HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800082 Review Comments 2008-06-10Bodman, Bradley
From:Bill Fritz [BFRITZ @albemarle.org]
Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:50 PM
To:Margaret Maliszewski; Jolynda Cooper; Bodman, Bradley
Cc:Brent Nelson
Subject:RE: Sam's Club - ARB
I have reviewed the comments of the Design Planner and agree with them. The proposed landscaping is located within
existing easements. The plan cannot be approved without evidence from the easement holder that the landscaping may
be placed within the easement. This site is visible from the Entrance Corridor Overlay district. Approval from the Design
Planner, Margaret Maliszewski, is also required prior to final approval.
William D. Fritz, AICP
Chief of Current Development
434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3242
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:03 PM
To: 'Jolynda Cooper'; 'bbodman @dewberry.com'
Cc: Bill Fritz; Brent Nelson
Subject: FW: Sam's Club - ARB
Jolynda and Brad,
Regarding the site plan amendment, the Current Development review for the amendment (SDP- 2008 -82) has not been
completed yet. As I mentioned earlier (see message below), the plan does not include all of the existing landscaping in
the area of work, and some of the proposed planting appears to conflict with some of the utilities. I can't approve plants in
the easements and it is unlikely that the Current Development reviewer will approve the amendment without resolution of
these conflicts. Either the plants need to be shifted out of the easements, or documentation that the easement holders
approve of the landscaping must be provided. Also, please understand that all landscaping shown on the last approved
landscape plan, if not specifically shown on your proposed plan as to be removed, must remain in place. It would be best
to show those existing plants on the plan for clarity and to avoid confusion later. Please note that my comments do not
constitute the Current Development review for the site plan amendment. The Current Development reviewer indicated that
he will forward his comments to you in the very near future.
Regarding the repainting, the left side elevation indicates that P38, the darker color, is proposed for the cornice elements
of the piers and that P41, the lighter color, is proposed for the upper 2 bands of the piers below the cornice. One of these
bands is about 10' tall. The one below it is about 2' tall. Currently, the 2' band that runs between the piers is dark in color.
Do you really want to paint the band a light color on the piers, thereby establishing a discontinuous band, or is the color
mislabeled on the drawing? (It also looks like the color numbers might be reversed at the right side of the entrance, where
P41 is labeled at the cornice and P38 is on the upper part of the wall. This one doesn't matter in my review since it won't
be visible from the EC -- it is just FYI.)
Regarding the signage, I will share your submittal with Brent and he will follow up with comments (ARB- 08 -02)
Margaret
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:38 PM
To: 'Jolynda Cooper'
Subject: Sam's Club - ARB
Iolvnda,
We have determined that the produce cooler addition does not need to he taken to the AR13 for re%icw hCClIUSe it falls just outside the
ARB*s area of authority. I am sorry for the confusion on this issLir: it seems there has been a change in interpretation over (lie years.
I believe the changes you've made to the proposal have made this a much a better project, and I hope you continue to include the brick
screening wall, the improved planting, and the improved chain link screening in the proposal.
The minor site plan amendment is still required for the proposal. I will still need to approve the revisions to some ol' the planting (and
to the existing chain link), and I can do that as part of the minor amendment review. The plan suhmitted for ARB review did not
include all ol' the existing landscaping, and some of the proposed planting appears to conflict with sonic of the utilities. These conflicts
will need to he resolved and the minor amendment should claril'y that all of the existing landscaping is to remain unless otherwise
noted on the plan. I can help coordinate this with our Current Development reviewer. ( I spoke with Brad Bodman with Dewhcrry this
morning and updated him on the Status ol' ARB application.)
Regarding the painting, hecause the painting is proposed for a portion of the building that falls within the ARB's jurisdiction, I will
also need to review that part of the proposal. When we spoke on the phone yesterday, you indicated that the painting was part of the
previous sign proposal that we also have under review. I checked that file and the only painting that was proposed with the sign
application was the painting of the blue stripe. The architectural elevations included with the cooler submittal include the re- painting
of other I:IFS sections of the building. We can handle the review of the EIFS painting with the sign application, but we will need color
samples for the proposed paint (other than the "honor blue "). Are the proposed colors intended to match the existin colors'.
