Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800102 Review Comments 2008-05-15Application #: SDP20 (Short Re Comr -Imt$ Project Name: iMt Calvary Baptist Church- Prelim nary I (Final — Non - residential —Commission Date Completed: 08/23/2007 Reviewer: Joan McDowell Planning Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: !Rural Areas Planning Comments - Condition 6: No indication of the fence on the site plan; please have the applicant submit a photograph or drawing of the proposed fence and the proposed height you, Joan McDowell Principal Planner, Rural Areas Date Completed: 09/26/2007 Reviewer: Joan McDowell Planning Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: iWe will review the fence detail when the landscape plan is submitted with the final plan. Date Completed: 05/15/2008 Reviewer: Joan McDowell Planning Review Status: Pending Reviews Comments: ( Compliance with Condition of Approval number 6 is required. (See comment dated 8/23/07 and I 9/26/07) Please call me at 434/296 -5823 X 3249, if you have any questions. Joan McDowell - - Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 JGI°julf' r t w County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Megan Yaniglos, Current Development Project Planner From: Phil Custer, Current Development engineering review Date: 4 September 2007 Subject: Mount Calvary Baptist Church (SDP- 2007 - 00075) The preliminary site plan for the Mount Calvary Baptist Church has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development requests changes to this preliminary site plan. Some of the following review comments are final site plan comments but need to be addressed with the preliminary site plan because the changes could affect the layout of the site: The proximity of construction to property lines will necessitate that temporary construction easements be acquired from the neighboring property owners. The applicant should provide letters of intent from these property owners before preliminary approval. The applicant should take into consideration the erosion and sediment control measures needed to protect the site throughout construction when determining the needed boundaries of the easements. 2. Please show all existing and proposed storm drainage features. [18- 32.5.6j] Runoff from the eastbound lane of Morgantown Rd. appears to be routed through the site to an adjacent property via a 15" CMP culvert and a series of 4" VCP pipes that were not shown on the site plan. With the Final Site Plan, the applicant will be required to upgrade this system and provide computations for the water being conveyed through the property. A permanent drainage easement will need to be shown over the conveyance system carrying this water and should be considered in the site layout. The minimum width of this easement is 20ft and may be larger if a pipe of a depth greater than 8ft is used. 4. The site plan submittal appears to be lacking preliminary stormwater quality and quantity computations. Engineering cannot recommend approval without being provided these analyses. [18- 32.5.6k] The applicant needs to provide more details for the conceptual Stormwater Management Plan. Engineering staff is concerned about the condition, location, and capacity of the existing offsite swale. The applicant should either obtain permission to upgrade the existing channel on the adjacent property or submit a detailed analysis of the channel showing adequacy. The southern SWM facility appears to be too far from the parking lot to accept the majority of the parking lot runoff through sheet flow. [18- 32.5.6k] Engineering staff is concerned with the proposed asphalt curb which is intended to direct stormwater to a catch basin. The applicant should provide more detail regarding their intention. [18- 32.5.6k] S. As shown, the proposed retaining wall blocks access to the Stormwater Management Facility. A driveable access easement must be provided for maintenance purposes. [18- 32.5.6k] 9. The applicant needs to show sight distance triangles on the site plan. If a sight distance easement will Current Development Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 be required, the applicant must furnish proof than an easement can be obtained from adjacent property owners. [VDOT, DM] 10. County records indicate that the TMP for this site is 58A1 -19 and not 58A1 -20 as indicated on the plan. [18- 32.5.6a] 11. Please provide a pedestrian travelway from the southern parking lot to the church. [ 18- 32.7.2.8] 12. A guardrail will be required in the parking area to prevent cars from falling off the wall. It appears that there may not be enough room from the edge of the pavement to the back of the retaining wall to install this guardrail. 13. Please state how the proposed one -way circulation is to work with no proposed signage or pavement markings. [18- 32.7.2] OF AL County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Richard Claridge (rclaridgeCwsanders- pc.com) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: June 10, 2008 Subject: SDP -2007 -075- Mt. Calvary Baptist Church- Tentative Final Site Plan The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following continents are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [4.17] Indicate on the lighting plan that the light fixture is full cut -off. Also, show the photometrics along all property lines to insure that the spill over is .5 footcandles or less. 2. [32.7.9.7] Interior landscaping area equal to five (5) percent of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be landscaped with trees or shrubs. This landscaping shall be located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas. The interior landscaping provided is located in one area, revise landscape plan so that proposed trees and shrubs are dispersed along the parking areas. 