HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600023 Staff Report 2016-03-28ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB -2016-23: BJ's Restaurant
Review Type
Amendment to an Approved Certificate of Appropriateness
Parcel Identification
061WO0300019AO
Location
On the west side of Rt. 29, approximately 400' south of Lenox Avenue and just north of Sperry/Northrup Grumman
Zoned
Neighborhood Model (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Albemarle Place EAAP LLC/Jared Taylor
Magisterial District
Jack Jouett
Proposal
To revise the ARB -approved design of Building G2 in the Stonefield Town Center to accommodate a BJ's restaurant.
Context
The site is located in the northern section (Block G) of the Stonefield Town Center, just north of Sperry/Northrup Grumman and east of Costco.
Visibility
The north, south and east elevations of the building will be readily visible from the Entrance Corridor.
ARB Meeting Date
April 1, 2016
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
The ARB completed a review of the BJ's proposal to revise the design of Building G2 on February 1, 2016. The action letter from that meeting is included as Attachment A to this report and the
comments made at the meeting are included in the Analysis table, below. Staff discussed the ARB comments and resubmittal requirements with the applicant on February 17, 2016. An application to
revise the architectural design of Building G1 (the building to be located to the north) to accommodate a Jared jewelry store was reviewed by the ARB on February 16 and March 7, 2016. Revisions to
address ARB comments on the Jared proposal will be reviewed by the ARB at an upcoming meeting.
F.Mr:1 W&I KI
REF
GUIDELINE
2/1/2016 COMMENT CURRENT ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the
1.Revise the exterior materials Proposed building materials have been
Provide for review the
designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the
selection and colors to relate more revised. The white CMU previously
material/color samples
corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
consistently with the existing context proposed for the service area screen wall
for the lightened wood
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed
established throughout the Stonefield has been revised to tan block. The tan is an
stain, the tile, block and
development within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of
development. earthier tone which is better coordinated
paint.
design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and
with the other proposed building colors.
structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly
2.Eliminate the murals from the Paint for the stucco, doors, gate and utility
Revise the drawings to
and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants should note
proposal. Replace the murals with panels has been revised from elder white
include details for the
that replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired.
architectural detailing to relieve SW 7014 to Mega Greige SW 7031. The
blankness. material for the water table has been
trellis and wood
slat/metal tube decorative
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and
revised from white CMU to Daltile
frames.
vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
Diamante Grigio P021 (black). The
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to
applicant has indicated that the wood
four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area;
cladding color has been lightened, but the
the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
name of the material has not changed on
landscaping.
the drawings. The brick has been revised to
use just one of the previously proposed
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should
respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings
colors — rawhide — and the pilasters have
in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings
been revised to include continuous brick to
in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide
the ground to relate more closely to the
important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
previously approved Stonefield designs.
Black canopies are still proposed on the
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
north and east elevations. Black is one of
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
the approved colors for awnings in the
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
shopping center. Samples for the new
area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
materials/colors have not been submitted.
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which
may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
Exterior murals have been eliminated. The
traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate
mural on the front elevation has been
varying tastes as well as special functional requirements.
replaced with a trellis whose appearance is
similar in design to that used in Phase 1 of
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials,
colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the
the Stonefield development. A detail of the
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
trellis is not included in the submittal. The
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The
mural on the rear elevation has been
standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms
replaced with a wood slat and steel tube
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
decorative framework in two options. One
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County
places the framework in each of the three
is not the objective of these guidelines.
brick surrounds at the west end of the rear
elevation. The other option leaves the areas
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in
within the brick surrounds free of detailing.
order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate
Landscaping is proposed along the wall in
sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a
this area. A detail of the wood slat/metal
designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require
tube framework is not included in the
striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the
submittal.
existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the
significant historic sites in the area.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of
buildings.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms,
shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be
1.Revise the exterior materials
The 3'3" -tall water table, the use of brick,
None.
integral to the building and site design.
selection and colors to relate more
divided windows on the north and east
consistently with the existing context
elevations, and breaking the building down
established throughout the Stonefield
into bays helps establish a human scale.
development.
The addition of the trellis and wood
slat/metal tube decorative frames helps
2.Eliminate the murals from the
eliminate blankness and establish scale.
proposal. Replace the murals with
architectural detailing to relieve
blankness.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be
2)Eliminate the murals from the
The murals have been replaced with a
See comments above.
relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
proposal. Replace the murals with
trellis and decorative frames of wood slats
architectural detailing to relieve
and metal tubes. (See above for additional
blankness.
information.)
