HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900034 Review Comments 2009-04-24nF (AL1 19
L _
IRG11
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
April 24, 2009
Scott J Swanson AIA
Gresham, Smith and Partners
10 South Sixth St. Suite 100
Richmond VA 23219
RE: ARB2009 -00018 Martha Jefferson Hospital — 29 North / Proffit Additions
Tax Map 32A, Section 2 Parcel 1 A
Dear Mr. Swanson:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on April 20, 2009, completed a preliminary review of
the above -noted request to renovate an existing building, construct an addition to the building, and expand required site
improvements including parking. The Board offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's next
submittal. Please note that the following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments
may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes to the plan.
1. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations to include a schedule listing all proposed materials and colors. The schedule should
include the manufacturer's name, product ID, and color for all proposed materials. Revise the building elevations to
clearly indicate the location of each material. Revise the design of the southeast porte - cochere to either more
effectively integrate with the architecture of the building or identify itself as a pavilion -like element. Revise all
applicable drawings to clearly indicate the proposed materials and colors.
2. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations to include a dashed outline delineating the height and location of the rooftop
equipment. Dimension the drawing to show the distance from the top of the equipment to the top of the screen. Add
a note to Sheet A.301 Elevations and Sheet 2 of 3 Layout & Utility Plan stating: All rooftop equipment shall not be
visible from the Route 29N Entrance Corridor.
3. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include details of all plant materials proposed for the bio- filter adjacent to the
southwest boundary. A planting design that disguises the utilitarian purpose of this facility would be appropriate.
4. Revise the Existing Conditions Plan, Layout & Utility Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan to show the location,
species, and size of all existing trees and shrubs. Delineate the plantings that are to remain and those that are to be
removed. Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan delineating the limits of grading and clearing and the
location and method of tree protection. Revise the Landscape Plan by showing all existing planting that is to remain,
identified for species and size.
5. Revise all applicable drawings by reducing the number of parking spaces by 3 for a total of 198 spaces. Achieve this
reduction by converting 3 equidistant parking spaces, currently shown along the perimeter of the western most
parking lot, facing Route 29, to 3 individual planting islands with large canopy trees.
6. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show a total of 8 London Plane trees, 35' on center, along the Route 29N
frontage.
7. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show a total of 4 Crimson King Red Maple trees, 2 Yz" in caliper, 40' on
center, along the perimeter of the parking lot adjacent to the Proffit Road right -of -way. Revise the drawing to show
trees, 40' on center, 2' /z" in caliper, along the edge of the curvilinear parking proposed in the southwest corner of
the site.
8. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show the following:
The location of the existing overhead power line /easement along the Route 29N frontage.
The proposed underground stormwater management system.
The proposed sanitary sewer connection west of the addition.
The proposed underground fire (water) line east of the addition.
The proposed grading as shown on Sheet 3 of 3 Grading & Drainage Plan.
The location of all proposed site lighting. If site lighting is not proposed, add a note on the drawing to that effect.
9. Revise the location and /or type of street trees along the Route 29N Corridor to avoid conflicts with overhead utilities.
Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include the following note: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be
allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be
pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.
10. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan by replacing the linear planting of Compacta Hollies, shown along the perimeter
of the existing /proposed parking lot west of the existing /proposed buildings, with a wider planting area whose outer
EC) edge parallels the Route 29N Corridor. Provide plant material within this planting area that includes a mix of
shrub types and heights (4 species minimum), arranged in a less structured, natural layout.
11. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan by showing a mix of shrub species, with varying heights, around the foundation
of the proposed addition. Revise the planting proposal in the area formed by the south elevation of the existing
structure, the west elevation of the proposed addition, and the adjacent curvilinear parking with a proposal that
includes more planting, with a mix of plant types and species that will serve, as viewed from the Corridor, as a visual
transition between the existing and proposed buildings.
12. For all proposed signage, provide a complete sign package addressing all of the criteria outlined in the ARB Sign
Review Checklist. Reduce the size of the EMERGENCY sign, proposed directly beneath the cornice in the
southwest corner of the proposed structure, so as not to crowd the sign area, and revise the location to one that is
more coordinated with the architecture. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include a landscape proposal for the
area around the freestanding signs. This proposal should serve to incorporate the sign into the overall planting plan
for the development.
13. Provide a lighting photometric plan showing the location of all proposed site, building and decorative lighting. Include
a luminaire schedule of all proposed exterior lighting on the photometric plan, clearly indicating all lighting options
chosen, including but not limited to heights and colors proposed for all fixtures and poles. All fixtures emitting 3,000
or more lumens shall be full cutoff style fixtures. If site lighting is not proposed, revise Sheet 2 of 3 Layout & Utility
Plan to include a note to that effect.
14. Revise the Plant Schedule on Sheet LL -2 Landscape Plan to correctly identify the plant label for the Nellie Stevens
Holly as NH.
15. Create a transition between the new construction and the existing construction to prevent juxtaposition of new and
old materials.
16. Reconsider the replication of the bay window element by including other forms that reflect the architectural character
in differing ways.
17. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations by:
o Correctly identifying the drawing scale as 1" = 8'.
o Correctly identifying elevation East Exterior Elevation as the West Elevation and elevation North
Exterior Elevation as the South Elevation.
o Correctly identifying existing and new construction.
o Revising all annotation referring to refurbishing existing EIFS to correctly reflect the applicant's
intention of replacing it with the EIFS sample included in this submission.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and
schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.org /planning.
Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each
drawing and an ARB approval signature panel. Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each
comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the
memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
cc: Ron Cottrell
Martha Jefferson Hospital
459 Locust Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22902
pF A
1l,
trl
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
April 24, 2009
Scott J Swanson AIA
Gresham, Smith and Partners
10 South Sixth St. Suite 100
Richmond VA 23219
RE: ARB2009 =00018 Martha Jefferson Hospital — 29 North /Proffit Additions
Tax Map 32A, Section 2 Parcel 1A
Dear Mr. Swanson:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on April 20, 2009, completed a preliminary review of
the above -noted request to renovate an existing 'building, construct an addition to the building, and expand required site
improvements including parking. The Board offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's next
submittal. Please note that the following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments
may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes to the plan.
1. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevationsto include a schedule listing all proposed materials and colors. The schedule should
include the manufacturer's name, product ID, and color for all proposed materials. Revise the building elevations to
clearly indicate the location of each material. Revise the design of the southeast porte - cochere to either more
effectively integrate with the architecture of the building or identify itself as a pavilion -like element. Revise all
applicable drawings to clearly indicate the proposed materials and colors.
At(,2. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations to Include a dashed outline delineating the height and location of the rooftop
equipment. Dimension the drawing to show the distance from the top of the equipment to the top of the screen. AddcanotetoSheetA.301 Elevations and Sheet 2 of 3 Layout & Utility Plan stating: All rooftop equipment shall not be
visible from the Route 29N Entrance Corridor.
3. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include details of all plant materials proposed for the bio- filter adjacent to the
southwest boundary. A planting design that disguises the utilitarian purpose of this facility would be appropriate.
4. Revise the Existing Conditions Plan, Layout & Utility Plan and Grading & Drainage Plan to show the location,
species, and size of all existing trees and shrubs. Delineate the plantings that are to remain and those that are to be
removed. Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan delineating the limits of grading and clearing and the
location and method of tree protection. Revise the Landscape Plan by showing all existing planting that is to remain,
iidentified for species and size.
1pAAki v 6 Revise all applicable drawings by reducing the number of parking spaces by 3 for a total of 198 spaces. Achieve this
PO reduction by converting 3 equidistant parking spaces, currently shown along the perimeter of the westem most
g parking lot, facing Route 29, to 3 individual planting islands with large canopy trees.
6. Revise Sheet LL - Landscape Plan to show a total of 8 London Plane trees, 35' on center, along the Route 29N
frontage.
7. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show a total of 4 Crimson King Red Maple trees, -2 1 /2' in caliper, 40' on
center, along the perimeter of the parking lot adjacent to the Proffit Road right -of -way. Revise the drawing to show
trees, 40' on center, 2 1/2" in caliper, along the edge of the curvilinear parking proposed in the southwest corner of
the site.
8. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to show the following:
The location of the existing overhead power line /easement along the Route 29N frontage.
The proposed underground stormwater management system.
The proposed sanitary sewer connection west of the addition.
The proposed underground fire (water) line east of the addition.
The proposed grading as shown on Sheet 3 of 3 Grading & Drainage Plan.
The location of all proposed site fighting. If site lighting is not proposed, add a note on the drawing to that effect.
9. Revise the location and/or type of street trees along the Route 29N Corridor to avoid conflicts with overhead utilities.
Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include the following note: All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be
allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be
pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant.
10. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan by replacing the linear planting of Compacta Hollies, shown along the perimeter
of the existing /proposed parking lot west of the existing /proposed buildings, with a wider planting area whose outer
EC) edge parallels the Route 29N Corridor. Provide plant material within this planting area that includes a mix of
shrub types and heights (4 species minimum), arranged In a less structured, natural layout.
11. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan by showing a mix of shrub species, with varying heights, around the foundation
of the proposed addition. Revise the planting proposal in the area formed by the south elevation of the existing
structure, the west elevation of the proposed addition, and the adjacent curvilinear parking with a proposal that
includes more planting, with a mix of plant types and species that will serve, as viewed from the Corridor, as a visual
transition between the existing and proposed buildings.
12. For all proposed signage, provide a complete sign package addressing all of the criteria outlined in the ARB Sign
Review Checklist. Reduce the size of the EMERGENCY sign, proposed directly beneath the cornice in the
southwest corner of the proposed structure, so as not to crowd the sign area, and revise the location to one that is
more coordinated with the architecture. Revise Sheet LL -1 Landscape Plan to include a landscape proposal for the
area around the freestanding signs. This proposal should serve to incorporate the sign into the overall planting plan
for the development.
13. Provide a lighting photometric plan showing the location of all proposed site, building and decorative lighting. Include
a luminaire schedule of all proposed exterior lighting on the photometric plan, clearly indicating all lighting options
chosen, Including but not limited to heights and colors proposed for all fixtures and poles. All fixtures emitting 3,000
or more lumens shall be full cutoff style fixtures. If site lighting is not proposed, revise Sheet 2 of 3 Layout & Utility
Plan to include a note to that effect.
14. Revise the Plant Schedule on Sheet LL -2 Landscape Plan to correctly identify the plant label for the Nellie Stevens
Holly as NH.
15. Create a transition between the new construction and the existing construction to prevent Juxtaposition of new and
old materials.
16. Reconsider the replication of the bay window element by including other forms that reflect the architectural character
in differing ways.
17. Revise Sheet A.301 Elevations by:
o Correctly Identifying the drawing scale as 1" = 8'.
o Correctly identifying elevation East Exterior Elevation as the West Elevation and elevation North
Exterior Elevation as the South Elevation.
o Correctly identifying existing and new construction.
o Revising all annotation referring to refurbishing existing E1FS to correctly reflect the applicant's
intention of replacing it with the E1FS sample included in this submission.
You may submit your application for continued ARB review at your earliest convenience. Application forms, checklists and
schedules are available on -line at www.albemarle.ora /olanning.
