HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800113 Review Comments 2008-08-04Jl pt t r
mow"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
DATE: August 4" 2008
Todd Philipp
Dominion Development Resources 11.0
Charlottesville, VA, 2291E
RE: SDP- 2008 -00113 Hol v mead Toren Center Area Al - Final.
Dear Sir. Madam.
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary
comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies.
as applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner)
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer)
Albenmarle County L)ivision of Planning (Principle Planner AR13)
Ihemarle County Division of Planning (Principle Planner Development Areas)
Albemarle County Division of Inspections ( Building Official)
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT).
Albemarle County Service Authority (AC SA).
Albemarle County Fire and Rescue.
Albemarle County Geographic and Data Services (GUS)
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed. and should
not he considered final. Howe\er, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
could affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site
Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions. please submit in writing
justification for not incorporating; such revisions. Submit eight (S) full size copies and one (11 11'' 17"
copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached
comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday August 18th 2009. Failure to submit this
information by this date will result in suspension of the revi schedule. Review will resume'. hen
revisions are submitted along v ith a reinstatement fee of S65.
Please contact me at your earliest con\ enience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely.
r 1
Gerald Gatobu, Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Current Development
401 Melntire Road
Charlottesville. VA 22902 -4596
Phone: (434)296-5832 Ext 3385
Fax: (434)972 -4126
1--
Countx. of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Todd Philipp
From:Gerald Gatobu, Senior Planner
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date:July 31. 2008
Subject: SDP2008- ()01 Holly Town Center Area Al
The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend
approval of the final site plan referred to above once the following comments have been addressed:
Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference. which is to the Subdivision Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
ACC section 32.5.61
A) The Final Prior to Preliminary Site Plan shall contain the following information.
Zoning proffers and bonus factors applicable to the site including any: all special use permit
conditions: Show ZMA 2005 -015 and SP200S -27 on the site plan. i.e. ZMA and SP numbers.
proffers and conditions that apply to this area (Al) must be on the siteplan.
Yard and building separation requirements. Consider a boundary line adjustment to bring all
the development under one parcel. The site plan shots boundary lines crossing along the
development.
B) Written schedules or data as necessary to demonstrate that the site can accommodate the
proposed use, including:
Maximum number of employees. (Indicate on the site plan the proposed number of
employees).
Schedule of parking including, maximum amount required and amount provided; Office
parking formula used instead of Retail. !Section 4.12 of ACCT. The parking calculation on
the siteplan uses the formula provided for office space. The development is mostly retail
with the exeption being the bank ihuiidin LK). Retail building formula based on square
footage should be used for the retail buildings. (Refer to the approved application plan and
the ACC section 4.12 for guidance)
Parallel spaces shown next to building A on the application plan must he shown on this site
plan. (Refer to the application plan for ZMA2005 -15j
Maximum amount of impervious cover on the site
If a landscape plan is required. maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation
areas. [Section 32 of .4CC1: Indicate on page C2 the maximum amount of paved parking and
vehicular circulation areas for the entire site.
C) If phasing is planned, phase tines and proposed timing of development.
Is there a proposed timing of development fbr future phase 2? Proffer 11 requires that there he
additional public space constructed as a plaza area identified as "Plaza Amenity" on the
a p lieation plan_ of no less than 5000 square feet for thepurpose of public gathering and
passive outdoor recreation. [Refer to ZMA2005 -15 proffer #11 for further details].
D)
Refer to ACC Section 4.2] Show on an existing conditions page with all areas of the site
where existing slopes are twenty -five (25) percent or greater.
E) Existing landscape features as described in section 32.7.9.4.c.
Please include on'in the site plan an existing conditions page that shows the existing features
pre- development). [Refer to ACC section 32.7.9.4.c]
F) The name and location of all watercourses and other bodies of water adjacent to or on the site.
Indicate on the site plan the name of the water body (creek) adjacent to the site.
N) Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including:
Sidewalks: Sidewalks and pedestrian crossings shown on the application plan are not shown on
the site plan. A sidewalk needs to be shown between building A and C along with the
corresponding cross walk. A sidewalk also needs to he shown on the north eastern most corner
of the site plan by the parking area adjacent to Building A. [Refer to the approved application
plan sheet A21
Loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks,
parking lots and driveways; and signs. [ACC Section 4.12.13 Loading Areas]: Indicate on the
site plan the loading area and truck route as shown on the application plan. Dumpster locations
for all buildings that are (4000) gross square feet or more. Buildings A, D, and E do not have
dumpster locations.
0) All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use.
ZMA2005 -15 Proffer Number 8. Indicate on the site plan land to he dedicated as Oreenwav to
Albemarle County. The land to be dedicated as .greenwav should be identified on the site plan
as "Greenwav Area dedication to Albemarle County This shall include all flood plain area
along Powel Creek. This shall be in fee simple and a minimum of 4.5 acres_LRefer to approved
application plan sheet A2. and Z11A2005 -15 proffer #81
Q) Where deemed appropriate by the agent due to the intensity of development, estimated traffic
generation figures for the site based upon current Virginia Department of Transportation rates.
ZMA 2005 -15 proffer number 5 Intersection analysis must be addressed with this site plan..
first site plan for the project. [Refer toZ_\IA 2005 -15 proffer #5 for more details].
1. LightingiPhotometric Plan
A) Make sure light fixture location do not conflict with utilities and landscaping.
B) All light fixtures with 3,000 or more lumens must he full cut off. Provide cut sheets with
detailed evidence that the fixtures are full cut off.
C) One label A fixture, and one label B2 fixture are missing, or show the location (plan is huge) I
may have missed them when counting.
1
D) Add the standard lighting note to the lighting plan. (Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a
lamp that emits 3.000 or more initial lumens shall he a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in the residential or rural areas zoning
districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle. "]
2. Landscape Plan
A) Acer rubrum "Karpick" is not on the plant list showing total canopy area. Let me know where
you found the 397 total canopy (SF) for this particular tree.
fi) QP Quercus phellos Willow Oak: 1 counted 107 of these on the site plan. I may have not seen
the one missing (plan is quite large) so please make sure they are 108 Willow Oaks and
indicate where they are located on the site plan..