I've copied below some email correspondence between Brent Nelson and Jo Chichester for reference on the sign proposal. Regarding
the Status of that submittal, the ARB indicated in Fchruary that thcv could not support the painting of the existing blue brick, and we
are wailing for revised drawings to close out that application. I recommend that we attempt to resolve all the painting issucS with thatresubmiltal.
Why don't you give me a call once _you've read this so we can make Sure we're Set to He up all the loose ends!
Thanks.
Margaret
Margaret Malisvewski, Principal Planner
Albemarle County C'onununity Development
401 McIntire Road, 2nd Floor
Charlottcs\illc, VA 22902
434 - 296 -5832 x3276: fax: 434 -972-4012
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Wednesday. March 05, 2008 d:d 1 PM
To: 'Jo Chichester'
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -20 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sari's Gen Renxulcl, Signagc: Outstanding Review Items
111 t.. II p;, i ?' r:!! ., Iitl it ,i .• !!i'1! ,; .!
Brent
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Alhemarle County
Department of Community Development
434 - 296 - 5832, cxt 3272
434-972 -401 ? ( fax )
ARB Wch Pa-c:
liEip_ . %1 tCll l,ll Ei" IY It,'t !,ll lih;It . t.,J, "i, 1 illi,'W h NI, p,I"t
From: Jo Chichester ImaiIto :Jo.Chic lie ster(grph2ae.corn
Sent: Wedncsrlay. March 05, 2008 4:35 I'M
To: Brent Nelson
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -20-08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signagc: Outstanding Review Items
Hcllo, Brent:
just thought I'd let you kuo% that I have not ignored this issue. I halve been trNing to gel IN vl to respond since Nou sent this
enuul.
kre NN( OK iNith writing for that" Let me kn(m.
kppreciate it ... P)n knoNN that.
Best regards.
Jo. Chichester-
Permit Co(w(inator
71() Wcst Rii
Rogers. AR 72750
Phonc: (479) 036-3545 cx(. 35
I I": (8881 050 -3545 c\t. 3598
I ax: (47 621 -5202
Wch:
From: Brent Nelson Inrtilto :hnelsonCn'alhenrrrlc.or'gI
Sent: Wednesday, February 20. 2008 2:22 PM
To: Jo Chichester
Cc: Mike Phillips: Jack Nickell; Andy Harrison: Margaret Malisi.ewski: Mark Goddard: Jolynda Cooper
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -20-08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel. Signage: Outstandint Review Items
L!•l,I, , \k1, w, c!iif• . i .I i.r ": !!IL k—ll,! ! „! ,In.' I "'t;'. „nt,'rinll 111,' :11 11 I11 1'6 " ,"!,, k, 11 , I u! {
Ili ,117''1`\ L1 ,I t +' Il -•. -1 r'.. i" lit, ,lil i ph, 1;1 c.li }, \il'i lI! IIlf „i , 'nl i :111!'.:' ,I;1, I-1 !1!, ..:11+•1'. !.)'fill'.' 1 I t
Iii. ,,l 1'_iil.f! '(I {f! AR!” ;j „\,d i !h, -j!!'.I'\ - .1!'.I'...if! !I Ow . ill 1, „ I', .. I' . d I t .i' ; i 1 ilk !`-t-I
1 t:llJ!l,I,lil1!lil'.!- ;;lli'._ !J, I - , , Iilt 1)''',11 I!IC -II .'il'., liti li 'I III"% t ,filid
ul'la`!i !h; ld sfl'. ,.!11:`1 \t 1111 ;t r,, !j, ,, , '!, !t. t, :!” !, !i: ., !!!_ I ,iull 11.11! (hr jwc n:.t: {, 1'11,•.1)'
it .Idvd I Iii 1;;1x,1 i „ f' . I, !' !! :.,. ....'h _'!, ,, 1 !i IID_ ,,;'i„i}\ .lj :t• iLI! :- I Ih 1)' _01
1!iL” `Idt '.'! iil,• i.l i1'. 'll\ L1A 111" i I ( .f'- I' 1!I_ ;tom !I !• IIf'il 'II (; (11!1 11 C:1 :I! .',fl 111'1 CH1,I0 II„!1' \1!! Int!!'.11 i':1 111.1! il: },Il •I ",, ,
