South Pantops Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22911
North Pantops Townhouses LLC
P O Box 8147, Charlottesville, VA 22906
File
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: The Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1
Plan preparer: The Engineering Groupe Inc. (fax (434) 973 -4584)
Owner or rep.: North Pantops Townhouses LLC (fax (434) 296 -3510)
Southern Development (fax 245-0895)
Plan received date: 02 May 2006
Rev. 1: 15 Nov 2006
Date of comments: 05 July 2006
Rev.]: 3 Jan 2006
Reviewer: Mark Chambers
Rev. 1: Glenn Brooks
A. Final site plan (SDP200600043)
I . The final set of drawings must have a signed and dated professional seal (18- 32.6.1).
Rev. 1: comment addressed
2. Please provide typical sections for proposed stormwater conveyance channels and
incorporate the channels into proposed topography on the plan view drawings (18-
32.6.6.d. I).
Rev. 1: comment not addressed.
3. Please provide a drainage summary table (18- 32.6.6.d.1 &2, DSM- 909. 1.B.D).
Rev. 1: comment addressed
4. Please dimension and label storm structures on the plan view drawing i.e. pipe length,
diameter, material, inlet type and rim or top elevation (18- 32.6.6.d.3, DSM- 909.1.13? 4 &7).
Rev. l: comment addressed.
5. Please provide a drainage easement over storm system P4 through P1 where it crosses
private property.
Rev.]: con7me77t pc7rtiully addressed. A deed and easement will have to he recorded prior to
or with approval offinal plats.
6. Please provide scour protection at the end of all pipe and channel outlets (DSM- 909.1.B.3,
505.C.6, 505.D.13).
Rev. 1: co77777ment partially addressed please p7'ol'7de o77tlet protection CI7777e77s7ons allcl ,specs
per outlet veloc
7. Please extend all pipe outlets to the bottom of slopes or provide an adequate channel to the
bottom of slopes [DSM- 803.1.0 and 505.0 (4)].
Rev. ]: comment not addressed
8. Please specify VDOT inlet shaping (IS -1) or provide manhole protection everywhere flow
drop is greater than 4" in manhole structures (DSM- 505.D.9).
Rev. l: comment addressed.
9. Please provide safety slabs for manholes greater than 10' deep (DSM- 505.D.9).
Rev.]: comment addressed.
10. For inlets in a sump condition, please provide capacity computations using I value of 6.5
in /hr (DSM- 505.G.1).
Rev. l: comment addressed.
11. Please provide capacity and velocity computations for proposed channels (DSM 505.C.1).
Albemarle County
a,
Engineering review comments
Page 2 of 3
Rev. 1: comment not acldressecl.
12. Pipe velocity for design flow must be less the 10 fps (DSM- 505.E.7).
Rev. 1: please disregard Outlet velocities must he designed per outlet protection.
13. Please review your pipe comps, in some instances flow accumulation (ACC "Q ") is not
adding up.
Rev.]: Pipe comps are in need of revision. Please ensure all pipes are within open channel
flow capacities.
14. Please provide comps for the existing storm system down stream of proposed structure 45 to
demonstrate adequacy of the existing system for the added flow.
Rev. l: as for item 13.
15. Please review your inlet comps, bypass from one inlet must be intercepted by another inlet.
An inlet in a sump cannot have bypass to an outlet as indicated in the comps (see inlet 40
bypass target is structure 39 which is an outlet), Inlets in a sump condition like 40 must pass
the flow from a "check storm" with an I value of 6.5 without overtopping the curb (see
comment #9). [DSM- 505.G. I]
Rev. l: comment addressed.
16. The following places need stormwater infrastructure to convey runoff:
a. East end of Wispering Hollow Lane;
b. The turn around at the end of Montessori Terrace;
c. The Corner of the parking lot in front of lot 161;
d. Please pipe the runoff from the parking area and travel way behind units
143 — 148;
e. The existing pipe outletting beside lot 1.
Rev. 1: comment d is not addressed.
17. The parking island in front of lot 205 doesn't provide for stormwater to pass through at the
curb line.