C) LIT Lannestromia indica Tuskegee: has various symbols that so not match. Please use one
s.,Trthol that will make it easy to locate this tree on the site plan. There are more than 25 trees
with the LIT symbol.
D) PXJ Prunusx incamp Okame Cherry should have a height of at least 6' -7' to use the 99 (SF)
total canopy area shown on the canopy calculation. (refer to the approved plant canopy
calculations list found on the Albemarle County Site)
E) IAF Foster Holly: Has the same symbol as PO Serbian Spruce, Consider using a different
syrnbol for the foster holly. I could only count 10 foster hollies: this may be because several
other plants share almost the sarne symbol on the site plan. Please indicate where the rest of the
eight 8 foster Holly's are located.
f) PLOL Prunus Laurocerasus Otto Luuken: 1 counted 248 of these tress on the site plan. Please
show where the missing 33 are located on the site plan in case I missed them when counting.
G) CJ Crt ptomeria japonica I oshino: 1 counted 19, 13 missing, or show their location.
PI) PO Picea omorika Counted 47. 6 missing, or show their location.
Jasminum nudiflorum Hinter famine: None found. Missing or please show their location.
Please contact Gerald Gatobu at the Division of Zoning and Current Development at 2% -5832 ext.
3385 for further information.
3
41
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Gerald Gambit. Current Development Project Planner
From: Phil Custer. Current Development engineering review
Date:05 Ak 22008
Subject: IfoI1 .head Towncenter Al (SDP-200S-00113)
The final site plan for i lollyinead Towncenter A 1 has been reviewed. The following comments arc
provided:
1. The applicant will need an approved WPO plan before the final site plan is approved. At this
time, a WPO application has not yet been received. The applicant should prepare the WPO
plan to meet all conditions listed in ZM A proffer 47.
2. An analysis of the intersection of Connor's Drive and Towncenter Drive needs to be submitted
with this site plan. (ZMA proffer 1
3. A public transportation stop needs to he shoran in this site plan meeting the requirements
specified in the approved rezoning plan. (ZMA proffer 73)
4. The location and grading of the greenway trail need to he shown in this site plan. tivith
particular attention paid to the crossing of Meeting St.
5. A sidewalk Southwest of Building A is required. The Z\IA showed a sidewalk in a curbed
island that was removed with this latest submittal.
6. A modification to the parking space standard needs to he approved by Zoning to allow for the
diamond- shaped tree island.
7. The site plan needs to he sealed. signed, and dated by a licensed professional. [18-32.6.11
S. Please provide the date of the topography on the plan. [1S-32.6.6]
9. Shmy the two benchmarks on the plan. [I)\1]
10. The stream buffer is not shown on the plan. The label is on the plan, hut not the puffer line.
17-317]
11. Please specify which walls require a safety rail. [DM]
12. Guardrail is required on top of a wall adjacent to a parking or travel area. [1S-32.7.2]
13. Drainage easements are only needed on storm pipes carrying water from another parcel or
public ROW.
14. Show all SWM and access easements on this site plan.
Current Development
Fngineering Review Comments
Pane 2 of' 4
15. All drainage easements should be sized according to the formula specified in the design
manual. For example, the drainage easement along Route 29 is well undersized. [DM]
16. No trees or structures are allowed within drainage easements. [DM]
17. All entrances must he labeled with a VDOT designation. 1 1 8 -4.1?. 1 7]
18. The southeastern entrance does not have a landing that is less than 4 for the first 4011. [I8-4.12.17]
19. Please show the necessary sight distance lines on the site plan and provide anv sight easementsifneeded. [DM]
20. VDOT approval is required. At this time, VDOT approval has not vet been received.
21. Please label all tum and taper lanes adjacent to site entrances.
22. The County Code requires that all internal site entrances keep 100t1 sight distance, There
appears to be sight distance issues behind Building A, around the hank drive -thru, and fromtheentrancesontoConnor's Dri near sanitary manhole K. [18-4.12.15]
23. It appears that CG -6 is provided on the plan but not labeled. [DM]
24. The dumpster behind building .1 needs to be moved or realigned. Considering, the length of agarbagetruck. it appears this dumpster is inaccessible as drawn. [DM]
25, Parking areas exceed j °<, grade in some places. For instance, the areas are round inlet 4 and81areover5%. Please check the remainder of the site for similar issues. [ 18- 4.12.15]
26. The sidewalk northeast of Building 0 needs to he widened to 611 or bumper blocks need to beplacedintheparkingspaces. The sidewalk is measured as 5.5ft wide. [ 18- 4.12.16]
27. Behind Building J. there appears to be a low spot in the pavement without a drainage
structure. Please correct so that there is no standing water on site.
28, The trash compactors behind building A will require a concrete pad. [DM]
29. Drainage cannot run across. through, or backwater in dumpster areas. It appears that thisoccursatthedumpstersnorthwestofbuildingB, adjacent to inlet 63. and near inlet 42A.Please correct. [18-4.12. 1 U]
30. Are the three separate parcels to remain or will the parcels he combined? lithe parcels are toremainthenthefollowingwillherequired: Connors Drive needs to he designed as a privateroadwithaprofile: access easements shown on all sidewalks and travelwav aisles: parkingwillneedtoworkforeachseparateparcelunlessparkingagreementsaresignedbetween
property owners_ drainage easements should he placed on the pipes carrying water from
upstream properties VDOT ROW. One property line travels through 3 different huildinrs. _'>,boundary line adjustment should he submitted or permission needs to he given from the
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
building official before the plan is approved.
