Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800020 Review Comments 2008-01-31County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning and zoning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 Subject: Whitehouse Commercial Preliminary Site Plan (SDP200800020) critical slope waiver request The critical slope waiver request has been reviewed. The engineering analysis of the request follows: Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance: The non-exempt critical slope areas areas on this site are wooded. The applicant is proposing commercial office space, and the critical slope disturbance includes buildings, parking areas, grading, etc. Areas Total site 4.8 acres approximately Critical slopes 0.9 acres 19% of site Critical slopes disturbed 0.3 acres 33% of critical slopes Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18-4.2 is discussed: Compliance with Zoning Ordinance 18-4.2: "movement of soil and rock" Proper slope construction, control of drainage, and vegetative stabilization will prevent any movement of soil. "excessive stormwater runoff' The site drains to Luxor Stormwater Management Pond #1, which has been designed to handle the runoff from the proposed site for both Stormwater Quality and Detention. "siltation" Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will ensure long term stability. "loss of aesthetic resource" The disturbance will be visible from adjacent parcels and public roadways. "septic effluent" This site is served by public sewer. Exemptions to critical slopes waivers for driveways, roads and utilities without reasonable alternative locations: One-third of proposed critical slope disturbance is exempt (0.1 acres), as the critical slopes shown are the result of a previously approved plan (Town & County Drive Phase 11 and Olympia Drive, Car Max, Luxor, Pavilions Phase I). The remaining two-thirds of proposed critical slope disturbance are not exempt (0.2 acres). Based on the above review, Engineering recommends approval to the critical slope waiver. VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434-293-0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning and zoning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 Subject: Whitehouse Commercial Preliminary Site Plan (SDP200800020) critical slope waiver request The critical slope waiver request has been reviewed. The engineering analysis of the request follows: Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance: The non-exempt critical slope areas areas on this site are wooded. The applicant is proposing commercial office space, and the critical slope disturbance includes buildings, parking areas, grading, etc. Areas Total site 4.8 acres approximately wM a j,4 Critical slopes 0.9 acres 19% of site 39, zoo Critical slopes disturbed 0.3 acres 33% of critical slopes 13' U4X Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18-4.2 is discussed: Compliance with Zoning Ordinance 184.2: "movement of soil and rock" Proper slope construction, control of drainage, and vegetative stabilization will prevent any movement of soil. "excessive stormwater runoff' The site drains to Luxor Stormwater Management Pond #1, which has been designed to handle the runoff from the proposed site for both Stormwater Quality and Detention. "siltation" Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will ensure long term stability. "loss of aesthetic resource" The disturbance will be visible from adjacent parcels and public roadways. "septic effluent" This site is served by public sewer. Exemptions to critical slopes waivers for driveways, roads and utilities without reasonable alternative locations: One-third of proposed critical slope disturbance is exempt (0.1 acres), as the critical slopes shown are the result of a previously approved plan (Town & County Drive Phase H and Olympia Drive, Car Max, Luxor, Pavilions Phase I). The remaining two-thirds of proposed critical slope disturbance are not exempt (0.2 acres). Based on the above review, Engineering recommends approval to the critical slope waiver. v J N The critical slope waiver request has been reviewed. The engineering analysis of the request follows: Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance: The non-exempt critical slope areas areas on this site are wooded. The applicant is proposing commercial office space, and the critical slope disturbance includes buildings, parking areas, grading, etc. Areas Total site 4.8 acres approximately Critical slopes 1 tt r Critical slopes disturbed s, 33% of critical slopes �- County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning and zoning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 Subject: Whitehouse Commercial Preliminary Site Plan (SDP200800020) critical slope waiver request v J N The critical slope waiver request has been reviewed. The engineering analysis of the request follows: Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance: The non-exempt critical slope areas areas on this site are wooded. The applicant is proposing commercial office space, and the critical slope disturbance includes buildings, parking areas, grading, etc. Areas Total site 4.8 acres approximately Critical slopes 0.9 acres 19% of site Critical slopes disturbed 0.3 acres 33% of critical slopes 1 t J y Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18-4.2 is discussed: r� _T Compliance with Zoning Ordinance 18-4.2: ' "movement of soil and rock" l Proper slope construction, control of drainage, and vegetative stabilization will prevent any movement {- . .