HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800035 Review Comments 2008-04-07COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229112-4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project: Old Trail Village Block 3 -Phase A [SDP200800035, WPO200800014]
Plan preparer: Collins Engineering fax 245 -0300
Owner or rep.: March Mountain Properties, LLC fax 245 -0300
Plan received date: 22 February 2008
Date of comments: 7 April 2008
Reviewer: Phil Custer
The mass grading plan for Old Trail Block 3 has been reviewed and comments have been sent in a separate
letter. The site specific erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed with this site plan and will
be considered an amendment to the mass grading plan.
A. Final Site Plan [SDP- 2008 - 000351
1. On all slopes steeper than 3:1, please specify a low - maintenance groundcover. [DM]
2. The sidewalk adjacent to the entrance to the pool parking lot from Marlbeck measures to be 4.5ft.
3. The entrances off of Claremont appear to have been reduced from 20ft to 1611. Please note that
this acceptable for alleys, but if a parking lot is designed in Phase B, a 20ft minimum width is
required.
4. Please note on the title sheet that this plan amends the downstream drainage of the approved Block
1 site plan (SDP -2007- 00144).
5. Please move street trees into the planting strip inside the ROW.
6. Please show street trees on both sides of the proposed roads. Street trees should be shown on the
plan for entire length of the roadway, not just around the Phase A portion of the block.
7. All curb inlet spreads for a storm of 4in /hr intensity must be below l Oft.
B. Stormwater Management Plan [WPO- 2008 - 000141
8. The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved.
C. Site Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 1WPO- 2008 - 000141
9. Please submit a fee of $130 for the erosion and sediment control amendment to the Block 3 mass
grading plan.
10. This ESC plan does not appear to match the mass grading plan submitted at approximately the
same time: facilities are located in the buffer; traps are shown where basins should be due to the
size of the watershed; etc. The two plans should show the same information for the initial phases
of the ESC plan. Please refer to my comment letter for the first submittal of the mass grading plan
for comments regarding ESC Phase I of the Phase 6 -Block 3 Phase A plan.
11. The existing SWM pond cannot be used as a sediment basin. Please provide an alternative design
for this area. (See comment below). Also, please remove all references to the existing SWM pond
to be used as a sediment basin.
12. Engineering review is concerned that sediment -laden water will enter into the existing SWM pond
after passing through the inlet protection provided on the plan. Engineering review recommends
installing a temporary pipe from structure 6 and outfalling into a sediment basin sized for the
Albema...— .,:aunty Community Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
entire storm sewer watershed (— 17 acres).
13. Limits of disturbance lines cannot encroach on the "Conservation /Preservation Areas" (shown in
Sheet 3 of 9) without amending the rezoning plan. The pond also has a 100ft buffer from its water
level that no tilling operation can take place in. However, temporary ESC or permanent SWM
measures will be allowed within the buffer as long as the disturbance is outside the
Conservation /Preservation Areas" as shown on the ZMA plan.
14. What is the symbol SSF? There is no mention of it in any of the sheets. If the intention of the
applicant is to provide "super silt fence" (a chain - linked fence reinforced silt fence), please note
that the use of this method is not listed in the VESCH and requires a variance from the program
authority. If you wish to leave this method in the plan set, please provide a letter requesting a
variance of the standard to Mr. Glenn Brooks. A detail of the method's installation specifications
would also be helpful. (Please also note that the wire reinforced fencing, as shown in the VESCH,
still receives the call -out "SF ".)
15. It appears that the connection from MH -2 to the sanitary sewer main could be made out of the
stream buffer if the connection point was closer to MH -7. Disturbance of the stream buffer for
public utilities is not exempt if lines could be practically relocated to outside of the stream buffer.
17- 319.13.1]
16. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved.
D. Road Plan [SDP- 2008 - 000351
17. VDOT approval is required. Comments will be forwarded to the applicant once comments have
been received.
18. The ROW of Claremont Lane measures to be 53ft, not 54ft. The planting strip measures to be 3ft
rather than 411 as shown in the roadway section.