31. Please show a stop sign from the site entrance onto Meeting St.
32. Please provide a street name sign at the intersection of Connor's Drive and Towncenter Dr.
DM]
33. Please provide a traffic generation and distribution summary for the entire site. [DM]
34. Show where each asphalt pavement section should be constructed 011 site. [DM]
35. Please add to the dumpster pad and sidewalk details that the concrete is to he "28 days or
stronger". [DM]
36. Please provide typical retaining wall details that include any necessary safety rail or guardrail.
DM]
37. Please provide details for pipe outlets at hiofilters that use a retaining wall as an endwall.
Drain profiles should be adjusted to match details. site plan. Details will also be needed for
retaining wall footers located directing over a storm drain pipe.[D 'v1]
aft. Please show access easements on the plan.
30. In the drainage profiles, please show a VIX)T designation for each structure. [DM]
40. In the drainage profiles, please show the throat length for each curb inlet. [DM]
41. In the drainage profiles. please show the grate type for each drop inlet. [DM)
42. VDOT standard IS -1 is required on all structures where flow drops are 40 or greater. This
includes drop from the surface to the bottom of the manhole. [DM]
43. In the drainage profiles. please show end - sections or end -walls at the end ()Fall storm sewer
systems. [DM]
44. hi the drainage profiles, please show the scour protection at the pipe outlets. This scour
protection should match the computations. [DM -I]
45. Please show structure 51) in the drainage profiles.
46. Please raise the elevation of the outlet pipes directing water into each Not to :ninimize
water hacking up in the storm sewer system,
47. The invert of Inlet 30 is =inches lower than the bed elevation. See previous comment.
4S. Please include in this set the profile of the eastern storm sewer along Route 29.
49. Please accurately show the topography for pipe systems passing from or through biofilters and
under through retaining walls. [DM]
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
50. Please provide storm pipe capacity calculations. [DM]
51. Spread calculations are not shown for all necessary inlets (92. 93. all curb cuts). All spreads
should be below 1011. [DM]
52. The curb inlet calculation table appears to he incorrect. Many of the slopes listed in the table
for gutter slope and pavement cross -slope do not match up with the grading as shown. Half of
the calculations do not include a gutter slope. Inlet 3 should be calculated as an inlet in a
sump condition, but the spreads from both the left and the right side need to he computed. A
full review of the curb inlet and spread calculations was not performed and additional
comments may be !given on the resuhmittal. Please refer to chapter 9 of the VD()T Drainage
Manual.
53. One hundred percent capture cannot he confirmed at the southeastern entrance because inlets
92 and 93 are not shown in the calculations. [DM]
54. Provide ditch computations for channels created in the parking lot to confirm that the spread is
below l Oft. [DM]
55. Inlets 7 and 22 are located on grade and not in sump conditions. Engineering review is
concerned that a considerable percentage of the design storm will bypass these inlets.
56. Provide outlet protection computations. [DM]
57. The grading and drainage area to the "curb cut at hiofilter 4" does not appear to he correct.
Please clarify. [DM]
58. Please be sure to remove all temporary ESC pipes from the site plan. [DM]
59. Please show the work to extend the VDOT pipe at the southern entrance. A profile of this
system should be prop ided.
60. Grading in the northern corner of the site. adjacent to the roundabout. must be minimized. All
proposed grades in the parking lots. travelways. and roads surrounding the "Phase 2 area
must tie into existing contours as quickly as possible using 3:1 contours. Also, the wall along
Meeting St. should be reduced to the maximum extent possible and will need a determination
from the Planning Department whether a Variation will be needed for the new wall (in the
place of Building N in the approved /MA).
Service Auth6nty
TO: Gerald Gatobu
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: July 31, 2008
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Hollymead Towncenter -Area 1 Final
SDP200800113
TM 32 -45, 42A. 44
The below checked items apply to this site.
X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
X 2. An 8 inch water line is located on site.
X 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located 200' distant from this site plan.
is 2487 Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
X 4. A 10 inch sewer line is located on site.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7.and plans are currently under review.
8.and plans have been received and approved.
9. No plans are required.
X 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting tentative approval.
11. Final site plan may/may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
Comments: Backftow prevention is required. Provide plumbing fixture count to
size the meters. Show meter locations. A permanent sewer flow meter must be
installed per agreement (attachment).
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations water line size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
168 SpO;i aG Read `.s(i31:GP<<'S'd 111c • VA 22911 Tel :424) 97; Fax :4744l 979 _ . `.*:
jww.ser Sceat3tiVin,:y.o g
a t.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
MEMORANDUM
TO:Gerald Gatobu, Current Development
Phil Custer, Current Development
FROM:Elaine Echols, Planning
RE:SDP200800113 — Hollymead Town Center Area A -1
DATE:August 1, 2008
I have reviewed the site plan referenced above and offer the following comments:
1. Parallel spaces in front of Kohl's are an important feature which must be provided.
If the applicant wishes to remove the requirement for the spaces, the Zoning
Administrator must first determine that they are features that can be varied. If
such a determination is made, Planning can process the request; however, it is
unlikely that the request would be granted since they were requested as part of
the rezoning process and were important features
2. Sidewalks across the eastern most part of the site were shown on the Rt. 29 side
of the buildings on the application plan. They are now shown on the other side of
the building. The configuration of the sidewalks could be varied, if the Zoning
Administrator agrees that this kind of variation is possible. Such a variation would
likely be approved because sidewalks are provided on the western side of the
buildings that create pedestrian connectivity across the front of the site. The
applicant should just be aware of any pedestrian needs he might have for
maintenance of the part of the building that faces Rt. 29.
3. Please consult with Bill Fritz and Zoning on whether or not the applicant can
pursue final site plan approval without including the 5 square foot public plaza
on the northwest corner of the site. It is Planning preference to see this area
built sooner rather than later since it is a key feature of the development.
Application #:SDP200800113 Short Review Comments
Project Name: Hollymead Towncenter - Area Al - Final Final - Non - residential - Commission
Date Completed.08/0412008
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT THIS OFFICE WITH A LIST OF POTENTIAL ROAD NAMES
FOR APPROVAL BY THIS OFFICE.
Date Completed:07,'2312008
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated July 14, 2008.
Delete all property lines that bisect buildings.
