Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800056 Review Comments 2008-05-01Application #:' - SDP200 Short Review Comments Ji,5 . FGA' 1?h cl 5lr Project Name:[Wick Pond (Phase II) Preli Site Development Plan i Preli — Non-residential Preliminary — Residential Date Completed: 12/01/2006 Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911 Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: !THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT THIS OFFICE WITH THREE (3) POSSIBLE ROAD NAMES F EACH ROAD SHOWN BEFORE SUBMITTING FINAL PLATS. Date Completed: 11/21/2006 Reviewer: Brent Nelson ARB Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: ;ARB review was limited to Phase 2B. Phase 2A was not reviewed due to it's lack of visibility from the IEC in the current proposal. Should changes in the project result in an increase in visibility of Phase 2A f EC, ARB review may be required Date Completed: 12/04/2006 Reviewer: Claudette Grant Planning Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Proffers should probably be added to the cover sheet of plans. Applicant was going to request a variation to Wickham Pond I in order to address landscaping c relating to proffer 4. 1 Date Completed: 11/3012006 r Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections r Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated November 13, 2006. Provide barrier -free parking spaces, in the buildings' parking garages, as follows: Bldg. A - one van - accessible space Bldg. B - one van - accessible space I Bldg. C - one van - accessible space, and one regular space Bldg. D - one van - acce space, a one regular space. Ki6t t1Cl t - t II EC " L' `1)l11 a t L:(Ctt,; Jj,tbC i 1L l t.t l /- CDL LAC "yvYLt aZS f N l A ` ` ' Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 Application #:I SDP200800056 — Short Review Comindnts Project NameMic Pond (Phase II -Block 2) -Final Final — Residential —Administrative Date Completed: 04/23/2008 Reviewer: Brent Nelson ARB Review Status: Approved Reviews Comments: ARB 07 -58, Wickham Pond II, Block 2 was approved on 8 -30 -07 (see posted approval). Subsequent additions or revisions to the site plan that were not reviewed by the ARB (or conflict with the approved plan) will require review /approval from ARB staff. Applicant should provide drawings clearly denoting all such changes. Some issues identified: The dumpster enclosure shown adjacent to the north elevation of Building B is not part of the ARB japproval and would not be approved by staff due to its proximity to the EC. Approved hedgerow plantings, adjacent to Route 240, are not labeled. Approved street trees on the east side of Wickham Place and the south side of Wickham Way are not labeled on the landscape plan. The installation of these trees is required prior to the completion of Phase I I - Block 2. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 O r C I, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Memorandum To: Ammy George, Tinunons Group From: Lisa Glass, Principal Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development Date: May 2, 2008 Subject: SDP 08 -56: Wickham Pond, Phase II, Block 2: Final Site Plan Fax(434)972 -4126 The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be approved when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. Each comment is followed by a reference to the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. The Site Plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Other conunents will be forth coming under separate cover. Please work directly with each reviewer to obtain tentative approvals. The final site plan must match the approved ARB plan. For example, the dumpster near Route 240 will require ARB approval or needs to be removed. 2. Provide minimum setback lines, yard and building separation requirements. This may be by a schedule or indicated on the plan. (Section 32.5.6 a) 3. Proffers include some site plan specifics. The plan should include the board fence, a note regarding full cut -off lighting and not shoe -box, and that landscape shall be completed as part of Phase 1. Please add a statement on the plan regarding the specifics to building C and D regarding when Certificates of Occupancy (CO's) can be requested. Let me know if you have questions or concerns regarding this continent. (Section 32.5.6 a and ZMA 05 -18) 4. Please add a schedule or note indicating the maximum amount of impervious cover, amount of paved parking and circulation, proposed uses and acreage in each use. (Section 32.5.6.b ) 5. Show Handicap Parking. The number and type of spaces to be provided are indicated in the Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from Jay Schlothaur (attached). (Section 32.5.6 b) 6. Please show easements for water and sewer lines, as well as easement for other utilities. (Section 32.5.6 j, k and 1) 7. Please indicate paved surface materials on plan, for all walks, parking lots and driveways (both outside and in garage). (Section 32.5.6.n and Section 32.6.8) 8. Please state that there is no signage or show location for proposed signs. (Section 32.5.6.n) Comments 6 -10 from Preliminary approval letter: 9. Approval of screening around dumpsters. (Section 32.5.6 and 14.12.19) 10. Provide loading space calculations. Also, the 300 feet between Building C and the loading spaces is not reasonably "adjacent to the structure it serves ". Consider another space that is closer the building C. (Section 14.12.13 and 14.12.19) 11. Please correct the parking schedule so they do not contradict each other, using the correct 2.5 multiplier. And realign the text so it is easier to read. (Section 32.5.6.b, and ZMA 05 -18) 12. Approval of the Landscape Plan: Refer to continents from ARB and the approved ARB plan regarding the need for hedge rows and street trees, and match the final plan to the prelim plan and approved ARB plan. (Section 32.7.9) 13. Approval of the lighting plan: Please indicate location of out door lighting, type and illumination plan or indicate no outside lighting. (Sections 32.5.6.n, 32.6 j and 4.17) Comments from Final Site Plan Check list: 14. Detailed water and sewer plans, please copy the Current Development planner on ACSA approval. (Section 32.6 c) 15. Detailed drainage and grading: please copy Current Development planner on Eng Approvals. Consider how the lower level of the parking garage will drain; and the height for entry and use of a dumpster truck if that is used for the dumpster enclosure. (Section 32.6d) 16. Note that traffic generation figures need final approval from Engineering. (Section 32.5.6 q) Attachments: Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from Jay Schlothaur CC: File SDP 2008 -0056 a IIt'i Fax (434) 972 -4126 The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be approved when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. Each comment is followed by a reference to the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. The Site Plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Other comments will be forth coming under separate cover. Please work directly with each reviewer to obtain tentative approvals. 