HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200700050 Review Comments 2007-06-19COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 229112 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project: Woodlands of Charlottesville — Minor Amendment [SDP200700051 ]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax 245 -0300]
Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC [fax (706) 357 -9101]
Plan received date: 15 May 2007
Date of comments: 19 June 2007
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Minor Amendment (SDP200700051)
1. The proposed access road needs to be submitted as a major amendment, as well as an
amendment to the stormwater management and erosion control plans.
2. There is a concern with the removal of the interparcel connection (Item #5).
3. Item #6 has already been addressed with a letter of revision.
4. For Item #4, the limits of disturbance cannot be changed with a minor amendment to the
site plan. This should be done with an amendment to the Erosion Control Plan. Please
provide an amendment to the E &S plans showing the current E &S measures in place. The
site plan amendment should indicate the trees to be removed and should be in compliance
with all planning requirements.
No
JC - IOfI yP
ftt;tNt
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 229112 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project: Woodlands of Charlottesville — Minor Amendment [SDP200700051 ]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax 245 -0300]
Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC [fax (706) 357 -9101]
Plan received date: 15 May 2007
Date of comments: 19 June 2007
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
A. Minor Amendment (SDP200700051)
1. The proposed access road needs to be submitted as a major amendment, as well as an
amendment to the stormwater management and erosion control plans.
2. There is a concern with the removal of the interparcel connection (Item #5).
3. Item #6 has already been addressed with a letter of revision.
4. For Item #4, the limits of disturbance cannot be changed with a minor amendment to the
site plan. This should be done with an amendment to the Erosion Control Plan. Please
provide an amendment to the E &S plans showing the current E &S measures in place. The
site plan amendment should indicate the trees to be removed and should be in compliance
with all planning requirements.
Application #: SDP2007 'Short R @VIEW CrOt1117 i1tS
Project Name: Woodlands of Charlottesville -Minor Amendment [Min Amendment
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
11/04/2008
Brent Nelson ARB
Approved
ARB approval is granted with the understanding, as noted on the current drawings, that the previously
proposed access road has been removed from this proposal.
06/27/2007
David Pennock Planner Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: [Scott-
I know you are anxious to proceed with the temporary construction access at the rear of the site for
the Woodlands project. As mentioned in Jonathan's comment, that change can't be considered as a
minor site plan amendment. There are no strict definitions that differentiate between what might be
considered minor versus major, but one of the key issues that is considered is potential impact on
adjoining properties. The history of this review includes extensive public input, and Bill Fritz recalls
many conversations relating to parcel connectivity, access, and visibility. Thus, both the closing of the
connection at the main entrance and the addition of the temporary access at the rear cannot be
considered as minor amendments.
My suggestion is to proceed as you have with the minor amendment - one item has already been
done as a letter of revision, the two items referenced above can be removed and considered
elsewhere, and the remaining items, including the phasing, might continue as part of the minor
amendment already in progress.
I hope that helps
Thanks,
David
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status
Reviews Comments:
02/12/2009
Elizabeth Marotta Planner Z &CD
Requested Changes
comment attacned generated as a result of copy of private agreement (reforestation plan changes)
Iforwarded to me 2/11/09
10/0112009
Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
No Objection
The repouring of the pad has raised the location of the dumpster high enough from the curbline to
meet the minimum requirements of Section 18- 4.12.19. Hydraulic calculations will be included in the
file. The typical design storm (4.0 in /hr) comes within 1ft of the dumpster's footprint. More intense
storms are likely to reach the dumpster. Any possible infrequent contact with waste will be mitigated
to some degree in the Stormwater Management pond downstream.
When copies of the plan are requested for approval, the applicant must bubble all changes that were
shown on previous _ revisions of this minor site plan amendment.
08/01/2008
Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
Requested Changes
This project has been reviewed by the engineering group in current development at Albemarle
County. A copy of the plan has been red -lined with comments and is available at the Community
Developmen Office pi -up.
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, October 01, 2009
Page 1 of 1
David E. Pennock
From:John Shepherd
Sent:Monday, July 30, 2007 2:31 PM
To:David E. Pennock
Cc:Scott Collins'
Subject: RE: Woodlands
David,
These comments address the revised phasing plan received on July 30, 2007.
I suggest these 3 additions:
The requirement regarding Phase D must be noted on the phasing plan.
