Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200700025 Staff Report 2007-10-02ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: SDP 2007-00025: CV 340A Staff Gerald Gatobu, Megan Yaniglos, Brownsville/Ramsay Property Margaret Maliszewski Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Hearing: October 2, 2007 N/A Owners: James H. or Jeanne T. Ramsay Applicant: Cingular Wireless Acreage: 6.82 Acres Rezone from: Not applicable (Lease Area: 0.017 Acres) Special Use Permit for: Not applicable TMP: Tax Map 56, Parcel 35B By -right use: R1, Residential and EC, Location: On the north side of Rt. 250 West, Entrance Corridor Zoning east of Crozet Avenue [Rte. 240] and adjacent to Sheppard Run [Private]. Magisterial District: White Hall Proffers/Conditions: No Requested # of Dwelling Units/Lots: N/A DA - X RA - Proposal: Proposal to install a Tier II Comp. Plan Designation: CT -2, personal wireless service treetop facility. Development Area Reserve within the The proposed facility consists of a 67.4- Crozet Community. foot tall monopole measured above ground level (AGL), painted brown with an approximate top elevation of 730.7 feet, measured above mean sea level AMSL. Character of Property: Sloping, wooded, Use of Surrounding Properties: Single - undeveloped land family Residential Factors Favorable: Factors Unfavorable: 1. The lease area for the ground equipment 1. From vantage points on route 250, the and monopole is not located on critical proposed height of 67.4 feet was slopes or other significant features minimally visible. Where visible, the identified in the Crozet Development Area tower rose above the treetops with no Master Plan. wooded backdrop, causing the balloon to 2. The Architectural Review Board has be skylighted. approved the location based on low levels 2. Four pine trees are to be removed. of visibility from the Route 250, an Entrance Corridor. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this facility at (7) seven feet above the tallest tree. The height approved by the Planning Commission may be up to ten (10) feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed 10 feet above the tallest tree. STAFF CONTACT: PLANNING COMMISSION: AGENDA TITLE: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: Gerald Gatobu; Megan Yaniglos; Margaret Maliszewski October 2, 2007 SDP 07-025: Brownsville/Ramsey Property James H. or Jeanne T. Ramsay Cingular Wireless PROPOSAL: This is a proposal to install a Tier II personal wireless service treetop facility (Attachment A). The proposed facility consists of a 67.4 -foot tall monopole measured above ground level (AGL) with a ground elevation of 663 feet, measured above mean sea level (AMSL). The proposed monopole will be 10 feet higher than the identified reference tree located 14 feet from the tower site. The monopole will be painted brown and equipped with an array featuring three (3) flush - mounted panel antennas, approximately (51.6"x 12.1"x 4.5"). Supporting ground equipment will be contained within a proposed 12' by 16' Cingular concrete equipment pad. The lease area for the proposed facility is located on property described as Tax Map 56, Parcel 35B, which is approximately 6.82 acres and is zoned R-1, Residential and EC, Entrance Corridor. The site is located north of Rockfish Gap Turnpike [Rte. 250] just east of its intersection with Shephard Run [Private] in the White Hall Magisterial District. This application has been submitted in accordance with Section 15.2.2(17) of the Zoning Ordinance, which allows for Tier II wireless facilities by right in the R-1, Residential zoning district. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Development Area Reserve [CT 21 within the Crozet Community. CHARACTER OF THE AREA: The site of this proposed facility is on a wooded slope. The proposed tower site obtains access from a 20 -foot wide access easement extending off Shephard Run [Private]. Shephard Run is on the north side of Rockfish Gap Turnpike [Rte. 250]. Rockfish Gap Turnpike [Rte. 250] is an entrance corridor. There is a residence on the property. All properties adjacent to the subject parcel are zoned R-1, Residential. PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY: SUB 1999-225 Ramsay, James Family Division: (Plat done by Roger Ray and Associates). Created one 2.14 acre lot with a 6.82 acre residue 2 STAFF COMMENT: Section 3.1 provides the following definitions that are relevant to this proposal: Tier II personal wireless service facility: A personal wireless service facility that is a treetop facility not located within an avoidance area. Treetop facility: A personal wireless service facility consisting of a self-supporting monopole having a single shaft of wood, metal or concrete no more than ten (10) feet taller than the crown of the tallest tree within twenty-five (25) feet of the monopole, measured above sea level (ASL), and includes associated antennas, mounting structures, an equipment cabinet and other essential personal wireless service equipment. Avoidance area: An area having significant resources where the siting of personal wireless service facilities could result in adverse impacts as follows: (i) any ridge area where a personal wireless service facility would be skylighted; (ii) a parcel within an agricultural and forestal district; (iii) a parcel within a historic district; (iv) any location in which the proposed personal wireless service facility and three (3) or more existing or approved personal wireless service facilities would be within an area comprised of a circle centered anywhere on the ground having a radius of two hundred (200) feet; or (v) any location within two hundred (200) feet of any state scenic highway or by -way. Section 5.1.40(d), "Tier II facilities" states: "Each Tier II faciliti, may be established upon conamission approval of an application .satisfying the requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) and dernonstrating that the facility will be installed and operated in compliance with till applicable provisions of this chapter, criteria (1) through (8) below, and satisfying all conditions of'the architectural review board. The comrnission shall act on each application within the time periods established in .section 32.4.2.6. The commission shall approve each application, without conditions, once it determines that all of these requirements have been satisfied. If the commission denies an application, it shall identify which requirements were not satisfied and inform the applicant what needs to be done to satish, each requirement. " The applicant has submitted an application that satisfies the requirements set forth in Section 5.1.40(a) and has performed a balloon test at the location of the proposed facility (Attachments C and D). The Architectural Review Board (ARB) reviewed this request for compliance with the County's design guidelines for the entrance corridor and recommended approval. Section 5.1.40(d)(1): The facilitY shall comply with subsection 5.1.40(b) and subsection 5.1.40(c)(2) through (9). Staff has determined that the proposed facility's location conforms with the exemptions allowed by Section 5.1.40(b) and the proposed equipment meets all relevant design, moulting and size criteria that are set forth in Section 5.1.40(c)(2) and (3). The remainder of subsection (c) provides requirements that are subject to enforcement if the facility is approved. 3 Section 5.1.40(d)(2): The site shall provide adequate opporti.nities for screening and the facility shall be sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets, regardless of their distance frons the facility. /f the facility would be visible front a state scenic river or a national park or national forest, regardless of whether the site is adjacent thereto, the facility also shall be sited to minimize its risibility from such river, park or forest If the facility would be located on lands subject to a conservation easement or an open space easement, the facilityshall be sited to so that it is not visible from any resources specifically identified for protection in the gleed of easement. The proposed facility includes a monopole that would have a height of approximately 67.4 feet above ground level (AGL) or 730.7 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The height of the reference tree is approximately 720.7 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) and is located l7 feet southwest of the proposed monopole. A balloon test was conducted on March 21, 2007. During the site visit, staff observed a test balloon that was floated at the approximate height of the proposed monopole (10 feet above the height of the tallest tree). The balloon was visible from the entrance corridor, but minimally so. When visible, it was seen for a short distance on the Route 250 entrance corridor and it was seen through trees. The trees did not provide a backdrop for the balloon, so when it was visible, it was sky-lit. The low level of visibility is not expected to have a negative impact on the EC. The balloon was visible from adjacent parcels (Attachment D) at several points. Based on the