HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200700121 Review Comments 2007-09-28OF :1Lljytt __
r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax(434)972 -4126
Hans Mclnturff
Project Manager, Building Services Department
RE: SDP 2007 — 121 Greer Elementary School Addition
Dear Mr. Mclnturff,
I have reviewed your request to increase the student population at Greer Elementary from 408 to 561
students and the available parking by 24 spaces. 1 find that the parking study you have provided is well
reasoned and you have used the most conservative number. You are within the previous ordinance parking
standards but more importantly you based the increased need for parking on the number of classrooms that
are being added. I believe this is the best measure of parking need.
Therefore, the expansion proposed will require 24 additional parking.
If you have any questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
William D. Fritz, AICP
Chief of Zoning
Cc: Summer Frederick
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
AN
OFFICE OF FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Fritz, Chief of Zoning /Deputy Zoning Administrator
FROM: Hans Mclnturff, Project Manager
DATE: September 28, 2007
SUBJECT: SDP 2007- Greer Elementary School Additions: Parking Calculations
This memo is to justify the parking calculations shown on the Greer Elementary School Additions
site plan to be submitted by Timmons Engineering. In October 2007. In accord with County Zoning
Ordinance Section 18.4.12 this parking study is submitted to determine the number of spaces to be shown
on the site plan for the school addition.
The proposed addition to Greer Elementary school will increase the capacity to 561, an increase of 153
from the current capacity 408. Below are three different methods of calculation to indicate that the spaces
provided are adequate.
1) Calculations based on the multiplier from old ordinance: 1 space per 12 students
We are adding capacity for 153 divided by the old rule of one space for 12 is an addition of 13 spaces.
This is the old minimum that was used that is far too low for current staffing at an elementary school..
2) Calculations based on the number of new teaching spaces: we are adding 16 new rooms and 4
resource spaces; at one staff person per space that is 16 spaces; however at elementary school we
have student teachers, Teacher assistants and a high rate of Volunteers working with the students. So
at an assumption of 50 of the spaces have one extra "staff' person that adds another 8 for a total of 24
spaces.
3) Calculations based on the recent addition to other Elementary Schools in Albemarle County:
a) Baker Butler has 120 spaces on site for 600 students that are 1 space per five students.
To use 1 space or 5 at Greer would be 30 additional spaces. We do not recommend 30 spaces for
Greer Addition since large event parking can overflow into the adjacent parking lot for Jouett Middle
school.
Please let me know if you have questions or concerns, or if you can agree to the addition of 24 spaces at
Greer for the Greer Addition site plan. Please contact meat 975 -9340 if you have questions, comments,
or need additional information.
Copy: Frank Slinsky, Timmons
Jack Clark, RW Arc,. .cts,
Lisa Glass, County of Albemarle
0 AI,B
tI
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frank Slinsky, Timmons Group
FROM: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner
DATE: November 12, 2007
RE: Greer Elementary School Addition - Major SDP2007 -121
The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will
approve the above - mentioned site plan amendment when the following items have been
satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.]
Please comply with the following conditions of preliminary site plan approval:
1. [Sec.32.5.6a] Please include specifics of Special Use Permit approval in site
plan notes (e.g. approval date, conditions, etc). (;,'VUa ;`( jtcv
2. [Sec. 32.5.6.b, Sec. 4.12.6, Sec. 4.12.7] Please clarify total number of parking
spaces dedicated to Greer Elementary School on plan in order to ensure correct
number of parking spaces over all.
Additional comments from the other reviewing agencies will be forwarded. Please
contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional
information.
Yl\F AIHF.
lE
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Summer Frederick, Current Development Planner
From: Phil Custer, Current Development engineering review
Date: 13 November 2007
Subject: Greer Elementary School Addition, Major Amendment (SDP-2007-0012 1)
The site plan amendment for Greer Elementary School Addition has been reviewed. Engineering does not
recommend approval to the plan at this time. The following comments are provided;
1. The applicant needs to submit a WPO application and fee before a SWM and ESC review can occur.
2. Final site plan mylars cannot be signed until the WPO plan has been approved.
3. Please label the benchmark for the topography. [DM]
4. Curb and gutter will be required for all new paved areas. [18- 4.12.15g]
5. The drainage system does not appear to capture as much of the new development as possible. It
appears that close to half of the runoff may leave the site without entering the facility. Please
address. [17 -312c, 17 -315a]
6. Please provide drainage computations and profiles in accordance with Design Manual. Please also
include a pre and post development drainage area map to supplement the stormwater and drainage
calculations. [DM]
7. Construction of the outlet pipe from the SWM basin will require the trees in this area to be cleared.
Please reflect this work in the proposed treeline and the limits of construction.