Delete the note regarding the requirement that the entire street, curb to curb must be included in the
block. This is addressed by the actual phase lines.
Add the revision date.
From: David E. Pennock
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:00 PM
To: John Shepherd
Subject: Woodlands
John-
Our comments after the meeting downstairs:
Phase lines for Phase C must be tied to a boundary between features, such that all or none of any items
are included - as shown, the phase line runs in the center of an open space area, which makes the
provision of fencing, barriers, etc. to separate phases almost impossible.
Phase D must be the first phase approved, or must accompany any phases approved, as it includes
stormwater management and recreation areas for the whole project.
Parking must be sufficient to support units as they are constructed. Phase E will not be possible without
Phase F and the associated parking therein.
Any additions?
Thanks
David
7/30/2007
s u SY J AlJi
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
L i
v:ys q
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Woodlands [SDP200700051, WP0200700050]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax (434) 245 -0300]
Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC [fax (706) 357-9101]
Plan received date: 9 July 2007, 24 Aug 2007
Date of comments: 05 Sep 2007
Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp
The minor amendment (dated 7/9) and E &S amendment (dated 8/24) have been reviewed.
Engineering approval requires the following items changed or corrected:
A. Minor Amendment Plan (SDP200700051)
2. There is a concern with the removal of the interparcel connection (Item #5).
Rev]: This is still shown as being done on sheet 2 of the plaits.
3. Item #6 has already been addressed with a letter of revision.
Rev]: This appears to be Item #S on the cover sheet of the plaits, but does not
appear to be graphically shown on the plans.
4. For Item #4, the limits of disturbance cannot be changed with a minor amendment
to the site plan. This should be done with an amendment to the Erosion Control
Plan. Please provide an amendment to the E &S plans showing the current E &S
measures in place. The site plan amendment should indicate the trees to be
removed and should be in compliance with all planning requirements.
Revl: The E &S sheet on the mirror amendment should match the approved
E&S plans (or the E &S measures can be removed from the Minor
Amendment). The replanting plan should be in accord with the approved E&S
plans.
5. (Revl) Y 'DOT approval is required (plaits have been forwarded to them for
review).
B. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0200700050)
1. SWM plan is a replanting plan only. This plan may be replaced with a permanent plan in
the next 2 years or the site will be planted as shown at the end of the allotted time of use as
a temporary haul road.
Revl: There does not appear to be a Stormwater Management or Mitigation Plan
associated with this amendment. Please remove all language referring to a Stormwater
Management plan or Stream Buffer Mitigation plan. You should receive a refund of
your SWM and Mitigation fee.
mTgineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
C. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200700050)
2. Sediment trap locations do not appear to protect the site until after construction has been
completed. Both sides of sediment trap #1 require clearing, grubbing and structural till
material installed before the trap will receive the storm flows. Please redesign the
sediment trapping to protect the site before general construction begins. Suggest adding
traps to all swale locations for adequate protection prior to road clearing and construction.
Revl: Sediment trap #1 should be located in the swale below the currently proposed
trap location. As shown, diversions run uphill in the area below trap W. Placing the
trap in the swale will adequately protect areas downstream, as drainage naturally
drains to this location now. The sediment trap may be located in areas of critical slopes.
6. The diversion shown on the proposed grading lines will not work in the field unless
moved out of the way of proposed grading. Please move the diversions out of the
proposed grade change areas unless they will be part of the roadway grading, please
clarify.
Revl: At the top of'the road near the fill section, a diversion is running up hill.
Please check "sediment trap design chart" for accuracy. Bottom dimensions do not appear
correct.
Rev]: ST #4 is labeled ST #3.
9. Please update E &SC measures.
a. Currently states 2 traps and 2 basins.
b. Temporary entrance description does not match plans either. Should be
Albemarle paved construction entrance."
c. Paved construction entrance minimum dimensions are 12' x 70'.
Revl: Please graphically show the construction entrance location on the plans.
14. (Rev]) As stated in the previous letter, much of the info on the front sheet does not
apply to the minor amendment and should be removed. Please include information
applicable to this project: correct acreage, parcel, etc.
mTineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
15. (Revl) The plan should not be referred to a minor amendment of the site plan, but as
an amendment to the E &S plan. The plan should not reference amending SDP 06 -51,
but rather WPO 06 -36.
16. (Rev]) This plan calls for revising the limits of disturbance to remove fallen trees on the
plans. Please graphically specify this area on the plans.