information above, it is staffs opinion that the proposed facility will be minimally visible from adjacent parcels and streets. Section 5.1.40(d)(3): The facility shall not adversely impact resources identified in the county's open space plan. Staff's analysis of this request addresses the concern for the possible loss of aesthetic or historic resources. The proposed lease area is not delineated as a significant resource on the Crozet Development Area Master Plan (Attachment F). Staff believes there is no significant loss of resources related to the installation of the tower. The site plan shows the removal of four (4) existing pine trees. During the August 20`h ARB review hearing, the applicant stated that the four Pine trees shown on the site plan (to be removed) are either dead or dying. The County's wireless service facilities policy encourages facilities with limited visibility, facilities with adequate wooded backdrop, and facilities that do not adversely impact Avoidance Areas (including Entrance Corridors and historic resources)_ The proposed pole is expected to be visible for a relatively short period of time when traveling on Route 250 (an entrance corridor). The degree of visibility is not expected to have a negative impact on the Entrance Corridor based on these findings. The Architectural Review Board has approved the location with conditions (Attachment G). Therefore, staff feels the visibility of the monopole will not adversely impact the resources of the entrance corridor or historic districts. 4 Section 5.1.40(d)(4): The facility shall not be located so that it and three (3) or mare existing or approved personal wireless service facilities would be within an area comprised of a circle centered anywhere on the ground having a radius of two hundred (200) feet. There is no existing personal wireless service facility located within an area comprised of a circle centered anywhere on the ground having a radius of two hundred (200) feet. Section 5.1.40(d)(5): The maxinnrn base diameter of the monopole shall be thirty (30) inches and the maximum diameter at the top of the monopole shall be eighteen (18) inches. Notes on the site plan for this facility propose a monopole diameter not to exceed 30 inches at the base or 18 inches at the top. These dimensions comply with the maximum width requirements for treetop monopoles serving Tier II facilities. Section 5.1.40(d)(6): The top of the monopole, measured in elevation above mean .sea level, .shall not exceed the height approved by the connnssion. The approved height shall not be more than seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree within twenty-five (25).feet of the monopole, and shall include an�� base, foundation or grading that raises the pole above the pre-existing natural ground elet,ation; provided that the height approved by the commur commission n1, be up to ten (10) feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner- of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree; and there is not a inateriad difference in adverse impacts to resources identified in the countY's open space plan caused by the nionopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7),feet taller than the tallest tree. The applicant may appeal the coninri.ssionerIs denial of a modification to the board of supervisors as provided in subsection 5.1.40(4)(12). As mentioned previously in this report, the proposed monopole would have a height of approximately 730.7 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The height of the reference tree is approximately 720.7 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The proposed monopole will be (10) feet taller than the tallest tree within twenty-five (25) feet. The height approved by the Planning Commission may be up to ten (10) feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed 10 feet above the tallest tree. Based on the balloon test mentioned above, staff determined that there would be little or no material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed height (10) feet, than at a height of 7 feet taller than the tallest tree. Adverse impacts would be minimal. A height of 7 feet would be appropriate, but if the owner of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed 10 feet above the tallest tree, staff will support the Planning Commissions decision to approve the facility at 10 feet above the tallest tree. 5 Section 5.1.40(d)(7): Each wood monopole shall be a dark brown natural wood color; each metal or concrete monopole shall be painted a brown wood color to blend into the surrounding trees. The antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment cabinet, and the concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground equipment and the concrete pad need not be of such a color if they are enclosed within or behind an approved structure, faCade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closelh, matches that of the monopole; (ii) is consistent with the character of the area, and (iii) makes the ground equipment and concrete pad invisible at any time of year from anY other parcel or a public or primate street. The applicant is proposing the installation of a facility with a steel monopole. The proposed color for the tower and for the support cabinets is a brown paint (specific brown color sample will be turned in to the Architectural Review Board) to match existing surroundings. A note on the site plan indicates that the tower, ice bridge components, coaxial cables, antennas and supports are to be painted brown, and the final choice is to be approved by Albemarle County. Section 5.1.40(d)(8): Each wood monopole shall be constructed so that all cables, wiring and similar attachments that nun vertically from the ground equipment to the antennas are placed on the pole to face the interior of the property and away from public view, as determined by the agent. Metal monopoles shall be constructed so that vertical cables, wiring and sitnilar attachments are contained within the monopole's structure. A note on the site plan indicates that vertical cables, wiring and similar attachments must be contained within the monopole's structure. Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(II) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996: The regulation of the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless facilities by any state or local government or instrumentality thereof shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. The Telecommunications Act addresses concerns for environmental effects with the following language, "No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commissions' regulations concerning such emissions." In order to operate the proposed facility, the applicant is required to meet the FCC guidelines for radio frequency emissions. These requirements will adequately protect the public health and safety. It is staff's opinion that the denial of this application would not have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless communication services. 6 SUMMARY: Staff has identified factors which are favorable and unfavorable to this proposal: Factors favorable to this request include: 1. The lease area for the ground equipment and monopole are not located on critical slopes or other significant features identified in the Crozet Development Area Master Plan. 2. The Architectural Review Board has approved the location based on minimal visibility from the Route 250 Entrance Corridor. Factors unfavorable to this request include: 1. From a few vantage points on the adjacent streets [Route 250] the proposed height rises well above the treetops with no wooded backdrop, causing the balloon to be skylighted. 2. Four (4) Pine Trees are to be removed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this facility at (7) seven feet above the tallest tree. The height approved by the Planning Commission may be up to ten (10) feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that there is not a material difference in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed 10 feet above the tallest tree. In order to comply with Section 5.1.40(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission is required to provide the applicant with a statement regarding the basis for denial and all items that will have to be addressed to satisfy each requirement. ATTACHMENTS: A. Site Plan B. Vicinity Map C. Letter From Mr. Baldwin (Neighbor) D. Balloon photos at proposed location E. Balloon view from selected roads and adjoining property F. Location on Crozet Development Area Master Plan G. ARB action 7 PROJECT INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK: UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY INCLUDING NEW CABINETS AND NEW ANTENNAS ON A PROPOSED 7OWER SITE, ADDRESS: 570 SHEPHERD ROAD CR CROZET, VA 22932 cingular LATITUDE. 