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
2.Eliminate the murals from the
BFs restaurant buildings typically follow a
See comments above.
requirements of the Guidelines.
proposal. Replace the murals with
standard design. The current proposal
architectural detailing to relieve
includes changes to the standard trademark
blankness.
design, including changes to materials and
colors and the elimination of the murals
from the exterior of the building.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be
None.
No physical connecting devices were
See comments above.
used to unify groups of buildings within a development.
previously proposed or approved for
buildings in this block and none are
proposed now. With the original approval,
buildings in Block G were unified by
color, material, forms and details. The
consistency of that design is gradually
being diminished with the proposals for
BJ's, Jared, Qdoba (a future proposal in
G4), and Mission BBQ (a future proposal
in G3), and the introduction of additional
future tenants could continue this trend.
BJ's and Jared (G2 and G1) have the most
visibility in the block and will appear to
have the most individuality in design, but
between them, building forms, scale,
materials and color tones are expected to
appear compatible.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
3)Add the standard window glass note
The note has been added. In addition to
None.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the
to the drawings.
vision glass, spandrel glass is proposed
following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below
above doors on the north and east
40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications
elevations. The amount is minor and is not
on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for
expected to have a negative impact on the
final review.
EC.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall
4)Coordinate all site, grading, utility,
A revised site plan is included in this
None.
plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with
landscape and lighting drawings with
submittal. It shows a service yard with
the building designs used on the site.
the new restaurant layout and the
service yard.
loading area on the west side of the
building. The service area is enclosed by a
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
CMU wall. The white block originally
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be
5)Revise the size and/or location of
proposed for the wall has been revised to
provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse
rooftop mechanical equipment to
tan block, which coordinates better with
areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground utilities,
eliminate visibility from the Entrance
the other building materials and will have a
and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security
Corridor.
more appropriate appearance for the EC.
fencing devices.
The elevations show rooftop equipment
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings
and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b.
extending above the parapet walls. Site
Plantings, and c. Fencing.
sections have been provided to assess
visibility of the equipment from the EC.
The information suggests that the
equipment won't be visible, but it would
be helpful to have the applicant explain
their findings in detail at the ARB meeting.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into
None.
No major changes to stormwater facilities
None.
the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the
are proposed.
Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the
landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
6)Add the standard mechanical
The note appears on the cover sheet of the
Add the standard
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
equipment note to the drawings.
site plan but it was not added to the
mechanical equipment
eliminated."
architectural drawings.
note to the architectural
drawings.
Lighting
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent
7)Eliminate all exterior LED strip
The previously approved photometric plan
Revise the photometric
properties or streets;
lighting from the building cornices.
for Block G and a new photometric plan
for BJ's have been included in this
plan to show the location
of exterior building -
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All
fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff
8)Include all building -mounted lights
submittal, as well as a complete fixture
mounted lights and to
fixtures.
in the photometric calculations.
schedule for the building. The photometric
plans show different illumination levels.
include the illumination
of those lights in the
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in
the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in
9)Clarify on the drawings the
The footcandle readings on the BJ's
footcandle readings on
the Entrance Corridors.
illumination intended for the murals.
Provide additional information to
photometric plan do not extend to the
property line, and the illumination from all
the plan.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow;
however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is
clarify the night-time appearance of
building -mounted lights still does not
Clarify the nighttime
required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non-white light are to
the murals.
appear to be accounted for in the plan.
appearance of the trellis.
remain, new lamps may be required to match them.
10)Limit wall lights to down lights
Light levels reach a maximum of 16.1 fc
on the BJ's plan.
Indicate how bright the
linear LED lighting will
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing
pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
only.
The murals and the associated LED
be on the wall and trellis.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be
compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are
11)Clarify the location and appearance
cornice strip lighting have been removed
Show on the elevations
illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of
of the recessed mirror light (reference
from the plan. 4' linear LED fixtures are
the locations of the arm
freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should
note #12 on the elevation sheets).
proposed above the trellis on the front
mount bowl light fixture.
not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height
elevation. The recessed mirror light note
If it is not proposed,
will typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate
12)Show on the elevations the
has been revised to reference the recessed
eliminate it from the
appearance from the Entrance Corridor.
locations of the arm mount bowl light
fixture.
trellis light. Lights are proposed under the
steel canopies located over the entrances.
fixture schedule.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance
Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration
Up -lights are shown mounted on some of
on a case by case basis.