dw Wk , 1\,,.111 •' ,rn ills, h.1!!1,l1 III"
Orlill.11lL ,_ % - ,' , -1 llil IrtI ,il\ It. ,. ,i _'!1! 11.11 !!!! -' \.._clan_ ifL i)i PII 1;1;!'.'11, ,,, ., :1(1' 1111 t'.!I <,•i„ ('L • i !f1 .III "!i .(,, lt' li''.I i•i„ \111;1 11
I'i „l,I, •, ,. .11`1)'1 \L li'i' lu „I`+ ,i! I \1,111)'„ i7,•:.',! i, •: \• ", !„ 1 'lit ', \Ilh
P - .I " IIIL' :.1 11, 111\ ,! It-1:1i! ,,l7 'Ir.-',_'1 \_' i r .1 j)I .' :; 1. I,\ it•III'r fl1 .. !!i;' i'1,=I 1, •` \',! IIt'jli !, -;., ,l ll•! ,.i fail', iL" •'1 II'i
1l ,1 \1 117'. 111111 1111' )1 ,' „j '•I I„1• {, -.. Ih, ..iii il, \ {t ,.` I ,l „ ''c ; %r li! .! 1;};11 !illhj;
Brent
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Alhemarle County
Department ol' Community Development
434 -296- -5832, cxt 3272
431 -972 -4012 (fax)
3
ARB Web Pa-e:
III [P:_'/ 1lhCII1, 1IL', 1 I III -t 1,11 111 1) , &Ic it ac,,:- ' -Ir'l
From: to Chichester [nrtilto:.lo.0 hichester(-alpb2ae.comI
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:48 AM
To: Brent Nelson
Cc: Mike Phillips; .lack Nickell, Andy Harrison: Margaret Maliscewski: Mark Goddard; Jolynda Cooper
Subject: 6365 02 -20 -08 Charlottesville VA 07- 0066 Sam's Gen Rcmodel, Silgnage: Outstanding Review Items
Hello, Brent:
Can %ou please gi%e nu an update on the status of our suhmittal° 11e ohviouslN vivre not present at the ARB meeting
esterdak. so t am deductim- that Sou %\vrc succ(s,ful %kith the admirlistrativc reviv\% 1 ?), The protect is scheduled to
he submitted to the city on Feh 2 ;.
Thant. you as ii.oal for your time and cooperation.
Best regards.
lo. Chichester.
PCl Cool
710 West Rl sclawn
Rogers. AR 72750
lu,t hi, I IcItcl ( o )2t 1(,A k0li
Phone: (479) 636 -1545 cvt. 359
IT: : ( Ktix) 656 - ;545 cvt. 35 1K
l (479) 62 5202
Wch:
From: Brent Nelson ImaiIto:hnel son 0 alhemarlc.orgl
Sent: Tuesday, Fchruary 12, 2008 3:46 PM
To: to Chichester
Cc: Mike Phillips: Jack Nickell: Andy Harrison: Margaret Maliscewski
Subject: R1;: 6365 02-11-08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel. Signagc: Outstanding Rcvie'A' Items
I I,,ink 1,
X died I)IM Oc I "wi : -! III,' ''d ;,
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Albemarle County
DeparUnent of Community Developmcnl
434 - 296 -5832, ext 3272
434- 972- 4012(fax)
AR13 Web Page:
Al clltal lc. a ',i 1, t - -.l - 1.ti It!.. ': -t .U1ni,IN , I.tlr '• \trI t +(
From: Jo Chichester Imailto :Jo.Clhichester<n'ph2ac.comj
Sent: Tuesday, Februm 12, 2008 4:03 PM
To: Brent Nelson
Cc: Mike Phillips: Jack Nickell; Andy Harrison
Subject: RF: 6365 02-11 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Rcmodel, Signage: Outstanding Revievti Itenn
Hello, Brent:
Please be aware that we are gathering information from our MEP consultants to answer your questions regarding thefollowing:
1. What is the wattage for the fluorescent light bar over the gas station on the canopy?2. Is the site monument sign illuminated?
Your third question regarding a cross- reference for the "P -6" paint color proposed for the gas station canopy I have ananswerfor: It is Sherwin Williams #SW 6811, "Honorable Blue ". I believe I did furnish you a sample of that color in our
submitted package. If not, you probably have that reference or, I would be more than happy to send you a sample.