38' 03' D8.39" N LONGITUDE, 78' 41' 34.73" W GROUND ELEVATION 663.3'' (AMSL) WIRELESS JURISDICTION: ALBEMARLE COUNTY ZONING, RA, RURAL AREAS TAX MAP: 56-358 SITE NUMBER: CV 340 A PARCEL 1D: 05600-00-00-03580 CURRENT USE. RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY NAME OF APP -I CANT CINGULAR WIRELESS SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE ENGINEER. WILLIAM L RUCH, P E. CLOUGH HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES LLP 10800 MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE, SUITE 303 RICHMOND, VA 23235 UTILITY INFORMATION UTILITIES POWER: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER (886) 667-3000 VICINITY MAP APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS TELCO: VERIZON (804) 772-4042 DRAWING INDEX REV DIRECTIONS: FROM COX ROAD TAKE 1-295 W TO EXIT 53A/1-64 W. TAKE US -250 EXIT TOWARDS CROZET, KEEP RIGHT AT FORK ONTO US -250 E/ROCKFISH GAP TURNPIKE. PASS SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES 3 VA -CV 340 A- 01 TITLE SHEET VA -240 INTERSECTION, TURN LEFT ONTO SHEPHERD RUN. GO RIGHT INTO DRIVEWAY, DRIVE PAST AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION (AHJ) FOR THE LOCATION. THE EDITION VA -CV 340 A- 0 1 A OVERALL TOPOGRAPHIC DATA 2 HOUSE, TURN RIGHT ALONG DOMINION VA POWER LINES. OF THE AHJ ADOPTED CODES AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF CONTRACT AWARD SHALL VA -CV 340 A- 01 B DETAIL SURVEY & TREE LOCATION 2 GOVERN THE DESIGN. VA -CV 340 A- 02 LOCATION PLAN 3 M rile C VA -CV 340 A- 02A SITE PLAN 3 Sf BUILDING CODE: VA -CV 340 A- 03 ANTENNA PLAN & ELEVATION VIEW 2 p VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE (USBC), iNTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC 2003) VA -CV 340 A- 04 SLAB DETAILS 3 ELECTRICAL CODE - VA -CV 340 A- 05 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2 o t NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NEPA) 70 - 1999, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, VA -CV 340 A- 06 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 2 ne Lon REFERENCED IN 2000 ICC ELECTRICAL CODE VA -CV 340 A- 06A TREE PROTECTION, SEDIMENT &EROSION CONTROL NOTES 2 ✓ o VA -CV 340 A- 06B TREE PROTECTION, SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 3 °k r eo ,Psfo SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS. VA -CV 340 A- 07 BILL OF MATERIALS 2 0 AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (ACI) 318, BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL VA -CV 340 A- 08 COAX COLOR CODING 2 °o �a ?a, CONCRETE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION (AISC), MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, ASD, NINTH EDITION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (TA) 222-F. STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL Meadow Dr ANTENNA TOWER AND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES: TIA 607, COMMERCIAL BUILDING GROUNDING AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE) 81, GUIDE FOR MEASURING EARTH NOTES E 1. SEE SHE FOLLOWING NOTES, SYMBOLS AND DETAILS, BECHTEL DOCUMENT NUMBER HE FOLLOWINGNOT RESISTIVITY, GROUND IMPEDANCE, AND EARTH SURFACE POTENTIALS Of A GROUND SYSTEM 24782 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION THIS SITE DESIGN PACKAGE_ J- PROJECT IEEE 1 100 (1999) RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR POWERING AND GROUNDING OF ELECTRONIC CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES .. DETAIL 102) SOIL COMPACTION NOTES FOR SLAB ON GRADEDETAIL 102A) SITE EQUIPMENT APPLICABLE: BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS DETAIL 103) IEEE C62.41, RECOMMENDED PRACTICES ON SURGE VOLTAGES IN LOW VOLTAGE AC POWER CIRCUITS ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS. .. DETAIL 112 ^^ 250 (FOR LOCATION CATEGORY °C3" AND "HIGH SYSTEM EXPOSURE") RF NOTES .. DETAIL 116) 24"X10' ICE BRIDGE W/ BURIAL POST DETAIL 155A) SITE WORK GENERAL, NOTES DETAIL 619) = TELCORDIA GR -1275, GENERAL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES DETAIL 6203) GENERAL NOTES. DETAIL 623 ^ St°te H 751 TELCORDIA GR -1503, COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTIONS CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS DIAGRAM DETAIL 636 A o ANSI T1.311, FOR TELECOM - DC POWER SYSTEMS - TELECOM, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION T FOR ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN SECTIONS OF LISTED CODES AND STANDARDS REGARDING MATERIAL, F3P METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC 00 REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC REOUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN. Co �P heO`her C DETAIL f'10,3 CINGULAR CDNSTRUCTI6Hv ®_-_-__-- WGULAR RF ________ --- ---- C804) 450-1983 �1 r 0W> 290-5034 / CINGULAR COMPLIAN---------- - BIt-OCL CONSTRUCTION. ------_ (804) 201-0684 10, C4 4927-D957 SCALE. I"=2000' C SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE Xcingular `D � CINGULAR WIRELESS C; 3/07 I�5,_c FDR Zc , - ' 162 n e SITE NO. CV 340 A wIBeLEss ai„ r, roR zgr,rc % W 0 "1LE SHEET 1 CLOUGH MAR13OUR6 ASSOCIATES LLP 19800 MaIOthwn Tum�ke, Tire Wncneskr BuEAIr.S. 57C SH-PI=RUN --- VA LIBER"Y FL47_P } QvC GiX ROAD,i_ •!0C C "; ',JCS ',cS�ED :CR ZCNIi:c V N0. DA- RSV �.O"li B" CW:WING NUMccn' RL" 9uac 109, AK1.-ti7rA VA23235-17M am looa2DI9ra • »w«cnuannamar om ^�L�� _t33L GLEN ALLEN, Vi 23060 �q 82-�21 VA 340 A-01 3 CHP, JOB 1 4307- 1038--' GO' ca:c ns s4own DeslcNeD Bt �Rv DRAWN By C p24, Attachment A I - N/R STEVEN & CYNIHiA RAMSEY T.0 56-35C D9 1679 PG 666 SURVEY (OVERALL) DETAIL 1"=50' N �! Ty ��• CARROL It JUDITH HERRING N 56-IOSI 0 B 666 PC 109 PROPERTY LINE-/ ALONG C/L STREAM p tCMOSED 25'.30' lCA5CA5C LAR M°.A 9 EXISTUFC OKRHEAO UIILIN LINE EXIST may/ POMEa POU (up.) ..--..•'."_�^""�"��y. V _. -' f� J �..��+t-..ah^ q.-""' \-�' •tom-=ir4 � �'h�_-.='-'� - ^r��.i«.^ ?ROL &JUaTH HERR TY 56-26A2 D8 1479 163 PLAT LEASE AREA SITE DETAIL 1"=10' N/F / � 39 TIE UNE' PROPOSED LEASE AREA i 3AMES H. or 3EANNE T. RAMSEY GRO ELEV. OP ELEV.NEIGNT DESCRIPTION t I 16• T. M. 56-35B CLBLE LL OI � A •9r D.B. 16/9-686,695 & 696 PLAT 65111 7111 59.5' A I I •B' D.B. 156F-13},737 PLAT 7 ' 57.9' A PINE •x' 6' 660.8' 689.6' 26.8' A WOWS LINE 'C' 10' 7213' 59A' A PINE •Y GPS CONTOL PONT �' �AI 69&5 37.1' ACL 50' R/w I EXIST. �v ED 292-292 PLAT b' H-3966910700 1' m 1 Z' E-1142)097,606 ELEv60544 ! 662.9' '� N ,o 1 i PROPOSED 20' / ' HAD e3-\ / 'R R INGRESSIEGERS5 •AA. V 661.4' r N/F 2 EASEMENT - � 7 ' I CLAYTdN TAY _OR or MARY P. RAMSEY \ IO LH. Sb -3}81 I TUI„P P(IPLAR 8' 637.2' 1 7' ISLE' AGL PINE 'CC' 10" 663.8' 717.9' 54.1' AOL REO OAK 8" 659.5- L 54.6 A S°e 'DO" 8' 663.1' I •a Fal. \ 6' \�� FSRp •.. r:CPS CONTROL LINE' I , ` I 724.1' 3.0' A PINE •NIL ' A _.=L_t 6 662.0' 704.4' 42.4' A PINE ic' I 6 7 1 ' 4' 1 \ EXISTING 40' ACCESS EASEMENT N04'L040 W PINE . 6• __....._.-""-"----.------ 6 . 624 D 7 ............................................... ' ' _ ' ' _.... ................................ B' 662.1' 702.2' 10.0' A SHEPHARD RUN A� 7 I' 51. 6' A PIN . N, f0' 665.1' N/F D se IDD 'N' 6. -14'T i' GARTH & BARBARA BALDWN U. M. 56-350 PINE IV 665.5' D B 704 PG. 372 SCALE IN DEET LEASE AREA SITE DETAIL 1"=10' I u+sE coR liw) PROPOSED YONCPDLE HEIGHT TO BE APPRDx 10' A80VE TREE EE ',i BASE ELEV• 6633' POLE TOP EL EV .730 7' PROPOSED MONOPOLE LAT RUDE- 38^L`3'U1 3966' LONGITUDE -78'41'34.7364' NA083 NORTH -3906788 99 EAST - 11427343.45 vROPO4a wtz LE.% "A ;CALL IN FEET TREE LOCATION DETAIL 1"=20' _ •I .K. W 'A 'E'* •u �i 'H' 'o'P. •0' •e'er _ e w4►r}�. 'NN 10 46 E]70 .10' 'i T.:3 • 03 •.x. ,I EC• 2' Y 11. � kK' J3 •REFERETiCE TAEE {Ip' # 10' RED OAR 55,5' AGL PROROSID 26' GROUND ELEVATION 0-1 REE = 665.2' LASE AREA TREETOP ELE/. =720.7' p 2o 4o •� © •�•i SCALE IN FEET TREE LEGEND NOTE: AGL DENOTES (A80VE GROUND LEVEL) GENERAL NOTES: BEARING DATUM SHOWN ON PROPOSED LEASE AREA BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION ON 11/22/06 • HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 85 DEED REFERENCE: D.B. 1679-688, 695 & 596 PLAT PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE COMPILED AND 00 NOT REPRESENT A COMPLETE BOUNDARY SURVEY PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS & RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE BINDER LOCATION SIZE GRD ELEV. OP ELEV. HEIGHT DESCRIPTION LOCATION IYoCXP6, CH AR GRO ELEV. OP ELEV.NEIGNT DESCRIPTION EQMA+E71I PPbP p 16• 660.9' CLBLE LL OI � A •9r 10" 65111 7111 59.5' A DECIDUOUS I u+sE coR liw) PROPOSED YONCPDLE HEIGHT TO BE APPRDx 10' A80VE TREE EE ',i BASE ELEV• 6633' POLE TOP EL EV .730 7' PROPOSED MONOPOLE LAT RUDE- 38^L`3'U1 3966' LONGITUDE -78'41'34.7364' NA083 NORTH -3906788 99 EAST - 11427343.45 vROPO4a wtz LE.% "A ;CALL IN FEET TREE LOCATION DETAIL 1"=20' _ •I .K. W 'A 'E'* •u �i 'H' 'o'P. •0' •e'er _ e w4►r}�. 