The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200700023 Review Comments 2006-03-02pt 11, 1i. 1 JQ y COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Workmaiv'Hoffman Building Plan preparer: Kelly Gilmore, Keeney & Co. Architects [fax 978 -7438] Tim Miller, DDR [fax 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: HWK, LLC [fax 29608251 Plan received date: 08 February 2006 Date of comments: 02 March 2006 Reviewer: Max Greene The plans for Workman/Hoffinan Building submitted 08 February 2006 have received engineering review. The plans appear approvable once the following items are adequately addressed: A. Final site plan and Drainage plans 1. Prior to final approval a professional seal, signed and dated will be required on the plans. [18- 32.6.1 ] B. Stormwater Management Plan 1. SWM comments and/or conditions appear adequately addressed. C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600081) 1. The limits of construction/disturbance do not match the site plans. Please include all proposed grading associated with this plan within the limits of grading. 2. Please provide an Erosion Control Narrative. [VESCH ch 6. pg 131 3. Please provide Temporary Seeding (TS) on the plans. [VESCH 3.32] The Water Protection bond amounts will be created once the plans are approved. We have engineering meetings every Thursday from 2 -4pm where people can come in and discuss their plans with us. If you would like to schedule a time to meet, call our Senior Engineer Allan Schuck at ext. 3069 email him at aschuck(u . Al. RGINIa COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Workman /Hoffman Building Plan preparer: Kelly Gilmore, Keeney & Co. Architects [fax 978 -7438] Tim Miller, DDR [fax 979 -1681 ] Owner or rep.: HWK, LLC [fax 296 -9825] Plan received date: 07 March 2006 Date of comments: 09 March 2006 Reviewer: Max Greene The plans for Workman/Hoffman Building submitted 07 March 2006 have received engineering review. The plans appear approvable once the following items are adequately addressed: A. Final site plan and Drainage plans Minimum Checklist items appear adequately addressed. B. Stormwater Management Plan 2. SWM comments and /or conditions appear adequately addressed. C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200600081) 3. E &SC minimum checklist items appear adequately addressed. The Water Protection Bond amount is $18,000.00 and will be posted and approved prior to final approval. We have engineering meetings every Thursday from 2 -4pm where people can come in and discuss their plans with us. If you would like to schedule a time to meet, call our Senior Engineer Allan Schuck at ext. 3069 email him at aschuck c ,albemarle.org j OF Al.g ljC11X COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 March 15, 2007 Ron Keeney Keeney and Company Architects 1413 Sachem Place, Suite 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: ARB- 2006 -127: Workman Hoffman Building Final Review of a Site Development Plan (Tax Map 061, Parcel 124A5) Dear Mr. Keeney: I have reviewed your recent submittal for the above - referenced project consisting of site plan sheets C 1 thru C4, latest revision date 2/6/07, sheet C5, latest revision date 2/2/07, and architectural drawings A 1, A3, and A4, received 2/26/07. Four conditions of ARB approval remain outstanding as follows. The text in regular type represents the original comment from the Action Letter of January 8, 2007. Revise the proposed grading contours in the existing embankment to provide a minimum ten foot diameter radius where they meet the existing condition. The applicant's metro accoinI mlying this latest submission indicated that a note has been added to the site plan requiring a te17 foot diameter radius where pr oI)osed grading of the embank ties into the existing condition. This note is not located on the Site plan. Subsequent cor'1'espondence from the applicant has indicated that the note was mistakenly le f t off when the eh "(1 wings tit ere plotted. Prol a revised Site plan indicating that a teal foot diameter" radius frill be used where proposed grading of the embankment ties into the c isting condition. Provide shrubs, 24" in height, along the perimeter of the parking lot adjoining the existing embankment and the veterinary hospital. Species shall be based on the County's recommended species list. The ol)plicant Ineino indicated that they were under the impression that this requirement had been stricken from the ARB's final action taken at the January 8, 2007 meeting. Stiff has reviewed the 1'eC'01*ding of that ineeting and 1 that this requirement was n7 fact (i pal't of the final actior7 taken by the Board at that meeting. Revise the drawings so as to provide shrubs, 24 " in height, along the peritnetcr of the parking lot adjoining the cxis'ting cinbankinew and the i Leterinaiy hospital. 