Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZTA201600001 Minutes 2016-04-06COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE TRANSMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA TITLE: ZTA 2016-01 Eligible Applicants SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Public Hearing to Amend the Zoning Ordinance to Address Requirements When an Easement Holder Files for a Special Use Permit, Special Exception or Variance AGENDA DATE: April 6, 2016 STAFF CONTACT(S): Amanda Burbage, Amelia McCulley, Greg Kamptner PRESENTER (S): Amanda Burbage BACKGROUND: On February 23, 2016, the Planning Commission adopted an expanded Resolution of Intent (Attachment B) and recommended approval of ZTA 2016-01 by a vote of 7:0, as recommended by staff with one grammatical correction, if the Board of Supervisors is satisfied that 1) the county is appropriate in the role of interpreting private easement terms, 2) there is a clear understanding of what happens if a property owner objects, and 3) the Board is satisfied that the process for notifying an owner as provided in the ordinance is acceptable (Attachment A). The Planning Commission's action letter, staff report, and minutes from the meeting are attached (Attachments C through E). DISCUSSION: The staff report for the February 23, 2016 Commission public hearing (Attachment D) outlines the background and provisions of the proposed ordinance amendment. Staff's responses to the Commission's recommended conditions for approval are provided in italics. 1) The Board of Supervisors is satisfied that the county is appropriate in the role of interpreting private easement terms The County Attorney's office routinely evaluates deeds between private parties, as well as articles of incorporation, operating agreements, by laws, and resolutions of private entities in order to make various decisions affecting a land use application. The easement holder will have the burden of demonstrating to the satisfaction of the County that the special use permit that it seeks would allow a use that clearly falls within the scope of the easement. 2) There is a clear understanding of what happens if a property owner objects The County is legally required to process a complete application within an established timeframe set forth in the ordinance. An application will not be deemed complete if the County Attorney's office finds any information provided by the applicant to be inadequate in satisfying the County's ordinance requirements. A property owner who disagrees with the determination that the easement holder is an eligible applicant may have standing to appeal the determination to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Processing the special use permit application would be stayed until the BZA acts on the appeal. In the absence of an appeal pending before the BZA, once the County deems an application to be complete, any disputes between the property owner and the easement holder regarding the application are a private matter and would not halt the County's review process without the consent of the applicant. For example, the County is obligated to process a subdivision application even if it violates the terms of private covenant. 3) The Board is satisfied that the process for notifying an owner as provided in the ordinance is acceptable The ordinance proposes written notice to the property owner(s) sent by mail to the address on record within 10 days of receiving the complete application. This new notification requirement ensures that the property owner(s) receives early notice that an application has been made. In addition, current notification requirements associated with a special use permit application include written notice of the community meeting, a sign posted on the property, a legal ad prior to each public hearing, and written notice prior to each public hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed zoning text amendment (Attachment A). ATTACHMENTS: A — Proposed Ordinance B — Resolution of Intent C — February 23 Planning Commission action letter D — February 23 Planning Commission staff report E — February 23 Planning Commission minutes