8. Please show the drainage divides on the roofs of the existing and proposed building and their outlet
locations. [18- 32.5.6s]
9. All retention basins require sediment forebays for each inlet point to achieve the removal rate attributed
to them in the Virginia Stonnwater Management Handbook. [DM, VSMH]
10. The applicant must provide vehicular access to the critical points of the SWM facility (all sediment
forebays, the riser structure, and the outlet pipe). The access drive may not exceed 20% and if it
exceeds 10% the road must at least have a gravel surface. [DM]
11. The plan needs to show all necessary traffic control signs. [18- 32.7.2]
12. The entrance into the new parking lot should be a VDOT Standard. Please specify this on all sheets
which showing the grading. [18- 32.7 2]
13. The entrance to the parking lot cannot exceed 4% for the first 40ft. [18- 4.12.17]
14. The grading appears to be greater than 5% in the new parking lot. [18- 4.12.15c]
15. Please label the curb radii at the entrance of the parking lot. [DM]
16. A turnaround should be provided at the end of the new parking lot. [18- 32.7.2]
17. Engineering recommends that the applicant place a mountable curb at the entrance to the fire lane to
discourage accidental civilian use. [18- 32.7.2]
18. A walkway from the new parking lot to the main entrance of the building should be provided if there is
no other public access to the building. [18- 32.7.2]
19. The applicant should include the latest set of plan notes that are provided in the design manual.
Ell
RGiN
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
November 13, 2007
Frank Slinsky
Timmons Group
Via email: frank.slinsky@timmons.com
Via fax: 919.859.5663
RE: Greer Elementary School Addition - Major SDP2007 -121
Dear Mr. Slinsky:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above.
Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development
and other agencies, as applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer)
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (Historic Preservation)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (Water Protection)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Albemarle County Service Authority
Virginia Department of Health
Virginia Department of Transportation
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed,
and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to
identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by
the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit
in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and
one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to
each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by November 26. Failure to
submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will
resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional
information.
Sincerely,
Summer Frederick
Senior Planner
Zoning & Current Development
Application #: SD 21 Sho t Review C ,nments
Project Name:l Greer Elementary School Addition - Major M Amendment
Date Completed: 11/09/2007
Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: ENO OBJECTION.
Date Completed:11/12/2007
Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.
Verify adequate fire flow is available.
Emergency vehicle access to new gymnasium must be unobstructed and capable of supporting
vehicle weight.
Approval is subject to fiel inspection and ve J
Date Completed:11/09/2007
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated August 10, 2007.
Indicate the total number of parking spaces, existing and proposed, dedicated to Greer Elementary
School. This information is necessary in order to determine the required number of barrier -free
parking spaces.
Date Completed: 11/06/2007
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: This work is not expected to be visible from the EC; consequently, ARB review is not required.
i
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Application #: SDP 200700121 ; Short Review Cow ants
Project Name:!Gree Ele School Addition - Majo J Major A
Date Completed:11/09/2007
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:NO OBJECTION.
Date Completed:11/12/2007
Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. l
Reviews Comments:
Verify adequate fire flow is available.
Emergency vehicle access to new gymnasium must be unobstructed and capable of supporting
vehicle weight.
Approval is subject to field inspection and verificatio
Date Completed:12/13/2007
Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Increase the width of the fire lane /emergency vehicle access roadway to eighteen (18) feet.
Approval is subject to fie inspection and verification.
Date Completed:12/17/2007
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I Based on plans dated November 20, 2007
Based on the total number of parking spaces dedicated to Greer School (108), five of them must be
Reviews Comments: This work is not expected to be visible from the EC; consequently, ARB review is not required
Date Completed: 12/17/2007
Reviewer: Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Send comments to Lisa Glass in Building Services at 975 -9340
Date Completed: 02/12/2008
Reviewer: Summer Frederick Planner Z &CD
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: Latest revisions address outstanding comments. Waiting for Engineering approval.
