Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800038 Review Comments 2007-02-09pF \Clip ly COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax(434)972 -4126 Project: Flow Porsche [SDP200700012, WPO2007000041 Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fax 245 -0300] Owner or rep.: Flow Automotive [fax (336) 760 -7005] Plan received date: 06 Feb 2007 Date of comments: 09 Feb 2007 Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp A. Final Site & Drainage Plans (SDP200600127) This site refers to the Flow Automotive site (SDP200600127) as existing, when this site plan has not even been approved (nor has the SP associated with it been approved). The submitted plans for Flow Porsche do not appear to be approvable until the prior site is approved and built. Engineering recommends combining the plans and phasing them, in order to be able to approve both plans at the same time. 1. Please provide a professional signed and dated seal. [18-32.6. 11 2 Please show the layout of the entire site (parking, travelways. dumpsters, etc.) 3. 1 cannot tell the difference between the proposed grading for the proposed project compared to the proposed grading for the adjacent project. Several of the proposed grading lines intersect or branch. 4. The existing topography appears to be incorrect. Grade lines intersect and branch off. 5. Sidewalk directly adjacent to parking must be 6' in width or parking spaces must have bumper blocks. 6. Travelways adjacent to 9'x 18' spaces must maintain a 24' width. 7. Please provide pipe profiles, calculations, and a drainage summary table. 8. Travelway grades must not exceed 10 %, parking cannot exceed 51 and the first 40 feet of the entrance must not exceed 4 %. 9. The dumpster pads must extend 8 feet in front of the dumpster. 10. VDOT approval is required. 11. More comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. B. Stormwater Management Plan (WP0200600089) Please provide a Stormwater Management Plan and application for the water quality structures. Stormwater detention can be provided by the adjacent property. however, since it does not yet exist, the plans cannot be approved until the adjacent property is in place. Please provide a stormwater maintenance agreement. Also, the Filterra units should be arranged so that the they capture an equivalent area compared to the amount of impervious area added during SDP200600127 and SDP200400027. The Filterra units will need approval from Filterra. Additional comments will be provided once a Stormwater Management application has been completed. C. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200600089) Same as the minor amendment and stormwater management plan, the current E &S plan would not be able to be approved until the adjacent property actually exists as shown. 1. The site is not protected, as more than I acre will flow to inlet protection. 2. Show the limits of disturbance. 3. Please provide drainage area maps. 4. Show dust control, temporary seeding, and permanent seeding. 5. Provide perimeter controls. 6. More comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Flow Automotive [SDP200600127] Plan preparer: Collins Engineering [fat 245 -03001 Owner or rep.: Flow Automotive [fax (663) 760 -7005] Plan received date: 17 May 2007 Date of comments: 24 May 2007 Reviewer: Jonathan Sharp The following review comments replace the earlier review comments for Flow Automotive (dated 22 Jan 2007) and Flow Porsche (09 Feb 2007). As you are combining Flow Porsche with Flow Automotive, do you want to have SDP200700012 and WP0200700004 withdrawn? A. Final Site & Drainage Plans (SDP200600127) 1. There is a concern with the proposed layout of the Flow Auto building in regards to the deep hole, existing drop inlet structure 4, and the retaining wall and building footer which is up to over 20 feet high. Will the building have a basement? If the drop inlet fails (as it is currently now clogged), it could flood the building. Please provide more information in regards to the proposed building. Engineering recommends filling the area and getting rid of the giant hole. This could decrease the height of the building footer or retaining wall up to 10 feet. [DSM505G6] 2. Please provide more information about the covered roof area. Where will the columns holding up the roof be located? 3. VDOT approval is required for the entrance improvements affecting VDOT right-of-way. DSM902B] 4. Please provide easements for all off -site work. [DSM 1 102] 5. "There is concern with the 2:1 or greater slopes near the northwest corner of the site. DSM902A5] 6. Otfsite proposed drainage easements will need to be platted and signed by adjacent owners. 7. Curb and gutter is required in all newly proposed parking areas. (everywhere except for the parallel parking spaces running along the east side of the site) [I 8.4.12.15g] 8. Several of the parking spaces are unprotected. They will need to be protected by parking islands. [DSM902A5, 18- 32.7.2, 18- 4.12.15t] 9. Parking grade cannot exceed 5% in any direction. [18- 4.12.15e] 10. The dumpster located on the Flow Auto /Porsche Parcel is not accessible. [ 18- 4.12.15e] H. Several of the parking and aisle dimensions do not meet County Code. [ 18- 4.12.16a,c, DSM602.1 ] 12. Access aisle grade cannot exceed 10 %. [18- 4.12.17a] 13. Access aisles without adjacent parking must maintain a minimum 20 width. [18- 4.12.17c1] 14. Proposed elevation contour 424 is mislabeled as 423. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page - of 2 15. The bottom of wall elevation of 400 at the northwest corner of the proposed Flow Auto building appears to be incorrect. 16. The sidewalkAvall area where elevations 413, 414, and 415 converge at the proposed Flow Porsche building appears to have very steep grades. 