'NN 10 46 E]70 .10' 'i T.:3 • 03 •.x. ,I EC• 2' Y 11. � kK' J3 •REFERETiCE TAEE {Ip' # 10' RED OAR 55,5' AGL PROROSID 26' GROUND ELEVATION 0-1 REE = 665.2' LASE AREA TREETOP ELE/. =720.7' p 2o 4o •� © •�•i SCALE IN FEET TREE LEGEND NOTE: AGL DENOTES (A80VE GROUND LEVEL) GENERAL NOTES: BEARING DATUM SHOWN ON PROPOSED LEASE AREA BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION ON 11/22/06 • HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 85 DEED REFERENCE: D.B. 1679-688, 695 & 596 PLAT PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE COMPILED AND 00 NOT REPRESENT A COMPLETE BOUNDARY SURVEY PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS & RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE BINDER LOCATION SIZE GRD ELEV. OP ELEV. HEIGHT DESCRIPTION LOCATION SIZE GRO ELEV. OP ELEV.NEIGNT DESCRIPTION 'A' 16• 660.9' 738.9- 7&0' A A •9r 10" 65111 7111 59.5' A DECIDUOUS •B' B' 7 ' 57.9' A PINE •x' 6' 660.8' 689.6' 26.8' A PINE 'C' 10' 7213' 59A' A PINE •Y 6' 661.4' 69&5 37.1' ACL DECIDUOUS b' 14' 1' 772,1 ' 600' A PIKE Z' 6' 662.9' 702.2' 393' A REO MAPLE ' 711,3' ' A FIN •AA. V 661.4' 716.1 55.0' A OA% - 7 ' 718.2' IO 661.5' 726.0' 61 5 A TUI„P P(IPLAR 8' 637.2' 1 7' ISLE' AGL PINE 'CC' 10" 663.8' 717.9' 54.1' AOL REO OAK 8" 659.5- L 54.6 A IIHITE OAK 'DO" 8' 663.1' 712.9' 49.8' A RED MAPLE l' 6' 7 I. ' 65.3' A 12' 661.1' 724.1' 3.0' A PINE •NIL ' A _.=L_t 6 662.0' 704.4' 42.4' A PINE ic' I 6 7 1 ' 4' 14 662.4' 719.8' 57.4 A PINE . 6• D' 37 . AQ. GIN 'F9i' B' 662.1' 702.2' 10.0' A PINE 6' 7 I' 51. 6' A PIN . N, f0' 665.1' 720.Y 55.5' A RED OAK 'N' 6' i' 49.5' A PINE 10 665.5' 713.0' 47.5 AG. BLACK (AJY "0" 6" 4' 49.5' A AR •8K' 12' 665.5' 717.5' 52.0' REO MAPLE p' 8" - 50.4' A LL. 6' 666.3' 707.4' 41.1' A0. REO MARE "0' 12- 69.0** A iYl• B' 666Y 724.8' 58 5 •R' 12" 7 71.5' A NN 8' 666.8' 711,Y 44.7 PRE a. 7 ' A GV 665.4' 716.6' i PINE •Y B' 4 ' 708. ' S PP' 6' 667.1 702 I' 350' A PRH' u' B" 4. ' 7053' 50.8' A OEODuOu5 6' 670.7 703.1' 3 .S' A REO MAPLE 7165' S&3' A DECIDUOUS 'RR' 6' 668.9' 701.9' SS O' PIE # C TIMMONS GROUP :'':'ti���- Xcingular -� yJPc CINGULAR WIRELESS 7-13-07 -- 54M LMYNOP1 wt I R4r76;tU1 IM1EFUVIFCMnI TOCIU10100 CLOUGH HARBOUR 6 AB8oCLATEB LLP 10800MFao6,l.nrumpr.,TIO W14100WBunnp. su2e 3O3. RJdlmma vazrr3s47o0 M.M:(Ra)e97a664--do,ghhwb, - C- PP04ECT 4 14307-1027-1601 SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 570 SHEPHERD RUN CROZET, VA 22932 WIRELESS LIBERTY PLAZA 1 4601 COX ROAD, SUITE 300 GLEN ALLEN, VA 23060 I -1 -07 NEW 0 LOCATION - PER CLIENT AN AN AN u ALISON N. )- HANSON DETAIL SURVEY AND TREE LOCATION 1 -29-07 RTE 250 Rory 015-P N COMME AH AH AH `,•J No.2617 F`r 0 GATE REVISIONS BY CHK �i7-CC%f NWBER RCV CLLE AS SHOWN bESICNEO BY: KLS DRAWN BY:KLS a CS 'gyp SUAVE sNEET 2 of 2 O YH YTp Ap Pm Ngp1pLA9 VIRGINIA I NORTH CAROLINA I WESTVIRGINIA PREPARED AT THE CORPORATE OFFICE 1001 Boulders Parkway, Ste. 1 I Richmond, VA 23225 TEL 804.200.6500 PAX 804.560.0648 Www.Gmmonsxorn 4 N/F ' CARROL & JUDITH HERRING TM 56-26A2 / D 6 1479 183 PLAT 61-`3 --PROPOSED 25X30' LEASE AREA `2 /PROPOSED UNDERGROUND 7FLCO RUN LEGEND TREE POWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE - I PJ'.VER POLE �� � {.�,���I r 7-/ T 16'✓ �� �n—� y� ----- -------- EXIST `OWEr TOPOGRAPHIC LINES P YP .tib- '"i`0 _ ,�r�{?�-- _'-' — -+;, n -'n-- n• -C --- k' — — PROPERTY LINES _ S0,970'407- _ _ �� NO WITH C q S842 398E 316.00' EX/SI7NG DIRT ROAD I TO SE UTILIZED FOR 1 N/F j "77E LINE" PROPOSED ACCESS TO S/TE JAMES H. or JEANNE T. RAMSEY LEASE AREA T.M. 56-35Bi D.B. 1679-688,695 & 696 PLAT +� + �tit yP`� D.B. 1566-735,737 PLAT h�G ��� I / ` I I FORGIWP� •� �V EXIST / .� FOR MORE INFORMATION CO -ACT THE [� STATE CORP URATI D C RAILROAD E-,DIVS10, �6/tio 1 \` WOODS LINE `I I Oh UTILI 1' AND RAILROAD SAFETY V \ CAL'."' 1-800-552-I9<5 i IVC I 50' R/W TOWER BASE: GPS CCNiOL POINT I D.E 292-292 PLAT LATITUDE: 38'-03'-08.39" N H-3906910.700 1 � LONGITUDE: 78'-41'-34.73" W E -11x27097 806 I s (PER NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983) ELE14270 44 t t\ ELEVATION: 663.3'± AMSL r1 AD 83—\ PROPOSED 20' �i/ 03' INGRESS/EGRESS �� ,/� I �I N (PER NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929) N/F EASEMENT- �NI CLAYTON TAYLOR or MARY R RAMSEY GENERAL NOTES: \ T.M. 56 35B1 I 1. BASEMAP INFORMATION BASED UPON A SITE VISIT CONDUCTED ' p ���•��� BY CLOUGH HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES ON 10/19/06 AND A 6 50' SURVEY BY TIMMONS GROUP DATED 11/22/06. �\w\'-------_--1 2. NO NOISE, SMOKE, DUST, OR ODOR WILL RESULT FROM THIS FACILITY. 3. THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION \ tel\ (THERE IS NO HANDICAP ACCESS REQUIRED). \, \ I-EXISTI,1C 4. THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND DOES NOT REQUIRE POTABLE SURVEY "GPSELCC PCE ' Q WATER OR SANITARY SERVICE. CONTROL LINE" ' / N a 5. POWER TO THE FACILITY WILL BE MONITORED BY A SEPARATE -- METER. ---------------------------------------I,- Ctf O 5, LIGHTING TO BE USED FOR TEMPORARY MAINTENANCE ONLY. \ NO970'40"W _ = � J� w —T -o— — - _. _, tl;n Q w 7. SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ANTENNA ELEVATION AND AZIMUTH E>:ISTING 4C' ACCESS EASEMENT 30078 J �/ m WITH RF ENGINEERING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE ANTENNA V Go �L = Q CONFIGURATION SHEETS FOR SITE SPECIFIC DETAILS \ o. D.B 67? PC 62,1 V) cr -------------------SHEPHERD RUN----------------------� Uj �/ / SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO \ � � O a'3 S. N/F -c 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL GARTH &BARBARA BALDWIN PERMITS & INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, 6S90SE T.M. 56-35D LOCATION PLAN + ^ � nl FULL SCALE 1 �sr D.B. 704 PG. 372 NOTE•LIPpl- 0 30 60 FT i' BASEMAP INFORMATION BASED UPON A SITE ® H J� i' VISIT CONDUCTED BY CLOUGH HARBOUR & � SALE 1"=60'-0" ASSOCIATES ON 10/19/06 AND A SURVEY BY TIMMONS GROUP DATED 11/22/06. O� a c ,'13/e7ss .0 FOR >_pu:ar,p Y LINGULAR WIRELESS SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE Xcingular 2 07/.;/0 ISSUED FOR ZONf:G 41 I'?9162 SITE NO. CV 340 A WIRELESS SSU OR CONG R Ke CLOUGH HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES LLP - , , LOCA T ON P -AF; IoemMlcmma nmpac,rne',vnmc�Ic:su.m,, 570 SHEPHERD RUN �IE�P,il PLA:F C' '�,:/D� Ics�ED roa zor.INc r wLR. w�R �)� /�Sure 303 RiclHond. VA 2323547 UC CRL7, VA 22932 48x1 ,:(; RVA, SU E 3:nom T,K PP' Mo)P9735W vwwcWuThaibet.,— GLEN AL LN, VA 23060 i-(lk ,. iAWiN, hUNB:n F'f.' CH JQCB 14367-'038-1601 CA E. AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY JRM DRAWN BYa V — to 24/6? -421 VA CIV 340 A -rig 3 C1 I` e, I `Y 7EMPORARY TREE PROITC77ON FENCING (TYP.) ,, . LEGEND TREE - PROPOSED PERMANENT TREE EX/STING PINE TREES / PR07FC77ON FENCING (SEE TO BE REMOVED-� -_-- _ TRIANGULAR BOARD FENCE E' % DETAILS ON SHEET A-06) PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE �- `� �\ \ (APPROX.. 5 LF) -� \� ' + j PROPOSED LIMITS OF D/S I URBANCE/L OCA 77ON .� OF SIL T FENCE PROPOSED CINGULAR- L,. EQUIPMENT ON 12'x16'(------------- - CONCRETE PAD------_ PROPOSED CINGULAR _ 25'x30' LEASE AREA EXIS77NG PINE 7REES TO BE REMOVED _ I \ 00 N'--.`E-- j TREE LEGEND LOCATION SIZE HEIGHT DESCRIPTION '9( 16' 78.6' AGL ASH 'X' 8' 57.9' AGIL PINE 'C' 10' 59.0' AGIL PINE 'D' 14' 60,0' AGL PINE 'E' 8' 52.5' AGL PINE 'F' 12' 61.0' AGL RED OAK 'G' 8' 61.5' AGL PINE 'H' 8' 54.0' AGIL MHITE OAK '1' 6' 65.3' AGE PINE 'FF' 8' 66.6' AGL FINE 'K' 10' 66.4' AGE PIN C 6' 33.8' ACL PINE 1 6' 51.8' AGE PINE 'N' 1 6' 415' ACL PINE '0'1 6' 44.5' AGL TULIP POPLAR 'P'1 8' 50.4' AGE PINE 'O' 12' 69.0' AGL PINE 'R' 12' 71.5' AGE PINE 'S' 8' 68.0' AGL DECIDUOUS 'Y 8' 54.8' AG DECIDUOUS 'U' 8' S0 8' A DECIDUOUS 'V 8' 1583' A DECIDUOUS PROPOSED MONOPOLE 10 ABOVE ,.. r ' REFERENCE TREE l� ^RFERENCE 7REE f TJ "J - AA` - GROUNDDo. JDD" ELEVA7701V 0 BASE OF 7REE 665.2' AMSL TREE TOP ELEVA RON =720.7 AMSL l PROPOSED 12' WIDE ACCESS ROAD LOCATION SIZE HEIGHT DESCRIPTION '9( lo' 59.5' AGL DECIDUOUS 'X' 6' 28.8' AGIL PINE Y 6' 37.1' AGE RED MAPLE 6' 39.3' AGL PINE -AA- 6' 55.0' AGL RED OAK 10' 64.5' AGL.TULIP POPLAR 'CC' 10' 541' ACL RED OAK 'DD' 8' 49 8' AGL RED MAPLE 'EE' 12' 63.0' AGL PINE 'FF' 6' 42.4' AGL PINE 'GG' 14' 57.4' AGL PINE 'HH' 8' 40, D AGE PINE 'Il' 10' 55.5' AGE RED OAK 'JJ' 10' 47.5' AOL BLACK CUN 'KK' 12' 52.0' AGL RED MAPLE 'LL' 8' 41.1' AGE RED MAPLE 'NLA' 8' 58.5' AGE PINE 'NN' 8' 44.7 AGL PINE 8" 51.2 ACL PINE 'PP' 6' 35.0' A PINE '00' 6' 32.5' A RED MAPLE 'RR' 6' 33.0' AG PINE CLOUGH HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES LLP 10E W Nldlalhm, Tumpke. The Vf-;e er SjOl j, $2 303, 5-4 Rtll d, VA 2323100 'A_ Ie041891.3%4 - ww«croud+ramw.mm CTIA JOB 4 14307-1038-1601 I I PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT -\ I PROPOSED CINGULAR P0141ER & 7n CO CONDUIT _ / ti - EXISTING -�i-E%1577NG HARDWOOD POWER POLE-\ 7REES WITHIN LEASE AREA TO REMAIN _ cF - OHE ----OHF ---- �l / - - JHE - -- -- OHE OHE -O --=OHE �---- -E11577NG DIRT ROAD TO BE ! U77LIZED FOR ACCESS TO S17E- i SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A 570 SHEP�4ERD RL,r, CROLET, VA 22932 Xcingular WIRELESS LIBOR- ;'I ATA ' 48-'T COX ROAD, SJITE 3CO GLEN ALLEN, VA 2306E POWER LINE TELEPHONE ONE ------- ---- - -- - -- TOPOGRAPHIC LINES LEASE LINE MONOPOLE DETAILS: 1. PROPOSED TOWER ELEVATION = 730.7' AMSL 2. MONOPOLE DIAMETER NOT TO EXCEED 30" AT THE BASE OR 18" AT THE TOP. 3, MONOPOLE TO BE PAINTED BROWN TO MATCH EXISTING SURROUNDINGS. 4. LIGHTENING ROD WILL NOT EXCEED T" IN DIAMETER AND WILL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 2' ABOVE THE TOP OF THE MONOPOLE, NOTES: 1. EXISTING STRUCTURE, BOUNDARY, TRUE NORTH, AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION WERE TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY TIMMONS GROUP DATED 11/22/06. 