19. The minimum planting strip allowed is 6ft. This is a requirement in both the County Code and the
Old Trail Code of Development. The horizontal placement of the sidewalks, planting strips, ROW
line, and curbing was satisfactory in the second submittal of the preliminary plan. The applicant
has since reduced the section. Please see comment #3 from my letter sent 22 January 2008. [14-
422]
20. Please show all necessary cross drains on the road profiles.
Ji l IIiIY 'r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 M1lclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone(434)296 -5832
Project:Old Trail Village Block 3 -Phase A
Plan preparer:Collins Engineering
Owner or rep.:March Mountain Properties, LLC
Plan received date:22 February 2008
REV 1: 24 April 2008
Date of comments:7 April 2008
REV l: 6 .June 2008
Reviewer:Phil Custer
REV 1: Amy Pflaum
Fax (434) 972 -1126
SDP200800035, WP0200800014]
fax 245 -0300
fax 245 -0300
The Final Site Plan for Old Trail Block 3 has been reviewed. Current Development Engineer staff will
recommend approval of this plan once the following comments have been addressed.
A. Final Site Plan ISDP- 2008 - 000351
1. On all slopes steeper than 3: I, please specify a low- maintenance groundcover. [DM]
REV 1: Sod is not an acceptable Low Maintenance Ground Cover. Please revise the note on
Sheet S2 to read "...LOW MAINTENANCE GROUND COVER, NON - GRASSED." Also,
please remove the following note at the top of Sheet S -2: 1. ALL PROPOSED AREAS WITH
SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SLOPE SHALL BE SODDED TO PREVENT EROSION.
REV 1: Comment addressed, sidewalk is now shown as 5 ft..
REV 1: Comment noted and entrance removed from plan.
REV 1: Comment addressed, note added to Title Sheet.
REV 1: Comment addressed, trees inside planting strip.
REV 1: Comment addressed, street trees shown on both sides of road.
REV 1: The spread for inlet STR -27 continues to be 10.57 ft, however, this is deemed acceptable
because the curb to crown width is 1 I ft, therefore, no overtopping is expected to occur.
B. Stormwater Management Plan IWPO- 2008 - 000141
REV l: Colmrnent noted.
Albemarle ('ounty Community Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
C. Site Erosion and Sediment Control Plan IWPO- 2008 - 000141
REV 1: Fee submitted 4/24/08.
REV l: Comment noted" new mass grading plan to match shall be submitted.
REV 1: Comment addressed, existing SWM pond is no longer being utilized as a sediment basin.
12. Engineering review is concerned that sediment -laden water will enter into the existing SWM pond
after passing through the inlet protection provided on the plan. Engineering review recommends
installing a temporary pipe from structure 6 and outtalling into a sediment basin sized for the
entire storm sewer watershed (— 17 acres).
REV 1: Block 1 will not drain to this basin, it will continue to drain through an existing
temporary pipe to the basin located behind Block 1. A temporary pipe is proposed from STR 6 to
the sediment basin so that sediment laden flow will not reach the existing SWM pond. Please add
information about this temporary pipe (size, slope, outlet protection) to the plans. It appears that
the temporary pipe may be conflicting with the location of a proposed sanitary sewer manhole. If
the 42 " pipe connecting STR 6 to the pond is to be constructed with this site plan, please show it
on Sheet E -3 and indicate that its inlet within STR 6 will be plugged until such time as the
temporary pipe is removed.
REV 1: Comment addressed.
REV 1: Comment addressed, silt fence noted as SF.
REV 1: Comment addressed, one proposed manhole has been moved out of the buffer and
disturbance has been minimized.
REV 1: Comment noted.
17. REV 1: Is there an adequate channel to convey flow from Sediment Basin 2 to the stream?
AlbemarleCounty Community Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
D. Road Plan (SDP - 2008 - 000351
REV 1: Comment noted.
REV 1: Comment addressed, Claremont Lane is not shown with a 55' ROW and 6ft planting
strips.
REV l: Comment addressed, planting strips are shown as 6ft.
REV 1: Comment addressed.
E. Mass Grading Plan IWPO- 2008 - 000141
22. The dewatering orifices are not sized to the specifications in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook.
REV 1: Using the equation in the VESCH, for a 6 -h0ur drawdown time, engineering staff is
calculating smaller orifice sizes for the sediment basins than you have shown.
