Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800073 Review Comments 2008-05-14Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District May 14, 2008 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975-0224 TO: Summer Frederick Planning Department RE: Soils Report and Comments fol Three Notch'd Center i kA co co CF UJ Q7. W O to hz S J u w i i U7 _ \. w 3 \ \r j ' p. < j .•' -__ `, ;'i re rn w i lwk _ r *,h x• n Wv h w a w (iS a `t.; Ej m r. r W ~ r OD f w a • -;;, t ? o i - ao _ a ._ a-1 R, w uj ul m . o m u'F " m f7 ! f.'t ILI ol w , w 11Y :• m f,1 - ' ._ — _ £ to is C) toTM'" n F rn 7,r F ` ?— l n) w { m r c) t W (f '' m a„ Fi UD USDA United States Natural Department of Resources Agriculture Conservation Service Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil &Water Conservation District 434 - 975 -0224 Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Three Notch'd Center Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 4D Ashe loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Ashe is a moderately steep to steep, moderately deep, somewhat excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 7B Braddock loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Braddock is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is O. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 37B3 Hayesville clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 81B Thurmont loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Thurmont is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 5/14/08 permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The top of the seasonal high water table is at 60 inches. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is L. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 91 Urban land Description Category: Virginia FOTG No description available for Urban Land. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 4D Ashe loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 7B Braddock loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 37B3 Hayesville clay loam, 2 to Somewhat limited 7 percent slopes, severely eroded 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 81B Thurmont loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 91 Urban land Not Rated Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 4D Ashe loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 7B Braddock loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 37B3 Hayesville clay loam, 2 to Not hydric 7 percent slopes, severely eroded 370 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 81B Thurmont loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 91 Urban land Not hydric Chomas Jetterson SWCD 2 5/14/08 Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth: 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 4D Ashe loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 7B Braddock loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 37B3 Hayesville clay loam, 2 to 1.5 7 percent slopes, severely eroded 370 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 81B Thurmont loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 91 Urban land 0 Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 4D Ashe loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes 7B Braddock loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 37B3 Hayesville clay loam, 2 to Moderate 7 percent slopes, severely eroded 370 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 81B Thurmont loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 5/14/08 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 4D Ashe loam, 15 to 25 Low percent slopes 7B Braddock loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 37B3 Hayesville clay loam, 2 to Moderate 7 percent slopes, severely eroded 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 81 B Thurmont loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes Chomas Jetterson SWCD 5/14/08 y O> Af,n t o`4- + r COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP - 2008 - 00073, Three Notch'd Center, Preliminary Site Plan Plan preparer: Mr. Nathaniel Perkins, NP Engineering nat.perkins @gmail.com Owner or rep.: Notch'd LLC Date received: 28 April 2008 (plan date 28 April 2008) Date of Comment: 19 May 2008 Engineer: Amy Pflaum, Current Development Engineer apflaum(a)albemarle.org The preliminary site plan for the Three Notch'd Center received on April 28, 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development recommends denial of the preliminary site plan until the following conditions are addressed: 1. Please include a date of survey with the SOURCE OF TOPO information on Sheet L [14- 302Al2] 2. Please note that easements for grading, access to and use of the pond must be granted from the owner of TMP 56A3 -7 prior to approval of the final site plan. Also, easements for grading and constructing the shared access must be granted from the owner of TMP 56 -67. Please show and label these easements on the plan. [ 14- 302A5] 3. Please add drainage area boundaries to the conceptual stormwater management layout to show that as much area as possible is being captured in the proposed stormwater system. How much area is draining to the existing drainage ditch and 15" culvert on the south side of Route 240? Existing topo needs to show the drainage ditch. [ 17 -312C, 17- 31.5A] 4. No water quality measures, other than the existing pond, are being proposed. Please conceptually show how the required removal rate will be met for each drainage area. [ 18- 32.5.6.k] 5. Please show the existing stream and the limits of the stream buffer just north of the property. [ 18- 32.5.6. t] 6. Please show the existing tree line. [ 18 - 32.5.6.e] 7. Please show the spillway of the existing pond [ 18 32.5.6.t]. 