The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800060 Review Comments 2008-05-077f3iti1 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 May 7, 2008 Pastor Bill Willis 1011 Elliot Avenue Charlottesville, VA 22902 Fax: 434.296.7235 RE: SDP2008 -60 1 Church of the Nazarene - Preliminary Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Historic Preservation) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Water Protection) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by May 19, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Summer Frederick Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development Application #:SDP200800060 Short Review ComL3nts Project Name: 1st Church of the Nazarene - Prel 1Preliminary - Non - residential Date Completed:05/02/2008 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: ENO OBJECTION. Date Completed: Reviewer:Josh Rubinstein Water Resources Manager Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: i For the SDP application to be considered complete, the applicant needs to pay the $400 Tier III Groundwater Assessment Fee by 1 May. Fee paid 4/23/08 Date Completed:05/05/2008 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: ;Based on plans dated March 2008. Provide an accessible route from the two barrier -free parking spaces on the north side of the site to a building entrance. IDue to the size of the building ( >12,000 sq. ft.), it must be provided with a fire sprinkler system. Show the provisions for this system on the site plan. Date Completed:04/24/2008 Reviewer:Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: 'I SRC 5/8/08 Submittal is blurry and hard to read. Plan appears to show some kind of retaining wall between the entrance road and parking area, but can not be deciphered. Please clarify proposal or move the road to allow for a gentle slope. Travelways between parking areas will need to be redesigned to 10% slopes or less. VDOT may require road improvements on Ste. Rte. 22. Health department approval required for drainfield locations. Date Completed:05/01/2008 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: 'This site falls within the Entrance Corridor. Consequently, ARB review and approval are required prior I to final plan approval. Applications, checklists, guidelines and schedules are available on line at www.albemarle.org. Date Completed:05/07/2008 Reviewer:Scott Clark Planning Review Status:Requested Changes Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 Reviews Comments: http: / /www.albemarle.org /upl ' mages /Forms Center) Departments /Board_of Supervisors /Form" - tion_Letters /20071212actions.pdf 1 have reviewed this site plan -- ;ompliance with the conditions of approval for SP 2007 - 00034, a.-.. ,roved by the Board of Supervisors on Dec. 12, 2007. See Attachment 2 of the document linked above for the full text of the conditions Condition 1: The requirements for scale appear to have been met. Condition 1(a): The entrance is obscured on the plan. Please revise the plan so that the required right turn lane is visible. Conditino 1(b): The dumpster area and grading nearby do not seem to meet the requirement for a 20 -foot undisturbed buffer in Section 21.7. This requirement should be met, or a possible waiver under 21.7.3 should be discussed. Condition 1(c): The parking limit is met. Condition 4 requires that "a lighting plan reasonably limiting the amount of adverse light pollutionshall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for approval as a condition of preliminary site plan approval." This site plan should not be signed before such a plan is approved. Condition 7 requires that the building be built to the general design shown at the Dec. 12, 2007 Board meeting, subject to modification by the Architectural Review Board. Page: 2.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 41J„JJ,,1 Service Auth‘rit TO: Summer Frederick FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: May 6, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Church of the Nazarene - Preliminary SDP200800060 TM 79 -10 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is not within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 16 inch water line is located on site. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. 4. A inch sewer line is located approximately distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: 16" butterfly valve is labeled as a water meter. Provide a profile of the existing and proposed grade over the 16" water line. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434977 -4511 • Fax (434)979-0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org 011th/sAftic 4.1 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Pastor Bill Willis From:Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division:Zoning & Current Development Date:May 5, 2008 Subject:SDP2008 -60 1st Church of the Nazarene - Preliminary The Planner /Engineer for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide a north point arrow and source of topography. 2. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(b)] Please provide maximum number of employees and maximum height of structures. 3. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(1)] Please show location of existing and /or proposed utility easements. 4. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(n)] Please provide dimensions of all proposed improvements, including: maximum footprint and height of buildings and other structures; walkways; fences; walls; trash containers; outdoor lighting; landscaped areas and open space; recreational areas; parking spaces; loading and service areas. This comment may be best addressed by providing additional sheets for various areas of required information. Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. 1 pfi>t- L DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 22701 ViiginiaDOT.org David S. Ekern, P.E. COMMISSIONER May 7, 2008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments May 8, 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the May 8, 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP 2008 - 00059 Olinva and sons - Major (Megan Yaniglos) No comments SDP 2008 - 00060 First Church of the Nazarene — Preliminary (Summer Frederick) VDOT has previously reviewed the configuration and location of the turn land and entrance and it does appear to be in accordance with past meetings and comments from VDOT. The construction of VDOT project 0022 - 002 -104 will begin May 12` 2008. This plan needs to, and appears to be, designed to the changes by the intersection project. Final plans should show the proposed intersection project and how the proposed turn lane and entrance will tie in to that project. VDOT has provided the developer the survey data and that needs to be shown on the final plan. SDP - 2008 - 00061 Easrlysville Business Park - Final (Summer Frederick) The sag vertical curve at station 21 +44 needs to have a minimum k value of 17. Outlet protection at A 1 should be class II rip rap SDP - 2008 - 00064 Georgetown/Hydraulic Professional Offices Preliminary (Lisa Glass) Previous comments have been made for ZMA -2006- 00014 that still need to he addressed and are: OYEASS0OOE TRANSPORTATION EXCELLENCE 6 2 0 0 This plan must be coordinated with the VDOT project for Georgetown Road. The project manager has been forwarded a copy of this plan. The applicants engineer should contact VDOT for coordination. It is very undesirable to have the entrance in the functional area of the intersection, however, a previous meeting with the engineer and the county determined that this is the best solution at this site for Hydraulic Road. The only other option is to access the site from Georgetown Road. The plan needs to show the intersection of 656 and 743 and show details of turn movements, lane widths, storage lengths, etc. All projected and existing traffic needs to be shown on the plan. Sight lines need to be shown for the entrance to the site and also for the existing intersection at 656/743. Vehicles heading northbound on Hydraulic trying to turn left into the site is a dangerous situation and needs to he addressed with the site plan. Proposed traffic needs to be shown on the site plan to determine is a Chapter 527 study needs to be done. SDP- 2008 -00065 Moser Radiation Therapy Ctr -Major (Gerald Gatobu) LTACH access management plan should be completed prior to any site plan approvals. SDP - 2008 -00066 Hunters Way Site Plan Amendment -Major (Lisa K Glass) The plan needs to include calculations for outlet velocity on YD I and outlet protection details. Also include ditch calculations. SUB -2008- 00102 Handley Farm Estates(10 -19) lots -Final (Megan Yaniglos) No comments. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District May 14, 2008 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975-0224 TO:Summer Frederick Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: 1 Church of the Nazarene A i ,-*/I A V .....,ItQt l cm 4 E; , q _ M o 5 v 11 U a N1119m J /1 N li 0 co , N n 4 ---- 14: P ,51D 1 e F O .itCJ AIv cn w q N O N rn ni 1 4,-' 0' v fl N I 10 I io w Q s- AtA N W p0 cry x :.w w IIIMIPi5IIUritv o N= CO Q t rn. R I n fl .,,,0 C° f:1"-I '''''''' '713) iii° \a al 1<r'—N ,I n NI S 0 Q,W Y,W ..S 1 v O 1 i cli I l (co r lhl y ,J I Y V f VtiX 1S t ,I y) t• ,,..j tt, I I i ,, T 0 8 , flPf,1 J Y N lv Cl s A co n ;2773 /, )ft„, aI7vkf ,\,,,' - r t Q 0,SAC'Nm:r 1 , sc fix,, ^,„ USDA United States Dural Prepared by: Tho Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: 1 Church of Nazarene Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 51B Manteo channery silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Manteo is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, shallow, somewhat excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is channery silt loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a very low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 51D Manteo channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Manteo is a moderately steep to steep, shallow, somewhat excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is channery silt loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a very low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 5/15/08 and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 51B Manteo channery silt Very limited loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 51D Manteo channery silt Very limited loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Somewhat limited 15 percent slopes 51B Manteo channery silt Very limited loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 51D Manteo channery silt Very limited loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes 7I D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 5/15/08 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes 51B Manteo channery silt Not hydric loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 51D Manteo channery silt Not hydric loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes 51B Manteo channery silt 1.5 loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 51 D Manteo channery silt 1.5 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 5/15/08