23. Please provide a baffle for the eastern diversion dike into Sediment Basin 1.
REV 1: A baffle has been provided in Sediment Basin 1, however, it will not intercept the flow
from the eastern diversion dike, please revise the location of the baffle.
v Alj,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project:Old Trail Village Block 3 -Phase A
Plan preparer:Collins Engineering
Owner or rep.:March Mountain Properties, LLC
Plan received date:22 February 2008
REV 1: 24 April 2008
REV 2: 18 June 2008
Date of comments:7 April 2008
REV 1: 6 June 2008
REV 2: 18 June 2008
Reviewer:Phil Custer
REV 1: Amy Pflaum
REV 2: 18 June 2008
SDP200800035, WPO2008000141
fax 245 -0300
fax 245 -0300
The Final Site Plan for Old Trail Block 3 has been reviewed. Current Development Engineer staff will
recommend approval of this plan once the following comments have been addressed.
A. Final Site Plan [SDP- 2008 - 00035]
1. On all slopes steeper than 3:1, please specify a low- maintenance groundcover. [DM]
REV 1: Sod is not an acceptable Low Maintenance Ground Cover. Please revise the note on
Sheet S2 to read "...LOW MAINTENANCE GROUND COVER, NON - GRASSED." Also,
please remove the following note at the top of Sheet S -2: 1. ALL PROPOSED AREAS WITH
SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SLOPE SHALL BE SODDED TO PREVENT EROSION.
REV 2: Comment addressed.
REV 1: Comment addressed, sidewalk is now shown as 5 ft..
REV 1: Continent noted and entrance removed from plan.
REV l: Comment addressed, note added to Title Sheet.
REV 1: Comment addressed, trees inside planting strip.
REV 1: Comment addressed, street trees shown on both sides of road.
REV 1: The spread for inlet STR -27 continues to be 10.57 ft, however, this is deemed acceptable
because the curb to crown width is I I ft, therefore, no overtopping is expected to occur.
Albemarle County Community Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
B. Stormwater Management Plan [WPO -2008- 00014]
REV 1: Comment noted.
C. Site Erosion and Sediment Control Plan [WPO- 2008 - 00014]
REV 1: Fee submitted 4/24/08.
REV 1: Continent noted, new mass grading plan to match shall be submitted.
REV 1: Comment addressed, existing SWM pond is no longer being utilized as a sediment basin.
12. Engineering review is concerned that sediment -laden water will enter into the existing SWM pond
after passing through the inlet protection provided on the plan. Engineering review recommends
installing a temporary pipe from structure 6 and outfalling into a sediment basin sized for the
entire storm sewer watershed (— 17 acres).
REV 1: Block l will not drain to this basin, it will continue to drain through an existing
temporary pipe to the basin located behind Block 1. A temporary pipe is proposed from STR 6 to
the sediment basin so that sediment laden flow will not reach the existing SWM pond. Please add
information about this temporary pipe (size, slope, outlet protection) to the plans. It appears that
the temporary pipe may be conflicting with the location of a proposed sanitary sewer manhole. If
the 42" pipe connecting STR 6 to the pond is to be constructed with this site plan, please show it
on Sheet E -3 and indicate that its inlet within STR 6 will be plugged until such time as the
temporary pipe is removed.
REV 2: Comment addressed.
REV 1: Comment addressed.
REV 1: Comment addressed, silt fence noted as SF.
Albemarle County Community Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
REV 1: Comment addressed, one proposed manhole has been moved out of the buffer and
disturbance has been minimized.
REV 1: Comment noted.
17. REV 1: Is there an adequate channel to convey flow from Sediment Basin 2 to the stream?
REV 2: Comment addressed.
D. Road Plan [SDP - 2008 - 00035]
REV 1: Comment noted.
REV 1: Comment addressed, Claremont Lane is not shown with a 5.5' ROW and Eft planting
strips.
REV 1: Comment addressed, planting strips are shown as Eft.
REV 1: Comment addressed.
E. Mass Grading Plan [WPO- 2008 - 00014]
22. The dewatering orifices are not sized to the specifications in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook.
REV 1: Using the equation in the VESCH, for a 6 -hour drawdown time, engineering staff is
calculating smaller orifice sizes for the sediment basins than you have shown.
REV 2: Comment addressed.
