The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB201500183 Study 2016-02-19 Lc— Page / of OSE/PE Report For: ® Construction ® Repair I- Voluntary Upgrade ri Certification n Subdivision Permit Permit Permit Letter Approval Property Location: 911 Address: 1868 Ed Jones Rd. City: Scottsville Lot Section Subdivision GPIN or Tax Map# 115-41A Health Dept ID If Latitude Longitude Applicant or Client Mailing Address: Name: Ethel Harris Street: 1866 Ed Jones Rd City: Scottsville State VA Zip Code 24590 Prepared by: OSE Name Thomas G. Hogge License#1940-001091 Address PO Box 418 City Ruckersville State VA Zip Code22968 PE Name License# Address City State Zip Code Date of Report — /? /, Date of Revision#1 OSE/PE Job# Date of Revision#2 Contents/Index of this report(e.g.,Site Evaluation Summary,Soil Profile Descriptions,Site Sketch,Abbreviated Design,etc.) 1-cover 2,3-Site and Soil Evaluation Report 4-Site Sketch 5-Abbreviated Design Certification Statement I hereby certify that the evaluations and/or designs contained herein were conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations(12 VAC5-610),the Private Well Regulations(12 VAC5-630),the Regulations for Alternative Onsite Sewage Systems(12VAC5-613)and all other applicable laws,regulations and policies implemented by the Virginia Department of Health.I further certify that I currently possess any professional license required by the laws and regulations of the Commonwealth at have been duly issued by the applicable agency charged with licensure to perform the work contained herein. e work attached to this cover page has been conducted under an exemption to the practice of engineering,specifically the exemption in Code of Virginia Section 54.1-402.A.11 I recommend that a(select one): construction permit ❑certification letter ID subdivision approval Ejbe(select one) Issued ID epair permit 0 voluntary upgrade Q Denied g I 2 i Date OSE/PE 5i nature This form contains personal information subject to disc •s re under the Freedom of Information Act. Revised 12/1/2014 Page z.- of -.5 Site and Soil Evaluation Report VDH Use Only HDIN: General Information Date: a_ A-- / Albemarle County Health Department Owner: Ethel Harris Phone: Owner Address: 1866 Ed Jones Rd, Scottsville, VA 24590 Property Address: 1868 Ed Jones Road Tax Map/GPIN#: 115-41A Subdivision: Section: Block: Lot: Soil Information Summary 1. Position in landscape satisfactory: El Yes 0 No Describe landscape position: Sideslope 2. Slope: 16 3. Depth to rock/impervious strata: Max. 47 in. Min. 34 in. 0 Not observed 4. Free Water Present: 0 Yes E No Range in inches: 5. Depth to seasonal water table(gray mottling or gray color): inches El Not observed 6. Soil percolation rate estimated: El Yes 0 No Estimated rate: 55 min/in at 22 inches depth Texture Group: 0 1 0 [I 8 III 0 IV 7. Percolation test performed: D Yes El No If yes,provide additional data on percolation test results. Name and title of eva .:tor: Thomas Graham Hogge, OSE Signature: El Site approved: Absoptiontrenc es (describe dispersal area,e.g.absorption trenches)dispersing TL-3 Effluent (proposed level of treatment at time of evaluation)to be placed at 22 (inches)depth at site designated on permit. Site provides a total of 840 square feet of absorption area for primary and reserve(if applicable). 0 Site disapproved: Reasons for rejection(check all that apply) 1. 0 Position in landscape subject to flooding or periodic saturation. 2. 0 Insufficient depth of suitable soil over hard rock. 3. 0 Insufficient depth of suitable soil to seasonal water table. 4. 0 Rates of absorption too slow. 5. 0 Insufficient area of acceptable soil for required absorption area,and/or reserve area. 6. 0 Proposed system too close to well. 7. 