Revised drawings addressing the comments listed above are required. Include updated ARB revision dates on each
drawing and an ARB approval signature panel. Please provide a memo including detailed responses indicating how each
comment has been addressed. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the
memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Brent Nelson
Landscape Planner
cc: Ron Cottrell
Martha Jefferson Hospital
459 Locust Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22902
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
From:Max Greene, Current Development engineering review
Date:7 May 2009
Subject: Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (SDP200900034)
The preliminary site plan has received Engineering review. The following comments are to address the
Engineering concerns with the plan.
The following items will be adequately addressed prior to preliminary approval:
1. Please submit a SWM Modified Simple Method worksheet for review.
2. SWM Plan should be clarified to show the currently existing site conditions and the proposed
changes to impervious areas. All previous site conditions are superfluous to the approval process.
Stormwater protection cannot be grandfathered.)
3. Please clarify the location of loading spaces as required. [18- 4.12.13]
The following items will be adequately addressed prior to fmal site plan approval:
4. VDOT approval is required for the proposed impacts to public travelways.
5. Unobstructed sight distance lines at entrances, less than 10' x Speed Limit of intersected streets,
measured from a point 10' off the edge of pavement of the intersected street.
6. E &SC and SWM protection plans and fees are required for review. [17 -302, 17 -303] The
Proposed E &SC plan does not appear to work as shown and will require modification to reduce
the burden on the contractor. This office suggests a meeting to discuss engineering concerns.
Current Development Engineering is available from 2:30 -4 PM on Thursdays to discuss these
review comments. Please contact Max Greene at 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3283 or email
mgreene@albemarle.org to schedule a Thursday afternoon appointment.
7. Paved construction entrance will be required. This office recommends utilizing the existing
pavement for the construction entrance.
8. Dumpster pad detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 6 concrete of 3000psi at
28 days, or stronger, reinforced with a minimum grid of wire reinforcing or #4 bars at 12" on
center. [Specs are policy]
9. Proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 will have low maintenance (not grass) ground cover specified on
the plan. [Policy]
10. Drainage profiles and matching drainage computations required. [14 -311, 18 -32]
11. Please supply copies of manufacturer's approval of the plan for any manufactured stormwater
management facilities (filterra, stormfilter, sandfilter, etc.) [Policy]
12. A completed copy of the Standard Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and fee for recordation for
the stormwater facilities is required prior to fmal approval. [17 -304E] The folins and instructions
can be found on the Community Development Department Web site on www.albemarle.org
13. Albemarle Design Standards Manual contains a checklist with additional requirements for Final
site plan approval.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
From:Max Greene, Current Development engineering review
Date:7 May 2009
Subject: Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (SDP200900034)
The preliminary site plan has received Engineering review. The following comments are to address the
Engineering concerns with the plan.
1
The following items will be adequately addressed prior to preliminary approval:
S Please submit a SWM Modified Simple Method worksheet for review.
A .SWM Plan should be clarified to show the currently existing site conditions and the proposed
14-C3 f ,changes to impervious areas. All previous site conditions are superfluous to the approval process.
Stormwater protection cannot be grandfathered.)
2. 1.04 ) G CJ Please clarify the location of loading spaces as required. [18- 4.12.13]
The following items will be adequately addressed prior to final site plan approval:
4. VDOT approval is required for the proposed impacts to public travelways.
5. Unobstructed sight distance lines at entrances, less than 10' x Speed Limit of intersected streets,
measured from a point 10' off the edge of pavement of the intersected street.
6. E &SC and SWM protection plans and fees are required for review. [17 -302, 17 -303] The
Proposed E &SC plan does not appear to work as shown and will require modification to reduce
the burden on the contractor. This office suggests a meeting to discuss engineering concerns.
Current Development Engineering is available from 2:30 -4 PM on Thursdays to discuss these
review comments. Please contact Max Greene at 434 - 296 -5832 ext. 3283 or email
mgreene @albemarle.org to schedule a Thursday afternoon appointment.
7. Paved construction entrance will be required. This office recommends utilizing the existing
pavement for the construction entrance.
8. Dumpster pad detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 6" concrete of 3000psi at
28 days, or stronger, reinforced with a minimum grid of wire reinforcing or #4 bars at 12" on
center. [Specs are policy]
9. Proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 will have low maintenance (not grass) ground cover specified on
the plan. [Policy]
10. Drainage profiles and matching drainage computations required. [14 -311, 18 -32]
11. Please supply copies of manufacturer's approval of the plan for any manufactured stormwater
management facilities (filterra, stormfilter, sandfilter, etc.) [Policy]
12. A completed copy of the Standard Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and fee for recordation for
the stormwater facilities is required prior to final approval. [17 -304E] The forms and instructions
can be found on the Community Development Department Web site on www.albemarle.org .
13. Albemarle Design Standards Manual contains a checklist with additional requirements for Final
site plan approval.
Cu.::EI . p-p NM; A :Larth. 1.IT,t- ::nChnpni:vtC arc C U (T iIIIRd.Ld,4r
Sincerely,
011 A
Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Current Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596
Phone: (434)296 -5832 Ext 3385
Fax: (434)972 -4126
Serv Auth/ r ty
TO: Gerald Gatobu
FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer
DATE: May 11, 2009
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffitt)
SDP2000900034
TM32A -2 -1 A
The below checked items apply to this site.
X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
X 2. An 8 inch water line is located on site.
3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is
Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located on site.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7.and plans are currently under review.
8.and plans have been received and approved.
X 9. No plans are required.
10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting tentative approval.
11. Final site plan may /may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections.
13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide a plumbing fixture count to
size the meter.