23. Please provide a baffle for the eastern diversion dike into Sediment Basin 1.
REV 1: A baffle has been provided in Sediment Basin I, however, it will not intercept the flow
from the eastern diversion dike, please revise the location of the baffle.
REV 2: Comment addressed.
Amy Pflaum
From: Amy Pflaum
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 8:53 AM
To: Megan Yaniglos
Subject: Planning Application Review for SDP200800035O1d Trail Village BLock 3 (Phase 6) -Final .
Megan, Engineering review is complete for this project, we have no objection to approval.
Thanks, Amy
ti0F .
Jt
f
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832
September 2, 2008
Mr. Scott Collins
Collins Engineering
800 East Jefferson Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
RE: SDP -2008 -203- Old Trail Village Block 3 (Village Center)- Preliminary Plat
1r. Collins:
Fax (434) 972 -4126
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary
comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies,
as applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Division ofZoning & Current Development (Engineer)
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (E91 1)
Albemarle County Division of Zoning Inspections
Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board)
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue
Albemarle County Service Authority
Virginia Department of Transportation
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
could affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site
Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing
justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17"
copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached
comments of the Site Review Committee by September 15, 2008. Failure to submit this information by
this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are
subnitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65.
Please contact me at ,our earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Nlegan Yaniglos
Senior Planner
Zoning & Current Development
J
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Scott Collins (scott@collins- engineering.com)
From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner
Division: 'Zoning & Current Development
Date: September 2, 2008
Subject: SUB - 2008 -203- Old Trail Block 3- Final Plat
The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County
Department Community Development will reconnnend approve the plan referred to above when
the following iterns have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that
have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated
based on further review.) Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the
Albemarle County Code.
1. The approval of this subdivision will deem Phase It of the preliminary site plan approval
for Old Trail Block 3- SDP2007 -148 null and void.
2. 114 -303 (H)j Monunients. Provide the location and material of all permanent reference
monuments. Monuments found or installed prior to plat recordation may be referred to if
they are permanent and undisturbed. If any monument required by this chapter will be
installed after recordation of the final plat, the certification of the professional engineer or
land surveyor shall so note.
3. 114 -303 (0)] Signature panels. Revise the County signature panel to read 'Agent for the
Board of Supervisors'.
4. (14 -303 (S)l Control points. Provide at least four (-I) control points, evenly distributed
across the property and located at survey property corners, and shown on each sheet
depicting the property. At the option of the subdivider, the control points may be shown
on a copy of the final plat, rather than on the original final plat.
Please contact )vle YaniLIos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext.
3004 for further information.
Application #: SUB200800" 3 short Review Cc- iments
Project Name: Old Trail Village Block 3 -Final Final Plat
Date Completed: 08/28/2008
Reviewer Amy Pflaum Engineer Z &CD
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: The preliminary site plan of this Block (SDP200y00148) shows access to the block through proposed
Claremont Lane. Please report when the right -of -way of Claremont Lane is expected to be platted
and when the road will be built.
The preliminary site plan shows a sidewalk easement is necessary along Old Trail Drive.
The Block 3 Phase 6 final site plan (SDP200800035) shows a drainage easement and a sight
distance easement are necessary at the corner of Claremont Lane and Brookley Drive.
If the proposed development is significantly altered from what is shown on the preliminary site plan,
please add all information required by Section 14 -303 of the Subdivision Ordinance for further review.
Please revise Note #7 to state that this parcel is in the Lickinghole Creek Watershed.
Date Completed 08/25/2008
Reviewer: Andrew Slack
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION.
E911
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, September 04, 2008
t J
Service Auth4rit
TO: Megan Yaniglos
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: August 22, 2008
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Old Trail Village Block 3 -Final
SUB200800203
TM 55E -1 -A1
The below checked items apply to this site.
X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
2. An inch water line is located approximately distant.
3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is
Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
4. A inch sewer line is located approximately distant.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7. and plans are currently under review.
8. and plans have been received and approved.
9. No plans are required.
10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting tentative approval.
11. Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
Comments: There are approved construction drawings for Block 3, Phase A. This
subdivision plat should show the associated water easements.
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations water line size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
158 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698
www.serviceauthoriy.org