17. The dumpster pad waiver has been granted by Zoning. 18. The parking space extending over property line will not be an issue as there is a proposed access easement. 19. Several of the drainage areas for inlets are incorrect. 20. Safety slabs are needed for manholes greater than 12" deep. [DSM505E9] 21. Additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. B. Stormwater Management Plan (WPO200600089) 1. Several of the Filterra units are configured in a manner in which they capture little to no runoff. How does runoff drain from the roof of the proposed Flow Auto building? Will it make it into the Filterra unit? (This is to make sure roof drains will not tie directly into the pipe system and bypass water quality.) 2. There is not enough information provided for the detention system to adequately construct it or verify if detention is adequate. Site specific details are necessary; the provided details are too generic and are very confusing. Please provide cross section details of the detention system and plan view section details. Please provide details of the outlet structure. Please indicate the location of cleanout /inspection points, vents, etc. 3. A letter of approval is required from Filterra. 4. Please provide a stormwater maintenance agreement. Agreements will be needed for TMP 78- 14D, TMP 78 -15D, and TMP 78 -15E. 5. Additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. 6. A stormwater bond will be computed once the plans are approved. C. Erosion Control Plan (WPO200600089) 1. Please provide copies of the needed construction easements. [DSM1 102] 2. There is work shown outside the limits of disturbance in all phases. [VESCH ch. 6 pgs. 13 -141 3. Please show the tree protection and tree protection details on the E &S plans. [VESCH 3.38] 4. In Phase 11, please use inlet protection rather than culvert inlet protection for the 0.2 drainage area draining to structure 13. [VESCH 3.07] 5. Please address when existing structures 3 and 4 will be connected with the E &S plan. It may be better to do this during the initial phase (phase 0). Also please address cleaning out the covered up existing drop inlet (structure 4) in the narrative. 6. Please show permanent stabilization (PS) on the plans. [VESCH 3.32] 7. An E &S bond will be computed once the plans are approved. Application #: SP200700045' iShort Review Cormnen s Project Namea Fl Automotive New Special Use Permit Date Completed: 10/31/2007 Reviewer: Gary Whelan ACSA Review Status: Requested Changes r - -Reviews Comments: This property was previously a water and sewer customer. The water service is shown on earlier plans but not the sewer service. We would like for the old sewer service to be shown and noted if it is cut and capped. Date Completed 01/02/2008 Reviewer: Gary Whelan ACSA Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: IThe ACSA doesn't have any comments on the SP, but we will for the site plan. Date Completed: 01/07/2008 Reviewer: Glenn Brooks Engineer Z &CD Review Status: Pending Reviews Comments: I have no comments on the display use. Please see previous comments regarding the plan. Date Completed: 10/25/2007 Reviewer: Glenn Brooks Engineer Z &CD Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: It is recommended that stormwater management be provided for this site and a portion of the upstream existing site. An analysis of the downstream system will be required with final plans, as it may not be adequate. Permission from off -site owners for work should be provided prior to approval of the SP Public drainage easements will be required for drainage from the right -of -way. Private easements will be required for increased drainage through downstream sites. Parking rows must be protected with curbed islands in the service area. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On. Monday, March 31, 2008 The turn lane should have a taper. Date Completed:11/09/2007 Reviewer:Joel DeNunzio VDOT Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. No comments on the width of the spaces or the parking turnarounds. 1:2. The internal flow of the site should accommodate truck traffic being able to maneuver within the site to flow in and out without stopping or backing onto route 250. 3. The improvements shown on route 250 were included with a previous site plan. The road and drainaye plan need to also be included when this site is submitted for a site plan. Date Completed:11/02/2007 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On. Monday, March 31, 2008 Reviews Comments: ,This proposal is eduled for ARB review on November 5, 2C ,omments will be provided after that meeting. Date Completed: 10/30/2007 Reviewer: Tamara Ambler Planning Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: I No water resources are located on the parcels associated with this project. The parcels are within 2,000 feet of two open DEQ leaking underground storage tank cases. However, given that the parcels are served by public water no impac is anticipat II Page: 2.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, March 31, 2008 Iflll" IL County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Gerald Gatobu, Current Development planning review From: Jonathan Sharp, Current Development engineering review Date: I I Oct 2007 Subject: Flow Automotive - Major (SDP200700099) Before Engineering can recommend preliminary and final approval to the major amendment, the following comments must be addressed: 1. One hundred feet on -site sight distance must be maintained by use of curbed islands a minimum 6' off building corners or other obstructions. 