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows:
meter locations water line size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698
www.serviceauthoriy.org
Aid AI,Ra,
f /RGINIP
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Rachel McKinney (RK &K)
From:Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date:May 18, 2009
Subject: SDP2009 -00034 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center Major /Preliminary Site Plan
The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend approval of
the major /preliminary site plan referred to above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
32.5.6 The preliminary site plan shall contain the following information:
a. The name of the development: Include the site plan number SDP2009 -00034 to the site plan for
current and future reference.
c. If phasing is planned, phase lines and proposed timing of development. Required parking will have to
be available for the existing use at all times, therefore, the plan will have to be carefully phased to
manage parking for the existing use and parking for the proposed addition.
1. Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements. Are there any proposed utility
easements with the new addition?
n. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including:
Outdoor lighting: A lighting plan that complies with the lighting requirements of section 4.17 of the
Albemarle County Code will be required at final site plan stage if outdoor lighting is proposed.
Loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots
and driveways; Loading spaces shall be provided in addition to and exclusive of any parking
requirement on the basis of (1) space for the first eight thousand (8,000) square feet of office space
plus one (1) space for each additional twenty thousand (20,000) square feet of office space. Please
show the location and the required number of loading spaces for the use.
Signs: New /proposed signs for the facility should not be shown on this site plan. Signs are
approved during sign permit application review. The location of any proposed signs will be
approved during sign permit review.
1
of A
feltIih
u
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Rachel McKinney (RK &K)
From:Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date:May 18, 2009
Subject: SDP2009 -00034 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center Major/Preliminary Site Plan
The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend approval of
the major /preliminary site plan referred to above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless
otherwise specified.]
32.5.6 The preliminary site plan shall contain the following information:
b a. The name of the development: Include the site plan numper SDP2009 -00034 to the site plan for
current and future reference. 51, h , M 6/- 0.4 dt
dc. If phasing is planned, phase lines and proposed timing of development. Required parking will have to
be available for the existing use at all times. therefore, the plan will have to be carefully phased to
manage parking for the existing use and parldng for the propose 8 ' I dition. OGTES 6,11,p Et. 'To
11.0 to- r'kt.0 'PA .
Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements. Are there any proposed utility
easements with the new addition? pu_ C45-t , S'+fir L1 M ITS AbD15 11.30 1
E t S 1 ToSt"
n. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements inc uding:
a
z,r, cl ,Outdoor lighting: A lighting plan that complies with the lighting requirements of section 4.17 of the
C` Albemarle County Code will be required at final site plan stage if outdoor lighting is proposed.
Z ( " Loading and service areas together with the proposed paving material types for all walks, parking lots
Aikt7lS N ,i and driveways; Loading spaces shall be provided in addition to and exclusive of any parking
requirement on the basis of (1) space for the first eight thousand (8,000) square feet of office space
plus one (1) space for each additional twenty thousand (20,000) square feet of office space. Please
depew show the location and the required number of loading spaces for the use.
Signs: New /proposed signs for the facility should not be shown on this site plan. Signs are
i(approved during sign permit application review. The location of any proposed signs will be
S 4otiJ A) Q AJ approved during sign permit review.
1 1 L.AK1.
h 11 1 ' l .
R'' iDJ
COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE
701 VDOT WAY
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911
DAVID S. EKERN, P.E.
COMMISSIONER
May 20 2009.
Mr. Glenn Brooks
Department of Engineering and Development
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments May 21 , 2009 site review meeting
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the May 21 2009 Site Review
Committee Meeting:
SDP - 2006 -00041 Briarwood Phase 1A- 1.1B -L 8 (Elizabeth Marotta)
1. Engineering comments were provided by VDOT on 4 -23 -09 for the additional phase
of the project.
SDP- 2009 -00030 Forest Lakes Office Park -Maior (Summer Frederick)
1. No comments
SDP- 2009 -00031 Collins Medical Center - Preliminary (Gerald Gatobu)
1. Final plans need to show the proposed entrance profile.
2. Final plan needs to show details for CG -6, CG -11, and CG -12B and detectable
warning.
3. A Land Use Permit will be required for construction within the public road right
of way.
SDP - 2009 -00033 University 'Village Retirement Community(Phase I) Summer
Frederick
1. The proposed connection to Route 29 needs to be a minimum of 510 feet from the
existing intersection or line up with the intersection at the signal.
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
2._ This site plan exceeds the threshold to require a Chapter 527 Traffic Impact
Analysis.
3. The proposed road must provide a connection to the existing Boulders Road to
meet the connectivity requirements of SSAR's, 24VAC 30 -92. Without the
connection the road may not be eligible for acceptance into the State Secondary
System of Highways.
4. The CG -12 detail needs to be updated and show the proper detectable warning.
5. The proposed Functional Classification needs to be indicated on the plan.
6. If the connection is made to Boulders Road, additional traffic will need to be
shown to properly determine the design speed and pavement structural section of
the road.
7. Provide the horizontal alignment data on the roads.
8. Street design data on sheet R -4 lists University Village Road but the plans show
University Village Dr. Is this the same road?
9. The sight distance on University Village Dr. / Rd. need to be based on the correct
design speed on the road.
10. Pavement design on University Village Dr. needs to be designed in accordance
with the AASHTO method if this is designed as a collector road.
11. Storm sewer pipes need to be as perpendicular as possible to the centerline of the
road and cannot exceed 45 degrees.
12. Street Trees on University Village Dr. need to be located outside of the clear zone
of the road if this road is to be classified as a collector.
