The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200600084 Review Comments 2006-10-03OFAL3, IHGIyI County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Todd Harkins From: Francis H. MacCall, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:10/3/06 Subject: SDP 2006 - 0084 Hollymead Towncenter Area C Block 1 Bob Evans Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will approve the final site plan when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle.] I understand your response to my comments so these are the 3 items left to do that you stated would be forthcoming. As soon as I can review and approve those items I will be OK with the plan. There are still others that need to be satisfied. 1. With the recent subdivision of the property the plan now shows offsite improvements for this plan to work. Please provide a written agreement that you are permitted to do this construction on the other parcel. This will pertain to the parking as well (see below) 2. 4.12.8 e] With the construction and eventual use of these spaces by Bob Evans there will need to be a shared parking agreement between parcels 41D4 and 41D5. 3. The final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Copy: SDP - 2006 -0084 Y 1 111 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Todd Harkins From: Francis H. MacCall, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:8/4/06 Subject: SDP - 2006 - 0084 Hollymead Towncenter Area C Block 1 Bob Evans Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will approve the final site plan when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Code of Albemarle.] 1. With the recent subdivision of the property the plan now shows offsite improvements for this plan to work. Please provide a written agreement that you are permitted to do this construction on the other parcel. This will pertain to the parking as well (see below) 2. 4.12] The numbers for the parking are a little off The front page sates that there are Approx" 38 employees but on sheet 2 it states that there are 21 MAX. The front sheet notes that there are 56 spaces provided. I have counted 57 spaces please verify and note that they are onsite. On sheet 2 under the heading BOB EVANS RESTAURANT PARKING REQUIREMENTS it notes 21 max employees (see above). Also, breakdown the number of spaces to onsite and offsite. Again it appears that there are 57 spaces onsite and 21 spaces offsite (meaning not on parcel 41D4) for a total of 78 spaces not 70. Show like this Bob Evans Restaurant .... Bob Evans Restaurant .... 4.5 spaces... 3 Handicap ... 3 Handicap ... 24 Total Spaces Required 57 spaces provided onsite 21 spaces provided offsite 78 Total Spaces Provided 3. 4.12.8 e] With the construction and eventual use of these spaces by Bob Evans there will need to be a shared parking agreement between parcels 41 D4 and 41D5. 4. 32.7.9] Note that the landscape plan on page 11 is the required landscape plan and that the one on page 12 is for reference only. I think this was ARB requesting this if so then note that. 5. 32.7.9] In the schedule the number for COB is 2 but the plan shows only 1. Please correct. 6. The site plan on sheet 2 shows lights in different locations than what is on the photometric plan on sheet 14. Please correct. 7. The final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Copy: SDP- 2006 -0084 O COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 August 3, 2006 Bob Anderson, AIA Lina Bozzelli 111 West High Street MS Consultants, Inc. Charlottesville, VA 22902 2221 Schrock Road Columbus, Ohio 43229 -1547 RE: ARB- 2006 -05: Bob Evans Dear Mr. Anderson and Ms. Bozzelli: I have reviewed the submittal for the above - referenced project, which consisted of the following items: Color elevations dated March 20, 2006 Architectural sheets A2.0, A2.1, A83 dated July 28, 2005 Site plan dated 2/13/06 with lighting plan dated 9/26/05 Your submittal did not address all conditions of ARB approval. These are the outstanding items: 1. Provide a warmer color of mortar for review. (Your drawing indicates "natural gray" mortar is proposed. A sample is required for review.) 2. Provide complete and accurate grading related to the retaining wall and overall site. Coordinate grading with the HTC basin plan. (Your memo indicates that this would be addressed in the future.) 3. Coordinate all drawings related to the retaining wall. Reduce the retaining wall height or step the wall. Additional recommendations may result from the work session. (Your memo indicates that this would be addressed in the future.) 4. Provide a detail of the head wall condition. (Your memo indicates that this would be addressed in the future.) 5. Revise the Plant List to show the Red Maples along the EC at 3 /2 caliper. (Your memo indicated that this was done, but the landscape schedule I have for review still says 21/4" caliper.) 6. Clearly show on the plan that proposed plants are not located in easements or provide documentation that the easement holders do not object to the proposed planting. (A red maple is located in the sanitary easement. Red maples on the west side of the site are in an easement; please clarify on the drawing which easement it is.) 7. Remove the notes that refer to rafter lights and wall can lights from the elevation drawings. Include the wall fixtures in the luminaire schedule. Identify wall light color in the schedule. Include fixture cut sheets on the photometric plan; provide the cut sheets for review. Identify all lighting options chosen, including lamp type, wattage, finish, etc. Revise the photometric plan to show that spillover does not exceed .5 footcandles at the property line along the EC. (Your memo indicates that these changes are yet to be made.) 8. Include dimensions on the sign drawings showing a minimum of 4" above and below the channel letters, within the sign band. Revise the sign drawings to identify the raceway color as matching the color of the brick wall. Indicate on the sign drawing that the blue background of the cabinet sign is opaque. Revise the sign drawings to identify the raceway color as matching the color of the brick wall. Indicat( eway height. Revise the red #2283 to re(' 793. (Your memo indicated that this would be addressed later.) 9. Additional recommendations regarding patio integration, the retaining wall, and planting may result from the work session. (The follow -up work session on the HTC basin has not yet been held. Coordination is still required.) 10. The beam shall extend to the ends of the piers. (The beam is shown extended to the end of only one pier.) 11. Coordinate the side elevations to align the cornice heights with the front and rear elevations. (The cornice heights on the elevation submitted for review do not appear to have changed since the last submittal. Please explain what change was made.) Please provide: 1. Two copies of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions, including any relevant information resulting from work sessions regarding the retaining wall. 2. A memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. 3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret M. Maliszewski Principal Planner Cc: Post Office Land Trust; Charles Wm Hurt & Shirley L Fisher Trustees, POB 8147, Cville, VA 22906 ARB File