Bldg. B - Provide a curb cut at the building entrance.
Bldg. C - Provide barrier -free parking spaces near the curb cut.
Bldg. K - Relocate the barrier -free parking spaces to be near the curb cut. or vice versa
Bldgs. F, G, H and I- Provide barrier -free parking spaces. and curb cuts at the building entrances.
Parallei barrier -free parking spaces must have a dedicated 5' wide (8' for van - accessible) adjacent
unloading space that is not in a travelway. nor onto a sidewalk with a curb.
Date Completed:0712212008
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: An ARB submittal is required for this proposal. ARB approval is required prior to final site plan
approval. Applications, checklists, schedules and guidelines are available on line at
www.albemarle.org.
Date Completed:07131/2008
Reviewer:Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
Review Status:Pending
Reviews Comments:
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On, Monday, August 04, 2008
Page 1 of 1
Philip Custer
From: Philip Custer
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 11:05 AM
To:Todd Philipp'; 'michael hodgdon'
Subject: Hollymead Al Engineering comments
Todd,
Over the last few days I was able to answer some the questions that we discussed at last week's SRC meeting.
Please see my responses below:
Curb Island Waiver
Ron Higgins from Zoning ok'ed the parking island configuration.
Sight distance around_ bank behind building A, and at the intersection to Conners drive
After looking at the plan again, it appears that the sight distance around Conner's Drive may not be as
problematic as it first looked. Please provide sight distance triagles to confirm that there are no obstructions of
sight lines in the next resubmittal.
The 100ft sight distance requirement behind Kohl's has been waived by the Zoning Department. For the sight
distance around the Kohl's loading area, I recommend that you still make some accommodations to make that
blind corner safer. For instance, if you striped /hatched the pavement in the area so that approach vehicles are
guided away (by 5 -10ft) from the corner it would provide more reaction time for vehicles in the area.
After looking more closely at the sight distance around the bank, it was noticed that the dimensions of this site
plan do not match those shown on the approved ZMA. Please match all dimensions of the approved ZMA
plan for the bank area. The sight distance requirement around the bank area will be waived by Zoning.
Drainage Easement along Route 29
This easement needs to be widen to the width required by the formula in the County's Design Manual.
Engineering review understands this area's importance to other agencies and will allow the landscaping as
proposed to remain in the easement. I have not yet been told how this requirement changes if Al does not add
water to this system. The requirement to widen the easement will remain a comment of mine, whether water from
Al is added to the pipe system or not, until I am told otherwise. The easement needs labelled as "dedicated to
public use" because it will convey water from a VDOT ROW.
Please contact me should you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Phil
296 -5832 x3072
8/11/2008
r'n Op , f
Nome
1` y.p
F
RGo
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Gerald Gatobu, Current Development Project Planner
From:Phil Custer, Current Development engineering review
Date:05 August 2008
Subject: Hollymead Towncenter Al (SDP- 2008 - 00113)
The final site plan for Hollymead Towncenter Al has been reviewed. The following comments are
provided:
1. The applicant will need an approved WPO plan before the final site plan is approved. At this
time, a WPO application has not yet been received. The applicant should prepare the WPO
plan to meet all conditions listed in ZMA proffer #7.
2. An analysis of the intersection of Connor's Drive and Towncenter Drive needs to be submitted
with this site plan. (ZMA proffer #5)
3. A public transportation stop needs to be shown in this site plan meeting the requirements
specified in the approved rezoning plan. (ZMA proffer #3)
4. The location and grading of the greenway trail need to be shown in this site plan, with
particular attention paid to the crossing of Meeting St.
5. A sidewalk Southwest of Building A is required. The ZMA showed a sidewalk in a curbed
island that was removed with this latest submittal.
6. A modification to the parking space standard needs to be approved by Zoning to allow for the
diamond - shaped tree island.
7. The site plan needs to be sealed, signed, and dated by a licensed professional. [18- 32.6.1]
8. Please provide the date of the topography on the plan. [18- 32.6.6]
9. Show the two benchmarks on the plan. [DM]
10. The stream buffer is not shown on the plan. The label is on the plan, but not the buffer line.
17 -317]
11. Please specify which walls require a safety rail. [DM]
12. Guardrail is required on top of a wall adjacent to a parking or travel area. [18- 32.7.2]
1 13. Drainage easements are only needed on storm pipes carrying water from another parcel or
public ROW.
14. Show all SWM and access easements on this site plan.
Lie klird Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
15. All drainage easements should be sized according to the formula specified in the design
manual. For example, the drainage easement along Route 29 is well undersized. [DM]
16. No trees or structures are allowed within drainage easements. [DM]
17. All entrances must be labeled with a VDOT designation. [18- 4.12.17]
18. The southeastern entrance does not have a landing that is less than 4% for the first 40ft. [18-
4.12.17]
19. Please show the necessary sight distance lines on the site plan and provide any sight easements
if needed. [DM]
20. VDOT approval is required. At this time, VDOT approval has not yet been received.
421. Please label all turn and taper lanes adjacent to site entrances.
22, The County Code requires that all internal site entrances keep 100ft sight distance. There
appears to be sight distance issues behind Building A, around the bank drive -thru, and from
the entrances onto Connor's Drive near sanitary manhole K. [18- 4.12.15]
23. It appears that CG -6 is provided on the plan but not labeled. [DM]
The dumpster behind building J needs to be moved or realigned. Considering the length of a
garbage truck, it appears this dumpster is inaccessible as drawn. [DM]
25. Parking areas exceed 5% grade in some places. For instance, the areas are round inlet 4 and
81 are over 5 %. Please check the remainder of the site for similar issues. [18- 4.12.15]
1.--- 26. The sidewalk northeast of Building 0 needs to be widened to 6ft or bumper blocks need to be
placed in the parking spaces. The sidewalk is measured as 5.5ft wide. [18- 4.12.16]
27. Behind Building J, there appears to be a low spot in the pavement without a drainage
structure. Please correct so that there is no standing water on site.