17. (Rev]) The replanting plan does not need to be shown on the E &S amendment. If
shown on the E &S plans, please make sure it matches the replanting plan on the
approved minor amendment.
Application #: SD oft Review Comm As
Project Name: Woodlands of Charlottesville - Minor Amendment Minor Amendment
Date Completed. 06/27/2007
Reviewer. David Pennock Planner Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: SCOtt-
I I know you are anxious to proceed with the temporary construction access at the rear of the site for
the Woodlands project. As mentioned in Jonathan's comment, that change can't be considered as a
minor site plan amendment. There are no strict definitions that differentiate between what might be
considered minor versus major, but one of the key issues that is considered is potential impact on
adjoining properties. The history of this review includes extensive public input, and Bill Fritz recalls
many conversations relating to parcel connectivity, access, and visibility. Thus, both the closing of the,
Iconnection at the main entrance and the addition of the temporary access at the rear cannot be
considered as minor amendments.
PanP 1 00 County of Albemarle Printed On Friday, October 31. 2008
IMy suggestion is to proceed as you have with the minor amendment - one item has already been
done as a letter of revision, the two items referenced above can be removed and considered
elsewhere, and the remaining items, including the phasing, might continue as part of the minor
amendment already in progress.
hope that helps.
Thanks,
Da
Date D8LQ1L2Q08
Reviewer:Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD — ~— ""- - ---- —___
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:This project has been reviewed by the engineering group in current development at Albemarle
County. A copy of the plan has been red -lined with comments and is available at the Community
Developmen Office for pick -up.
PanP 1 00 County of Albemarle Printed On Friday, October 31. 2008
Application #: SDP200700051 — Shor Review Com..entS
Project Name: Woodlands of Charlottesville - Minor Amendm [Minor Amend
Date Completed: 11/04/2008
Reviewer: Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments: IARB approval is granted with the understanding, as noted on the current drawings, that the previously
proposed access road has been removed from this proposal.
Date Completed: 06/27/2007
Reviewer: David Pennock Planner Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Scott-
I know you are anxious to proceed with the temporary construction access at the rear of the site for
the Woodlands project. As mentioned in Jonathan's comment, that change can't be considered as a
minor site plan amendment. There are no strict definitions that differentiate between what might be
considered minor versus major, but one of the key issues that is considered is potential impact on
adjoining properties. The history of this review includes extensive public input, and Bill Fritz recalls
many conversations relating to parcel connectivity, access, and visibility. Thus, both the closing of the,
connection at the main entrance and the addition of the temporary access at the rear cannot be
considered as minor amendments.
My suggestion is to proceed as you have with the minor amendment - one item has already been
done as a letter of revision, the two items referenced above can be removed and considered
elsewhere, and the remaining items, including the phasing, might continue as part of the minor
amendment already in progress.
I hope that helps.
Thanks,
David
Date Completed: 08/01/2008
Reviewer: Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: jThis project has been reviewed by the engineering group in current development at Albemarle
County. A copy of the plan has been red -lined with comments and is available at the Community
IDevelopment Office for pick -up.
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On Tuesday, November 04, 2008
kW \
Illil' ycmay.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone(434)296 -5832
Project: Woodlands [SDP20070005I]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering
Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC
Plan received date: July 8, 2008
Date of comments: August 13, 2008
Reviewer: Elizabeth Marotta
Fax 972 -4126
fax (434) 245 -0300]
fax (706) 357 -9101]
The minor amendment (dated 7/3/08) has been reviewed by Current Development. In addition to
satisfying Engineering comments (red -line comments dated 8/1/08) and forthcoming comments
from other divisions, approval requires the following items changed or corrected:
A. Minor Amendment Plan (SDP200700051)
1. [Chapter 18 Section 4.12.15.g] requires curbs along the perimeter and entrance of
the parking lot adjacent to Mountain Wood Apartments. This section, as well as
Chapter 18- 4.12.2.c.2, provides provisions for a waiver. Provide curb along the
perimeter, or, submit a waiver request pursuant to the appropriate section.
2. Please clarify the lot lines in the area of the proposed redesigned parking lot; the
approved final site plan shows a lot line at the edge of the current parking lot and
the proposed plan does not show property lines in the vicinity.