Information /project stat sent to applica via email. Sp with Hans M via phone.
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, September 17, 2008
barrier -free. Provide one more barri - free parking - space, with its associated striped access aisle.
Date Completed:11/09/2007
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated August 10, 2007.
f parking spaces, existing and proposed, dedicated to Greer ElementaryIndicatethetotalnumberopgpgppY
School. This information is necessary in order to determine the required number of barrier -free
parking spaces.
Date Completed:11/06/2007
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: This work is not expected to be visible from the EC; consequently, ARB review is not required
Date Completed: 12/17/2007
Reviewer: Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Send comments to Lisa Glass in Building Services at 975 -9340
Date Completed: 02/12/2008
Reviewer: Summer Frederick Planner Z &CD
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: Latest revisions address outstanding comments. Waiting for Engineering approval.
Information /project stat sent to applica via email. Sp with Hans M via phone.
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, September 17, 2008
a
G C) i 4I N t C W LA L_. C .t :t (,) .t '' V1 . \ Gi IN I f`
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
VirginiaDOT.org
David S. Ekern, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
November 13` 2007
Mr. Glenn Brooks
Department of Engineering and Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments November 13 2007 site review meeting
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Below are VDOT's conunents on the Site Plans for the November 15` 2007 Site Review Committee
Meeting:
SDP - 2007 -00115 Albemarle High School Addition and Renovation -Major (Gerald Gatobu)
SDP - 2007 -00121 Greer Elementary School Addition — Major (Summer Frederick)
The additional traffic according to ITE trip generation will be an increase in ADT of 696 and
an increase in the AM peak hour by 199 trips for the two school additions.
The 2005 traffic count on route 743 at this intersection has an ADT of 26,406. The AM peak
hour traffic on Route 743 is 2577 VPD. The impact of the additional trips from the school
additions is a 2.6% increase in the ADT and a 7.7% increase in the AM peak hour.
Because the impacts of the combined additions are below the 10% threshold set in the Chapter
527 Regulations, the intersection should function adequately and no changes or improvements
will need to be made.
SDP - 2007 -00117 Bruce Property / Verizon Tier II PWSF — Final (Gerald Gatobu
SDP - 2007 -00118 Mawyer Property / Verizon Tier II PWSF — Final (Megan Yanip-los)
SDP -2007 -00119 Shelton Propertv / Verizon Tier II PWSF — Final (Patrick Lawrence)
The applicant has been in contact with VDOT on the multiple Verizon Tower projects
throughout the county. VDOT has indicated the need for adequate sight distances on all
of the sites but does not feel it to be necessary to upgrade these sites to the commercial
entrance standards in order to preserve the rural nature of many of the sites. In the few
cases that the entrances do not meet the sight distance requirements, the applicant has
indicated they plan to propose other safety measures be taken to ensure safety. The
ANU16, Alm
reA cc
TRANSPORTATION EXCELLEWE
1 9 0 6 2 0 is L
applicant is contacting VDOT on the individual sites and each site is being addressed for
safety.
Each site needs to indicate if commercial site distance requirements have been met or if
other measures have been or are being taken to address safety.
SUB - 2007 -00257 PJ Land Trust (Meman Yaniglos)
Adequate sight distance should be shown on routes 677 and 601 where the private road
intersects the state roads. The speed limit on 677 is 35 mph and a corresponding sight
distance is 390 feet. There is no resolution for a posted speed on 601 in this section so
the intersection should be evaluated for 55 mph and a 610 foot sight distance.
Information on sight distance triangles can be found in VDOT's Road Design Manual,
Appendix B.
Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you
have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the
applicants.
Sincerely,
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
VDOT Charlottesville Residency
434 - 293 -0011
cc Allan Schuck, Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell,
Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer
Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti
0 1 Nil
IL
I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Greer Elementary School Addition, Major Site Plan Amendment
SDP - 2007 - 00121, WPO- 2007 - 00098)
Plan preparer: Mr. Francis Slinsky, PE fax: 919.859.5663
Timmons Group
Owner or rep.: County of Albemarle School Board fax: 434.975.4340
Date received: Rev. 1 : 26 November 2007 (plans signed 20 November 2007)
22 October 2007 (plans signed 19 October 2007)
Date of Comment: Rev. 1: 17 December 2007
13 November 2007
Lead Engineer: Phil Custer, Engineer
The major site plan amendment for the Greer Elementary School Addition, received on 26 November
2007, has been reviewed. All preliminary site review comments have been addressed by the applicant.