0 Other(specify) This form contains personal information subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Revised 12/1/2014 Date of Evaluation: 2-10-16 Page of Profile Description SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Property ID: TM 115-41A Where the local health department conducts the soil evaluation the location of profile holes may be shown on the schematic drawing on the construction permit or the sketch submitted with the application. If soil evaluations are conducted by a private Onsite Soil Evaluator or Professional Engineer,location of profile holes and sketch of the area investigated including all structural features(i.e.sewage disposal systems,wells,etc.)within 100 feet of the site and reserve site shall be shown on the reverse side of this page or prepared on a separate page and attached to this form. 0 See a-plication sketch NI See Construction Permit 0 See sketch on reverse side or page attached to this form. Hole# Horizon Depth Description of color,texture,etc. Texture (Inches) Group 1 A 0-5 7.5 YR 4/4 brown loam Il Bt 5-20 2.5 YR 5/8 red,light,friable silty day loam,variegated with 2.5 YR 6/4 light reddish brown, Ill and 7.5 YR 6/3 light brown,with angular schist fragments C 20-46 5 YR 5/8 yellowish red silt loam schist saprolite with many angular schist fragments, Ill with 2.5 YR 5/6 red and 10 YR 6/6 brownish yellow;auger refusal at 46" 2 A 0-7 10 YR 4/3 brown loam II Bw 7-12 5 YR 5/6 yellowish red,very light silty day loam to silt loam,with angular schist fragments 111 C 12-34 5 YR 5/8 yellowish red silt loam schist saprolite with many angular schist fragments, III with 2.5 YR 5/6 red and 10 YR 6/6 brownish yellow;auger refusal at 34" 3 A 0-7 10 YR 5/6 yellowish brown loam II Bw 7-14 7.5 YR 4/6 strong brown,very light silty clay loam to silt loam Ip C 14-47 2.5 YR 5/4 reddish brown,friable silt loam schist saprolite,with 10 YR 5/6 yellowish III brown and 10 YR 8/3 very pale brown;auger refusal at 47" REMARKS: Deeper soil profiles may be discovered with use of a backhoe. This form contains personal information subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Revised 12/1/2014 Page V of.5 SITE SKETCH SHOWING PROPOSED RESERVE SEPTIC FOR PROPOSED DIVISION OF TAX MAP # 115-41A ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VA Nvr--ar *lc 30*- tit'••0 \cP 5c.,• 10- ci6" et 1:P\ sic> ---, et = . . ‘3r3 843C NO OTHER SEPTICS OR WELLS,EXISTING OR PROPOSED, ; ,..,, . . ....,- . 0 ,' WERE IDENTIFIED WITHIN 200 FEET. V* */ 46° ,foe'' ,3,,,,, .6„, " ,, ot , v „- - \ '''' ---- ,- * 0 \ ,...os,oc.- ,\‘. -- Vig:,,sc,1?,T- .." 4—...* ••..t:-., 4,,„ . 43--)-c, (14„ : 0 - ••/6 t• ,,-,,,c •e<9\ V Its, I • / _ 2 --,,-- ., tw, ,o, • . \ . - • - - , = • 5, - % HOGGE . ',(-,*. ' '‘'•'.I'''\' Ei'N. ll l -1 0 , , %PROPOSEDA" . .'#1g9..4-.i.SEPTIC 1 ) 4 '.:-Ikt... fr.... ,RESRVE \ IZ(vet 1ie '''-''' '-----;ill T.';':',3 .,,A- , -10•444-4tatel*-t 4,4Z(-)1• *".1, ' s'l , , ; 1 isE), \ '‘, ,t-Po 0' , 0''1' \1 i 1 '. • . .2 ..-- • \ -.., r q . ,- . ..,' 0-4' • 4-1.1:11Y sr \ \ " \ ,-... ...,", . . • \ ,.., ....,4 0 EX.SEPTIC • BACK HERE SCALE: 1" = 100' , p.....o,,,......."'am.%,.. .....ss..........:. BLUE RIDGE , AI\ LEGEND 0 Auger Boring SOIL CONSULTING, INC. ......_ * .3C Proposed Well Spot AUTHORIZED ONSITE SOIL EVALUATORS (AOSEs) Drainfield/Reserve Corner Stake PO.Box 418 Ruckersvdie.VA 22968 MA)985 27g Page- of Design Calculations Reserve Drainfield for 1868 Ed Jones Road Tax Map 115-41A Albemarle County, VA Design Basis A. Estimated Percolation Rate I 55 I @ I 22 I (Minutes per inch) B. Trench bottom square feet 185 ( 150GPD/0.81 GPD PER SQ.FT.) Required per Bedroom (from Table 5.4)based on ❑Gravity ❑LPD []other: *TL-3 EFFLUENT TO GRAVITY-DOSED TRENCHES,PER 12 VAC 5-613-10,REGULATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GMP 156,TL-3 EFFLUENT MUST BE PROVIDED BY AN APPROVED PROPRIETARY NITROGEN REMOVAL TREATMENT UNIT,PROVIDING A NET TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL(AT THE PROJECT BOUNDARY)OF 50%. C. Number of Bedrooms 3 Area Calculations: D. Length of Trench(ft.) ?0 E. Length of Available Area(ft.) I 70 I F. Width of Trench (ft.) I 3 I G. Number of Trenches I 4 I H. Center-to-center spacing(ft.) 10 I. Width required(ft.) I 33 I J. Width of available area(ft.) I 33 I K. Total square footage required I 555 I L. Square footage in design I 840 I NOTE: IT IS POSSIBLE THAT WITH THE USE OF A BACKHOE, DEEPER SOIL MAY BE REVEALED AND HENCE THE NEED FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM MIGHT BE ELIMINATED. IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE THAT ANOTHER AREA ON THE LOT MAY BE FOUND THAT MIGHT BE SUITABLE FOR A CONVENTIONAL DRAINFIELD.