Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800063 Review Comments 2008-05-06Y ti~ OF A1.g j 0 6c"1 yr RGIN COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 DATE: May 6, 2008 Stephen Waller 536 Pantops Center PMB 320 Charlottesville, VA, 22911. RE: SDP - 2008 -00063 Tracy — Temple Property/ Verizon Tier II PSWF- Final. Dear Sir, The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Principle Planner ARB) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Principle Planner Rural Area) Albemarle County Division of Inspections (Building Official) Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA). Albemarle County Fire and Rescue. Albemarle County Geographic and Data Services (GDS) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Conunittee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11” x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday May 19 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Gerald Gatobu, Senior PlannerCountyofAlbemarle Department of Community DevelopmentCurrentDevelopment 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 -45Phone: (434)296 -5832 Ext 3385Fax: (434)972 -4126 Application #: SDP200800063 ,— ort Review ®m,,,ents Project Name:,Tracy- Temple LPNerizon Wireless - Final Personal Wireless Facility Date Completed: 05/02/2008 Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911 Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:05/05/2008 Reviewer:Gerald Gatobu CDZCD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:Balloon test conducted on 04/29/2008. Pictures were taken. Tower goes before the Planning Commission on Tuesday June 10th 2008. Site review date set for May 8th 2008. Date Completed:04/30/2008 Reviewer:Joan McDowell Planning Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments:The proposed property is located adjacent to an Agricultural /Forestal District. The access road and tower should consider the impacts on the agricultural use. The access road goes through an Ag /For District property. Page C -1 indicates that the Land use of the surrounding properties is residential. With exception of the smaller parcels (TMP 40 -12, TMP 40 -8A, TMP 40 -9C) the land use on these properties is agricultural or forestal. Date Completed:05/05/2008 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:No Objection. Date Completed:04/25/2008 Reviewer:Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1 / /i(llti \ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Gerald Gatobu, Current Development Project Planner From: Phil Custer, Current Development engineering review Date: 25 April 2008 Subject: Tracy- Temple LP Verizon Tower (SDP- 2008 - 00063) The site plan for the Verizon Tower on TMP 40 -8 has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development has no objection to the plan.