The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800087 Review Comments 2008-06-03Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District June 3, 2008 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975 -0224 TO: Megan Y'aniglos Planning Department RE: Soils Report and Comments for: Charlottesville Albemarle Airport 4i) 77 36C ¢D 4C 1 3E:9B k Mount ;61Buca — V/ ) C R, 37C3 36C 368 w37C3 36P 4 i l 19B 4D (' 37C3d 37C37 \ 36C 4D 37 B 3 - 37C3 36B 3703 3rOC 368 - 4L'' 36B Q 3( 3g 368 C i r 7 B3 W / 65_ 368 G oo • 3CB 3FB ! 7 36C; A7C J — r3 yCC 7 196 94C 37C3 ^ g 3703 - / h f 94B 14F) 7C3 368 a 14a), 198 ` \ 1 - -- 4 7C 36C 3t ( ri37C3 •o 36C w 3 . \ 948 O % 4D /v 37C3 G0 3 658P 14C 3 v. ; rI4A 368 .36C 14FI 7 ! 6v 3 p 4C O 148 14(, 36B 88 / 4 3 3613 7 7 e5B 9 y ., 36C / of w \ / 948 94C O= 3 u of 36D 5C3 ti/ 36C 37C3 ' 198 Lc7 Sac 37D3 4C 36B a \ 4D - .166 368 i6B 21 _ 48 36B 658 // ! 5Q 94C 94B 2083 BOG 36C LB:.1 9 3103 37C3 ° 34C, -'` G / /! ti5B v 37C3 x 4C 20D3 4U • a -/ 948 i 4D 4D 37D3 36C 36B - 36C 370 L3 36C 368 36B urr 94C P 36C / 36B 7 366' 36 4BBC 4D - 783 3G3 h j r y4D 37C3 37D3 D 368 C C 36D 65C 658 14C 4D - C 3 IG I` Q4B3 - - 1 Ri °O -" 6t 14B !3 `? - 198 C e 4D " 368 .._ 3 4f ti 9 ° C 6cB r G 471) nap was compiled by the U.S. 5000 Fe t 4000 3000 griculture, Soil Conservation l - -- USDA United States Natural Department of Resources Agriculture Conservation Service Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District 434 - 975 -0224 Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Airport - Runway Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Chester is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 14D Chester loan, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Chester is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loan about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 6/3/08 flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 37D3 Hayesville clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely erode! Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Rating Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Chester loam, 7 to 15 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 14D Chester loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 37D3 Hayesville clay loam, 15 Not hydric to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 14D Chester loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 6/3/08 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 37D3 Hayesville clay loam, 15 1.5 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Thomas Jetterson SWCD 3 6/3/08 USL)A United States Natural Department of Resources Agriculture Conservation Service Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District 434 - 975 -0224 Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Airport - Runway Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Chester is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 14D Chester loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Chester is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 37C3 Havesville clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 6/3/08 flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 37D3 Hayesville clay loans, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol percent slopes Rating 14D Chester loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 37D3 Hayesville clay loam, 15 Not hydric to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 14D Chester loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 6/3/08 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 37D3 Hayesville clay loam, 15 1.5 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Thomas Jetterson SWCD 3 6/3/08 Application #: WP02008000tb - Short Review Cone ,nts Project Name: Airport Runway 21 Extended Runway Safety Area Stormwater Management/BMP Plan Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Date Completed:06/09/2008 Reviewer:Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:E &SC plan does not appear to protect the downstream properties from possible sediment loss during a runoff producing storm event. This office suggests showing 3 basins located on the streams at the edge of the property. These basins will protect the site work for the duration of the project and can be converted to SWM structures once the site has been stabilized. Please submit copies of all State and Federal permits for the County file. Date Completed:06/09/2008 Reviewer:Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:E &SC plan does not appear to protect the downstream properties from possible sediment loss during a runoff producing storm event. This office suggests showing 3 basins located on the streams at the edge of the property. These basins will protect the site work for the duration of the project and can be converted to SWM structures once the site has been stabilized. Please submit copies of all State and Federal permits for the County file. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, June 09, 2008 Application #: SDP20080008` lShort Review Com... cents Project Name: Charlottesville Albemarle Airport-Major Major Amendment Date Completed: 06/10/2008 Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911 Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: VO OBJECTION. 06/10/2008 Jay Schlothauer Inspections No Objection Based on plans dated May 2008. Vo comments or conditions. 06/05/2008 Max Greene Engineer Z &CD No Objection Fhis project is not authorized in stream buffers per 17 -320 and 17 -321. The Director of Community evelopment has been informed and is working with the County attorney's office to correct the iiscrepancy. 