8. It is difficult to determine on the plan if the "Turn lane along entire property line" is existing or proposed. Please use shading to delineate between existing and proposed features. Please show current lane striping on Route 240 to the plan. [ 18- 32.5.6.x] 9. In several areas of the Site Grading & Utility Plan, text is overlapped by dark lines or other text. Please revise for better readability. 10. A "Dumpster Area" is called out on the Existing Conditions Plan outside of the existing parking lot. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Sheet 2 of 2 11. On the Site Layout Plan, please show an 18'x 10' dumpster pad per Section 18- 4.12.19.b of the County Code. 12. Please show the existing sanitary sewer line on the Storm Profiles where it crosses the proposed storm sewer between manholes 2A and 2 to verify no vertical conflict. 13. A Ditch Detail is shown on the Details Sheet, however, no ditches are shown on the Site Grading & Utility Plan. 14. The Typical Pavement Section Detail shown on the Details Sheet does not appear to be adequate for the estimated average daily trips of 2854 calculated by Draper Aden Associates in June of 2007. Please submit pavement design calculations. File: El SRC ADP Three Notch'd Center COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP -2008- 00073, Three Notch'd Center, Preliminary Site Plan Plan preparer: Mr. Nathaniel Perkins, NP Engineering nat.perkins @gmail.com Owner or rep.: Notch'd LLC Date received: 28 April 2008 (plan date 28 April 2008) Date of Comment: 19 May 2008 Engineer: Amy Pflaum, Current Development Engineer apflaum @albemarle.org The preliminary site plan for the Three Notch'd Center received on April 28, 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development recommends denial of the preliminary site plan until the following conditions are addressed: 1. Please include a date of survey with the SOURCE OF TOPO information on Sheet 1. [ 14 -302A 12] 2. Please note that easements For grading, access to and use of the pond must be granted from the owner of TMP 56A3 -7 prior to approval of the final site plan. Also, easements for grading and constructing the shared access must be aranted from the owner of TMP 56 -67. Please show and label these easements on the plan. [ 14- 302A5] 3. Please add drainage area boundaries to the conceptual stormwater management layout to show that as much area as possible is being captured in the proposed stormwater system. How much area is draining to the existing drainage ditch and 15" culvert on the south side of' Route 240'? Existing topo needs to show the drainage ditch. [ 17 -312C, 17 -315A] 4. No water quality measures, other than the existing pond, are being proposed. Please conceptually show how the required removal rate will be met for each drainage area. [ 18- 32.5.6.k] 5. Please show the existing stream and the limits of the stream buffer just north of the property. [ 18- 32.5.6.11 6. Please show the existing tree line. [ 18- 32.5.6.e] 7. Please show the spillway of the existing pond [ 18- 32.5.6.f]. 8. It is difficult to determine on the plan if the "Turn lane along entire property line" is existing or proposed. Please use shading to delineate between existing and proposed features. Please show current lane striping on Route 240 to the plan. [ 18- 32.5.6.s] 9. In several areas of the Site Grading & Utility Plan, text is overlapped by dark lines or other text. Please revise for better readability. 10. A "Dumpster Area" is called out on the Existing Conditions Plan outside of the existing parking lot. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Sheet 2 of 2 11. On the Site Layout Plan, please show an 18'x10' dumpster pad per Section 18- 4.12.19.b of the County Code. 12. Please show the existing sanitary sewer line on the Storm Profiles where it crosses the proposed storm sewer between manholes 2A and 2 to verify no vertical conflict. 13. A Ditch Detail is shown on the Details Sheet, however, no ditches are shown on the Site Grading & Utility Plan. 14. The Typical Pavement Section Detail shown on the Details Sheet does not appear to be adequate for the estimated average daily trips of 2854 calculated by Draper Aden Associates in June of 2007. Please submit pavement design calculations. File: E SRC ADP T'hrec Notch'rl Center Phone (434) 296 -5832 Nat Perkins, NP Engineering 1850 Brown's Gap Turnpike Charlottesville, VA, 22901 RGx > COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 May 23, 2008 RE: SDP - 2008 -00073 Preliminary Site Plan for Three Notch'd Center Dear Sir, e1 1; ' .L. 011 t4,6j 5 Z Fax (434) 972 -4126 The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Principle Planner ARB) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Principle Planner Crozet Area) Albemarle County Division of Inspections (Building Official) Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) under separate cover Albemarle County Fire and Rescue. Albemarle County Geographic and Data Services (GDS) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday June 2, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Lisa Glass, Planner, for Summer Frederick, Sr. Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development, Current Development Division 434 - 296- 5832,ext. 3432 CC: File County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Nat Perkins, NP Engineering (nat.perkins (y)gmail.com Jo Higgins, Project Development Ltd. (musxit(aaol.com) From: Lisa Glass, Principal Planner, for Summer Frederick, Sr. Planner Division: Zoning and Current Development e6l Date: May 22, 2008 Subject: SDP 08 -73: Preliminary Site Plan for Three Notch'd Center The Albemarle County Department of Community Development, Current Development Division planner has reviewed the site plan referenced above. The plan may be approved when the following items have been addressed. Each comment is followed by a reference to the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. The site plan comments below are from the Current Development Planner only. Connnents from other reviewers will be forthcoming under separate cover. L Tie site plan must match the approved ARB Plan. 2. Describe all variances: The topo indicates a critical slope waiver is required. The joint entrance drive along the property line with adjacent rural areas indicates a buffer zone variance is required. We are researching the formal action approving these waivers. Section 32.5.6 a and ZMA 2007 -006) 3. Please include all proffers on the site plan. (Section 32.5.6 a, see ZMA 07 -006) 4. Provide one datum reference, or explain which sheet it is on. (Section 32.5.6 a) 5. Add current use for adjacent parcels. (Section 32.5.6 a) 6. Add minimum building separation requirements. (Section 32.5.6 a) 7. Add maximum acreage for each use with the proposed uses. (Section 32.5.6 b) 8. Add maximum amount of impervious cover for the site (add pavement and building). Section 32.5.6 ) 9. Add the total amount of paved and vehicular circulation area to the landscape plan. Section 32.5.6 b.) 10. Add maximum height for each building, or explain where this information is on the plan. Section 32.5.6 b) 11. Correct which building is two story and which is three story, note on page 1 does not match labels on plan sheet. (Section 32.5.6 b) 12. Confirm the south east corner of the building has a step back and is not in the front setback. 13. Add spot elevations to clarify proposed grading, add GIS topo for 50 feet beyond limits of grading (for area of joint drive and grading tie into adjacent parcel), or get review engineer approval not to show the topo. (Section 32.5.6 d) 14. Proposed grading: offsite grading onto the adjacent parcels will require a grading easement from neighbors (TMP 56A3 -7 for north west corner and TMP 56 -67 for joint entrance area.) 15. Shared driveway with adjacent parcel and sight easement must be granted by the adjacent property owner (ZMA 2007 -006) 16. Add a note on existing conditions, sheet 3, regarding which structures, paved areas, utilities, etc. are to be removed. ( Section 32.5.6 e) 17. Add a note not in Floodplain. (Section 32.5.6 h) 18. Please add sizes and easement dimensions for water and sewer lines, along the road frontage. (Section 32.5.6j) 19. Add easements for other utilities; for example does the existing overhead telephone line get relocated across the site? If so the cable needs to be located so not to interfere with proposed landscaping. (Section 32.5.6 1) 20. Note signs not part of this project but will get ARB approval. (Section 32.5.6 n) 21. Show dumpster pad and enclosure, dimensions and material. (Section 32.5.6 n) 22. Review circulation for the loading spaces with Engineer to confirm large truck delivery has adequate turning radius. 23. Show sidewalk dimension adjacent to parking area. (Section 32.5.6 n) 24. Show outdoor lighting or indicate there is none. (Section 32.5.6 n). 25. Show areas intended to be dedicated for public use, for example the drainage easement for the street run -off from the 15" culvert under route 240 that runs across the site. Section 32.5.6 o) 26. Landscape plan is required, and must match the ARB approved plan. Add note requested by the PC that final landscaping shall meet ARB approval. (Section 32.5.6 p) 27. Include landscape note from ZMA "landscaping will be provided along the east side of the shared driveway with a landscape easement provided by the adjacent owner" - match wording to the application plan. (ZMA 2007 -006) 28. Indicate traffic generation has been or will be addressed with Engineering. (Section 32.5.6 q) Please confirm that the conditions of the ZMA 07 -06 have been addressed or will be addressed prior to final site plan approval. Please contact Lisa Glass