2. Curbing required on all proposed parking areas and travelways with VDOT designation (CG -2, CG,6) 3. All parking rows must be protected by curbed islands (for both the parallel and perpendicular spaces). The parallel spaces must be also be protected by curbed islands on the back side (side adjacent to the canopy. Curb islands must be a minimum 3" in width. 4. Will the existing perpendicular parking area directly adjacent to the guardrail and trees be removed or relocated? 5. Proposed parking areas cannot exceed 5% grade in any direction. 6. Please provide pavement design /details for proposed paving. 7. Please provide an adequate sidewalk detail: minimum 4" stone base and 4 " of concrete of 3000 psi at 28 days, or stronger. 8. Please provide Albemarle County general construction notes per Design Manual. 9. The tree protection is shown in the pavement. There doesn't appear to be any work near the trees. Tree protection is probably not needed. s F AL GIM COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 November 15, 2007 Sheeran Architects c/o Peter Sheeran 226 East High Street Charlottesville, Va 22902 RE: ARB2007 -00098 Flow Auto - Display Parking Addition Tax Map 78, Parcels 15D, 15E Dear Mr. Sheeran: Fax (434) 972 -4012 The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on November 5, 2007, completed a preliminary review of the above -noted request. The Board took the following actions. Regarding the Special Use Permit /Rezoning the Board by a vote of 5:0, forwarded the following recommendation to the Planning Commission: The ARB expresses no objection to the special use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Vehicles shall not be elevated anywhere on site. 2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in areas indicated for display shown on the plan entitled "Flow Automotives" prepared by Collins Engineering and dated 9/17/07. Display parking shall be only in designated striped parking spaces, as identified on this plan. 3. Final site plan approval is subject to ARB approval of the lighting plan (submitted with the site plan). Maximum light levels on site shall not exceed 30 footcandles. 4. Final site plan approval is subject to ARB approval of the landscape plan (submitted with the site plan). Landscaping shown on the plan will be required to be in excess of the minimum requirements of ARB guidelines and /or the Zoning Ordinance to compensate for the negative visual impact of the proposed use, including but not limited to the use of larger caliper trees, additional evergreen shrubs and continuous interior planting islands. Regarding the Preliminary Site Plan the Board made the following comments and suggestions for the benefit of the applicant's next submittal. 1. Coordinate parking totals and labeled spaces on sheet S -1. 2. Revise the two long internal planting islands to continuous planting islands. Eliminate the gaps in both islands. 3. Revise the landscape plan to include 3 large shade trees and evergreen shrubs in the long planting islands located at the interior of the display parking area. 4. In the planting areas that front the EC replace the Inkberry holly with an alternate species and indicate the plant size as 36" minimum at planting on both parcels. 5. In the planting island the fronts the EC, revise the row of holly to a staggered row on both parcels. 6. Extend the evergreen shrub row that fronts the EC into the end islands that frame the entrance to the site. 7. Space the large shade trees at 35' on center along the EC on both parcels. 8. Add interspersed ornamental trees along the EC, on both parcels. 9. Revise the existing conditions plan to include the existing plants on the east side of parcel 15. 10. Replace the White pine with an evergreen tree that provides more consistent long term screening and one that is better suited to the available space. 11. Replace the Hemlock with a more disease resistant tree. 12. Include the VT plant in the plant list or eliminate it from the plan. 13. Provide shade trees on parcels 15 and l 5E at 40' on center along the shared property line. Stagger these trees. 14. Continue the mixed planting along the full length of the area between parcels 15 and 15E. Do not stop short of the southern property line. 15. Add Schip laurel to the planting area between parcels 15 and 15E. 16. Provide 2 large shade trees and evergreen shrubs in each end island along the travelway shared between parcels 15D and 15E. 17. Coordinate the appearance of the three end islands located along the travelway that is shared between parcel 15D and 15E. 18. Replace the Redbuds with Serviceberry. 19. Coordinate all landscaping with existing and proposed utilities and easements. 20. Include the following note on the landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 21. Revise the photometric plan as follows: a. Use 1.0 as the maintenance factor (LLF). b. Limit light levels to no greater than 30 footcandles. c. Show lighting levels out to the property line. d. Limit spillover at the property line along Route 250 to less than .5 footcandles. e. Clearly indicate the proposed color for the fixtures on the plan. Bronze is recommended. 22. Resolve the grading issues on the west and south sides of the site regarding retaining walls, level planting area, filteras, etc. Include proposed grading on the landscape plan. 23. Provide revised architectural elevations for the addition to the existing building. Coordinate the size of the building illustrated in the elevations with the size of the building illustrated on the plan. Maintain the window at the south end of the west elevation in the revised design. 24. Add an understory of evergreen shrubs in the island between the Entrance Corridor and the maintenance building to the south. 