2. SUBJECT TO ANY STATE OF FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE. PROPERTY LINES ARE ONLY SHOWN AS APPROXIMATE. 3. SUBJECT TO ANY STATE OF FACTS THAT AN UP-TO-DATE ABSTRACT OF TITLE WOULD DISCLOSE 4. SUBJECT TO ALL RIGHTS, EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 5. A BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED BY CLOUGH HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS SITE. 6, NOT TO BE USED FOR LAND TRANSACTION PURPOSES. TOWER BASE' LATITUDE: 38-03'-08.39" N LONGITUDE: 78'-41'-34.73" W (PER NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983) ELEVATION: 663.3'± AMSL (PER NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929) ®®®L If dor 4 FULL SCALE "=4'-O"- 8 FT s- Y �� t7 HALF SCALE 1 "=8'-0" ®� UCH Toa CINGULAR WIRELESS 07/13,107 ISSJEG FCF Z0N04,-,03/2:%07 I�,$rE FOF lCf41Nf. %ITE P':tirJ'SJ'Ji':� F;n lDVll�fcVO DATE RCv'SIOl.S B�DRAWN- NUNB_F e >CAF AS SHOWN DESIGNED EY JRV DRAWN 8". _ AL pYQ© 24%82-42 VA -CV --'^G A -02A MICROFLECT TRIBRA+ ADAPTER KIT P/N E EMS MTG—POO-05 MECHANICAL DOWNTILT BRACKET EMS M- MECHAI DOWNTI ANDREV AN TEN N OF 3) 11— Ar,r — � (TYP) ANTENNA MOUNTING NTS MICROFLECT TRI—BRACKET P/N 155934 EQUAL NOTE: TOWER, ICE BRIDGE COMPONENTS, COAX CABLES, ANTENNAS AND SUPPORTS TO BE PAINTED BROWN, FINAL CHOICE TO BE APROVED BY ALBEMAREL COUNTY. ^�D MONOPOLE CT CHAIN mwty n[T P/N 81653 OR EQUAL ONE ANTENNA PER SECTOR TOWER MOUNTING NTS THIS INFORMATION IS SHOWN FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. BOTH THE TOWER STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATION WILL BE/HAVE BEEN DESIGNED BY OTHERS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE FINAL TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN SHOULD BE COMPARED TO THE SITE PLAN TO AVOID POTENTIAL CONFLICTS i PROPOSED CINGULAR ICE BRIDGE I—PROPOSED CINGULAR II / EQUIPMENT ELEVATION VIEW NTS THIS BOTH DESIC GRADE = 663.3' AMSL FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY, AND FOUNDATION WILL BE/HAVE BEEN ip CONSTRUCTION, THE FINAL TOWER LOMPARED TO THE SITE PLAN TO AVOID Y IV clik'�' CLOUGH HARBOUR B ASSOCIATES LLP 70800 Mdothon Tumpike, The Winchester Bui0ing, Surae 303, Richmond, VA 23235-4700 Mam leo4>as7-3561 wvwraoughhaeaurcom GIMP �'OB 14307—�031�-- 6n• NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A 570 SHEPHERD PUN CRO -7:"1, VP 2293 Xcingular WIRELESS I'BFRT> PLAZA '� 48x1 COX ROAD, S'JITF 304 GLEfJ AL'_EN, `✓r 23160 2 G7/13/C7 ;55'JEC FOR ZONING r y® CINGULAR WIRELESS RUCH 00SITE � j'-:9162 )+® ANTE6;NA PLAN' & ELEVATION ViE,1 g o DRnW NC NUMB'-' �' / 'FJ 4 �, �~ 24782-421 CV 34G A-03 n2� 1 C3/29/07 ISSJED rOR 20NINc E, D C</11/07 ISSJEL' FOR ZONING J LR WLR r!G DATE REJI510%JS fR'` _. SC4Lf AS SHOWN D SIGNED 3Y JRM DRA'1;N Bl'®� C: ® Q B .0 NOTES: NCTEs NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL- Be PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1 FOR LME PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWNG DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 CONTRACTOR - BECHTEL 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SUBCONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUC-ION) TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OWNER - CINGULAR 2. ALL WELDING SHALL 6E PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES CEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS; ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J24 IN 2 PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS. THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION". PAINTED SURFACES FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXIS`ING CONDITONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS ATTENTION OF CONTRACTOR. AROUND OR NEAR UPLITIES SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4"0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS 3 ALL MATERIALS FURNSHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC TRENCHING & EXCAVATION. 4. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT 5/8" DIA. ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILI7,1' COMPANY ABBREVIATIONS SPECIFICATIONS. 5 INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGJLATIONS. PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S 4 DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, (E) EXISTING DRAWINGS ND REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS IND CATED ON THE MLN MINIMUM 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL DRAWINGS UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. SHALL BE INSPECTIONSREQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED , N.T:S, NOT TO SCALE REMOVED ANC/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT N ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. 6. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH REF REFERENCE POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, 6. ALL "EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL OR MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. RADIO FREQUENCY SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER AND/OR LOCAL HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. THE ANCHOR BOLT DOWEL AND ROD SHALL 7, IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE T. T.B.D. TO BE DETERMINED UTILITIES BE STAINLESS STEEL WITH STAINLESS STEEL WASHERS SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR 6, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: 8. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDING T. B. TO BE RESOLVED CONSTRUCTION. CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING. T.p TYPICAL DETAILS 620 REQ REQUIRED 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CINGULAR SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. ` - 9. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE EGR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING SATISFACTION OF OWNER. AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE 8. THE SITE SHALL 8E GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER 70 FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. NOTES: 10. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL MOB MASTER GROUND BUS 9. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, ASTM A184, ASTM A185 AND THE DESIGN AND CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION, EG EQUIPMENT GROUND GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. BCW BARE COPPER WIRE FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OFSAIDSMART SAPS-AOOZ-00002, 2. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATION 24782- "GENERAL INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE 10. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LINGULAR GSM SITES.' GSM GEN GENERATOR UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60, GENERAL NOTES IQR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) 11. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED "B" RBS RADIO BASE STATION OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE TOA UNIFORM SLOPE, AND STABILIZED 70 PREVENT EROSION. STANDARD, LINO, DETAIL 623 SYMBOLS 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ES/El SOLID GROUND BUS BAR CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION'S CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH ........ 3 IN. C/7 SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: NOTES: N A SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR 6 AND LARGER ..........................2 IN. SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES: 5 AND SMALLER & WWF,.,,.,,..1 1/2 IN.EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO REMOVE VEGETATION & TOPSOIL EXPOSE UNDISTURBED oTo 2 -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT NATURAL SUBGRADE AND PLACE CRUSHED STONE AS REQUIRED.o o CIRCUIT BREAKER DETAIL619 CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL IN. 2, COMPACTION CERTIFICATION: AN INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY A QUALIFIED o SINGLE -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC .....................3/4 BEAMS AND COLUMNS. 1/2 IN. GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER 1S ACCEPTABLE. CIRCUIT BREAKER 5. A CHAMFER 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF 3. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION, THE "UNDISTURBED Q CHEMICAL GROUND ROD CONCRETE, ONO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. SOIL" BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH "COMPACTION EQUIPMENT", LISTED BELOW, TO AT ® GROUND ROD LEAST 907 MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 METHOD C. 6. CONCRETE/EXPANSION ANCHORS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. O GROUND ROD W/ INSPECTION WELL INSTALLATION, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED 4. COMPACTED SUBBASE SHALL BE UNIFORM & LEVELED. PROVIDE 6" MINIMUM CRUSHED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO STONE OR GRAVEL COMPACTED IN 3" LIFTS ABOVE COMPACTED SOIL. GRAVEL SHALL BE DISCONNECT SWITCH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS NATURAL OR CRUSHED WITH 100 7 PASSING 1" SLEEVE. SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR O METER ENGINEERING APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT: EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY RAMSET/REDHEAD OR HAND OPERATED DOUBLE DRUM, VIBRATORY ROLLER, VIBRATORY PLATE ■ CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION APPROVED EQUAL. COMPACTOR OR JUMPING COMPACTOR. • COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: SOIL COMPACTION NOTES ®®000 H®104 4� GROUNDING WIRE FOR SLAB ON GRADE��� ®-- DETAIL 102 DETAIL 102.A m0 B TIONS & SYMBOLS SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE Xc e n g u l a r 029162 y® CINGULAR WIRELESS a7; :}/07 15=..EC FOR 701,x.,; , . - CLOUGH HARBOUR& ASSOCIATES LLP SITE NO. CV 340 A 57C S-'EPr ERC ELN WIRELESS _,BERT" PLAZA �W� CONSIhUCiI:�p, ICU " ` 03/29/07 'SS.ED FOR ZGYNC. tM rce ^. �•/�f/f„ L,,LFO :OR 70)11,04 v.., i- -AR 10800 S- an.Rmmr V A15470B�iG,n.i. S�d¢3�3 Frchm"nd VA :�, 75-0i0C L G 1.R0ZE- `/A 2.. JL �. 5'��' GLEN �ti .Y `),�--', _ _ �J`� g/ �YS �" 1 NNN !`, C:: C J. FYS f' EJ - C Canx ', CA_E AS SHOWN IESIGNcJ B.. F,M DRAWN el JRM pp,, w478 Z-4 1 CV 340 A. -G iAan,801)M3 w.,�.d..9nn�ao�I w", C.HA JG3 «. 14307-1038- 6G ALLEN. VA 2306., ((� .J .0 O s CONCRETE PIER t` 12" �I BECHTEL SC: I MTS PN: W940010 I WBK2108 BOARD FEr NOTES: 1. WHEN USING COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS, MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE SECTION OF BRIDGE CHANNEL SHALL BE 9 FEET FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL. 2. WHEN USING COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS, THE SPLICE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT, IF POSSIBLE, OR AT A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. 3. WHEN USING COMPONENTS, SUPPORT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS OF ICE BRIDGES, WITH A MAXIMUM CANTILEVER DISTANCE OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. 4 CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WITH A MATERIAL TO RESTORE THESE EDGES TO THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL, OR EQUIVALENT, FINISH. 5. ICE BRIDGES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COMPONENTS FROM OTHER MANUFACTURERS, PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED - 6. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE PERMITTED WITH THE RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S APPROVAL. 7. DEVIATIONS FROM ICE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL. B, THE DESIGN IS BASED ON ASCE 7-98, 3 SECOND GUST WIND SPEED OF 110 MPH, EXPOSURE C, ELEVATION AT GRADE, 9. THIS DESIGN IS BASED ON 24" WIDE ICE BRIDGE AND (12) 1 5/8" DIA COAX CABLES AND MAX POST SUPPDRI SPACING OF 10'-0'• 24" X 10' ICE BRIDGE W/ BURIAL POST DETAIL 155A NTS CORRECT METHODS OF TREE FENCING so 00 TRIANGULAR BOARD FENCE NCE CORRECT TRUNK ARMORING Iwo ®Q lZ p 0 II 29162 ,/ C+t4c.,- CLOUGH HARBOUR dASSOCIATES LLP +G9(A M11�`a:A.a^, T�nC�Ve, ih< W,nchesler 9��amg, Soo N;,Rch—d VA 212753]40 Man (803189]35& m.^n rJougMa2wr mm CHA .:08 ' 3O�-1G36-1601 SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A F70 Sr,FPHFR, Ri"; p; C,POZE? VA 2_G3� CUT PCST LENGTH TO SUIT BY S' 8 NAL s,2'1® 4 �% CINGULAR WIRELESS CkA'h M1'G t BABE^ PEv 2L7ti2-421 VA -CV 3 i, -G6 2 REMOVING UNCAPPED Ern AND 3?/! 3/07 ,LED FO- ZvP.^G ,C= '.Y!.. he FENCING AND ARMORING 0'/11/07 ;SUED FGR _OMN. vJO V", w�_� 'Al DAT: fiE`J'SIO�iS rY Cnif PP' RECAP [BECHTEL PN W13400101 24"T ICE BRIDGE CUICE CHANNEL BRIDGE CHANNEL LENGTH TO SUIT (SEE NOTES) 0 oa Ohpp TRAPEZE KIT (3) TRAPEZE KITS ARE I \ Z 3 INCLUDED WITH IN ICE BRIDGE. a oNOTE: ANTENNA CABLES ARRANGEMENT ALL COMPONENTS AND BY CONTRACTOR SUPPORTS, INCLUDING CONCRETE, DRIP LINE z TO BE PAINTED OR COLORED TO 111 _0 o j MATCH MONOPOLE BROWN COLORING cD ZEi SNOW FENCE O s CONCRETE PIER t` 12" �I BECHTEL SC: I MTS PN: W940010 I WBK2108 BOARD FEr NOTES: 1. WHEN USING COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAILS, MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A CONTINUOUS SINGLE SECTION OF BRIDGE CHANNEL SHALL BE 9 FEET FOR 10 FEET BRIDGE CHANNEL. 2. WHEN USING COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS, THE SPLICE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT, IF POSSIBLE, OR AT A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. 3. WHEN USING COMPONENTS, SUPPORT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS OF ICE BRIDGES, WITH A MAXIMUM CANTILEVER DISTANCE OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. 4 CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WITH A MATERIAL TO RESTORE THESE EDGES TO THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL, OR EQUIVALENT, FINISH. 5. ICE BRIDGES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH COMPONENTS FROM OTHER MANUFACTURERS, PROVIDED THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED - 6. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE PERMITTED WITH THE RESPECTIVE MANUFACTURER'S APPROVAL. 7. DEVIATIONS FROM ICE BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL. B, THE DESIGN IS BASED ON ASCE 7-98, 3 SECOND GUST WIND SPEED OF 110 MPH, EXPOSURE C, ELEVATION AT GRADE, 9. THIS DESIGN IS BASED ON 24" WIDE ICE BRIDGE AND (12) 1 5/8" DIA COAX CABLES AND MAX POST SUPPDRI SPACING OF 10'-0'• 24" X 10' ICE BRIDGE W/ BURIAL POST DETAIL 155A NTS CORRECT METHODS OF TREE FENCING so 00 TRIANGULAR BOARD FENCE NCE CORRECT TRUNK ARMORING Iwo ®Q lZ p 0 II 29162 ,/ C+t4c.,- CLOUGH HARBOUR dASSOCIATES LLP +G9(A M11�`a:A.a^, T�nC�Ve, ih< W,nchesler 9��amg, Soo N;,Rch—d VA 212753]40 Man (803189]35& m.^n rJougMa2wr mm CHA .:08 ' 3O�-1G36-1601 SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A F70 Sr,FPHFR, Ri"; p; C,POZE? VA 2_G3� Xcingular WIRELESS .JEFF.TY P A.Lr i '�'ZD'i l.vh '()nom S.I :" OG'.: GL EN At -LEN, V^ 23Cei' S' 8 NAL s,2'1® 4 �% CINGULAR WIRELESS CkA'h M1'G t BABE^ PEv 2L7ti2-421 VA -CV 3 i, -G6 2 3?/! 3/07 ,LED FO- ZvP.^G ,C= '.Y!.. he �_; s 07 Du:o FDP ZGN,Nc :y- w,R ° J 0'/11/07 ;SUED FGR _OMN. vJO V", w�_� 'Al DAT: fiE`J'SIO�iS rY Cnif PP' •A!E' AS KNOWN DES.G v 2Y JRM Cn4y1+: 9" JFv ,, PROJECT NARRATIVE 1, PROJECT NARRATIVE THIS PROJECT WILL INSTALL ONE 12'-O"x16'=0' EQUPMENT 'LATFORM WITH EQUIPMENT CABINETS AND ONE STEEL MONOPOLE, 10' ABOVE REFERENCE TREE, AT NEW TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. ASSOCIATED POWER AND TELEPHONE CIRCUITS WILL BE ADDED WITHIN THE SITE. ESTIMATED DISTURBED AREA = 4045 S.F. 2. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: THE SITE CONSISTS OF SLOPING WOODED LAND. 3. ADJACENT AREAS. ADJACENT AREAS CONSIST OF RURAL AREAS. 4. OFF-SITE AREAS NO OFF-SITE AREAS WILL BE USED. 5. SOILS: SOIL INFORMATION WILL BE DEVELOPED DURING FOUNDATION DESIGN 6. CRITICAL AREAS: THE SITE SLOPES DOWN TO THE SOUTHEAST. IT IS HEAVILY WOODED WITH GOOD GROUND COVER. 7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE: A SILT FENCE WILL BE THE PRINCIPAL E&SC MEASURE ON THE SITE, OTHER MEASURES MAY BE TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR OR DIRECTED BY ALBEMARLE COUNTY IF UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS DEVELOP, A. CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES: SILT FENCE BARRIER - 3,05 SILT FENCE BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN SLOPE OF AREAS WITH MINIMAL GRADES TO FILTER SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF FROM SHEET FLOW AND ALSO USED AS TREE PROTECTION. INSTALLATION WILL OCCUR PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. B VEGETATIVE PRACTICES TEMPORARY SEEDING - 3.31 ALL DENUDED AREAS WHICH WILL BE LEFT DORMANT FOR MORE THEN 7 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH FAST GERMINATING TEMPORARY VEGETATION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING GRADING. SELECTION OF SEED MIXTURE SHALL DEPEND ON THE TIME OF YEAR THAT IT IS APPLIED, AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND CONTROL HANDBOOK. TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION - 3.38 TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE USED TO ENSURE THE SURVIVAL OF DESIRABLE TREES. C. MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: 1, CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WILL BE LIMITED TO ACCESS ROADS AND AREAS TO BE GRADED, ALL TRAFFIC WILL BE S PROHIBITED FROM CROSSING DRAINAGE SWALES EXCEPT WHERE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY, 2. CONSTRUCTION WILL BE SEQUENCED SO THAT GRADING SEPARATIONS CAN BEGIN AND END AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. 3. THE AMOUNT OF AREA DISTURBED SHALL BE MINIMIZED AT ANY ONE TIME NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ADDITIONAL LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. 4. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER STABILIZATION WILL FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING, ALL STABILIZATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH E&S HANDBOOK AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY. 5. AREAS NOT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES. 6. THE JOB SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES 7. AFTER ACHIEVING ADEQUATE STABILIZATION, THE TEMPORARY E&S CONTROLS WILL BE CLEANED UP AND REMOVED NO E&S MEASURES CAN BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY INSPECTOR 8. TREE PROTECTION. TREE PROTECTION AND APPROPRIATE WORK PRACTICES SHALL BE USED TO ENSURE THAT ONLY THOSE TREES DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL ARE ADVERSELY IMPACTED, REGARDLESS OF THEIR DISTANCE FROM THE FACILITY C I A AVSITE cxv C LOUGH HARBOUR dASSOCIATES LLP 10000 SuC 303 T,c The 322SterB-ritl,ry, Su IYl9,ft pih M,VA2327SWB Maln iawle9�owa .,ww ciou9nharww[axr C^;A JOB 1 4307— 107 8— ; b01 47 � 1 ®,���®���®� CINGULAR WIRELESS RCE PR'OTL-_'ION, SE E'IM'_it''T ERCS:ON, QfdTPCL PLAN DRAWING NU08ER REV 24752—L2 ',P—CV 34() A -06A 2.. 2 C7; i3/Ci S.iE' =0R 301,N KC 'NLP K= 03/29/37 !CSuEw OR ZGNNG ENT KLR KS '�,�c' iSs�EC ro: 201ANI, N,,o w,_R YLR NO okT REVISIONS BY C4K.',PP• ® F1� C I A AVSITE cxv C LOUGH HARBOUR dASSOCIATES LLP 10000 SuC 303 T,c The 322SterB-ritl,ry, Su IYl9,ft pih M,VA2327SWB Maln iawle9�owa .,ww ciou9nharww[axr C^;A JOB 1 4307— 107 8— ; b01 NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A 57� S,.FP;HEPC RU!,I V 22 CRGZcI, `�S� Xcingular WIRELESS LIBERTY='.A'i- 1 L80S '..0'1- ROAi;. SUITE 30C GLEN ALLEN. VA 2306C' ®,���®���®� CINGULAR WIRELESS RCE PR'OTL-_'ION, SE E'IM'_it''T ERCS:ON, QfdTPCL PLAN DRAWING NU08ER REV 24752—L2 ',P—CV 34() A -06A 2.. 2 C7; i3/Ci S.iE' =0R 301,N KC 'NLP K= 03/29/37 !CSuEw OR ZGNNG ENT KLR KS '�,�c' iSs�EC ro: 201ANI, N,,o w,_R YLR NO okT REVISIONS BY C4K.',PP• GALE AS 510Wti }:SIGNED B` Ji2N D�A'NY 3" JRN r) I i IAR EXISTING PINE TREES TO BE REMO IXED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/ \ L OCA 7701V OF j SIL T FENCE— — EX/STING P/NE"'" T 7REES TO SE _ REMOVED —IFMPORARY TREE — II ' j PROTECTION FENCING (TYP.) `.. KK j PERMANENT TREE `f ILL I PROTEC77ON FENCING jj -�- 1 I_OHF - - OHE — _ — — OHE - — _ _ OHE — — - J OHE -- \ OHE OHE f — OHE — EXIST7NG _ HARO!`YDOD TREES W77NIN LEASE AREA / TO REMAIN RR., BASEMAP NOTES — 1. BASEMAP INFORMATION BASED UPON A SITE VISIT CONDUCTED BY CLOUGH HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES ON 10/19/06 AND A SURVEY BY TIMMONS GROUP DATED 11/22/06. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION MAL, N.JR'H FULL SCALE 1"=S'-0" B 0 8 16 FT HALF SCALE 1"=16'-0" THE FOLLOWING IS THE GENERAL SEQUENCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION TO BE FOLLOWED IN ORDER TO PUT THE PROPOSED SEDIMENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN PLACE, 1 THE OWNER SHALL GIVE THE COUNTY INSPECTOR 24 HOURS NOTIFICATION TO SCHEDULE AN ON—SITE PRE—CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, 2. STAKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 3. CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 4. LIMIT DISTURBANCE TO MINIMUM NECESSARY TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION AND PROVIDE S7ABILIZATIDN FOR DENUDED AREAS AS REQUIRED OR DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. S. CONSTRUCT ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANS. 6. STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY SEEDING 7 UPON COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING, PROCEED WIFH CONSTRUCTION. 8. AFTER CONSTRUCTION AREAS ARE STABILIZED. FINISH GRADE AND SPREAD GRAVEL IN THE SITE AREA SILT FENCE IS NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE COUNTY INSPECTOR 9. MAINTAIN ALL SEDIMENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS IDENTIFIED CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE (WITHOUT WIRE SUPPORT) SET ]HE STAKES. 6' MAX..j i FLOW �i l l- 3. STAPLE FILTER MATERIAL TO STAKES AND EXTEND IT INTO THE TRENCH, 2 EXCAVATE A 4" X 4" TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE UNE OF STAKES. FLC 4. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOIL !TT—,Ll—l— SHEET FLOW INSTALLATION 17—,71-11— PERSPECTIVE -111-PERSPECTIVE VIEW) 3' MAX 1 I I I A A ITfi,fff=�--- =� POINTS A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINT B. DRAINAGEWAY INSTALLATION ( FRONT ELEVATION ) EROSION CONTROL DETAIL AI.TH OF NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A 570 $f-,EPHERD PU,", '- CPGZET, '!F` 22932 XC ingular wlaeLess LIBER': =`�l^ L. Ll- 4$5I CD); RiJAD, SJ IE jG% GLEN ALLEN, Vti 230G0 ^^ 1 47 T' AL ' 000000®®4® LINGULAR WIRELESS T^ __ PR,^`:rn,�;�,, SLDI'ItiIT - �- &AFROS'. I, CON -=C, 0!U'NNC ":UNA,ER RCf 247$2--421 VA -GV 34 (j A—D6B 3 1 - _129162 c+t4r_s” CLOUGHHARBOUR BASSOCWT .,8,LLF 1G,,-Sol11303 T,&p d, A23235-47CBunti ng S�nio 3G3. R,�hrwnE, VAVg13 ]CO u,� lewtae�asea � ,„„„. �„9nla�tw,� GHA jOIJ' 14307-1038-1601 NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A 570 $f-,EPHERD PU,", '- CPGZET, '!F` 22932 XC ingular wlaeLess LIBER': =`�l^ L. Ll- 4$5I CD); RiJAD, SJ IE jG% GLEN ALLEN, Vti 230G0 ^^ J ^7,�IF/G7 ',55�ED cGR 20'J�I.0Cc G;/„;G..,.;,E FOR G;,N, 7 03/25j07 SSUEG FOR ZGNING C G`/I:/0/ ISSUEC FOR 20VIN;= VG. LATE P.E`��5'JNc CASE. A, SHOWN DESIGNED BY. JRM Re W..SITE �P �, K� EMi NLR K9 IA,;C 'h�R W,R BY CHK 'P CRAW, 9Y. SRN AL ' 000000®®4® LINGULAR WIRELESS T^ __ PR,^`:rn,�;�,, SLDI'ItiIT - �- &AFROS'. I, CON -=C, 0!U'NNC ":UNA,ER RCf 247$2--421 VA -GV 34 (j A—D6B 3 A ANTENNA AND COAX CABLE SCHEDULE TAGS SECTOR ANTENNA TYPE ANTENNA SERIAL MECH DOWN— AZIMUTH ANTENNA CABLE COAXIAL CABLE TOP JUMPER BOTTOM JUMPER COLOR CODE GMA TYPE DC BLOCK Y/N RAC CTR TIP HEIGHT 2 NUMBER TILT LENGTH (*} Al i ANDREW ADFD18200-09OB—X 0' 0' 63'1 65'1 80'1 ANDREWS (6') 1/2"0 (6') 1/2"0 1 GREEN STRIPE RX 1900"—F (x2) N (51.6"X12.1"X4.5) 5/8" (x4) LDF4P SF B1 2 ANDREWADFD 18200908—X 0' 120' 631 65'1 80'1 ANDREWS (6') 1/2"D (6') 1/2"s 1 BLUE STRIPE RX 19001—F (x2) N (51.6"X12.1"X4.5") 1 5/8" (x4) LDF4P SF C1 3 ADFD1820909OB—X 0' 240' 631 65'1 80'1 ANDREWS (6') 1/2"0 (6') 1/2'0 1 WHITE STRIPE RX 19001—F (x2) N (SEW L6AX14R1 X4-5") 1 5/B" (x4) LDF4P SF GPS — — _ - — _ _ ANDREWS 1 PURPLE STRIPE RX 190DI—F _ (*) COAX LENGTH INCREASED BY 10% BASED ON RF ENGINEERING DESIGN INFORMATION PROVIDED 1/5/07. NOTES: 1. ACTUAL LENGTHS SHALL BE DETERMINED PER SITE CONDITION BY SUBCONTRACTOR. 2. THE DESIGN IS BASED ON RF DATA SHEETS, SIGNED AND APPROVED 3. RADIO SIGNAL CABLE AND RACEWAY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC, NEPA 70), CHAPTER 8. 4, ALL SPECIFIED MATERIAL FOR EACH LOCATION *E.G., OUTDOORS, INDOORS—OCCUPIED, INDOORS—UNOCCUPIED, PLENUMS, RISER SHAFTS, ETC.) SHALL BE APPROVED, LISTED, OR LABELED AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC. 5. RADIO SIGNAL CABLE SHALL BE SUPPORTED AT MINIMUM OF EVERY THREE (3) FEET EXCEPT INSIDE MONOPOLES OR LATTICE TOWERS WHERE CABLE AND CONNECTOR MANUFACTURERS SUPPORT RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED. MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDED CABLE SUPPORT ACCESSORIES SHALL BE USED. 6, THE OUTDOOR CABLE SUPPORT SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN ICE SHIELD TO SUPPORT AND PROTECT ANTENNA CABLE RUNS. 7. DRIP LOOPS SHALL BE REQUIRED ON ALL OUTSIDE CABLES. CABLES SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM THE BUILDING OR OUTDOOR BTS CABINETS TO PREVENT WATER FROM ENTERING THROUGH THE COAXIAL CABLE PORT. 8. ALL FEEDER LINE AND JUMPER CONNECTORS FOR CINGULAR GSM SHALL BE CINGULAR APPROVED 7/16 DIN CABLE CONNECTORS THAT MEET IP68 STANDARDS, 9. 7/16 DIN CONNECTORS REQUIRE NO ADDITIONAL WEATHER PROOFING IN INDOOR APPLICATIONS IF INSTALLED AND TORQUED PROPERLY. IN OUTDOOR APPLICATIONS WEATHER PROOFING IS REQUIRED AND THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE SHOULD BE FOLLOWED: APPLY A "COURTESY' WRAP OF ONE LAYER OF 7 MIL THICK VINYL ELECTRICAL TAPE EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) INCH ON EACH SIDE OF THE COAX CABLE/CONNECTOR JUNCTURE. USING WEATHERPROOFING KIT APPROVED BY CABLE MANUFACTURE AND CONTRACTOR. START TAPE APPROXIMATELY 5 INCHES FROM THE CONNECTOR AND WRAP 2 INCHES TOWARD THE CONNECTOR, THEN REVERSE THE TAPE SO THAT THE STICKY SIDE IS UP, TAPE OVER THE CONNECTOR OR SURGE ARRESTOR UNTIL THREE (3) TO FOUR (4) INCHES BEYOND THE CONNECTOR AND REVERSE AGAIN WITH THE STICKY SIDE DOWN FOR ANOTHER INCH OR TWO. ADD THE BUTYL RUBBER AND FINISH WITH A FINAL LAYER OF TAPE 10. ANTENNAS SHALL BE PAINTED, WHEN REQUIRED, BY THE LANDLORD OR AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANTENNA MANUFACTURERS' SURFACE PREPARATION AND PAINTING REQUIREMENTS. 11. CABLE SHIELDS, AND TOWER CONDUITS SHALL BE GROUND AT THE TOP OF THE TOWER, WITHIN 10 FEET OF THEIR CONNECTORS, AND AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TOWER ABOUT 6 INCHES BEFORE THEY TURN TOWARD THE FACILITY. THEY SHALL BE GROUNDED AT THE MIDPOINT OF TOWERS THAT ARE BETWEEN 100 FEET AND 200 FEET HIGH, AND AT INTERVALS OF 100 FEET OR LESS ON TOWERS THAT ARE HIGHER THAN 200 FEET. 12 APPROVED GROUNDING KITS, WHICH INCLUDE GROUNDING STRAPS, SHALL BE USED TO GROUND THE COAXIAL TO GROUND THE COAXIAL CABLE SHIELDS, AND CONDUITS. THE GROUND CONDUCTORS FOR THE KITS AT THE TOP OF THE TOWER, AND IN THE MIDDLE SECTION OF THE TOWER, ARE BONDED DIRECTLY TO TOWER STEEL USING EXOTHERMIC, BOLTED, OR APPROVED CLAMP CONNECTIONS. 