28. The trash compactors behind building A will require a concrete pad. [DM]
29. Drainage cannot run across, through, or backwater in dumpster areas. It appears that this
occurs at the dumpsters northwest of building B, adjacent to inlet 63, and near inlet 42A.
Please correct. [18- 4.12.19]
30. Are the three separate parcels to remain or will the parcels be combined? If the parcels are tot-t i.4., v.
i remain then the following will be required: Connor's Drive needs to be designed as a private
road with a profile; access easements shown on all sidewalks and travelway aisles; parking
will need to work for each separate parcel unless parking agreements are signed between
property owners; drainage easements should be placed on the pipes carrying water from
upstream propertiesNDOT ROW. One property line travels through 3 different buildings. A
boundary line adjustment should be submitted or permission needs to be given from the
Y Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 4
building official before the plan is approved.
31. Please show a stop sign from the site entrance onto Meeting St.
32. Please provide a street name sign at the intersection of Connor's Drive and Towncenter Dr.
DM]
33. Please provide a traffic generation and distribution summary for the entire site. [DM]
34. Show where each asphalt pavement section should be constructed on site. [DM]
35. Please add to the dumpster pad and sidewalk details that the concrete is to be "28 days or
stronger ". [DM]
36. Please provide typical retaining wall details that include any necessary safety rail or guardrail.
DM]
37. Please provide details for pipe outlets at biofilters that use a retaining wall as an endwall.
Drain profiles should be adjusted to match details /site plan. Details will also be needed for
retaining wall footers located directing over a storm drain pipe. [DM]
38. Please show access easements on the plan.
39. In the drainage profiles, please show a VDOT designation for each structure. [DM]
40. In the drainage profiles, please show the throat length for each curb inlet. [DM]
41. In the drainage profiles, please show the grate type for each drop inlet. [DM]
42. VDOT standard IS -1 is required on all structures where flow drops are 4ft or greater. This
includes drop from the surface to the bottom of the manhole. [DM]
43. In the drainage profiles, please show end - sections or end -walls at the end of all storm sewer
systems. [DM]
44. In the drainage profiles, please show the scour protection at the pipe outlets. This scour
protection should match the computations. [DM]
45. Please show structure 59 in the drainage profiles.
46. Please raise the elevation of the outlet pipes directing water into each biofilter to minimize
water backing up in the storm sewer system.
47. The invert of Inlet 30 is 3inches lower than the bed elevation. See previous comment.
48. Please include in this set the profile of the eastern storm sewer along Route 29.
49. Please accurately show the topography for pipe systems passing from or through biofilters and
under /through retaining walls. [DM]
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
50. Please provide storm pipe capacity calculations. [DM]
51. Spread calculations are not shown for all necessary inlets (92, 93, all curb cuts). All spreadsshouldbebelow10ft. [DM]
52. The curb inlet calculation table appears to be incorrect. Many of the slopes listed in the table
for gutter slope and pavement cross -slope do not match up with the grading as shown. Half of
the calculations do not include a gutter slope. Inlet 3 should be calculated as an inlet in a
tie sump condition, but the spreads from both the left and the right side need to be computed. A
t full review of the curb inlet and spread calculations was not performed and additional
comments may be given on the resubmittal. Please refer to chapter 9 of the VDOT DrainageManual.
53. One hundred percent capture cannot be confirmed at the southeastern entrance because inlets
92 and 93 are not shown in the calculations. [DM]
54. Provide ditch computations for channels created in the parking lot to confirm that the spread isbelow10ft. [DM]
55. Inlets 7 and 22 are located on grade and not in sump conditions. Engineering review is
concerned that a considerable percentage of the design storm will bypass these inlets.
56. Provide outlet protection computations. [DM]
Y 57. The grading and drainage area to the "curb cut at biofilter 4" does not appear to be correct.
Please clarify. [DM]
58. Please be sure to remove all temporary ESC pipes from the site plan. [DM]
59. Please show the work to extend the VDOT pipe at the southern entrance. A profile of this
system should be provided.
60. Grading in the northern corner of the site, adjacent to the roundabout, must be minimized. All
proposed grades in the parking lots, travelways, and roads surrounding the "Phase 2" area
must tie into existing contours as quickly as possible using 3:1 contours. Also, the wall along
Meeting St. should be reduced to the maximum extent possible and will need a determination
from the Planning Department whether a variation will be needed for the new wall (in the
place of Building N in the approved ZMA).
1 J : J p I' ,& p2Ot OOO 17.t oc
Jig rf
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
DATE: August 4 ", 2008
Todd Philipp
Dominion Development Resources LI.0
Charlottesville, VA, 2 1.
RE: SDP -2008 -00113 Hollymead Town Center Area Al - Final.
Dear Sir`Madam,
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary
comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies.
as applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner)
Albemarle County Division of Zoning Current Development (Engineer)
Albemarle County L)ivision of Planning (Principle Planner ARB)
Albemarle County Division of Planning (Principle Planner Development Areas)
Albemarle County Division of htspeetions (Building Official)
Virginia Department of Transportation (\'DOT).
Albemarle County Set Authority (ACSA).
Albemarle County Fire and Rescue.
Albemarle County Geographic and Data Services (GDS)
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed. and should
not be considered final. however, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
could affect approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site
Review Committee. It you choose not to make the requested re%isions. please submit in writing
justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (S) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 1
copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached
comments of the Site Review Committee by Monday August 18th 2009. Failure to submit this
information by this date Nvill result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when
re% isions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of S65.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
s
Gerald Gatobu, Senior Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Current Development
401 IVIcintire Road
Charlottesville. VA 2 -4596
Phone: (434)296- 5832 Ext 3385
Fax: (434)972 -4126
s
it .ti l
d V
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Todd Philipp
From:Gerald Gatobu, Senior Planner
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date:July 31. 2008
Subject: SDP2008 -0011 3 Hollvrnead Town Center Area Al
The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend
approval of the final site plan referred to above once the following comments have been addressed:
Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference. which is to the Suhdivision:'Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
ACC section 32.5.6!