25. The shade trees shall be a minimum of 3 '/" caliper. Ornamental trees and other understory trees shall be a minimum of 8' in height. Shrubs shall be a minimum of 3' in height. You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms checklists and schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.ora /nlannina. Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing. Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner Cc: Don Speight 1425 Plaza Drive Winston - Salem, N.C. 27103 Linkous, Janice S 2205 Shepherds Ridge Rd Charlottesville Va 22901 AL O 9 IRGII COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 April 2, 2008 Mr. Scott Collins Collins Engineering 800 East Jefferson Street Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: SDP - 2008 -038- Flow Automotive- Final Site Plan Mr. Collins: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E91 1) Albemarle County Division of Zoning Inspections Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by April 14, 2007. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Yaniglos Planner Zoning & Current Development t ' VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 David S. Ekern, P.E. VirginiaDOT.org COMMISSIONER April 3rd , ? 008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Cornments April 3' d , 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the April 3 2007 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2008 -00038 Flow Automotive -Final (Megan Yaniglos) Adjacent property TMP -78 -15 has a site plan to continue the right turn lane. Effort should be made to coordinate the construction of these sites to minimize traffic interruption and construction costs. The radius of 13 feet at the east end of the property should be 25 feet and CG -6 should be used. The flow line at the eastern entrance should be adjusted to allow for future extension of the right turn lane. Sight distance towards the east needs to be shown at this entrance. The drainage areas need to be checked on the road sections. It appears that the centerline of the road is the divide and this section of road is in a full super section. Structure EX5 needs to be relocated instead of removed and because the spread on EX -4 is greater than the allowable spread. SDP - 2008 -00039 Durkin Property / Verizon Wireless Final (Gerald Gatobu) No comments SDP - 2008 -00040 Final Touch — Prel. (Summer Frederick) The sight distance at the existing entrance needs to be shown. Show the proposed ROW lines. The final plan will need road and drainage plans. Any work within the VDOT ROW will need a Land Use Permit. 00YEARSOF TRANSPORTATION EXCELLENCE 916 200 6 SDP - 2008 -00041 North Pointe - Northwest Residential -prel. (Gerald Gatobu) Proffered items under phase III road construction are supposed to be complete prior to this site plan approval. Proffer V- 5.3.1 -ci is missing from the proffers at the beginning of the plan. The ingress to the site off route 29 should either be a yield condition or accommodate a proper merge according to AASHTO standard merge lengths. The egress onto route 29 needs to have a lane configuration and lengths to accommodate the queue from the traffic study queue analysis. The lane shifts on route 29 need to be a minimum of 720 feet in length. The lane shift on Northwest Passage needs to be in accordance with the design speed of the road. The CG -6 on the north side of the entrance needs to have a minimum 12 foot offset and an appropriate taper to tie back into the pavement on route 29. Road and drainage plans will be needed with the final site plan. A Land Use Permit will be needed for any work within the VDOT ROW. SDP - 2008 -00042 Buck Mountain Episcopal Church / Verizon (Melzan Yanit!los) Sight distance needs to be shown for the connection to Earlysville Road. SUB - 2008 -00076 Old Trail- Ballard Field Townhomes -Phase III (Summer Frederick) No comments Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti I W P County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Scott Collins (scott @collins- engineering.com) From:Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division:Zoning & Current Development Date:April 2, 2008 Subject:SDP -2008 -038- Flow Automotive- Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. There are trees shown over where a drainage easement is required on TMP 78 -15. Show the drainage easement and revise so that the trees are outside of the drainage easement. Trees are not permitted in drainage easements. 2. [32.7.9.8] Some of the landscaping proposed are over pipes, move all proposed trees off of the pipes. 3. [32.7.9.8] Proposed Red Cedars located in the adjacent property, TMP 78 -15 are on the existing curb, move off of the curb and into the landscape area. 4. [32.7.9.8] There is proposed landscaping shown over existing landscaping. Indicate if the existing landscaping is to be removed, or move the proposed landscaping off of the existing. 5. [4.17.4] On the lighting plan, indicate that the proposed fixtures are `Flat Lens' as to insure full cut -off. 6. [Special Use Permit Condition 451 Final site plan approval is subject to the recordation of easements for ingress /egress and for the installation, maintenance and use of planter islands and landscaping on adjacent parcels (Tax Map 78, Parcels 15, 15D and 15E). Provide easements and deeds of easements for the above mentioned off site improvements. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for further information. OF Ale / r r RGINN County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com) From:Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division:Zoning & Current Development Date:April 2, 2008 Subject:SDP- 2008 -038- Flow Automotive- Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] di --, There are trees shown over where a drainage easement is required on TMP 78 -15. Show the drainage easement and revise so that the trees are outside of the drainage easement. X - Yrees are not permitted in drainage easements. 