3RC 6/19/08 06/13/2008 Margaret Maliszewski ARB No Objection f hese improvements are not expected to be visible from the Entrance Corridor. Consequently, ARB eview is not required. 06/16/2008 Megan Yaniglos CDZCD No Objection PG : 22. 1 c'Vd 3 t tAKAA-ti&A : s Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Friday, May 08, 2009 Application #: SDP200800087 Short Review Comments Project Name: Charlottesville Albemarle Airport -Major Major Amendment Date Completed: 06/05/2008 Reviewer: Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status: Administrative Denial Reviews Comments: This project is not authorized in stream buffers per 17 -320 and 17 -321. SRC 6/19/08 Date Completed: Reviewer: Megan Yaniglos CDZCD Review Status: Pending Reviews Comments: Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed on: Thursday, June 05, 2008 I Albemarle Gunty Service Authority TO: Megan Yaniglos FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: June 16, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for:Charlottesville Albemarle Airport SDP200800087 TM 32 -10 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service 2. An inch water line is located approximately distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. 4. A inch sewer line is located approximately distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Improvements will not impact ACSA utilities. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434977 -4511 • Fax (434)979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org Site Review Meeting Megan Yaniglos From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ Joel .Denunzio@VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:18 AM To: Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: Site Review Meeting Megan, Page 1 of 2 I am sorry I forgot to include the airport project in my comments. I did review them and found that they are not proposing any changes to roads or within roads ROW so I have no comments. It looks like all they are doing is extending an internal service road at the airport and they are not even making an additional connection to a state road. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Joel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 Joel . den unziotd >v dot, virginia.gov From: Megan Yaniglos [ mailto:myanigios @albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:54 PM To: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. Subject: RE: Site Review Meeting Joel: Did you have any comments for the Charlottesville /Albemarle Airport amendment? SDP2008 -087? Thanks. megan yaniglos, ASL 4 senior planner Albemarle County CornmunitN Development Department Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 ph: 434.296.5832 x. 3004 fax: 434.972.4035 From: Denunzio, Joel D., P.E. [ mailto:J oel.Denunzio @VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:47 PM To: Glenn Brooks Cc: Jack Kelsey; Amy Pflaum; Andrew Lowe; Claudette Grant; Elaine Echols; Francis MacCall; Gerald Gatobu; Joan McDowell; John Shepherd; Jonathan Sharp; Juandiego Wade; Judith Wiegand; Lisa K. Glass; Margaret 6/19/2008 Site Review Meeting Page 2 of 2 Maliszewski; Max Greene; Megan Yaniglos; Patrick Lawrence; Philip Custer; Rebecca Ragsdale; Scott Clark; Summer Frederick Subject: Site Review Meeting Glenn, Attached are VDOT's comments for the June 19th site review meeting. Thanks, Joel SDP June 19 2008 comments.pdf>> Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434 - 293 -0011 Ext. 120 noel. den unzioOdvdot.virginia.gov 6/19/2008 0 CHO CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE A t R P O R T 100 BOWEN LOOP, SUITE 200 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 Ph 434.973.8342 Fx 434.974.7476 Via U.S. Mail & Facsimile to 434 -296 -3510 April 30, 2009 Dr. Charles Hurt Virginia Land Company 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: Proposed Stream Improvements Dear Dr. Hurt: As you may be aware, we are initiating the first phase of our Runway 21 Extension constructionprojectthisspring/summer. As part of this project, the County Engineer is requiring the following two improvements be made to the stream running beside Crickenberger Lane, along the property line between yourpropertyandMr. Jack Crickenberger's property: 1. Stream Restoration - Stabilize and restore the eroded stream banks for a length of approximately 400' from the double 36" pipe crossing. This is proposed to be completed by installation of plant rolls and fiber mating, which are intended to facilitate increased vegetative growth, which will in turn stabilize the areas. 2. Fill Over Stream Crossing — Place two feet of fill over the existing double 36" pipes which were recently replaced where Crickenberger Lane crosses the stream. Stone/gravel will be placed along a 200' section of roadway. Depending on conditions, this may require replacement of the two metal pipes with concrete pipes. These improvements are not being made as a result of any increases in flow from the airport. Infact, the runoff from the airport is being significantly reduced as a result of large storm water management detention facilities (ponds) being constructed for the project. The County readily A admits that the stream condition at the airport outfall is in good condition, and that the eroded areas are further downstream. The cost of the stream improvements will be borne entirely by the airport, utilizing project funds. The improvements will require approval of both yourself and Mr. Crickenberger, as well asvariousregulatoryagencies. Accordingly, we are requesting a meeting with you on site, in ordertopresentandreviewtheproposedplansforthework. We would also present the