13, ALL RADIO SIGNAL CABLE SHALL BE LABELED PER MARKET REQUIREMENTS. 14. MHA/TMA'S TO BE INSTALLED AT TOWER TOP, SHALL BE SUPPLIED TO THE SUBCONTRACTOR (WHERE REQUIRED) AND INSTALLED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR, THE GROUND CONDUCTORS OF THE TMA MAY BE BONDED DIRECTLY TO THE TOWER STEEL USING EXOTHERMIC, BOLTED. OR APPROVED CLAMP CONNECTIONS. 15, ANTENNA FEED LINE SYSTEM SWEEP TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED AND REPORTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CINGULAR—GSM SERVICES PROJECT DOCUMENT NO.24782-000-3PS—EEYO-00001. CONTRACTOR WILL NOT ACCEPT A RADIO SIGNAL CABLE INSTALLATION WITH UNSATISFACTORY SWEEP TEST RESULTS. 16. VERTICAL CABLES, WIRING AND SIMILAR ATTACHMENTS MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE MONOPOLE'S STRUCTURE. 17. ALL ELEMENTS TO BE PAINTED BROWN TO MATCH EXISTING SURROUNDINGS. OF ®� Q RF NOTES �> > DETAIL 116 E i19�62 NTS v C CLQUGH HARBOUR &ASSOCIATES LLP 10BUO MdiNhnT,Mpke, The Wmcnes[er bukn9 Sudo 303, R,chrrand, VA 237314]00 Ham f001)60I35fi4 mv«UouphAuibovr mm GHA JOB L,--, 43G7-1G.S�-1LD1 SITE NAME: BROWNSVILLE SITE NO. CV 340 A J �� `70 SHEPHERD UN CP G�E'�, :�A 93` 22 2 Xcingular WIRELESS LIC'-,� F ! P, A7 L 48,01 COX ROAD, ��I�iiL _'�)o - G V! 2306Ci '�LtN ALLEN, CINGULAR WIRELESS 2 C7/73/' i551Ec FCR ZO;,',NC, KCF w_R •,C F„ , C3i29/�% SSU€o FDR ZON,NC EVT WLR <e D r i fD7 iSJEC F:P ZON9'<C N;C YELP WLR NC D -ITC REISIfNS o� CHK PP' ORAWiNC, NIJ✓ EF PN CAiE AS SNiJV1^, pf:51GNF0 RY SRM DRAWN AY JRM 2-".7f�2—x..21 VA—�'1 340 A—.�„ 2 5 ! zi Ate. NOTES: 1. SECTOR ORIENTATION/AZIMUTH WILL VARY FROM REGION TO REGION AND IS SITE SPECIFIC. REFER TO RF REPORT FOR EACH SITE TO DETERMINE THE ANTENNA LOCATION AND FUNCTION OF EACH TOWER SECTOR FACE, 2 THE STANDARD IS BASED ON THREE COLORED TAPES—BLUE, GREEN, AND WHITE. THESE TAPES SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE TO THE ELECTRICIAN OR CONTRACTOR ON SITE 1 USING COLOR BANDS ON THE CABLES, MARK ALL RF CABLE BY SECTOR AND CABLE NUMBER AS SHOWN ON "CABLE MARKING COLOR TABLE". 4. ALL COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3M-35 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED USING A MINIMUM OF (3) WRAPS OF TAPE AND SHALL BE NEATLY TRIMMED AND SMOOTHED OUT SO AS TO AVOID UNRAVELING. 5. ALL COLOR BANDS INSTALLED AT THE TOWER TOP SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" WIDE AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3/4" OF SPACING BETWEEN EACH COLOR. 6. ALL COLOR BANDS INSTALLED AT OR NEAR THE GROUND SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/4" WIDE. 7. ALL COLOR CODES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO ALIGN NEATLY WITH ONE ANOTHER FROM SIDE—TO—SIDE ALL RF CABLE SHALL BE MARKED AS PER CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS TABLE BELOW: CABLE MARKfNG LOCATIONS TABLE N0: TAPE TAG LOCATIONS 1. X A2 EACH TOP—JUMPER SHALL BE COLOR CODED A4 SECTOR 4831 COX f(04D, SUITE 30C GLEN A'_LLN, VA 2 30EC', WITH (1) SET OF 3" WIDE BANDS. DRAMNC N',M3_R -El 24782— 421 ��r,—'C l' 3411 A—r F 2 ALPHA, A, X EACH MAIN COAX SHALL BE COLOR CODED 2 GREEN 3 GREEN 4 GREEN WITH (1) SET OF 3" WIDE BANDS NEAR THE 2. X CABLE TOP—JUMPER CONNECTION AND WITH (1) SET 81 82 OF 3/4" WIDE COLOR BANDS JUST PRIOR TO 1 E34 SECTOR ENTERING THE BTS OR TRANSMITTER BUILDING. 3. X CABLE ENTRY PORT ON THE INTERIOR OF 2 BLUE 3 BLUE 1 4 BLUE THE SHELTER. (IF SHELTER IS USED) CABLE CABLE CABLE ALL BOTTOM JUMPERS SHALL BE COLOR 4. X Cl CODED WITH (1) SET OF 3/4" WIDE BANDS C2 SECTOR ON EACH END OF THE BOTTOM JUMPER. GAMMA, C, Z BASE OF TOWER 5. X 4 WHITE ALL BOTTOM JUMPERS SHALL BE COLOR CODED WITH (1) SET OF 3/4" WIDE BANDS ON EACH END OF THE BOTTOM JUMPER. (* — DENOTES TAG OR TAPE.) Al GAMMA, C, OR Z ALPHA, A, OR X RF CABLES RF CABLES Cl THRU C10 Al THRU A10 AS REQ'D AS REQ'D C181 BETA, B. OR Y RF CABLES B1 THRU B10 AS REO'D ANTENNA SECTOR AND CABLE DEFINITION CABLE MARKING COLOR TABLE NAME: BROWNSVILLE CABLE CABLE CABLE CABLE CLOUGH HARBOUR&ASSOCIATES LLP Al A2 A3 A4 SECTOR 4831 COX f(04D, SUITE 30C GLEN A'_LLN, VA 2 30EC', N:0 DA -E REVISIONS 8` CNK pp, SCA.E AS SHOWN! DE.S'ONEi 81 JR1V DRAWN D, ;RM DRAMNC N',M3_R -El 24782— 421 ��r,—'C l' 3411 A—r F 2 ALPHA, A, X 1 GREEN 2 GREEN 3 GREEN 4 GREEN CABLE CABLE CABLE CABLE 81 82 E33 1 E34 SECTOR BETA. B, Y 1 BLUE 2 BLUE 3 BLUE 1 4 BLUE CABLE CABLE CABLE CABLE Cl Cl C2 C2 SECTOR GAMMA, C, Z i WHITE 2 WHITE 3 WHITE 4 WHITE SECTOR ANTENNA TOP JUMPER CABLE (TYP) TMA WHERE REQ'D JUMPER CABLE (TYP) MAIN COAX (TYP) BOTTOM JUMPER CABLE (TYP) BTS EQUIPMENT CABLE MARKING LOCATIONS DIAGRAM DETAIL 66 NTS lit LT11 �f � o Li. CH z® 916A J I L 3 A NAME: BROWNSVILLE Xcingular jg�clik.SITE A t�6� jll� 7 G,113/07 :SLED F3R ZQ41' C, KCF W_R IWttR ®CINGULAR WIRELESS Dak O JR CODING CLOUGH HARBOUR&ASSOCIATES LLP SITE NO. CV 340 A 570 SHE='HERD RUN WIRELESS LIBERTY PLAZA 1 03/29/17 19SJED FOR ZON:N7, EMT W_RL L"°' 0 0'/i 1/07 ISS'JFO -DR ZWN-, MJC W'_R ®�®��� 10800 MMIONian Tu plke,The Wi 0,h w&ddmg, Suee 303. Wchrtwnd, VA 23235-4700 Mam ieaa)es7.s5st www.ao gnhadwu.mm �v HN .JOE . - 1 43117— 1 D3.R—' (jG 7 �C CZET, VA L. .:32 4831 COX f(04D, SUITE 30C GLEN A'_LLN, VA 2 30EC', N:0 DA -E REVISIONS 8` CNK pp, SCA.E AS SHOWN! DE.S'ONEi 81 JR1V DRAWN D, ;RM DRAMNC N',M3_R -El 24782— 421 ��r,—'C l' 3411 A—r F 2 J I L 3 A - - ... y4 MIC•]iAEL Z�15SER. ROMTH a t 56 35 • [ IL\.\1.5.AL 1.t • S .. J2 � I I ' \ I � \ I Rei i ,,,. 4 ,4 •,, R\\I5:\1' E'•: r S KOSTAS -1 I • �� i� � ALIBLR l IS �. ,(;;r,ti • '' . JAN�+S H L s :14#� .• t EiAMSAI' 5E93_>[3 IIGH r ' HARBOR \NNIF- fJEFFREYC1AYT0•N' i= g71R All B EtAI�LSAY . ' (: U t1:U1�1. n • ` �' , . . IVC T \L',Vl1.ORYr BALDWIN FIERRING w �_ ` ( SE -3-4E + 563-L('" .� 56,3581., i • 1 •'�+ �A I rt 36-35D i� . _.._._ - RocK�►Sk GA4 TPKE 250 250 M V $- y wTr k 56!26E y` �� ';=,6 2fiL3 i(i _'(il.k reC M O+fi—ed by Albeu, Data unty Brownsville/Ramsay Property Tier 11 Tower Office of i:scogreplilc Data Service.(GASJ. A'lapcneatedby Ty Cb—lb rs, Nis, 2007. SDP 2007 - 025 Edge of Pavement Water Features Not.:Tb. mapelementsdepietedarearapbicr-w—.t.ti—sand Attachment B -4N-- .-.ortobeconstruedorusedeselegni description. Feet Streams Parcel Boundaries (7 500s This map is for display purposes onl y. From: Jeff Baldwin [ :I_!_:' c t;a1 _ :.: ' `.c _r -:_j :- 1 .:. r Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:40 PM To: Gerald Gatobu Cc: Jeff.baldwin@hotmail.com Subject: SPD 2007-00025 CV 339, Brownsville/Ramsey Property Dear Mr.. Gatobu, I am writing in regards to the proposed development for a treetop facility on tax map 56, parcel 35B. I am an abutting property owner and I'm concerned about what this will due to the rural nature of the my property. I have also spoken with professionals in the real estate profession that info me that this could have a serious negative impact on the overall value of my property which just had the annual taxes increased almost 100-,. I have spoken with other adjoining land owners and we take issue with the potential ugliness -hat something like this may cause. There are other more appropriate locations close by, zoned differently, for something of this sort than property zoned R-1. The 40ft right of way that is Shepard Run (Private Road) is located across my property and was never intended for anythinq other than residential use. The potential of maintenance trucks up and down a narrow 40ft, one Lane drive is not appealing. There is a road maintenance agreement recorded in the clerks office in D. B. 677, p. 621. that may need to be addressed should their be a change in the zoning of the properties. Please let this serve has my written request to the Planning Commission that this development be reviewed. Should you not be the proper person to inform of my request please advise. Thank you, Jeff Baldwin 804-986-9510 Attachment C IV 1,�, 7{ Akv -^ '�\ �h'. � : 'Tv! y' . a l^X' .. _,:'�%.-,.♦- iyr • f 1 _ 110 t� �4„'Y :,'t �y,M \•.tEr” •�' .r �2, �+ >. a !<• 4h ..'+.7 +R'Il, 5 •h k1,'�.a� •":• �lfu•�`,aq +'''i7i+X/'!�" {r �� ,��,` �Xtto39 hkY •:�" y �'SR -� �'"i � .(� � � �� � �,. �',i il�� „"Th ,v�""a5�. fi''.�fit �,��'ryj/j/J/�� ,T�'!`,c���..' of ��t�"k t'.-, `t�� .� ;� ��;; ,�� � � C yi, ��� � �, �, �� �'t � ��`���� _�.:��� ����• ,�; , pr"* " :.. r _ . � •'�:b,a �€+�'�.�' � *ate �. �. 9 7i , A ,� ! f'." s's . ...,r '#1 � - �* x �� , « r.. ��.. IN 44 A 40 ir -� - �' _,. -•"�' � ^ .k . � ♦ .rr� � � •t�«'i� , �-'�''- -'°S •tom 7`: ,i � a� y _ �,�.r .e•� ... ..!% .d , s i`± .� _ � : -•► \ fi ,a,. , .. ., � �.�x�. / �+a �;. ''fit. ij .. i6 m m4� yy�y > y:qF t „ « y['� ♦ -.� �,.� r� �.`�i ♦+c -t� � �� fid'`. '.�"' hx'� a�."`"' �, � �� L � - .yy, A h� 'M ^Ik�� � �. -f i � � � �' 4 t� �y _ - ..+ '� �� ,,�+ S•.� � � ��R,ia .. rklf+ . 3�`�,'1'��" J�?► t� ,, A `'• .l�k. _ � n . mak: � .. a ..fir,. , ,,� . i ♦ ,� x. , .. ,y'.?..T»ti•..k x.. „a,� i'p,. �. tpb Attachment rptI Rf , R w( Awk� r i5 ��. "' ' ,• 'R.'� ice`, � 11 *;> 14.58 x 11. 00 in < 2 Attachment F