1. The final site plan must match the approved ARB plan. For example, the dumpster near Route 240 will require ARB approval or needs to be removed. Provide minimum setback lines, yard and building separation requirements. This may be by a schedule or indicated on the plan. (Section 32.5.6 a) 3. Proffers include some site plan specifics. The plan should include the board fence, a note reoarding full cut -off lighting and not shoe -box, and that landscape shall be completed as part of Phase 1. Please add a statement on the plan regarding the specifics to building C and D regarding when Certificates of Occupancy (CO's) can be requested. Let me know if you have questions or concerns regarding this comment. (Section 32.5.6 a and ZMA 05 -18) 4. Please add a schedule or note indicating the maximum amount of impervious cover, amount of paved parking and circulation, proposed uses and acreage in each use. (Section 32.5.6.b ) 5. Show Handicap Parking. The number and type of spaces to be provided are indicated in the Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from Jay Schlothaur (attached). (Section 32.5.6 b) 6. Please show easements for water and sewer lines, as well as easement for other utilities. (Section 32.5.6j, k and 1) 7. Please indicate paved surface materials on plan, for all walks, parking lots and driveways (both outside and in garage). (Section 32.5.6.n and Section 32.6.8) 8. Please state that there is no signage or show location for proposed signs. (Section 32.5.6.n) 0 , A1, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434)296 -5832 Memorandum To:Ammy George, Timmons Group From:Lisa Glass, Principal Planner Division:Zoning and Current Development Date:May 2, 2008 Subject:SDP 08 -56: Wickham Pond, Phase 11, Block 2: Final Site Plan a IIt'i Fax (434) 972 -4126 The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be approved when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. Each comment is followed by a reference to the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. The Site Plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Other comments will be forth coming under separate cover. Please work directly with each reviewer to obtain tentative approvals. 1. The final site plan must match the approved ARB plan. For example, the dumpster near Route 240 will require ARB approval or needs to be removed. Provide minimum setback lines, yard and building separation requirements. This may be by a schedule or indicated on the plan. (Section 32.5.6 a) 3. Proffers include some site plan specifics. The plan should include the board fence, a note reoarding full cut -off lighting and not shoe -box, and that landscape shall be completed as part of Phase 1. Please add a statement on the plan regarding the specifics to building C and D regarding when Certificates of Occupancy (CO's) can be requested. Let me know if you have questions or concerns regarding this comment. (Section 32.5.6 a and ZMA 05 -18) 4. Please add a schedule or note indicating the maximum amount of impervious cover, amount of paved parking and circulation, proposed uses and acreage in each use. (Section 32.5.6.b ) 5. Show Handicap Parking. The number and type of spaces to be provided are indicated in the Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from Jay Schlothaur (attached). (Section 32.5.6 b) 6. Please show easements for water and sewer lines, as well as easement for other utilities. (Section 32.5.6j, k and 1) 7. Please indicate paved surface materials on plan, for all walks, parking lots and driveways (both outside and in garage). (Section 32.5.6.n and Section 32.6.8) 8. Please state that there is no signage or show location for proposed signs. (Section 32.5.6.n) Comments 6 -10 from Preliminary approval letter: 9. Approval of screening around dumpsters. (Section 32.5.6 and 14.12.19) 10. Provide loading space calculations. Also, the 300 feet between Building C and the loading spaces is not reasonably "adjacent to the structure it serves ". Consider another space that is closer the building C. (Section 14.12.13 and 14.12.19) 11. Please correct the parking schedule so they do not contradict each other, using the correct 2.5 multiplier. And realign the text so it is easier to read. (Section 32.5.6.b, and ZMA 05 -18) 12. Approval of the Landscape Plan: Refer to comments from ARB and the approved ARB plan regarding the need for hedge rows and street trees, and match the final plan to the prelim plan and approved ARB plan. (Section 32.7.9) 13. Approval of the lighting plan: Please indicate location of out door lighting, type and illumination plan or indicate no outside lighting. (Sections 32.5.6.n, 32.6j and 4.17) Comments from Final Site Plan Check list: 14. Detailed water and sewer plans, please copy the Current Development planner on ACSA approval. (Section 32.6 c) 15. Detailed drainage and grading: please copy Current Development planner on Eng Approvals. Consider how the lower level of the parking garage will drain; and the height for entry and use of a dumpster truck if that is used for the dumpster enclosure. (Section 32.6d) 16. Note that traffic generation figures need final approval from Engineering. (Section 32.5.6 y) Attachments: Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from Jay Schlothaur CC: File SDP 2008 -0056 2 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Memorandum To:Ammy George, Timmons Group From:Lisa Glass, Principal Planner Division:Zoning and Current Development Date:May 2, 2008_ Subject:SDP 08 -56: Wickham Pond, Phase II B1ocL Final Site Plan The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be approved when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. Each comment is followed by a reference to the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. The Site Plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Other comments will be forth coming under separate cover. Please work directly with each reviewer to obtain tentative approvals. The final site plan must match the approved ARB plan. For example, the dumps er near Route 240 will require ARB approval or needs to be removed.6LW A 12 2,, D g , 00 2 minimum setback lines, yard and building separation requirements. This may be by a sStLduk or indicated on the plan. (Section 32.5.6 a) i,1x 4 eV1 C4* Cj J t aOJ 1 V Proffers include some site plan specifics. The plan should include the board fence, a note In Q WX regardin full cut -off lighting and not shoe -box, and that landscape shall be completed as part of Phase 1 . Please add a statement on the plan regarding the specs ics to building C and D regarding u9 bU v when Certificates of Occupancy (CO's) can be requested. Let me know if you have questions or n0. ` _y• concerns regarding this comment. (Section 32.5.6 a and ZMA 05 -18) i bt 4o Please add a schedule or note indicating the maximum amount of impervious cover Amount of paved parking and circulation proposed uses and adage in each use. (Section 32.5.6.b ) how Handicap Parking. The number and type of spaces to be provided are indicated in the Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from ay chlothaur (att c ed). (Section 32.5.6 b) q ajj ,ave_a pL GM l,,C6 . ) Please show easements for water and sewer lines, as well as easement for other utilities. (Section 32.5.6 j, k and 1) ew) tV% e-y['. C;c dACi C_1.(,t Please indicate paved surface materials on plan, for all walks, parking lots and driveways (both outside and in garage). (Section 32.5.6.n and Section 32.6.8) Please state that there is no signage or show location for proposed signs. (Section 32.5.6.n) Comments 6 -10 from Preliminary approval letter: lgf/Approval of screening around dumpsters. (Section 32.5.6 and 14.12.19) S-Vfrovide loading space calculations. Also, the 300 feet between Building C and the loading spaces is not reasonably "adjacent to the structure it serves ". Consider another space that is closer the buil di C (Section 14.12.13 and 14.12.19) ODPlease correct the parking schedule so they do not contradict each other, using the correct 2.5 multiplier. And realign the text so it is easier to read. (Section 32.5.6.b, and ZMA 05 -18) ko tads 12 Approval of the Landscape Plan: Refer to comments from ARB and the approved ARB plan regarding the need for hedge rows and street trees, and match the final plan to the prelim plan and approv ARB plan. (Section 32.7.9) Approval of the lighting plan: Please indicate location of out door lighting, type and illumination plan or indicate no outside lighting. (Sections 32.5.6.n, 32.6 j and 4.17) Comments from Final Site Plan Check list: 4. Detailed water and sewer plans, please copy the Current Development planner on ACSA approval. (Section 32.6 c) 1 Detailed drainage and grading: please copy Current Development planner on Eng Approvals.Consider how the lower level of the parking garage will drain; and the height for entry and use of a dumpster truck if that is used for the dumpster enclosure. (Section 32.6d) VS. Note that traffic generation figures need final approval from Engineering. (Section 32.5.6 q) Attachments: Inspection comments dated 11/30/06 from Jay Schlothaur CC: File SDP 2008 -0056 J t COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 [SDP200800056, WPO200800033] Plan preparer: The Timmons Group fax 295 -8317 Owner or rep.: Weather Hill Development, LLC fax 296 -2560 Plan received date: 25 March 2008 Date of comments: 9 May 2008 Reviewer: Phil Custer The site, SWM, and ESC plans for Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 have been reviewed. The plans cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following changes. A. Final Site Plan [SDP- 2008 - 000561 1. Please provide a benchmark on the plan with a set elevation. A benchmark is referred to but is not near the project area and must be shown on the plan. [DM] 2. Please specify a VDOT standard entrance for each site access point onto the roadway. 