The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200600064 Review Comments 2006-12-05r+y,,9 'Pr , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE G IT2, Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project:Hollymead Town Center, Block 3, Lot A, Rosewood Plan preparer:W.W. Associates [fax 978 -1444] Owner or rep.:Rosewood Village [fax 975 -9079] Shareef Tahboub [fax 975 -5777] Plan received date: 30 Nov 2006 Date of comments: 05 Dec 2006 Reviewer:Jonathan Sharp All of the Engineering comments have been addressed for Hollymead Town Center Block 3 Lot A. The E &S bond needs to be posted. A. Final Site Plan and Drainage Plans (SDP200600064) All of the Final Site Plan comments have been addressed. B. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600047) The E &S plan will be approved once the Final Site Plan is approved and the E &S bond is posted. The bond is set at $21,000. jM• m 4W, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project:Hollymead Town Center, Block 3, Lot A, Rosewood Plan preparer:W.W. Associates [fax 978 -1444] Owner or rep.:Rosewood Village[fax 975 -9079] Plan received date: 27 Jun 2006 Date of comments: 11 Aug 2006 Reviewer:Joint review A. Road and drainage plans (SDP200600064) 1. VDOT approval is required. 2. The roads and drainage systems serving this development must be approved. 3. Off -site easements must be provided. 4. Stormsewer does not appear to be designed according to Design Manual section 505. For example, pipe angles must be 90 degrees or greater. 5. Please provide curbing at the edge of the perimeter travelway, or include the later phases. 6. It appears D -3 will not catch much drainage. 7. See Zoning Ordinance section 4.12. Sidewalk must be 6' wide in front of parking. 8. Grades for parking areas and travelways for parking areas must not exceed 5 %. 9. Changes to surrounding roads and drainage, as well as this site, may necessitate further comments upon revision. C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600047) 1. Construction entrance must be to an existing road, Timberwood Blvd. 2. The site northeast of the current entrance location is not adequately protected. It also appears to rely on road construction not approved and not tied to this site plans. 3. Phasing appears to be required. The silt traps (D -2, D -4) appears to be under or over proposed grading, and must be perimeter measures to function correctly. 4. No specifications or computations were found for D -1 or D -3. 5. Inlet protection must be shown for all inlets. 6. The diversion dike to right -of -way diversion does not appear workable as shown currently. The new construction entrance location may be more practical. 7. A complete review of computations and areas was not possible, and further comments may be necessary upon revision. llY :17 .1 ;4 , 1 J COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project:Hollymead Town Center, Block 3, Lot A, Rosewood Plan preparer:W.W. Associates [fax 978 -1444] Owner or rep.:Rosewood Village [fax 975 -9079] Plan received date: 27 Jun 2006 29 Aug 2006 (Revl ) Date of comments: 11 Aug 2006 27 Sep (Revl) Reviewer:Joint review, Jonathan Sharp (Revl ) For our files, we will need 4 copies of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and 1 copy of the Final Site plans. (If VDOT approves your plans submitted on the 29 of August, send us 4 more copies of the plans. If they require changes, send 5 copies of the revised plans.) We can let you know once we hear back from VDOT and whether they approve the plans or require changes. A. Final Site Plan and Drainage Plans (SDP200600064) 1. VDOT approval is required. Revl: The plans you submitted 6/26/06 were distributed to VDOT, and the two VDOT comments at end of the response letter you sent us are the VDOT comments from those plans. I have sent VDOT the revised set ofyour plans, along with a copy ofyour responses and single truck diagram for approval. 2. Off -site easements must be provided. Revl: We received your letter of intent for the easements needed but have lost or misplaced it. Can you please send us another copy? Thanks, and we apologize for misplacing it. B. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200600047) The E &S plan will be approved once the Final Site Plan is approved and the E &S bond is posted. The bond is set at $21,000. Ste p 14,01S VI WPo oe V 1) OT tipr i t t q/l see e.c4. SC Awn + f 5 v e. 3 G e 0, 44 c h rtW v.04 - r irtc;m`-anott COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development401McIntireRoad, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Fax (434 972 -4126 Phone 434)29b - 5832 Project:Hollymead Town Center, Block 3, Lot A, Rosewood Plan preparers W.W. Associates [fax 978 -1444] Owner or rep.:Rosewood Village [fax 975 -907 Plan received date: 27 Jun 2006 29 Aug 2006 (Revl) 30 Oct 2006 (Rev2) Date of comments: 11 Aug 2006 27 Sep (Rev 1) 13 Nov (Rev2) Reviewer:Jonathan Sharp Once all comments are addressed, we will need 4 copies of the Erosion and Sediment Control plans for our files.A. Final Site Plan and Drainage Plans (SDP2006000 3. Several of the proposed trees are located on top of where fixture storm sewers are proposed: t Cr 1 :114.),_ 7 i ---- 6477, 1 1:).- '-'-' .- ' - .---- I 4 5)FL j ' i B. Erosion Control Plan (WP0o006 00047)41 Site Plan is approved and the E &S bond is posted. ThencetheTheE &S plan will be approved bond is set at $21,000. SDP -2006 -00064 Hollymead Towncenter Area C block 3 file: / / / / /Cob- dtsO1iCityViewLnk /Does /2006 %20Applications /2006... From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .Denunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1 1:45 AM To: David E. Pennock Cc: Allan Schuck; Glenn Brooks Subject: SDP - 2006 -00064 Hollymead Towncenter Area C block 3 SDP - 2006 -00064 Hollymead Towncenter Area C block 3 David, We have reviewed the above project and have no additional comments. Thanks, Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 joel.denunzio @VirginiaDOT.org 1 of 1 9/28/2006 3:38 PM llF NT 1r 0 .7,„ r,,K;i, County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:John Winn, VDOT From:Jonathan Sharp, Albemarle County Engineering Date:26 Sep 2006 Subject: Hollymead Town Center, Block 3, Lot A (Rosewood) Attached is copy of the responses to your comments for Rosewood from 8/11, a diagram sheet for a single unit truck turning, and a copy of the revised plans. O N q fittgrraft N COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45% Phone (43d) 2965832 Fn (434) 412.4126 Project:Ilollymead Town Center, Block 3, Lot A, Rosewood Plan preparer:W.W. Associates [fax 978 -1444 j Owner or rep.:Rosewood VilIage[fax 975 -9079J Plan received date: 27 Jun 2006 Date of comments: 11 Aug 2006 Reviewer John review A. Road and drainage plans (SDP200600064) 1. VDOT approval is required. 2. The roads and drainage systems serving this development must be approved. 3. Off -site easements must be provided. 4. Stormscwer does not appear to be designed according to Design Manual section 505. For example, pipe angles must be 90 degrees or Beater. 5. Please provide curbing at the edge of the perimeter travelway, or include the later phases. 6. It appears D -3 will not catch much drainage. 7. See Zoning Ordinance section 4.12. Sidewalk must be 6' wide in front of parking. 8. Grades for parking areas and travelways for parking areas must not exceed 5 °10. 9. Changes to surrounding roads and drainage, as well as this site, may necessitate further comments upon revision. C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600047) 1. Construction entrance must be to an existing road, Timberwood Blvd. 2. The site northeast of the current entrance location is not adequately protected. It also appears to rely on road construction not approved and not tied to this site plans. 3. Phasing appears to be required, The silt traps (D - D appears to be under or over proposed grading, and mast be perimeter measures to function correctly. 4. No specifications or computations were found for D -1 or D -3. 5. Inlet protection must be shown for all inlets. 6. The diversion dike to right - - way diversion does not appear workable as shown currently. The new construction entrance location may be more practical. 7. A complete review of computations and areas was not possible, and further comments may be necessary upon revision.