I will get you the other two answers just as soon as possible.
Thank you for your patience.
Best regards,
lo. Chiclic,tcr,
Pcrmit Coordinator
710 Wc,t Ro,cl m n
Ro-cr,, AR 7?750
Phone: (-170) 636 -3545 cal. 15
I•: (888) 050 -3545 cxt- 3SIM,
I ax: (479) 021 5202
From: Brent Nelsen
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:02 PM
To: Jo Chichester
Cc: Margaret Malisi.ewski
Subject: Sam's Club, Building Stripe
Hi Jo - As promised, here is the wordings fur the Architectural Review Board's consensus regarding the proposed stripe around (liebuilding.
ARB Action 1N1emo
February 4, 2008
OTHER BUSINESS
Sam's Club: Painting* the brick hand
It was the consensus of the Architectural Review Board that they could not support painting the existing stripe of blue brick on thebuildingfacadewithbluepaint. `
Could you possibly let me know today if they want to take this part of your proposal on to the 2/19/08 mectinO. As I mentioned
yesterday. if you remove the building .stripe from your proposal, we can go ahead and issue an administrative approval un theremainingsignageproposed.
Thanks.
Brant
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Albemarle County
DepartJncnt ufCommunity Ucvclupment
434-290-5832, cxt 3272
434-972-401 (fax)
ARB Web Page:
hU
Z '
Cll Kil 1':."l I I I IC w -('p "'ICIMI I i 11CII I 'tol
Bodman, Bradley
From: Bodman, Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 5:59 PM
To: 'Glenn Brooks'
Cc: 'Bill Fritz'; 'Mike Phillips'; Joe Shoemaker; 'Margaret Maliszewski': Bradner, Brian
Subject: RE: Sam's Club #6365 - Remodel, Charlottesville, VA
Thanks Glenn
Considering your suggestion to keep the trees small within the
County's Drainage easement, I believe that the existing vegetation
within the easement areas would best fit this model.
Our original intent was to provide a tall vegetative screen across
the entire rear of the building, which included replacing the existing,
lower bushes with taller holly trees, but I can understand the need
to keep the growth small within the easement. The existing
bushes in this area appear to be well established and healthy, so,
I can revise the plan to show that no vegetation replacement within
the drainage easement will occur.
Thanks again for your time on this matter.
Brad
From: Glenn Brooks [mailto:GBROOKS @albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:32 PM
To: Bodman, Bradley
Cc: Bill Fritz
Subject: RE: Sam's Club #6365 - Remodel, Charlottesville, VA
I 11'' Ilttli, tt. . .1111 l:' (ti 1 Iii -Iii .`.0 ,t;,Ild-I \t, -1111 ',!1 Ow ,'<Y -x.'11 cn! E!I {1.'• i ;`i ,il. {i '! t'lt X1161 {It -'I
tliiIt't *iti' ll: _ {it. :I +t' ".1ttrt {. '. \!tll i1, ill ?. illiy ,Y!t'„ Il,i` Ililttig',; {\ h.i:i lit'i! {1t ..l1 {f , 1,1'lli:1lFiti; ttU lht \itlh'
From: Bodman, Bradley [mailto:bbodman @Dewberry.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 3:37 PM
To: Glenn Brooks
Subject: Sam's Club #6365 - Remodel, Charlottesville, VA
Mr. Brooks
We are in the process of addressing the County's final comments on the
proposed Sam's Club Remodeling project (County Site Plan Amendment
SDP - 2008 -82). Per County Planning request for vegetative screening at
the rear of the building, we currently propose a row of Holly trees
Foster Holly) along the rear building access drive. The new trees are
positioned such that planting them should not interfere with existing utilities
or drainage structures as well as to provide additional screening consistent
with the configuration of the existing row of trees. However, several
of these new trees would be located within the County's existing 20' Drainage
Easement. Please find attached a pdf of the proposed work at the rear of the
building (top of the sheet) and a pdf of the Drainage Easement Deed for
your information.
My task now, as required by County Planning (Bill Fritz, Chief of Current
Development), is to obtain verification from easement holders that we have
permission to plant the trees within their respective easements. Would this
permission verification be issued from your office, or is there another
individual in County Engineering or Legal Department with whom I would
need to correspond?