3. [32.7.9.9] Provide the canopy calculations for each type of tree or shrub in the landscaping schedule (le Cercis canadensis area of canopy is 124 square feet x the number proposed (3) = 372 square feet) Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3004 for further information. t Ikct COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: SDP -2008 -00102 & WPO -2008- 00051, Mt. Calvary Baptist Church Plan preparer: Tom Muncaster, DDR [fax: 434 - 979 -1681] Owner or rep.: Mt. Calvary Baptist Church Plan received date: May 13, 2008 Date of comments: June 27, 2008 Reviewer: Andrew Lowe The final site plan for Mount Calvary Baptist Church, submitted on 5/13/08, has been reviewed. The plans cannot be approved as submitted and will require the following changes /corrections prior to final approval. Engineering is available from 2 -4 PM on Thursdays to discuss these review comments. Please call Andy Lowe at 434 -296 -5832 ext. 3860 or email alowe(a >albemarle.org to schedule an appointment. Please note that Albemarle County has updated the Design Manual [DM]. The DM and Engineering Review Final Plan Checklist can be downloaded from the County's web site under the subtitle "Design Standards ". A. Final Site Plan (SDP- 2008 - 00102) 1. VDOT final approval is needed before engineering can recommend final approval. 2. Please provide an entrance profile. 3. Provide sight distance triangle. 4. Provide specific detail and dimensions (outside footer to inside guardrail) for the retaining wall and guardrail at the parking spaces. It may not meet minimum requirements for parking overhang of 2 feet. [18- 4.12.6.C.6] 5. Show guardrail at the upper parking lot near the building. 6. Clarify the location where the wall begins and ends. It does not appear to end at the location shown. 7. Provide temporary grading easements on parcels 58A1 -17, 58A1 -23 & 58A1 -24. 8. Show curb throughout the parking and travelways. 9. Provide stormwater pipes details and profiles. 10. All parking rows must be protected by minimum 3' curbed island. [18 -4.12] 11. There appears to be slopes steeper than 2:1 at the culvert crossing Morgantown Road. Please show a blow -up detail with additional topography in this area including the grading for the new ditch. 12. Additional comments may be forthcoming during next review due to revisions. B. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan: WPO- 2008 -00051 1. Please provide a diversion dike from the sediment trap along the east boundary line to direct flow the rest of the site. 2. Provide details for all ESC practices per Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. 3. Additional comments may be forthcoming during next review due to revisions. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 2 C. Stormwater Management Plan: WPO- 2008 -00051 4. Please provide manufacturer's approval letter for the Filterra units. 5. Please provide manufacturer's approval letter for the Raintanks. 6. Provide Minimum Standard 19 Adequate Channel information for the concentration of stor nwater from structure #I. For drainage area #2 show the grading work necessary for the level spreader installation and provide detail with comps. The slope from the level spreader must be 10% and adequately stabilized with grass to prevent erosion. Additional comments may be forthcoming during next review due to revisions. 1p\ Al. gym 7 w COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone(434)296 -5832 Fax(434)972 -4126 Project: SDP -2008 -00102 R WPO -2008- 00051, Mt. Calvary Baptist Church Plan preparer: Dex Sanders [dsandersL,sanders- pc.com] Owner or rep.: Mt. Calvary Baptist Church Plan received date: Rev.2): Sept. 25, 2008 Date of comments: Rev.2): Oct.. 10, 2008 Reviewer: Andrew Lowe Rev.2): John Diez A. Final Site Plan (SDP- 2008 - 00102) Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 B. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan: WPO- 2008 -00051 C. Stormwater Management Plan: WPO- 2008 -00051 Migineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 The Final Site Plan submitted 25 September 2008 has received Engineering Review and meets Albemarle County minimum checklist items for approval of Erosion & Sediment Control and Stormwater Management. Please submit 5 paper copies of the Plan to Current Development Engineering. The E &SC bond amount is $9,400. The SWM bond amount is $55,500. Please contact Pam Shifflett (Albemarle County Department of Community Development) at ext. 3246 for bonding procedures. A completed copy of the Standard Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and fee for recordation for the stormwater facilities is required prior to final approval.[17 -304E] The forms and instructions can be found on the County Web site. Once the E &SC bond and the SWM bond have been posted, you may contact the Department of Community Development to arrange a pre - construction meeting. In addition, should the County Inspector find the limits of disturbance increased or the need for additional control measures required to protect the site, additional fees will be required. Please contact Megan Yaniglos of Current Development Planning at ext. 3004 regarding approval of the Final Site Plan.