32.7.9.8] Some of the landscaping proposed are over pipes, move all proposed trees off of the pipes.ll • [32.7.9.8] Proposed Red Cedars located in the adjacent property, TMP 78 -15 are on the xisting curb, move off of the curb and into the landscape area. 6h. Cv' 32.7.9.8] There is proposed landscaping shown over existing landscaping. Indicate if the L . existing landscaping is to be removed, or move the proposed landscaping off of the existing. 17.4] On the lighting plan, indicate that the proposed fixtures are `Flat Lens' as to insure full cut -off. 6. [Special Use Permit Condition #5] Final site plan approval is subject to the recordation of easements for ingress /egress and for the installation, maintenance and use of planter islands and landscaping on adjacent parcels (Tax Map 78, Parcels 15, 15D and 15E). Provide easements and deeds of easements for the above mentioned off site improvements. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for further information. Stij F.J County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Scott Collins (scott @collins - engineering.com) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: April 2, 2008 Subject: SDP - 2008 -038- Flow Automotive- Final Si Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 4Yhere are trees shown over where a drainage easement is required on TMP 78 -15. Show the drainage easement and revise so that the trees are outside of the drainage easement. Trees are not permitted in drainage easements. 32.7.9.8] Some of the landscaping proposed are over pipes, move all proposed trees off the pipes. 32.7.9.8] Proposed Red Cedars located in the adjacent property, TMP 78 -15 are on the Xexisting curb, move off of the curb and into the landscape area. r[32.7.9.8] There is proposed landscaping shown over existing landscaping. Indicate if the existing landscaping is to be removed, or move the proposed landscaping off of the d - existing. IX.. [4.17.4] On the lighting plan, indicate that the proposed fixtures are 'Flat Lens' as to insure full cut -off. Special Use Permit Condition #5] Final site plan approval is subject to the recordation of easements for ingress /egress and for the installation, maintenance and use of planter islands and landscaping on adjacent parcels (Tax Map 78, Parcels 15, 15D and 15E). Provide easements and deeds of easements for the above mentioned off site improvements. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for further information. y A :tr 3' y- County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Yaniglos, Current Development Project Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Current Development Engineering Review Date: 31 March 2008 Subject: Flow Automotive (SDP -2008- 00038) The final site plan for Flow Automotive has been reviewed. Before engineering can recommend approval the following items must be addressed: 1. It does not appear that the fill in the southwest corner of the site (near existing STM manhole 5) can tie to existing grading without exceeding a 2:1 slope. [18- 32.6.6] 2. The disturbance of existing areas of critical slope will require a waiver by the Planning Commission. [18 -42, 14 -304] 3. One hundred feet on -site sight distance must be maintained by use of curbed islands a minimum 6' off building corners or other obstructions. Please provide curbed islands (minimum 3'x6') at the northeast and southeast corners of the existing portion of the building. 4. All parking rows must be protected by curbed islands. The proposed parallel parking along the eastern property line of the site must be flanked by curbed islands. [18 -4.12] 5, Curbing is required on all parking areas, please show curbing along the proposed parallel parking on the eastern property line of the site. 6. Proposed parking areas may not exceed 5% grade in any direction. All new parking spaces must meet this criteria, including those proposed on existing pavement. 7. Proposed sidewalks must be a minimum of 5' wide, exclusive of the curb. Those shown around the proposed showroom appear to scale less than this. As this is a very "tight" site, please verify the dimension. 8. Please revise the Sight Distance Exhibit to state proper scale, show lane lines on Route 250, and shade the site triangles. Please see VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix B, Page B -1 1. 9. Please revise the Easement Exhibit to include information pertaining to the parties easements will be dedicated to and from. 10. An easement is not required on the portion of the 4" sanitary sewer service lateral that is on the parcel under review. Where the lateral leaves this parcel and enters another, an easement is required there. [18- 32.7.4] 11. Please label the two round symbols found in the center of TMP 78 -15E on the Site Plan, they do not show up on the Existing Conditions Plan. Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 12. There is an existing retaining wall shown on TMP 78 -15 in the area of proposed grading. Is this wall to be removed? 13. The labeling of the storm sewer system is confusing. For example, the existing STM manhole near the southwest corner of the site is labeled as both "EX 1 " and "5 ". On the Profile sheet it is labeled as "EX STR 1" in one profile and "EX STR 5" in another. Please clarify this labeling. It is also unclear which portions of the storm sewer pipes are to be abandoned and which are to remain. Please clarify by shading the existing pipes and labeling the proposed pipes with sizes and lengths. 14. On the border of the two sheets pertaining to erosion & sediment control, "erosion" is spelled incorrectly in the title block. 