SDP- 2009 -00034 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffit) -Maior (Gerald
2.5 LiEur atIIu
It appears that the parking and detention facility for this site is in conflict with a
Ov TiPnT previous plan for the widening of Proffit Road and the construction of a
roundabout at this intersection. The road plan indicates that there has been a
VQ fad-dedication of right of way for the road widening and intersection improvement.
rtrrtox- izzok D VW kg --
g 1S3KRA
Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If
you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with
the applicants.
Sincerely,
Joel DeNunzio, P.E.
Staff Engineer
VDOT Charlottesville Residency
434- 293 -0011
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Application #:SDP200900034 lSho t Review C®mr rents
Project Name:[Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffitt)- Major 1 Major Amendment
Date Completed:05/12/2009
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION.
Date Completed:05/04/2009
Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Please indicate the location of fire hydrants. All portions of the building must be within 400 feet of a
hydrant by way of a prepared travel way. Please indicate the fire flow from existing hydarnts and
estimated fire flow (calculations) for proposed hydrants.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:Judith Wiegand Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Long -range plannign staff has reviewed this preliminary site plan for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan, including the Neighborhood Model. The proposed use is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff has identified the following issues and recommends the following
changes:
1. Sidewalks should be shown along both Proffit Road and Leake Square.
2. The applicant should be aware that Proffit Road will be widened to a four -lane section from the
intersection with US 29 west to well beyond Worth Xing /Leake Square. A roundabout will also be
constructed at the intersection of Proffit/Leake/Worth Crossing. The applicant should consult with
VDOT to make sure they have left enough right -of -way along Proffit Road, especially at the corner
where the roundabout is proposed.
3. Also, Leake Square will become a public road and be extended as a part of the North Pointe
development. The applicant should be certain they have left enough right -of -way along Leake Square
for the road to be constructed to public standards.
4. Both of these road improvements may have an impact on the amount and location of parking
shown on the site plan.
Date Completed:05/08/2009
Reviewer:Max Greene CommDev- Current Development
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: SRC 5/21
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, May 18, 2009
ms
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
August 14 2009
Rachel McKinney [RK &K]
801 East Main Street
Suite 1000
Richmond, VA, .23219
RE: SDP = 200900034 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center Preliminary Site Plan
Dear Madam:
The Department of Community Development hereby grants administrative approval to the above
referenced site plan.
Preliminary site plan approval is valid for (1) one year in accordance with Section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18
of the Albemarle County Code. Therefore, preliminary site plan approval shall expire on 08/14/2010. If
preliminary site plan approval expires, a new application must be filed and processed.
Please address all of the requirements and conditions listed below and submit eight (8) tentative plan
copies to the Department of Community Development. This letter must be submitted with the tentative
plans, as a checklist, to document that you have addressed all requirements or conditions, or the tentative
plan will be denied.
Erosion and Sediment‘Control, BMP Stormwater Management, and road plans with the associated
applications and fees must also be submitted with the eight (8) tentative Plans.
Once the tentative plan is-submitted and reviewed you will receive comments from all
departments /divisions /agencies that have made comment on the plan. Any :further
responses must be - made directly to each department/division /agency that has further.comment.
After.all ;aforementioned departments /divisions /agencies have granted .atentative approval, you
must verify withthePlanner that you may submitthefinal mylars (2 sets), two papercopies, the
final site .plan.application,.and final site plan feetothe Department of Community Development.
Signing ofthe plans will occur within one week once it is determined that the final site plan mylars
reflect all tentative .approvals.
The final site plan will be subject to all final site plan requirements (Zoning Ordinance Section 32.6), in
addition to the following conditions.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature
until tentative approvals for the following conditions have been obtained:
1
r
Zoning & Current Development approval to include:
01 Required parking will have be available for the existing use at all times, therefore,
the plan will carefullyhavetobecarefull phased to manage parking for the existing use and
parking for the proposed addition. Ac,-vz, ' , pp i G
D -, , The Landscape plan will be reviewed and comments given with the final site plan.
The lighting plan will be reviewed and comments given with the final site plan.
vi_,;lat. Please provide zoning approval for the mobile tech unit.
AP,b KEA rJ N ct'j N.ii. 4AC1i1VCl
Please contact Planner at 434 - 296 -5832 ext 3385 if you have questions or require additional information. J\L_ }4,4
Engineering approval to include:
c Preliminary review comments appear addressed. Final, SWM, and E &SC plans will be
reviewed per County Design Standards Manual Checklist for Engineering.
Please contact Max Greene at 434 -296 -5832 ext 3283 if you have questions or require additional
information.
Albemarle County Service Authority approval to include:
04t,* Obstructions or improvements are not allowed in ACSA easements. Have the applicant
relocate the light poles. The applicant provided a plumbing fixture count indicating a 2"
meter. Our GIS shows a 1 %" meter, so a new connection may be necessary. I think that
the existing vault will be ok with some adaption.
Please contact Gary Whelan at 434 - 977 -4511 if you have questions or require additional information.
Fire & Rescue approval to include:
Please indicate the location of fire hydrants. All portions of the building must be within
400 feet of a hydrant by way of a prepared travel way. Please indicate the fire flow from
existing hydrants and estimated fire flow (calculations) for proposed hydrants. , ice. HI N1\-*
t:y t1' F r - ` i sc . Aid
Please contact James Barber at 434 -296 -5833 if you have questions or require additional information.
VDOT approval to include:
V . It appears that the detention facility for this site is in conflict with a previous plan for the
widening of Profit Road and the construction of a roundabout at this intersection. The
Road Plan indicates that there has been a dedication of right of way for the road widening
and intersection improvement. 4j C' n
Please contact Joel Denunzio at 434- 293 -0011 ext 120 if you have questions or require additional b
information.1
Architectural Review Board approval to Include:
U 01, All Architectural Review Board comments must be addressed before final site plan
approval can be granted.