Rev. 1: comment adch•es.sed
18. Please address the unusual curb configurations along Verona Drive and Rolkin Road where
the curb tails out into the adjacent parcels.
Rev. 1: The splitter island fronn the roundabout should he continued, for at least 50', with a
break fior pedestrian access.
19. Please provide curb and gutter along the south end of Verona Court.
Rev. 1: comment addressed.
20. Guardrail is required at the end of Whispering Hollow Lane to prevent vehicles from going
over the retaining wall.
Rev. 1: comment partralh' addressed by note. Please revise the grading to allow adequate
space, and show the guardrail.
21. Please remove the curb separating the perpendicular parking from the street on the "Typical
Detail- Private Road with Parking" (sheet 3). Pavement design and other road requirements
will be reviewed with the road plan.
Rev. l: comment addressed
22. Please show the sanitary laterals and ensure they are covered by an appropriate easement.
Rev. 1: comment addressed.
23. Where public side walks cross private lots they need to be in access easements.
Rev. l: comment addressed
24. Please extend the public side walk in front of, and, add a lead walk to, unit 103.
Rev. 1: comment addressed.
25. Access isles, parking stalls alleys and roads exceed the maximum 10% gradient in the
following areas: (1) Behind units 52 -63; (ii) Wispering Hollow Lane near lot 149; (iii) Alley
off corner of lot 17; (iv) Alley north of lot 57. Please design these areas to a maximum
x _ Albemarle County
Engineering review comments
Page 3 of 3
gradient of 10% (18- 4.12.17.a, policy).
Rev. l: see road plans comments.
26. Please provide a turn around for the alley behind lot 29 [DSM -604.13 (4)].
Rev. 1: comment addressed.
27. Parking areas and access isles do not meet the minimum dimensions behind lots 59 -63, 140-
142 and 143 -148. Please correct this condition (18- 4.12.16.a.b &c, DSM - 602.1).
Rev. 1: comment addressed.
28. Please review the proposed grading and make corrections, for example, areas where
proposed contours do not tie into anything (lot 107), where proposed contours tie into homes
above first floor elevation (lot 2), unusual parking lot grade on Verona Court in front of lot
211, grade bust behind lots 30 -32.
Rev. 1: comment addressed
B. Road and drainage plans:
Road plans were not provided with this submittal. Drainage computations were reviewed with the
site plan.
Rev. 1: Road plans for private streets and alleys were included with the site plan revision, and the
following comments are provided
1. Please use the latest general notes f•oin the Design Standards Manual, or from the Expedited
Review Process lists.
2. Please provide dimensioned typical sections referenced to each street or alley.
3. Signs must be provided for each street intersection: stop signs and street name signs. Speed
limit signs should be on each street.
4. The waivers for 12% grade on Whispering Hollow are supported The waiver for a I2%
grade can be supported on Verona Court ifparking is removed along this section of road
5. The sag curve 017 Verona Court does not meet minimum standards.
6 The sag curve on Whispering Hollow does not meet minimum standards.
7. On Whispering Hollow the road vertical curvature needs to transition into a negative 2%
grade off Rolkin Road
S. Please show cross- drains and underdrains where required per VDOT standards on the plan
and profile.
C. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan: (WP0200400011)
An amended stormwater management plan was submitted on May 22. Comments will be forth coming.
Rev. 1: The stormwater plan amendment has been approved, and the updated igfortnation and
grading should appear on this plan.
D. Erosion Control Plan:
An erosion control plan was not included with this submittal.
Rev. l: rn1 erosion control plan has not been received
1fi1 III l
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
Project: The Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1
Plan preparer: The Engineering Groupe Inc. (fax (434) 973 -4584)
Owner or rep.: North Pantops Townhouses LLC (fax (434) 296 -3510)
Southern Development (fax 245 -0895)
Plan received date: 02 May 2006
Rev.]: 15 Nov 2006
Rev.2: 19 March 2007
Date of comments: 05 July 2006
Rev. 1: 3 Jan 2006
Rev.2. 24 March 2007
Reviewer: Mark Chambers
Rev.]: Glenn Brooks
Rev. 2: Max Greene
Fax (434) 972 -4126
The final site plan for "The Pavilions at Pantops Phase I" submitted 19 April 2007 have received
engineering review. VDOT has approved the site plan as submitted. Several previous
engineering comments do not appear adequately addressed, they are in bold italics below. The
E &SC plan package has been received separately and will be reviewed for State and local
compliance. Bond amounts will be compiled after all departments and agencies have submitted
notice of approval.