15. Comments on the Drainage Areas and Computations, Stormwater Management Plan, and Erosion Sediment Control Plan will be forthcoming with the review of the previously submitted WPO application (WP0200800020). 16. VDOT approval is required for any work affecting the public right -of -way. 17. More comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. Application #: SDP2O Short Review COmmen s Project Name: Flow Automotive - Final Final — Non - residential — Administrati Date Completed: 03/31/2008 Reviewer: Amy Pflaum Engineer Z &CD Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Site Review Meeting 4/3/08, comments due in cityview 3/31/08 03/28/2008 Jay Schlothauer Inspections Requested Changes 3ased on plans revised December 28, 2007. 3earrange the barrier -free parking spaces so that at least one of them is van - accessible. 03/20/2008 Margaret Maliszewski ARB Requested Changes Fhe ARB reviewed this proposal on November 5, 2007. The Board's action, attached, indicates that mother ARB submittal /review is required. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 Albemarle County Service Authority Serving 6 Conserving TO: Megan Yaniglos FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: March 28, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for:Flow Automotive -Final SDP200800038 TM 78 -15E The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2.A 4 inch water line is located approximately 10' distant. 3.Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4.An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 10' distant. 5.An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6.No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. X 9.No plans are required. 10.Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11.Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12.RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13.City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Provide plumbing fixture count to size the meter. Backflow prevention is required. Show water meter location. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434977 -4511 • Fax (434)979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org l_ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Yaniglos, Current Development Project Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Current Development Engineering Review Date: 31 March 2008 Subject: Flow Automotive (SDP - 2008 - 00038) The final site plan for Flow Automotive has been reviewed. Before engineering can recommend approval the following items must be addressed: I . It does not appear that the fill in the southwest corner of the site (near existing STM manhole 5) can tie to existing grading without exceeding a 2:1 slope. [18- 32.6.6] 2. The disturbance of existing reas of critical slope will require a waiver b the Planninggpqyf ';C7 Commission. [18-4.2, 14 -304] v 3. One hundred feet on -site sight distance must be maintained by use of curbed islands a minimum 6' off building corners or other obstructions. Please provide curbed islands (minimum 3'x6') at the northeast and southeast corners of the existing portion of the building. 4. All parking rows must be protected by curbed islands. The proposed parallel parking along the eastern property line of the site must be flanked by curbed islands. [18 -4.12] 5. Curbing is required on all parking areas, please show curbing along the proposed parallel parking on the eastern property line of the site. 6. Proposed parking areas may not exceed 5% grade in any direction. All new parking spaces must meet this criteria, including those proposed on existing pavement. 7. Proposed sidewalks must be a minimum of 5' wide, exclusive of the curb. Those shown around the proposed showroom appear to scale less than this. As this is a very "tight" site, please verify the dimension. 8. Please revise the Sight Distance Exhibit to state proper scale, show lane lines on Route 250, and shade the site triangles. Please see VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix B. Page B -1 1. 9. Please revise the Easement Exhibit to include information pertaining to the parties easements will be dedicated to and from. 10. An easement is not required on the portion of the 4" sanitary sewer service lateral that is on the parcel under review. Where the lateral leaves this parcel and enters another, an easement is required there. [18- 32.7.4] 11. Please label the two round symbols found in the center of TMP 78 -15E on the Site Plan. they do not show up on the Existing Conditions Plan. Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 12. There is an existing retaining wall shown on TMP 78 -15 in the area of proposed grading. Is this wall to be removed.' 13. The labeling of the storm sewer system is contusing. For example, the existing STM manhole near the southwest corner of the site is labeled as both " EX I" and "5 ". On the Profile sheet it is labeled as "EX STR 1 in one profile and "EX STR 5" in another. Please clarify this labeling. It is also unclear which portions of the storm sewer pipes are to be abandoned and which are to remain. Please clarify by shading the existing pipes and labeling the proposed pipes with sizes and lengths. 14. On the border of the two sheets pertaining to erosion & sediment control, "erosion " is spelled incorrectly in the title block. 15. Comments on the Drainage Areas and Computations, Stormwater Management Plan, and Erosion Sediment Control Plan will be forthcoming with the review of the previously submitted WPO application (WPO200800020). 