The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200700154 Review Comments 2007-01-08wL1L {.)F DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 VirginiaDOT orgDavidS. Ekern, P.E. COMMISSIONER January 8` 2007 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments January 10 2007 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the January 10` 2007 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2007 - 00150 Lane Bonner — Slope Waiver (Megan Yaniglos) This plan was not included in the package. E SDP - 2007 - 00154 ETC Building #2 Modular Laboratory Addition — Major (Patrick Lawrence) Access to the proposed lab is through private road Discovery Lane and connects to public road Lewis and Clark Drive. The increase in traffic expected from this use is minimal and the access to the state road is adequate. SDP - 2007 - 00155 Shadwell Market — Final (Summer Frederick) Right in/out access needs to be located on the entrance at route 250 and the entrance at route 22 should have a full access. What will the construction timeline he for the store? Construction on the road section is expected in the spring of 2008 but has not been verified. The truck turning diagram for fuel trucks shows the truck in opposing traffic lanes to enter the site. This may cause problems if there are vehicles in the left turn lane of route 22 and left turning movements from route 250 onto route 22 and a truck needs to get into the site. SDP - 2007 - 00157 UVA Long Term Acute Care Hospital — Preliminary (Gerald Gatobu) The plan should add trip generations numbers for the site. 0 °YEARS OF TRAP4SPORTA1 ON EXCELLENCE 1 1 J 6 2 0 0 6 There is an existing right turn lane at the proposed entrance to the site. Assuming the trip estimates are relatively low, a right turn may be all that is necessary but the numbers should be provided to determine is a left turn lane is warranted. SDP - 2007 - 00158 Vest Property/ Verizon Tier II PWSF — Final (Gerald Gatobu) The applicant has been in contact with VDOT on the multiple Verizon Tower projects throughout the county. VDOT has indicated the need for adequate sight distances on all of the sites but does not feel it to be necessary to upgrade these sites to the commercial entrance standards in order to preserve the rural nature of many of the sites. In the few cases that the entrances do not meet the sight distance requirements, the applicant has indicated they plan to propose other safety measures be taken to ensure safety. The applicant is contacting VDOT on the individual sites and each site is being addressed for safety. SUB - 2007 - 00396 Clifton Lake, Phase I Subdivision — Preliminary (David Pennock) Are there only two phases of this subdivision? If there are additional phases, they all need to be shown on a sheet. The curve on Shadwell Road that continues the road needs to be designed as a 25 mph curve with a minimum 200 foot radius. When full implementation of Chapter 527 regulations is in effect in June 2008, this plan will fall under the threshold for a TIA. The sight distance at the intersection of Shadwell Road with route 250 is limited to the east and may not have adequate sight distance; the additional traffic causes safety concerns without proper sight distance. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434-293-0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District January 22, 2007 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975 -0224 TO:Patrick Lawrence Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: ETC Bldg — Modular Lab Addition 1 4 //, , . 1/ 1 /i ,,"--... , , t 1 I N- ••••. r•,;-,',_; .,. _„, 1' 7.1 , ; -ri - --- 3 ,ti,- y '\ A i / i t . - 1 _ •••_._ 1 I / 11 . '1 : :1_ , \ \ , J I :' r1 '`,. 1 . I r, --- „ 1-•.; 11 \ j 1_, / 1 1 2 7 1 \:--'1 1 , I 1---"---.--, 491 i 1 /1 J 1 ' ', --•-• -, 7 .._1 .C ,,, 1 1 i 1 N.2_ I .L"----7Y 1 \ ' '.,:' i 1 . en, ., k -I 3 Y 1- I k i t.„„>,..:,,,Nj 1 11, j ' . 1411 s ' A 33 t 3 1 '.ti ‘ \,,, \ I I . '''',. 1 r 1 N.7 i 7 itil ',, (3,, t 1 7 -1, ft 1 '' t --/.. n, 1 7 7 _1 _ I 2/ i 7 Y" 1 I 1 i /./ 3 • ,I ' t i c _, ,.. i ei'l 1'i e 1 ii 1 ' 3. 1 7 ., 1 c r l '.” I I 7 1V--, 7; USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: ETC Bldg — Modular Lab Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Louisburg is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, deep or very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is rapid. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is FF. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Louisburg is a moderately steep to steep, deep or very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is rapid. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is FF. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 47E Louisburg sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Louisburg is a steep, deep or very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is rapid. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is FF. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Pacolet is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Pacolet is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 1/25/08 not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Wedowee is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is V. This soil is not hydric. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Very limited to 15 percent slopes 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 Very limited to 25 percent slopes 47E Louisburg sandy loam, 25 Very limited to 45 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Very limited to 15 percent slopes 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 Very limited to 25 percent slopes 47E Louisburg sandy loam, 25 Very limited to 45 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to Somewhat limited 15 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Somewhat limited 15 percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Not hydric to 15 percent slopes 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 Not hydric to 25 percent slopes 47E Louisburg sandy loam, 25 Not hydric to 45 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 1/25/08 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 1.5 to 15 percent slopes 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 1.5 to 25 percent slopes 47E Louisburg sandy loan, 25 1.5 to 45 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Moderate to 15 percent slopes 47D Louisburg sandy loam, 15 Moderate to 25 percent slopes 47E Louisburg sandy loam, 25 Moderate to 45 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Low to 15 percent slopes 47D Louisburg sandy loam. 15 Low to 25 percent slopes 47E Louisburg sandy loam, 25 Low to 45 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes l homas Jefferson S W C D 3 1/25/08 4, 1 1;=1UNi 4ki VA. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project:SDP -2007- 00154, ETC Bldg. #2 Modular Laboratory, UVA Town Center, Major Amendment to Site Plan Tax Map and Parcel # 32 — 6A Plan preparer:Eric Woolley, c/o Cox Company (434.295.7131) (fax 434.295.7540) E -mail — cricwoolley @thecoxcompany.biz Owner or rep.:University of Virginia Foundation (434.982.5304) Date received:14 December 2007 Date of Comment: 17 December 2007 Planner:Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner Site Review Committee Meeting — Room 235 - January 10, 2008 — 10:00 AM The major amendment to the approved site plan for the ETC Building #2, received on 14 December 2007, has been reviewed for presentation to the Site Review Committee meeting listed above. The Planning review for Current Development recommends approval of the major amendment to the approved site plan when the following conditions are addressed: 1. Please show any variances, proffers and list the ZMA number applicable to this development along with the owner, zoning, tax map and parcel number and present use of adjacent parcels [18 —32.5.6 (a)]. I 2. Please show on the landscape plan the maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation around the modular laboratory. [18-32.5.6 (b)] 3. There is an existing landscape buffer adjacent to the proposed modular lab with existing planting including the replacement of parking spaces lost in the location of this structure that must remain undisturbed. The plantings shown on the landscape plan within the buffer zone will require a waiver for disturbance within the buffer. [18 - 26.10.3] 4. Please show the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including: buildings maximum footprint and height) and other structures including: walkways, outdoor lighting, parking lots and other paved areas, loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, signs. [18 — 32.5.6 ( 5. Please provide a landscape plan for this project including a conservation plan, tree canopy calculations, and t "planting details. [18 32.5.6 (p)] 6. Please show details of all parking and loading areas including: typical dimensions, angle of stalls, width of aisles, specific number of spaces required and provided, and method of computation. 7. Please show on the landscape plan the maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation around the proposed modular laboratory including replacement of parking spaces lost in the location of this structure. [18 — 32.5.6 (b)] 8. As a follow up to comment #7, please note whether additional parking areas will be required to replace those impacted by the location of this facility. Final approval of the site plan amendment is subject to approvals from all agencies and departments. sir ar y,,• ro_. 4IIICr r r a County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Patrick Lawrence, Current Development Project Planner From:Phil Custer, Current Development engineering review Date:7 January 2008 Subject: ETC Building #2, Modular Laboratory addition (SDP -2007- 00154) T'he preliminary site plan for the modular laboratory addition on the ETC #2 Building site has been reviewed. Engineering review for current development can recommend approval to this preliminary plan at this time. The following items have been provided to assist the applicant in the later stages of design. 1. The addition of the modular laboratory seems to eliminate many parking spaces. If parking calculations require additional spaces, the new parking area will need to meet the design standards specified in the Site Plan Ordinance and the County Design Manual and will be subject of engineering review. It should be noted that the parking calculation should also consider the loss of the spaces that will be closed off behind a safety fence for the construction of the modular building. 2. A WPO application and fee will need to be submitted by the applicant for the review of the ESC plan. A SWM plan will not be necessary unless an additional parking area is required. 3. Please provide silt fence for the construction of the sanitary sewer line. [VESCH] 4. Please show the limits of construction on the ESC plan. [VESCH] 5. It appears as though a corner of the modular building is placed in the VEPCO easement. This matter should be solved between VEPCO and the applicant, but may affect the overall layout. Page 1 of 1 Philip Custer From: Philip Custer Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:19 AM To:Patrick Lawrence Subject: UVA- ETC Modular Lab Building Site plan revision Pat, Engineering has no objection to the preliminary plan for the minor amendment of the ETC modular building as it was submitted. However, if their parking justification memo falls short and more spaces are needed, another engineering review will be needed. Also, UVA has forwarded me an email from Dominion Power granting permission for the placement of the building in the electric line easement. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Phil 2/6/2008 cc- ibetnarie Couty Service Authrity erving • C ns rvin May 12, 2008 Mr. Eric Wooley, P.E. The Cox Company 220 East High Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: UVA Research Park: ETC Modular Lab Dear Mr. Wooley: The plan, entitled University of Virginia Research Park, ETC Building #2, dated December 4, 2007, last revised April 24, 2008, is hereby approved for construction. One set of the approved plan is enclosed for your records. Any previously approved plans are voided with this approval. This approval is for basic compliance with the General Water & Sewer Construction Specifications of the Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) and does not relieve the contractor from responsibility for his work as it relates to the plan and specifications. The ACSA requires that a copy of the approved construction plan be on the job site. The contractor is responsible for marking up a copy of the approved construction plan showing as -built information and provides this data to your client at the completion of utility installation. The final as- built plan shall be submitted in a format of one paper copy and one mylar copy. A preconstruction conference shall be scheduled with the project manager to ensure coordination and answer any questions. This will be a short meeting to review the project, materials, test methods and schedule, in order to expedite construction. Please have the proper party call me at 977 -4511 to schedule the meeting. This approval is valid for a period of 18 months from this date. If construction is not in progress at the end of this time period, the approval shall be void. The pressure for water may exceed 80 psi at some meter locations). If you have any questions, or if we can be of assistance, please give us a call at (434) 977 -4511. Sincerely, wttAJ Gary M. Whelan, L.S. Civil Engineer GMW /anw cc: Mr. Michael Stumbaugh, P.E. State Health Department Planning Department Bldg Codes & Zoning Services Soil Erosion Inspector 050601 uvaresearchparkwooley051208 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville, VA 2291 Tel (434) 977-4511 Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriiy.org