Please contact Brent Nelson at 434 - 296 -5832 ext 3272 if you have questions or require additional
information.
2
Albemarle County Department of Planning (PIaces 29 Planner)
XLong-range planning staff has reviewed this preliminary site plan for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan, including the Neighborhood Model. The proposed use is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff has identified the following issues and
recommends the following changes:
p 1. Sidewalks should be shown along both Proffit Road and Leake Square.
2. The applicant should be aware that Proffit Road will be widened to a four -lane section
from the intersection with US 29 west to well beyond Worth Xing/Leake Square. A
I.F:J\4 roundabout will also be constructed at the intersection of Proffit/Leake/Worth Crossing.
The applicant should consult with VDOT to make sure they have left enough right -of-
alt way along Proffit Road, especially at the comer where the roundabout is proposed.
3. Also, Leake Square will become a public road and be extended as a part of the North
l O Ci rFl Pointe development. The applicant should be certain they have left enough right -of -way
along Leake Square for the road to be constructed to public standards.
4. Both of these road improvements may have an impact on the amount and location ofFi - \-=parking shown on the site plan.
Please contact Judy Wiegand at 434 - 296 -5832 ext 3438 if you have questions or require additional
information.
Sincerely,
All
Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
Zoning & Current Development
File: SDP - 200900034
Cc:
3•
Application #:SDP20090004 7Short Review .Comnnents
Project Name:lMartha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffitt)- Major Major Amendment
Date Completed:05/12/2009
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION.
Date Completed:05/04/2009
Reviewer.James Barber Fire Rescue
q Changes
i
Review Status:Requested Chan es C i! • K 5Ih
Reviews ComPleaseindicatethelocationoffirehydrants. All portions of the building must be within 400 feet of
hydrant by way of a prepared travel way. Please indicate the fire flow from existing hydarnts and
estimated fire flow (calculations) for proposed hydrants.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:Judith Wiegand Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Long -range plannign staff has reviewed thls preliminary site plan for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan, including the Neighborhood Model. The proposed use is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff has identified the following issues and recommends the following
changes:
PO I >gN/9 Sidewalks should be shown along both Proffit Road and Leake Square.
t1 The applicant should be aware that Proffit Road will be widened to a four -lane section from the40004I'Df intersection with US 29 west to well beyond Worth Xing /Leake Square. A roundabout will also be
constructed at the intersection of Proffit/Leake/Worth Crossing. The applicant should consult with4VDOTtomakesuretheyhaveleftenoughright -of -way along Proffit Road, especially at the corner
ZS where the roundabout is proposed.
t OF 'DC M' ,Also, Leake Square will become a public road and be extended as a part of the North Pointe
11 development. The applicant should be certain they have left enough right -of -way along Leake Square
v\ETJct•, for the road to be constructed to public standards.
Val 004.-1> it Both of these road improvements may have an impact on the amount and location of parking
FOI on the site plan.
Date Co 05/08/2009
Reviewer.Max Greene CommDev- Current Development
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: SRC 5/21
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, May 18, 2009
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Application #SDP20090003 ;- _?RB19,960001,1:PS'rAilApplications .,
Project Name MB tl 'Zel t
ff
titOM tentertfAttittrt maio .ARB1997.0OOQ7S•.
Application Type Site f7eve {oprbeht'.pldl ,.r ARB20t200026''
o ,AR.B200900018';;Tax Map Parcel 032A0- 024!0 *00A0;4:
Re ues'tfor:ma ,Sit lan°arnendmaer f r the addition ota new.2;j: SD 266006034: iProjectDescriptionstory21,0 totarefo 'office bbidinrovalg : c i an. existin
subject propertY', iszoned; H[ ghwa Ceri nerciat ;(IIC),"AfrportImpacaArea' ,'= m
AIA),,' and entrane0 Cot1idai,'(EC) The`'pi,3pertY,Moesc as:Tax' "32A,3 `;
Section 2 PParcel1A 'is orated li? the.Rlvanra 'Ma tai Distrjct Seminole
Trail: [US Routes 291. about400,feett from. the intersection of Seirinoie Trail
05' Route 29 Northl and'Proffl Read 649,)'' )'he Cotnprehensive'Plan°r '
designates this propertt S'Regionai Service irrthe` "hioliyrriead Community;
TMP
Proffer
Status
REVIEWS Add Planning Review »
Review Coordinator Site Inspector Date Assigned Entered By: Jay Schlothauer on 05/26/2009
Gerald Gatobu Lisa Green 04/29/2009
Reviewer ID Submittal Type Group or Agency Status Received Due Completed
Jay Schlothauer Major Amendment, Preliminary Plan Inspections No Objection 05/01/2009 05/18/2009 05/26/2009
Andrew Slack No Objection.:,; •,''; 05/01/2009:: 05 /x1/200 '^ 05/12/2009
7a9SChlothauer Major, Amenddment, i?r No Obj ctloi 01/2009'' 05/18/2009 05/26/2009 `'
MatiGreene Major Amendment, FI ,Camntpev Reg est d Changes 04/28/2009,: 05/18/2 05/08 'Gerald Gatobu:' ':.` ^'` : ' No Submittal.Tylp e Gomm0e Current Requested Changes; 04/2 /200 05 /18 /200 ps %48/2609'
larnea Barber` -+ . Major Amendment, Pr Fir4 Resc 01.41f : R quested hanger } 05/04/2009: 05/18/2009 °: 05/04/2009Brent - Nelson ;t f, - /l`', y, Major Ariiendment, P r AR 4 Rec t e ted'Change * 05/0$/2009: 05/ 05/05/Z009;'
Iudith Wiegand Major Amendrnenit,'Pr Piahning- U° M1 ,t ° " Requested Changed '05/04 /2009. 05/18 /2009
l"+ `4~L " y .PS ip .l'+ ;k•t,i .J ii .'