16. VDOT approval is required for any work affecting the public right -of -way. 17. More comments may be necessary upon resubmittal. rt 71y COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 To: Megan Yaniglos, Senior Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineer Subject: SDP - 2008 - 00038, Flow Automotive, Final Site Plan, Critical Slope Waiver Request Date received: 15 April 2008 Date of Comment: 23 April 2008 The request for a waiver to develop on areas of critical slope for grading incorporated with the new construction proposed on TMP's 78 -15D and 78 -15E was received on 15 April 2008. The existing critical slopes and proposed grading are shown on the Final Site Plan dated February 20, 2008. The engineering analysis of the request follows: Description of critical slope area and proposed disturbance: The critical slope areas within TMP's 78 -15D and 78 -15E appear to contain both natural and man -made slopes. The apparent man -made slopes appear to have been embankments created when asphalt and gravel parking and travelways were constructed on the Flow Automotive site. The presumably natural critical slopes are wooded low spots on TMP 78 -15E. The critical slope disturbances are in the form of commercial construction including parking spaces, landscaped curb islands, underground detention and stormwater facilities. Areas Acres Total site area 1.95 Area of critical slopes man -made & natural) Man -made = 0.09 Natural = 0.07 4.6% of development 3.6% of development Total critical slopes area 0.16 8.2% of development Total critical slopes disturbed 0.16 100% of critical slopes Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18 -4.2 is addressed: rapid and /car large scale movement nfsoil and reek ": The areas of existing critical slopes on this site are small and scattered. In most cases, the slopes are being tilled over rather than cut into. Large scale movement of soil and rock is not anticipated to occur as a result of this construction. 2. "evicessihe storrr7tirater run- nff "': The applicant has submitted a Storm water Management Plan which is being reviewed for County compliance. Stormwater facilities are being Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review comments Page 2 of 2 proposed to control the drainage generated by this site through underground detention and proper conveyance systems. Excessive stormwater runoff is not expected as a result of disturbance of these critical slopes. 3. "siltation of'zurtrncrl crncl nurzz -Horde hoclies nf'lruter ": The applicant has submitted an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan which is being reviewed for County compliance. The submitted Plan consists of two phases — the first providing E &S control measures during earth - moving activities such as dust control, silt fence and temporary seeding, and the second proposing storm sewer inlet protection and permanent seeding on exposed ground during the final stages of construction. These measures are anticipated to reduce sediment -laden runoff from leaving the site. Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will ensure long tern stability. 4. "lass crf aesthetic r•esotwce ": The disturbance of the existing critical slopes with this development does involve the removal of existing trees. The applicant has submitted a detailed landscaping plan which includes the addition of several trees and shrubs anticipated to screen and enhance the proposed parking area. This site is located within the highly visible Entrance Corridor along Route 250, and is therefore subject to approval by the ARB. 5. "septic effluent ": No septic systems or drainfields are proposed in this project. This site is accessible to the public sanitary sewer system. This site does drain into a waterway that is a public drinking water supply for Albemarle County. No portion of this site plan is located inside the 100 -year flood plain area according to FEMA Maps, dated 04 February 2005. Based on the above review, there are no engineering concerns which prohibit the disturbance of the critical slopes as shown on the plans. Copy: SDP -2008- 00038, Flow Automotive Final Site Plan File: El_csw_ADP_sdp200800038 ALg } IRGIN COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 May 15, 2008 Collins Engineering - Scott Collins 800 E Jefferson Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: SDP200800038 Flow Automotive — Final Tax Map 78, Parcel 151), Tax Map 78, and Parcel 15E Dear Mr. Collins: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on, May 6, 2008 approved the above -noted petition, Critical Slopes Waiver, Section 4.2, by a vote of 6:0, If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me at (434) 296 -5832. Sincerely, I c Megan Yani' I99 Planner Zoning and Current Development Division MY /SM Cc: Flow Companies 1425 Plaza Drive Winston -Salem NC 27103 i >krnti'r County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date: June 11, 2008 Subject: SUB200800105, 106, 107 Flow Automotive (SDP200800038, WP0200800020) The easements for Flow Automotive, TM 78, Parcels 14D, 15D and 15E, received on 24 April 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can not recommend approval of the easements until the following items are adequately addressed: A. SUB200800105: 1. Because the proposed 24 -inch storm sewer pipe between inlets EX 1 and EX4 will be approximately 20- feet deep, a standard 20 -foot easement will not be adequate. Although it is understood that a portion of this easement will be on the neighboring property (TMP 78 -15), it appears that the portion on TMP 78- 15E will need to be increased. Please see the Albemarle County Design Standards Manual for the required width. 