Please let me know as soon as you can.
Thank you in advance for your time on this matter.
Brad
Bradley E. Bodman, P.E.
Project Manager
Dewberry
551 Piney Forest Rd.
Danville, VA 24540 -3353
434.797.4497, Ext. 242
434.797 4341 fax
434.713.0071 mobile
www.dewberry.com
Page 1 of 6
Bill Fritz
From: Bodman, Bradley [bbod man @Dewberry.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 6:09 PM
To: Margaret Maliszewski; Bill Fritz
Cc: Mike Phillips; Joe Shoemaker; Bradner, Brian
Subject: RE: Sam's Club - ARB
Il.1 arg:nret
Yes we will be re- subrnitting revised plans together with the l')Uilding
plans in a comprehensive plan set P 2 will be giving n e some
data to put on my p1li ns & then I will send the Civil Pans
to rl er, so they can include them in their plan set. I'm r)lnt r Artaii
cat the exact elate but I believe it will be soon.
Thanks
Brad
From: Margaret Maliszewski [mailto:MMaliszewski @albemarle.org]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:52 PM
To: Jolynda Cooper; Bodman, Bradley
Subject: RE: Sam's Club - ARB
Jolynda,
Do you have any information regarding the paint questions in my previous email?
Brad.
I've seen the emails that have been sent back and forth regarding the landscaping. Will you be submitting a
revised plan?
Thanks.
Margaret
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:03 PM
To: 'Jolynda Cooper'; 'bbodman @dewberry.com'
Cc: Bill Fritz; Brent Nelson
Subject: FW: Sam's Club - ARB
Jolynda and Brad,
Regarding the site plan amendment, the Current Development review for the amendment (SDP- 2008 -82) has not
been completed yet. As I mentioned earlier (see message below), the plan does not include all of the existing
landscaping in the area of work, and some of the proposed planting appears to conflict with some of the utilities. I
can't approve plants in the easements and it is unlikely that the Current Development reviewer will approve the
amendment without resolution of these conflicts. Either the plants need to be shifted out of the easements, or
documentation that the easement holders approve of the landscaping must be provided. Also, please understand
that all landscaping shown on the last approved landscape plan, if not specifically shown on your proposed plan
as to be removed, must remain in place. It would be best to show those existing plants on the plan for clarity and
to avoid confusion later. Please note that my comments do not constitute the Current Development review for the
site plan amendment. The Current Development reviewer indicated that he will forward his comments to you in
the very near future.
Regarding the repainting, the left side elevation indicates that P38, the darker color, is proposed for the cornice
elements of the piers and that P41, the lighter color, is proposed for the upper 2 bands of the piers below the
6/24/2008
Page 2 of 6
cornice. One of these bands is about 10' tall. The one below it is about 2' tall. Currently, the 2' band that runs
between the piers is dark in color. Do you really want to paint the band a light color on the piers, thereby
establishing a discontinuous band, or is the color mislabeled on the drawing? (It also looks like the color numbers
might be reversed at the right side of the entrance, where P41 is labeled at the cornice and P38 is on the upper
part of the wall. This one doesn't matter in my review since it won't be visible from the EC -- it is just FYI.)
Regarding the signage, I will share your submittal with Brent and he will follow up with comments (ARB- 08 -02).
Margaret
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:38 PM
To: 'Jolynda Cooper'
Subject: Sam's Club - ARB
Jolynda,
We have detennined that the produce cooler addition does not need to be taken to the ARB for review because it falls just
outside the ARB's area of authority. I am sorry for the confusion on this issue: it seems there has been a change in
interpretation over the years.
I believe the changes you've made to the proposal have made this a much a better project, and I hope you continue to include
the brick screening wall, the improved planting, and the improved chain link screening in the proposal.
The minor site plan amendment is still required for the proposal. I will still need to approve the revisions to some of the
planting (and to the existing chain link), and I can do that as part of the minor amendment review. The plan submitted for
ARB review did not include all of the existing landscaping, and some of the proposed planting appears to conflict with some
of the utilities. These conflicts will need to be resolved and the minor amendment should clarif that all of the existing
landscaping is to remain unless otherwise noted on the plan. I can help coordinate this with our Current Development
reviewer. ( I spoke with Brad Bodman with Dewberry this morning and updated him on the status of the ARB application.)