3. Sight distance does not appear to be shown to the VDOT standard for entrances onto the roadway. One hundred feet of sight distance is required for all internal intersections and not entrances onto VDOT ROW. 4. Please show the necessary walls and pillars from the structural plans for the garage on sheet S -1. The garage configuration and layout must be approved by the Zoning department in order to waive the ION internal sight distance requirement specified in our ordinance. 5. Please provide traffic control devices on the site. There appears to be several conflict points in the garage and surrounding drive aisle that may need signage. 6. The dumpster and loading space configurations are not currently acceptable to engineering review. The dump trucks and vehicles using the loading spaces will not be permitted to back out into the roadway. The loading spaces also cannot block the dumpsters. [18- 32.7.2] 7. Please provide greater detail with regards to grading throughout the site, specifically of the garage, courtyard, and access aisles from the roadway to the garage. Entrances cannot exceed 4% for the first 40' from the intersected street. Across the garage there appears to be a vertical drop of l Ott. 8. Please provide more detail in reference to the "stairs to elevator" specified on sheet S -1. 9. Please provide more information regarding the drainage system around the buildings, in the plaza, and around the parking structure. Will the buildings have roofdrains taking runoff to the biofilter or is there an underground drainage system taking water around the parking structure? How is infiltrated water from the courtyard reaching the biotilter? Please also show the trenchdrains. 10. Please provide a section detail for the replacement of the paved pedestrian path. 11. Please do not provide an entrance from the VDOT ROW for the biotilter maintenance path. The access must be given from another entrance on site. 12. On all slopes steeper than 3:1, please specify a low - maintenance groundcover. [DM] 13. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. B. Stormwater Management Plan [WPO- 2008 - 000331 14. The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 15. The hydrologic characteristics of Post - Development Drainage area 1 are not reasonable. I do not see how the time of concentration increases from 16 minutes to 19 minutes. I believe a post - development time of concentration between 5 and 10 minutes would be much more reasonable. Please provide a breakdown of the C coefficient for the DA 1. It is likely that grassed area over the courtyard will be highly compacted and a coefficient of around 0.6, rather than 0.3, should be used. 16. Please submit a modified simple spreadsheet for DA 1. 17. The project area data seems to be incorrect in "Table 12. 18. Please provide a detention compliance summary. 19. Please remove any reference to the luckstone mix from the biofilter detail. The county now requires that the biofilter mix meets the approved state standard. 20. Please provide 1 f freeboard of the 100 -year storm in the biofilter facility. 21. The post - development drainage area does not appear to be accurate. 22. The planting plan for the biofilter should be amended. All required plantings should be provided in the bed area. Based on the bed area of the facility, there should be close to 83 trees /shrubs while maintaining a tree to shrub ratio between 2:1 and 3:1. Please adjust the "R -ARA" typo in the lower right corner of the planting detail for the biofilter. 23. The minimum pipe size out of the facility is 15 ". [DM] 24. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. 25. Please submit signed copy of the Storcnwater Maintenance Agreement and $17 fee to the County. 26. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan IWPO- 2008 - 000331 27. Please remove the "Silt Trap to Biofilter Conversion detail ". The detail shown in the Stormwater management sheet is acceptable and another detail does not need to be included in the ESC plan. 28. Please provide a soil stockpile area. 29. Please show the outlet to the sediment trap to scale. 30. How is site runoff flowing out of the sediment trap to pass the paved pedestrian path? A method to pass the pedestrian path should be accounted for in the ESC plan. 31. In the construction sequence, please move the biofilter conversion step to the end of the sequence and note the conversion is only authorized by the County Water Protection Inspector. 32. Please do not show tree protection fencing within the dripline of trees. On the northern side of the property, it may be best to put the fencing south of the paved pathway. Please note that ARB requirement for tree protection fencing is 5ft from the dripline of a protected tree. Please coordinate ESC with ARB tree conversation plans. 33. Please move the construction entrance into the watershed of the sediment trap and provide a diversion on the northside of the CE direction water into the trap. 34. Please replace the silt fence on the western portion of the property with a diversion direction water into the sediment trap. 35. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. 36. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. 0,F A1, 1 t ifcrte COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Memorandum To: Ammy George, Tinunons Group From: Lisa Glass, Principal Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development Date: June 19, 2008 Subject: SDP 08 -56: Wickham Pond, Phase I1, Block 2: Final Site Plan June 4, 2008 Revised Plan The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be granted tentative approval from the Current Development Planner when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The Site Plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Please continue to work with each reviewer for all Tentative Approvals. The May 2, 2008 Planner comments have mostly been addressed, except the four below. Please address these four concerns and send a plan to Bill Fritz. Final review of these items will allow the Current Development Planner to grant tentative approval. Comment 7: Please confirm that underground parking garage will have a hard surface (paved/concrete /hard surface pavers), please add a note to the plan. Comment 11: How many of the parallel spaces are "off- site" on block 1? Refer to the Timmons letter submitted June 4, 2008, "Clarification of Changes: Wickham Pond ph 2 blocks 1 & 2 "; Item 1 discusses parallel parking on block 1, to be used in the parking calculation for block 2. Please check the parking space count to see if any spaces for block 2 are on block l; Add a note on the parking schedule to clarify where the parallel parking for block 2 is located (if off -site, say so; if on -site, note not needed). Comment 13: the lighting note states full cut off and not more that .5 fc at PL or street.... okay. However, by section 4.17 we need either a photometric plan or a statement that no lights >3000 lumens to be installed. Comment 15: Engineering will want to look at the size for the holding tank for sump /grinder pump to remove drainage from the underground garage. As well as providing vehicular