at 296 -5832, ext. 3432, or Summer Frederick , ext. 3565, if you have any questions. Application #: SDP200800073 Short Review Lro ants Prot ect Name:' Three Notch ' d Center - Prel i Preliminary — Non- residential Date Completed: 05/19/2008 Reviewer: Amy Pflaum Engineer Z &CD Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: SRC 5/22/08 Date Completed:05/15/2008 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:05/21/2008 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated April 28, 2008. i Rearrange one of the 4 barrier -free parking spaces, on the north side of the buildings, so that it is van- accessible. The running CG -12 in front of the four barrier -free parking spaces is not allowed. Rearrange this element so that it is not necessary for a wheel chair to traverse a sideways - sloping surface in order toreachthelevelsidewalk. Note: Both buildings require fire suppression sprinkler systems. Date Completed:05/05/2008 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:This site falls within the Route 240 Entrance Corridor. Consequently, ARB review and approval are required prior to final site plan approval. ARB applications, checklists, schedules and guidelines are available on line at www.albemarle.org. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, May 22, 2008 0) , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP -2008- 00073, Three Notch'd Center, Preliminary Site Plan Plan preparer: Mr. Nathaniel Perkins, NP Engineering nat.perkinsCgmail.com Owner or rep.: Notch'd LLC Date received: 28 April 2008 (plan date 28 April 2008) Date of Comment: 19 May 2008 Engineer: Amy Pflaum, Current Development Engineer apflauIII @albemarle.org The preliminary site plan for the Three Notch'd Center received on April 28, 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development recommends denial of the preliminary site plan until the following conditions are addressed: 1. Please include a date of survey with the SOURCE OF TOPO information on Sheet 1. [ 14 -302A 12] 2. Please note that easements for grading, access to and use of the pond must be granted from the owner of TMP 56A3 -7 prior to approval of the final site plan. Also, easements for grading and constructing the shared access must be granted fi the owner of TMP 56 -67. Please show and label these easements on the plan. [ 14- 302A51 3. Please add drainage area boundaries to the conceptual stormwater management layout to show that as much area as possible is being captured in the proposed stormwater system. How much area is draining to the existing drainage ditch and 15" culvert on the south side of Route 240? Existing topo needs to show the drainage ditch. [ 17 -312C, 17 -315A] 4. No water quality measures, other than the existing pond, are being proposed. Please conceptually show how the required removal rate will be met for each drainage area. [ 18- 32.5.6.k] 5. Please show the existing stream and the limits of the stream buffer just north of the property. [ 18- 32.5.6.t] 6. Please show the existing tree line. [ 18- 32.5.6.e] 7. Please show the spillway of the existing pond [ 18- 32.5.6.t]. 8. It is difficult to determine on the plan if the "Turn lane along entire property line" is existing or proposed. Please use shading to delineate between existing and proposed features. Please show current lane striping on Route 240 to the plan. [ 18- 32.5.6.x] 9. In several areas of the Site Grading & Utility Plan, text is overlapped by dark lines or other text. Please revise for better readability. 10. A "Dumpster Area" is called out on the Existing Conditions Plan outside of the existing parking lot. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review Comments Sheet 2 of 2 11. On the Site Layout Plan, please show an 18'x 10' dumpster pad per Section 18- 4.12.19.b of the County Code. 12. Please show the existing sanitary sewer line on the Storm Profiles where it crosses the proposed storm sewer between manholes 2A and 2 to verify no vertical conflict. 13. A Ditch Detail is shown on the Details Sheet, however, no ditches are shown on the Site Grading & Utility Plan. 14. The Typical Pavement Section Detail shown on the Details Sheet does not appear to be adequate for the estimated average daily trips of 2854 calculated by Draper Aden Associates in June of 2007. Please submit pavement design calculations. File: EI SRC ADP Three Notch'd Center a P X ly, s' \[. f () V1 f ill,` DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virginia 222701 David S. Ekern, P.E. VirginiaDOT.org COMMISSIONER May 21, 2008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 MchTtire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments May 22, 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the May 22, 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2008 -00070 Vintage Virginia Apples Cidery- Waiver (Lisa Glass) The plan needs to show the connection to route 29. The entrance needs to meet The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways criteria and show adequate sight distance. SDP -2008 -00072 Old Trail Village — Phase I- blocks 15 and 31 -Final (Megan Yaniglos) Standard CG -1 I's with 25 foot radii need to be the