A. Final site plan (SDP200600043)
I . The final set of drawings must have a signed and dated professional seal (18- 32.6.1).
Rev.1: comment addressed.
2. Please provide typical sections for proposed stormwater conveyance channels and
incorporate the channels into proposed topography on the plan view drawings (18-
32.6.6.d.1).
O Rev. l: comment not addressed.
Rev. 2: comment addressed.
3. Please provide a drainage sunvnary table (18- 32.6.6.d.1 &2, DSM- 909.1.B.D).
Rev. I. comment addressed.
4. Please dimension and label storm structures on the plan view drawing i.e. pipe length,
diameter, material, inlet type and rim or top elevation (18- 32.6.6.d.3, DSM- 909.1.B.2 4 &7).
Rev. ]. comment addressed.
5. Please provide a drainage easement over storm system P4 through P 1 where it crosses
private property.
k' Rev.I. commientpartially addressed. A deed and easement will have to he recorded 1n °ioi to
or with approval offinal plats.
Rev. 2: comment addressed.
6. Please provide scour protection at the end of all pipe and channel outlets (DSM- 909.1.B.3,
505.C.6, 505.D.13).
3( Rev. I. comment partially adch Please provide outlet protection dimensions and specs
Albemarle County
Engineering review comments
Page 2 of 4
Per outlet velocities.
Rev.2: comment adch- cssed.
7. Please extend all pipe outlets to the bottom of slopes or provide an adequate channel to the
bottom of slopes [DSM- 803.1.0 and 505.0 (4)].
XRev. l: comment not addressed.
ti Rev. 2: continent addressed.
8. Please specify VDOT inlet shaping (IS -1) or provide manhole protection everywhere flow
drop is greater than 4' in manhole structures (DSM- 505.D.9).
Rev. l: comment addressed.
9 Please provide safety slabs for manholes greater than 10' deep (DSM- 505.D.9).
Rev. l: comment addressed.
10. For inlets in a sump condition, please provide capacity computations using I value of 6.5
in/hr (DSM 505.G.1).
Rev. l: comment addressed.
11. Please provide capacity and velocity computations for proposed channels (DSM 505.C.1).
Rev. 1: continent not addresse(l
vRev.2: comment addressed.
12. Pipe velocity for design flow must be less the 10 fps (DSM- 505.E.7).
Rev. l: please disregard. Outlet velocities must he designed per outlet protection.
13. Please review your pipe comps, in some instances flow accumulation (ACC "Q ") is not
adding up.
Rev. 1: Pipe comps are in need oJfrevision. Please ensure till pipes are within open channel
jlotir capacities.
Rev. 2: comment addressed.
14. Please provide comps for the existing storm system down stream of proposed structure 45 to
demonstrate adequacy of the existing system for the added flow.
NRev. l: as for item 13.
Rev. 2. continent ad&
15. Please review your inlet comps, bypass from one inlet must be intercepted by another inlet.
An inlet in a sump cannot have bypass to an outlet as indicated in the comps (see inlet 40
bypass target is structure 39 which is an outlet), Inlets in a sump condition like 40 must pass
the flow from a "check storm" with an I value of 6.5 without overtopping the curb (see
comment #9). [DSM- 505.G.1 I
Rev. l: comment addressed.
16. The following places need stormwater infrastructure to convey runoff:
a. East end of Wispering Hollow Lane;
b. The turn around at the end of Montessori Terrace;
c. The Corner of the parking lot in front of lot 161;
Od- Please pipe the runoff frorn the parking area and travel way behind units
143 — 148;
e. The existing pipe outletting beside lot 1.
Rev. l: comment d is not addressed.
Rev.2: comment "d" not adequately addressed, County policy requires yard drains
after the 3 " lot of continuous drainage across proposed private property. Grading
was suggested during the last meeting to alleviate this concern, but was not shown.