access to the pump for maintenance. Please discuss with Engineering reviewer. I will not be available to answer questions, but since we discussed them today I hope you have no problem adding three notes and working with Engineering for the last item on my list. Tentative approvals must be obtained from all reviewers prior to final plan approval. Good Luck. OF'Ik- , ai. RQm e COUNTY OF U BEMARLE Department of Community Development 441 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22942 -4596 Comment 11: How many of the parallel spaces are "off- site" on block 1 ? Refer to the Timmons letter submitted June 4, 2008, "Clarification of Changes: Wickham Pond ph 2 blocks I 2 "; Item I discusses parallel parking on block 1, to be used in the parking calculation for block 2. Please check the parking space count to see if any spaces for block 2 are on block 1; Add a note on the v parking schedule to clarify where the parallel parking for block 2 is located (if off-site, say so; if on -site,4 ;-S- note not needed). J\ L.I'mment 13: the lightingpote stat_ 11 cut off d not more that .5 fc at PL or street.... okay. However, by section 4.17 we need either a photometric p or statement that no lights >3000 lumens to be installed. - --- -- Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Meinoraadum ptt Li'Y114 05 —16 To: Ammy George, Timmons Group 0(p From: Lisa Glass, Principal Planner Ult'_dV & Division: Zoning and Current Development NtV1urlL' P l Date: June 19, 2008 Subject: SDP 08 -56: Wickham Pond, Phase I1, Block 2: Final Site Plan June 4, 2008 Revised Plan The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be granted tentative approval from the Current Development Planner when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The Site Plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Please continue to work with each reviewer for all Tentative Approvals. The May 2, 2008 Planner continents have mostly been addressed, except the four below. Please address these four concerns and send a plan to Bill Fritz. Final review of these items will allow the Current Development Planner to grant tentative approval. comment 7: Please confirm that underground parking garage will have a hard surface (pave& surface pavers); please add a note to the plan. Comment 15: Engineering will want to look at the size for the holding tank for sump/grinder pump tot1 ? remove drainage from the underground garage. As well as providing vehicular access to the pump for maintenance. Please discuss with Engineering reviewer. I will not be available to answer questions, but since we discussed them today I hope you have no problem adding three notes and working with Engineering for the last item on my list. Tentative approvals must be obtained from all reviewers prior to final plan approval. Good Luck. Q i5 it a K V I tl Sly LeC9 i ; } (j M t 4V CAW I Application #: L SDP200800056 Short Review Comments Project Name:# Pond (Phase II -Block 2) -Final Date Completed: 04/23/2008 Reviewer: Brent Nelson Final 7- Residential 7- Administrative J ARB Review Status: Approved Reviews Comments: ! ARB 07 -58, Wickham Pond II, Block 2 was approved on 8 -30 -07 (see posted approval). Subsequent additions or revisions to the site plan that were not reviewed by the ARB (or conflict with the approved plan) will require review /approval from ARB staff. Applicant should provide drawings clearly denotingallsuchchanges. i Some issues identified: The dumpster enclosure shown adjacent to the north elevation of Building B is not part of the ARB approval and would not be approved by staff due to its proximity to the EC. Approved hedgerow plantings, adjacent to Route 240, are not labeled. Date Completed Reviewer: Approved street trees on the east side of Wickham Place and the south side of Wickham Way are not labeled on the landscape plan. The installation of these trees is required prior to the completion of Phase II - Block 2. 06/11/2008 Brent Nelson 1:7:3 Review Status: Approved Reviews Comments: 'ARB 07 -58, Wickham Pond II, Block 2 was approved on 8- 30 -07. Subsequent additions or revisions to the site plan that were not reviewed by the ARB (or conflict with the approved plan) will require review /approval from ARB staff. Applicant should provide drawings clearly denoting all such changes. Date Completed: 10/09/2008 Reviewer: Brent Nelson ARB Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: ,Sheet 12 Landscape Plan: plantings on the east side of Wickham Place Road need to be identified. i They were approved as Quercuc Phellos 'Hightower'. Sheet 12 Landscape Plan: plantings on the south side of Wickham Way need to be identified. They were approved as Tilia Cordata 'Greenspire'. Sheet 12 Landscape Plan: Hedgerow landscaping needs species identified. In the approved plan this iwas a proposed hedgerow with the proposed species identifi Date Completed: 06/16/2008 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Based on plans revised May 8, 2008. I No comments or conditions. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Friday, October 10, 2008 A 1"13 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 [SDP200800056, WP0200800033] Plan preparer: The Timmons Group fax 295 -8317 Owner or rep.: Weather Hill Development, LLC fax 296 -2560 Plan received date: 25 March 2008 04 June 2008 (Revl) Date of comments: 9 May 2008 21 July 2008 (Rev1) Reviewer: Phil Custer Jonathan Sharp (Revl) [phone: 566 -2578] The site, SWM, and ESC plans for Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 have been reviewed. The plans cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following changes. The proposed site plan is incomplete. The underground parking structure has not been designed (only a layout has been provided). Proposed grading and structure information (walls, columns, elevations) must be provided for the underground parking structure in order to verify that the plans meet all applicable Zoning Ordinances. A. Final Site Plan 3. Sight distance does not appear to be shown to the VDOT standard for entrances onto the roadway. One hundred feet of sight distance is required for all internal intersections and not entrances onto VDOT ROW. Rev]: Adequate sight distances should be provided on Wickham Way. 4. Please show the necessary walls and pillars from the structural plans for the garage on sheet S -1. The garage configuration and layout must be approved by the Zoning department in order to waive the 100ft internal sight distance requirement specified in our ordinance. Rev]: The plans still do not show whether or not all parking and travelway ordinances are met, as the elevations of the garage and die footprint of the underground parking structure are not shown. Only the travelway widths and parking dimensions appear to meet the ordinances. One hundred foot sight distances and grade restrictions will need to be maintained unless a waiver is granted from the Zoning Administrator. Please show the footprint for the design of the underground parking garage, including the location of walls, columns, footers, etc. as these will affect sight distances. All proposed grading on site is required, including grading for the underground parking structure. [18- 32.6.6b, h6J 5. Please provide traffic control devices on the site. There appears to be several conflict points in the garage and surrounding drive aisle that may need signage. Rev]: comments not addressed. Traffic control design for all parking areas must be provided Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 4 prior to final site plan approval. 