X 1.«
is x.: ;;' - h ' 'r :.. ; d,;
ems tf + 4,::r.'' P,.,,.
y t ij:;d ^ 14"t.4".7 G;,;.:j';s'$, :.
4
r .
fir
Document Review Title Review Documents will also show on the Web)
Existing Review Docs
Comments: The box below is meant for short comments.
Based on plans dated April 27, 2009.
No comments or conditions.
Note: If this building is to include "rehabilitation facilities" and /or "physical therapy facilities ", the
number of barrier -free parking spaces may have to be increased.
r,i 1
ti p
Date Sent
kWinOci
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596
Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126
Project:Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffit) — Major Amendment
Plan preparer:Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP - Rachel McKinney fax (804) 782 -2142]
Owner or rep.:Martha Jefferson Hospital fax (434) 982 -7016]
Plan received date: 24 September 2009
Date of comments: 7 October 2009
Reviewer:Max Greene
The plan for Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffit) - Major amendment
submitted 24 September 2009 has received Engineering review. The plans may be
approved after the following changes /corrections are adequately addressed.
A. Site plans (SDP200900034)
1. VDOT approval is required. Comments will be forwarded when received.
DM905]
2. Dumpster pad detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 6"
concrete of 3000psi at 28 days, or stronger, reinforced with a minimum grid of
wire reinforcing or #4 bars at 12" on center. [specs are policy]
B. Stormwater Management and Mitigation Plan (WP0200900049)
1. A completed copy of the standard stormwater maintenance agreement and fee for
recordation for any stormwater management facilities will be submitted and
approved prior to final approval. [ 17 -304E1
2. Copies of manufacturer's approval of the plan for any manufactured stormwater
management facilities (filterra, stormfilter, sandfilter, etc.) will be submitted prior
to final approval. [Policy]
C. Erosion Control Plan (WP0200900049)
1. The construction entrance does not appear to be an accessible route during the 2
phase of construction. Please clarify how the construction traffic will access the
site for the duration of the project.
2. Drainage swale down western edge of Leake Sq. does not appear to be properly
addressed. Please clarify how stormwater flows will be controlled down the edge
of the road and under the new entrance.
3. Sediment trap #2 appears to be deeper than the existing pipe currently in that
area. Please clarify this possible discrepancy.
4. Drainage profiles: 14 18 - 32] drainage profiles for each pipe, structure or
channel must contain:
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 2
a. Any channel linings (channel along Leake Sq.)
b. A VDOT designation (MH -1, DI -3B, etc.) for each structure
c. Throat length for each drop inlet
d. Grate type for each grate inlet
e. Material and strength class or gage of each pipe
f. Concrete inlet shaping (IS -1) specified on any structure with a 4' or greater
drop
5. E &SC Narrative:
a. Existing site conditions description
b. Adjacent areas description
c. Off -site areas description including any off -site areas for borrow, waste or
other disturbance.
d. Soils descriptions
e. Stormwater runoff considerations: this can refer to the stormwater
management plan
6. E &SC Plan:
a. Dust control symbols (DC)
b. Temporary and permanent seeding symbols (TS, PS)
c. Protection provided for all stages of construction
d. No erosion control measures in the way of construction access or grading
Diversion dikes or silt fence are not placed in the middle of the site, or
through access or grading. Sediment traps are not under or on top of fill.
Construction entrances are not on fill, etc. If the concept for site protection
is not adequate in this regard, further review of the plan may not be
possible)
e. Existing soil boundaries are shown with labels. Areas already disturbed
are indicated, with constructed fill depth or cut noted.
f. A stockpile location
g. A staging and parking area, or other construction related areas
OF ALA.
S '
RG j
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:Rachel McKinney (RK &K)
From:Gerald Gatobu, Principal Planner
Division: Zoning and Current Development
Date:October 9, 2009
Subject: SDP2009 -00034 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center [Tentative]
The County of Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development will grant or recommend
approval of the tentative site plan referred to above once the following comments have been
addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the
Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
32.6 FINAL SITE PLAN CONTENT
AI ,.a, Easement Plats (dedicated to public use) and any offsite easements dedicated to
public use must be signed and recorded before final site plan approval.
LIGHTING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
dLumen level (3000 or more must be full cutoff)
c.,... t : c y }_yz CA Please provide cut sheets for fixtures that emit more than 3000
Li F ‘cLL) lumens. All fixtures that emit more than 3000lumens must be full cut
offfixtures. i v‘ - r . t,' w
1 'Bulb/lamp location (must be totally within house to be full cutoff)
r E_ `A: L A ` a t`_I c! 1 , Please provide cut sheets for fixtures that emit more than 3000
F t ": t . i c ,t_ lumens. All fixtures that emit more than 3000 lumens must be full cut
offfixtures. Ai w m i
Luminaire schedule
Q , ,Please add the standard lighting note as follows: Each outdoor luminaire
1 equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a
full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public
L1 . C roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not
exceed one -half footcandle.
Landscape Plan Checklist
Section 32.7.9.4: CONTENTS
i
a. The location, size and type of all proposed plant materials, and verification that minimum
landscaping and screening requirements have been satisfied. Plant materials may be indicated in
the following generic terms on the landscape plan: large or medium shade tree; screening tree;
screening shrub; or street shrub. The required plant materials shall be chosen from a
recommended species list approved by the agent. Plant material not listed may be substituted for
required plant material only if such substitution is expressly approved by the agent.