Al
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax ( 434) 972 -4126
Project: Woodlands [SDP200700051]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax (434) 245 -0300]
Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC [fax (706) 357 -9101 ]
Plan received date: July 8, 2008
Date of comments: August 13, 2008
Reviewer: Elizabeth Marotta
The minor amendment (dated 7/3/08) has been reviewed by Current Development. In addition to
satisfying Engineering comments (red -line comments dated 8/1/08) and forthcoming comments
from other divisions, approval requires the following items changed or corrected:
A. Minor Amendment Plan (SDP200700051)
1. [Chapter 18 Section 4.12.15.g] requires curbs along the perimeter and entrance of
the parking lot adjacent to Mountain Wood Apartments. This section, as well as
Chapter 18- 4.12.2.c.2, provides provisions for a waiver. Provide curb along the
perimeter, or, submit a waiver request pursuant to the appropriate section.
2. Please clarify the lot lines in the area of the proposed redesigned parking lot; the
approved final site plan shows a lot line at the edge of the current parking lot and
the proposed plan does not show property lines in the vicinity.
i-li
Ph
Pvl) 7
Jeol,rt:.Idctl'
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
MEMORANDUM
TO: Elizabeth Marotta. Senior Planner
FROM: Brent Nelson
RE: Woodlands Minor Amendment, SDP 07 -51
DATE: August 18. 2008
I have reviewed the Site Plan Minor Amendment for the above referenced proposal ( Sheets 1 thru 10 received
July 8. 2008), and I have the following comments:
Issue: Grading Plan for Temporary Construction Access Road
Comments: The limits of grading and clearing, as shown on Sheet 7 Grading Plan, for Temporali• Construction
Access Road, does not correspond with what was reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board.
The plan included with this amendment shows significantly more grading and tree removal than was approved
by the ARB.
Recommendations: Revise Sheet 7 Grading Plan for Temporal -v Construction Access Road so as to match the
plan that was approved by the Architectural Review Board or make an application to the ARB for review of an
Amendment to the Site Development Plan.
1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
Project: The Woodlands Minor Amendment [SDP200700051]
Plan preparer: Scott Collins [ scottLucollins- engineering.com]
Owner or rep.: The Dovetail Companies
Plan received date: 29 October 2008
Date of comments: 2 December 2008
Reviewer: Phil Custer
Fax (434) 972 -4126
This minor amendment has been under review for more than a year. The previously submitted plans
included construction and disturbance to the TMP 76 -46B for a temporary haul road. This concept has
been abandoned at the moment and this review is only for the as -built information shown in sheets 1 -7.
Due to the change in scope of the plans and the time since the last submittal, the previous review sequence
has been abandoned. The following comments must be addressed to satisfy engineering review.
1. Please bubble all sidewalk locations and characteristics that are being amended with this plan.
2. Approval from VDOT is required. A plan has been submitted to VDOT for approval.
3. According to the provided photos, the plan for the east side of the Mountainwood apartment
parking area does not appear to match what is in the field regarding the striping and the curbing
around the flume. If this minor amendment is approved, modifications to the site will need to be
made to match the plan.
4. Please provide computations for the flume opening from the parking lot into the VDOT ditch.
5. The dumpster appears to have been sited in an area where a considerable amount of water runs
across the pad. Please provide spot elevations in the area and a computation (intensity of 4.Oin/hr)
to confirm that stormwater does not run through the dumpster area. [ 18- 4.12.19]
The Chief of Current Development has determined that curbing is not required on the north side of the
Mountainwood Apartment parking lot.
pr :vq
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
F ILe C-16N
P_,YriaJl,w, +0 fib. 3ckl h w
2/12/09
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
Project: Woodlands [SDP200700051]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax (434) 245 -0300]
Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC [fax (706) 357 -9101]
Date of comments: February 11, 2009
Reviewer: Elizabeth Marotta
The minor amendment revisions and agreement between The Dovetail Companies and Frye Properties,
Inc. (dated March 30, 2007) have been reviewed by Current Development - Planning. In addition to
satisfying Engineering comments and any comments from other divisions, approval requires the
following items changed or corrected:
A. Minor Amendment Plan (SDP200700051)
1. Per the agreement dated March30, 2007 between The Dovetail Companies and Frye
Properties, Inc., both parties agreed they do not wish to establish the "reforestation
area" as shown on the previously approved plan. Instead, "Colorado Blue or
acceptable alternate spruce trees planted on fifteen foot centers along the property
line from Mountain Wood Road to Sunset Road..." is required. Based on previously
submitted photographs and site visits, we see that this has happened. However,
because this is an amendment to remove the "reforestation area" from the approved
plans, and what is in the field must match what is on the approved plans, please add
the trees to the plan. The terms of the agreement should be reflected on the plan set
that gets approved.