� of soil. ' "excessive stormwater runoff' The site drains to Luxor Stormwater Management Pond #1, which has been designed to handle the r, runoff from the proposed site for both Stormwater Quality and Detention. ,,siltation" Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will ensure long term stability. "loss of aesthetic resource" The disturbance will be visible from adjacent parcels and public roadways. "septic effluent" This site is served by public sewer. Exemptions to critical slopes waivers for driveways, roads and utilities without reasonable alternative locations: One-third of proposed critical slope disturbance is exempt (0.1 acres), as the critical slopes shown are the result of a previously approved plan (Town & County Drive Phase II and Olympia Drive, Car Max, Luxor, Pavilions Phase I). The remaining two-thirds of proposed critical slope disturbance are not exempt (0? acres). Based on the above review, Engineering recommends approval to the critical slope waiver County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 Subject: Whitehouse Commerical (SDP200800020) Before Engineering can recommend preliminary approval to the site plan, the following comments must be addressed: Please show sight distances at entrances. Please provide easements or letters of intent to dedicate for all offsite site work. There are three ditches shown on the previous plans that drain through the site (Olympia Drive, Rolkin Road, Pavillions Phase I). These ditches are not contained with the proposed plans and appear to drain into the site or spill over into the right-of-way. Please tie the ditches into the storm sewer system. 4. A critical slopes waiver must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to preliminary site plan approval. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 Subject: Whitehouse Commerical (SDP200800020) Before Engineering can recommend preliminary approval to the site plan, the following comments must be addressed: 1. Please show sight distances at entrances. 2. Please provide easements or letters of intent to dedicate for all offsite site work. 3. There are three ditches shown on the previous plans that drain through the site (Olympia Drive, Rolkin Road, Pavillions Phase I). These ditches are not contained with the proposed plans and appear to drain into the site or spill over into the right-of-way. Please tie the ditches into the storm sewer system. 4. A critical slopes waiver must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to preliminary site plan approval. 5. The parking garage must meet all standards of the parking ordinances. Any necessary waivers (sight distance, etc.) must be approved prior to final site plan by the Zoning Administrator. Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District February 7, 2008 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975-0224 TO: Patrick Lawrence Planning Department RE: Soils Report and Comments for. - Whitehouse Commercial L, I FE8 94, Co"M'ry DEVELOPIWENT r - O " ="2�B 23G 236 12D7 10 y: ' lei 1 79B � _ .✓ l \ n 7.0 3� uat�r` 5BE F?C '`y 7`C 4 7 1{ r / Panto Ps w�" 238 I t�J y7 71C �y 7 13D 7161 �p f / 1D G l 71D r 238 71C 71D 72C3 s. 59 � . 23®; A 71D. 7 0 71C 236 23C r> 23C ,n. 236 rn L 71C SIC 23C 71D 1 ID 23B 23B fi 7203 72D3 3� 2663 72D �.3E 72C3 g� � � RS 23C 23B V'� 59U72C3 236 � T2E' iZE z',B88 23C 236 68� ` 13E 23C v q= g3 13D t it 72C3'72,3 72C3 ; 258 7243 13r 1C �58D ir,, �l 796 I 1c 7 / a3 `\ 7>1D �C crtes.a�+%<c r 12C 12D 59Q 3 r {� SSS 23B "�'� 236 I ye: _ w;:,,. 23t^ i "nD v 1 f 13E, " 71D �\71E 7 1 D ^i33 c say J 76 71C 2 Y T 'IE 71E� j 256 J FG+ �i 58D\1 �D \ 710 '� w 71B 72B3 1 71C \ 7k5 �J - : tB 2 3E ; v v vvN 59D 71C 13 - IC 72,C 3 23B 7 72C3 r 23 USDAUnited States Natural y— Department of Resources Agriculture Conservation Service Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District 434-975-0224 Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Whitehouse Commercial Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Myersville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71 C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 2/7/08 not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 71 B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric Phomas Jetterson SWCD 2 2/7/08 Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia percent slopes Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric Map percent slopes Symbol Soil Name 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to Not hydric 1.5 15 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to percent slopes 1.5 