Regarding the painting, because the painting is proposed for a portion of the building that falls within the ARB's jurisdiction,
I will also need to review that part of the proposal. When we spoke on the phone yesterday, you indicated that the painting
was part of the previous sign proposal that we also have under review. I checked that file and the only painting that was
proposed with the sign application was the painting of the blue stripe. The architectural elevations included with the cooler
submittal include the re- painting of other EIFS sections of the building. We can handle the review of the EIFS painting with
the sign application, but we will need color samples for the proposed paint (other than the "honor blue "). Are the proposed
colors intended to match the existing colors?
I've copied below some email correspondence between Brent Nelson and Jo Chichester for reference on the sign proposal.
Regarding the status of that submittal, the ARB indicated in February that they could not support the painting of the existing
blue brick, and we are waiting for revised drawings to close out that application. I recommend that we attempt to resolve all
the painting issues with that resubmittal.
Why don't you give me a call once you've read this so we can make sure we're set to tie up all the loose ends?
Thanks.
Margaret
Margaret Maliszewski, Principal Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road, 2nd Floor
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434- 296 -5832 0276; fax: 434-972-4012
6/24/2008
Page 3 of 6
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 3008 4:41 PM
To: 'Jo Chichester'
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -20 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signage: Outstanding Review Items
Ili Jo - It's no problem. Ju,t send it On when e ou yet it.
I a n I <s.
Brent
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
434 - 296- 5832,ext 3372
434- 972 -4012 (fax)
ARB Web Page:
http: 'allemaile.i A`,'deparUnent is }' ?departmc nt== planninre(p.3 e -
From: Jo Chichester [ mailto :.Io.Chichester((
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 4:35 PM
To: Brent Nelson
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -20 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signage: Outstanding Review Items
Hello, Brent:
Just thought 1'd let you know that I have not ignored this issue. I have been trying to <oet NVVI to respond .since you
sent this email.
Are dre OK with vtaitino for that? Let me know.
Appreciate it ... you knoiv that.
Best regards,
Jo. Chichester.
Permit Coordinator
I da s
710 West Rosela
Ro AR 72756
Jo.C'hicl7cster!ci:ph?ac. cum
Phone: (479) 6-,6 -3545 ext. 3598
Fl (888) 656 -3545 ext. 3598
Fax: (479) 621-5202
Web: «%w.pb2companies.com
From: Brent Nelson [ mailto:bnelson((albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 3008 2:22 PM
To: Jo Chichester
Cc: Mike Phillips, Jack Nickell; Andy Harrison; Margaret Maliszewski; Mark Goddard, Jolynda Cooper
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -20 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signage: Outstanding Review Items
Jo - At yesterda \'s A RB meetin- I asked the Board liar direction concerning the approval of m o aspects of y our proposal:
changing the canopy color to Honorable Blue, and placing si_nage with exterior fluorescent lighting on the sidle ofthe
canopy facing the EC. Fhe original 2001 ARB approval of the canopy structure had required the current brick color. With the
Board's direction. I hoped to keep this review on an administrative track as opposed to a full review by the Board. The
6/24/2008
Page 4 of 6
consensus of tfre Board vas that they cot iId support the repainting of the canopy with .S 1J" 6XI I ffolwrahlc Blue as Iottg as the
paint had the same matte finish as the sample provided. Hie Board does not believe that a high gloss finish on the canopy is
appropriate. The Board can support the proposed si-nage oil the Side ofthe canopy facing the EC as lone as it is non -
illuminated. ;ail earlier eniail from you indicated that the proposed tisture would contain a 150 watt fluorescent bulb. In
addition to the ;MUTs position on this li -htimr . the County 7.oninu Oi dinance reLluires that any Iluorescent li-hting exceedin-
the 3.000 Il(Inert:; (or 35 watt) threshold be a full cutotl'Stvle 1i4ture. w hich the one proposed dies not appear to be.
In order to approve this proposal, I would need for you to prop ide me with 2 copies of revised drawings addressing the
t'OIIowinu.
Revise the canopy signage detail on Sheet A2.1 ,Sigr?age Details by removing the proposed lighting and clarify in- on
the drawing that the 1 color proposed lOr the canopy is Sit 6S1l 11oy orahle Blue in a matte finish.