9_,,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596Phone (434) 296 -5832
Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Woodlands [SDP20070005I]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax (434) 245 -0300]Owner or rep.: Woodlands of Charlottesville LLC [fax (706) 357 -9101 ]Date of comments: February 11, 2009
Reviewer: Elizabeth Marotta
The minor amendment revisions and agreement between The Dovetail Companies and Frye Properties,Inc. (dated March 30, 2007) have been reviewed by Current Development - Planning. In addition to
satisfying Engineering comments and any comments from other divisions, approval requires thefollowingitemschangedorcorrected:
A. Minor Amendment Plan (SDP200700051)
1. Per the agreement dated March30, 2007 between The Dovetail Companies and FryeProperties, Inc., both parties agreed they do not wish to establish the "reforesta ion
area" as shown on the previously approved plan. Instead, "Colora o ue or
acceptable alternate spruce trees planted on fifteen f ` nters along the propertylinefrntainWoodRoadtoSunoad..." is required. Based on previouslysubmittedphotographsandsitevisits, we see th this has hannP„Prl However,
because this is an amendment to remove the "reforestation area" from the approvedplans, and w sin the field must match on the approved plans, please } add 'the tr e. the plan. The terms oft h enamt should be reflected on the pl sthatgetsapproved.
ai,
9
I y1P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: The Woodlands Minor Amendment [SDP200700051]
Plan preparer: Scott Collins [scottGcollins- engineering.com]
Owner or rep.: The Dovetail Companies
Plan received date: 29 October 2008
Rev. 1) 6 Januarh 2009
Date of comments: 2 December 2008
Rev. 1) 11 February 2009
Reviewer: Phil Custer
Approval from VDOT is required. A plan has been submitted to VDOT for approval.
Rev. 1) VDOT approval has not yet been received.
According to the provided photos, the plan for the east side of the Mountainwood apartment
parking area does not appear to match what is in the field regarding the striping and the curbing
around the flume. If this minor amendment is approved, modifications to the site will need to be
made to match the plan.
Rev. 1) The waiver for the parking lot design has been granted. The unstriped area may only
be used as large vehicle parking.
5. The dumpster appears to have been sited in an area where a considerable amount of water runs
across the pad. Please provide spot elevations in the area and a computation (intensity of 4.Oin/hr)
to confirm that stormwater does not run through the dumpster area. [18- 4.12.19]
Rev. 1) The waiver for the drainage across the dumpster pad has not been granted The
drainage issue must be addressed before the amendment is approved.
Page 1 of 1
Elizabeth Marotta
From: Elizabeth Marotta
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:16 AM
To: 'Joseph Johnson'
Subject: RE: Planning comment
Hi Jospeh,
Hope you had a good weekend.
I see the trees on page 3, but the addition of the trees to the plans needs to be called out as part of this
amendment, and they must clearly be identified as spruce trees 15 oc per the agreement dated XX- XX -XX. Also,
the approved plans' landscaping tables must be updated. If they are not part of the amendment currently, they
must be added. The addition of these trees, even if required via private agreement, is an amendment to the
previously approved plan and thus must be clearly identified as an amendment. As I stated in my comment, what
is in the field must match what is on approved plans, and if the trees are not called out as an amendment to
previously approved plans, they will not be reviewed, considered, or approved, as part of this amendment.
Please feel free to call me with any questions.
EMM
From: Joseph Johnson [ma ilto: jjohnson @thedovetailcom pan ies.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 7:20 AM
To: Elizabeth Marotta
Subject: RE: Planning comment
I took a closer look at the minor site plan amendment under review by your office and was unclear about what
revisions we need to make. The attachment, from the minor site plan amendment, shows trees planted on 15ft
centers along our neighbor's property line. If this is not what you were asking for then please clarify so we can
make the appropriate changes.