However, engineering review for current development can not recommend approval to the site and water
protection plans until the following items are adequately addressed.
A. Final Site Plan comments; SDP - 2007 - 00121:
1. (Comment #19 of November 13 Letter) The applicant should include the latest set of plan
notes that are provided in the design manual.
Rev. 1) The latest design manual (August 2007) is available online. Please include
lists labeled General Construction Notes, General construction notes for Erosion and
Sediment control Plans, and General construction notes for Stormwater Management
Plants on the applicable sheets.
2. (Comment #5 of the November 13"' Letter) The drainage system does not appear to capture as
much of the new development as possible.
Rev. 1) It appears that drainage from a few areas of the site still will not be
collected into the pond. The areas that need better collection are between
stormwater structure 4 and the access path to the facility AND between stormwater
structure 30 and sediment forebay 2.
3. Please modify the grading in the parking lot so water does not pond in the corner near the fire
lane. [DM]
4. Stormwater drainage structure 4 should be traffic rated because it is anticipated that vehicles
will use this path for maintenance.
5. Stormwater structure 32 is listed as a manhole. Please correct and provide a calculation for its
throat length. [DM]
6. Please call out end - sections on all outfall pipes. [DM]
B. Stormwater Management Plan comments; WPO- 2007 - 00098:
7. Please submit a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement and $17 fee. [DM]
8. A retention basin is not an acceptable treatment facility for this site. In order for a retention
pond to maintain its high removal rate, the pond must be fed by a continual base flow or have
a watershed grew , han 10acres. It seems that a biofilter detk - on basin would be an
appropriate facility in its place. If a biofilter basin is to be used, please follow guidelines in
the county design manual and Minimum Standard 3.11 in the Virginia Stormwater
Management Handbook. [VSMH, DM]
a. Please include a detail showing a section of the SWM facility. The detail should clearly show
the 2, 10, and 100 year storm levels as well as the embankment cross section per design
manual specifications. [DM]
10. Please include a detail of the riser structure and barrel characteristics. Engineering review
reconunends that the riser be placed in the embankment. Trash racks must be provided on all
openings to the riser as well. [DM]
11. Please provide a planting plan for the stonnwater management facility. The planting plan
should be designed in accordance with Minimum Standards 3.05 in the Virginia Stormwater
Management Handbook. [VSMH, DM]
12. One foot of freeboard must be maintained during the 100 -year storm. [DM]
C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; SDP - 2007 - 00098:
13. Please show County Detail for a paved wash rack at the entrance to the construction site. This
detail can be found in the latest edition of the county design manual (August 2007). [DM]
14. Please change "city" to "county" in the first step of the construction sequence.
15. There are inadequate perimeter controls for the initial site clearing and land disturbance with
existing topography. Many of the E &S measures cannot even be installed until grading is
complete. For example, the diversion at the north end of the site cannot be constructed until
final grade is established and the silt fence at the base of the fill slope would most likely be
washed out.
The erosion and sediment control plan appears to need at least two phases.
16. The construction sequence on sheet C2.0 is a general sequence and is not specific to the steps
that need to be taken to develop this site. Please provide more specific instructions in the
sequence.
17. Please provide an Erosion and Sediment Control narrative. [VESCH, DM]
18. Please label staging area on ESC sheet. [DM]
19. Please show existing soil boundaries with labels. [DM]
20. Please show safety fence around sediment basin with signs warning of quicksand. [DM]
21. Please show dust control (DC) on the plans. [DM]
22. Please show permanent and temporary seeding (PS and TS) where applicable. [DM]
23. Diversion at the east end of the site is shown going up hill. Please correct. [VESCH]
24. A WPO bond will be computed once all comments have been addressed.
File: E2_ fmj_ _PBC_GreerElementaryAddition.doc
S
OY AIhEt
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Greer Elementary School Addition, Major Site Plan Amendment
SDP- 2007 - 00121, WPO -2007- 00098)
Plan preparer: Mr. Francis Slinsky, PE fax: 919.859.5663
Timmons Group
Owner or rep.: County of Albemarle School Board fax: 434.975.9341
Date received: Rev. 2 : 24 January 2008 (plans signed 22 January 2008)
Rev. 1: 26 November 2007 (plans signed 20 November 2007)
22 October 2007 (plans signed 19 October 2007)
Date of Comment: Rev. 2 : 4 March 2008
Rev. 1: 17 December 2007
13 November 2007
Lead Engineer: Phil Custer, Engineer
The major site plan amendment and WPO plan for the Greer Elementary School Addition, received on 24
January 2008, have been reviewed. Engineering review for current development can not recommend
approval to the site and water protection plans until the following items are adequately addressed.