the canopies on the elevation drawings but
they don't appear in the electrical plan or
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens
the photometric plan. The light fixture
shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect
schedule still includes an "exterior canopy
light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent
wall arm mount bowl fixture" that does not
roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and
appear on the elevations. Two LED wall
property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one
wash fixtures (LS 1 and LS2) are included
half footcandle."
in the lamp schedule but they don't appear
on the plan. The intensity of the
30
light used for decorative effect shall:
a. be compatible with the character of the Entrance Corridor. Compatibility
illumination from the various wall fixtures
of exterior lighting and lighting fixtures is assessed in terms of design, use,
should be included in the photometric plan
size, scale, color, and brightness.
for a clear understanding of the nighttime
b. impact only the immediate site. The effect of the illumination should not
appearance of the building.
be discernible from distances along the Entrance Corridor.
31
Where used for decorative effect, outdoor light fixtures shall:
a. be equipped with automatic timing devices and shall be extinguished
between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and dawn.
b. be shielded and focused to eliminate glare. Glare control shall be
achieved primarily through the use of such means as cutoff fixtures, shields
and baffles, and appropriate application of mounting height, wattage,
aiming angle, fixture placement, etc.
c. be cutoff luminaires, aimed so as not to project their output beyond the
objects intended to be illuminated; or non -cutoff luminaires, equipped with
glare shields, visors, barn doors, and/or other similar shielding accessories
as required to meet the following criteria: Light distribution from all
lighting installations shall be cut-off at all angles beyond those required to
restrict direct illumination to within the perimeter of the landscape feature
being illuminated.
d. never exceed 3,000 lumens. Further restrictions on lumens may be
imposed by the ARB.
e. not be modified to reflect seasonal colors.
f. be of a number that is compatible with the scale of the object and the
development to be illuminated, such that the light emitted will not over -
illuminate or overpower the site, as determined by the ARB.
Landscaping
13)Submit a revised landscape plan
A revised landscape plan has been
None.
that is coordinated with the revised site
submitted. It shows the location of one tree
layout for the restaurant. Do not reduce
(UP) shifted in the vicinity of the dumpster
the quantities, sizes or character of the
enclosure.
previously approved landscaping.
Include a plant schedule in the
submittal.
Development paftern
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and
4)Coordinate all site, grading, utility,
A revised site plan is included in this
None.
should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This
landscape and lighting drawings with
submittal. Changes to the site from the
may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and
the new restaurant layout and service
previously approved plan include an
rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and
yard.
expanded dumpster enclosure and
pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements;
associated sidewalk changes, revised
insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography
parking along the front of the building, and
thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical,
sidewalk added on the EC side of the
existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the
building. Landscaping remains the same
site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding
with these changes.
development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does
not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor
street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian
walks should guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the
Entrance Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and
vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity
within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys,
steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as
to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements
from Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and
vistas on and around the site.
Site Gradin
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
4)Coordinate all site, grading, utility,
No major grading changes are proposed.
None.
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain
landscape and lighting drawings with
through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
the new restaurant layout and service
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours
yard.
on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Options for locating the wood slat/metal tube decorative framing on the rear elevation
2. Revised materials/colors
3. Intensity of illumination from exterior building lights
Staff offers the following comments on the proposal:
1. Provide for review the material/color samples for the lightened wood stain, the tile, block and paint.
2. Revise the drawings to include details for the trellis and wood slat/metal tube decorative frames.
3. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural drawings: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
4. Revise the photometric plan to show the location of exterior building -mounted lights and to include the illumination of those lights in the footcandle readings on the plan.
5. Clarify the nighttime appearance of the trellis. Indicate how bright the linear LED lighting will be on the wall and trellis.
6. Show on the elevations the locations of the arm mount bowl light fixture. If it is not proposed, eliminate it from the fixture schedule.
they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural,
rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller,
when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any
None.
There are no previously existing trees
None.
trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final
remaining on site.
Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be
shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion
and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading
activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion
of the development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns)
None.
No major changes to stormwater facilities
None.
should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
are proposed.
SIGNS
14)Note that a separate application is
The comment from the last review has
None at this time.
required for all signage, that signs are
been added as a note on the plan.
subject to the previously approved
Comprehensive Sign Plan for this
block, and no review of the illustrated
signage has been completed at this
time.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Options for locating the wood slat/metal tube decorative framing on the rear elevation
2. Revised materials/colors
3. Intensity of illumination from exterior building lights
Staff offers the following comments on the proposal:
1. Provide for review the material/color samples for the lightened wood stain, the tile, block and paint.
2. Revise the drawings to include details for the trellis and wood slat/metal tube decorative frames.
3. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural drawings: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
4. Revise the photometric plan to show the location of exterior building -mounted lights and to include the illumination of those lights in the footcandle readings on the plan.