Thanks,
Joseph M. Johnson
Dovetail Development
1550 Timothy Rd. Suite 201
Athens, GA 30606
706.357.9100 x3207
From: Elizabeth Marotta [mailto:emarotta @albemarle.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:36 AM
To: Joseph Johnson
Subject: Planning comment
Joseph,
After reviewing the agreement, please see my attached comment. I have posted it to City View, but if you so
desire, I will provide you will a hard copy in the mail. Please let me know if you need me to mail this out.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Marotta
2/17/2009
M/.
qv _
l
V,
J `
NOUNTAI Na AI
OUI
g . -
MOUNTAIN K
Acq.T. NT'
7
PER THE AGREEMENT WITH MOUNTAIN WOO APARTMENTS
HOME OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, THE PROPOSED
REFORESTATION ZONE TO BE CREATED WITH THE REMOV,
OF THE ENTRANCE ALONG MOUNTAIN WOOD ROAD WAS
NOT INSTALLED. INSTEAD, 20 ADDITIONAL PARKING
SPACES AND 3 TRAILER PARKING SPACES WERE CREATED
IN THIS AREA.
WI ' s_ - = - -- - - - - -- ` —r—
b STATE I NU TE 781
L
7
SET AI O \ SUNSET AV'
E.\ EXTENDED
Q - -- \ \ - - --C=
RETAINING WAIL
S
ZA B
D
Ge — _ — &DG6 _ ` - - ` BLD
C.7 - — ALDSe7_ —
HlDU.
6 TYPE V mm' TYPE V BLOC B BLDD.7 _
I'Li
IR BlDII7, TYPE AI
TYPE TIE V -,TYPE V TYPE4 TYPE ID \ _
i
TH 0 `
O
xon
R cowNSZ
No. 35791
I
Z
U )
N
W
V n
m
LZNH
S
W " z 3
N W X
W
C-4
BQ
Z z
a 5:
a U o3
n
A
V
N Lu 0zs a ,
F— Q
4s
Z ° ` n E:
g
W x
0
a
s
U Z
ul
E U
E
n
Z gfi
J o °on
J O$
0
U 00
g €
ns NO. y
062004 g '
swe °
1•
x20 6
as3
SDP -2007 -00051 The Wo nds Minor Amendment
Philip Custer
From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .Denunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:19 PM
To: Philip Custer
Subject: SDP - 2007 -00051 The Woodlands Minor Amendment
SDP - 2007 -00051 The Woodlands Minor Amendment
Phil,
Page 1 of 1
I reviewed the above amendment and it is fine. The drainage patterns are the same as they used to be and the
ditch is in pretty good shape.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
joel.denunzio @vdot.virgi nia.gov
2/25/2009
ILC car
Pacre 1 of 1
r
Elizabeth Marotta DU
From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .DeNunzio @VDOT.virginia.govj, ! 6Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:47 PM
To: Elizabeth Marotta
Subject: RE: SDp2007 -51 Woodlands
Elizabeth,
I don't need to review that plan again unless they are making major changes that affects the drainage to the stateroad.
Thanks
Joel
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120
joel.denunzio @vdot.virginia.gov
From: Elizabeth Marotta [mailto :emarotta @albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:25 PM
To: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E.
Subject: SDp2007 -51 Woodlands
Joel,
I have received a resubmittal of the Woodlands amendment, revisions date 9/24/09.1 see in City View your last action on this item was No Objection, dated 2/25/09.
Would you like me to forward you a copy of the revised plans? I do not anticipate any of the changes made wouldaffectyourapproval, but I wanted to give you the opportunity to see the plans if you would like.Please let me know.
Thank you,
Elizabeth M. Marotta
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle Community Development Department401McIntireRoad
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3432
9/30/2009
Elizabeth Marotta
From: Elizabeth Marotta
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:21 AM
To: 'sdoshi @dovetailcos.com'
Subject: FW: Woodlands LOR
Samir,
To clarify, the Albemarle County project number this LOR is amending is SDP2007 -51, and the final site plan I refer to in
my email below should be SDP06 -51.
Thank you,
EMM
From: Elizabeth Marotta
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:18 AM
To: 'sdoshi @dovetailcos.com'
Subject: Woodlands LOR
Samir,
To summarize our phone conversation today, in order for me to approve your LOR request (revision to SDP06 -71) please
make the following changes:
QRevise and ensure all plant species callouts /quantities are accurate and match what is drawn
2e Add existing vegetation buffer line, as is shown on approved site plan.
Add revision clouds to delineate limits of this LOR
Submit 5 full size sets and 1 11x17 set
Thank you,
Elizabeth M. Marotta
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle Community Development Department
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3432
1