11. Existing trees or wooded areas may be preserved in lieu of planting new materials in order to
satisfy landscaping and screening requirements, subject to the agent's approval. In such case, the
landscape plan shall indicate the trees to be saved; limits of clearing; location and type of
protective fencing; grade changes requiring tree wells or walls; and trenching or tunneling
proposed beyond the limits of clearing. In addition, the applicant shall sign a conservation
checklist approved by the agent to insure that the specified trees will be protected during
construction. Except as otherwise expressly approved by the agent in a particular case, such
checklist shall conform to specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
H /ndbook, pp III -284 through III -297, and as hereafter amended.
al c. In addition, the landscape plan shall indicate existing landscape features on the site. Such
features sl}all include, but shall not be limited to:
al 1. Wooded area indicated by general type (evergreen or deciduous) and location of tree
li ?e;
U2. Small groups of trees and individual trees of six (6) inch caliper or greater, or
ornamental trees of any size, indicated by common name, approximate caliper and
to tion;
03. Natural features which distinguish the site, such as prominent ridge lines, rock
outcroppings or water features;
U . Man-made features of local, historic or scenic importance;
1 1g5. Scenic vistas across the site from a public road.
LIThe agent may require that any or all such features be preserved upon determination following
a site inspection, that the features contribute significantly to the character of the Albemarle
County landscape and that the preservation of such features is necessary to satisfy the purpose
and intent of this chapter.
Comment: If existing trees are going to be preserved, please include a
conservation plan checklist on the site plan. The conservation plan
checklist needs to be signed and checked.
J 1.t
Ji s'1, ;.. . ,, ti td _ 9
I.;
Catalog # coordinated with cut sheets
TA Please provide cut sheets for all the fixtures in the Luminaire schedule
that emit more than 3000 lumens.
Fixture quantity /types coordinated with quantity /types on lighting plan
There are fixtures delineated/shown on the lighting plan that are not
1represented in the Luminaire schedule. Fixtures BL, WL, VL, and SL2
E. .CAS , e' t-___1, are not in the Luminaire schedule. Are they existing fixture? If so,
please note this on the site plan.
Pole height/mounting height (ARB)v'.-i -`
N/A
j\k A Colors /finishes (ARB)
N/A
Tilt (must be 0 for full cutoff)
N/A
Fixture locations
Location conflicts with trees, utilities, etc.
Please make sure fixture locations do not conflict with trees, utilities
easements etc
Coordination with other site plan sheets
Fixture locations should not conflict with other site plan sheets
dShielding issues (freestanding signs, wall fixtures, etc.)
Free standing signs and wall fixtures must be shielded.
Photometric plan
Adjacent zoning
Thank you, this has been adequately addressed.
Property lines
Thank you, this has been adequately addressed.
dExcessive spillover
V:2
There
f_.l ,C._ There is excessive spillover along state route 29 (public road).
Spillover shall not exceed 0.5 foot- candles.t:AWit..
Excessive lighting levels (ARB)
4
1 ' N/A
Maintenance factor = 1.0
Thank you, this has been adequately addressed.
d Standard lighting notes
Application #:SDP200900034 Short Review Comr nts
Project Name: Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffitt)- Major Major Amendment j
Date Completed:05/12/2009
Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION.
Date Completed:06/04/2009
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: A Final Site Plan ARB application, addressing ARB comments at the 4/20/09 review, has been
received and is scheduled for review at the 7/20/09 ARB meeting.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:Gerald Gatobu CommDev- Current Development
Review Status:Pending
Reviews Comments: 8 copies prelim - 1 set comments - 1 site lighting sheet - 1 half set from Rummel, Klepper & Kahl LLP
Date Completed:06/12/2009
Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Approval is subject to field inspection
and verification.
Date Completed:05/04/2009
Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: Please indicate the location of fire hydrants. All portions of the building must be within 400 feet of a
hydrant by way of a prepared travel way. Please indicate the fire flow from existing hydarnts and
estimated fire flow (calculations) for proposed hydrants.
Date Completed:05/26/2009
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated April 27, 2009.
No comments or conditions.
Note: If this building is to include "rehabilitation facilities" and /or "physical therapy facilities ", the
number of barrier -free parking spaces may have to be increased.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:Judith Wiegand Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Reviews Comments: Long -range plannigr - has reviewed this preliminary site plan for - ompliance with the
Comprehensive PIa eluding the Neighborhood Model. The proj. J use is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan taff has identified the following issues and r ceommends the following
changes:
1. Sidewalks should be shown along both Proffit Road and Leake Square.
2. The applicant should be aware that Proffit Road will be widened to a four -lane section from the
intersection with US 29 west to well beyond Worth Xing /Leake Square. A roundabout will also be
constructed at the intersection of Proffit/Leake/Worth Crossing. The applicant should consult with
VDOT to make sure they have left enough right -of -way along Proffit Road, especially at the corner
where the roundabout is proposed.
3. Also, Leake Square will become a public road and be extended as a part of the North Pointe
development. The applicant should be certain they have left enough right -of -way along Leake Square
for the road to be constructed to public standards.
4. Both of these road improvements may have an impact on the amount and location of parking
shown on the site plan.
Date Completed:06/16/2009
Reviewer:Max Greene CommDev - Current Development
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments: Preliminary review comments appear addressed.
Final, SWM, and E &SC plans will be reviewed per County Design Standards Manual Checklist for
Engineering.
Date Completed:05/08/2009
Reviewer:Max Greene CommDev- Current Development
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: SRC 5/21
Page: 2.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, June 16, 2009