5. Clarify the nighttime appearance of the trellis. Indicate how bright the linear LED lighting will be on the wall and trellis.
6. Show on the elevations the locations of the arm mount bowl light fixture. If it is not proposed, eliminate it from the fixture schedule.
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawin Date
A1.0
Dimensioned Floor Plan
1/26/2016
A2.0
Exterior Elevations
2/19/2016
A2.1
Exterior Elevations
2/19/2016
A0.3
Sight line study plan
2/19/2016
SL0.1
Site Lighting Photometric
1/26/2016
E1.0
Electrical Lighting Plan
2/19/2016
E3.2
Lighting Fixture Schedule
1/26/2016
E3.3
Lighting Fixture Schedule
2/19/2016
C-1
Cover Sheet
3/2/2016
C-2
Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan
2/15/16
C-3
Site Layout Plan
3/2/2016
C-4
Grading and Drainage Plan
3/2/2016
C-5
Utilities Plan
3/2/2016
C-6
Stormwater Management Calculations and Details
1/13/16
C-7
I Landscape Plan
3/2/2016
SE -2
Site Electrical Costco & Block G
8/8/2014
2 sheets
Color Elevations
2/17/201
ATTACHMENT A
M
COUNTY OF ALSEMARLE
Depmrtmemt of Commumity Development
401 MsImlire Road, North Wing
CharlottcsvilLe, Virginia 229024596
Phoma 434 2W5832 Fax 434 972-4126
February 10, 2016
Jared Taylorl[3J's Restaurant Inc.
10 S. Grant St
Roseville, CA 85678
RE: ARB -2015-1$4; eJ's Restaurant
Dear Mr- Taylor
The Albemarla County Archdeclural Review Board, at Its meeting on February 1, 2015, completed a
preliminary review of the above -noted request to revise the ARB -approved design of Building G2 in the
Stonefield Town Center to accommodate a BJ's restaurant. The Board offered the fol lowing corn mentsfor the
benefit of the appiican'.'s next submittal. Please note that the following comments are those that have been
dentified at ;his time. Ao ddional comments may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes
to the plan.
1, Revise the exterior material selections and Wors to relate micro consistently with the existing
context established throughout the StonefWd development.
2. Eliminate the murals from the proposal. Replace the murals with architectural detailing to relieve
blankness.
3. Add the standard window glass note to the drawings. Wndow glass # the EnLance Corridors
shave! rrtear the bitewing criteria: Visible light transm fiance CVL7] shah not drop below 40%
Vraible light refieefance (VLf7) shah not excaed30%SpeoRaofrons on the proposed wvndow glass
should ba submitted with the application for final review.
d. Coordinate all site, grading, utility, landscape and lighting drawings with tha new restaurant layout
and the service yard.
S. Revise the size andJor location of rooRap mechanlcal equipment to eliminate visittirily from the
Entrance Corridor.
6. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the drawings. Visabiflfyaf0mechanivalsquipmant
from Lie Entrance ConPdorsheN he alimmsfed.
7. Eliminate all exterior LED strip lighting from the building comloes.
$. include all Wilding -mounted lights in the photometric calculations.
8. Clarify on the drawings the ilium Inalion intended for the murals- Provide additional information to
clar.'fy the night-time appearance Df the murals -
10. Limit wall lights to down lights only -
11. Clarify the location and appearance of the mooed mirror light ( reference note 412 on the
elevation sheets).
12. Show on the elevations the locations Of the arm mount howl light fixture.
13- Submit a revised landscape plan that Is coordinated with the revised site fayoMforthe restaurant. Do
not reduce the q uantltles, sizes or character of the prevtausry approved landscaping Include a plant
schedule in the submlaal,
14. Nate that a separaLe application is required for all signage, that signs are subject to the prevfousy
approved Comprehensive Sign Plan for this hock, and W review of the illustrated signage has been
completed at this time.
You may submit your application for continued ARE review at your earliest eorrvenlenge. Application forms,
checklists and schedules are available an -line at vrvrre,s taemarle,grglAR6,
Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates an
each drawing- Please provide a memo including detailed responses Indicating how each comment has been
addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identlfy these changes in the memo also
Highlighting the changes In the drawing with "clouding' ar by other means will facilitate review and approval.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Margaret hlaliszewsii!
4"rlgy Chier of Planning
cc: Albemarle Place EAAP LLC
P O Box 528
Columbia SC 29202
10