51)ecics shall he based on the County's recommended species list. The exact species n7ust he designated on the Plan. 3. If wall lights are needed, move them to the sides of the building and lower them to the band between the floors. Additional pole lighting may be required to light the parking area in front of the building. Provide cut sheets, on the lighting plan, of all exterior building and site lighting. Revise the lunimaire schedule to indicate that all fixtures will be installed in the horizontal position with no degree of tilt. The photoineti'ic plCiil Iricluded ii tln.s' silbiiils'sioil colitalnetl a llliiinitiii - c ,vche(lltle sttiting that the proposed wall ASW1, was to he installed with a 10 degree tilt up fi horiorntal. The cutsheet included on the drawing is of an ASW2 fimire, while the huninalre schedule is proposing the 4SW 1 fixture. Revise the hmlinare .schedule to indicate that all fixtures will be installed in the horizontal position with no degree of tilt Revise the photometric plan so that the ivall pack,fixture proposed ill the huninaire schedule corresponds with the cut sheet oil the same page. 4. Add one evergreen tree in the southwest corner of the parking lot between the bays of parking. The land eapc plan included in this subnlission indicates that a broadlcaf evergreen is to be planted in the southwest corner of the parking lot. The landscape schedule does not reference the exact species that is proposed, instead rgfe rring to the plant as a broadleaf ever gre en per county list. Revise the landscape schedule to indicate the exactspeciesproposed f n tree in the.sollthwest corner of the parking lot behlVeil the hays ofparking. Please provide: A. Two copies of revised drawings addressing the following: 1. Provide a revised site plan indicating that a ten foot dlalneter radllls will be Used where proposed grading of the einbanknient ties into the existing condition. 2. Revise the drawings so as to provide shi "ribs, 24 " in height, along the peritneter of the parking lot adjoining the existing einbalkment and the veterinary hospital. Species shall be based oil the Coinitv's recommended species list. The exact species nul.st he designated on the plan. 3. Revise the llnninaire schedule to indicate that all will he installed in the horizontal position with no degree of tilt Rei the photometric phis .so that the wall pack proposed in the llnninalre schedule corresponds with the cut sheet oil the same page 4. Revise the landscape schedule to indicate the exact species proposed . fbr the evergreen tree in the southwest corner of the parking lot betirecil the bays of parking. B. A memo indicating specifically how the condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, specifically identify those changes in the memo, also. Clear, specific, and accurate information will facilitate the review of your submittal. C. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brent W. Nelson Landscape Planner cc: File Pat Lawrence (Via Email) lS of ALIj COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 April 2, 2007 Ron Keeney Keeney and Company Architects 1413 Sachem Place, Suite 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: ARB- 2006 -127: Workman Hoffman Building Final Review of a Site Development Plan (Tax Map 061, Parcel 124A5) Dear Mr. Keeney: I have reviewed your recent submittal for the above- referenced project consisting of the following: Sheet Cl, Site Plan, latest revision date 3/21/07 Sheet C2, Site Details and Computations, latest revision date 3/6/07 Sheet C3, Landscaping Plan, latest revision date 3/21/07 Sheet C4, Filterra Notes and Details, latest revision date 2/6/07 Sheet C5, Photometric Plan, latest revision date 3/21/07 The revisions included in this submission address all outstanding conditions of ARB approval. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness. This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Brent W. Nelson Landscape Planner cc: ARB File Jennifer Workman (via email) Pat Lawrence (via email) David Slutzsky (via email) Rio East Office Park- Workman/Hoffinan Building Patrick Lawrence From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .Denunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 9:06 AM To: Patrick Lawrence Cc: Allan Schuck; Glenn Brooks; David E. Pennock Subject: Rio East Office Park- Workman /Hoffman Building Rio East Office Park- Workman /Hoffman Building Pat, I have reviewed the plan for the above project and have the following comments: The site accesses Rio East Court through an existing commercial entrance. Page 1 of 1 It looks like there will be some sidewalk work within the R/W for Rio East Court. A permit will need to be acquired from VDOT for this work. A detail for the sidewalk and curb ramp will need to be shown for the permit. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Thanks, Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager 434 -293 -0011 Ext. 120 joe1. dell unzio(- ovirginia DOT .org 4/12/2007 Sti 4/12/2007