17. The parking island in front of lot 205 doesn't provide for stormwater to pass through at the
curb line.
t Rev. l: comment addressed.
S. Please address the unusual curb configurations along Verona Drive and Rolkin Road where
Albemarle County
Engineering review comments
Page 3 of 4
the curb tails out into the adjacent parcels.
Rev. l: The splitter island,fr °orrn the roundabout should be continued . fin- at least 50', with a
break f n pedestrian access.
Rev. 2: comment addressed.
19. Please provide curb and gutter along the south end of Verona Court.
Rev. l: comment adth °cssed.
20. Guardrail is required at the end of Whispering Hollow Lane to prevent vehicles from going
over the retaining wall.
Oev. l: connnent partially addressed by note. Please revise the grading to allow adequate
space, and show guardrail.
Rev?: connnent addressed.
21. Please remove the curb separating the perpendicular parking from the street on the "Typical
Detail- Private Road with Parking" (sheet 3). Pavement design and other road requirements
will be reviewed with the road plan.
ti Rev. l: connnent adthessed.
2 Please show the sanitary laterals and ensure they are covered by an appropriate easement.
Rev. l: connnent addressed.
23. Where public side walks cross private lots they need to be in access easements.
Rev. 1: comment addressed.
24. Please extend the public side walk in front of, and, add a lead walk to, unit 103.
Rev. l: connnent addressed.
25. Access isles, parking stalls alleys and roads exceed the maximum 10% gradient in the
following areas: (i) Behind units 52 -63; (ii) Wispering Hollow Lane near lot 149; (iii) Alley
off corner of lot 17; (iv) Alley north of lot 57. Please design these areas to a maximum
gradient of 10% (18- 4.12.17.a, policy).
X Rev. ]:see road plans conan nts.
N Rev. 2: comment addressed.
26. Please provide a turn around for the alley behind lot 29 [DSM -604.13 (4)].
4 Rev. 1: connnent addressed.
27. Parking areas and access isles do not meet the minimum dimensions behind lots 59 -63, 140-
142 and 143 -148. Please correct this condition (18 4.12.16.a.b &c, DSM 602.1).
Rev. 1: conment addres's'ed.
28. Please review the proposed grading and make corrections, for example, areas where
proposed contours do not tie into anything (lot 107), where proposed contours tie into homes
above first floor elevation (lot 2), unusual parking lot grade on Verona Court in front of lot
211, grade bust behind lots 30 -32.
Rev. l: connnent addressed.
B. Road and drainage plans:
Road plans were not provided with this submittal. Drainage computations were reviewed with the
site plan.
Rev.]: Road plans_ for private streets and alleys were included with the site plan revision, and the
following comments are provided.
1. Please use the latest general notes, f •onn the Design Standards Mamunl, or, fi•orn the Expedited
Review Process lists.
Rev. 2: connnent addressed.
2. Please provide dimensioned tvpical Sections referenced to each street or alley.
Rev. 2: comment addressed.
3. Signs must be provided each street intersection: stop signs and street name signs. Speed
1a >HCINP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012
April 4, 2007
Justin Shimp
The Engineering Groupe, Inc.
2148 Berkinar Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: ARB- 2006 -121: Pavilions at Pantops, Phase 1 : Final Review of a Site Development Plan
Tax Map 078, Parcel 12)
Dear Mr. Shimp:
I have reviewed your revised submittal (Site plan sheets 1 -38 with revision date of 3/28/07) for the above -
referenced project. Outstanding conditions of ARB approval are as follows:
1. Shift the London Plane tree out of the easement west of townhouse # 1. (Your memo indicated that the tree
was shitted, but our records show that it has not moved. I have attached a copy of your plan with the tree
highlighted.)
2. Revise the covenants to include a clause stating that the Home Owner's Association will ensure that no
materials and /or colors other than those approved by the Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
shall be used for this project.
3. The elevations for townhomes 29 and 30 through 32 shall not be blank. Provide elevations for review.
Please provide:
1. Two copies of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates
on each drawing.