A. Final Site Plan comments; SDP - 2007 - 00121:
t
1
B. Stormwater Management Plan comments; WPO- 2007 - 00098:
7. Please submit a Stonmwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement and $17 fee. [DM]
Rev. 2) The agreement has not yet been received. The fee is NOT needed.
S. A retention basin is not an acceptable treatment facility for this site. In order for a retention
pond to maintain its high removal rate, the pond must be fed by a continual base flow or have
a watershed gr, than l Oacres. It seems that a biofilter de ion basin would be an
appropriate facility in its place. If a biofilter basin is to be used, please follow guidelines in
the county design manual and Minimum Standard 3.11 in the Virginia Storinwater
Management Handbook. [VSMH, DM]
Rev. 2) The following comments have been provided regarding the biofilter facility.
a. The minimum depth of the gravel layer of the biofilter is 18 inches.
b. Please provide a sediment forebay at the outfall of structure #3. Forebays
should be sized so that their volume can hold between 0.1" to 0.25" of
the impervious area runoff. This volume counts toward the water
quality volume treated by the facility and will NOT require an
adjustment to the biofilter as proposed.
c. Please change the distance between the biofilter bed elevation to the rim of
structure 2 from 6" to 12" on the detail provided on Sheet C4.2.
10. Please include a detail of the riser structure and barrel characteristics. Engineering review
recommends that the riser be placed in the embankment. Trash racks must be provided on all
openings to the riser as well. [DM]
Rev. 2) There is some concern that the riser structure will be subject to buoyant
forces that may cause a failure at the pipe connection during the ESC phase. Please
provide a buoyancy calculation for the temporary condition in the sediment
trap /basin. Please also specify the product number for the grate to be used on
structure 2.
11. Please provide a planting plan for the storinwater management facility. The planting plan
should be designed in accordance with Minimum Standards 3.05 in the Virginia Stormwater
Management Handbook. [VSMH, DM]
Rev. 2) It appears that one more tree is required in the biofilter bed. There is also a
discrepancy on sheet L1.0 regarding the amount of Bald Cypresses proposed in the
plan. Please correct.
C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; SDP - 2007 - 00098:
15. There are inadequate perimeter controls for the initial site clearing and land disturbance with
existing topography. Many of the E &S measures cannot even be installed until grading is
complete. For example, the diversion at the north end of the site cannot be constructed until
final grade is established and the silt fence at the base of the till slope would most likely be
washed out.
The erosion and sediment control plan appears to need at least two phases.
a. (Rev. 2) The weir length of the trap measures to be 30ft rather than I8ft. Please
correct.
b. (Rev. 2) Sequence 2 of the ESC plan should show the sediment trap grading as
seen in Sequence 1.
c. (Rev. 2) Please show the eastern diversion dike in Sequence I as it appears in
Sequence 11.
d. (Rev. 2) _ ase label the diversion on the northern , r
tion of the site as a Fill
Diversion (FD).
e. (Rev. 2) Please include in the set Plate 3.13 -2 from the VESCH with all of the
pertinent elevations labeled. It appears that there is enough total volume
available in the trap, but the elevations listed are incorrect. For instance, the dry
storage elevation should be lft below the top of the embankment. Please contact
me for more clarification if needed.
L (Rev. 2) Sheet C2.1 states the maximum area to the sediment trap is 2.9 acres but
when the storm sewer is installed, the area will be at least 3.4 acres (according
the SWM calculations). Please clarify.
g. (Rev. 2) Show the construction entrance on Sequence 1 of the ESC plan.
It. (Rev. 2) In sequence I of the ESC plan, please remove the demolition designation
from the site elements that are to be saved until phase It of the building
construction. I suggest removing the hatching in this area, adding the safety
fence from sheet C1.1, and modifying the limits of construction on Sheet C2.1.