6. The dumpster and loading space configurations are not currently acceptable to engineering review. The dump trucks and vehicles using the loading spaces will not be permitted to back out into the roadway. The loading spaces also cannot block the dumpsters. [18- 32.72] Rev]: I am unsure as to how underground trash collection will work. Will there not be a dumpster? Underground parking garages tend to have very low ceilings and garbage trucks would not be able to pick the dumpsters up. [18- 32.7.2] 7. Please provide greater detail with regards to grading throughout the site, specifically of the garage, courtyard, and access aisles from the roadway to the garage. Entrances cannot exceed 4% for the first 40' from the intersected street. Across the garage there appears to be a vertical drop of l Oft. Rev]: comments not addressed Proposed grading is required All proposed grading for travelways and parking areas must meet zoning ordinances. [18- 32.6.6b] 8. Please provide more detail in reference to the "stairs to elevator" specified on sheet S -1. Rev]: All proposed grading should be shown. Any drops of 4' or greater require safety railing.DMJ 9. Please provide more information regarding the drainage system around the buildings, in the plaza, and around the parking structure. Will the buildings have roofdrains taking runoff to the biofilter or is there an underground drainage system taking water around the parking structure? How is infiltrated water from the courtyard reaching the biofilter? Please also show the trenchdrains. Rev]: The plans indicate that Post DA 4 and 6 are piped to structure 163, but no pipes or drains have been provided 10. Please provide a section detail for the replacement of the paved pedestrian path. Rev]: comments not addressed 13. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. a. (Revl) Engineering recommends redesigning the concrete area between buildings C and D, as the grade is shown at 10 %. Is there a reason why the elevation at building C is at 654? What is the crest elevation of Wickham Place adjacent to building C? The elevation at building C could be lowered to provide a more suitable grade between buildings C and D. b. Engineering recommends directing drainage away from the proposed "stairs to underground parking garage." B. Stormwater Management Plan 14. The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved. Rev]: The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved 16. Please submit a modified simple spreadsheet for DA 1. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 4 Rev]: Please provide adequate Water Quality Calculations for the entire site (calculations have only been provided for the area draining toward Three Notched Road). During the rezoning, was it the intent to provide additional water quality for Wickham Pond Phase ]I block 2? If so, adequate water quality measures should be provided per the rezoning. Otherwise, water quality is provided per payment of a pro rata share to the Lickinghole Basin. 18. Please provide a detention compliance summary. Rev]: Detention computations are required. If detention is provided offsite, please provide calculations verifying that the offsite facilities are adequately providing detention for the proposed site. 24. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. Rev]: A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved 25. Please submit signed copy of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and $17 fee to the County. Rev]: Please provide easements for the use of the offsite SWM facilities. 26. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 28. Please provide a soil stockpile area. Rev]: The stockpile area is shown in a location of cut (for the underground parking structure). Where will all the excess cut be stockpiled? There does not appear to be enough room offite asshown. 29. Please show the outlet to the sediment trap to scale. Rev]: comments not addressed 30. How is site runoff flowing out of the sediment trap to pass the paved pedestrian path? A method to pass the pedestrian path should be accounted for in the ESC plan. Rev]: comments not addressed Adequate downstream channels should be provided from the outlet of the sediment trap while the sediment trap is in place. At a minimum, an adequate channel should be provided to the existing ditch below. Albemarle Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 4 of 4 35. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. Rev]: A bond antount will be computed by t/te County when the plans have been approved 36. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. a. (Revl) Outlet protection in Phase I of the ESC plans is shown outside the limits of disturbance. b. (Revl) Please show a Construction Entrance (CE) and limits of disturbance on phase II of the ESC plans. c. (Revl) The plans show proposed grading and improvements for Wickham Pond Phase II Block 1 as existing. The proposed ESC plans may not work if construction begins prior to the completion of Block 1. d. (Revl) The proposed sediment basin is very close in proximity to the construction of the proposed underground parking structure. The plans may need to revised to avoid ESC measures in the way of construction or grading. e. (Revl) As the proposed buildings and structures are very close to the proposed Wickham Place and Wickham Way and encompass the majority of the back half of the site, construction access and coordination may be required in the right -of -way. If Block 1 is constructed prior to Block 2, cordination may be required to divert traffic through Wickham Pond Phase 1 during the construction of Block 2. f. (Revl) Please provide adequate channel calculations for the outfall following structure 403 and for the pipe systems from stuctures 127 and 163 to the pond in phase 1. [MS -191 Alen_ Awl rRGIN COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 [SDP200800056, WP0200800033] Plan preparer: The Timmons Group fax 295 -8317 Owner or rep.: Weather Hill Development, LLC fax 296 -2560 Plan received date: 25 March 2008 04 June 2008 (Revl) Date of comments: 9 May 2008 21 July 2008 (Revl) Reviewer: Phil Custer Jonathan Sharp (Revl) [phone: 566 -2578] The site, SWM, and ESC plans for Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 have been reviewed. The plans cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following changes. The proposed site plan is incomplete. The underground parking structure has not been designed (only a layout has been provided). Proposed grading and structure information (walls, columns, elevations) must be provided for the underground parking structure in order to verify that the plans meet all applicable Zoning Ordinances. A. Final Site Plan 1. Please provide, a benclamt on the plan with a set elevation. A benchmark is refel to but is not near the project area and must he shown on the plan. [1.)141] Rev]: Cominews addressed. I Please specify a VDur standard entrance for each site access paint onto the roadway. Revl: c-on €niew addressed, 3. Sight distance does not appear to be shown to the VDOT standard for entrances onto the roadway. One hundred feet of sight distance is required for all internal intersections and not entrances onto VDOT ROW. Rev]: Adequate sight distances should be provided on Wickham Way. 4. Please show the necessary walls and pillars from the structural plans for the garage on sheet S -1. The garage configuration and layout must be approved by the Zoning department in order to waive the 100ft internal sight distance requirement specified in our ordinance. Rev]: The plans still do not show whether or not all parking and travelway ordinances are met, as the elevations of the garage and the footprint of the underground parking structure are not shown. Only the travelway widths and parking dimensions appear to meet the ordinances. One hundred foot sight distances and grade restrictions will need to be maintained unless a waiver is granted from the Zoning Administrator. Please show the footprint for the design of the underground parking garage, including the location of walls, columns, footers, etc. as these will affect sight distances. All proposed grading on site is required, including grading for the underground parking structure. [18- 32.6.6b, h6] 5. Please provide traffic control devices on the site. There appears to be several conflict points in the garage and surrounding drive aisle that may need signage. Rev]: comments not addressed. Traffic control design for all parking areas must be provided Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 4 prior to final site plan approval. 