method of connecting the alley to the proposed state road as was approved with the preliminary plan. Label the grade on Claremont Lane. Claremont Lane should have a 50 foot landing area at the connection to Glen Valley Dr. as described in appendix B of the Road Design Manual. The intersection of Fielding Run Dr. with Meadow Bluff should have the 50 foot landing. Include the "No Parking" signs on the layout sheet as needed according to the typical section. Sump inlets spread at the curb for structures 1, 9, 17, 25, 31, 45, 47, and 49 exceed the maximum allowed. SDP - 2008 -00073 Three Notch'd Center - Preliminary (Summer Frederick) The entrances to route 240 need to be designed to the CG -1 1 standards and the profiles at the entrances need to be shown on the plan. f veaas + T4RANSPORTAittiN E3tCElEEHCE Pavement widening in accordance with st'd WP -2 needs to be shown for the additional of the turn lane. Standard curb and gutter CG -6 is required along route 240. Drainage computations for structure 7 need to be shown along with pipe computations. Show sight distances at the entrances. The proposed ROW needs to be a minimum of three feet behind the back of curb or to include the clear zone, whichever is greater. Any feature outside proposed ROW that needs to be maintained by VDOT such as drainage features need to be within an easement. Any utility poles within the clear zone will need to be relocated. SDP - 2008 -00074 Blue Ridge Co- housing — Final (Gerald Gatobu) Any work within the VDOT ROW will need to be permitted by VDOT Charlottesville Residency. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or continents, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 - 293 -0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti Application #: -ZMA200700006 —' Short Revi @W Comments Project Name: Three Notch'd Center Date Completed:07/20/2007 Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments:Please have the applicant look at the left turn requirements on Rt. 240. 1 did not find this in their traffic' information. Date Completed:08/30/2007 Reviewer:Glenn Brooks Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments:Please also reference the critical slopes waiver. Date Completed:06/04/2007 Reviewer:Joel DeNunzio VDOT Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments:ZMA- 2007 -00006 Three Notch' d Center ? R.O.W. needs to be dedicated to accommodate the proposed turn lane and any additional roadway features such as curb and gutter. The R.O.W. line needs to be set back a minimum of 3 feet beyond the outermost roadway feature that will be state maintained, i.e. the back of the curb. The clear zone should also be checked to ensure that the iR.O.W. includes any clear zone requirements. ? Sight lines and projected traffic volumes need to be shown on the plan. ? An analysis for a left run lane warrant needs to be completed and submitted to VDOT. ? The proposed turn lane needs to be designed in accordance with VDOT' s Road Design Manual, Drainage Manual, and the Minimum Standards for Entrances to State Highways. ? Detailed plans for road improvements and drainage improvements will need to be submitted with the preliminary site plan. ? A permit will be required for all work within state R.O.W. Date Completed:05/30/2007 Reviewer:Julie Mahon Historic Preservation Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:See attached comments Date Completed:06/04/2007 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Date Completed: 06/04/2007 Reviewer: John Shepherd Planner Z &CD Review Status: Pending Reviews Comments: The request requires a waiver for the disturbance of critical slopes, a waiver to locate parking less than 20 feet from the RA district and a waiver to disturb the 20 -foot buffer adjacent to the RA district. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed on: Friday, May 23, 2008 Date Completed:09/03/20 Reviewer:John Shepherd Admin Zoning Review Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments:The request requires a waiver for the disturbance of critical slopes and a waiver to disturb the 20 -foot buffer adjacent to the RA district. Requests for these waivers have been submitted with the plan revised on August 15, 2007. These items should be addressed as part of the review of the rezoning. Date Completed:05/29/2007 Reviewer:Tamara Ambler Planning Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: No water resources - no comment Page: 2.