A) The Final Prior to Preliminary Site Plan shall contain the following information.
eyicl:- 64, at Zoning proffers and bonus factors applicable to the site including any/all special use permit
fzrl5C' 277 conditions: Show ZMA 2005 -015 and SP2005 -27 on the siteplan. i.e. ZMA and SP numbers.
provers and conditions that apply to this area (Al) must be on the siteplan.
si Yard and building separation requirements. Consider a boundary line adjustment to bring all
t• , 4, e development under one parcel. The site plan shows boundary lines crossing along; the
4R\_` development. 5 /ANA - A tu. S it
B) Written schedules or data as necessary to demonstrate that the site can accommodate the
propos d use, including:
J l number of employees. (Indicate on the site plan the proposed number of
i
7' jUe. owl employees). ---
5 ia Schedule of parking including maximum amount required and amount provided; Office
parking formula used instead of Retail. !Section 4.12 of ACCT. The parking calculation on
V\the site plan uses the formula provided for office space. The development is mostly retail
G with the exception being the bankjbuitding K). Retail building formula based on square
footage should be used for the retail buildings. (Refer to the approved application plan and
the ACC section 4.12 for guidance)
Pr' Parallel spaces shown next to building A on the application plan must be shown on this site
plan. (Refer to the application plan for ZMA2OOS -1 t.Z Maximum amount of impervious cover on the site S
If a landscape plan is required. maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation
areas. [Section 32 of ACC]: indicate on page C2 the maximum amount of paved parking and
vehicular circulation areas for the entire site.
MaXbt t) M qt Of feints
MaYMAVAM OVu. ttt af- iAJ ZW an s l n /GY( Dn - 172 5 i
AAA AV AA, AM t&F c PAvect otA4 'r&-PO o.d \reil^-ciAJ
t
amid 01,4Thk
C) I phasing is planned, phase lines and proposed timing of development.
Is there a proposed timing of development for future phase 2? Proffer #11 requires that there be
L6
t ,
2/ additional public space constructed as a plaza area identified as "Plaza Amenity" on the
application plan, of no less than 5000 square feet for the purpose of public gathering and
e0 passive outdoor recreation. f Refer to ZMA2005 -15 proffer #11 for further detailsJ.
D) il
t Refer to ACC Section 4.2] Show on an existing conditions page with all areas of the site
where existing slopes are twenty -five (25) percent or greater.
E) Existing landscape features as described in section 32.7.9.4.c.
V
Please include on /in the site plan an existing conditions page that shows the existing features
V f pre- development). jRefer to ACC section 32.7.9.4.0
F) The name and location of all watercourses and other bodies of water adjacent to or on the site.
Indicate on the site plan the name of the water body (creek) adjacent to the site.
N) Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including:
Sidewalks: Sidewalks and pedestrian crossings shown on the application plan are not shown on
the site plan. A sidewalk needs to be shown between building A and C along with the
corresponding cross walk. A sidewalk also needs to be shown on the north eastern most corner
of the site plan by the parking area adjacent to Building A. [Refer to the approved application
plan sheet A21 5 C Arp(i aoln 'f )
oading and service areas together with the propo sed paving material types for all walks,
parking lots and driveways; and signs. [ACC Section 4.12.13 Loading Areas]: Indicate on the
G site plan the loading area and truck route as shown on the application plan. Dumpster locations
for all buildings that are (4000) gross square feet or more. Buildings A, D, and Edo not aye
dumpster locations. Loodivs S ftr (telA I ` ifA(1 ah ' t4 4 e-at
Mv$t iv h •
O) 11 areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use.
ZMA2005 -15 Proffer Number 8. Indicate on the site plan land to be dedicated as Greenway to
Albemarle County. The land to be dedicated as greenway should be identified on the site plan
as " Greenway Area dedication to Albemarle County". This shall include all flood plain area
along Powel Creek. This shall be in fee simple and a minimum of 4.5 acres.LRefer to approved
application plan sheet A2, and ZMA2005 -15 proffer #81
Q) Where deemed appropriate by the agent due to the intensity of development, estimated traffic
gene Lion figures for the site based upon current Virginia Department of Transportation rates.
MA 2005 -15 proffer number 5 Intersection analysis must be addressed with this site plan i.e.
first site plan for the project. [Refer to ZMA 2005 -15 proffer #5 for more details].
1. Li i ing/Photometric Plan
Make sure light fixture locations do not conflict with utilities and landscaping.
All light fixtures with 3,00() or more lumens must be full cut off. Provide cut sheets with
detailed evidence that the fixtures are full cut off.
90ne label A fixture, and one label B2 fixture are missing, or show the location (plan is huge) 1
may have missed them when counting.
1
D)the standard lighting note to the lighting plan. [Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a
amp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in the residential or rural areas zoning
districts shall not exceed one- half footcandle."]
2. ndscape Plan
Acer rubrum "Karpick" is not on the plant list showing total canopy area. Let me know where
found the 97 total canopy (SF) for this particular tree.
4/7156 P Quercus p e os Willow Oak: I counted 107 of these on the site plan. 1 may have not seen
the one missing (plan is quite large) so please make sure they are 108 Willow Oaks and
indicate where they are located on the site plan..
C }F Langestromia indica Tuskegee: has various symbols that so not match. Please use one
symbol that will make it easy to locate this tree on the site plan. There are more than 25 trees
with the LIT symbol.
Prunus x incamp Okame Cherry should have a height of at least 6' -7' to use the 99 (SF)
total canopy area shown on the canopy calculation. (refer to the approved plant canopy
calculations list found on the Albemarle County Site)
FF Foster Holly: Has the same symbol as PO Serbian Spruce. Consider using a different
e' symbol for the foster holly. I could only count 10 foster }lollies; this may be because several
other plants share almost the same symbol on the site plan. Please indicate where the rest of the
eight 8 foster Holly's are located.
PLLOL Prunus Laurocerasus Otto Luyken: I counted 248 of these tress on the site plan. Please
show where the missing 33 are located on the site plan in case I missed them when counting.