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric 1.5 percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 1.5 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric 1.5 percent slopes Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Map Symbol Soil Name Symbol Soil Name Rating 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Moderate percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes Phomas Jetterson SWCD 3 2/7/08 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes Map 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 71 E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Moderate percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 High percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 58C Myersville silt loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes 71 B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 71 D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 High percent slopes Fhomas Jetterson SWCD 4 2/7/08 Service Aut 6rity TO: Pat Lawrence FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: February 12, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Whitehouse Commercial Site Development SDP200800020 TM 78-11 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 8 inch water line is located on site.. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. A 8 inch sewer line is located on site.. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. 9. No plans are required. X 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may/may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide plumbing fixture count to size meter. Rain garden can not go over sewer. Show water extension along Olympia Drive. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434977-4511 • Fax (434)979-0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org r� 0 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4035 Project: SDP200800020, Whitehouse Commercial Development 3 Office Buildings & Underground Parking — Site Development Plan Tax Map 78 Parcel # 11 Primary Contact: Janet miller, c/o Dominion Development Resources (434.979.8121) (fax 434.979.168 1) E-mail — jmiller((itddrya.com Date received: 28 January 2008 Date of Comment: 15 February 2008 Planner: Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner E-mail plawrence(ce;albemarle.oi-g Site Review Committee Meeting — Room 235 Thursday, February 21, 2008, 10:00 AM The current Development Planning Division of the Albemarle County Community Development Department has reviewed the above referenced site development plan received on 28 January 2008 has been reviewed for presentation to the Site Review Committee meeting listed above. The Planning division recommends approval of the site development plan upon the resolution of the following comments. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Zoning Ordinances (Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code) unless otherwise specified.] 1. [3 2.5.6 (n)J Please show the dimensions of all facilities to be added to this site including but not limited to: outdoor lighting; loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots and driveways; signs. 2. [32.5.6 (p)] Please provide a landscape plan in conformance with section 32.79. the landscaping in the buffer does not meet the requirements of Section 32.7.9 in that species, caliper sizes, and placement details are not shown, particularly in the buffer zone. The applicant must demonstrate that the criteria for granting a waiver has been met. [See 32.7.9.1 & 21.7.3 for easterly planting area] 3. It is noted that waiver requests have been received for disturbance in the buffer zone between commercial and residential zoning districts and for construction on critical slopes and are currently being evaluated for recommendation. [See 4.2.5(B) 1 for Critical slopes] 4. It appears that off-site grading easements will be required to the easterly and along westerly construction areas. Please provide easements or letters of agreement from adjoining property owners to grant temporary easements. 5. Is the western entrance to the property existing or proposed? 6. A boundary line adjustment for Tax Map and Parcels 78 — 9 and 78 — 11 must be approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. 7. Please correct the M&P# on the "Site Data Sheet" C-2 to reflect TM&P# 78 — 9. 8. Please show the maximum height of all the buildings. Buildings over 35 feet have increased setback [See Section 21.4 Height Regulations] COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4035 Project: SDP200800020, Whitehouse Commercial Development — 3 Office Buildings & Underground Parking — Site Development Plan Tax Map 78 Parcel # 11 Primary Contact: Janet miller, c/o Dominion Development Resources (434.979.8121) (fax 434.979.1681) E-mail — 'i;, ,_, *; ;; Date received: 28 January 2008 Date of Comment: 15 February 2008 Planner: Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner E-mail — plawrence@albemarle.org Site Review Committee Meeting — Room 235 Thursday, February 21,2008, 10:00 AM The current Development Planning Division of the Albemarle County Community Development Department has reviewed the above referenced site development plan received on 28 January 2008 has been reviewed for presentation to the Site Review Committee meeting listed above. The Planning division recommends approval of the site development plan upon the resolution of the following comments. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Zoning Ordinances (Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code) unless otherwise specified.] 1. [32. S. 6(a)] Please supply descriptions of all variances, special use permit conditions, and proffers, if applicable. 2. [32. S. 6 (m)] Please diagram the proposed traffic flow through the site including egress and ingress of adjoining properties. 3. [32.7.2.5] Please provide inter -parcel connectivity to adjoining properties. The aforementioned Section provides that, "The commission or the agent may require pro visionfor and/or construction oftravel lanes or driveways to serve adjoining properties. " 4. [32.5.6 (n)] Please show the dimensions of all facilities to be added to this site including but not limited to: outdoor lighting; loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots and driveways; signs. 5. [32.5.6 (p)] Please provide a landscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9. 6. [32.5.6 (q)] Please show estimated traffic generation figures for the site based upon current Virginia Department of Transportation rates. Indicate the estimated vehicles per day and direction of travel for all connections to a public road. 7. It is noted that waiver requests have been received for disturbance in the buffer zone between commercial and residential zoning districts and for construction on critical slopes and are currently being evaluated for recommendation. I��11 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4035 Project: SDP200800020, Whitehouse Commercial Development — 3 Office Buildings & Underground Parking — Site Development Plan Tax Map 78 Parcel # 11 Primary Contact: Janet miller, c/o Dominion Development Resources (434.979.8121) (fax 434.979.1681) E-mail — jmiller(kddrva.com Date received: 28 January 2008 Date of Comment: 15 February 2008 Planner: Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner E-mail — plawrence@albemarle.org Site Review Committee Meeting —Room 235 Thursday, February 21, 2008,10:00 AM The current Development Planning Division of the Albemarle County Community Development Department has reviewed the above referenced site development plan received on 28 January 2008 has been reviewed for presentation to the Site Review Committee meeting listed above. The Planning division recommends approval ofthe site development plan upon the resolution of the following comments. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Zoning Ordinances (Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code) unless otherwise specified.] 1. [32.5.6(a)] -Please suppty-descriptions-of all variances, specialise �pernu- t c if tions•, -m d rS' if applicable. {m)j-Please-diagram the proposed traffic flow through the site including egress and ingress of adjoining properCes. 3. [32.7.2.51 -Please provide -inter -parcel connectivity .to adjoining, .ThP af_oremen inn�d Section provides that; "Thec©mmission or the agent may A gwe praaa umfor.and/or constructianQitravellanes or driveways to serve adjoining properties. 4. .[32.5.6 (n)] Please show the dimensions of all facilities to be added to this site including but not limited to: outdoor lighting; loading and service areas together with the proposedpaving material types for all walks, parking lots and drive s; signs. 5. [32. S. 6 (p)] Please provid dscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9., 6. traffic gemration-€ngures- retia Department of Transportation rates: Indicate the estimated vehicles per day -and direction of m=1f r al t c ions to a Triad. 7. It is noted that waiver requests have been received for disturbance in the buffer zone between commercial and residential zoning districts and for construction on critical slopes and are currently being valuated for recommendation. r1I45 � 1� OeSA cri n VA 5-t rhe G ACA Mr, FC)( Kase 410 V r r _! (e Vial . f � 1. � •o•'.+ .. ./ ��V �.r, $ .1 �,/j,*�,...a. � Y � _ .. ie $c am c. tIRGI13lP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4035 Project: SDP200800020, Whitehouse Commercial Development — 3 Office Buildings & Underground Parking — Site Development Plan Tax Map 78 Parcel # 11 Primary Contact: Janet miller, c/o Dominion Development Resources (434.979.8121) (fax 434.979.1681) E-mail — jmiller(&ddrva.com Date received: 28 January 2008 Date of Comment: 15 February 2008 Planner: Patrick Lawrence, Senior Planner E-mail — plawrence@albemarle.org Site Review Committee Meeting —Room 235 Thursday, February 21,2008, 10:00 AM The current Development Planning Division of the Albemarle County Community Development Department has reviewed the above referenced site development plan received on 28 January 2008 has been reviewed for presentation to the Site Review Committee meeting listed above. The Planning division recommends approval of the site development plan upon the resolution of the following comments. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Zoning Ordinances (Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code) unless otherwise specified.] [32.5.6 (n)] Please show the dimensions of all facilities to be added to this site including but not limited to: outdoor lighting; loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots and driveways; signs. 2. [32.5.6 (p)] Please provide a landscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9. the landscaping in the buffer does not meet the requirements of Section 32.7.9 in that species, caliper sizes, and placement details are not shown, particularly in the buffer zone. The applicant must demonstrate that the criteria for granting a waiver has been met. [See 32.7.9 & 21.7.3 for easterly planting area] 32.7.9 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS The purpose of these requirements is to provide for the installation, preservation and maintenance of plant materials intended to: a. Insure development which is consistent with the goals of the comprehensive plan related to natural resources and with the plan's environmental and land use standards; b. Promote the public health, safety and welfare, c. Conserve energy by providing shade and wind breaks. d. Provide pervious area which helps to reduce run-off and to recharge groundwater; e. Improve air quality; f. Minimize noise, dust and glare; g. Promote traffic safety by controlling views and defining circulation patterns; h. Protect and preserve the appearance, character and value of the neighboring properties. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Sheet 2 of 2 32.7.9.1 WHEN REQUIRED Whenever a site plan is required by this chapter, a landscape plan shall be required as precedent to final site plan approval. The foregoing notwithstanding, a landscape plan shall be required as precedent to preliminary plan approval: when the impervious coverage of the site exceeds eighty (80) percent of the gross site area, or when the agent determines that due to unusual circumstances, conditions of the site or by character of the proposed use, review at the preliminary plan stage is warranted; or in any case where required by the commission. 3. It is noted that waiver requests have been received for disturbance in the buffer zone between commercial and residential zoning districts and for construction on critical slopes and are currently being evaluated for recommendation. [See 4.2.5(B) 1 for Critical slopes] 4.2.5 MODIFICATION OR WAIVER Any requirement of section 4.2 may be modified or waived in an individual case, as provided herein: b. The commission may modify or waive any requirement of section 4.2 in a particular case upon finding that: 1. Strict application of the requirements of section 4.2 would not forward the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public health, safety or welfare, or that alternatives proposed by the developer would satisfy the purposes of section 4.2 to at least an equivalent degree; 4. It appears that off-site grading easements will be required to the easterly and along westerly construction areas. Please provide easements or letters of agreement from adjoining property owners to grant temporary easements. 5. Is the western entrance to the property existing or proposed? 6. A boundary line adjustment for Tax Map and Parcels 78 — 9 and 78 — 11 must be approved and recorded prior to final site plan approval. 7. Please correct the M&P# on the "Site Data Sheet' C-2 to reflect TM&P# 78 — 9. 8. Please show the maximum height of all the buildings. Buildings over 35 feet have increased setback [Section 21.4 Height Regulations] 21.4 HEIGHT REGULATIONS Except as otherwise provided in section 4. 10, structures may be erected to a height not to exceed sixty-five (65) feet; provided that any structure exceeding thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back from any street right-of-way or single-family residential or agricultural district; in addition to minimum yard requirements, a distance of not less than two (2) feet for each one (1) foot of height in excess of thirty-five (35) feet. W" DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 David S. Ekern, P.E. VirginiaDOT.')rg COMMISSIONER February 20tH 1-007 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments February 211h, 2007 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the February 211n, 2007 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP -2008-00009 Red Hill Water System — Final (Gerald Gatobu) • Sight distance needs to be shown on the plan. • The grade from route 29 needs to be designed in accordance with the commercial entrance standard CG -1 1. Please show the entrance profile and that it is designed to the CG- I 1 standard. It looks like there will be a break in the guardrail at the location of the driveway. Appropriate end treatments need to be installed for a guardrail break. Although this plan does not include the 