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Friday, May 23, 2008 A j16lX y J 4. a • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1001 Orar.cle Road C,alp , pr)r, Virginia 22701 David S. Ekern, P.E. Vtrgir.iaDQT org CC ?JIMISS10NER May 21, 2008 W \ Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development I 101 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments May 22, 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the May 22, 2008 Site Review Committee meeting: SDP -2008 -00070 Vintage Virginia Apples Cidery- Waiver (Lisa Glass) The plan needs to show the connection to route 29. The entrance needs to ueet The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways criteria and show adequate sight distance. SDP -2008 -00072 Old Trail Village — Phase I- blocks 15 and 31 -Final (Nlegan Y Standard CG -I 1's with 25 foot radii need to be the method of connecting the alley to the proposed state road as was approved with the preliminary plan. Label the grade on Claremont Lane. Claremont Lane should have a 50 foot landing area at the connection to Glen Valley Dr. as described in appendix B of the Road Design Manual. The intersection of Fielding Run Dr. with Meadow Bluff should have the 50 foot landing. Include the "No Parking" signs on the layout sheet as needed according to the typical section. Sump inlets spread at the curb for structures 1, 9, 17, 25, 31, 45, 47. and 49 exceed the maximum allowed. SDP -2008 -00073 Three Notch'd Center - Preliminary (Summer Frederick) The entrances to route 240 need to be designed to the CG -I l standards and the profiles at the entrances need to be shown on the plan. veags ac TRANSPORTAPON EX(EItE 4 4 :) 6 ? 'J i1 r, kmo I aveme wide to accordance with st'd WP -2 needs to be shown for the additional of the turn lan Standard curb nd gutter CG -6 is required along route 240. Draina e c o for structure 7 need to be shown along with pipe computations. Show , ht dist The propos , needs to be a minimum f three feet behind the back of curb or to include the clear zone, whichever is greater. Any feature outside proposed ROW that needs to be maintained by VDOT such as drainage features need to be within an easement. Any utility poles within the clear zone will need to be relocated. SDP - 2008 - 00074 Blue Ridee Co- housing — Final (Gerald Gatobu) Any work within the VDOT ROW will need to be permitted by VDOT Charlottesville Residency. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti v` 1 a, a C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 501 Orange Roid ipr "per. Vu., rr,: 2 2TC1 Ju.,nv<iDOT.org David S. Ekern, P.E. CC v1t.A1 ,_)iCiJER May 21, 2008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments May 22, 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the May 22, 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP -2008 -00070 Vintage Virginia Apples Cidery- Waiver (Lisa Glass) The plan needs to show the connection to route 29. The entrance needs to meet The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways criteria and show adequate sight distance. SDP -2008 -00072 Old Trail Village — Phase I- blocks 15 and 31 -Final (Megan Yaniplos Standard CG- l I's with 25 foot radii need to be the mcthod of connecting the alley to the proposed state road as was approved with the preliminary plan. Label the grade on Claremont Lane. Claremont Lane should have a 50 foot landing area at the connection to Glen Valley Dr. as described in appendix B of the Road Design Manual. The intersection of FicldinL Run Dr. with Meadow Bluff should have the 50 foot landing. Include the "No Parking" signs on the layout sheet as needed according to the typical section. Sump inlets spread at the curb for structures 1, 9, 17, 25, 31, 45, 47, and 49 exceed the maximum allowed. SDP- 2008 -00073 Three Notch'd Center- Preliminary (Summer Frederick) The entrances to route 240 need to be designed to the CG -1 ( standards and the profiles at the entrances need to be shown on the plan. YEARS Oi ' tR,ANSPORTAT €0 €XCELL NC£ Pavement widening in accordance with st'd WP -2 needs to be shown for the additional of the turn lane. Standard curb and gutter CG -6 is required along route 240. Drainage computations for structure 7 need to be shown along with pipe computations. Show sight distances at the entrances. The proposed ROW needs to be a minimum of three feet behind the back of curb or to include the clear zone, whichever is greater. Any feature outside proposed ROW that needs to be maintained by VDOT such as drainage features need to be within an easement. Any utility poles within the clear zone will need to be relocated. SDP- 2008 -00074 Blue Ridge Co- housing — Final (Gerald Gatobu) Any work within the VDOT ROW will need to be permitted by VDOT Charlottesville Residency. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434- 293 -0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner From: Amy P11aum, Engineer Division: Current Development Date: June 18, 2008 Subject: SDP200800073 Three Notch'd Center Preliminary Site Plan The Preliminary Site Plan for the Three Notch'd Center received on April 28, 2008, and revised and resubmitted on June 9, 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for Current Development recommends approval of the Preliminary Site Plan. Approval of a Final Site Plan for this property will be contingent on the following: 1. Easements for grading and constructing the shared access must be granted from the owner of TMP 56 -67. 2. Easements and agreements for grading, access to and use of the stormwater detention pond must be granted from the owner of TMP 56A3 -7. 3. Verification that this pond has been designed to contain and treat run -off from this site, and is built per the standards of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Handbooks. 4. An approved Water Protection Ordinance application. File: E2_psp_ADP_Three Notch'd Center