2. Drainage easements must be labeled as "dedicated to public use ". B. SUB200800106: The 14 -foot wide strip along the Route 250 right -of -way is shown differently on the site plan SDP200800038). On the site plan, at the eastern end, the strip is only 8 -feet wide. Please revise the plans to match. C. SUB200800107: 4. Because the proposed 24 -inch storm sewer pipe between inlets EX 1 and EX4 will be approximately 20- feet deep, a standard 20 -foot easement will not be adequate. Although it is understood that a portion of this easement will be on the neighboring property (TMP 78 -15E), it appears that the portion on TMP 78- 15 will need to be increased. Please see the Albemarle County Design Standards Manual for the required width. Drainage easements must be labeled as "dedicated to public use ". COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Project: Plan preparer: Plan received date Date of comments: Reviewer: Fax (434) 972 - 4126 Flow Automotive - Final [SDP200800038] Collins Engineering [email: ,cottiei colliiis- enLIiieet_in.colliI 1 I Mar 2008 16 Apr 2008 (Rev I) 19 May 2008 (Rev2) 31 Mar 2008 24 Apr 2008 (Rev I ) 03 .July 2008 (Rev2) Amy Pt7aum, Jonathan Sharp (Rev], Rev2) The final site plan for Flow Automotive has been reviewed. Before engineering can recommend approval the following items must be addressed: A. Final Site Plan comments 6. Proposed parking areas may not exceed 5% grade in any direction. All new parking spaces must meet this criteria, including those proposed on existing pavement. Revl: An administrative waiver request, for this item is being reviewed by Engineering and Zoning stuff Rev?: ? Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 5 9. Please revise the Easement Esbibit to include information pertaining to the parties easements will be dedicated to and from. Reel: All offsitc drainage easements and anY necessary construction easements urill need to he recorded prior to inal .site plan approval. Rev2: Easement comments are attached at the end of the comment letter. Any drainage easentents dedicated to public nse ttntst be accompanied by a deed approved by the County Attorney. 16. VDOT approval is required for any work affecting the public right -of -way. Rev 1. ,4 copy of the plans has heen fcurirarded to VDOT for review. Rev2: We have not} , et received any continents front VDOT. The latest copy of the plans should have been forwarded to VDOT for review. 17. Additional comments: Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 5 26. Please include the following on the pipe profiles: a. A VDOT designation for each structure b. A throat length or grate type for each inlet. c. Inlet shaping (IS - I) in all structures d. Safety slabs (SL -1) in any structures taller than 12 feet. Rev2: comments not addresser. 29. All spreads must be less than 10 feet. Rev2: No inlet calculations have been provided with tWs submittal. B. Stormwater Management comments 30. Please provide a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement signed by the land owners of TMP 78 -14D, 15D, and 15E. Please include the appropriate $17 fee. Please send to Pam Shifflett. Rev2: comments not addressed. 33. Please label the elevations of the orifice and weir, and label the weir length and location in the manhole (is it centered in the manhole ?). Rev2: The proposed pipe configuration out letting from the raintanks is inadequate. The pipe inverts are too close together and are overlapping. Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 4 of 5 42. A SWM bond will be computed by the County once the plans have been approved. C. Erosion Control Plans 47. Please clearly show details of how the TSD will tie into a manhole. Safety is a concern. The manhole will be upwards of 15 feet deep and is very close to pedestrian areas. Rev2: Will the manhole be large enough for the TSD to fit inside it? A standard VDOT manhole only has a 20.5" opening. 49. Please provide calculations to show that the downstream drainage system is adequate. [MS -19] Rev2: An analysis should be providedfrom the site clown to the Rivanna River (floodplain). 50. An ESC bond will be computed by the County once the plans have been approved. t j Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 5 of 5 katA County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Patrick Lawrence, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date: June 11, 2008 Subject: SUB200800105, 106, 107 Flow Automotive (SDP200800038, WP0200800020) The easements for Flow Automotive, TM 78, Parcels 14D, 15D and 15E, received on 24 April 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can not recommend approval of the easements until the following items are adequately addressed: A. SUB200800105: 1. Because the proposed 24 -inch storm sewer pipe between inlets EX I and EX4 will be approximately 20 -feet deep, a standard 20 -foot easement will not be adequate. Although it is understood that a portion of this easement will be on the neighboring property (TMP 78 -15), it appears that the portion on TMP 78 -15F will need to be increased. Please see the Albemarle County Design Standards Manual for the required width. 2. Drainage easements must be labeled as "dedicated to public use B. SUB200800106: 3. The 14 -foot wide strip along the Route 250 right -of -way is shown differently on the site plan SDP200800038). On the site plan, at the eastern end, the strip is only 8 -feet wide. Please revise the plans to match. C. SUB200800107: 4. Because the proposed 24 -inch storm sewer pipe between inlets EX and EX4 will be approximately 20 -feet deep, a standard 20 -foot easement will not be adequate. Although it is understood that a portion of this easement will be on the neighboring property (TMP 78 -15E), it appears that the portion on TMP 78 -15 will need to be increased. Please see the Albemarle County Design Standards Manual for the required width. 5. Drainage easements must be labeled as "dedicated to public use ".