J Cryptomeria japonica Yoshino: I counted 19, 13 missing, or show their location.
1-fib Picea omorika Counted 47, 6 missing, or show their location.
1 ...JNJJasminum nudiflorum Winter Jamine: None found. Missing or please show their location.
Please contact Gerald Gatobu at the Division of Zoning and Current Development at 296 -5832 ext.
3 385 for further information.
i
i
1
s
3
JL
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Gerald Gatobu, Current Development Project Planner
From: Phil Custer. Current Development engineering review
Date:05 Au{aust 2008
Subject: lioll. Towncenter Al (SDP-2008-001131
The final site plan for lloll4mead Towncenter Al has been reviewed. The following. comments are
provided:
1. The applicant will need an approved WPO plan before the final site plan is approved. At this
time, a WPO application has not vet been received. The applicant should prepare the WP()
plan to meet all conditions listed in ZM A proffer #
2. An analysis of the intersection of Connor's Drive and Towncenter Drive needs to be submitted
with this site plan. (ZMA proffer 77.'5)
3. A public transportation stop needs to be shown in this site plan meeting the requirements
specified in the approved rezoning plan. (ZMA proffer 43)
4. The location and grading of the greenway trail need to he shown in this site plan, a ith
particular attention paid to the crossing of Meeting St.
5. A sidewalk Southwest of Building A is required. The ZNIA showed a sidewalk in a curbed
island that was removed with this latest submittal.
6. A modification to the parking space standard needs to he approved by Zoning to allow for the
diamond- shaped tree island.
7. The site plan needs to be sealed, signed, and dated by a licensed professional. [18-32.6.11
S. Please provide the date of the topography on the plan. [18-32.6.6]
9. Show the two benchmarks on the plan. [DM]
10. The stream buffer is not shown on the plan. The label is on the plan, but not the buffer line.
17-317]
11. Please specify which walk require a safety rail. [DM]
12. Guardrail is required on top of a wall adjacent to a parking or travel area. [18-32.7.2]
13. Drainage easements are only needed on storm pipes carrying water from another parcel or
public ROW.
14. Show all SWM and access easements on this site plan.
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 4
15. All drainage easements should be sized according to the formula specified in the design
manual. For example. the drainage easement along Route 29 is well undersized. [DM]
16. No trees or structures are allowed within drainage easements. [DM]
17. All entrances must he labeled with a VDOT designation. [ IS-4.12.17]
18. The southeastern entrance does not have a landing that is less than 4 i, for the first 40ft. [18-
4 .12 17]
19. Please show the necessary sight distance lines on the site plan and provide any sight casements
if needed. [DM]
20. VDOT approval is required. At this time. VDOT approval has not vet been received.
21. Please label all turn and taper lanes adjacent to site entrances.
22. The County Code requires that all internal site entrances keep 100ft sight distance. There
appears to he sight distance issues behind Building A, around the bank drive -thru, and from
the entrances onto Connor's Drive near sanitary manhole K. [18-4.12.15]
23. It appears that CG -6 is provided on the plan but not labeled. [DM]
24. The dumpster behind building .1 needs to he moved or realigned. Considering the length of a
garbage truck, it appears this dumpster is inaccessible as drawn. [DM]
25. Parking areas exceed 5% grade in some places. For instance, the areas are round inlet 4 and
81 are over 5%, Please cheek the remainder of the site for similar issues. [18-4.12.15]
26. The sidewalk northeast of Building 0 needs to he widened to 6I1 or bumper blocks need to he
placed in the parking spaces. The sidewalk is measured as 5.5ft wide. [1 8- 4.12.16]
27. Behind Building J. there appears to be a low spot in the pavement without a drainage
structure. Please correct so that there is no standing water on site.
28. 'File trash compactors behind building A will require a concrete pad. [DM]
29. Drainage cannot run across. through. or backwater in dumpster areas. It appears that this
occurs at the dumpsters northwest of building 13. adjacent to inlet 63. and near inlet 42A.
Please correct. [18-4.12.19]
30. Are the three separate parcels to remain or will the parcels be combined'? If the parcels are to
retrain then the following will be required: Connors Drive needs to be designed as a private
road with a profile: access easements shown on all sidewalks and travelway aisles: parking
will need to work for each separate parcel unless parking agreements are signed between
property owners: drainage easements should be placed on the pipes carrying water from
upstream properties VDOT ROW. One property line travels through 3 different buildings. A
boundary line adjustment should be submitted or permission needs to be given from the
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of4
building otlicial before the plan is approved.
31. Please show a stop sitm from the site entrance onto Meeting St.
32. Please provide a street name sign at the intersection at'Connor's Drive and Towncenter Dr.
DM]
33. Please provide a traffic generation and distribution sutmnary for the entire site. [DM]
34. Show where each asphalt pavement section should he constructed on site. [DM]
35. Please add to the dumpster pad and sidewalk details that the concrete is to he "2S days or
stronger - - . [DM]
36. Please provide typical retainint.t gall details that include any necessary safety rail or guardrail.
DM]
37. Please provide details for pipe outlets at hiotilters that use a retaining wall as an cndwall.
Drain profiles should be adjusted to match details, site plan. Details will also be needed for
retaining wall footers located directing over a storm drain pipe.[DM]
38. Please show access easements on the plan.
39. In the drainage profiles. please show a VDOT designation for each structure. [DM]
40. In the drainage profiles, please show the throat length for each curb inlet. [DM]
41. in the drainage profiles, please show the grate type for each drop inlet. [DM[
42. VDOT standard IS -1 is required on all structures where flow drops are 4et or greater. This
includes drop from the surface to the bottom of the manhole. [DM]
43. In the drainage profiles. please show end - sections or end -walls at the end of all storm sewer
systems. [DM]
44. In the drainage profiles. please show the scour protection at the pipe outlets. This scour
protection should match the computations. [ DM]
45. Please show structure 9 in the drainage profiles.
46. Please raise the elevation of the outlet pipes directing water into each hiotiher in !ninimize
water hacking up in the storm sewer system.