anticipatedtimelineandscheduleforcompletionoftheworkYouwillbeaffordedanopportunityto provide comments on the plan, which will be presented to the County and regulatory agencies forconsiderationandapproval. The regulating agencies include the County, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. We presently have a meeting set with Mr. Crickenberger on Wednesday May 6, 2009, at 10:00AM, and would like to meet with you at that same time if possible. If you cannot meet on that day, however, we can schedule a separate meeting at your convenience. If you are unable, or do not desire to attend a meeting, we would be happy to send you the proposed plans for review and comment. In either case, we will be requesting written authorization to complete the work shown on the plans and permission to enter your property. If you wish to further expedite the process, you can sign this letter and return it to us, and that can serve as your written authorization to complete the work. Prior to actual construction, we will contact you regarding the schedule for the work. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Bill Pahuta with any questions. Sincerely, arbara Hutchin Executive Director RECEIVED MAY o 6 209 i r` Page 1 of 1 Elizabeth Marotta IS D-F I- c 7) From: Philip Custer Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 2:32 PM To: James D. Nixon, Jr.; Susan E. Winslow; William M. Eschenfelder; Barbara Hutchinson Cc: Amy Pflaum; Glenn Brooks; Elizabeth Marotta; Ray Lilly Subject: Engineering Approval of Airport SWM and downstream channel plans (WPO- 2008 - 00059) Good afternoon, The Stormwater Management Plans and downstream channel analysis (WPO- 2008 - 00059), submitted 4 May 2009 (with additional sheets emailed on 8 May 2009), have been received by Engineering Review and meet Albemarle County minimum checklist for approval. The plans can be approved once the necessary offsite easements and approval letters from USACE and Virginia DEQ are received by engineering review. Once these documents have been handed over to the county, the applicant must provide 4 full sets of the plan (excluding sheets 59 -85) and 1 copy of the SWM plan (sheets 1, 3, 5, 8, 13 -16, 35, 42, 43A, 43B, 50, 51, and 52) to engineering. The E &SC bond amount is $637,500. The SWM bond amount is $182,600. The forms and instructions to post these bonds can be found on the Community Development Department Web site on www.albemar",or You may contact Pam Shifflett (Albemarle County Department of Community Development) at ext. 3246 for further information on bonding procedures. With the approval of this WPO plan, Current Development Engineering Review has no objection to the approval of SDP - 2008 - 00087. I have notified the project's lead planner, Elizabeth Marotta (in place of Megan Yaniglos). that all engineering concerns have been satisfied. Once the offsite easements and approval letters have been received, all WPO bonds posted, and the site plan approval process completed, you may contact the Department of Community Development to arrange a pre - construction meeting with a County Erosion & Sediment Control Inspector. Should the County Inspector find the limits of disturbance increased or the need for additional control measures required to protect the site, additional fees will be required. Please also note that should the Program Authority determine that the skimmers do not provide satisfactory sediment control in the field, a stop work order will be issued for the project until an alternative is designed and approved. Please contact me should you have any question. Thanks, Phil 434)296 -5832 x3072 5/11/2009 cHo CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE A I R P O R T May 12, 2009 100 BOWEN LOOP, SUITE 200 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 Ph 434.973.8342 j l E = Fx 434.974.7476 MAY 2 0 2009 C.A.A.A. Mr. Jack Crickenberger i 4230 Chris Greene Lake Road Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: Proposed Stream Improvements Dear Mr. Crickenberger: As was discussed at our meeting last Wednesday, May 6, 2009, we are initiating the first phase of our Runway 21 Extension construction project this spring/summer. As part of this project, the County Engineer is requiring the following two improvements be made to the stream running beside Crickenberger Lane, along the property line between your property and Dr. Hurt's property: 1. Stream Restoration - Stabilize and restore the eroded stream banks for a length of approximately 400' from the double 36" pipe crossing. This is proposed to be completed by installation of plant rolls and fiber mating, which are intended to facilitate increased vegetative growth, which will in turn stabilize the areas. 2. Fill Over Stream Crossing —Place two feet of fill over the existing double 36" pipes which were recently replaced where Crickenberger Lane crosses the stream. Stone/gravel will be placed along a 200' section of roadway. Depending on conditions, this may require replacement of the two metal pipes with concrete pipes. These improvements are not being made as a result of any increases in flow from the airport. In fact, the runoff from the airport is being significantly reduced as a result of large storm water management detention facilities (ponds) being constructed for the project. The County readily admits that the stream condition at the airport outfall is in good condition, and that the eroded areas are further downstream. The cost of the stream improvements will be borne entirely by the airport, utilizing project funds. Prior to actual construction, we will contact you regarding the schedule for the work as well as to verify the proposed barb wire fence alignment. To reiterate, we will keep the new barb wire Mr. Jack Crickenberger May I2, 2009 Page (2) fence alignment as close to the top of bank as possible so as to not restrict the areabetweenthestreamandthehillsideabove. Also, we will request that the Contractor stockstockpile alremovedfencematerialforyourfutureuse. A I These improvements will require your written approval. If you wish, you may sign this letterandreturnittous, and that can serve as your written authorization to complete the work. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Bill Pahuta with any questions. Sincerely, garbara Hutchinson Executive Director BH.ibc r • '•''• t . GT COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRGINIA. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY VALLEY REGIONAL OFFICE lw Preston Bryant, Jr. 4411 Early Road, P.O. Box 3000, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801 David K. PaylorSecretaryofNaturalResources (540) 574 -7800 Fax (540) 574 -7878 Director vw%v.deq.virVinia.gov Charlottesville/Albemarle Airport Authority c/o Mr. Robert Neely Mill Creek Environmental Consultants, Ltd. 3940 Palmer Road Massanutten, VA 22840 May 18, 2009 Amy Thatcher Owens Regional Director RE.- Application Number 08 -934 -- Crickenberger Lane Culvert Replacement, Albemarle County Notification of No Permit Required Dear Mr. Neely: The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) received your revised submittal on March 16, 2009 for the referenced project. Based on the information provided in the submittal, it does not appear that a Virginia Water Protection (VWP) permit will be required because the project as presented qualifies for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regional, General or Nationwide Permit for which DEQ has provided 401 Water Quality Certification. If the above - listed exclusion describes your project, it will not need a VWP permit but may require review or approval under other federal, State, or local programs. Should the size and scope of the project change, a VWP permit may be required. If you have any questions, please contact Eric Millard at (540) 574 -7813 or ermillard@deq.virginia.gov. Any unexpected environmental impacts, environmental emergencies or spills must be reported to the Virginia Department of Emergency Management's Emergency Operations Center at 1 -800 -468 -8892 within 24 hours of discovery. Sincerely, B. K ' Fowler Regional Water Permits Manager cc: Nora Iseli, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vincent Pero, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers File DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NORFOLK DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT NORFOLK, 803 FRONT STREET I 1 NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23510 -1096 May 27, 2009 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: CENAO -REG Western Virginia Regulatory Section Central Virginia Regulatory Field Office 444 Abby Lane Howardsville, Virginia 24523 RE: # NAO- 2008 -00924 (Jacobs Run headwaters) Description: Permit modification to project description and authorization: In addition to the upgrade of an existing, damaged stream crossing by replacing the crushed culvert with two 36 inch culverts to address expected high flows, and installation of a trash barrier, approximately 400 linear feet of bioengineered bank stabilization will be implemented downstream of the improved crossing. Portions of the stabilization will take place below ordinary high water and include installation of jute matting /mesh, planting, sprigging, and /or seeding of vegetation, etc. for stabilization purposes. Location: At Crickenberger Lane at the Charlottesville /Albemarle Regional Airport property in Albemarle County Charlottesville /Albemarle County Airport Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. c/o Mill Creek Environmental Consultants Attn: Robert Neely 3940 Palmer Road Massanutten, VA 22840 Dear Mr. Neely: This is regarding your request to perform work in the waters of the United States, as described above. These activities have been reviewed and found to satisfy the criteria contained in the Corps Nationwide Permits 3 and 13, attached. The Corps Nationwide Permits were published in the March 12, 2007, Federal Register notice (72 FR 47) and the regulations governing their use can be found in 33 CFR 330 published in Volume 56, Number 226 of the Federal Register dated November 22, 1991. Provided the enclosed conditions are met, an additional Department of the Army Permit will not be required. In addition, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has issued unconditional 401 certification for Nationwide Permit Number 3 and 13 therefore no additional permit will be required from the DEQ. A permit may be required from your local city or county government, and you must obtain that approval, if necessary. Enclosed is a "compliance certification" form, which must be signed and returned within 30 days of completion of the project, including any required mitigation (see nationwide permit condition number 14). Your signature on this form certifies that you have completed the work in accordance with the nationwide permit terms and conditions. This verification is valid until March 18, 2012 unless the Norfolk District Engineer uses discretionary authority to modify, suspend or revoke this verification. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve 12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If you have any questions please contact Nora Iseli at 434/263 -8247 or nora.m.iseli @usace.army.mil SEE ALL ENCLOSURES. For Richard Henderson, Deputy Chief and Chief, Western Virginia Regulatory Section: Sincerely, Nora Iseli, P.W.D. Central Virginia Regulatory Field Office