4" water mains, I noticed that these are proposed in the shoulder of route 29. Typically this location is not permitted for longitudinal utility installations. The applicant should contact the VDOT Charlottesville Residency office to set up a meeting on the proposed installations prior to submitting the pipe plan. All proposed work within the VDOT ROW needs to be permitted through the VDOT Charlottesville office. SDP -2008-00012 South Pantons Condominiums —Prel. (Patrick Lawrence • A pavement widening joint needs to be shown for rte. 1 140 • Drainage structure ST -813 will cause complications for future extension of the sidewalk. • Drainage easements need to be shown for pipes or structures conveying water away from the state road. • Final plans will need to include pavement and drainage calculations. f� YEA.�15 ✓1i TRAr#SPORTATtCft E�iCELEEMC£ 1 l D 6 3 0 0 6 SDP -2008-00013 Dunlora Gates-Prel. (Megan Yaniglos) • Plans need to include a vertical alignment. • Final plans need to include pavement and drainage computations. • The reduced radius on the cul-de-sac needs approval from the county and emergency services to be acceptable. SDP -2008-00014 Gentry Property /Verizon Tier II PWSF-Final • The plan shows adequate sight distance on Coles Rolling Road. SDP -2008-00015 Christian Aid MissionNerizon Tier II PWSF-Final (Gerald Gatobu) • Plan should show adequate sight distance along route 250 at driveway entrance. SDP -2008-00019 Crozet Station Phase I-Prliminary (Summer Frederick) • All phases of the project should be shown to ensure adequate access from route 240 at full build out. • The right turn lane needs to be extended at full width to the east to tie in to the construction at the bank site. • Road and drainage plans need to be included with the final plans. • Any work within the VDOT ROW needs to be permitted through the Charlottesville VDOT office. SDP -2008-00020 Whitehouse Commercial Site Dev Plan —Prel. (Patrick Lawrence) • A profile for the entrance should be shown on the plan. • ITE trip generation numbers need to be shown on the plan. SUB -2008-00022 Bellair #5 Prel. (Megan Yaniglos) • Adequate sight lines need to be shown for the connection to the state road. • It looks that Edgemont Lane may be relocated from the 25 foot road easement. Will there be a change to that road'? SUB -2008-00029 NGIC — Final (Summer Frederick) • No comments Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re -submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 10 Mar 2008 (Rev.) Subject: Whitehouse Commerical (SDP200800020) Before Engineering can recommend preliminary approval to the site plan, the following comments must be addressed: 2. Please provide easements or letters of intent to dedicate for all offsite site work. Revl: comments not addresser. 3. There are three ditches shown on the previous plans that drain through the site (Olympia Drive, Rolkin Road, Pavillions Phase I). These ditches are not contained with the proposed plans and appear to drain into the site or spill over into the right-of-way. Please tie the ditches into the storm sewer system. Rev]: comments not addressed. A critical slopes waiver must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to preliminary site plan approval. Revl: Preliminary approval pending PC action. The parking garage must meet all standards of the parking ordinances. Any necessary waivers (sight distance, etc.) must be approved prior to final site plan by the Zoning Administrator. Revl: This must be addressed prior to final site plan approval. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Current Development planning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: 31 Jan 2008 10 Mar 2008 (Rev 1) 25 Apr 2008 (Rev2) Subject: Whitehouse Commerical (SDP200800020) Before Engineering can recommend preliminary approval to the site plan, the following comments must be addressed: Please provide easements or letters of intent to dedicate for all offsite site work. Rev 1: comments not addressed. Rev2: Please provide easements or a letter of intent from TMP 78-1" for grading and TMP 78F -A for use of the Luxor Pond for SWM and ESC There are three ditches shown on the previous plans that drain through the site (Olympia Drive, Rolkin Road, Pavillions Phase 1). These ditches are not contained with the proposed plans and appear to drain into the site or spill over into the right-of-way. Please tie the ditches into the storm sewer system. Rev 1: comments not addressed. Rev2: Please address drainage from the ditch along Olympia Drive near Bldg A. A critical slopes waiver must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to preliminary site plan approval. Revl: Preliminary approval pending PC action. Rev2: I believe this project is going to the PC on May 20'x'. The parking garage must meet all standards of the parking ordinances. Any necessary waivers (sight distance, etc.) must be approved prior to final site plan by the Zoning Administrator. Revl : This must be addressed prior to final site plan approval. Rev2: This must be addressed prior to final site plan approval.