Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200700129 Review Comments 2007-11-30SDP200700129 Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Ctr-Major Page 1 of 1 Summer Frederick From: Gary Whelan [gwhelan@serviceauthority.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 2:25 PM To:Summer Frederick Subject: SDP200700129 Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Ctr-Major Summer, The water is shown incorrectly. Phase 111 can be served by a sewer lateral. Gary G. M, Whelan, LS Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, VA 22911 434) 977-4511 Fax: (434) 979-0698 The ACSA has reviewed the proposed development and has determined that as of November 30, 2007 there is an adequate supply of water and/or adequate sewer capacity to serve the development. Water and/or sewer connections to the ACSA system are allotted on a first-corne, first-served basis at the time connection fees are paid. The ACSA does not reserve capacity in its system for a specific project. Approval of water and/or sewer utilities for this project does not constitute a guarantee of future service. 12/6/2007 Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District December 3, 2007 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975-0224 TO:Summer Frederick Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: Martha Jefferson - Pantops f r C A. 1 i t , I J \ f it J I/ j ` 'f/ y !i) 7 J f t s 1 J '"i t 3- i y" ic i (_.;_ ._ mil ` \, r .' 1 t r /h l Ai f1 r 1 ',t I 1 j L 1 t r lr I I N+ 1 1 r I I 7i j 2 \,, / ./,-•?) ' i / /e !/i T dr USDA United States Mural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water fir-- Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Martha Jefferson - Pantops Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loan about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 59C Myersville very stony silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Myersville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6s. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 59D Myersville very stony silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Myersville is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6s. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71C Rabun clay loan, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 12/4/07 Map Unit: 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a very low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a very low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 73D Rabun very stony clay loans, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 59C Myersville very stony silt Very limited loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 59D Myersville very stony silt Very limited Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 12/4/07 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 71 E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes, severely eroded 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes, severely eroded 73D Rabun very stony clay Very limited loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes 59C Myersville very stony silt Not hydric loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 59D Myersville very stony silt Not hydric loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric percent slopes 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes, severely eroded 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes, severely eroded 73D Rabun very stony clay Not hydric loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 3 12/4/07 59C Myersville very stony silt 1.5 loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 59D Myersville very stony silt 1.5 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes, severely eroded 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes, severely eroded 73D Rabun very stony clay 1.5 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes 59C Myersville very stony silt Moderate loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 59D Myersville very stony silt Moderate loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Moderate percent slopes 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes, severely eroded 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes, severely eroded 73D Rabun very stony clay Moderate loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 4 12/4/07 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes 59C Myersville very stony silt Moderate loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 59D Myersville very stony silt Moderate loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 High percent slopes 72C3 Rabun clay, 7 to 15 High percent slopes, severely eroded 72D3 Rabun clay, 15 to 25 High percent slopes, severely eroded 73D Rabun very stony clay High loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 5 12/4/07 e y ® " J 1'- COUNTY OF ALBEMIARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 December 6, 2007 Scott Collins Collins Engineering 800 E Jefferson Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Center — Major Amendment SDP2007 -129 Dear Mr. Collins: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Historic Preservation) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Water Protection) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by December 17, 2007. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Summer Fredenbk Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 MEMORANDUM TO:Scott Collins; Collins Engineering FROM:Summer Frederick, Senior Planner DATE:December 6, 2007 RE:Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Center - Major SDP2007 - 129 The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the above - mentioned site plan amendment when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.] Please comply with the following conditions of preliminary site plan approval: 1. All information on the Cover Sheet must accurately reflect information shown on subsequent sheets (e.g. — parking space counts, owner data, etc) 2. ARB approval required prior to final plan approval. Additional comments from the other reviewing agencies will be forwarded. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Application #:SDP2007001 Short Review Coi rents Project Name: Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Ctr - Major Minor Amendment Date Completed:11/29/2007 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:12/05/2007 Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Verify adequate fire flow is available. Date Completed:11/28/2007 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Based on plans revised October 29, 2007. Date Completed:12/05/2007 Reviewer:Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: WPO plans will be required for final approval. Date Completed:12/01/2007 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: During the ARB review of this project (ARB- 01 -07), it was indicated that the building design would match that of Building 1. Architectural elevations of the proposed larger building are required to confirm that the designs "match ". At this time, one set of architectural elevations for ARB staff review is sufficient. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, December 06, 2007 LI tr ) , Y 3 ,`\, 1 ( ) ,\ ,I \ r r i - \ L I f 1 [ : V I t \ \ J I , 'N' I , \ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1.301 Cringe Ro :;d I :iiipcper. \V'Irrprmi 22T01 vu"gi,'raDOT crqDavidS. Ekern, P.E. C) ,1 ",1 SS,CNER Decemher 4' 2007 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 2290 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments December 6` 2(X)7 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the Decemher 6` 2(07 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP -2007 -00124 Nortonsville Church of God Facility Expansion (David Pennock) Trip generation numbers need to he included with the plan. The sight distances at both entrances needs to he evaluated and shown on the plan. The speed limit is 45 mph and the corresponding sight distance is 445 feet. The sight distance lines should he shown on the plan at both entrances in accordance with the methods shown in Appendix B of the Road Design Manual. The last traffic count on route 663 in this area is from 20)3 and is 890 vehicles per day. The plan needs to show that adequate entrances and treatments are in place for these factors or will he constructed with the improvements shown on the plan. SDP - 2007 -00129 Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Center - Major (Summer Frederick) The additional 1500 square feet should generate an increase of 55 vph and 6 vph in the adjacent street peak hour. The existing private road connection off route 250 has right and Iett turn lanes and can accommodate the small increase in use. SDP - 2007 -00130 University Tire @ Pantops Shopping Center — Major (David Pennock) The amount of trips generated by the site should he around 161 vpd or 27 in the afternoon peak hour. The shopping center has adequate access from route 250 and Riverbend Drive. OOVEASOOf TRANSPORTATION fXCEILEIKE SDP - 2007 -00134 Farrell Property/Verizon Tier II PWSF — Final (Megan Yaniglos) SDP - 2007 -00135 Fox Property/Verizon Tier"' PWSF — Final (Gerald Gatobu) The applicant has been in contact with VDOT on the multiple Verizon Tower projects throughout the county. VDOT has indicated the need for adequate sight distances on all of the sites hut does not feel it to be necessary to upgrade these sites to the commercial entrance standards in order to preserve the rural nature of many of the sites. In the few cases that the entrances do not meet the sight distance requirements, the applicant has indicated they plan to propose other safety measures be taken to ensure safety. The applicant is contacting VDOT on the individual sites and each site is being addressed for safety. Each site needs to indicate if commercial site distance requirements have been met or if other measures have been or are being taken to address safety. SDP - 2007 - 00137 Rivanna Plaza — Preliminary (Patrick Lawrence) ITE trip generation numbers need to be included in the plan. Without knowing the retail uses, it is estimated that the ITE code for shopping center and daycare will generate 1843 vehicles per day with 239 occurring in the peak hour of route 29 traffic. According to VDOT's Road Design Manual, this increase in use warrants a right turn lane along the frontage of route 29. SUB - 2007 - 00358 Critical Slopes Waiver Request/Keith Curtin (David Pennock) No comments SUB - 2007 - 00382 Mosby Mountain — Waiver (Summer Frederick) No comments Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434-293-0011 cc Allan Schuck, Bill Fritz. David Benish, Juan Wade. Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall. Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti of AL 1 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 MEMORANDUM TO:Scott Collins; Collins Engineering FROM:Summer Frederick, Senior Planner DATE:March 12, 2008 RE:Pantops Martha Jefferson Medical Office Center - Major SDP2007 - 129 The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the above - mentioned site plan amendment when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.] Please comply with the following conditions of preliminary site plan approval: 1. All information on the Cover Sheet must accurately reflect information shown on subsequent sheets (e.g. — parking space counts, owner data, etc) Some information on cover sheet still not correct — tax map /parcel number, owner information, zoning, titles. Additional comments from the other reviewing agencies will be forwarded. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.