47. The invert of Inlet 30 is 3inches low=er than the bed elevation. See previous comment.
48. Please include in this set the profile of the eastern storm sewer along Route 29.
49. Please accurately show the topography for pipe systems passing from or through hiotilters and
under'throuoh retaining walls. [DPI]
Current Development
Engineering Review Comments
Page 4 of 4
50. Please provide storm pipe capacity calculations. [DM]
51. Spread calculations are not shown for all necessar,v inlets (92. 93. all curb cuts). All spreads
should be below 1()ft. [DM]
52. The curb inlet calculation table appears to be incorrect. Many of the slopes listed in the table
for gutter slope and pavement cross - slope do not match up with the grading as shown. Flalf of
the calculations do not include a gutter slope. Inlet 3 should be calculated as an inlet in a
sump condition, but the spreads from both the left and the right side need to he computed. A
full review of the curb inlet and spread calculations was not performed and additional
comments may be given on the resuhnittal. Please refer to chapter 9 of the \DO1 Drainage
Manual.
53. One hundred percent capture cannot be confirmed at the southeastern entrance because inlets
92 and 93 are not shown in the calculations. [DM]
54. Provide ditch computations for channels created in the parking lot to confirm that the spread is
below ]Ott. [DM]
55. Inlets 7 and 22 are located on grade and not in sump conditions. Engineering review is
concerned that a considerable percentage of the design storm a ill bypass these inlets.
56. Provide outlet protection computations. [I)\4]
57. The grading and drainage area to the "curb cut at hiofiiter 4" does not appear to he correct.
Please clarify. [DM]
58. Please be sure to remove all temporary ESC pipes from the site plan. [DM]
59. Please show the work to extend the \'DO'I pipe at the southern entrance. A profile of this
system should be provided.
60. Grading in the northern corner of the site. adjacent to the roundabout. must be minimized. All
proposed grades in the parking lots. travelvvays. and roads surrounding the "Phase 2 area
must tie into existing contours as quickly as possible using 3:1 contours. Also, the wail along
Meeting St. should be reduced to the maximum extent possible and will need a determination
from the Planning Department whether a variation will be needed for the new wall (in the
place of Building N in the approved ZMA).
Service AuthOnty
TO: Gerald Gatobu
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: July 31, 2008
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Hollymead Towncenter-Area 1-Final
SDP200800113
TM 32 -45, 42A, 44
The below checked items apply to this site.
X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
X 2. An 8 inch water line is located on site.
X 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located 200' distant from this site plan.
is 2487 Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
X 4. A 10 inch sewer line is located on site.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7.and plans are currently under review.
8.and plans have been received and approved.
9. No plans are required.
X 10. Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting tentative approval.
11. Final site plan may. /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide plumbing fixture count to
size the meters. Show meter locations. A permanent sewer flow meter must be
installed per agreement (attachment).
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations water line size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
Road • s{^ r'.o' - s I • \ ' 22 Tel r 1 : ) 1 _ a 7h G6Cyr''. SF.t;`:'iCi RGa' a3 t„ 1,:, • /r\ 1 i : -s° - , , aK =+ 676
sd`h'4k.serv;ce aUfl.5` y.o` ,
iiF.
m
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
MEMORANDUM
TO:Gerald Gatobu, Current Development
Phil Custer, Current Development
FROM:Elaine Echols, Planning
RE:SDP2008001 1 3 — Hollymead Town Center Area A -1
DATE:August 1, 2008
1 have reviewed the site plan referenced above and offer the following comments:
1. Parallel spaces in front of Kohl's are an important feature which must be provided.
If the applicant wishes to remove the requirement for the spaces, the Zoning
Administrator must first determine that they are features that can be varied. If
such a determination is made, Planning can process the request; however, it is
unlikely that the request would be granted since they were requested as part of
the rezoning process and were important features
2. Sidewalks across the eastern most part of the site were shown on the Rt. 29 side
of the buildings on the application plan. They are now shown on the other side of
the building. The configuration of the sidewalks could be varied, if the Zoning
Administrator agrees that this kind of variation is possible. Such a variation would
likely be approved because sidewalks are provided on the western side of the
buildings that create pedestrian connectivity across the front of the site. The
applicant should just be aware of any pedestrian needs he might have for
maintenance of the part of the building that faces Rt. 29.
3. Please consult with Bill Fritz and Zoning on whether or not the applicant can
pursue final site plan approval without including the 5 square foot public plaza
on the northwest corner of the site. It is Planning's preference to see this area
built sooner rather than later since it is a key feature of the development.
1
Application #:sbP2oo800113 Short Review Comments
Project Name. Hollyrnead Towncenter - Area Al - Final Final — Non - residential — Commission
Date Completed.08/04/2008
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT THIS OFFICE WITH A LIST OF POTENTIAL ROAD NAMES
FOR APPROVAL BY THIS OFFICE.
Date Completed:07,2312008
Reviewer:Jay Schiothauer Inspections
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated July 14, 2008.
Delete all property lines that bisect buildings.
Bldg. B - Provide a curb cut at the building entrance.
Bldg. C - Provide barrier -free parking spaces near the curb cut.
Bldg. K - Relocate the barrier -free parking spaces to be near the curb cut, or vice versa.
Bldgs. F. G, H and I - Provide barrier -free parking spaces. and curb cuts at the building entrances.
Parallel barrier -free parking spaces must have a dedicated 5' wide (8' for van - accessible) adjacent
unloading space that is not in a travelway, nor onto a sidewalk with a curb.
Date Completed:07122/2008
Reviewer:Margaret Maiiszewski ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: An ARB submittal is required for this proposal. ARB approval is required prior to final site plan
approval. Applications, checklists, schedules and guidelines are available on line at
www.albemarle.org.
Date Completed:07131(2008
Reviewer:Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD
Review Status:Pending
Reviews Comments:
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On • Monday, August 04, 2008