19. Please show existing soil boundaries with labels. [DM]
Rev. 2) The provided detail is acceptable. However, please relocate the soils map
into an erosion and sediment control sheet.
22. Please show permanent and temporary seeding (PS and TS) where applicable. [DM]
Rev. 2) Show temporary seeding on the soil stockpile and permanent seeding for all
areas where final grade is shown (all slopes during Phase 2 and around sediment
trap during phase 1).
24. A WPO bond will be computed once all comments have been addressed.
D. Additional WPO and site plan comments based on revisions to latest plan:
25. (Rev. 2) For all slopes steeper than 3:1, please specify a low- maintenance ground cover.
File: E3_fn j swm esc_PBC_GreerElcmentaryAddition , doc
Page 1 of 1
Philip Custer
From: Philip Custer
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:48 AM
To: Frank Slinsky; 'Blake Hall'; Lisa Glass
Cc: Summer Frederick
Subject: Engineering Comments for the Greer Elementary School Addition
Attachments: E3_fmj swm esc _PBC_GreerElementaryAddition.doc
Good morning,
Attached are the review comments for the site and WPO plan amendments for Greer Elementary School. Please
contact me should you have any questions.
Thanks,
Phil Custer
434) 296 -5832 x3072
3/4/2008
Page 1 of 1
Philip Custer
From: Philip Custer
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 9:54 AM
To: 'Frank Slinsky'
Cc: Jack Clark; Blake Hall; Summer Frederick
Subject: RE: Greer ES
Attachments: E5_fmj swm esc_ PBC_GreerElementaryAddition.doc
Good morning. The WPO plans for Greer Elementary school have been approved by Engineering. Please see
attached letter. No water protection bonds are needed because it as a county project. Copies of the plan should
be sent to me to be placed in the county file.
The site plan is not officially approved until all the agencies are again contacted and their approval verified.
Summer will contact you when this has occurred.
Thanks,
Phil
From: Frank Slinsky [mailto:Frank.Slinsky @timmons.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:07 AM
To: Philip Custer
Cc: Jack Clark; Blake Hall
Subject: Greer ES
Phil,
I left you a voice mail on the Greer ES plans. We overnighted the revised plans to you. Can you
please review and approve the WPO plans so we can submit the mylars. Summer Frederick is not
allowing this until you approve the plan. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Frank Slinsky III, P.E.
Site Development Project Manager
TIMt-IONS GROUPP
Telephone: 919 - 866 -4934
Facsimile: 919 - 859 -5663
Cell: 919 - 210 -8608
Web: www,timmons.com
5/9/2008
r
oY .1I, jj
a
IRCiN
r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project:Greer Elementary School Addition, Major Site Plan Amendment
SDP -2007- 00121, WPO -2007- 00098)
Plan preparer:Mr. Francis Slinsky, PE fax: 919.859.5663
Timmons Group
Owner or rep.:County of Albemarle School Board fax: 434.975.9341
Date received:Rev. 4: 8 May 2008 (plans signed 2 May 2008)
Rev. 3: 24 March 2008 (plans signed 21 March 2008)
Rev. 2: 24 January 2008 (plans signed 22 January 2008)
Rev. 1: 26 November 2007 (plans signed 20 November 2007)
22 October 2007 (plans signed 19 October 2007)
Date of Comment:Rev. 4: 9 May 2008
Rev. 3: 28 April 2008
Rev. 2: 4 March 2008
Rev. 1: 17 December 2007
13 November 2007
Lead Engineer:Phil Custer, Engineer
The WPO plan for the Greer Elementary School Addition, received on 8 May 2008, has been reviewed.
Engineering review for current development grants approval to the WPO plan. Please submit 4 copies of
the ESC plan and 2 copies of the SWM plan for the county inspection files. Please have each of the
sets folded.
Engineering review has no objection to the approval of the site plan.
A. Final Site Plan comments; SDP -2007 - 00121:
All comments have been addressed.
B. Stormwater Management Plan comments; WPO- 2007 - 00098:
All comments have been addressed.
C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; WPO -2007- 00098:
All comments have been addressed.
File: E5_tntj swin esc _PBC_GreerElernentatyAddition