6. The dumpster and loading space configurations are not currently acceptable to engineering review. The dump trucks and vehicles using the loading spaces will not be permitted to back out into the roadway. The loading spaces also cannot block the dumpsters. [ 18- 32.7.2] Rev]: I am unsure as to how underground trash collection will work. Will there not be a dumpster? Underground parking garages tend to have very low ceilings and garbage trucks would not be able to pick the dumpsters up. [18- 32.7.21 7. Please provide greater detail with regards to grading throughout the site, specifically of the garage, courtyard, and access aisles from the roadway to the garage. Entrances cannot exceed 4% for the first 40' from the intersected street. Across the garage there appears to be a vertical drop of 1Oft. Rev]: comments not addressed. Proposed grading is required. All proposed grading for travelways and parking areas must meet zoning ordinances. [18- 32.6.6b] 8. Please provide more detail in reference to the "stairs to elevator" specified on sheet S -1. Rev]: All proposed grading should be shown. Any drops of 4' or greater require safety railing. DMI 9. Please provide more information regarding the drainage system around the buildings, in the plaza, and around the parking structure. Will the buildings have roofdrains taking runoff to the biofilter or is there an underground drainage system taking water around the parking structure? How is infiltrated water from the courtyard reaching the biofilter? Please also show the trenchdrains. Rev]: The plans indicate that Post DA 4 and 6 are piped to structure 163, but no pipes or drains have been provided. D X 1 fy. ?0- 10. Please provide a s ' n Mail for the replacement of the paved pedestrian path. Rev]: cons s not addressed. I l . Please do not provide an entrance frorn the VD07 ROW , for the biofilter maintenance path. The access roast he 'liven from another entrance on site. Rev/: comments addressed. 12. On all Slopes steeper than 3:'1, please specify alow- maintenance groundcover. [I)N- 1 Rev]: co mntcrrts addressed, 13. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. a. (Revl) Engineering recommends redesigning the concrete area between buildings C and D, as the grade is shown at 10 %. Is there a reason why the elevation at building C is at 654? What is the crest elevation of Wickham Place adjacent to building C? The elevation at building C could be lowered to provide a more suitable grade between buildings C and D. b. Engineering recommends directing drainage away from the proposed "stairs to underground parking garage." B. Stormwater Management Plan 14. The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved. Rev]: The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved. 15. The hydrolooic ch aracteri sties of Post - Development Drainage area I are not rea%onable, i do not see how the tithe of concentration increases f oni 16 minutes to 19 lnirrutcs. 1 believe a post - development time of concentration between 5 and 10 tnintrtes would be touch more. reasonable. Please provide a breakdown of the C coefficient for the DA 1. It is likely that grassed area over the courtyard will be highly compacted and a co fficient of :around 0.6. rather than 0-3—should be used. Revl: c:c inments addressecl. 16. Please submit a modified simple spreadsheet for DA 1. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 4 Rev]: ease provide adequate Water Quality Calculations for the entire site (calculations have only een provided for the area draining toward Three Notched Road). During the rezoning,W it the intent to provide additional water quality for Wickham Pond Phase II block 2? If so, dequate water quality measures should be provided per the rezoning. Otherwise, water qualityisprovidedperpaymentofaproratasharetotheLiekingholeBasin. 17. The project area data seems to be incorrect in 'Fable 12. Revs: comments addre.i -see, 18. Please provide a detention compliance summary. Rev]: Detention computations are required. If detention is provided offsite, please provide calculations verifying that the offsite facilities are adequately providing detention for theproposedsite. 19. Plk <ase remove any reference; to the lucksi.ont mix from the biofilter detail. ibe; c•otlnty jjowrequiresthatthebiofiltermixineetstheapprovedstatestandard. Revl ::,°<emments addressed. 20. Please provide 1 ft freeboard of the 100 -yeas , torrn in the biofilter facility. Revll: c:oinrnews addressed 21. The post devek>pjrtent drainage area does not appear to be accurate. Revl: coninwntsudclresscxi. 22. The planting plan for the bicafilter should be atnendt d. All required PIN ntings sl ould be providedinthebedarea. Based on the bed area of the facility, there should be close to 83 trees /shrubs while maintaining a. tree to shrub ratio between 2:1 and 11. Please: adjust the "R- ;112A" typo inthelower601tcornerOftheplantingdetailforthebisafilter. Re t l: comnienisaddress'c:d 23. The minimum pipe size one (-)t'tile 1a.cility is iS' [ Reel: t onmienis a( ° 24. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. Rev-1: A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved.25. Please submit signed copy of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and $17 fee to the County.Revl: Please provide easements for the use of the offsite S WMfacilities. 26. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 27, Please renlove the "Silt. Trap to Biofilter Conversion de tail ". The detail show ill the Stormwater managentent sheet is acceptable and another detail doers not need tO he included in the ESC pluln.Ret c oninie talc addressed 28. Please provide a soil stockpile area. Rev]: The stockpile area is shown in a location of cut (for the underground parking structure).Where will all the excess cut be stockpiled? There does not appear to be enough room onsite asshown. - -\ w Ot^ -"1. or 29. Please show the outlet to t e sediment trap to scale. Rev]: comments not addressed. 30. How is site runoff flowing out of the sediment trap to pass the paved pedestrian path? A method to pass the pedestrian path should be accounted for in the ESC plan. Rev]: comments not addressed. Adequate downstream channels should be provided from theoutletofthesedimenttrapwhilethesedimenttrapisinplace. At a minimum, an adequatechannelshouldbeprovidedtotheexistingditchbelow. 31. to the construction seytience-, please l"Ove the biofilter conversion stela to the end of the sequenceandnotetheconversionisojilyauthorizedbythe. County Water Protection Inspector.Re4: coninients raddresst,d, Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 4 of 4 32. Please do not show tree protection fencing within the dripline of trees. On the northern side ot'the property, it may be best to put the fencing ,outh (if the paved pathway. Please note that ARB requirement for tree protection fencing is 5ft frorn the dripline of .1 protected tree. Please coordinate ESC with ARB tree conver4ation plans. Rtwl: commoils addressed. 33. Please move the construction entrance into the watershed of the sediment trap and provide a diversion on the nordiside of the (".E direction water into the trap, Rev I: comineras addressed. 34. Please replace the silt fence on the western portion of the property with a diversion direction water into the sediment trap, Ret comments uddressed. 35. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. Rev]: A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. 36. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal due to the required changes. a. (Revl) Outlet protection in Phase I of the ESC plans is shown outside the limits of disturbance. b. (Revl) Please show a Construction Entrance (CE) and limits of disturbance on phase 11 of the ESC plans. c. (Revl) The plans show proposed grading and improvements for Wickham Pond Phase 11 Block 1 as existing. The proposed ESC plans may not work if construction begins prior to the completion of Block 1. d. (Revl) The proposed sediment basin is very close in proximity to the construction of the proposed underground parking structure. The plans may need to revised to avoid ESC measures in the way of construction or grading. e. (Revl) As the proposed buildings and structures are very close to the proposed Wickham Place and Wickham Way and encompass the majority of the back half of the site, construction access and coordination may be required in the right-of-way. If Block I is constructed prior to Block 2, cordination may be required to divert traffic through Wickham Pond Phase I during the construction of Block 2. f. (Revl) Please provide adequate channel calculations for the outfall following structure 403 and for the pipe systems from stuctures 127 and 163 to the pond in phase I. [MS-19] Y IJ C,1.Y /1- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottes Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: Wickham Pond Phase'—? Block 2 Plan preparer: The Timmons Group Owner or rep.: Charlotte B. Dammann Plan received date: 25 March 2008 SDP200800056, W1 U-1 June 2008 (Rer1) 14 August 2008 (Rev2) Date of comments: 9 May 2008 21 Juh 2008 (Rev]) 22 September (Rev2) Reviewer: Phil Custer Jonathan Sharp (Reel) Phil Custer (Rev2) The site, SWM, and ESC plans for Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2 have been reviewed. The plans cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following changes. A. Final Site Plan 4. Please show the necessary walls and pillars from the structural plans for the garage on sheet S -1. The garage configuration and layout must be approved by the Zoning department in order to waive the l 00ft internal sight distance requirement specified in our ordinance. Rev]: The plans .dill do not Shod' whether or not all parking and travehra'v OrdinanceS (11'e met, (IS the elevations of the garage and lhe, fc/olprint of the underground parkitW structure are not Shown. Onh the traveliva widths and parking dimensions appear to sleet the ordinances. One hunched foot sight distances and grade restrictions will heed to he maintained Unless a waiver is granted from the ZoningAdminisiralor. Please show the fbolprini the design ref the underground parking garage, including the location ofwalls, cohlinns,.fboters. etc. as these will affect sight distances. A11 propertied grading on site is required, includinggrading for the Iindergroiind parking structure. [18- 32.6.6h, h6] Rev2: Please remove the note on .sheet 3 referencing the garage layout being subject to change. Replace these three sentences with a note stating "Any deviation front this site plan will require an amendment to be approved by the county. " Please also inchide this note on sheet 3. Many of the parking spaces are not I Sft in length due to the diameter of the columns. Engineering Albemarre County Community Development Engineering Review Continents Page 2 of 5 review (foes not support a waiver of this requirement. 5. Please provide traffic control devices on the site. There appears to be several conflict points in the garage and surrounding drive aisle that may need signage. Rev!: conlnlents not cidclressed. Traffic control design for clll p(Irking urecis must he provided Prior In final site plan approl'c11. Rev2: Please provide signs spec•if} the advisory speed inside the garage is 5ntph. This is a condition of the waiver of the sight distance requirement in the parking garage.6. The dumpster and loading space configurations are not currently acceptable to engineering review. The dump trucks and vehicles using the loading spaces will not be permitted to back out into the roadway. The loading spaces also cannot block the dumpsters. [ 18- 32.7.2] Rer1: 1 am unsure as to hou underw trash collection ~rill work. Will there not he (i dumpster" Underground parking garages tend to have VerV loll' c•eilin,s and garbage trucks would not he able to pick the dllmpsters 111). [18-32 . 7 . 2] Rev2: The ordinance specifies that the loading spaces must have a clearance height of 14.Sft. It is clear that the garage does not have this height. [18- 4.12.181 The county would like more ittforntattion regarding the waste disposal plan for this site. The areas for trash collection appear too small considering the residential and contnterc•ial units on site. Please also address the county's concern that the trash truck may he ton tallfor the garage. Please provide sections estimating the height required from the lowest bean in the garage to the finished floors and the courtyard. 7. Please provide greater detail with regards to grading throughout the site, specifically of the garage, courtyard, and access aisles from the roadway to the garage. Entrances cannot exceed 4% for the first 40" from the intersected street. Across the garage there appears to be a vertical drop of 1 Oft. Rev 1: comments not addressed. Proposed grueling is required. All proposed grading for h'al'e lx'al's and parking areas "'list ineet zonnlg ordinances. [IN Rev2. Travelway grades cannot exceed 10'% measured at any location on the travelway. The county will not require the full landing requirement of 4(ft lit 4 % Only 20ft at 4% will he needed at each entrance. The eastern travelway also appears to conflict with Building B. Allgradechangesshouldhaveareasonableverticalcurve. 8. Please provide more detail in reference to the "stairs to elevator specified on sheet S -1. Rev]: All proposed grading should be shown. AnV drops o0 ' or greater require sakti railing.D I] Rev2: Show the grading around the tra velwatys into the garage with relation to the surrounding grades in the grass. It appears that walls are needed in both entrances. Please provide walldetailswiththesafetyrailingasrequired. 9. Please provide more information regarding the drainage system around the buildings, in the plaza, and around the parking structure. Will the buildings have roofdrains taking runoff to the biotilter or is there an underground drainage system taking water around the parking structure? How is infiltrated water from the courtyard reaching the biotilter? Please also show the trenchdrains. Rerl: The plans indicate that Post DA 4 and 6 [ire piped tl) sirllc•tllre 163, hilt no pipes or drainshavebeenprovided. Rev2: Please provide more detail regarding the parking garage drainage system and grinder pump. This system will be subject to the approval of the county engineer. 10. Please provide a section detail for the replacement of the paved pedestrian path. Rev]: comments not addressed. Rev2: The applicant bus provided a detail far sidewalks. The sidewalk detail should include the strength requirement of 3000psi at 28 days. A detail for the replaced pedestrian path (alongRoute240thatisdisrupted61' the TSD) is still needed Albemar'rtCounty Community Development Engineering Review Continents Page 3 of 5 13. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the nest submittal due to the required changes. a. (Rev I) Engineering recommends redesigning the concrete area between buildings C and D, as the grade is shown at 10 %. Is there a reason why the elevation at building C is at 654? What is the crest elevation of Wickham Place adjacent to building C? The elevation at building C could be lowered to provide a more suitable grade between buildings C and D. Rev. 2) Water is directed towards Building D. Please amend the grading. B. Stormwater Management Plan 14. The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approved. Revd.- The Lickinghole SIVAI basin pro -rater ft e will be computed once the site plan has been approved. Rev2: The Lickinghole SWM basin pro -rata fee will be computed once the site plan has been approver. 18. Please provide a detention compliance sununary. Reel: Detention computations are required. Ifdetenlion is provided olfsite, please provide calelrlcrtiotts verifi that the offsite k'ilities Cue adegtrately providing detention fur the proposed site. Rev2: Comment not addressed. Please subfnit calculations and all otter exhibits showing detention compliance. This plan has a separate file and should be exclusive of other files. The calculations should reflect the latest proposed conditions. AlbemaMrCounty Community Development Engineering Review Continents Page 4 of 5 24. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. Rev]: A bond uniount will be computed by the C'ountl when the plans have been approved. Rev2: A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. 25. Please submit signed copy of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and $17 fee to the County. Rev l: Please provide easements fur the use ofthe offsite SWAT facilities. Rev2: Comment has not been addressed. The Block 2 site plan cannot be approved until a plat is approved showing the stormwater management easement for the pond and all necessary drainage easements. C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 28. Please provide a soil stockpile area. Rev]: The stockpile area is shown in a location of cut (for the underground parking structure). Where will ul1 the excess cut he stockpiled.' There does not appear to he enough 1.00171 onSite us shown. Rev2: To the note in the construction sequence, please add that the offsite location needs to have an approver/ ESC plan and the ESC inspector needs to be notified Please update the Offsite Areas" section of the narrative to include all of t {cis information. 30. How is site runoff flowing out of the sediment trap to pass the paved pedestrian path? A method to pass the pedestrian path should be accounted for in the ESC plan. Rev l: coinlnents not addressed. Adequate dotirnstreanr channels should he provided the outlet of the .sediment trap while the sediment true is in place. At a nrininnrnr, ern adequate channel should he provided to the existing ditch below. Rev2: Please specify a diameter to the slope drain. The slope drain should go cooler the trail so users of the trail do not have an obstacle to avoid Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Page 5 of 5 35. A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved. Rcvl: A bond antounl will he computed by the C'ouniti when 1he plans have been approved. Rev2: A bond amount will be computed by the County when the plans have been approved 36. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the nest submittal due to the required changes. a. (Rev I) Outlet protection in Phase I of the ESC plans is shown outside the limits of disturbance. Rev2) The temporary slope drain should be included in the limits of disturbance. The slope drain should be placed underneath the paved pedestrian path so as not to disturb use of the path. d. (Rev] ) The proposed sediment basin is very close in proximity to the construction of the proposed underground parking structure. The plans may need to revised to avoid ESC measures in the way of construction or grading. Rev2) Comment has not been addressed The edge of the sediment trap (elevation 538) is located 10ft from the inside wall of the garage. Considering the thickness of the wall section and the depth of the foundation in relation to the elevation of the trap grading, the sediment will be an obstacle during the construction of the garage and should be modified RevI ) Please provide adequate channel calculations for the outfall following structure 403 and for the pipe systems from stuctures 127 and 163 to the pond in phase 1. [MS -l9] Rev2) Comment has not been addressed A drainage area ntap .supporting the pipe calculations should be submitted with this MS -19 analysis. Also, no channel calculations the ditch west of structure 401 were submitted Page 1 of 2 Philip Custer From: Ammy George [Ammy.George @timmons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:06 AM To: Bill Fritz Cc: Philip Custer; Frank Pohl Subject: FW: SDP08 -56 Wickham ph2 block 2 Good morning Bill, Phil Custer brought it to my attention that I did not include a response letter to Lisa Glass's outstanding comments to Wickham Pond Phase 2 Block 2. We addressed her comments in the plan set that wasdeliveredtotheCountyonAugust20, 2008. Bill, here are out responses to the comments from Lisa. If you did not receive a copy of the revised plan, inAugust, let me know how many copies you will need and I will get them over to you. `r,m1 J i We have added a note about the flooring for the garage on Sheet 3. 'r06 \- Qa . 2. A clarification of the number of parallel spaces for Block 2 has been dded to Sheet 5. 3- The lighting note has been updated to clarify that if lighting is added in the future, it shall not exceed 3,000 lumens. (Sheet 5) 4. The grinder pump and location will be designed by the structural engineer at a later date. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me. Ammy George, CLA c- Tinnnons Group Your v 1s1,,rr Our, 919 2nd St., S.E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.327.1684 (Direct) 434.566.3411 (Cell) 434.295.8317 (Fax) Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail From: Lisa K. Glass [mai Ito: lglass2 @albemarle.org] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:41 PM To: Ammy George Subject: SDP08 -56 Wickham ph2 block 2 Ammy, Lets discuss thes items so it is clear for the next planner to give you approval! I am about out of this office!) Thank you for your letter of June 2 and plan dated June 4. you have addressed most of the planning /zoning comments. I have a few remaining questions: 1) comment 7: Please confirm that underground parking garage will have a hard surface (paved /concrete /hardsurfacepavers); add a note; 2) comment 11: How may of the parallel spaces are "Off- site" on block 1 ?; add a note on the parking schedule after parallel; 3) comment 13: the lighting not you added says full cut off; and not more that .5 fact at PL or street ... okay 9/17/2008 Page 2 of 2 add a note or provide a plan; I either need a photometric plan or a statement that no lights >3000 lumens to be installed' so not the building entry, garage entry or street lights ?) t/ does this make sense? 4) comment 15: Who sizes the holding tank for sump /grinder pump to remove drainage from the underground rage?V> ngineering will want to look at this. well as providing vehicular access to the pump for maintenance. want to be sure you understand these comments before I put these notes in the file. If we can talk later today or Tuesday morning. Lisa 296 -5832 x3432 9/17/2008 t L r County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Ammy George- Timmons Group Charlotte Dammann- Barnes - Crozet LLC Frank Pohl- Weatherhill Development From: Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner Division: Zcyiing & Current Development Date: October 3, 2008 Subject: SDP 200800056 Wickham Pond Phase 11 Block 2 The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development has reviewed the latest final site plan revisions for the above reference project,dated 08- 05 -08, and will approve the site plan referenced above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following continents are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] L [Sec. 32.5.6 j, 11 It appears that some, but not all, existing utility and drainage easements are shown on the existing conditions sheet. Please show and label all existing utility and drainage easements on Sheet 2. 2. [32.5.6a] While zoning is provided on Sheet 5, it is difficult to find as it provided under the category of "Tax Map Nos." Please provide the category header of "Zoning" for the zoning information on Sheet 5. 3. [32.5.6b] Please explicitly provide the maximum amount of impervious cover on the site. 4. [32.5.6b] Please clarify parking schedule by noting that the 12,800 sf is the net floor area. 5. [32.5.6n] Please delineate on- street parking spaces. 6. [32.5.6p] Sheet 3 calls out the tot lot, community garden, and landscape bed areas. Please also provide this information on the landscape plan sheet. And, please clarify where the perennial bed detail is intended to be applied. 7. [32.5.611][32.7.7.11 You must provide a note on the plan that specifies the equipment to be provided in the tot lot. Please contact Elizabeth Marotta at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 x3432 if you have any questions or need additional information.