Please contact me should you have any questions.
Brent
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
434-296-5832, ext 3272
434- 972 -4012 (fax)
ARB Web Page:
http:%," albemarle. or,' dep <rrtrent.n;p''.lepartrn:nt planningrelpaa -?-164
From: Jo Chichester [ in ai Ito: Jo.Chichester aipb2ae.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:48 AM
To: Brent Nelson
Cc: Mike Phillips; Jack Nickell; Andy Harrison, Margaret Maliszewski; Mark Goddard; Jolynda Cooper
Subject: 6365 02 -20 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signage: Outstanding Review Items
Hello, Brent:
Can you please g;ie me au update on the status of our submittal? We obviously- were not present at the ARB meeting;
yesterday, so I all] deducting; that you were successful with the administrative review ( ?). The project is currently
scheduled to be submitted to the city on Feb 25.
Thank you as usual for your time and cooperation.
Best regards,
Jo. Chichester,
Permit Coordinator
T
710 West Roselawn
Ro-ers. AR 72756
Jo.Cl2ichester
Phone: (479) 636 -3545 ext. 3598
1'F: (888) 656 -3545 ext. 3598
Fax: (479) 621 -5'03
Web: w %+w.pb2companies.coni
From: Brent Nelson [ill ai Ito: bneIson4raIbemarle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:46 PM
To: Jo Chichester
Cc: Mike Phillips; Jack Nickell: Andy Harrison; Margaret Maliszewski
Subject: RE: 6365 02 -11 -08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signage: Outstanding Review Items
6/24/2008
Page 5 of 6
I'hanks Jo.
YOU did provide a sample of the flonorahle Glitc.
Brent
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
434 -296 -5832, ext 3272
434- 972 -4012 (fax)
ARB Web Pave:
hap: albeinarle. org-' dcpa run e tit. aspAlepartinent— planaing& reIpage2464
From: Jo Chichester [mailto:Jo.Chichesteru pb2ae.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:03 PM
To: Brent Nelson
Cc: Mike Phillips; Jack Nickell; Andy Harrison
Subject: RE: 6365 02-11-08 Charlottesville VA 07 -0066 Sam's Gen Remodel, Signage: Outstanding Review Items
Hello, Brent:
Please be aware that we are gathering information from our MEP consultants to answer your questions regarding the
following:
1. What is the wattage for the fluorescent light bar over the gas station on the canopy?
2. Is the site monument sign illuminated?
Your third question regarding a cross - reference for the "P -6" paint color proposed for the gas station canopy I have
an answer for: It is Sherwin Williams #SW 6811, "Honorable Blue ". I believe 1 did furnish you a sample of that color
in our submitted package. If not, you probably have that reference or, 1 would be more than happy to send you a
sample.
1 will get you the other two answers just as soon as possible.
Thank you for your patience.
Best regards,
Jo. Chichester,
Permit Coordinator
710 West Roselawn
Rogers. AR 72756
J0.Ch ichesterru; pb2ae.com
Phone: (479) 636 -35 45 ext. 3598
IT: (888) 656 -3545 ext. 3598
Fax: (479) 621 -520
Web: `tivtiv.pb2coinpcu1ies.com
From: Brent Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:02 PM
To: Jo Chichester
Cc: Margaret Maliszewski
Subject: Sam's Club, Building Stripe
6/24/2008
Page 6 of 6
Hi Jo - As promised, here is the wording for the Architectural Review Board's consensus regarding the proposed stripe
around the building.
ARB Action Memo
February 4, 2008
OTHER BUSINESS
Sam's Club: Painting the brick band
It was the consensus of the Architectural Review Board that they could not support painting the existing stripe of blue brick
on the building facade with blue paint.
Could you possibly let me know today if they want to take this part of your proposal on to the 2/19/08 meeting. As I
mentioned yesterday, if you remove the building stripe from your proposal, we can go ahead and issue an administrative
approval on the remaining signage proposed.
Thanks,
Brent
Brent W. Nelson
Landscape Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
434- 296 -5832, ext 3272
434- 972 -4012 (fax)
ARB Web Page:
http: albcm.ule.orY,'cleparuntni . aap:'depaitntcnt planning& clpage 2464
6/24/2008