2. A memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been
made, identify those changes in the memo also.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to
ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staff s review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Principal Planner
cc: ARB -06 -121 Summer Frederick
t;)p 2_0D r
t ,
Service Auth4ri
Mr. Michael Myers, P.E.
The Engineering Groupe
2148 Berkmar Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Re: Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1
Dear Mr. Myers.
September 19, 2007
The plan, entitled "Pavilions at Pantops Phase 1" dated April 17, 2006, last revised
July 31, 2007 is hereby approved for construction. One set of the approved plan is
enclosed for your records. Any previously approved plans are voided with this approval.
This approval is for basic compliance with the General Water & Sewer Construction
Specifications of the Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) and does not relieve the
contractor from responsibility for his work as it relates to the plan and specifications.
The ACSA requires that a copy of the approved construction plan be on the job
site. The contractor is responsible for marking up a copy of the approved construction
plan, showing as -built information and providing this data to your client at the completion
of utility installation. The final as -built plan shall be submitted in a format of one paper
copy and one mylar copy.
A preconstruction conference shall be scheduled with the project manager to
ensure coordination and answer any questions. This will be a short meeting to review the
project, materials, test methods and schedule, in order to expedite construction. Please
have the proper party call me at 977 -4511 to schedule the meeting.
This approval is valid for a period of 18 months from this date. If construction is
not in progress at the end of this time period, the approval shall be void. The pressure for
water may be less than 30 psi at some meter locations. If you have any questions, or if
we can be of assistance, please give us a call at (434) 977 -4511.
JML-cc: Charles Armstrong
State Health Department
Planning Department
Bldg Codes & Zoning Services
Soil Erosion Inspector
050601 PavilionsMyersLV091907
Sincerely,
Jeremy M. Lynn, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville, VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698
www.serviceauthority.org
RIVANNA WATER SEWER AUTHORITY
695 M C;ORES CREEK LA NE .CHAR! OTT ESV ILLS.I PG I N I A 22 901
S177-2970 FAX •134; ?'+i PE-E5 • WEBSITIF RIVANNA OR(,
HIC i,111.\ti llflCd 1 111-11 Ili- 1 1:1 1 1 iIC PJ\ 111!1)11, .11 t :1!t.
hlcd 's 1 0- itilil " t , I I - k 1 1! 11 . 1)7 NI I I L1, dill tfic hl, 111Vd 1<\x J
ot IlIc plop""L 1 1)
11: ,t:d o! 1, v. i !!I the pl 0 ) Cd R W l A 1, 1' Ili if 'fit 01:11 11,1111 111 01C J1 W Ili "JI.-th I'i,
IZV, IN tit Ic-L:I :1 vXI"Ill)"
t tc.), I ;I i - d ):h 11 C't I if I! 1l- C.1 IL'IIIL 111, III UJI111 {ht , It( I 1 , IilllC,l t•') It`. !1;!111, tt1 ILIC,,,
Opi.:l•it 1. ill. it cil I IIL:11:pi;:c iwd I Cj 1 .ti I td it, f ' 111 it: N 11111!1 if ,I:( 11
tl,rl,t ,hall it q he "i'll '! 1 IIC, i to ljlc d11\ c I III oll\ \\,I\ islIN, U
tLP:!il wd All I LIIIIIC l,:0II'I1tIL'Ii0[I (it jlL'
nd p:opo K%V' d)all 1 IIIIIII. mode h , filollibif ml
11441 fhl,' i" (101 (it its ;Ilo,. 1•
1cp;!if ,, li, -1
111;1! 1!:L7 pr( 18 hilt. t , 11 11 t 11 ill', plaw, P, 1111 mldc!
1 111' I i:\IlC 10 !hL J;Z 11111L
Dj1iI:I!;1Lvd h" P\\P;101 10 Ili N\011,1 I 111. ,il
L\1'111W di'll I`illlt'i: I
I" ACCCIll '];'I
Tcf il''il
1 .;I,1 t1 1—\'. : , , j I I, ' 't- „I , , !I I!: i c I o , p I '. . , - ', 1 11,'1 !'-, - I ' It k I. , _, : ; I ,
I i 1, L I l 1 " .
rl 2007